This documentary is premiering in less than 2 hours, are you excited?
This documentary is premiering in less than 2 hours, are you excited?
This phonograph "reads" a rock’s rough surface and transforms it into beautiful ambient music pic.twitter.com/PYDzYsWWf8
— Surreal Videos (@SurrealVideos) March 3, 2023
Too intellectually dishonest for me senpai
>Too intellectually dishonest for me senpai
Real talk did this thing kill itself?
She cute.
>directed and starring a literal sóyboy addicted to twitter
No thanks. I’m tired of these plants.
Won't watch it but will go to twitter to watch chuds seethe
Same
So this board literally is filled with twitterfags
>avatar has an erased middle to the lips
Why do anime fans do this? It's ugly.
based johnny bravo coomer
This.
Stop posting this shit all I can think of whenever I see it is this
You swindled me! *wooo!*
Let me tell you something about women: something about women
NE-FAF NE-FAF NE-FAF
NE-FAF NE-FAF NE-FAF
nafaf nafaf nafaf
nafaf nafaf nafaf nafaf
First thing I thought of
What can you say about Carlton? He was Carlton.
Did he not feel PAAAAINNN when he was hurt? Did he not SHIT?
DRINK FIVE HOUR ENERGY
DRINK FIVE HOUR ENERGY
IT’S NOT A DRINK
IT’S MORE LIKE A DRINK
Too swayed by [current thing] to ever consider an unpopular opinion.
>try to become woman
>don't even bother shaving
for what purpose
It's genderfluid chud
>Only response is a vitriolic personal attack
What happened to "facts don't care about your feelings"? By his definition barren "women" aren't women.
It’s literally just facts though.
So barren women, prepubescent girls, and post-menopausal women aren't women. Got it.
All of those women have wombs, just not functional ones, try again incel
>prepubescent girls aren't women
that's 100% correct
What gender are they?
Juvenile females of our species are not women. They are girls.
Oh, so there's more than two genders now? Okay commie chud shitlib
gender is a euphemism and an incorrect term. There are two sexes
>gender is a euphemism and an incorrect term.
The way chuds use it is an incorrect euphemism, but gender is a thing and does have a correct usage. It refers to your form, your genes. Don't let them steal the word and make it meaningless.
Didn't ask you okay.
you can split hairs all you want, you don't even have a womb gay, when men start having wombs and vaginas, then i'll call you a woman, you don't even need the chromosomes
Just get those things and you'll be a real woman
I'm not a woman and, like most normal people, I don't give a fuck about chud shit. It's just funny that you gays can't counter the most basic arguments without ignoring it while screeching "FACTS! JUST SO!" with no logic to back it up. Neither side seems to be able to form a rational thought and it's hilarious.
>you can split hairs all you want
It's not splitting hairs. This is how logic and definitions work. If a woman is defined by having a functioning womb, what gender are all the women who can't reproduce?
do you have a womb and a vagina yet?
Do you have an argument yet?
>What makes a man a man and a woman a woman?!
You're literally asking things that you should have learned in fucking 9th grade sex-ed. Who wants to spoon-feed a complete retard like you?
These chud obsessed weirdos who frequent here thinks everyone is a progressive and share their obsession as well.
>You're literally asking things that you should have learned in fucking 9th grade sex-ed.
And yet you can't seem answer this apparently simple question and instead resort to insults and dishonesty. How curious.
>It's not splitting hairs. This is how logic and definitions work.
It is splitting hairs. Everyone knows what a woman is. If we try and define women by people with a specific set of chromosomes you'll bring in some very fringe case in order to "disprove" said definition. Even these mentally ill people know they're not a woman, which is why they tend to look like a parody of actual women, bending their hands, using excessive makeup and over the top gestures
>It is splitting hairs.
If by splitting hairs you mean going into detail that isn't necessary for most people in their day to day lives, then the hair splitting started when you brought up trans people in the first place. They're a fraction of a percent of the population and you can easily live you entire life without exchanging so much as a word with one.
>Everyone knows what a woman is
You apparently don't since you can give a definition
>If we try and define women by people with a specific set of chromosomes you'll bring in some very fringe case in order to "disprove" said definition
Yes, because those examples raise legitimate questions about your definition. This is literally a basic deductive logic problem. If you say "all apples are red," and I show you a green apple, then there are only two possibilities to resolve the contradiction; either your statement is false or the green apple is not an apple, in which case, what is it?
>These people know they're not women because I feel like they're not women stop questioning my worldview
That's all these arguments boil down to.
>They're a fraction of a percent of the population and you can easily live you entire life without exchanging so much as a word with one.
Then what the fuck gives them the right to try and dictate how the entire world acts? Fuck you. They absolutely do affect my life because they insist on it.
>a fraction of a percent of the population
>dictating how the entire world acts
All apples are apple. Regardless of their color. Pears are not apples. An apple being rotten does not make it a pear. A pear mutilating itself to take the shape of an apple does not become an apple.
Does your subhuman amerigoblin brain understand now?
So you don't understand basic logic, got it. I'd say take a class in it, but you should have gotten all you need from the basics of set theory taught in most high school math curriculums, so graduate high school, kiddo
>no argument
I accept your defeat, gay
>They're a fraction of a percent of the population and you can easily live you entire life without exchanging so much as a word with one.
plenty of media has been censored to avoid hurting them, plenty of media show them as people to look up to when most of them are degenerates. I've met 2 of them in my life and both of them would bring up their fetishes whenever they could
>You apparently don't since you can give a definition
I can give it to you. The problem is that you want an airtight one which is impossible. I could ask you about the definition of a random species and some smartass could use mutations as examples for why your definition is wrong. In this case you're being that smartass. I could tell you that eagles have a pair of wings and you'd find an eagle that lost them and claim it as proof that my definition is wrong
women are adult biological females. you can argue for intersex/androgen insensitivity but you are arguing using execptions that demonstrate the norm (having xx sex chromosomes will cause you to be pheontypically female)
No one argues that is not the norm. The debate is whether that is the totality
Again, you can spend your entire life never interacting with trannies. I've met two trannies in my entire life and exchanged maybe a totally of 10 words with both of them. They have absolutely no power over you whatsoever. You have created a persecution complex to justify your disgust at these people existing.
>>The debate is whether that is the totality
No.
The debate is whether or not a genotype/phenotype woman can be considered a man (or vice versa) by using the term gender as a weasel word.
The answer of course is no.
>The debate is whether or not a genotype/phenotype woman can be considered a man (or vice versa) by using the term gender as a weasel word.
Wrong. The "gender is a social construct" people are the non-binaries, which is a different thing. The trans thesis is that sex/gender can be changed through HRT and surgery. Get your boogymen straight.
Then why do people lose their jobs for not playing along with the sick delusional fantasies of these perverted freaks?
Fucking leftist rat.
They lost their jobs because republicans have fought for decades to protect at-will employment
>I don't give a fuck about chud shit
>I'm just desperate to defend this bullshit because I'm a retarded leftist and have to parrot the herd
I'm just asking people to answer the title of the film and laughing at the meltdown that ensues.
> It's not splitting hairs. This is how logic and definitions work. If a woman is defined by having a functioning womb, what gender are all the women who can't reproduce?
Univariate fallacy. There is no singe defining feature that separates human brains from chimp brains either, doesn’t mean the categories aren’t real.
https://mobile.twitter.com/swipewright/status/1124406797916409856
>If a woman is defined by having a functioning womb
See, this is exactly the problem.
Matt said "female reproductive organs". This is objectively correct and inarguable, so your brain immediately re-phrases it in a way that you can attack it by pretending he said "FUNCTIONING WOMB". You made the exact same mistake as the person he's arguing against, who immediately slips and calls people with non-functioning female reproductive organs WOMEN, tacitly admitting that THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE FUCKING CALLED.
Then you read the rebuttal at the bottom and think it's a non sequitur because you re-wrote what Matt said in your brain, and use the last caustic line as an excuse to dismiss it all as an ad hominem. A disabled womb is still a female reproductive organ. You can turn your penis into a hole and call it a vagina, but from a biological standpoint it's not a genital any more than any other hole you'd choose to drill in your body.
I've seen tons of people on your side make the exact same mistake. You're so fucking obsessed to deploy this "WHAT ABOUT INFERTILE WOMEN???" slam dunk of an argument that as soon as you think it's time to deploy it you completely lose track of what's being said.
Is there something else you're talking about?
That meme image just says someone trans doesn't have a disabled uterus (ignoring transplants), just that they don't have one, which isn't particularly controversial if you ignore the way it's put across.
Which is deflecting from the core argument without addressing it at all.
I'm confused, are you agreeing with me?
Uh, I guess? You didn't say anything untrue, but my point was about how the bottom text doesn't follow from the top text at all.
Well you could also say it's just a meaningless strawman too given that it lacks context, like all political memes and would-be memes.
humans have 10 fingers; very rarely do some people have more or less. we don't count outliers or put an asterisk next to everything; same here.
Leftist position is that words don't have meaning, objective reality does not exist, truth does not exist, and therefore language can be twisted to suit any definition at any time, based on feelings. Rightist position is that truth does exist and that words do have meaning. These are two fundementslly irreconciable ideals, mainly because leftists don't actually understand their own position. They'll say stuff like "oh 2+2 isn't *always* 4". But what they mean is that the + operator can be changed to any function; the don't mean the *function* has changed. They think the symbol *is* the thing. And this is where leftist position totally falls apart; they want the symbol to mean whatever they want it to mean, but in doing so, they posit that the operator *means* some new function.
It's a dishonest sophistry endemic to post-modern critical theorists:
>words have no meaning (social construct)
>therefore this word can mean anything
>therefore it means what I want it to mean
It's total bullshit. They're just fudging words around because they desperately want the word to mean something else, leftists are obsessed with with ideology, perception and "validity" over everything else. Constantly redefining words to suit their needs.
Now actually moving on to your question "what is a woman", I'm going to say "a person with vagina and ovaries
which developed from a zygote with xx chromosones". Everything else is a mutant. The end.
The moment you bring psychology or gender into this, you're entering the realm of post-modern liberal epistomology which is fruitless, because of the way I described above. There is no "logic" or "facts" in such a framework; You can just arbitrarily decide what is or isn't a social construct.
Ultimately this "debate" wouldn't exist if trannies weren't repulsive. don't need to do mental gymnastics to justify fucking a trap. "It's a cute boy". It's all sophistry to convince people of a delusion so trannies can get their jollies.
>Inane off topic rambling
Meds.
>Now actually moving on to your question "what is a woman", I'm going to say "a person with vagina and ovaries
which developed from a zygote with xx chromosones". Everything else is a mutant. The end.
Thank you for actually having the courage to try to give an answer. Now tell me, what sex are the mutants?
Barren women still have reproductive organs, they just don't work as they should because of birth defects.
Can anyone explain what Matt Walsh's deal is? He seems way more radical than ben shapiro and gang, why does he stay at such a cucked publication
$$$$$
like it's actually a miracle ben hired this guy
https://twitter.com/mattwalshblog/status/943876016103079936?lang=en
Yeah why would Ben Shapiro and his people want to control all sides of the argument?
>radical
He seems sensible. If that's "radical" by today's political standards, then we're fucked.
Because he’s the living sòyboy meme
You're really set on pushing that, aren't you?
>You're really set on pushing that, aren't you?
beardcuck
He actually has a great dry sense of humor and is more effective than Knowles.
Knowles is dry but he's more broadly informed
Do you actualLy watch that boomer shit my man? You need to get radicalized
John Doyle all day
Yes and unironically John Doyle seems like a bit of an autist but man his brand of political conservatism is the most appealing and likely the closest we will get to the old ways without alienating people.
Does he oppose demographic replacement or is he just another civnat?
Western civilization will cease to exist without the people who create it
>Do you actualLy watch that boomer shit my man?
It occasionally comes up.
>You need to get radicalized
I know all about the J-Team but I ain't no Natsee
Controlled opposition, conservacucks have to take reasonably edgy stances or actual white nationalists will gain more ground
hes probably saying shit like this because he is a father and ben shapiro can leave to israel matt isnt gnomish he has to stay in america
>>man makes documentary about what it means to be a dog
>why doesn't a dog make this documentary?
link the trailer
here you go, moron
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=what+is+a+woman+trailer
>daily wire doc
Oh I thought a chud made it kek. Who cares
>I will never be a man
HOLY KINO
SBG for life
What's this documentary about? Will he do some cool investigation into some random chud's life to dig their retconned past and have them detransitioned afterwards?
I guess he goes to bumfuck Africa and asks a bunch of tribals what a woman is and they give him a pretty straight forward answer. Then that's going to be contrasted by him going to a bunch of universities and all the gays with doctorates there stammering and being unable to give him a straight answer.
sounds like kino
XX chromosomes
Where can i watch it without paying for the subscription?
If you're so interested in watching it just pay for the subscription.
The reason most people here don't have Netflix is not because they choose to pirate it, it's because they have no interest in their programming.
>advertistment
>advertis t ment
Cinemaphile users are mainly low income.
Yes.
Yes
Hell no dogs are actually loyal and can be trained well and they understand the consequences of their actions unlike women
I'm not signing up for DailyWire to watch it. Maybe if it goes on Amazon.
Here we go, lads. Wish me luck.
Nevermind. They're doing 1 hour of preshow.
mirror that shit or shut the fuck up paypig
Stream it you moron
This. STREAM IT.
>owning a daily wire subscription
for what purpose
>It's the question you are not allowed to ask
Another couple of decimals added to the odds that society will collapse sooner than later
aWHERE IS THE STREAM LINK
No re-stream for poor fags?
Late stage Cultural Marxism.
It's out
https://watch.dailywire.com/whatisawoman
https://watch.dailywire.com/whatisawoman
https://watch.dailywire.com/whatisawoman
https://watch.dailywire.com/whatisawoman
>have to pay
No
The Daily Wire YouTube channel is showing the preshow. Not sure if they’ll show the film.
They showed Shut-In (the Vincent Gallo movie) on YouTube for one night only.
They said they aren't doing that anymore.
No idea why these fags are so desperate to defend women, they're the ones who pushed this shit to begin with
they pushed chud shit? You mean garden gnomes? well ya
Bioholes were the bludgeon they used to force this shit in the first place. They first put forth the assertion that there was no difference between genders.
Is that Quagmire's dad?
>2 hours to find out that of all the people who pay to watch it, none know how to properly capture a livestream
I wonder how the few actual hermaphrodites out there feel about all the chudism in today's media.
>hermaphrodites
404
there are a few people with fucked up genitals born every now and then
>people with fucked up genitals
That isn't hermaphroditism.
the people calling themselves women don't have that problem, stop splitting hairs
Why would I want to watch two hours of smug chuds btfo'ing random people on the street with ambiguous questions?
>ambiguous questions
10/10 bait
It's not all random people though. It looks like he talks to doctors who have to admit they're giving the same drugs to kids as sex offenders, and a congressman.
it will make some trannies seethe and a greater than zero amount of them commit suicide, so it can only be a good thing. that being said, i couldn't be assed to watch it because what new information can it possibly provide that a literal toddler couldn't intuit about the myriad mental illnesses that constitute these """movements"""?
Look, Matt, I appreciate you putting your livelihood on the line to ask questions that no one wants to talk about, but I live in the third world and 9 dollars is a lot of money, so fuck off, ok?!
This movie is only partly meant for you (people that dont believe men can turn into women), and mostly meant to sway opinions (of people who are NPCs and dont really think about the implications of the answer of the question; ie "what is a woman? uhhhh idk, if they think they're a woman who cares lol)
I’ve never seen a person irl who knows who Matt Walsh is
Every celeb has a start date on fame, or a moment/movie that makes them go viral. You think normies knew who ben shapiro was before he btfo that fatty? Would you bet 99/100 normies knew who jordan peterson was before that anti-nazi POV video at his college?
I’ve never met anyone average who knows who Jordan Peterson is. The only person I know who does is my coworker who posts here and Kiwi Farms
Jordan Peterson is huge, do you ask random people if they know who Jordan Peterson is?
>Jordan Peterson is huge
By what metric? The only people I know who know him is a fellow chronically online person.
I eating dinner with my brother and his GF from Canada and the waiter heard they were from Canada and said he loved Jordan Peterson
I live in america tho. Maybe he’s popular there but certainly not here.
He was on TV in the UK and Australia, and sold out appearances and had a best-selling book. Many people know who he is, but I would say far less would recognise JBP than would recognise Rafael Nadal
Fine, let me change my position
Not every celeb needs to be some a-list ubiquitous household name like brad pitt. Their goal is to maximize their exposure and get as many eyes as they can on the movie(s) they produce. In matt walsh's case, sure being famous would probably be nice, but the real goal is to make people THINK about the chud topic. What is a woman isnt about matt walsh, its about men who call themselves women, and the NPCs who go along with it
>In matt walsh's case, sure being famous would probably be nice, but the real goal is to make people THINK about the chud topic
So why’d he paywall it behind a streaming service that nobody uses instead of uploading it to YouTube with all his other content?
My bro do you think Matt walsh and the videographers and video editors work out of the kindness of their hearts? what the fuck
Are you retarded? Putting it up on the streaming service isn’t pay per view. In fact he can run ads on it on YouTube and still make money.
>he can run ads on it on YouTube and still make money
Yeah, YouTube wouldn't demonetize an anti-trans documentary at all.
You do realize their anti-trans videos still have monetization right?
YouTube is famous for demonetizing anything that doesn't walk lock step with the right message.
And yet The Daily Wire is still monetized and is one of the biggest political channels on youtube, what are you even babbling about?
B-but my favorite pundits told me big tech is discriminating against conservatives and that's why nobody likes my Facebook posts!
>Yeah sure numerous conservative voices get demonitized and outright suspended from their youtube and twitter accounts like steven crowder and babylon bee and milo and fuentes etc etc
>but look, ~~*The Daily Wire*~~ is still monetized! 1/20 monetization means there isnt a bias chuds!
Steven Crowder is monetized on YouTube. Nick Fuentes is not a conservative and he explicitly states this
>Steven Crowder is monetized on YouTube.
Sometimes.
Most of the time. Stop being a baby gay.
Nick fuentes is a paleoconservative
He’s a groomer who literally tells young boys to not have sex or have gfs. He’s not conservative.
grifting gays exist everywhere, doesn't mean his messages or propaganda is wrong tho
You take what you can get i guess, i watched him a couple of times and he seems pretty based, not to radical but enough of a zoomer to get through in the heads of young people and redpill them on more radical conservative ideas
Telling boys to not have relationships is not a good message you dumb gay.
I didn't even know he said that calm down you retard, does he say that?
Or does he say for them to wait to get married and have kids?
Seems like you want it both ways, you're calling him a grifter and not a conservative because he tells kids not to engage in a promiscuous lifestyle but you, but that exactly what a classic conservative would do, wait until marriage and have kids with a decent woman
So which one is it? Is he a grifter? Is he a conservative?
I thought they were friends, what the fuck has Nick been doing, i haven't watched him since he was on that chink livestreaming website
>what the fuck has Nick been doing
lying about his viewership numbers, ranting about how he hates working class people and that he's a better person than them because he's rich, getting outted as a chud porn addict
>So which one is it? Is he a grifter? Is he a conservative
They're the same thing
>grifter
why is are you people so enamored with this word? the medical community is making trillions off of your mental illness but thats not a grift?
It's the new chud word from leftoids to try and stop any right wingers to watch any sort of right wing content, well because they "grifters" never giving any alternative, different type of content creator etc
They just say "grifter" like it means anything, i've seen these gays call grifter to anything, it's lost it's meaning at this point
God forbid a right winger try to make a living off of his completely populist medium, no no, he should work some wagecuck job exclusively to make money, then do his politiking as a pro bono hobby or something
Meanwhile hasan piker the radical socialist is about to buy a mansion and *silence*
More liberals shit on Hasan and his purchase than anybody else. Dude lost like 2k subs that week on twitch and had a lot of breadtubers shit on him repeatedly.
There were also a minimum of 3 hitpieces about him being drunk at the Met Gala and saying sexually suggestive things to a couple models the same week the news broke.
>hurr hurr the left always eats its own
That's the point of being moral. Calling out grifters and predators. I fucking /wish/ the Right would hold their own to the standards they want embodied. It took a fucking cripple from the Carolinas to stand up to the Right and they defamed him out of the tent so they could keep fucking young boys and snorting coke.
LOL
LMAO
You leftists have your heads so chock full of shit that you actually start believing the river of bullshit that spews out of your mouths
kek what a gigaretard
word salad
projecting here rabbi
>In fact he can run ads on it on YouTube and still make money.
Oh, you are clueless.
Quick question dumbass, why do you think every youtube content creator with a modicum of success ends the video with "Like, subscribe, and if you want to see more content, please consider *****subscribing to my patreon*****"
Question 2, do you really, unironically think an anti-chud video on youtube would get monetized and promoted on youtube? holy shit
See
I know im copping out, but I'd bet dollars to donuts they'd explicitly demonitize it just because its pride month
>I know im copping out
You don’t have to argue for the sake of arguing if you realized you’re wrong.
Trump literally incited a riot and got people killed and somehow chuds take away from this there's some great conspiracy to deplatform conservative voices.
we haven’t even started yet gay
oh no, what are you gonna do? drive to a supermarket or elementary school?
Didnt project veritas release a clandestine interview last month with a pajeet twitter engineer who literally says they intentionally skew the bias to the left?
Yes, but it doesn't count because it's PV.
yes its obviously biased. There are endless examples. The gay you are replying to is either a troll or completely brainwashed.
yes it's on tape, gay leftoids just can't admit it
>project veritas
Uh-huh because they haven't been caught red handed just making shit up before right. Anyone remember their "sting" against the Washington Post in defense of Roy Moore? Or what about the deceptive editing in their abortion video with the pimp outfit.
>Uh-huh because they haven't been caught red handed just making shit up before right.
They've literally won every single lawsuit they've filed. Hundreds of them. Tens of millions of dollars. I bet you still think Rittenhouse shot 3 black guys, because that's what the MSM and twitter told you. Literally living in fantasy world.
Right wingers are so obsessed with ideals, honor, loyalty, and honesty that they freak out whenever anyone wants to make a little money off what they do. Anyone right wing who makes any money is a “grifter” who totally secretly doesn’t believe what they say
Considering what happened with Milo, Baked Alaska, and Nick Fuentes the cum Inspector. Yes many people on the right are grifters
That’s an incredibly fair point. I guess it’s wise to be as guarded as we are. Fuck all them gays. Although milo is literally a gay garden gnome so you shouldn’t have trusted him for an iota
Milo is a straight catholic now.
I'm not a chud incel, Matt. I think trans women are women, only not in the actual biological sense, just in a social self identitarian way.
I'm just not a filthy lefty also, so I recognize that transsexualism is a mental illness and that right now there's a ton of other more aggravating mental illnesses being incentivized to be acknowledged as trans. As far as I'm concerned trans people are people who suffer from gender dysphoria and everything else should be gatekept and shamed and the trans community needs to start doing that and stop being pawns of the left, who really only increase transphobia by being insane freaks.
So the best chance you have is to follow that route, that's what's going to sway moderates (and maybe even conservatives). I follow all this shit closely, this position, the liberal (not in the retarded american way of the word) centrist perspective is the one that's going to be the next big thing, trust me.
Still not buying your movie though, that's a week of food.
>I'm not a chud incel, Matt. I think trans women are women, only not in the actual biological sense, just in a social self identitarian way.
>I'm just not a filthy lefty also, so I recognize that transsexualism is a mental illness and that right now there's a ton of other more aggravating mental illnesses being incentivized to be acknowledged as trans. As far as I'm concerned trans people are people who suffer from gender dysphoria and everything else should be gatekept and shamed and the trans community needs to start doing that and stop being pawns of the left, who really only increase transphobia by being insane freaks.
>So the best chance you have is to follow that route, that's what's going to sway moderates (and maybe even conservatives). I follow all this shit closely, this position, the liberal (not in the retarded american way of the word) centrist perspective is the one that's going to be the next big thing, trust me.
>Still not buying your movie though, that's a week of food.
Didn't ask you npc weirdo.
I expect someone to rip it or stream it now.
I've seen a lot of chud seethe about this.
I’m watching it now. This shit is great lmao.
The gender studies professor was hilarious.
Honestly this is the most surreal thing I've ever watched. Like: imagine asking this ten, fifteen years ago.
Not doing a great job of putting that athlete in shadow. Got a good look at her profile.
That Congressman lasted about, what, 3 minutes? kek
Post torrent or you’re a paid shill
STREAM IT PLS, PAYCHADS
>what is a woman
fortunately John and Yoko already answered this for us kek
I will watch this documentary if that song plays
this is a shitty edit
nas
>omg is that a heckin anti-transgender documentarino i cant wait to watch bros! Post the link!
I say that but I look like this
a pedo roider?
bro supports trans rights unironically.
He had sex with one.
>trans rights
What does this mean? The right to rape kids?
The right to jack off in women's bathrooms and changing rooms. The right to be housed with women in rape victim centres.
>https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadas-oldest-rape-crisis-centre-stripped-of-city-funding-for-refusing-to-accept-trans-women
>https://thepostmillennial.com/kill-terfs-vancouvers-women-only-rape-shelter-vandalized-with-death-threats-rat-nailed-to-door/
>there are no passing trannies
How come nobody calls out the female to male ones then?
They don't pass though. You just ignore them, because they are pathetic and pose no danger to anybody. You can quickly shut them up by being rude and mean to them.
>anti-transgender
It's pro-woman. Are you anti-woman, anon?
CHUD says what
Why wouldn’t you be?
You should complete your sentences.
>Are you anti-woman, anon?
who isn't at this point
>that jump from 5'4 to 5'5
5'5bros, feels decent man
even women hate other women
>tranime
>>>/a/
get lost chud
i didnt ask you okay
Can someone stream it post a torrent I can't find a legit link anywhere
>what is a woman
I legitimately am confuse by this.
gemerald
>What is a Woman!?
A miserable little pile of secrets!
Won't watch it but will go to /misc/ to watch chuds seethe about chuds on twitter
not really but it makes retards seethe so ill be collecting screencaps later
enough of your retarded verbage and bullshit i wont read. where to watch this kino?
wait for it to release, it'll probably be on fmovies, comment section will be a goldmine probably
cheers
Please post a link
Can't find shit anywhere, YouTubes filled with moron bots
You probably won’t find it till they release it. It was a live stream, so someone would’ve had to screen record it and I doubt anyone did.
Most based thread in this sub.
>this sub.
Yeah I’m thinking this is shills
/misc/ is my subreddit go cry me a river
Why isn’t chud twitter exploding??????
2 weeks
Unironically
I was looking for twitter screencaps to salt mine for 30minutes. Anyone find anything?
No one cares
>No one cares
>t.
The salt is plentiful from anti-chuds in this thread
They're going to watch clips of it on Youtube and Tiktok, they aren't buying it to watch the whole thing.
not a good look to point fingers at your grift being exposed by facts and logic kek
No one is paying 14 dollars for some shitty youtube doc
Because its on The Daily Wire. Retards should have put it on Amazon or some shit.
They should've just put it on YouTube.
I'm not giving you any shekels, Ben.
torrent when?
>this thread
Now answer the question
What is a woman?
The question has already been answered.
Not the definition of woman
What is a woman?
when they resort to calling you an incel instead of answering the question, you've probably won the argument
Why did they attempt to bring up trannies unprovoked? Is it obsession?
>gay posts twitter reddit tier comeback
Holy shit go back
>Something you'll never be
see i can do it too, go back now
?
Answer my question first
What is a woman?
A chud
Okay cuckchan chud.
Actually, having sex with a man is totally valid, so shaming someone for never having sex with a woman is pretty silly.
Just give us the que and us Muslim bros will eliminate all the alphabet people
Its cue you dirty sandworm
Inshallah, NOW
Where can I watch this?
>What is a woman?
A human adult female.
Got any more easy questions?
>pull two legs off a spider
>now it's no longer a spider
how do leftists unironically make this argument and still manage to think they're being serious?
You dont even have to pull the legs off for some of them
Where do watch bros?
Sorry too busy watching Buck Breaking
based
nas coal dust
what is this and why it's a big deal?
shapiro underling makes trannies seethe
So this trash was on torrent earlier but now is gone everywhere? Did I imagine it?
A sweet an American thread.
leave matt walsh to me
I'm not a retard, I know what a woman is.
Is this about incels?
I've said this in other threads, but I'll say it here too - Trannies don't live in anybody's head rent free. They kick the door to your head down and shit on the carpet. They put themselves everywhere until there is nowhere left to enjoy. I joined a Metroid discord because I was excited about Metroid Dread and wanted to see what people were talking about. There was maybe one person talking about Metroid. Everyone else was congratulating this "egg" that just "came out" as trans in the Metroid Lore discussion channel. I tried to talk about how cool it was that the pirates kept Metroids in Phendrana Drifts because its cold environment prevented them from escaping. I was banned for off topic posting. I tried to watch AGDQ last night. One of the commentators was a man, with a man voice, with a hoe-boive avatar instead of a face, whose pronouns were listed as fae/faer. These fucking people do not leave you, your space, or your thoughts alone. If you try to have a discussion without them, they insist on making it about them. I can't even click a YouTube video anymore without some gay putting on a fake girl voice and trying to act like a cute anime retard. It's painful. It's dishonest and inauthentic. It is also an act of aggression. If you can't recognize that, I don't know what to tell you.
Trannies like invading spaces like the narcissists they are. It's especially notorious in 'weeb', 'geek' hobbies.
No one actually does this outside of social platforms like Cinemaphile get help
>what is discord
Ok, grandpa.
>does this outside of social platforms
okay grandma learn to read
here are times when I'm busy with work/family stuff and have to stay off this place and other social media for a few days, and in that time I always forget trannies even exist since they don't actually engage with regular people in irl stuff and have no presence outside of the internet. But the moment I hop on back online I immediately find some trancel screaming about his rights or some internet celebrity bringing awareness of trans issues or some other bullshit.
>Words words words
Right can't meme.
If you want memes, just be straightforward and ask
>post some memes
This. YWBAW
Lying is aggressive. The entire trans movement is dripping with dishonesty. When you tell me to refer to you as "she/her" you are telling me to see a woman when I look at you. I don't. I see your receding hairline, I see your broad shoulders, I see your thin hips, I see your gut and sinking cheeks and wide stubble, I see your fashion sense that reeks of male sensibilities, I see your taste in anime that reeks of somebody with a porn addiction, I see your imitation based on what men find attractive, but more than this I see male aggression. I see the demand to dominate. I see acts of assertion and imperialist reeducation. You demand that I tell you 2+2=5 and when I refuse you become angry, aggressive, and seek my removal or destruction. You are bullies who want to assert yourselves over others but have no field in which you're competitive except in social manipulation. You demand female spaces, you demand female aesthetics, you even demand the female label. You take even this from the women from which you wish you could take love and acceptance. You have gone beyond incel. You have entered into thievery and barbarism. Pastiche. Fraud. Imitation. Ersatz. You are dishonest, inauthentic, and aggressive. You are not, will never, can never, and should never be a woman. You are the aggressor in every space, turning the conversation towards your hatred of the penis and leg hair, towards your lust for the female. Your insistence on being called a woman is your demand to be given the girlfriend you were denied through your roleplaying as that imaginary woman. You are your father's son, and that is how you will die.
Any documentary that starts off by showing cherrypicked retards in a crowd being questioned is pretty low hanging fruit, to be frank.
WHERE'S THE FUCKING moron LINK?! GOVE ME THE moron LINK! GUVE ME THE moron LINK! GIVE ME THE moron LINK!
i dont read the DailyMan, but this looks unironically kino
LINK!!!
Transgender ideology is built on self hatred and the religious worship of shallow, sexist stereotypes. It teaches people that they were born wrong if they're a girl who likes kickball or a boy who likes having long hair and cooking. There's no reason a man can't fulfill the same roles and adopt the same traditions as a woman, and vice versa. There's no reason to "change" your "gender" in the first place because "genders" ought to be equally able to pursue their passions. The concept of gender identity is inherently sexist and limiting. It's built on bigotry. The man who came up with "gender identity" is a murderer who caused two boys to kill themselves. In reality all we have is biological sex. Your sex doesn't determine your hobbies, your roles, your fashion or your personality. You choose those things. As an individual. Isn't that a better, more free world? One where sex is all that exists and people are free to pursue whatever they want regardless of their sex? "Gender" is a needless restriction and it does not serve as a genuine identity. The logical progression of breaking down the differences leads to tomboys and femboys. It leads to people who don't let their biological sex influence their hobbies or fashion. The transgender cult is all about building up those limitations and enforcing them so strictly that any little boy who so much as glances at a Barbie doll gets put on hormone blockers so that he can be railroaded into becoming "a girl" because "only girls like dolls". We used to have a culture that said "if you're a boy you ought to like sports" and now we have a culture that says "if you like sports you ought to become a boy". We skipped right over the healthy, rational middleground that says there's no reason a girl can't play kickball with her friends without mutilating herself and taking testosterone.
Go to back to 4chan you retards, this board isn’t for political shit
This thread is about political television shows.
Dilate your mind chud, until you do 4chan is where you belong.
Btw I'm trans.
Sorry, chud, but this is a film, which we are discussing on a television and film board.
Yall need prescriptions.
A smooth janny dab
HEY MATT WALSH I KNOW YOU'RE READING THIS! YOU'RE A FUCKING DUMB DOGCUNT gay BITCH!
Not in netflix canada, tf
Trolls trolling trolls in an ocean of piss.