Back around 2006-2008 YouTube was awash with athiest content, a lot of it particularly targeted specifically at Christian creationism. Guys like Thunderf00t, TheAmazingAthiest, DPRJones and Richard Coughlan all made this their bread and butter, basically react content but they were taking apart creationists and their arguments.
This goes on for a while and Thunderf00t, who was arguably the most professional when it came to how he posed his arguments on YT, got challenged to a debate from the guy with the banana in the OP.
When the debate happened, Thunderf00t lost. It wasn't that his arguments were poor but he just came across as incredibly uncomfortable doing a face to face debate. Whereas the creationist banana man was doing live shows to crowds all the time in Churches and TV and on the road, so he came across as really laid back and confident.
That's your bit of Athiest YouTube lore for today.
>When the debate happened, Thunderf00t lost. It wasn't that his arguments were poor but he just came across as incredibly uncomfortable doing a face to face debate.
That's not losing.
>debates aren't competition of ideas, they're competitions of personalities. what matters is what effect you have on the audience
That's the most low IQ shit I've ever read on this broccoli rating cardboard, and that's a lot of mileage.
The foil seal was already partially removed prior to filming so they could check to make absolutely certain that life had not formed, thus spoiling their harebrained theory.
Why are theists, Christians in particular, so fricking moronic? I have never seen an ontological “proof” that wasn’t moronic or didn’t conclude to god’s existence. I can understand being religious through faith but people who say its self evident make themselves look absolutely moronic
>people who say its self evident make themselves look absolutely moronic
The obverse is true as well. To take either side is proof positive you are a double Black person
Look up the golem spell goy, you are made of israeli magic from your israeli god. I mean, if you are going to believe in bullshit, why not at least pick the white people's religion?
2 years ago
Anonymous
I don't need to "look up" anything I already know. I'm also an atheist. Kys Cinemaphiletrionic /misc/ACK.
The Banana proves God exists, because the fact that it exists -- or that anything else at all exists -- is evidence of a Prime Mover, who brought all existence into being.
I believe in God. But I do not believe God created the world and humanity in the way Creationists believe. He started the Big Bang to create light. He set up evolution to create Man.
Why pick the seeds at all? I like that the mix up the texture a little bit, I eat them all. They're not harmful. You don't have to worry about a watermelon growing inside of you and having to shit it out. Just eat them. They're great.
>Did people create all fruits or just this one?
All of them. Most have wild versions, but the type you buy and eat simply don't exist in nature, it's all man made.
The Banana proves God exists, because the fact that it exists -- or that anything else at all exists -- is evidence of a Prime Mover, who brought all existence into being.
*tips fedora*
Why did you have to remind me of this homosexuals existence
It was hilarious when he BTFO Thunderf00t in that debate.
>Thunderf00t
Is he trans now? I heard he bent the knee
He made an embarrassing Ukraine post but that's about it, as far as I know
explain please.
Back around 2006-2008 YouTube was awash with athiest content, a lot of it particularly targeted specifically at Christian creationism. Guys like Thunderf00t, TheAmazingAthiest, DPRJones and Richard Coughlan all made this their bread and butter, basically react content but they were taking apart creationists and their arguments.
This goes on for a while and Thunderf00t, who was arguably the most professional when it came to how he posed his arguments on YT, got challenged to a debate from the guy with the banana in the OP.
When the debate happened, Thunderf00t lost. It wasn't that his arguments were poor but he just came across as incredibly uncomfortable doing a face to face debate. Whereas the creationist banana man was doing live shows to crowds all the time in Churches and TV and on the road, so he came across as really laid back and confident.
That's your bit of Athiest YouTube lore for today.
thank you, anon.
>When the debate happened, Thunderf00t lost. It wasn't that his arguments were poor but he just came across as incredibly uncomfortable doing a face to face debate.
That's not losing.
debates aren't competition of ideas, they're competitions of personalities. what matters is what effect you have on the audience
>debates aren't competition of ideas, they're competitions of personalities. what matters is what effect you have on the audience
That's the most low IQ shit I've ever read on this broccoli rating cardboard, and that's a lot of mileage.
Oh the classic hen and egg paradigm. It's always brought up as some kind of clever move by people who don't understand evolution.
remember the peanut butter one
It’s a fair point though.
The foil seal was already partially removed prior to filming so they could check to make absolutely certain that life had not formed, thus spoiling their harebrained theory.
More like the Amazing Atheist's worst nightmare.
Kek
i don't get the joke. is it a reference to a tv commercial?
AA has images of him shoving a banana up his ass.
Brutal
>*shoves it up his ass*
>explain please.
>wojack
>1659
go back
Why are theists, Christians in particular, so fricking moronic? I have never seen an ontological “proof” that wasn’t moronic or didn’t conclude to god’s existence. I can understand being religious through faith but people who say its self evident make themselves look absolutely moronic
>people who say its self evident make themselves look absolutely moronic
The obverse is true as well. To take either side is proof positive you are a double Black person
Reading the quinque viae and still uttering the gibberish you just wrote is a proof of a lack of intelligence.
The OG banana man
>quinque viae
No idea what this shit is but I'm take a wild guess at it being more "magic is real because it just is" moronic bullshit.
>magic
Christcucks seethe so hard when you say this but ignore the fact Adam's creation was a literal israeli magic spell.
Yeah people usually "seethe" (call you out) when you say something wrong and stupid. I bet people "seethe" at you every time you speak.
Look up the golem spell goy, you are made of israeli magic from your israeli god. I mean, if you are going to believe in bullshit, why not at least pick the white people's religion?
I don't need to "look up" anything I already know. I'm also an atheist. Kys Cinemaphiletrionic /misc/ACK.
Its especially funny when they get upset about calling their god "sky daddy" when they say themselves "the/our Heavenly Father".
>noooo you can't call my stupid imaginary bullshit what it is
Yes, I will. If you believe in magic you're as stupid as a child or worse a woman.
Most modern fruits are man-made, yes.
The real question is: is there any natural common produce?
>not self evident
Explain without using words like moronic, if you can.
Case in point this moronic argument
Low quality banana
I've never seen a dog produce a non dog
>>1659
>go back
Comfort's arguments for YEC aren't that great, but his exegesis of Deuteronomic Law is second to none
newbie getting toasty I see
So what about the 100 other fruits?
Study RNA world hypothesis for 6 years and publish 20 peer-reviewed papers and then we'll talk, theistshitters
Why do that when I can just assert my magic imaginary friend did it with a magic spell.
checkmate christcucks
>YOU WEAR A FRICKING HAT. I WON THE ARGUMENT
I believe in God. But I do not believe God created the world and humanity in the way Creationists believe. He started the Big Bang to create light. He set up evolution to create Man.
>God made bananas perfect for human consumption
No, people did that by selecting the traits of successive generations of fruit to minimize the seed size.
>It perfectly fits in your hand and your mouth
So does a dick
>No, people did that
Did people create all fruits or just this one?
You ever seen a painting of an old watermelon? Humans trait selected them for more edible flesh and less inner rind.
i wish they had less seeds. i love watermelons but picking the seeds is a massive hassle.
Monsanto and others make seedless. Probably good for you.
Why pick the seeds at all? I like that the mix up the texture a little bit, I eat them all. They're not harmful. You don't have to worry about a watermelon growing inside of you and having to shit it out. Just eat them. They're great.
But the rind is the best!
>Did people create all fruits or just this one?
All of them. Most have wild versions, but the type you buy and eat simply don't exist in nature, it's all man made.
How oeould a nggfer an bana know?
dont waste your time anon, theyre trolling
The Banana proves God exists, because the fact that it exists -- or that anything else at all exists -- is evidence of a Prime Mover, who brought all existence into being.
reminder that atheists are honorary homosexuals
and catholics are pedophiles
It's weird being an atheist who hates leftism.
>shoves if up his ass
Idk what to make of the atheist response tbh
perfectly designed to accommodate banana
>shoves if up his ass
Idk what to make of the atheist response tbh
Tide goes in, tide goes out. YOU can't explain that.
What if I believe in God but don't believe in the moronic shit Christians spit out?
Nobody here is a christian. Touch grass, tradlarpers.