This is the future that Public Domain will create

>less people are going to create creative stories and will use a rehash of public domain stories
>edgy and trash films will be popular because it's going to be cheap and use "shocking marketing"
>real creative projects will be cut in networks because it be more cheaper and more merchandisable if it was an original show
Congrats Public Domain supporters, you didn't predict these thoughts didn't you? You just wanted to own "LE EVIL COMPANIES" but don't realize that this is going to lead to a massive cannibalization of IPs which lead to some weird dystopian shithole of meaningless media, is this the future you want?

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >shitposter doesn't believe in freedom
    unamerican homosexual.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You mean shill poster.
      Hes a lobbyist for anti-public domain griups suxh as disney and warner bros.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >less people are going to create creative stories and will use a rehash of public domain stories
      >edgy and trash films will be popular because it's going to be cheap and use "shocking marketing"
      >real creative projects will be cut in networks because it be more cheaper and more merchandisable if it was an original show
      Congrats Public Domain supporters, you didn't predict these thoughts didn't you? You just wanted to own "LE EVIL COMPANIES" but don't realize that this is going to lead to a massive cannibalization of IPs which lead to some weird dystopian shithole of meaningless media, is this the future you want?

      You mean shill poster.
      Hes a lobbyist for anti-public domain griups suxh as disney and warner bros.

      HELLO FELLOW ANIMATION ENTHUSIASTS.

      IS IT NOT SAD TO SEE SOME BELOVED Disney™ CLASSICS BEING BESMIRCHED?

      WE SHOULD VOTE TO EXTEND COPYRIGHT AGAIN. OTHERWISE WE ARE NO BETTER THAN THOSE DIRTY COMMIES.

      creativity = making straight characters gay and trans people who spout slogans from left-wing NGOs

      Making Pooh scary is just a cultural retaliation to him being a kiddie figure for so long

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        making characters lgbt is just a cultural retaliation from bitter millenials/zoomers who hated going to Sunday mass with their parents

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I think the retaliation to LGBT will be showing the less-glamorous, impoverished side of "white" life. Drug addiction, eating disorders, Satanic Panic, teen pregnancy, basically guilt-tripping LGBT for being well-off financially

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not OP, but you're not making your case.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I hope this is a shitpost or a Disney bot, because otherwise I feel sorry for you.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Mouseshills get the rope

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    HELLO FELLOW ANIMATION ENTHUSIASTS.

    IS IT NOT SAD TO SEE SOME BELOVED Disney™ CLASSICS BEING BESMIRCHED?

    WE SHOULD VOTE TO EXTEND COPYRIGHT AGAIN. OTHERWISE WE ARE NO BETTER THAN THOSE DIRTY COMMIES.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Look at all the comments
      They know I am right and I know they never gave a frick about animation and creativity, they are a bunch of menaces to society, a bunch of fricking goons that just want to destroy instead of created, I have unmasked co for what they are. A self jerking group that only want chaos and spread its hatred across the animation industry. They know that what I'm doing is right, public domain is a bunch of bullshit they created so they can ruin what other has created, you all a bunch of pieces of shit! Frick you all!

      Reminder that OP is just the "I hate Smiling Friends" homosexual making posts about the public domain until season 2 of Smiling Friends comes out since he doesn't have Smiling Friends threads to shit up anymore
      https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/131300837/#131306485
      He got called out last time and immediately deleted the thread

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >less people
    It's *Fewer, you ESL trash.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Seethe. Eternal private domain is communist and it should only last 20-30 years at most, or 10 years with lifetime percentile payments to to the creator, not the life of the author plus 70 years, making you wait 140 years which is over half of the time our country has been around.
    Companies should have to make new characters if they want creative control instead of remaining stagnant.
    Homer's Iliad and Oddyssey were a product of hundreds of years of creative collaboration, and it's not possible to have the same creative culture today that produced those works.
    People don't need eternal copyright to recognize edgy shit as shit either.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    shut up and keep sucking disney's small circumcised wiener

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Good, I hope the next one will be Goofy raping all the new disneyshit characters from the last decade to now

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it's still better than it being held by soulless corporate trash.
    look at the fricking state of star wars and tell me right now lucas should have sold it to disney instead of making it open source.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      being fair there's enough star wars fan films out there it might as well be open source.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        "Open source" and "public domain" aren't interchangeable terms.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This is only the first Winnie movie that is coming out since he's now free of royalties. You can hardly except all the movies featuring the character to be the same

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    imagine if someone made a horror movie where people dressed as disney characters would one by one kill the disney executives

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Oh no how will Disney get around to portraying Pooh bear as a brave LGBToid now that everyone can just profit of it?
    The horror!

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Public Domain is just like Copyright. Only as good as the quality of its writers!

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Slasher Winnie Pooh is still 100% more creative than Disney doing a live action remake of old movies that were already adaptations of stories in from the public domain.
    The amount of company shills this board has sometimes is pathetic.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Look at all the comments
    They know I am right and I know they never gave a frick about animation and creativity, they are a bunch of menaces to society, a bunch of fricking goons that just want to destroy instead of created, I have unmasked co for what they are. A self jerking group that only want chaos and spread its hatred across the animation industry. They know that what I'm doing is right, public domain is a bunch of bullshit they created so they can ruin what other has created, you all a bunch of pieces of shit! Frick you all!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Eat shit, Disney shill.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      creativity = making straight characters gay and trans people who spout slogans from left-wing NGOs

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I no longer care. Let the horrors come from the public domain. Those that were suppose to protect properties turned them into bad lgtb whatever propaganda, As such, let it all burn with the insanity of fanfiction.net with every stories contradicting itself. May Boba Fett be Little Billy older brother. I just don’t care anymore. Maybe someone will create something new and good without the garbage.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Congrats Public Domain supporters, you didn't predict these thoughts didn't you?
    Are you asking us if we didn't predict bad art?

    Of course we did, you absolute idiot, but we get bad art with the alternative too so whats your fricking point?

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Mouseshills get the rope.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    based, i want those IPs ruined instead of being crappy woke shit

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      this isn't a bad point. if people ruin the image of every know brand, creatives will be once again forced to actually come up with new ideas rather than just preserving the IPs that exist.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah no. What was done was done with stuff that didn't go public domain. If the big bad corpos wanted to do something with it further it would only end with cold meat being heated instead. Thus a slasher Winnie is far more creative than anything newer any corpo would create after the original creations.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Frick off shill.

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Sucks that Disney can't use public domain characters, oh wait.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This is a very good point anon.

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >This is the future
    Okay. Better than BlackRock owned massive corporations dominating all media and using it to propagandize to and indoctrinate people with a sibgular message that nobody wants to hear and compel them to perpetuate the cycle of consoomerism.

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Eat wiener Disney shill. Frick the mouse

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    trademarks still exists moron, you can try to make a sequel to steamboat willie or super man but guess what, you will get sued because your sequel is to similar to content of this character that isn't public domain, you don't think disney will fight tooth and nail so you can't have your steam boat willie idea be black and white?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Simply being in black and white almost certainly won't be grounds for a successful lawsuit. They'll have to be very careful about which content they pursue because they'll run the risk of setting new case law and legal precedents that will work against their interests.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        the fear is there they have one frivoulous lawsuits before thats why you will never see anyone besides really tiny insignificant people try to actually do something that isn't parody or horror.

        Perfect example is hotel translyvania, they had to change franks design because universal threatened to sue them because frankenstein is public domain they have the trademark for bolt neck and green frankenstein

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Good.

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    slit your throat shillBlack person

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Shill, protip. You need to use a cleaner image next time. This looks like it was reuploaded to facebook 20 times over. Also, frick you and your family, die in a fire while your children watch, you useful idiot c**t.

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the people who make this kind of stuff wouldn't have made anything more creative anyway so its a false dilemma

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    WB already did this with the Banana Splits.

    I don’t see why you think not being the public domain prevents this.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Under copyright law something like a Winnie the Pooh horror film would ostensibily be protected as parody even if Winnie the Pooh's appearances weren't in the public domain. Trademark infringement is the big question. If Disney owns the trademark and can prove that you're using it unlawfully or in such a way that damages their brand you would have a problem.

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Disney already made that Once Upon a Time show where many beloved characters were evil.

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This your first experience of this? All of Disneys classic movies are public domain stories, anon. Its why you still see pinochio and cinderalla etc getting made by pajeet studios, even still. Disney does not and never did own those IPs, and the shit adaptations of them do not invalidate the canon work which anyone can adapt however they see fit. Noone can own or carry on the story outside of their own version of it, its a finished work once it enters PD.

    Theres countless Shakespeare movies, alot of them are fricking awful, theres even ones which try to make it modern with Black person speak and raps, this garbage existing does not mean it is now the new canon simply for existing.

    PD exists so that companies (like Disney) cannot own someones creative work long after they are dead where they can just assign themselves as the new author, writing canon and rewriting the original work forever, going against the creators vision and views even, they cant say no so the company is the one who now draws the line on what is canon and what can be "fixed" in the original work because its theirs. PD is a way to put a full stop on the end of a legacy when the artist/original creator is dead, otherwise you get shit like people rewriting and writing sequels to the LotR as canon where their experience is simply that they were given permission from Amazon and have no writing credits to their name, but are now writing "LotR4:Aragorns transition" and have another 20 books in the works for which will all be canon, where they are the sole key holders of the IP forever doing this as though they were the actual author.

    Public Domain saves a work by letting it end with its original creator.

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Of course there will be lazy and exploitative c**ts who will take advantage of public domain properties to make cheap cash-ins. That downside pales in comparison to the potential for better content to be produced once audiences tire of lazy shock value crap. Shit is shit and shit is forgotten quickly, but the potential for average, above average, or even genuinely great content to be produced from properties in the public domain is too great to let go to waste.

    More importantly the knowledge that rights will eventually go to public domain puts pressure (however little) on content producers to continue producing content instead of just rereleasing, repackaging, rehashing, rebooting, etc. There's a bill in consideration right now that would roll back corporate copyrights to 56 years and I think that's probably the best piece of legislation I've heard of in recent memory.

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >>edgy and trash films will be popular because it's going to be cheap and use "shocking marketing"
    You say this like the return of pulp fiction is a bad thing.

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Disney rehashes their own product for the 74737473th time
    😀

    >Anyone else rehashes a Disney product once
    D:<

    Reminder that Disney shills aren't people and you're morally obligated to kick their ass if you ever see one.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *