The invention and mass proliferation of digital cameras killed cinema.
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
The invention and mass proliferation of digital cameras killed cinema.
The invention and mass proliferation of digital cameras killed cinema.
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
The invention of my ass fricked your mom LOL
boom roasted
so you were pegged?
Now this is the kind of highly intellectual discourse I come to Cinemaphile for.
No, it's creative direction.
The proliferation of forums where degenerate morons could post is what killed cinema, you killed cinema.
Frick you you fricking piece of shit, time moves so homosexual. You cannot hold onto ageing actor like they will never die.
>The invention and mass proliferation of graphite pencils killed fine art.
art is surely dead nowadays, so yes.
Kino is there and hard to find due to the flood of shit
People like you unironically deserve to be culled
>top
>ophtalmology ad
>bottom
>knho
I feel like color grading and abuse of cgi hurt film more than digital film.
CGI and color grading are neither as offensive in digital format. Why do you think CGI has started to look so shit? It's because it's now on digital where the shortcomings of CGI are extremely apparent. This is why Hobbit looks like a video game compared to LOTR.
Go rewatch Fellowship and look at the troll/water monster and come back here and tell me the CGI of Smaug looks worse. Fricking kindergarden.
yes it does
Yeah because it still retains the filmic image which makes it easier to process digital creatures.
The problem with film, and many other things such as sports, is that over the years every little thing becomes specialized. The picture, the audio, the production design become so advanced that it removes it from the realm of expected experience for the audience.
With baseball, if you watch ancient World Series games you'll notice that most things such as pitching are "rushed". But now there's 18 different scouting calculations for each pitch from a particular pitcher against a particular batter.
I lived too late to explore the New World and too early to explore the Solar System, but I lived in just the right time to witness the overclocking of the processor of mankind.
Why do non brown eyes look so soulless?
Get with the times man. Blade Runner 2049 looked phenomenal in the theater. You can take any screenshot from a laptop sized resolution and make buffoonish claims, but they dont change the fact that Roger Deakin is literally revolutionizing modern cinematography with real lighting, real shots and all on digital.
You got filtered by your own torrent rip.
>revolutionizing
>with real lighting, real shots
With things people have been doing for over 120 years? LMAO
If you think it's because there's something unique about the results the medium is capable of producing you're dead wrong. And if you think the accessibility of tools is the problem I don't know what to tell you - do you also think we should still all be illiterate save for a privileged few?
>cherrypicked special made video with artifacts out of the ass for the digital version
It's funny even in your cherrypicked video, you can spot how worse it looks in motion compared to film.
And film camera has always meant more job at the actual shooting phase which is what has created the filmic image. That is lost with digital.
The pics are in the WRONG order. The newer one goes BELOW. Never EVER post two pics in the wrong order again. Got it?