>AI rendered actors look better than humans
>ChatGPT written scripts are better than Hollywood's
Why aren't there stable diffusion/ChatGPT TV shows yet?
The future of entertainment
>AI rendered actors look better than humans
>ChatGPT written scripts are better than Hollywood's
Why aren't there stable diffusion/ChatGPT TV shows yet?
Please be right.
Based anon with based taste.
>22 here
>17 here
Jodie is my all time hottest lesbian. Full stop.
>15
>13
I wish.
Why would you pose for pictures like this and not expect pedos to try and assassinate presidents?
>mkultra
At least I know why she’s a lesbian now.
i think current tech only allow for images not videos
there are videos but they're well behind the pics
this is unironically more entertaining than most network television programming
Great Land of Confusion update.
This stuff is so much more fun and entertaining when it's new and full of bugs and error. Look at the AI images now- it's just boring because it's so good.
this guy gets it
Is that the aT&T girl? lmao
When it's done right it's very good
Nah, its got that ugly waxy look that all digital art has. Also, its just a normal ass picture, whats the fucking point when I can just look at a photograph that looks better?
At least the psychos at deviantart do something different
in a normal photograph they aren't doing all the possible kama sutra acts, and on deviantart they lack photorealism
>in a normal photograph they aren't doing all the possible kama sutra acts
Neither is ai apparently
>and on deviantart they lack photorealism
So does ai
It already looks better than the filters they use on every Wes Anderson movie
>Neither is ai apparently
Tens of thousands of coomers currently fapping to deepfakes of Emma Watson disagree
Looking better than a pile of shit is not the accomplishment you think it is
The ai porn sucks too, but not as bad as the regular shit you indians try to pass off as being the future of cinema
hah I didn't realize contrarians could find a way to be against this yet here you are
>no argument
😉
We're not arguing. You're sperging out over the inevitable future of entertainment for some reason. I was just curious why.
>inevitable future
Kek, just two more weeks, right pajeet?
Still waiting on those hendricks pics btw
It's really more a matter of economics. Why would they continue to pay actors 20 million dollars per picture and script writers hundreds of thousands in residuals when they could pay an AI farm 1/10th of that money.
Yeah I get that but the issue is the technology isn't there and there's no guarantee that it'll ever be able to get to that level, yet Indians seem to be pushing this like they were pushing nft's like some digital snake oil. And assuming it DOES get to that level in 10 years or so, there's no guarantee that it'll be efficient. People are already having problems with the program on their PCs, how expensive and powerful will the PCs need to be to make an entire movie? And what if audiences don't fall for it and these hypothetical films are just massive flops even when compared to the garbage hollywood is putting out now?
Having these conversations is fine, but when (You) streetshitters post your constant garbage images bragging about things yet to come it gets a little obnoxious
I made her 10% desi for you
>Neither is ai apparently
There are image AIs just for porn. There's also different filters for more natural looks.
why does she have furry tits
>Why aren't there stable diffusion/ChatGPT TV shows yet?
make it move and you'll see
Her shoulders look misaligned and she looks airbrushed as fuck. GPT can't write for shit, given how tepid and mediocre the "scripts" it shits out are.
Anon if I can make this kind of quality on my shitty home PC then what could Pixar do
>man
What could Pixar do?
>Hire a bunch of no-talent nepotism and diversity checkboxes
>create soulless cash grabs, reboots, and tepid agenda-pushing propaganda
>shame, outrage market, and emotionally blackmail the general public into consuming their abysmal offerings
Repeat until bankruptcy.
>look better
Kek looks like a dude
Make a better one and post it
Youre the AImoron, get to it rajesh
While you're at it, make me a teen Christina Hendricks but with the same chest size as now
chop chop, curryslurper
Why don't you make what you want to see, phoneposter? You could have teen Christina Hendricks spitroasted 47 ways to sunday if you wanted.
Because, again, youre the indian claiming all this tech is magic
>Christina Hendricks spitroasted
Good call, make one of them black and the other one Chinese. And do hurry, I dont have all day and my small penis is getting flaccid
I'm guessing you've never seen the real Morgan Webb.
I have and she has feminine features even with a strong jaw.
She looks like Henry Cavil with fake tits.
Soon they are just going to deepfake actors faces on the stuntmen who do all the work anyway. They pretty much have been doing that
>They pretty much have been doing that
this is definitely Johnny Depp in Public Enemies (2009)
> 1997
What causes people to vastly overestimate the capabilities of AI?
They said this same kind of stuff when people said cars were going to go over 30 mph
Its Indians not understanding how ai works thinking they can get their own personalized capeshit with the click of a button
films are soulless enough now as it is
written scripts are better than Hollywood's
Show me one.
I wish I knew where one was. I'm asking where they are.
Lol no, you're not getting a free script you unemployed fuck
Doesn't have to write. There's enough variation in the images to guide one into a script like a storyboard.
You cant be serious you fucking pajeet
lmao
not him but he's right. People are already making anime with it. Realistic looking actors and scenes aren't far away in the future.
https://civitai.com/models/7371/rev-animated
>two more weeks!
ITT Writers Guild of America West representatives
Honestly don’t know how much I hate the idea of this being a new art form with artists, people “generating” amazing remarkable shit and getting buzz off of it. Everything is already so lame and manipulative anyway, who gives a shit.
I understand that kind of existential feeling like,
>I would be mad if I had something to lose
at very least the ensuing porn revolution will be both glorious and detrimental
She's a good subject for trainable models because there were so many perverts taking screencaps of her in the 00s which are still on the internet.
There are already models that imitate trailers and advertisements they're being trained on
>video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1651604478196424704/pu/vid/1280x720/5rdESfxa95kJwyWL.mp4
>AI Morgan Webb
This is wrong,she's for 2000s low res cameras only