The practical effects for his boat was the boat actually being able to do that. That's how boats work and veteran sailors are amazing to watch in action. It's also why people had to be press ganged historically, a lot of people fricking died doing that shit.
They weren't like today's producers and prioritized actual practical effects. Zoomers nowadays are really bad at distinguishing what's real from what isn't because of years of CGI. And some of the CGI in today's movies are really bad, it's just that your average Zoomer has no baseline in the form of practical effects to understand why it sucks.
Huh, that actually makes a lot of sense. I was born at the tail end of practical effects in movies ('92) but I can't stand gratuitous CGI in films because it looks super fake. Particularly in the movement, CGI lacks weight and just looks wrong to me, to the point where any mostly CGI film is automatically shit to me. I can't even watch MCU stuff, moronic plots aside.
It makes sense that zoomers born after practical effects wouldn't understand why it looks fake as frick because they have nothing to compare it to.
Huh, that actually makes a lot of sense. I was born at the tail end of practical effects in movies ('92) but I can't stand gratuitous CGI in films because it looks super fake. Particularly in the movement, CGI lacks weight and just looks wrong to me, to the point where any mostly CGI film is automatically shit to me. I can't even watch MCU stuff, moronic plots aside.
It makes sense that zoomers born after practical effects wouldn't understand why it looks fake as frick because they have nothing to compare it to.
Old movies still exist, do zoomers not watch anything from before they were born? I was born in the 90s and a lot of my favourite movies growing up were from the 70s/80s.
>Old movies still exist, do zoomers not watch anything from before they were born?
most of them in fact do not. there is very little cultural understanding among zoomers in general from before they were born. movies, music, vidya games etc from the 90s and before are scary to zoomzooms.
>This movie shouldn't be technically possible in 1995
years since i've seen it but i don't recall anything standing out as technically groundbreaking, didn't the just shoot in massive pools?
i had some doubts but recent Chinese moon satelite actually checked on places where NASA claimed to land, Lunar Rover with tracks are literally visible on the pictures.
Sure but technology doesn't just advance linearly. It has sudden bursts in advancement in different areas at different times. Aside from cgi, not a lot has really changed in the technogy we have to make a film with practical effects.
Take it from me. The older you get the faster your perception of time becomes. 27 years feels like an eternity when you're young but when you're older 20 years passes like nothing. I remeber 1995 like it was yesterday. Technologically the world wasn't that different. Everything has just been small incremental improvements on technology that already existed in the 90s.
>normie >on 4chin
Bruh
Nobody is really 'normie' here. No real normie will tolerate this site, especially now that it has lost its last bits of humanity.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Believe me buddy, it was much less "humane" earlier. Normies just can't wrap their minds around why anyone would anonymously post, or why they'd see Black person alot.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Exactly, it was so much worse back in the earlier days when the site received less attention.
I dont really have an excuse for why i haven't watched this movie yet. Been around for long enough ffs. Maybe ill sit down today and see what the hype is about. This isnt just a meme movie is it? Background movie or full attention?
it's a meme cause it was a catastrophic cluster frick and massive money sink. When you watch it just remember that the entire floating city thing they had to build two of, because the first one sunk. Movie ain't bad though
The film is not that bad. It is of middling quality, with an interesting premise and some fun set pieces. Much like 12 Monkeys, it is a somewhat mediocre film with big name actors and interesting moments we get to peer into remnants of disaster from the future. I would recommend giving it a watch.
>Background movie
Bro it's your first watch, I know I'm being meme'd right now but god damn just watch it.
t.held it off till last year, and I thought it was pretty good
I like dystopian movies though.
The practical and digital effect technology required to make this movie didn’t exist in 1995. It was actually easier to flood the Earth than to fake it.
Based Costner saved the movie. Invested 22 million dollars into it, which is the cost of the set you see on the poster and took over directing after Reynolds got butthurt and walked out. All while going through a bitter divorce.
>the paper guy in waterworld dies again
that's kim fricking coates you uncultured swine. he was like david morse or tom sizemore in the 90s. in fricking everything.
Yeah but if ridley Scott could pull off blade rubber in the late 70s early 80s when they filmed it, waterworld isn't that technically challenging for 1995. It was all practical effects and a huge barge in the the sea.
they're actually doing that
but you just know they're gonna ruin it with global warming, climate change and feminism propaganda like they did with furyroad
Most don’t realize how bad this trajectory is and there’s not many options out of this ride into hell. We will need a dictator to crawl out of this. It’s inevitable.
I remember watching a scene where Kevin Costner's character was offered some asian dicky to impregnate but he refused because he didnt want to pass on his mutant genes. Watched it again a few years back and that scene wasnt there. Was this really in the movie or am I imagining things??
I remember that too.
There is a very extended cut of Waterworld, forgot what it's called, though I don't even think it was in that. I just watched it to death on standard VHS edition as a kid.
Where did you watch it? I do have the feeling streaming centers change the movie. I have my brother's netflix account and movies are always quicker or certain scenes end sooner or something...
>tfw waterworld/global ocean is my favourite setting in any media >tfw almost no content to cater to it
Yes I know about Gargantia, why is there so little media for the most kino setting going?
Did the primary set (the floating town) sink and they had to build a new one? This film is also why everyone assumed Titanic would be a bomb. Huge water production, way over budget, egomaniac director.
their entire set (with most of the money sunk) and they remade the movie with scraps and next to nothing
thats why there's no 'town' fortress nothing, just an atoll and a tanker
It is considered a "box office bomb," despite selling a lot of tickets, but the budget was too out of control. I believe one set even burned down or sunk or something. Great movie especially the Ulysses Cut
Almost everyone agrees that The Postman was shit and The Postman is just Costner remaking Waterworld on dry land. There's a reason why his career dried up and it's because these films just didn't spark much interest. It's contrarian/revisionist to say Waterworld is a beloved classic when twenty years ago no one would have counted it among the best films of the nineties. You can look at contemporary reviews for proof too.
Maybe its me, but for me this movie was like Mad Max on water. Replace fuel with water and desert with the sea. Even the little kid getting a present was from Mad Max.
>Jack Nicholson, Gary Oldman, Gary Busey, Samuel L. Jackson, Laurence Fishburne, Gene Hackman and James Caan all refused the role of The Deacon
Damn, if Dennis Hopper wasn't available they would probably never cast this role.
>They spend all this money on this movie, ever have a thought of why they don't have enough money to keep the kids mission open in Harlem >I think why aren't I being paid more?
Hell yea Hopper.
Fricking hell the interviewer is an ass. Hooper tries to lighten the mood with that joke and the interviewer keeps pressing. What the frick does he expect hooper to say?
It was, as I recall, though inflation-adjusted, Cleopatra was probably more expensive. And WW deserved to bomb, it's quite bad in many ways, despite the massive practical effects/sea filming etc involved.
The media worked (strangely) very hard at the time to destroy this movie. Muh bloated budget. These gaylord corporate 90's critics need a fricking time machine to the present.
(it would be nice to know why the media at large wanted to destroy this flick)
>google Kevin Costner from worst to best >Waterworld at the end of the list >Main argument is >muh budget
Seriously what the frick? 2 years later came Titanic with a larger budget
Titanic had terrible pre-release press, mostly due to the huge budget. It was rumored as a potential Waterworld style disaster for weeks up until it actually released ("who's going to see a movie where everyone already knows the ending of the story?"). It did well upon release but actually did much better in the weekends following as word of mouth grew for it and kept on doing great business for a year or so in theaters
it's literally just framing anon. you shoot somewhere that's deep enough and you point the camera towards the horizon. the most basic concept of film making.
Waterworld is pretty great. And so is The Postman.
If The Postman was Costner's postapocalyptic western then Waterworld was his postapocalyptic pirate movie. And I think I read somewhere Costner was really into old Hollywood pirate movies. That's why he wore pirate pants instead of tights in Robin Hood too.
>This movie shouldn't be technically possible in 1995
they barely did, the fricked up production being picked up by journos is what maligned the movie's opening and caused it to flop. There's very little wrong with the movie by most standards, except that it really drags in the middle
There's some excessively goofy/hammy shit that really holds it back like the the final scene with the deacons death. The films at its best when it's gritty and there aren't a frick load of screaming women and zaney characters on screen
I watched this film after listenting to the its SNES licensed game's soundtrack, and I honestly really enjoyed it. Really creative, great spectacles and Dennis Hopper kills it.
I rewatched it about a year ago and shut it off. How little kevin costners character reacted to the death of his only friend in the world bothered me, even if it was just a moronic donkey.
>Why did people hate on it so much?
I guess that just sometimes happens, that a movie doesn't get due recognition.
Here's what it went up against (including "the other" Costner-kino):
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/month/july/1995/
Most of these movies are terrible, IMHO. At least Waterworld has some charm to it.
>Kevin Costner said he's very fond of the film: "It stands up as a really exotic, cool movie. I mean, it was flawed — for sure. But, overall, it's a very inventive, cool movie. It's pretty robust."[34]
It was made by an advanced race called the tatarians before the mud flood, they also built all of "our" gothic and baroque style buildings. do your research
They just went somewhere with water and did it.
The practical effects for his boat was the boat actually being able to do that. That's how boats work and veteran sailors are amazing to watch in action. It's also why people had to be press ganged historically, a lot of people fricking died doing that shit.
That boat was so fricking awesome. It's the true main character.
They weren't like today's producers and prioritized actual practical effects. Zoomers nowadays are really bad at distinguishing what's real from what isn't because of years of CGI. And some of the CGI in today's movies are really bad, it's just that your average Zoomer has no baseline in the form of practical effects to understand why it sucks.
Huh, that actually makes a lot of sense. I was born at the tail end of practical effects in movies ('92) but I can't stand gratuitous CGI in films because it looks super fake. Particularly in the movement, CGI lacks weight and just looks wrong to me, to the point where any mostly CGI film is automatically shit to me. I can't even watch MCU stuff, moronic plots aside.
It makes sense that zoomers born after practical effects wouldn't understand why it looks fake as frick because they have nothing to compare it to.
Old movies still exist, do zoomers not watch anything from before they were born? I was born in the 90s and a lot of my favourite movies growing up were from the 70s/80s.
Zoomies can't even pay attention to a 20 second clip from tiktoc, how do you expect them to sit through a 2 hour slow paced film from 20 years ago?
Zoomer hell is probably just watching spaghetti westerns and noir detective films for eternity.
>Zoomer hell is probably just watching spaghetti westerns and noir detective films for eternity
that's my heaven, am I the Anti-Zoomer?
>Old movies still exist, do zoomers not watch anything from before they were born?
most of them in fact do not. there is very little cultural understanding among zoomers in general from before they were born. movies, music, vidya games etc from the 90s and before are scary to zoomzooms.
You act like 1995 was ancient times. It wasn't that long ago.
we are as further from 1995 than 1995 was to moon landing
>This movie shouldn't be technically possible in 1995
years since i've seen it but i don't recall anything standing out as technically groundbreaking, didn't the just shoot in massive pools?
bruhhhhhhhh
we never went to the moon you dolt
Oh yeah? Then how did the secret moon bases on the dark side of the moon get there?
>sent from a device derived from technology developed for the moon landing
i had some doubts but recent Chinese moon satelite actually checked on places where NASA claimed to land, Lunar Rover with tracks are literally visible on the pictures.
Thats just so the Chinese can get their debt repayments. They've got us by the balls.
>t.
How do you explain the nazi (nasa) moon bases
By that logic that should've been easily feasible in 95 because we went to the fricking moon.
Sure but technology doesn't just advance linearly. It has sudden bursts in advancement in different areas at different times. Aside from cgi, not a lot has really changed in the technogy we have to make a film with practical effects.
anon 1995 it was 27 years ago
I'm 22. Frick. I feel like old already.
wtf is this hysterical early age crisis boy gays go thru
30-40 is fkn prime time for men
shut the frick up moron
I'm 31. Enjoy your prime years
Aye brother. I'm 32, and the 20's were the years, i'll tell ya that much
Take it from me. The older you get the faster your perception of time becomes. 27 years feels like an eternity when you're young but when you're older 20 years passes like nothing. I remeber 1995 like it was yesterday. Technologically the world wasn't that different. Everything has just been small incremental improvements on technology that already existed in the 90s.
I turned 33 recently and I can swear this shit becomes exponentially worse after you're like 25 or so. Truly terrifying.
you must be a normie.
the last 5 years of my life seemed like 20 to me, with all the problems and world crisis and all the general frickery
>normie
>on 4chin
Bruh
Nobody is really 'normie' here. No real normie will tolerate this site, especially now that it has lost its last bits of humanity.
Believe me buddy, it was much less "humane" earlier. Normies just can't wrap their minds around why anyone would anonymously post, or why they'd see Black person alot.
Exactly, it was so much worse back in the earlier days when the site received less attention.
>N-No dude! You don't get it! 1995 was good because I was born back then! Now I'm a social reject so I think current year is bad!
why do zoomers seethe so hard like this when people discuss the past, dont remember millenials being like this during the 2005-2010 80s nostalgia era
Man, i'm from the 90's. I get what you mean, but it kinda is. We're getting old, mah boi.
Why do I feel like we are all 30~31? It feels like we are all stuck in here and there are no new kids coming.
I unironically love this movie
Same. Its kino the likes of which we will never see again.
it's a recently rediscovered favourite of mine. hadn't seen it for YEARS and when i caught part of it i still had it basically memorized
I dont really have an excuse for why i haven't watched this movie yet. Been around for long enough ffs. Maybe ill sit down today and see what the hype is about. This isnt just a meme movie is it? Background movie or full attention?
>This isnt just a meme movie is it?
it is
>Background movie or full attention?
moron
Why did you even bother to reply to that. moron lol.
>I was pretending to be moronic, that makes YOU the moron! MUAHAHA
fricking zoomers I swear
what hype, imbecile? everyone talks shit about this movie, it's not good and tanked costner' career
it's a meme cause it was a catastrophic cluster frick and massive money sink. When you watch it just remember that the entire floating city thing they had to build two of, because the first one sunk. Movie ain't bad though
Not everything is a fricking meme. Jesus Christ.
The film is not that bad. It is of middling quality, with an interesting premise and some fun set pieces. Much like 12 Monkeys, it is a somewhat mediocre film with big name actors and interesting moments we get to peer into remnants of disaster from the future. I would recommend giving it a watch.
>Background movie
Bro it's your first watch, I know I'm being meme'd right now but god damn just watch it.
t.held it off till last year, and I thought it was pretty good
I like dystopian movies though.
a lot of fricking money
only because the entire set with all the money sunk kek
The practical and digital effect technology required to make this movie didn’t exist in 1995. It was actually easier to flood the Earth than to fake it.
Is this a sequel to westworld
It's actually the sequel to Wayne's World
And the prequel to The Lost World
no
the sequel to westworld is jurassic park, 20 years later
Based Costner saved the movie. Invested 22 million dollars into it, which is the cost of the set you see on the poster and took over directing after Reynolds got butthurt and walked out. All while going through a bitter divorce.
AAHHHHH I CAN'T TURN
kevin costner has never made a bad film
I saw OPEN RANGE and it is fantastic
the paper guy in waterworld dies again
>kevin costner has never made a bad film
thats right, he's made many
HOW MUCH FOR THE WEE ONE
I alwasy thought he was Robin Williams when I was younger
A rather peculiar role for Robin Williams
>the paper guy in waterworld dies again
that's kim fricking coates you uncultured swine. he was like david morse or tom sizemore in the 90s. in fricking everything.
>Those cheesy 90's explosions
Fricking kino
On the one hand yes, on the other hand 27 years is the time most of our parents had us, so it kinda is a long time
Yeah but if ridley Scott could pull off blade rubber in the late 70s early 80s when they filmed it, waterworld isn't that technically challenging for 1995. It was all practical effects and a huge barge in the the sea.
>blade rubber
fun fact the movie is no longer a bomb, but with the theme water park, the re-releases and Ulysses cut turned green
MUTANTBROS...
It would be cool if someone tried to give it another shot in the form of a show on Netflix or Amazon Prime. The basic premise is kino af.
they're actually doing that
but you just know they're gonna ruin it with global warming, climate change and feminism propaganda like they did with furyroad
I'm hoping that we're at the tail end of the woke trend and we can get non pozzed kino in the coming years.
I thought that 5 years ago, things have only gotten worse, just look at the new lotr
waterworld as a concept does have lots of potential, but without kevin costner to steer, I'm not interested
It would make for a fantastic open world video game
Right? It had great potential for vydia
As long as Blackrock and ESG scores exist that will never, ever happen.
Most don’t realize how bad this trajectory is and there’s not many options out of this ride into hell. We will need a dictator to crawl out of this. It’s inevitable.
I remember watching a scene where Kevin Costner's character was offered some asian dicky to impregnate but he refused because he didnt want to pass on his mutant genes. Watched it again a few years back and that scene wasnt there. Was this really in the movie or am I imagining things??
you are imagining things
but he does turn down a pussycat for reasons
I can't remember that, they do bring up the little daughter that Costner could use as a sex slave but other than that i can't remember that.
I remember that too.
There is a very extended cut of Waterworld, forgot what it's called, though I don't even think it was in that. I just watched it to death on standard VHS edition as a kid.
The Ulysses cut.
That's the one, thanks
It was there, close to the beginning when he's on the floating fortress.
Where did you watch it? I do have the feeling streaming centers change the movie. I have my brother's netflix account and movies are always quicker or certain scenes end sooner or something...
Torrent+
That scene exist in the Spanish version
The scene literally is there on the netflix movie
yes, that scene is very early in the movie
i can confirm this scene is on netflix when he's at the atoll, not too long before they all turn on him
Yes is on the beginning. Because he rejected her that make everyone suspicious and find out he was a mutant
Just watched this a week ago on prime. It's when he's trying to leave the first town.
It reminded me a lot of One Piece. Sometimes I wonder if Oda got some inspiration from this movie for the manga.
>tfw waterworld/global ocean is my favourite setting in any media
>tfw almost no content to cater to it
Yes I know about Gargantia, why is there so little media for the most kino setting going?
have you read J.G Ballard's "Drowned World"?
>spanish poster
you're not fooling anyone, puto
Did the primary set (the floating town) sink and they had to build a new one? This film is also why everyone assumed Titanic would be a bomb. Huge water production, way over budget, egomaniac director.
their entire set (with most of the money sunk) and they remade the movie with scraps and next to nothing
thats why there's no 'town' fortress nothing, just an atoll and a tanker
VGH WHAT COVLD HAVE BEEEN
y-yeah
.......We could have had kino live action One Piece bros.......
It's not fair........
bs the atoll was the largest set piece
The set was built right next to a dock and they just bluescreened everything.
Why not dumbass
>maybe he doesn't answer to Chuck, call him Charles
>hey Charles!
>maybe he doesn't answer to Chuck, call him Sneed.
>Hey Sneed!
It is considered a "box office bomb," despite selling a lot of tickets, but the budget was too out of control. I believe one set even burned down or sunk or something. Great movie especially the Ulysses Cut
not any more
like how irl he became friends with the guy he kills in the movie
>Sees pic
Yeah.....totally........"friends".......
Is this kino worth a watch?
>Costnerkino
can't go wrong with it
Good movie
i will literally NEVER watch this flick. costner was the the rock of the 90s, he was in all sorts of shit after shit after shit
autism
good, you don't deserve the level of comfiness Waterworld offers
Overrated by Cinemaphile edgelords. Bad script, story, villain and casting. I give Costner credit for the huge effort, but its pretty meh
weak bait
being contrarian does not make you interesting
I think it's a shit movie, do you expect everyone to like every movie you like? Are you that afraid of other people's opinions?
>Overrated by Cinemaphile edgelords
>I think
kek
That was a different poster dumbass. More than one person hates your favorite movie, go cry now.
Almost everyone agrees that The Postman was shit and The Postman is just Costner remaking Waterworld on dry land. There's a reason why his career dried up and it's because these films just didn't spark much interest. It's contrarian/revisionist to say Waterworld is a beloved classic when twenty years ago no one would have counted it among the best films of the nineties. You can look at contemporary reviews for proof too.
My favorite dieselpunk kino
Maybe its me, but for me this movie was like Mad Max on water. Replace fuel with water and desert with the sea. Even the little kid getting a present was from Mad Max.
>Jack Nicholson, Gary Oldman, Gary Busey, Samuel L. Jackson, Laurence Fishburne, Gene Hackman and James Caan all refused the role of The Deacon
Damn, if Dennis Hopper wasn't available they would probably never cast this role.
>They spend all this money on this movie, ever have a thought of why they don't have enough money to keep the kids mission open in Harlem
>I think why aren't I being paid more?
Hell yea Hopper.
Fricking hell the interviewer is an ass. Hooper tries to lighten the mood with that joke and the interviewer keeps pressing. What the frick does he expect hooper to say?
>Dennis Hopper
i miss that lil homie like you wouldn't believe
Wasnt this the most expensive movie made at the time when it came out?
Couldve sworn i remember them saying that when it bombed.
It was, as I recall, though inflation-adjusted, Cleopatra was probably more expensive. And WW deserved to bomb, it's quite bad in many ways, despite the massive practical effects/sea filming etc involved.
I don’t know how they did it bros
Cost a fortune
The media worked (strangely) very hard at the time to destroy this movie. Muh bloated budget. These gaylord corporate 90's critics need a fricking time machine to the present.
(it would be nice to know why the media at large wanted to destroy this flick)
Jews are mildly allergic to water
The "long ass Costner movie" trend of the 90's
Critics were sick of him and tried to take him down.
"We had access to too much money, too much equipment, and little by little, we went insane."
- Kevin Reynolds.
It's comfy kino
People hated thjs movie because of Costner
People were starting to get sick of the badass blonde white male archetype
>google Kevin Costner from worst to best
>Waterworld at the end of the list
>Main argument is >muh budget
Seriously what the frick? 2 years later came Titanic with a larger budget
Titanic had terrible pre-release press, mostly due to the huge budget. It was rumored as a potential Waterworld style disaster for weeks up until it actually released ("who's going to see a movie where everyone already knows the ending of the story?"). It did well upon release but actually did much better in the weekends following as word of mouth grew for it and kept on doing great business for a year or so in theaters
it's literally just framing anon. you shoot somewhere that's deep enough and you point the camera towards the horizon. the most basic concept of film making.
Waterworld is pretty great. And so is The Postman.
If The Postman was Costner's postapocalyptic western then Waterworld was his postapocalyptic pirate movie. And I think I read somewhere Costner was really into old Hollywood pirate movies. That's why he wore pirate pants instead of tights in Robin Hood too.
>the bad guys are bad because they smoke
>call em smokers
>It shouldn’t have been possible for Kevin Costner to drive a jet ski in a pool while shooting blanks out of a fake gun at Dennis Hopper!
how did they do it? even modern humans can't replicate such a feat
Any movie that opens with Kevin Costner drinking his own piss is 10/10 in my book.
71% of the planet is water dumbass, there's more water than ground to film on
>shouldn't be technically possible
I think you need to explain why.
>This movie shouldn't be technically possible in 1995
they barely did, the fricked up production being picked up by journos is what maligned the movie's opening and caused it to flop. There's very little wrong with the movie by most standards, except that it really drags in the middle
There's some excessively goofy/hammy shit that really holds it back like the the final scene with the deacons death. The films at its best when it's gritty and there aren't a frick load of screaming women and zaney characters on screen
by going grossly over budget which somehow turned into negative press
how much for the wee one
White ingenuity is a incredible thing
I watched this film after listenting to the its SNES licensed game's soundtrack, and I honestly really enjoyed it. Really creative, great spectacles and Dennis Hopper kills it.
That soundtrack is fricking incredible. It's absurd how good it is considering how much the game sucks.
I like you more.
This is the donkey from the Postman. He get's eaten in the second act but really is the best part of the film.
I rewatched that recently and bill's death still made me sad.
I rewatched it about a year ago and shut it off. How little kevin costners character reacted to the death of his only friend in the world bothered me, even if it was just a moronic donkey.
its only a model....
>find a 195 reply thread about waterworld
its my lucky day
costner was great in silverado
Lots of money. Wasn't it the most expensive movie ever made at that point?
>that boat transformation scene
>that sail spinning mechanism
I used to love that movie. Why did people hate on it so much? I always thought it was amazing how they filmed all of that back then.
>Why did people hate on it so much?
I guess that just sometimes happens, that a movie doesn't get due recognition.
Here's what it went up against (including "the other" Costner-kino):
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/month/july/1995/
Most of these movies are terrible, IMHO. At least Waterworld has some charm to it.
Æ S T H E T I
Wikipedia says the theme park ride for this movie is STILL running today in 2022
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterworld:_A_Live_Sea_War_Spectacular
its because its one of the best live shows ever. i fricking love it.
Think that Little Hercules kid is a stunt man in that show, of course he's not a kid anymore though.
"it's pretty robust"
>Kevin Costner said he's very fond of the film: "It stands up as a really exotic, cool movie. I mean, it was flawed — for sure. But, overall, it's a very inventive, cool movie. It's pretty robust."[34]
It was made by an advanced race called the tatarians before the mud flood, they also built all of "our" gothic and baroque style buildings. do your research
>zoomers literally too young to remember when they flooded the earth for 4 months to film this movie
ok you guys convinced me
im finally watching waterworld
Just be prepared that it's not a perfect films, some of the acting and script are over the top goofy at times, particularly the very end.
what cut is better? i see there is an ulysses cut
Has anyone here seen Open Range?
did this homie really just ask if we've seen Open Range?