Why does he atttract so much schizo seething on Cinemaphile?
He doesn’t seem to have a schizo hatedom irl or anywhere else online, but here you make a Superman thread and you’re immediately bogged down by shrieking schizos
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
It's because beat Goku twice
No, these are the schizo threads, youre the schizo for constantly posting them. On-topic Superman threads are fine and generate normal discourse. The endless, casual, meta threads like this of "Why do people think he's so corny!?" "Why is he so triggering!?" are the real annoyance.
This is literally the first time I have posted this thread, and I’ve never seen a similar thread asking these questions. I want to get to the bottom of this.
There is a small clique of Superman hating autists who spam this board periodically. There’s a dragonball lover who hates Superman cause death battle says he could defeat Goku, one who insists aged up Jon Kent is vastly superior to Clark Kent (this guy outright hates Clark for some reason), one who insists Superman is a pedophile, one third worlder who gets really emotional about the fact that Superman (a fictional character) doesn’t stop real world genocides (he’ll post all-caps screeds on this, stuff like WHY WASN’T THE JUSTICE LEAGUE THERE), and a few more I can’t think of. I don’t even know what Supermanatee poster’s endgame is.
I don’t know why he attracts so many schizos, but he does. Don’t deny it
Superman has more threads dedicated to him than Spider-man and Batman combined, despite the fact that he's nowhere near as popular.
And it's always the same pictures and names.
Tomorrow there will be another thread featuring the "Andy Warhol Superman.jpg" picture.
So you can conclude that it's the same fricking schizo doing this shit. And then he blames the people getting tired of his ceaseless shit for being schizos.
Don't bother anon.
Just keep reminding him that Superman is a gay symbol and that he's gay by association for making these threads.
There we go! One of the schizos has turned up
What’s your endgame schizo?
You know what? Frick it.
Every time I see this "Andy Warhol Superman.jpg" on the front page I'm going to make a thread featuring this picture.
This was the first time I’ve seen this OP picture, why do you want to be ANOTHER homosexual posting about gay Jon stamping out the last bit of the brand?
I mean, I actually do use this Warhol pic of Superman a lot, but it's literally just pop art. I don't know why this schizo anon has fixated on it as an object of his hatred
>this schizo
I'm not the one flooding threads mate.
You need professional help.
you literally just admitted you were flooding threads
Why do you spam this pic anyway?
Mate, you need help.
Spamming a thread with 20+ images just because you don't like the opening post is not healthy behavior.
You're clearly not in a good place in life. You need to get in contact with a psychiatrist before you do something crazy.
>REEEEEEE IT'S NORMAL FOR ME TO POST THE SAME THREAD EIGHT BILLION TIMES, BUT HOW DARE YOU DERAIL ONE OF MINE
You already spam that image so how is what you're threatening to do any different from what you already do?
As for the Andy Warhol Superman pic that apparently triggers you so, here's a thread from yesterday with the exact same image
You'll notice it's an entirely different thread with nothing in common with this op. It's just a generic picture of Superman, I don't know what to tell you
Samegay, you already post "gay superman" threads daily
>there’s people are personally offended by the existence of a cartoon character and spam every thread about him with rage and tears
>oh yeah? Well, you use the same picture of Superman when making threads! That means it’s normal for them to behave that way
Whatever
Post those threads praising superman
Then let's compare with the number of threads reeing about Superman
You won't because you know the number of threads praising superman is one per week at best while the number of threads talking shit about him that use the same pics and comments are daily
>he's nowhere near as popular
LOL what third world countries without water can name superman faster than any other superhero
see
, complaints about Superman can be levied against superheroes as a whole. He's the progenitor of the genre at the peak of his unpopularity and that makes him an easy target.
>He doesn’t seem to have a schizo hatedom irl or anywhere else online,
Go to DC reddit. Mention the Snyderverse,
Enjoy the meltdown with some popcorn.
>Spend 1 minute to make a thread.
>Watch schizo spend 20 minutes flooding it with spam.
https://desuarchive.org/_/search/text/He%20doesn%E2%80%99t%20seem%20to%20have%20a%20schizo%20hatedom%20irl%20or%20anywhere%20else%20online%2C%20but%20here%20you%20make%20a%20Superman%20thread%20and%20you%E2%80%99re%20immediately%20bogged%20down%20by%20shrieking%20schizos/
So what are you trying to say? It's literally a new thread
>it's using the same image
Here's a thread from yesterday with the exact same image
You'll notice it's an entirely different thread with nothing in common with this op.
It's just a generic picture of Superman, I don't know what to tell you
>
>You'll notice it's an entirely different thread with nothing in common with this op.
It has the exact same file name, anon.
You were the one who made that thread.
Call a psychiatrist now. You need prescribed medication for your condition.
I'm going to break it down further for you, totally and completely, so you understand me perfectly and have no more room for questions.
So first, I made the OP of this thread. It has a picture, Andy Warhol Superman.jpg, and a question, "Why does [Superman] attract so much schizo seething on Cinemaphile?"
You, or another anon, responded to this OP post (made by me) saying "No, these are the schizo threads, youre the schizo for constantly posting them."
I responded to you, or to that anon, saying "This is literally the first time I have posted this thread, and I’ve never seen a similar thread asking these questions. I want to get to the bottom of this."
You, or another anon, responded to my post saying "Tomorrow there will be another thread featuring the "Andy Warhol Superman.jpg" picture." You, or another anon, then said "Every time I see this "Andy Warhol Superman.jpg" on the front page I'm going to make a thread featuring this picture."
I then responded to you, or to this different anon, saying "As for the Andy Warhol Superman pic that apparently triggers you so, here's a thread from yesterday with the exact same image
You'll notice it's an entirely different thread with nothing in common with this op. It's just a generic picture of Superman, I don't know what to tell you"
If you go to the thread that I linked, it uses the same picture, the Andy Warhol Superman.jpg that has become a totem of your hatred. With it, was the text "When are we getting more Superman omnibus editions? I want Silver and Bronze Age, plus the end of the Golden Age. They already have Byrne’s run in hardcover, but I’d like to be able to read (through physical media) everything from Action Comics #1 to Crisis On Infinite Earths"
Now if you compare the text in the two threads, you'll notice they are entirely different. One is asking why there is a schizo hatedom of Superman on Cinemaphile, the other is asking if Superman's publisher, DC comics, has any further collected editions of Superman comics coming out under their DC omnibus line.
Is it the same image of Superman? Yes.
Is it the same thread? No.
Another anon made a (now deleted post) saying that the text of the OP had been posted before, I responded with a tbharchive link showing that this thread is the only time the text has been posted, along with reposting the thread from yesterday.
To reiterate, the two OPs are entirely different. "why does Superman have a schizo hatedom on Cinemaphile" and "when are we getting more Superman omnibus editions" aren't even remotely similar. The only thing they have in common is the fact that both threads are related to Superman, and use the same picture.
If you answered the question in this OP, "Superman has a hatedom on Cinemaphile for such and such reason," it wouldn't answer the question "when are we getting more omnibus editions."
If you answered the question in the last thread, "DC will release a Silver Age Superman Omnibus on such and such date," it wouldn't answer the question "why does Superman attract a schizophrenic hatedom on Cinemaphile"
Certainly though, the two threads do have pictures of Superman on them. That much is true. In fact, the same images of Superman, with the same filename. This is not too uncommon. If you go to the website tbharchive, you can see stats on image reposts
https://desuarchive.org/co/statistics/image-reposts/
You can see that many pictures are reused many times, and often by the same people.
Do you understand now?
The tl;dr
>two threads image same
>two threads text different
It's weird how we've gone this far in the thread with nobody even attempting to answer the question in the op
Why does Superman attract so much schizo seething on Cinemaphile?
Superman doesn’t seem to have a schizo hatedom irl or anywhere else online, but here you make a Superman thread and you’re immediately bogged down by shrieking schizos
Why are you talking to yourself? You know the IP count is visible, right?
You need help.
>Why does he atttract so much schizo seething on Cinemaphile?
Gee I wonder why?
>Hasn't had a good live action movie (standalone or teamup) in almost fifty years.
>Hasn't had a good standalone cartoon in 20.
>No good standalone video game, and the only video games he does show up in he's the bad guy (Injustice, Rocksteadys Suicide Squad game).
>Almost always a punching bag for Batman and other more grounded and 'relatable' characters.
>Has been replaced as the aspirational hero in most zoomer pop culture by characters like Goku and Saitama and All-Might.
>Every other version of him in pop culture is evil or a douche, like Homelander, Ikaris, Superion.
>Has had a string of feminist socially progressive atheist writers for his comics who hate the character because of his small town conservative christian upbringing, and the fact he's a straight white male married with a kid.
>Can no longer stand for the American way because that's 'not progressive or inclusive'.
>Flashpoint was setting up him to be killed off and replaced by Supergirl.
>No new movies greenlit or are likely to get greenlit anytime soon.
Fans are desperate for any good news about Superman. And when fans get desperate. The go on message boards to b***h
This thread is about anti-Supes schizo seething, which details just about every Superman thread
Meant to write derails
>thread is about anti-Supes schizo seething
wtf does that even mean?
See
There’s this small collection of weirdos who just derail every thread with the exact same posts. Take this thread for example
it’s not even really about Superman, it’s about animated superhero movies in general. But still the first response is this seething schizo who spams every Superman thread with that same image
Or this thread
on a specific Superman cartoon immediately got hit by Gokugays
If you post about Superman frequently on this board you’ll notice these same few anons popping up in almost every thread even tangentially related to Superman
Either it's some guy upset at Death Battle, or more likely it's some untalented guy from 2000s era Cinemaphile who wants to revisit the glory days of when he used to post anti-Superman stuff because he read Encyclopedia Dramatica
Unironically, some of it is cultural.
Half of American audiences have never felt the alienation that superheroes, Superman included, were born from. Half of them have.
This is why people believe superheroes are fascist power fantasies, when they're the opposite.
One half of the audience cannot fathom this alienation, therefore they cannot fathom the 'average man' as someone alienated and dejected from the rest of the world. They cannot fathom that when that person receives power they then would use it to raise up those around them and help heal the world's woes.
For said half, getting powers like that means you're "above everyone else", it means you're exerting your power over people in an authoritarian way, enforcing your will with your "superiority".
Yet the message of superhero comics is the opposite. The message is that everyone has some sort of 'power', even if it's not a superpower you might be good at building houses or communicating with people.
The power does not make you superior. Even with your power, you ain't shit. You're as divine and as terrible as every other human being. Whether you're remembered as a superhero or supervillain is entirely dependent on how you use your powers, how you deal with the shittiness of life.
Do you use your power responsibly, to help and heal and work hard, to love? Like Superman.
Or do you use your power irresponsibly, to harm and further your own selfish intentions? Like Loki.
The exploration of power, morality, and where each character falls on the scale of "villain/ hero/neutral/anti-hero/anti-villain". Villains have moments of heroism, heroes have moments where they have to confront their own darkness.
Yet if you're not coming from this "alienated person finally getting a leg up, what do they do with it" perspective, all you see are people with powers that others don't have imposing their idea of "right". And that's just not how the genre works, it's not the idea behind it
>They cannot fathom that when that person receives power they then would use it to raise up those around them and help heal the world's woes.
Something Something. Power corrupts absolute power corrupts yadda yadda yadda
Yadda yadda
they can't cope with clark
>what is trolling
newbie