>Terrible, yes but great

>Terrible, yes… but great
What the FRICK did he mean by this?

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What a chud

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Great as in large or immense, he used it in the pejorative sense

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Was Voldemort a big guy?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lol

      Was Voldemort a big guy?

      idiot

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      gimmie some sneed

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Learn English b***h

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    God damn the first 3 to 4 are comfy (or cozy, if you prefer). Gonna need to do a rewatch soon.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >God damn the first 3 to 4 are comfy (or cozy, if you prefer). Gonna need to do a rewatch soon.
      They really should've been doing 2 movies per book starting at book 4.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The first 2 movies are amazing, 3 and 4 are decent but nothing spectacular. After that it's total shit to the end.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Absolute and undeniable truth.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yeah but emma watson is hot in the last few. peds need not apply.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Correct.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The first 2 movies are amazing, 3 and 4 are decent but nothing spectacular. After that it's total shit to the end.

      morons , 6 is the greatest of the series followed by 7 part 1 . Thats the truth.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Mental handicap

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    was he referring to Ivan the Terrible

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He's making a distinction between the moral goodness of an action and the uniqueness, difficulty, or impact of an action. An action can display extraordinary skill, talent, or ability while still being evil. I understood what Ollivander meant when I was reading this book in 2nd grade, so your confusion suggests you're an ESL student, underage, or a mental moron.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I'm not saying what Voldemort did was right or wrong, but it worked. It just worked.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >t. Todd Howard

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He's clearly saying it was wrong.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Because he is obligated to. It's like how everyone who says something positive about Hitler prefaces it with "The holocaust was horrible but ..." or "He started the war, but ...." People know they are obligated to say this stuff.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Obligate deez nuts.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Great doesn't mean "even more good."

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Trying to gauge Harry’s receptiveness to ethnic cleansings.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He was noting that while Voldemort was evil he was still based, and deep down the muggles(AKA trannies) deserved the hate

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >After all, what Hitler did was great.
    >Terrible, yes.... But great.
    What did TJKD Rowling mean by this?

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    But what exactly did Voldemort do aside from Avada Cadabr-ing a bunch of people?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This line was written before Rowling came up with Avada Cadavra and before Voldemort became the president of a social club for racists. In the first book he was depicted more as an evil wizard who was exploring the very limits of human existence, trying to cheat death, and his activities before he was defeated were left vague enough that the reader could imagine any number of outlandish things.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Frick, I've never seen anyone put it properly into words like this, but you are entirely right.
        This is part of why books 1 through 3 feel so special.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >they are better because J K Rowling was able to avoid exposing her mediocrity by doing any actual worldbuilding

          so much of media relies on people like you with your basement-level expectations.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >exposition = good writing
            You are moronic and/or autistic.
            Also, I don't believe for a second that Rowling wrote any of the early books.
            Probably none of them. She's just a corpo face for a group of ghost writers.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >exposition
              you literally said you projected a good backstory onto Voldemort. she doesn't need to write, you imagine a better story for her and then attribute it to her, like some kind of cult follower. I doubt you could recognize good writing if you got a large multi-volume series shoved up your ass.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >you literally said
                I "literally" didn't, both because I'm not that anon, and because that anon literally did no such thing.
                What was cool/scary/mysterious about the dark lord, is the fact that he is alien and unknowable. An almost animistic spirit of the dark, like a demon, or a concept.
                Once we learn he is just some seething baldie clown with a little troupe of weirdos, the magic is gone.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >fear death so much you decide to literally damn your soul so that you can "never" be killed
        >instead of trying to replicate the philosopher's stone (if some random nerd could do it, surely the greatest dark wizard ever and one of the top 5 of all time could too)
        >end up living less than half the usual wizard life expectancy
        Tom Riddle was fricking moronic.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      (Re)invented ressurection?
      Learn to fly?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      he listened, and that's what no one else did.

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    he was under the imperias curse and was being a double agent for voldermaut

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it's been postulated

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He's talking about Hitler.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Voldemort could
    >cast powerful wandless wordless magic
    >fly with no help
    >cheat death multiple times
    >read minds
    >lots of other shit
    He was pretty great.

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Terrible in the same style of Ivan the Terrible

    He had to say great because idiots wouldnt get it

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    maaan i wish i had me one of them vibrating brooms when i was a little girl

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >9/11, looked at what they accomplished with no weapons and just 11 guys who didn't even speak English
    >and that proves that sometimes great ideas are actually horrible ideas

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Terrible the way they killed all those mudbloods
    >but isn’t it great that there are no more mudbloods?

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Gabrielle Delacour as my wife

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      hold on i just looked her up now and i take it back. cursed bong genes...

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A person can do great things and be reviled. Look at Bonaparte or Alexander the Great. They were drenched in blood but they also shaped the course of history.

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Voldemort had a lot of admirers in the wizarding world, and JK doesn't do a great job of playing with the grey area there and instead just cartoonizes them as Death Eaters. If you read the deep lore, which regretfully I have done, it does get fleshed out a bit.

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It meant he was the Wizard of Oz

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    not great, not terrible.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *