>this made boomers seethe and rage with anger

>this made boomers seethe and rage with anger

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    It wasn’t that bad

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Never happened

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      He's right, you heard what Synder said.

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    You know nothing of our seething.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      South Park is very popular. Please understand.

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Why are so many Cinemaphile gays obsessed with age. There will always be people older and younger than you, welcome to life.

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah I never got why this episode was so controversial.

    I grant that it's not a particularly good episode, but it's far from the personal insult that critics seemed to treat it as.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      There may not be contiuity of events in The Simpsons, but there had been continuity of CHARACTER. This episode is incompatible with the character Skinner had been all along. How can he be a repressed manchild who's never gotten out from under his "mother's" thumb if he didn't meet this woman until well into his 20s and freely decide to "adopt" her?

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I actually remembering liking the episode as a kid. Was surprised when somebody reacted with disgust to me referencing it years later. I can see why people hated the twist, especially since Skinner is one of the best characters on the show. But ignoring that element, the episode itself is decent.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      A mountain out of a molehill. Anyone claiming this episode the antichrist looks particularly silly given the Scully era was right afterwards

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >A mountain out of a molehill.
        This.
        While the moment itself is rightfully bad it's not the sudden car crash into a wall 'this is where Simpsons died and was buried' some people will say. It WAS where everything did start to fall apart and they just did whatever the fuck because they were running out of ideas.
        It was the beginning of the end, not the end itself.

  7. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    For me was the GaGa-Lisa episode

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      The show had been bad for years when this aired and I was only watching it out of habit at that point, but that is the episode that finally made me give up on the Simpsons and I haven't seen an episode of it since

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        This. It's like Jar Jar, it's the lightning rod. The bad idea so obvious anyone can point to it without having to explain all the other bad ideas around it.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >beginning of season 9
        >bad for years beforehand
        lol try not to out yourself as tourist scum

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    It was a funny episode but taking an established character and retconning him was a bad idea

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      *a extremely bad idea
      ftfy

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Up yours children

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I didn't even know about this episode's controversy until years later.

  11. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Kinda ruined the character forever in retrospect.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      he's been dead for 12 years who cares

  12. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Was it one of the Simpons writers who said the episode "punished the audience for paying attention"?

  13. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Has skinner showed up again?

  14. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      SKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        damn, he actually says "SEEEEEEEEYMORE!!!!"

        i always forget.

  15. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    It's just a dumb idea. They obviously never planned it, threw it in for no reason, and status quo'd themselves so the big character twist had zero future story potential. What was the point?

  16. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    If you want seethe listen to the commentary for the episode with the writer Ken Keeler. The other people get uncomfortable while he rants about the fans not understanding his art.

  17. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    They did it again with Fat Tony.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Not like Fat Tony was an important character to begin with though

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        He still had the few episodes dedicated to him though.
        You now remember he had a son who has his uncle parading around as his dad

  18. 1 week ago
    truteal

    >this made Simpsons Fans seethe and rage with anger

  19. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
  20. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I WISH this was as bad as the series got. If a season nowadays was nothing but episodes of this caliber it'd be considered the best one in decades.

  21. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I am 37 years old and this episode never bothered me.

    Rewatching it as an adult, the worst thing I can say about it is that it is a little drab. Like, the main complaint I can muster is "eh, it's not particularly exciting OR funny."

Your email address will not be published.