>the CIA destabilized minority neighborhoods by selling coke
Anybody else find it weird how the Boys keeps making fun of “conspiracy theories” then outright claims this conspiracy theory is true?
>the CIA destabilized minority neighborhoods by selling coke
well this one is actually true so I don't see the problem
How did they force it to be sold in only black neighbourhoods?
Were the black gangs and drug dealers part of the CIA too?
Yes. US law enforcement also murders black men to harvest their pituitary glands to sell to pharmaceuticals and planned parenthood convinces black mothers to kill their infants so their body parts can be sold to make beauty products.
Yes stupid.
Bloods+crips are an antiblack terrorist designed to destabilize control and collapse the black community from within.
Simple, they would only sell it to drug dealers who operated in minority areas and not to those who operated in white areas. A drug dealer in Harlem isn't gonna try and sell drugs in the suburbs.
And they pushed it hard while killing other drug type dealers. Worse the eliminated far more benign and even positive illegal drug cultures.
they targeted poor neighborhoods which were mostly black, back then nobody knew what crack was, black people had terrible lives and they suddenly he's about some powder that makes you less depressed. Also CIA themselves admitted that they did it, they also outlawed weed for the sole reason of raiding homes of Mexican people
Give them the drugs, and let the money do the work. The CIA then uses their cut to do all kinds of black ops. The crazy thing is that people think this kind of thing stopped. The CIA is involved in all kinds of shit. Arms, drugs, child sex trafficking, You need to do your reps anon. Freeway Rick Ross. Iran Contra. The Franklin Cover-up. That's just the tip of the iceberg
Minority =/= Black.
What year do you think it is?
They’re pretty clear they’re talking about blacks in the show. If you haven’t watched it, don’t talk about it
Could be.
That's the disinfo part of the conspiracy narrative designed to make you disbelieve it. The truth is that the CIA aided cartels in transport and distribution along with running interference against other law enforcement agencies, but they didn't actually control the consumer level sales. Crack took off in poor neighborhoods and communities because it was cheap as hell compared to pretty much anything, and Black neighborhoods are more likely to be poor. Once you adjust for economic brackets and availability of crack the usage rates between minority and White neighborhoods and communities converge. This is compounded by the separate issue of legal system bias against minorities, particularly in regards to how the police handled the War on Drugs.
tl;dr:
>CIA helps cartels smuggle drugs into the USA
>crack is really fricking cheap
>poor people buy crack
>minorities tend to be poor
>legal system disfavors minorities and the poor
>claiming the CIA sold crack to Black people is an obfuscation tactic
>legal system disfavors minorities and the poor
You left out penalties for crack were more severe than for powder cocaine.
That's baked in, as cocaine is a rich person's drug.
That’s just when you look at convictions, you’re right that crack is a poor black persons drug so the convictions for people who have it are typically also charged for something else along side it, if you compare it to meth (typically the poor white persons drug of choice) the sentences are similar.
"Legal systems are biased against minorities" is a funny way of saying "13/50"
But please, go on bleating about "Institutional Racism"
Yeah
No, the Nixon administration also targeted hippies. So they could conduct drug raids on them. It was to destabilize majority democrats areas.
>Conspiracy theories are only true when it’s my side
I mean its not like the CIA hasn't faced allegations of drug trafficking within and without of the americas for the better part of 60 years
oh wait
Because it's not a theory.
Because it's well-documented that this is exactly what happened. Go cry in /misc/.
>Because it's well-documented that this is exactly what happened. Go cry in /misc/.
Ah, so every unproven conspiracy theory is true now. Thank you lefty/misc/ moron sama for proving /misc/ right
That's not what they're saying, but whatever you need to tell yourself to satisfy your schizophrenic delusions.
>hurr durr le israelites le doesn't own everything you le chud hurr durr get real
>btw this here cum-stained document that says dem CIA people rape the black people is all true OK
>no i will not give source durr
Why are they always like this?
>if you think this, you must also think all of this shit
Are Americans really this deeply brainwashed into their team sport politics?
Yes, they are.
Oh the irony of these 2 moron.
learn english before making non-arguments
>making non-arguments
oh the irony
Yes. Thats why I dont respect them
>le joos
Obsessed
>le cia
Obsessed
No fricker, this one is. Just like MK-Ultra, or how the ATF manufactured a reason to go after the Brach Davidians because they needed a pr coup after fricking up at Ruby Ridge.
Anon. Calling it a conspiracy theory doesn't make it untrue.
Reactions like yours usually indicate that you ate worried about people thinking about it seriously.
moron
Yes we all know the feds run part of the narco trade alongside the cartels and mexican government
>that can't be!!! why would the glowies get involved in a multi-billion dollar trade?!?
Literally wake up, neo.
they literally admitted to doing it
Because they quite literally admitted to it, years after the fact.
>we can believe the feds when they admit to something bad
>this couldn't possibly be part of a pysop
Stuff like this is why everyone suspect the CIA of everything. And they only have themselves to blame.
The CIA destroyed entire governments just to sell coke & other hard drugs to Americans to raise funds for their clandestine programs.
They are also the one filling the streets with weapons, illegal firearms, hard drugs like Heroin, OxyContin & Fentanyl
My favourite recent one was Afghanistan. Oh those Langley boys, they just can't do without a Laudenum pickmeup in the afternoon.
That's not a conspiracy theory, that's a conspiracy fact.
Okay, real late night/early morning hours talk: what's the glowies' game here?
If they're just going to fricking brag about their ops and their plots and their plans, all that ultimately does is destabilize the home front.
Maybe they have this vision of them being the "big, bad CIA," but if you gradually piss off a larger and larger segment of the domestic population, how doesn't that end with Langley getting its very own special edition of the storming of the Bastille?
If you are going to rub everyone's noses in "ho ho ho we are the evil puppetmasters," how safe is that? Like, how secure do you think you are, and how secure are you REALLY?
It seems spectacularly foolish for the spooky black ops organization to brag about their ops. Because they may think "We can say and do what we want, you won't do shit." But the entire history of civilization is that people don't do shit... until they do. And then everything changes in the blink of an eye.
The CIA is high on its own supply. They believe themselves to be untouchable because, for the entire cold war, they were. They could just do whatever they wanted and, because they're the CIA, they did not have to ask permission from anyone else or tell the rest of the government what they were doing. They have been this was since they were the OSS.
Exactly. Man, I look forward to the day when their HQ gets stormed, the agents gunned down and left to writhe in their own blood, and their field-agents getting burned via doxxing.
The CIA were still taking orders from Bush Sr. and the Republicans wanted to solidify their power structure by getting all the racists on their side and get white middle america afraid of black people. The War on Drugs was specifically set up so they could claim any black political organization was a gang and make arrests.
Another example is how evangelicals didn't give a shit about abortion until Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson were getting forced to desgregate their church colleges and needed an issue to get northern churches to go along with them.
>The War on Drugs was specifically set up so they could claim any black political organization was a gang and make arrests.
It was also so that they could take down the anti-war left, since hippies also did a bunch of drugs.
Well it all kind of blew up in their faces, didn't it?
Not really, since even the biggest CIA skeptic will take their side when someone suggests they fricked with a minority simply because they're racist against that minority.
Just look at this thread.
Because its devoid of any kind of verisimilitude, why would the feds care about race? The only argument people like you have is
>THEY WERE AFRAID OF DA MIGHT OF BLACK ORGANIZATIONS
which is fricking laughable.
The feds care about power. Power in the United States was and still is mostly held by white people, and black organizations threatened that status quo, especially since many of them had left-leaning sympathies.
Normal white people are more of a threat than ragtag groups of morons who can barely exist wihout desappearing into their own asses.
They don't give a shit about either?
White people could be threat if they, in mass, actually want to change the status quo. Instead they will most likely stand side by side with the police and any government force to prevent change
You can say the same thing about blacks anon, beyond the fact that EVERY instance of “diversity” has been enforced at the barrel of a government gun. What did BLM actually accomplish BEYOND getting the writer of the 93 crime bill (a bill that has the bulk of the problems that they were claiming to protest against) and a LITERAL corrupt cop elected? Both sides can’t do shit divided, and every single time someone tries to get the groups together they either end up dead or disavowed by the powers that be. Every group has sins and every group is being oppressed by the powers that be
You should see the makeup of the US Army officers. It's hilariously majority black.
>why would the feds care about race?
Are you moronic?
>why would the feds care about race?
Are you actually this fricking stupid?
Not him but feds see any type of change as a potential existential threat. You seem to forget that they had fingers in and tried to disrupt the civil rights movement, gay rights movement, native American rights movement, new religious movements, sovereign citizen's movement, green activist and animal welfare groups, white power groups, back power groups, and the list goes on and on and on.
That's not conspiracy theories, they flat out admit it.
They also inflitrate white organizations like the KKk and the Hells Angels, its nothing special
He mentioned that, do you know how to read??
Ironically all because Hoover didn't want to admit he was gay
The early gay rights movement was like 90% pedophiles though. And I don't mean "ew gays are pedos" I mean unironic, man-boy love supporting wealthy MAPs. Or were those the feds LARPing?
Probably feds. Feds are like 90% pedos
It’s less that and more about keeping the status quo.
The KKK are terrorists, and that’s bad to them.
Minority groups uniting to change the system the legal system they operate in is also bad. Black people weren’t the only minority group they targeted.
I think it's because it goes against their "the government loves black people and hates white people" white genocide ideals, which are laughable at best.
>Not really
Abortion has become an issue that could legitimately balkanize the United States and plunge us into destructive conflict. It's an issue that has huge sections of America practically at each others' throats. Was that in Langley's plans?
Majority of the country is in favor of right to abortion. It’s a vocal minority that is intentionally pushing anti-abortion as a major political issue and through several decades turn it into us vs them ideological issue, purely for political power.
Just like slavery back in the day...
It's slightly deeper than that. Yes, most people are in favor of the right to abortion. No, most people would not personally get an abortion in the event of an unexpected pregnancy. The problem with Roe v Wade is that it wasn't a democratic decision. It was a mandate handed down from on high, and overturning it doesn't mean the instant banning of abortion everywhere, it simply gives the democratic right to vote on the issue back to the people. On an individual level I'm also in favor of abortion rights, but I'm boggled as to why the "democrats" in the US are so against their states deciding for themselves. In the end I think they don't care about anyone's rights at all, and it's a purely political move. They fear it will lose them footholds of power in moderate states as minorities move away from those states to more liberal states to guarantee their abortion rights.
>and overturning it doesn't mean the instant banning of abortion everywhere, it simply gives the democratic right to vote on the issue back to the people
Republicans have plenty of trigger laws in place, made specifically to automatically ban abortion when Roe gets overturned.
> I'm boggled as to why the "democrats" in the US are so against their states deciding for themselves
Maybe it has something to do with the fact republicans aren’t willing to just let it be an individual state matter. They already make laws that allows prosecution for people helping someone to get an abortion even if you go to another state where it’s legal. They openly talk about federal ban on aboriginal now. They also want to ban aboriginal with no exceptions to ectopic pregnancy, rape or incest. There’s even talk to making it illegal to go to another state/country for abortion.
And you don’t even acknowledge the fact that people will die because doctors will be too afraid to help women having miscarriage because they might be prosecuted for doing an abortion. It’s already happening in some places. Doctors are going “NOPE!” and refusing to treat someone immediately because they got to cover their ass.
>And you don’t even acknowledge the fact that people will die because doctors will be too afraid to help women having miscarriage because they might be prosecuted for doing an abortion.
How many people, do you suppose? As many as will die in conservative states 16-18 years from the banning of abortion when a massive wave of new unwanted children come of age and become criminals? The banning of abortion is entirely unintuitive from the perspective of your conservatives and their political power as well. They ban abortion, and in one generation they have millions more minorities, liberal voters, their crime skyrockets, etc. It makes no sense on either side for them to support the argument they do, and in the end their voters are convinced, like you, with petty emotional arguments like "muh back alley abortions might kill a few people"
>doctors will be too afraid to help women having miscarriage because they might be prosecuted for doing an abortion.
yea, it sure would be terrible for people to be arrested for their political beliefs in america.
>healthcare is a political opinion
Do burgers really?
>voluntarily killing healthy fetuses because you're irresponsible and don't want the the accountability is "healthcare"
do insane moloch worshipers really?
The Bible has explicit instructions in it for preforming abortions. Have you even read your own book?
bible says life is conceived with first breath, according to bible a fetus doesn't have a life nor a soul
>get white middle america afraid of black people
You don't need war or protest to be afraid of black people
>whitw on hispanic almost as higb as black on white.
What did we do to you senor?
You need to get your eyes checked, Diego
>falling for their bait
What I'm learning from this is that even violent whites and latinos stay the frick away from black people.
The whole war on drugs started to criminalize groups who opposed to the viet war, those beings hippies (associated with weed and acid) and the black panthers (associated with heroin and also weed)
glowies are full of SJWs and are no longer in control
are you saying SJWs can't be glowies?
they can
they're just not as good
SJWism innately corrupts an individual's ability to percieve reality, because it's an ideology of lenses.
This is not a desirable trait in an "intelligence agent".
I am of the mind that some ideologies are essentially memetic viruses released to handicap their adherents.
See: how the British sheltered Karl marx while he developed his ideology, before releasing him upon The Continent; this was the final terrible act that ended "The Great Game" between Britain and old Tsarist Russia.
But the weapon became uncontrollable.
The cleanup might take centuries.
Because it’s actually factually true.
Bunch of morons in this thread.
No, its never been proven that they targeted minorities; they just lost coke while doing covert operations and it ended up being sold in black neighborhoods because they are the ones who buy that shit; Libtards somehow construe this as confirmation that blacks were targeted.
That's it, that's your lame conspiracy.
>white people don’t do coke
Come on, dude.
not at the rate that blacks do, no
It has been statistically proven that white and black people consume drugs at similar rates, and since there's more white people than black people, whites are a bigger market. The only disparity is when it comes to actual arrests and sentencing.
guess which race smokes crack in the open
Guess which demographic is poorer and thus easier to kick around and over police and demonize for political clout?
Funny how poor people of other races dont have this problem
But they do. Black people historically just get the major brunt of it due to how society has kept discriminating them.
Notice the difference in how conservatives treat drug problems in black communities to how they treat the opioid crisis in the mostly white rural America.
Yeah, suddenly when white people and family members started having major addiction issues we went from “lock them up!” to “this is a sickness, it doesn’t make sense to lock people up for decades”.
>it doesn’t make sense to lock people up for decades
its overwhelmingly democrats who say shit like this
Difference is that democrats say it about all drug users, while conservatives only say it about white people addicted to opioids.
No, republicans still want to lock up hobos as always, its only the democrats who are talking about shit like harm reduction
But if it’s grandma, they’re ok with rehab, etc. Conservatives have only turned their view slightly if it happens to impact people they personally know.
>people care more about their family than some rando on the street
I know its hard for terminal commies to understand but theres nothing wrong about that you know?
It actually is, because what you’re describing is narrow minded, navel gazing frick the common good, I care only about myself mentality which does nothing to fix bigger problems in society which ultimately will end up impacting your life as well. So the smart way, especially in long term, would be to address and fix them before the problem is too big, instead of telling everyone to frick off, not my problem.
Sure, but not caring about their family won't automatically make them more empathic to strangers and has nothing to do with race.
except they do, ever seen the drug usage in Slavic and Balkan countries?
>It has been statistically proven that white and black people consume drugs at similar rates
You literally don't have any proof of this
It’s science, chud.
I'd post links, but I know you'd dismiss them as biased or whatever. Google is right there if you ever become interested in facts.
Because black apologists never dismiss statistics right?
Coke isn’t a black people drug
Nor was weed until the 80’s
>they just lost coke while doing covert operations and it ended up being sold in black neighborhoods because they are the ones who buy that shit
Does anyone actually believe this idiocy?
What reasons do you have to believe otherwise, other than persecution bias?
the very real and literal documents that have been FOIA'd and made publicly available
I have a very real and literally documented affair with your mother.
i don't know why people still side with the feds, they will refuse to find culprits who bomb Christian churches yet they will investigate garage pulls
>you have to side with the feds or ghetto trash
I choose neither
Lolol
I love how easy it is to erect strawBlack folk to silence thought and how effective it is.
I now want an edit of this comic with a CIA agent instead of the wizard and coke instead of the shotguns.
Oh yeah, I'm sure the coke just fell off the back of a truck.
there are literally FOIA'd documents disproving this
I don't know why you don't trust an agency to be honest but then you trust them to hand out legitimate documents to civilians.
Those two things seem at odds.
Does the FoIA somehow prevent altering documents before they're released?
It might, I'm not asking rhetorically. I honestly don't know.
...why would they alter the documents to make them look bad?
no, FOIA does not prevent altering documents, and this is evident from the fact that like 80% of foia'd documents are entirely blacked out and redacted. they are fine releasing foia'd documents because it is part of an information flood based on russian propaganda theory- they can tell us they killed god himself but it would get buried, people wouldn't believe it, etc
>...why would they alter the documents to make them look bad?
To give fodder to extremists so they can further divide the populace into smaller, more easily controlled groups?
Basically divide and conquer class-warfare.
What? By doing this they give people a legitimate grievance against the state, not their fellow workers
they could be doing it as part of large scale entrapment measures, flame terror, infiltrate cell, "make arrests"
That shit stoked racism, you can see it in this thread.
Either from "Government is white people's fault" or "it was just the black people being dumb and poor".
And racism separates workers. Smaller groups can't enact change like big groups can.
>Either from "Government is white people's fault"
Who said that in this thread?
>duuude Im just asking questions!!!
i do trust them to be honest, just not at the time of their actions. delayed honesty. they're ozymandias telling us about the trigger 35 minutes too late. there is nothing we can do, so there is no longer reason to hide.
The Boys is a blatant allegory for US intelligence agencies or glowies. They might look God-fearing and patriotic on the surface, but they are satanic and treacherous on the inside
>claims this conspiracy theory is true?
It literally is
cocaine was and still is a popular drug sold through all communities, yet "minority" communities are somehow the only ones "destabilized" because of it?
Whites just needed different drugs like opiates and meth
One thing I never understood. The US government gives billions of dollars to tons of governments and anti-government rebels that align with US interests all the time. Why did the Regan Administration need to sell arms to their enemy Iran and deal with drugs in order to finance the Contras instead of doing it "legally"?
Because the Reagan administration no longer could support Contras directly due to the Boland Amendment being passed.
Because Congress wouldn't approve giving aid to the Contras because they were considered too extreme due to all the murders and human rights abuses they'd done when in power.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viola_Liuzzo
> At the age of 39, while driving back from a trip shuttling fellow activists to the Montgomery airport, she was fatally hit by shots fired from a pursuing car containing Ku Klux Klan members Collie Wilkins, William Eaton, Eugene Thomas, and Gary Thomas Rowe, the last of whom was actually an undercover informant working for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
> In an effort to deflect attention from having employed Rowe as an informant, the FBI produced disinformation[5][6] for politicians and the press, stating that Liuzzo was a member of the Communist Party, heroin addict,[7] and had abandoned her children to have sexual relationships with African-Americans involved in the Civil Rights Movement.[8]
Just federal agency things.
I'm sure minority neighborhoods are openly destabilized and don't need any CIA or conspiracy.
So you're an ethnographer?
Nobody has explained how exactly they made sure it was strictly sold to only blacks?
Whites did a ton of coke in the eighties. So how exactly are you certain they didn’t buy it and sell it?
Just seems like another excuse for why blacks have failed to uplift themselves compared to others. Must always be someone else’s fault.
I did explain to you
Again, they would sell it to dealers that operated out of black neighbourhoods. Drug dealers operate in turfs so they'd have a hard time selling outside their territory, although I'm sure that some of those drugs probably ended up in white neighbourhoods anyway.
Supply was sold to dealers that operated in black neighborhoods in the city, making direct access bigger to black people than white yuppies living in suburbs. Obviously white people bought coke too but it was harder to find dealers if you weren’t from the same neighborhood and thus knew who dealed.
And is there a tangent proof that it was done because they targeted black neighborhoods for the reasons of racism? Or was it just because that's WHERE THE DEALERS FRICKING WERE?
>” We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news.”
>quoting a israelite that went to jail for Watergate
Sure, totally trustworthy. Yeah.
>source??
>yeah sure here’s a guy saying that they did it and here’s how it happened
>nah that doesn’t count because for reasons
Okay buddy sure
guess we now have to believe everything evey schizo who has worked for the government at some point claims
>every schizo who has worked for the government
>very literally advisor to the president who began the operations that we are discussing
youre a moron. literally moronic.
Yes anon, the powder just magically fell into the lap of urban blacks when the conservative government that enabled that drug to circulate in the first place was simultaneously clamping down hard on people using drugs and locking them up for decades for drug possession to disfranchise an opposition voting block.
>thing happened which didn't benefit me so it was obviously orchestated by the people I dislike
literal neonazi logic
Just started reading the boys and the edgy content reminds me of that one comic showing X-men being all sexually abused by Charles Xavier btw anyone know the source of that or something to find it again?
Its issues #23–30 and the arc is collected as "We Gotta Go Now"
How do people that consider themselves redpilled and smarter than the average person fall for same tricks?
>distrusting feds means you have to believe in moronic black victimhood narratives
No, and Palestine can frick off along with Israel too
>"I don't believe the government" he says while citing government information
you see the government information that allign with my views are true while everything else is wrong, I am devoid of critical thinking.
>you see the government information that allign with my views are true while everything else is wrong,
This but unironically
hmm people that aren't actively sabotaged by government doesn't have to commit crimes, how surprising.
>hmm people that aren't actively sabotaged by government
proof?
I dunno. maybe the 2 century of slavery, trafficking drugs to black neighborhoods, refusing to give them good, services and other basic necessities for decades, forceing them to live in distant neighborhoods with terrible living conditions and away from places of interest. History if America is built on opressing any non white person to gain wealth.
I'm sorry your too incapable of actually learning history, go leave and keep learning the world through a tube
where do you get your information from?
Information that the government tried to cover up for decades and only came about due to multiple investigations is not the same thing.
Fricking Black folk in here can't give me a comic but are happy to worship minorities and gay politics neck yourselves
I don't believe in this shit but it will be bad for some people I hate if everyone starts to believe it, which I guess I take some solace in. It's still fricking stupid though.
I like how we're in the point of american history where the american government can release documents that go "yeah.. we did it... what are you gonna do about it homosexual" and people will still deny it.
From testing drugs on black people to arming south american citizens, they don't care.
of course they do, because it goes against their narrative, the can't criticize the one day of thinking to save their lives
They never said anything about selling cocaine in black neighborhoods tho; the official version is that they lost a shitton of coke they exported from Venezuela during a cover mission and people drew their own conclusions from that.
they HAVE there are FOIA'd DOCUMENTS!!! GOOGLE IT
The modern American is unironically this easily brainwashed. The CIA won already, and these morons are the most useful idiots on the planet.
It's very telling when people only believe conspiracy theories when they're finally proven beyond a single doubt and mainstream. Considering the subject matter, it's a miracle if you get a document from the government saying "yeah we did this lol" to prove something right. Obviously I'm not saying you have to go full on flat earth 5G homosexual waves just because you're skeptical but it's weird to be open to one thing but call literally anything else a "conspiracy theory" like it must be inherently wrong just for being one. It's very normie behaviour because if that miracle does happen in like six months, you'll pretend you knew it all along.
>thing didn't happen
>yes it did
>nuh uh
>yuh huh
The CIA wouldn't have to exist if people just did what the government wants them to do.
>the modern Black person isnt affected by slavery
Lol you're moronic
Black people still largely live in neighborhoods with higher concentration of environmental toxins, and shit like lead exposure which affects cognitive ability, as a direct result of historical segregation and city planning policies that intentionally cut off non-white areas from the white population and forced them live in shittier areas, which are often on land that in the past was exposed to industrial wastes and contaminants that were never properly cleaned up. Or they’re areas that are next to factories and thus more directly exposed to the pollution caused by said factories still operating.
Are we at least adressing that black people are apparently moronic from lead exposure? Thats sounds like a good first step
Environmental contaminants is a factor in many why some people do worse, it doesn’t mean everyone from the group suffers from say lead poisoning, etc. Other reasons are intentional gutting of the public school sector and lack of resources, poor families cannot help their children study as well and offer support because they have to work multiple jobs, etc. The type of racist bullshit about black people being dumb because they don’t test well is not genetic, it’s partially a result of various policies dictated by the white majority.
The only reason Republicans are now against abort is because they know that it's overwhelmingly the poor that have unwanted pregnancies. Now guess where the majority of our soldiers are recruited from.
This doesnt explains why religious people from other countries are also overwhelmingly against abortion
Plenty of churches in the US were pro-abortion before republicans created the modern evangelical anti-abortion movement.
source?
>you're moronic
>"correct."
not an argument
>thread discussing the corruption of the CIA and their obvious discrimination
>suddenly gets drowned out my CIA apologists
I've never seen such an obvious glowie thread
>CIA: Oops, we "accidentally" sold a bunch of drugs to our citizens
>Leftards: That obviously means black people because otherwise we would have to ask ourselves hard questions about them, and if you disagree you are a glowie
>leftards
You tipped your hand a little too hard there, glowie.
>its okay to be a paranoid moron when we do it
typical leftard
Nice post, Agent Langley
>all this schizoids
Purely fiction didn't happen just trust me bro
Correct me if im wrong (not american) but arent most poor whites located in rural towns while minorities overwhelmingly inhabit urban areas?? It makes sense that the black community would have more problems with crime and drugs considering that big cities are a much bigger market for illegal stuff, are generally more expensive to live in and the police is more active and numerous
I think it’s more that white people make their own drugs and don’t need the cia to airdrop it
The CIA was also known to airdrop drugs in smaller towns.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Don_Henry_and_Kevin_Ives
But yes, I readily believe the CIA sold cocaine to poor people. Both for money, and because they wanted poor people to frick themselves over. And it was probably easier to funnel it into urban areas. But I do not believe that the CIA was specifically going out of their way to catalogue what blocks in harlem had more blacks because this was all about black people and think of the black people because everyone is always out to get black people.
holy shit you're dense as frick
see
see
>"rich" back neighborhoods are still poorer than poor white neighborhoods
you're literally proving there'd inequity among races
It's amazing how white nationalists will keep ignoring blatant reasons that causes problems among minorities and they will quote some pseudo science bs instead of coming in terms with the dark reality of their country being built on exploitation, oppression and just fricking over everyone
they were always the biggest bootlickers, they just like to project.
>Europe was built on le heckin Blacks being exploited
Africans had thousands of years to develop almost entirely untouched and never managed to do a single thing
I don’t know why you cult worship and bootlick Blacks so hard as your life goal but the sooner they accept responsibility and you realize they can never be self-sustaining on their own outside very basic tribe communities the better
Do you think we developed on our own or something? European medicine was imported from egypt, our math from the arabs, our writing from meds, half our tech from the far east and our religion from the israelites. We were positioned at the crossroads of three continents and still didnt develop as fast as the native americans who were less than 2000 years behind us despite a 3000 year handicap. Riding africa's dick as if they didnt produce some of the oldest and richest civilizations on earth is just absurd. Plus, didnt ethiopia beat the romans? Technically twice?
None of these are Africans and taking ideas and building upon them isn’t exploitation
>egypt ethiopia and mali were/are not african
American education at its finest. And my point wasnt that stealing tech is exploitation, but that you shouldnt suck your own dick that hard when you basically just get handed everything then coincidentally get prompted to develop seagoing ships by a foreign trade issue
Also, colonialism and mass slavery arent exploitation?
There is a reason they are used as the “we wuz” meme countries, and that’s because they are considered far closer culturally and ethnically to the Middle East. Same as calling Elon African American when he’s white
>Also, colonialism and mass slavery aren’t exploitation
Europe was already developed before that happened
So the roman empire wasn't imperialist and didn't have mass slavery, gotcha. By the way europeans living outside of rome weren't more developed than the africans
So Egypt/Africa/Asia wasn't imperialist and didn't have mass slavery, gotcha
>who were less than 2000 years behind us despite a 3000 year handicap
What? Are you saying that native americans were in some sort of stasis for 3000 years?
>our math from the arabs
I never understood this one.
Greeks were doing math before
Number were used in India before (and some variations very early Egypt as they also did complex math)
But why does the credit continuously go to Arabs as if they invented this shit?
Is it a question of form/style?
They invented the arabic numeral system we use and the concept of 0
>the concept of 0
And what does that mean, exactly?
Because ancient egyptians also a symbol for zero, Is that different from the concept of 0?
Oh no some tribesmen decided to just chill out and live harmoniously with nature somehow this is le bad because i am unable to conceive how people can live so differently from my biased standards... Guess what natives from north america and the amazons did the same while others like them, aztecs and incas for example, developed pretty advanced civilizations
>instead of coming in terms with the dark reality of their country being built on exploitation, oppression and just fricking over everyone
What does “coming to terms” with that mean?
Every single country is built on that you moron
>this thread
I AM SILLY!!1!!
Yes you are, but you can get better.
didnt know Cinemaphile stood for wienersuckers seeing how much black dick they munch for free
You aren't even white, /misc/ack moron.
And go back to your containment board.
You glow
Man I love how this show keeps on triggering without even trying
>without even trying
The Boys is the definition of tryhard.
It’s pretty embarrassing when you’re less subtle and more obnoxious than a Garth Ennis comic
>producer make show
>show exist to make money
>lot many people have money
>lot many people hate fat orange
>producer say he hate fat orange
>lot many people give money
Making sense now, cupcake?
>exists to make money
It’s an amazon show. It doesn’t matter how many people watch it.
Did you miss the billions they spent on making a lord of the rings show that’s already overwhelmingly hated? Pushing opinions is more important than something being good or popular
>It’s an amazon show. It doesn’t matter how many people watch it.
I don't think you understand how streaming services work.
Amazon Prime isn’t just a streaming service, dumbass.
beyond the fact that viewership simply is less important for amazon than other streamers, they have probably covered a huge chunk of production costs already with the rampant product placement this season. never forget that Man of Steel literally made a profit before release due to product placement.
Shut up chud.
Nani?
Does The Boys actually make fun of conspiracy theories though? They depict a world where corporations and the government cover up all of the shit involving supes, including secretely injecting babies with drugs for years and giving terrorists superpowers to justify more military intervention.
They do make fun of Stormfront's "white genocide" rants, even Homelander rolls his eyes at that one.
They literally had homelander ranting about the globalists and powerful figures in mainstream media trying to control people as if it was crazy.
Almost as if the people writing the show work in big media and are globalists
I interpreted that scene differently. Homelander wasn't crazy for saying that corporations and the media were controlling him, because the show makes it clear that it's true, they control the supes for the sake of branding and money. The Boys doesn't really have much to say about superheroes, most of the social commentary is about media and corporations. What makes Homelander crazy is that he believes he should be allowed to do whatever the frick he wants with no accountability.
I would say he's more crazy for deciding to play the game for the love rather than just going God mode on the world.
You’re giving the writers too much credit lmao
They also have starlight complaining that Hughie is “teaming up with a murderer”. When she herself is begging for a way to kill homelander. And last season she killed a random innocent guy for his car and said she didn’t feel guilty about it afterwards
The writers cannot even remember their own plot points
Wasn't this conspiracy literally debunked? I think the only source on this one was some guy that died in disgrace. I might be thinking of another one.
The CIA still had their hands in drug peddling though.
The CIA is involved of a lot of shady things. It would be no surprise if that was actually true. The only competent law enforcement department in America is the FBI anyway.
>call the CIA glowies and accuse them of all sorts of shit
>"oh but not this thing, they didn't propagate drugs in black communities"
I will never understand some of you
It’s the problem of attributing ALL
of the failings in black communities to the government that people find to be the problems. Everyone knows that the intelligence agencies target the American people to keep us dumb angry and weak, but and everyone knows that they sold drugs en mass to funnel illegal money into themselves, it’s just the annoyance that anyone can claim that all of their communities problems SOLELY come from outside forces that are the points of contention here. We need to band together to deal with these problems, not dick measure over who hates who more
Anon are you in the CIA? Because if not, how is it divisive to point out that the CIA has actively hindered black communities?
Because they did it to everyone, blacks ain't special.
>they only sold cracked to black people
>crackheads on of the most diverse group of drugged wrecks on the street
We already had this thread a week ago
read a fricking book you moron
What documents am I looking for if I want to see proof of the crack on black conspiracy?
Reagan’s war on drugs
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/allegationsofcia00unit.pdf
>If you ask the question, did the CIA sell drugs in the Black neighborhoods of Los Angeles to finance the Contra war, the answer will be a categorical no. The fact of the matter is we found no evidence whatsoever to suggest that there was a targeting of the African-American community. Cocaine in the mid 1980's and into the early 1990's was a perfect equal opportunity destroyer. We had addiction and problems in schoolyards across America. It didn't matter what color you were, where you were from, what your national origin was.
I only skimmed it, using ctrl-f to look for "African-American" in the document, but it does not seem like there is any evidence of the CIA targeting African-American neighbourhoods in particular in this. The document does concede that African-Americans may have been hit harder though.
So you’re a bigot
I can't deny that, this document isnt as strong as others as it does not delineate between crack and cocaine, which makes sense given its context. here are the documents referenced in that other document:
https://circumspectnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/4-CIA-Drugs-Webbs-DARK-ALLIANCE.pdf
they help to provide a more complete picture of how certain testimonies in the original doc may not be entirely accurate, or may have been pressured to be given.
unfortunately webb is probably some of the strongest written documentation you will see, but when paired with leaked memos and conversations from people like white house employees, it paints a strong argument
>the CIA destabilized minority neighborhoods by selling coke
Has this ever been proven to be true? It has always felt like it's something people say and accept as true because it absolves black people of any responsibility for drug use that devastated their community and frames a bad guy as being responsible for something bad.
I'm not even saying it's not plausible or anything, since the CIA were supporting the Contras and are constantly doing shady things, but I see it so casually thrown around without any actual proof or anything backing it up, with at best the Gary Webb "muh 2 shots in the back of the head" thing as a smoking gun of proof.
>Has this ever been proven to be true?
The CIA introduced coke to the country in order to fund the destabilization of several governments all over the world. That much is true. You can choose to be a naive person and believe the CIA did not expect the country to become addicted to crack cocaine in the future, but it wouldn't track.
>The CIA introduced coke to the country in order to fund the destabilization of several governments all over the world. That much is true
Where's the proof? This is what I mean as it being "something people say and accept as true". I'm not even saying it isn't true, I'm asking for documents or anything backing up these statements
>implying they didn't do the same thing with Oxys
they definitely did to sap from poor white communities to fund the iraq war machine with easy meat shields
I refuse to believe that the government is freakishly competent and omniscient, but only when it supports my world view, and are complete incompetent morons the rest of the time.
There was nothing competent or omniscient about it. Drug cartels were running the operations, CIA assets were mostly glorified smugglers and nannies. People have this insane view of the government in their head, where it's either a massive Orwellian machine or a collection of dumb boomers but both can be true.
I always thought that the bulk of government incompetence was just legalized money-laundering and cronyism.
Why spend 2million taxpayer bucks to build a... frick, I dunno, concrete box when you can spend 20 million, and the contractor can cheap out and spend 1 million dollars to make an inferior concrete box anyway because there's no quality mandates passed year one. If it crumbles in 20 years, that's someone else's problem / opportunity to make money.
>you have to be God to get poor people hooked on addictive substances
then stop being a moron and stop believing they are incompetent. thay arent. they never were
I love how this poster only cares because he wants to be able to blame poor black communities getting addicted to crack on their skin pigment and paint them as self-harmers and not victims.
Wow, what a completely moronic post. I wasn't blaming the black community because of their skin colour (expecially when the opioid crisis affected poor white communities in a similar way), I'm saying that people are willing to believe a narrative that provides a more comfortable explanation for reality than they are to verify it and make sure it's true in the first place.
It happens all the time (see /misc/ whenever they can work in a "muh joos" angle, any generation when blaming an older one, feminists blaming the "patriarchy" for anything), and I'd like people to actually verify their beliefs, rather than falling for "boogeyman narrative" where some malicious force is responsible for everything bad and you don't have to look into or understand thinngs any further. Not even to say that there isn't ever any validity to these claims either, but I'd prefer people to have informed and verifiable opinions, rather than just believing anything that fits into the boogeyman narratives I see so many people believe in.
Wasnt it crack?
Crack was also called cocaine and it became interchangeable
It was both though
Jesus Christ how it'd get to the point where there's this much obvious psyop shilling for the cia and posting the lowest possbile resolution boogeyman infographics on fricking Cinemaphile of all places. Goddamn I miss pre 2010 internet
>How'd it get to board seeders and mspaint schizo collages on Cinemaphile?
/misc/ is allowed to exist
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_CIA_drug_trafficking
leftypol=pol
>thread discussion about CIA wrongs
>suddenlly becomes a tribalistic race political discussion
Thread defused by the CIABlack folk, they are here.
Also, no, morons, its not about race, CIA infiltrated and destabilized major organized groups that could pose a threat to the State, they did the same with white groups like KKK as they did with Black Panthers.
They also infiltrated major media groups and private military companies and finance groups. They still do the same thing now with groups like proud boys or antifa.
i think one of the big differences is that the KKK has made a concerted and documented effort to infiltrate american government in order to normalize and enact their ideology (and they are very successful in this tact) and that the CIA has actively enabled and empowered them along the way, while they have not really done that in black communities
You got it wrong, it was not KKK using the government, its was the government using the KKK, the same they do with antifa today, they control and turn the group in to puppets that will never act against the government and only serve political purposes.
Because its not about race your ciaBlack person, its about government control and corruption and influence in american instituitions.
This tribalism is easy to use against people and its being used now
Anon c'mon didn't you read
The CIA investigated itself and found no wrongdoing. The multiple separate CIA agent memoir books that all tell the same story about purposefully selling contra drugs to black neighborhoods are just coincidence.
The CIA wouldnt do any of those things to white people.
They literally would and do
Why would the CIA do anything against an ethnic group they are largely a part of?
You're confusing ethnic for socio economic.
>implying for even a second your average CIA employee isnt in the same socioeconomic group as your average white
poor redneck?
are you confident they'd feel that way?
>the cia targeted blacks to make a profit
>but also blacks are usually very poor
>also there are very few of them
Please use your brain.
Organized crime is all about small transactions adding up. Plus, Ollie North was running a money laundering operation. The profits from drug sales were incremental.
It wasn't just about making money, dumbass. It was about destabilizing a demographic, and feeding people into the prison industrial complex
people forget that the war on drugs came on the heels of operation condor, in which the CIA realized they could absolutely reshape a people
They still do. MAGA definitely has origins in controlling white populations around populism.
I think the maga movement is less direct gov involvement and more the culmination of past efforts, previous efforts to bolster, fracture, etc white supremacy + trump led to lightning in a bottle that was then recapitalized on. i think they got lucky, and are now using it essentially.
things like proud boys are much more closely tied to direct gov involvement in my view, and groups like proudboys coalesced into the maga movement
Russia and other hostile actors have definitely contributed - there's a reason why Russia poured millions into the NRA and other political campaigns.
yes, correct. they were flooding astroturfed campaigns to loosely destabilize what are generally strong voting blocks and to swing the electoral college. it worked, and the war in ukraine was definitely not supposed to happen until the end of trumps second term, but unfortunately we will never address that as a nation because "it simply couldnt happen here." it is happening here.
To be fair, Russia would have failed regardless of the US President. We now know they were never set up to invade like the US did in Iraq. Russia has a good small military, but their macro is shit with no hopes of resupply.
to be fair, it wasnt supposed to be a war in the first place. it was supposed to be a US facilitated acquisition, and it absolutely would have worked under that guise.
True, Tucker Carlson i believe is the most watched tv guy in the US and he is just spouting russian talking points... They are doing the same shit here in my country supporting an ultra-orthodox fascist party of Qanonners and their affiliated organizations, the leader has known ties to russia
you polish?
>the most watched tv guy
That is not even close to true overall. Probably for cable news. His loyal audience is small.
im not going to claim he is THE most watched, but he is undeniably one of them:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/markjoyella/2022/05/17/fox-news-hits-65-consecutive-weeks-at-1-in-prime-time/?sh=7eab48dc6a64
sorry, meant to add, yes for cable specifically, which is still the msot consumed method of TV delivery
He is only netting around 3m viewers, though.
Its not about race you CIAniggger motherfricker, this colectivism is complete bullshit, they care about government control, they even use antifa, black lives matter, proud boys, storm front, whatever
Influential people have power over non democratic and non capitalistic tools to advance their agendas and they will do it.
You should be asking yourself who controls the CIA.
Because they care more about their own power than identity politics
Like how Putin said “you look at us and think because we have the same skin that we think the same. But we don’t”
>white people
depends on your definition