This is a masterpiece and Im tired of people acting like it isnt

This is a masterpiece and I’m tired of people acting like it isn’t

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Not a masterpiece like LotRs but it is quality kino that deserves more respect than it got.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's everything wrong with Peter Jackson given free reign since he was fresh off LOTR.
    >flat acting with terrible actor decisions
    >overreliance on CGI to create insane scenarios
    >inability to cut out plot irrelevant scenes and padding
    >utterly bombastic and over the top compared to the original work

    I still like it, but everything wrong eith the Hobbit is present here.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Wrong!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i agree, you can see jackson leaning into all his hackier tendencies, but it's STILL got a bunch of legitimately great scenes

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It’s so hacky and terribly shot. https://youtu.be/Mo0TilV02As

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Can almost taste the CGI.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Agree.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The tie-in game was a masterpiece if anything else.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/YBjGrCg.jpg

      This is a masterpiece and I’m tired of people acting like it isn’t

      men of taste and culture

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Played all the time on my PSP

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The shit with the centipedes in the walls still sticks with me after so long.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It was legitimately the most boring game I have ever played. I stated seeing praise for it on the internet about 10 years ago and I’ve never failed to be baffled about why people seem to like it so much.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Always gotta one homosexual

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I too love this version of King Kong the most. And goddamn, when they fall into that valley with all the creepy crawlies, that shit was traumatizing

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >And goddamn, when they fall into that valley with all the creepy crawlies, that shit was traumatizing
      The shit that had me was Kong ripping the TRex jaws apart. THAT was some shit.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i loved this scene as well, probably my favorite part in the movie. the lack of music and just the noise of them struggling against the insect beasts was so unsettling and beautiful, the submachine gun SFX was excellent, the brutal deaths. definitely the most memorable scene in the movie

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Traumatized for life. Everytime I see the thing coming out like a dick makes me wanna puke

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Better monster movie than the dogshit we’ve been getting for the past 10 years.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Monkeys aren't monsters you RACIST, you RACIST calling black people monkeymonsters you're RACIST

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No, it was made in the dark ages of the genre. Or should I say a near total drought. We're in a much better place now.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Frick no, nowadays monster movies are trash compared to back then.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        > it was made in the dark ages of the genre
        The Mist
        The Host
        Cloverfield
        Avatar
        Slither
        The Cave
        Dog Soldiers
        The Mummy
        Pan’s Labyrinth
        The Decent
        Silent Hill

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Of monster movies. The 00s weren't too kind to it, the movies we got weren't very successful and Jackson's King Kong was the exception although today it's not very popular. It's underappreciated. Today the genre is at last in great shape again.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The Host was very popular for a hot minute but now it disappear from the discussion. It's like the period between 2004-2013 has been memory holed.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Monster movies nowadays are woke as frick, look at Prey. We are in post-glory days of monster movies.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I wasn't even thinking about that because I had giant sized in mind. For some reason that one is sometimes considered its own separate genre because of the number of films and their variety. But if we include non-giant monster movies that still makes sense. The 00s were awful for them, Alien and Predator were degraded into something like generic teen horror.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Holy shit you’re a moron.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                > For some reason that one is sometimes considered its own separate genre because of the number of films and their variety.
                By who? First time I ever heard about this.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I think we are currently in the dark ages of the genre. Everything has to be a cinematic universe not a standalone story like back then.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Avatar was the top movie of all time back in the 00s and it was a glorified high budget monster movie epic. Much of the creature design from Avatar is still being influenced today. Avatar popularized the bioluminescent creature trope that’s been done to death by now. You who no idea what you’re talking about.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              What's Avatar?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Watching this opening night. Just for the monsters.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              > Avatar popularised.
              Oh no James Cameron made another alien film with bad boy marines and misunderstood critters how original!

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I like going back to it. Even the extended version. But I have to admit that the complaints are justified. I don't care about them and I like how long this movie is but the criticism has merit. The original is better thanks to its pacing but I'd say it's still only a masterpiece by the virtue of being so important to the genre. It's 9/10 movie thanks to Bruce Cabot.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It was the last great adventure movie

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This. When will we ever get another 4 hour monster movie?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Actual masterpieces of the genre are usually between 90 and 100 minutes long and they don't have to be longer. I like this movie and I watch the extended version and I like how long it is but at the same time I agree it didn't have to be this long or introduce subplots for bit characters that didn't go anywhere.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >save me, Spinosaurus!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Kong's cinematic history is almost entirely just endless repeat of the same story. And here we have the part where he kills creatures more interesting than him.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I like dinosaurs too, but they definitely have less to them than Kong. There's a reason he keeps getting movies. He's fairly intelligent and has emotions. Trex has pretty much run through everything it can do, and they just keep introducing bigger and meaner versions to kill it off.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          In the original at least Kong is a part of a larger story. If his role was played by any other type of creature I wouldn't find him any less sympathetic. The Jackson version really showed him as more of a character than the 33 version.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It was this fricking scene for me. I'm terrified of underwater monsters as it is, but this was just anxiety inducing

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The monsters are the best part of the movie. Other than that it's just okay. This deleted scene should have been in the movie but I think they dropped it because it would have gotten them an R rating.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's in the extended cut. I always watch this one. It adds more action on Skull Island and a few scenes in New York so even for those who complain about the pacing issues and length of the movie won't find anything to really complain about.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Me and my Dad loved it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      My Dad and I* I meant

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Too long

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Shut up adhd phone watcher. Men are talking.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >jack black
    What were they thinking

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He was good tho

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Characters in the 1933 Kong are kind of bad but Denham was the exception and he was developed further in the sequel. Jackson's Kong had no sequel so Denham faces no consequences or we just don't see them but he's different than the one from 1933 who was an arrogant adventurer. Cooper's alter ego. Jack Black was just a dick and a coward.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Skull Island did it better and I double fricking dare you to convince me otherwise.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That movie looked like someone peed on the lens. Everything has this shitty instagram yellow color grading.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Post examples.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Skull Island did it better and I double fricking dare you to convince me otherwise.

          The editing in skull island is shit tier.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah no you're fricking with me. That or you're being ironic.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              That looked like dogshit compared to this

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                > Again the bug pit scene.
                Take off your nostalgia goggles son.

                If we count Son of Kong, because it's so strongly tied to the first movie, that's 9 movies. Half of which are in some way remakes of the 1933 movie, at least in some elements. King Kong Lives is maybe the most original and also by far the worst.

                The TV series might actually be hidden gems from what I can tell. Highly serialised of course and very much the monster of the week affairs.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                The shitty pee colored graveyard scene was obviously Skull Island’s Bug Pit attempt.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I see you're unable to take the two films as separate entities anon. Reminder that the entire thing is CGI and involves four actors. Shit's Jack's best role since the Jackal and Billy fricking Elliot over there is shooting bugs off the other guys back with his fricking eyes closed.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                We’re comparing movies. We compared the shitty pee colored skullcrawler graveyard scene, and the Bug Pit scene.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Comparing, but one of us is failing to take each film into individual circumstantial context. You sound somewhat autist anon.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                > take each film into individual circumstantial context
                Why?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Because if you don't then everything is just a shallow copy of ancient Greek tragedy.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Oh and I’m the autist.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I didn't say it was a bad thing, anon.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Me either.

                Because if you don't then everything is just a shallow copy of ancient Greek tragedy.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Which Ancient Greek tragedy had a giant gorilla fighting 3 trexes?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Probably something to do with Hercules. Dude fought a lot of things and was immortalised in song and theatre because of it.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Hercules isn’t giant or a monster. King Kong is a giant monster that fights other monsters. So which geek tragedy then?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                The tragedy of hercules written by Euripides involves the gods (outsiders) sending him crazy (king Kong's rage), killing his Human family and then dying to poison (bullets).

                Took two seconds in Google anon.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Hercules is a human//god hero. King Kong isn’t. He’s a beast, monster, king Kong isn’t a hero. That’s all the new movies with capeshit King Kong.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                The ancient Greek heroes were quite monstrous anon. It's hard to understate the raw power of strength that Hercules had until you consider this here was a man perfectly capable of ripping another man apart with his bare hands, and did so.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Ok, and King Kong is a creature, not an Ancient Greek hero. He’s probably what the Ancient Greek heroes killed.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You are aware that the entire reason we have monster movies is because of the ancients coming up with fantastical and wondrously terrifying god-like monsters before Christian puritanism fricked everything up right?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Prove it b***h.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                2 seconds in Google, doublec**t. Pay particular attention to censorship of art. https://www.britannica.com/topic/censorship/Medieval-Christendom

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                King Kong isn’t a fantastical and wondrously terrifying god-like monster.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Not in Jackson's movie he isn't.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Or in the original

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Pretty sure if they could have used our modern film tech then he would have been.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                ???
                He was a god like creature to the stupid black savages. Not to civilized man.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You asked me to show you the pee colored instagram filter on Skull island and I showed it to you. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=auafv2YsNR4

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You showed me a scene where the filter was deliberately used as part of the set. You cannot be serious unless you are a massive moron.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                > using instagram filters at all
                Why pee colored though? It’s so distracting.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Idk ask the wachowski bros when they made the matrix.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                too creepy

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Skull Island was beautifully shot but had no dinosaurs. I've gotten over that, although I'm bored to death of that Kong because they suck his dick too hard recently. But I'm glad it's not another remake. Kong lost its status as a monster because it never became a franchise and just a collection of remakes. And Merian C. Cooper wanted it to be a franchise, he had lots of ideas. But he was exactly 20 years ahead of his time and RKO only let him make a cheapquel (that's still pretty decent).

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Having the sheer fricking hubris to make an original content in the film industry rather than shamelessly ripping off someone else's work and doing it well should give it a mandatory 4 stars on anyone's rating.

        Honestly I think back to Jackson's version and I cringe. The videogame was okay though.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Jackson did exactly what you just described moron

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Go frick yourself you turbohomosexual.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The best part of Kong was the theme that 'Beauty killed the Beast'. It's a complete story with Kong dying at the end. He's not meant to be Godzilla, appearing eternally in ten thousand random movies and each time returning to the jungle until he's needed to find another monster

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Not every character is flexible enough to keep a stable franchise with regular movies. But King Kong was supposed to be one. Cooper had his idea, O'Brien had his. Nothing came out of it because the original was too big, RKO got scared. Everybody kept making cheaper gothic horror movies instead.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          8 films and 2 TV series just saying.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            If we count Son of Kong, because it's so strongly tied to the first movie, that's 9 movies. Half of which are in some way remakes of the 1933 movie, at least in some elements. King Kong Lives is maybe the most original and also by far the worst.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I remember even as a little kid I found that line so incredibly cringe. “I guess, in the end, beauty really did kill the beast.” BRAVO JACKSON. INCREDIBLE WRITING BRO

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            ?t=137
            >1933

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              > Shamelessly referencing an earlier film.
              Disrespectful.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Recreating a terrible line doesn’t make it any less terrible.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                It's a remake of the story kek. It's the entire damn point of the original Kong story. Kong will kill any and everything, but when he sees the pretty girl, it tames him, and he'll do everything to protect her. Even when it gets him subdued, when he wouldn't have gotten captured otherwise, then brought to the mainland, he breaks free and tries to go defensive with her on top of the tallest building. But he can no longer hide and he dies.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I like skull island, but the peter jackson kong's soundtrack fricking shits all over it

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Jacksons version of Skull Island was much cooler

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        This. Jackson's skull Island actually seems like a real uncharted ancient place, with its own primeval history and ecology. The world building was excellent. Skull Island in the new one looks like yellow filter Vietnam with some CGI lizards walking around.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You're not wrong

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    how come none of the Skull Island creatures ever escaped?

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you just know

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That's racist

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This is an incredibly underserved masturbation session.

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It was such a horrible film. The first time I’ve been bored in a cinema. Cut the running time by a third and you might have a good movie. As it stands it’s an self-indulgent mess that overstays its welcome.

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >2005

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's Jackson going full fanboy with his favorite childhood movie and I love it for that, the sheer passion that he had for King Kong and his world just captivated me and made me a fan when I saw it as a kid. The video game also played a huge part I loved it.

    Even the false documentary about Skull Island from the DVD showed how much he cared about it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Holt shit I had no idea this existed thanks anon!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      When I heard they were making a skull island movie, I was expecting 2 hours of this. Not the boring bullshit we got instead.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      > ancient civilization that lived with monsters
      Crazy how much the new godzilla movies ripped off Peter Jackson.

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i aught to watch this again. i loved it when i was a kid and it first came out, haven't seen it since i was a teenager though. the natives were truly terrifying and disturbing in this. i hate watching the ending though

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ausgay? They had it on TV yesterday.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *