Why the frick did i even tried to watch their "Escape from New York" review. >First thing we see in the movie is Space Cop (tm)! (talking about the guard in a jeep) >Lol he is basically a Space Cop (tm) (talking about Snake Plissken)
Fricking homosexuals.
>Star Wars fans are embarrassing
Wow how profound. Black person we already knew that since forever. Doesn’t mean Lucas is not a hack who fricked up his own legacy. He could have remained the king if he did do it
OT are GOAT
Prequel are soulless trash
Sequels are soulless trash
They are cringy no life nerds but they are not wrong in their criticism
Why don’t you counter their arguments cause it looks like you’re just coping?
How are the prequels bad compared to the OT? Anti-prequelgays never explain this. They've just spent the past 20 years whining that the prequels are bad, even though they can't really articulate why the OT is supposedly so much better. It's always just something incosequential like midichlorians, Jar Jar Binks, or le spinny lightsabers. Disney Wars is what happens when prequel-hating xoomer manchildren get their opportunity to make Star Wars movies, and it's been nothing but shit.
Love him or hate him modern cinema owes it all to Lucas . He wasn't out to be a Francis Coppola director. He's a rebel a maverick . Pushing the limits and advancing the medium . That's what people forget .
It's bait in the sense that I'm not educating your ass. Clearly you just want to shoot down or ignore any genuine criticisms so what would the point be?
>I won't give any genuine criticisms of the prequels because you'll just shoot them down so there's no point >but they're bad movies just trust me
lmao
Ok, I'll give you one. The art direction in II and III are an eyesore. Now tell me how much worse looking Tatooine from the OT is compared to Geonosis
2 years ago
Anonymous
Ok I can understand why someone would think the set design in II and III could be too busy, but I think it was a wise decision to make Geonosis something besides "Tatooine but with bugs."
2 years ago
Anonymous
i absolutely love episode 2s style
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Intro scene >Throne room duel >The night scene where anakin wakes from his nightmare >Anakin deciding to save palpatine >The whole scene of Anakin saving palpatine >The destruction of the Jedi >Obiwan on Grevious' planet (can't remember the fricking name) >The whole mustafar scene
III's art direction was some of the best in the series. You're either smoking something or you're a pseud with crank theories on filmmaking.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The only ones not an eyesore are Anakin waking up, because it's dark, and Anakin saving Palpatine, again because it's dark. I could feel my retinas burning reading the rest of your list
still have never seen an answer for why the anticipated disney wars first trailer opened with a jump scare of a sweaty panting Black person and a space balls reference. so completely out of place and bizarre i literally cant think of a reason, im not trying to be ironic or ask a rhetorical question
the fact that you responded to my post without even trying to toss an explanation out there just adds to my confusion. will we ever get an answer? did the israelite say it was for social justice reasons or something at least? every seems to be silent on the issue even though its a image thats burned into people minds, even the ones who never say the movie.
Actor aside I think it was an effective shot in building mystery with something familiar. Why are we focused on a stormtrooper without a helmet in distress for the first time?
But I know you're just wondering why they decided to focus on an unattractive black actor. They either didn't care or notice how he looked or it was for SJW points.
2 years ago
Anonymous
youre completely ignoring the fact that it was also a space balls reference for some inexplicable reason. no one saw that shot and was intrigued by the mystery of what he was doing there for in lore reasons. they either wondered why tracy morgan and saturday night live was making a star wars joke commercial or how the space balls thing connects in. is it supposed to be a joke? is it social commentary about what used to be a joke isnt anymore? am i supposed to be scared of the ugly sweating Black person? am i supposed to support him? if im supposed to be on his side (which would presumably be the case since hes one of the """heroes""") why did they open with a literal jump scare, a shot thats only used to shock and frighten viewers?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Spaceballs
Bad Robot (or JJ) does things like that all the time. No bigger meaning >no one saw that shot and was intrigued by the mystery of what he was doing there for in lore reasons
That's simply not true, I cant entertain anything else you wrote if you cant accept this
2 years ago
Anonymous
storm troopers on dune was literally a thing already in the first movie. nothing is special about it other than him being a Black person, the shot being a jump scare, and it being some weird space balls joke which are all meta reasons
Why? Becuase you're attached to some hack who made some cartoons and then lost his touch? It's about filmmakers vs. the public and the ethics of changing the work that was already released. It's about something more than just some has been brand you're attached to.
I wonder what ever happened to all these boomer and gen x manchildren that ragged on the prequels. I bet they loved the Disney movies and celebrated when George sold starwars
Not as embarrassing as this
Why the frick did i even tried to watch their "Escape from New York" review.
>First thing we see in the movie is Space Cop (tm)! (talking about the guard in a jeep)
>Lol he is basically a Space Cop (tm) (talking about Snake Plissken)
Fricking homosexuals.
>that shitty Man of Steel gag they loved so much was also on the poster/cover
I like RLM but goddamn.
winner winner chicken dinner
<====second most embarrassing
You paid $499 for this?
Someone apparently did
Let's make it trinity
Funnier when you show it to someone who has no idea who RLM. They have no expectations and are just bewildered by it.
this was bad, but those Channel Awesome movies are a trillion times worse
Kickassia is legitimately entertaining, cringe and all
It aged about as well as the younglings that met Anakin
is the whole movie just neckbeard tears?
Essentially yeah.
No, OP hasn't actually watched it and is just assuming its content based upon the title.
George Lucas raped our childhood!
lel
Well, they wouldnt be fat if they werent raped as kids.
No, the prequels are.
>2010
Jesus I thought this was from when the movies were actually coming out. This just makes it sadder.
So when’s The People vs. The Walt Disney Corporation?
the intentions may be embarrassing but the things the documentary shows when viewed on their one is a very good showcase of extreme entitlement
is there a documentary or video essay analysing it yet? My curiosity has been piqued
Why don't you just analyze it yourself.
look at those pathetic basedboys. theyd never get away with flaunting their manchild status so proudly today.
this movie ended with some old French guy dressed as Anakin praising George and saying the true fans were with him
Who's laughing now?
>prequel zoomies at it again
how did you homosexual even find out about this one?
Cope prequelcuck
>Star Wars fans are embarrassing
Wow how profound. Black person we already knew that since forever. Doesn’t mean Lucas is not a hack who fricked up his own legacy. He could have remained the king if he did do it
OT are GOAT
Prequel are soulless trash
Sequels are soulless trash
>Likes ROTJ
>Also thinks prequels are soulless
Ok anon
Prequels are many things. Soulless isn't one of them though.
How are the prequels bad compared to the OT? Anti-prequelgays never explain this. They've just spent the past 20 years whining that the prequels are bad, even though they can't really articulate why the OT is supposedly so much better. It's always just something incosequential like midichlorians, Jar Jar Binks, or le spinny lightsabers. Disney Wars is what happens when prequel-hating xoomer manchildren get their opportunity to make Star Wars movies, and it's been nothing but shit.
From a filmmaking and directing standpoint they're inferior.
Love him or hate him modern cinema owes it all to Lucas . He wasn't out to be a Francis Coppola director. He's a rebel a maverick . Pushing the limits and advancing the medium . That's what people forget .
Oh, I like the prequels. But they are inferior to the OT which anon was asking
this
lmao what an in depth response this has to be bait
It's bait in the sense that I'm not educating your ass. Clearly you just want to shoot down or ignore any genuine criticisms so what would the point be?
>I won't give any genuine criticisms of the prequels because you'll just shoot them down so there's no point
>but they're bad movies just trust me
lmao
Ok, I'll give you one. The art direction in II and III are an eyesore. Now tell me how much worse looking Tatooine from the OT is compared to Geonosis
Ok I can understand why someone would think the set design in II and III could be too busy, but I think it was a wise decision to make Geonosis something besides "Tatooine but with bugs."
i absolutely love episode 2s style
>Intro scene
>Throne room duel
>The night scene where anakin wakes from his nightmare
>Anakin deciding to save palpatine
>The whole scene of Anakin saving palpatine
>The destruction of the Jedi
>Obiwan on Grevious' planet (can't remember the fricking name)
>The whole mustafar scene
III's art direction was some of the best in the series. You're either smoking something or you're a pseud with crank theories on filmmaking.
The only ones not an eyesore are Anakin waking up, because it's dark, and Anakin saving Palpatine, again because it's dark. I could feel my retinas burning reading the rest of your list
Concession: ACCEPTED
Cheesy CGI, nonsensical plot, stupid characters, droning, inane diatribes, sterile action...
So basically just like the OT except the OT had cheesy puppets instead of CGI.
I don't like how a lot of the shots are composited, I don't hate the prequels or anything
You will just stick your fingers into your ears and drown it out.
The Teen Awakens.
>npcs would have liked him more if he made capeshit to pander to the lowest common denominator
yeah we know
>OT are GOAT
ROTJ was kinda dumb, though.
They are cringy no life nerds but they are not wrong in their criticism
Why don’t you counter their arguments cause it looks like you’re just coping?
Pre-Disney Star Wars fandom was unironically soul
>t. seething zoomie
I'm glad Disney gave these people exactly what they wanted: Star Wars without George Lucas.
still have never seen an answer for why the anticipated disney wars first trailer opened with a jump scare of a sweaty panting Black person and a space balls reference. so completely out of place and bizarre i literally cant think of a reason, im not trying to be ironic or ask a rhetorical question
Webm unrelated?
the fact that you responded to my post without even trying to toss an explanation out there just adds to my confusion. will we ever get an answer? did the israelite say it was for social justice reasons or something at least? every seems to be silent on the issue even though its a image thats burned into people minds, even the ones who never say the movie.
Actor aside I think it was an effective shot in building mystery with something familiar. Why are we focused on a stormtrooper without a helmet in distress for the first time?
But I know you're just wondering why they decided to focus on an unattractive black actor. They either didn't care or notice how he looked or it was for SJW points.
youre completely ignoring the fact that it was also a space balls reference for some inexplicable reason. no one saw that shot and was intrigued by the mystery of what he was doing there for in lore reasons. they either wondered why tracy morgan and saturday night live was making a star wars joke commercial or how the space balls thing connects in. is it supposed to be a joke? is it social commentary about what used to be a joke isnt anymore? am i supposed to be scared of the ugly sweating Black person? am i supposed to support him? if im supposed to be on his side (which would presumably be the case since hes one of the """heroes""") why did they open with a literal jump scare, a shot thats only used to shock and frighten viewers?
>Spaceballs
Bad Robot (or JJ) does things like that all the time. No bigger meaning
>no one saw that shot and was intrigued by the mystery of what he was doing there for in lore reasons
That's simply not true, I cant entertain anything else you wrote if you cant accept this
storm troopers on dune was literally a thing already in the first movie. nothing is special about it other than him being a Black person, the shot being a jump scare, and it being some weird space balls joke which are all meta reasons
despite several unedited original release whinny manchilderen created a cult of whining against george lucas
I bet they feel pretty stupid now
From what I recall, this film is mostly about the special editions.
Why? Becuase you're attached to some hack who made some cartoons and then lost his touch? It's about filmmakers vs. the public and the ethics of changing the work that was already released. It's about something more than just some has been brand you're attached to.
which one of the fat virgins in the flick were you
>People are so braindead they're conflating fans having embarrassing behavior and being attached to IPs as seething about a movie getting criticism
This thread proves RLM was right about everything.
I wonder what ever happened to all these boomer and gen x manchildren that ragged on the prequels. I bet they loved the Disney movies and celebrated when George sold starwars
most of them accepted that star wars was dead after tpm, the rest after aotc, and moved on with their lives.
disney star wars was then a curiosity, and tlj erased that curiosity.