The big 4 of Western Animation

The big 4 of Western Animation

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What no Mickey?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Fred stick out like sore thumb, he's irrelevant nowadays.

      Those are Warner characters only.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I could tell

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      damn straight, no mickey.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Batman and Fred don't belong there.

      Mickey should replace Batman, and Homer replace Fred.

      >No Mickey
      >No Woody Woopecker
      >No Tom and Jerry
      >No Snoopy

      Clearly, this is WB propaganda, and it's also old, circa mid 90's, so Spongebob hasn't been invented yet.

      Anons, it's a merchandise piece, it's not real.
      They didn't really replace U.S. Presidents by cartoon characters on mount Rushmore

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Trump should be on Rushmore

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          who?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          He could afford to put it on there if he actually wanted to.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Back when Batman was allowed to smile.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >batman
    >smiling
    How unnerving.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why did Hanna-Barbera allow to be absored by Warner Bros? Both of them were still alive.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Batman and Fred don't belong there.

    Mickey should replace Batman, and Homer replace Fred.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Batman and Fred don't belong there.
      The both pioneered comics and tv animation. I'd switch Scooby with Tom &Jerry

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        MGM mogs warner at the time so yeah.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Real talk Mickey is about as irrelevant today as Fred is. Bugs and Scooby still get new shitsemi-frequently, I think Mickey unironically has more Cinemaphile appearances of cultural note in the last few years.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Just because you don't watch new Mickey cartoons doesn't mean they don't exist.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why are the Spielberg characters there? They're not exactly old WB and HB characters

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >No Mickey
      >No Woody Woopecker
      >No Tom and Jerry
      >No Snoopy

      Clearly, this is WB propaganda, and it's also old, circa mid 90's, so Spongebob hasn't been invented yet.

      It's promo art for the 1996 Time Warner-Turner merger that brought Warner Bros. and Hanna-Barbera under one roof.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >No Mickey
    >No Woody Woopecker
    >No Tom and Jerry
    >No Snoopy

    Clearly, this is WB propaganda, and it's also old, circa mid 90's, so Spongebob hasn't been invented yet.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    In reality it would be Donald, Bugs, Popeye and Tom.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Which one's Roosevelt? As in, the one who's only up there because they know the artist?

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Cartoon characters come to life
    >Their first act would be to desecrate native american lands with carvings of their faces

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Feels kinda weird seeing spielberg's characters standing alongside hanna-barbera's. Don't see that often in official promo art.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Bugs makes sense. Batman makes less sense. Fred and Scooby make no sense.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Call me a zoomer but I feel like Spongebob should be replacing Fred at this point.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    KINO

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Superman only gets a cameo on the poster

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >another WBgay's wishful thinking thread
    yawn.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *