The most impressive thing about this movie is it's clear that David Lynch just threw a bunch of random shit against the wall and it came out as a masterpiece just through sheer luck
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
I still don't get it
Filtered af holy shit what happened to Cinemaphile?
>narrating the creation process of Mulholland Drive courtesy of David Lynch himself is being filtered
Don't fricking @ me pleb
It's the usual nonsensical narrative with some hot lezzers thrown in
It's all about Harvey Weinstein.
K.
It’s about Pizzagate and Hollywood trafficking
So is Inland Empire
Lynch has been trying to warn us for years about it
All women are schizos, that's the movie
>threw a bunch of random shit against the wall and it came out as a masterpiece just through sheer luck
You know, it's funny, because that's exactly what happened. No one talks about it, it's a naked emperor situation, but Lynch himself corroborated it through interviews (implicitly). Mulholland drive was intended to be a Twin Peaks spinoff, and it was a pilot for the spinoff. So it was an entirely different thing. When the spinoff got shutdown and the thing got shutdown, he decided to ice this pilot with like an extra ~15 minutes segment and call it a movie, when it was originally intended to be completely something else. It's literally shit thrown together and improvised. It has no coherent creative vision.
It was originally intended to be something else, yes, but the finished film is a product of a cohesive vision. He built off of the footage he already had and it turned out great, it's a complete film
Not everything has to be planned out in advance
>but the finished film is a product of a cohesive vision
it isn't. people have been "deciphering" a "riddle" for 23 years, that is actually just two things randomly stitched together. There's no riddle, message, or coherent vision. It's 90 minutes of shit that was supposed to be explained in Mulholland Dr.: the Show, and 30 minutes of "it was all a dream lmao".
>There's no riddle, message, or coherent vision.
Yes there is, and the movie is pretty straightforward and provides an answer by the end. Lynch even wrote all the clues down for the European DVD edition notes. Are you trolling or genuinely moronic?
What is the black dude behind the restaurant supposed to be?
Camilla's burned, decayed and reanimated corpse. The Winky's Diner scene is Diane's dream about everything that happens, it's a microcosm of the movie's entire plot.
>Camilla's burned, decayed and reanimated corpse
and what gave you that wonderful conclusion?
1. It's specifically played by a woman. 2. It lives behind the place where Camilla's murder was planned and paid for 3. The hobo is seen by Dan (the disturbed man from the diner) after the diner scene, which directly mirrors the scene where Diane arranges Camilla's murder. 4. The Winkie's scene with the hobo and Dan takes place immediately after Rita is shown falling asleep.
And assuming if your 'theory' holds any water, what is the black bag with the box that "Camilla" drops out?
?????
The blue box is Diane's dream ending, after which she wakes up and remembers orchestrating Camilla's murder, it's the most obvious visual cue in the movie, you don't even need Lynch's input to get that one.
Jesus israeli Christ.
Ok then why hasn't anyone figured out the movie after 20 years still
see
homie are you moronic, everyone has figured it out 20 years ago already, because Lynch literally wrote down all the visual cues and clues for it for a European home video release. You can literally just Google/YouTube it. Are you baiting or are you this much of a moron?
It's ok if you just don't get it bro, nobody's going to force you to watch any more David Lynch movies.
I don't get it. Tell me who's the black guy behind the restaurant. Fricking enlighten me.
I think he’s like a physical representation of the darker more destructive parts of Hollywood. At the end of the movie we saw him holding the bag that released the elderly couple from the beginning and who Diane saw torment her at the end before she killed herself. He also has this creeping presence over most of the movie that I kinda relate to the way they portray the darker more creepy side of Hollywood.
I could just be ducking moronic though
Lynch gets away with winging things because he's been making the same movie again and again for 50 years, so anything he produces will be another facet of the prism that is Ronnie Rocket
he doesn't need to plan it because he always draws from the same vocabulary and tries to write the same sentence.
cope
It's literally a mix of Sunset Boulevard and Three Women, just because you don't know any movie from before the year 2000 doesn't mean Lynch doesn't
Also some Persona
if you think its random shit how come you think its a masterpiece? sounds like you don't get it
Could have used a few more lesbian sex scenes. Or more nude scenes with the lady with the big boobs.
Nigg that's lynch's whole thing
It's called catching the big fish
And the least impressive thing is that he's an overrated hack.
i thought it was kinda boring fellas
it's depressing how people so fricking stupid like OP are walking the world
imagine thinking that what goes into the multimillion dollar production of a movie is “random”
Do you even know who David Lynch is
do you? you could write more than a few books on the symbolism and layers in his movies
>So stupid his argument against someone saying Lynch is random is pretending the person was praising his symbolism
Dude, leave the fricking thread, you lost before you started posting
>is pretending the person was praising his symbolism
I think you may be illiterate
You're the dumbest homosexual whose ever used this board
If you think Lynch thinks this shit out and the people who like his stuff think he did, I've got a charity you can donate all your money to Ukraine via with my Venmo address on it
you are uninitiated swine
>i don't get it / i don't like it, so it doesnt make sense
Eraserhead mogs mulholland drive in every aspect. Mulholland drive is lynchs worst work by far
>masterpiece
boring flick, kino bush tho
David Lynch movies might appear like random nonsense to the ignorant pleb mind, but it is not.
Well now, here's a man who wants to get right down to it.
>now kiss
No, that's Inland Empire.
lynch is one of the biggest hacks and the same people who fall for modern art scam praise his blatant ineptitude. " he meant to overexpose it, it was his vision!"
many of hit shots are direct plagiarisms that go beyond mere homage, as he does it for entire sequences, and they are often the most praised parts of his films.
that was his first film, he hasn't copied anything else on that level
Copy what? A head on a pillow?
can't tell if you're pretending to be peabrained mouthbreathing morons who don't watch films, but those shots follow eachother directly within the first scene and he holds almost the exact same number of beats
A blatant lie, you moron.
I can't believe Lynch wasn't the first to film a radiator.
Or laying down, what a complete hack. I’m glad anon is showing us the light.
get fricked, cum gobbling morons, eat his dick some more, the RLM discord is laughing @ u
fricking owned
>mystery movie has non-linear storytelling, requires an IQ of 105> to comprehend
>Local morons absolutely baffled, more news at 11
L Y N C H E D
Yeah nah.
What is with you fricking morons and overcomplicating trash.
I enjoyed the frick out of the movie but don't go there. That's on par with fricking naked performance art.
>Oh you just don't get it
Yeah we fricking do.
>Yeah we fricking do.
No you don't, you're a literal brainlet trying to play it off like it's cool. There's a singular explanation to what happens in Mulholland Dr, which was given by Lynch himself shortly after its release.
Sure thing bro.
You and him are both delusional.
Color me shocked and chagrined.
>maybe if I keep trying to pretend to be obtuse on purpose this will somehow be less embarassing
It won't, you're a brainlet that is confused by very simple visual cues and telegraphed perspective shifts. Mulholland Dr. isn't a collection of random images, and the mystery behind its plot is pretty straightforward - Lynch explained how to read it after he was asked about it after the film's release. You don't get it because you simply lack necessary cognitive faculties, not because everyone else is "pretending" to be able to read it. This movie is sort of an IQ test for you, and you were filtered by it in the most literal sense.
I respect your opinion.
The movie did confuse me.
I still enjoyed it.
Was a bit of a mind-frick.
Okay big-brains??
>”Hey, pretty girl, time to wake up”
I think that’s just how Lynch makes most his movies. It’s just a bunch of stream of conciseness, all vaguely connected to some central theme or idea that he’s trying to convey.
He’s kind of a crazy person, it’s what makes his movies interesting.
More like subconsciousness, but yeah, he plays a lot with what he FEELS he wants to show
"The only things I remember about Mulholland Drive are that Robert Forster seemed like he was going to be an important character, and then we never see him again, and that Naomi Watts seemed much more believable when she was acting (in her audition) than when she was being herself."
- Monte Hellman (RIP)
>makes a TV pilot showing a sugar-coated hollywood fantasy
>pilot canceled
>adapts it into a film by making it an actual delusional fantasy of his protagonist, a bizarre reflection of her real life
wow lmfao literally SO randumb, all bullshit thrown together without a care in the world. how did he get away with this? david lynch is basically a joke writer for FAMILY GUY
What matters to me is the end product. I does not matter to me if Lynch "threw a bunch of random shit against the wall" if I found what resulted of it enjoyable.
The interesting part about his films (that I've watched) is that you can connect the dots however you see fit, no matter if what you came up with isn't what Lynch intended.
Or you can be entertained in a "wow, strange thing happened, cool, creepy" way and be done with it.
Whatever happened to having fun?
This is one of his most straightforward movies, moron.
It isn't, "moron".
Why does lynch like shaving people's eyebrows off?
>CAN YOU DO THAT FOR ME?
Fricking amazing scene.
it makes people look uncanny and Lynch is obsessed with everything uncanny
Hot. That is all.
This is my favorite movie and I’m sick of talking about it. Hide thread.
It’s so fricking good bros
The gritty, realist version of Mulholland drive
>Cassavetes
loading it up now, thanks
Lynch was always a fanfic director. Looks like he took notes of scenes he liked of better movies and copypasted them into his own but in mixed order.
>random
It’s really obvious if you watch it again
This movie is some basic b***h 'it was all a dream' type narrative and by far the most accessibly Lynch movie, how are you all getting filtered? I want 2013 Cinemaphile back
They're either underage or actual 40+ election tourist boomers
It was mostly a dream. Did you even watch it?
It’s not “luck” It’s talent and genius
I've watched it twice and what I got was Dianne was Rita and Becky, but mostly acting through Rita. Becky was her ideal self. All Rita and Becky scenes are distorted truths, everything else more or less happens. Cowboy I think is a manifestation of the man behind Winkey's. Club Silencio is Dianne's unconscious. The man behind Winkey's is a demon hobo or something orchestrating it all. The old couple I think are hallucinations from Dianne but maybe she did meet them at the airport.