>New Batman movie sucks
>Batwoman flopped and cancelled
>Gotham Knights the show is going to flop
>Gotham Knights the game is probably going to flop
>Batfleck unlikely to come back
>Now the Batgirl fiasco
How do we save The Bat?
This really just isn't his year
its over
I feel bad for men. Harley Quinn is the best Bat-media in a decade, yet they are too insecure to watch it.
get better bait next time, chump
>give this show a try
>filled with garbage leftist """"jokes""""
nah
>le lesbian harley quinn
frick off and die
Frick off troony, the only reason you like it is because it tickles your transbien fetish.
You will die alone and your parents are going to use your dead name on your tombstone.
I don’t watch cartoons
Forgot to mention the comics is making him gay.
Release the Snyder
don’t forget
>batman calzony now a distant memory, never to return
this one hurts the most.
>New Batman movie sucks
filtered
Making Riddle "Le Cinemaphile Incel" just ruined it for me. Hate it when movies hop on trends.
better than making him a raging homosexual like in Batman Forever
>Hate it when movies hop on trends
TDK was literally about the War on Terror and TDKR was about the occupy protests and the increase of anti-capitalist populism after the 2008 financial crash
This. It is literally the best one.
When a character like Batman is in the hands of a company like this, there's only so much you can expect
>written by Matt Bomer
christ and people wanted him to be Nightwing
why is Nightwing such a homophobe? weird that Bruce "The Fascist Knight" Wayne has to break this down for Dick
Going with the Batman grooming Robin angle? Bold choice
Kek, the frick is brave about fricking buttholes in a club?
Oh for fricks sake
Ugh, such ugly art.
It's perfectly fine, though.
Anon, I don't think the art was the problem here.
>licking hairy male buttholes is the same as fighting crime
We need a new plague
>Batman delivering a monologue while jumping around
Cringe
>Rich white guy with unlimited amount of money going around dress as a bat to beat up criminals is totally like us yaaaasss queeeeennnn
>New Batman movie sucks
? Marvelcuck
New film didn't
Batwoman didn't flop it didn't get finished
Others are just bs you spew
>Batwoman didn't flop it didn't get finished
I wonder why.
Film can't flop if it didn't get released
Fricking tard
We're not talking about the Batgirl film, we're talking about pic related which wasn't renewed for a 4th season after poor reviews.
Does anyone unironically watch the CW stuff? On top of the CGI and action being profoundly embarrassing the acting and writing is sub-porn-tier
Looks like something from the early 2000s.
I liked the new movie, but it definitely under performed.
Just bring back Nolan. His movies are the only ones that still hold up, and actually function as movies and not comic book commercials.
I honestly don't understand the love for The Batman. I found it incredibly boring with no real payoff. Slow burn into a slow fizzle.
Nolan doing a Beyond movie would be nice.
I liked Reeves' dialogue more. Felt like a fun noir in terms of tone, which is what Batman should be. Nolan's was poet-homosexualry and had silly ass lines. The performances save the atrocious dialogue.
>Felt like a fun noir in terms of tone,
Speaking in low voices doesn't make good dialogue. "Noir", how many noir movies have you seen homosexual?
Enough to know that juxtaposing harsh shadows with stark, dramatic instances of light and shrouding everything in rain, corruption, and smoke is noirish...
as well as making a movie about detectives solving a mystery who speak hoarsely and monologue using voice over is noirish as well...
have you seen any noirs?
>Enough to know that juxtaposing harsh shadows with stark, dramatic instances of light and shrouding everything in rain, corruption, and smoke is noirish.
Oh man, your idea of noir comes purely from Se7en and Blade Runner. Kek. Notice how you don't mention any thematic elements or characterisations.
By your definition Batman is more of a noir than LA Confidential or The Long Goodbye.
Well, for one, you left out the entire second half of my reply, but whatever.
Corruption is a common thematic element. Waring between good and evil, considering moral and immoral actions, and accepting simple, if hurtful, truths are common elements of characterization in noir.
All of these are present in The Batman. Hell, those are elements in neo-noir as well.
>Waring between good and evil, considering moral and immoral actions.
Oh man, it's so obvious you come from Cinemaphile.
>Oh man! Le CRINGE! It's SOOOO obvious you came from Cinemaphile!!
Keep coping. That's prevalent in every fricking noir story ever told. Name one fricking noir where it isn't.
>That's prevalent in every fricking noir story ever told
Oh, is it present in The Long Goodbye?
Yes dumbass.
Number one, that's a neo-noir, but we'll go with it
Here's the synopsis of it:
>The Long Goodbye has been described as "a study of a moral and decent man cast adrift in a selfish, self-obsessed society where lives can be thrown away without a backward glance ... and any notions of friendship and loyalty are meaningless."
So, we have a story of a morally decent man who is struggling to choose between right and wrong, as he considers moral and immoral decisions before finally giving in, and committing a ruthless act of violence due to corruption in a supposed ally.
Backpedal out of this one moron. Your beloved Long Goodbye was exactly what I said it was the whole time.
kek
imaging wasting this much effort to win a Cinemaphile argument
>imaging
muphrys law
>Number one, that's a neo-noir,
Lel.What do you think Batman is? Classic noir?
>Here's the synopsis.
So you haven't watched the movie? The Long Goodbye isn't about war between good and evil or moral vs immoral. It's about a man(more specifically a protagonist from a classic noir era) being dropped in a morally grey world that he can't quite make sense of and is swept up by the events of the film that he has very little control over.
So you went ahead and read the plot synopsis of The Long Good bye and vomitted out that diarrhea of a comment.
No homosexual. I've seen it, but I didn't want to list out every scene.
It is about good vs evil. He represents a good, morally decent man, the "hero" from classic noir, who is cast into a morally indecent modern world, and he tries to do the right thing but is constantly shit on
He struggles to make the moral choice, but fails when he shoots and kills a man at the end of the film
You can't backpedal out of this and reword the exact meaning of the film to act like you're right
>It is about good vs evil
This is your brain on capeshit.
>but fails when he shoots and kills a man at the end of the film
As anothet anon in this film has said. This isn’t your capeshit. Killing a person isn’t some moral abomination. The morally "good" Marlowe isn’t pushed to do an action that he has a rule against. The entire point is Marlowe gets suckered in because he is out of touch in this world full of moral greyness. If it was good vs evil then he gone after Augustine or even Eileen? You're a literal moron who can't even grasp any comlexity beyond capeshit tier good vs evil plots. Kek.
You forgot to answer the question. Is Batman noir or neo-noir?
It is about good vs evil
>Marlowe is decent, moral, and a good man
>The world is indecent, evil, and cruel
He succumbs to this modern, immoral world, and kills a man just because he said things which made him angry
THAT IS IMMORAL
>YoU CaN'T GrAsP CoMPlExITY!
It isn't complex. It's a simple retool of a classic story interwoven with a busy narrative to seem complicated. The story comes ultimately down to what I said all noir stories are about
>Morality vs immorality
>Tough decisions vs easy ones
>Understanding/recognizing a fact of life
That's all in The Long Goodbye, and neither of you anons have proven otherwise.
Cast all the insults you want, but I'm the superior logic here. I'm using examples from the media you present which coincide with my argument. You are not.
>Why not go after Eileen
Because all she did was have an affair? She hired him, and didn't do anything illegal.
>He succumbs to this modern, immoral world, and kills a man just because he said things which made him angry
He just kills a lying piece of shit moron. He doesn't "succumb" to the immoral world. In your mind killing is immoral because your children's comics said so, kek.
Do you think Philip Marlowe has a no kill rule or something?
> It isn't complex. It's a simple retool of a classic story interwoven with a busy narrative to seem complicated.
Pajeet just because you're too moronic to understand anything beyond comic book morality doesn't mean an Altman film is "pretending to be complicated through a busy narrative".
> neither of you anons have proven otherwise.
I can tell this means a lot to you but you've simply been embarrassed in this argument.
> Because all she did was have an affair? She hired him, and didn't do anything illegal.
She played a role in covering up the murder and setting up an innocent man, moron. I like how you conveniently ignored Augustine, kek. Be honest, did you even watch the movie?
I also like how ignore the question of whether The Batman is noir or neonoir?
Name another person Marlowe kills in the movie.
>B-b-b-b-but it's Altma-
I don't care. Even Orson Welles made bad movies. Nothing is sacred just because you like it.
>You've SIMPLY been embarrased!
Augustine wanted his money. He got it. He threatened Marlowe, but people threaten each other here all the time, and don't get arrested.
>She covered up a murder!
Sure, let's say that she knew who the real murderer was, which the movie never explicitly states so you can have a fricking win for once.
>But The Batman-
It's classic noir. It doesn't have to take place in the forties or have come out in the forties to be characterized as a classic.
>Name another person Marlowe kills in the movie
Do you know who Philip Marlowe is as a character? He's a private eye. Do you know the history of the character?
> Augustine wanted his money. He got it. He threatened Marlowe,
Jesus Christ. You may as well admit you didn't watch the movie. Augustine is a gangster who in his first meeting with Marlowe bashes his girlfriend's face in and threatens to do far far worse to Marlowe.
> Sure, let's say that she knew who the real murderer was,
She does. You literal utter dumbfrick. Who else is it going to be? Do you even know who the victim was? Go read the plot synopsis again.
> It's classic noir.
Thanks for confirming you're in fact a moron. Kek. Batman if we are being generous is a neo-noir. It's not noir. Kek.
>muh history
So he didn't kill another character in the movie. Got it.
>his girlfriend
She was a mistress. And Marlowe isn't a cop. He can't arrest people. Like I said, he struggles with moral and immoral choices. We went over the threat thing, that was pointless to bring back up.
>She does-
Don't remember the movie saying it. Wade didn't kill Sylvia, Terry did. But they never confirm Eileen knew it.
>Thanks for confirming-
Boring. It's more of a noir than Long Goodbye is. In terms of style and themes.
Yes. That's what I said. They both are, but only one has a double function, which makes it more subtle.
Cretins like you are hilarious. Regular reminder that morons walk among us.
THREAD REMINDER:
Three people have yet to prove me wrong. Should I continue to embarrass them, or will they stop on their own?
see
Chuds in the thread assumed I said he didn't have a no-kill rule. I never said that. I asked, "Who else did he kill in the movie?"
Grow up child.
I read the whole exchange. You want to act as if Marlowe killing Lennox is a proof of him being corrupted but that implicitly assumes Marlowe is against killing in the first place.
>which makes it more subtle.
Nothing about The Batman is fricking subtle.
It's more subtle than Nolanshit
Prove me wrong or leave
No, it fricking isn't. Christopher Nolan in the very least never had the character using the movie thematic message as a fricking nickname. That was just too fricking on the nose and cringe. When i heard that Batman was calling himself "Vengeance" and people unironically acknowledge that as an unofficial nickname i couldn't believe it due to how hacky it was. The ending with the goon repeating the same line was predictable as frick because of it. I knew that the Riddler or someone would eventually say that shit back to Batman.
Welp, you didn't prove me wrong. You gave a subjective opinion.
I gave proof. Reeves used thematic statement as a double function. Nolan did not.
You can leave now.
I'm not the one arguing with you throughout the thread. Just throwing my two cents, you autistic frick.
You seem pretty upset for someone with, ostensibly, no skin in the game.
Thor 4 made less money than battinson despite costing more and batman being a three hour long reboot released when half of Asia was in full lockdown, they have a really good reason to be nervous anon
What about Multiverse of Madness and NWH grossing more "anons"?
NWH had all the Raimi characters coming back and MoM introduced the X-Men and Fantastic Four, those were crossover events riding on the popularity of previous movies from other companies. The Batman made more than Thor 4 because it was the better movie, simple as that
So what will your cope be when Wakanda forever outgrosses Batman?
You guys were sure Thor 4 was going to outgross Batman too and then it made less than Suicide Squad in 2016, I don't know if I should trust you disney PR people again
Well Marvel is 2/3 against The Batman. I mean the first one made 700 million domestically alone. Only around 70 million less that your favourite capeshit made WW. Kek.
>Well Marvel is 2/3 against The Batman
Yeah but just crossover events, let's see if public schools subsidize the new black panther like they did with the first one
>Only around 70 million less that your favourite capeshit made WW
So more than Thor 4 then, oof not looking great!
You're not really fooling anyone at this point disneytroon you've been shilling Prey non stop all week
>So more than Thor 4 then, oof not looking great!
Yep and it's exactly why you'll be in tears when it comes out.
>in tears
But you said "we" would be in tears after Thor 4 and there was only laughter. Don't get me wrong disneyanon, I just want good capeshit and The Batman was good enough, I gave up on marvel after Endgame was so abysmally bad. DC made the best capeshit of all time and won a golden lion with it just in 2019, there's some hope there
Prey was garbage and Thor 4 flopped anon, no need to blogpost anymore the facts are out there
>But you said "we"
Not everyone is a console warring manchild anon. What kind of rope will you use to have a nice day when Wakanda Forever outgrosses this piece of crap. How will you cope when Avatar and Top Gun sweep up technical awards that the midman could've gotten?
I won't give a crap about any of that shit, I'm not the disney viral marketer making seething threads like this when a rival movie mogs one of our flagships. If they're good (they won't be) I'd be glad and if they're trash (they will be) I'd be here laughing at you, same as always
>I'd be here laughing at you, same as always
Do it without tears next time.
Nu-DC is for black people only.
>Prey was garbage and Thor 4 flopped anon, no need to blogpost anymore the facts are out there
I'm not defending Thor 4 or Prey. From what I've seen they look like trash too. But I'm actually a fan of Batman so it's more disappointing to see it go in such a shitty direction. I knew those other movies would suck.
>You're not really fooling anyone at this point disneytroon you've been shilling Prey non stop all week
>Everyone on the Internet who says things I don't like is the same person and they all work for a competing company
Hate to break it to you, but you're the one acting like a marketer here. Just accept that some people won't like the product and move on.
>Anyone who criticizes my product is (competing company marketer). It's impossible for anyone to sincerely dislike it
People here have seen this a million times before. It's not going to convince anyone.
>So he didn't kill another character in the movie. Got it.
So you have no evidence that he is against killing scum or has a no kill rule. Go it. You have no idea of the character itself. Kek
> And Marlowe isn't a cop. He can't arrest people.
Hey, moron. Did you forget that you wanted to argue that this is a good vs evil story? Him not being a cop didn't stop him from killing Lennox. You didn't go over the "threat" you conveniently forgot he's a gangster who bashes his lover's face in. That's not something that happens all the time dumbfrick.
> Don't remember the movie saying it. Wade didn't kill Sylvia, Terry did.
You literally don't remember a single plot point in the movie do you? Oh wait. You didn't even watch it.
> It's more of a noir than Long Goodbye is.
No it's not. It's just capeshit.
>Philip Marlowe has a no kill rule
>Augustine just threatened Marlowe
>Eileen didn't know who the killer was
Giga keking. If there was any doubt that you just furiously googled the plot synopsis of the long goodbye, you just quelled them entirely.
>committing a ruthless act of violence
Hey pajeet. Philip Marlowe isn't Batman. He has no rule against killing. Him killing his friend towards the end isn't him crossing some moral line.
kid, you're not gonna convince them
homosexuals here contradict shit because they're desperate to win
they fricking lost in life, and this is all they have
just say okay, know you're right, and move the frick on
Jesus fricking christ. have a nice day you dumb c**t. It actually disgusts me when capeshit manchildren latch on other genres in order appear sophisticated.
THEN PROVE TO ME I'M WRONG
You homosexuals talk big game, but you never step up to the bat
It's all drivel with you
If I'm wrong, PROVE IT
I don’t think we have to settle disputes by telling one to commit suicide.
Muh noir is literally unwatchable. No one cared about Sin City, let's try actually making a movie like Nolan did.
With Joseph Gordon-Levitt? Could work.
Great, another lisping b***h in the cowl
Bale's mouth was so fricking distracting, in TDK and Begins, moreso in Begins
I don't know how everybody didn't immediately know it was Bruce Wayne, that fricking mouth is unmistakable
nah I'd just write him out, he's too small to take the mantle. It's Batman not Batmanlet. "Robin died on his first night out as Batman". There, done deal. They can just introduce a new actor as Terry
Terry himself was a manlet. I wouldn't want a giant timeskip though, as Bale Batman could return. Nolan did leave the potential for it in TDKR.
Terry wasn't a manlet, he was a teenager. He grew to be a hulking man in the end just like his dad, ugh
JGL meanwhile is a full grown adult in TDKR
TDKR ending is really just meant to be a nice bookend; if anything it's more symbolic of how people in Gotham would be inspired by Batman to look after the city themselves. You're not actually supposed to think about the logistics of how some random adult beat cop with no friends/family/support is supposed to literally be Batman and do Batman stuff going forward.
I think another Batkeaton movie with Burton actually on helm would do good today, and they could just pick a popular early 90s actor for Riddler.
no more fricking nolan
only tdk was good, and the sheer fricking comic inaccuracy nearly tanked the quality of all three films
plus, begins is repetitive bullshit
>I wanna be more than a man
>You have to become more than just a man
>In order to be more than merely a man
>As a man I can be-
>As a symbol instead of just a man
holy shit frick off
none of the other batman movies are as good as the nolan films, they're all schwarbage
Here we see a pajeet being baffled by dramatic repetition.
Here we see a Nolanshill insisting that boring repetition isn't handholding, and is dramatic
Here we see a pajeet seething about basic literary devices.
Handholding is a basic literary device?
Maybe stop reading children's literature
Dramatic repetition pajeet. Handholding would be having your main character's nick name be Mr Vengeance.
>comic inaccuracy nearly tanked the quality of all three films
No, it didn't. The reason Nolan movies worked is because they were movies first and comic book adaptations second.
TDK was the only actual good movie out of the trilogy
>the sheer fricking comic inaccuracy
What is that even supposed to mean?
It means I've been waiting for decades for a comic accurate Batman movie, and I finally got it this year.
What the frick is "comic accuracy"?
Something that stays true to the character from the comics. Nolan got the basics right, but that wasn't enough to save the botched characterization
>handholding would be having your main character's nickname be a joke version of the name he outwardly calls himself
How?
>Handholding is when a character repeats a word once and again under a different circumstance as a pay off
How?
Here's the difference moron
>Nolan used "more than a man" to constantly remind the audience what the theme of the movie is, and what Bruce was doing in all of these places
Whereas
>Reeves used "Mr. Vengeance" to remind us what this version of Batman was in his psyche, and how silly his tactic of revenge was in the long run
Reeves = Subtle
Nolan = Unsubtle
used "more than a man" to constantly remind the audience what the theme of the movie is, and what Bruce was doing in all of these places
Nope as build up and pay off. See I can be reductive to shit on your shite movie too.
>Reeves has Barman be nicknamed Vengeance to remind us this movie is about Vengeance.
I know you're desperate to show that your garbage movie is better than Nolan's efforts and in that vein you pretend that basic dramatic repetition(which has been done since fricking Shakespeare)is hand holding. I'm giving you the response that you deserve.
It's hand holding when it's used over and over and over in the movie to illustrate a simple fricking point which the audience understood
Yeah, it was subtle. Because it had only been used once at the beginning of the film, and Mr. Vengeance was used by Penguin both times to demean Batman and had nothing to do with the thematic relevance
>Because it had only been used once at the beginning of the film, and Mr. Vengeance was used by Penguin both times to demean Batman and had nothing to do with the thematic relevance
You forgot it being used by Catwoman and the Riddler Goon to describe himself. Lmao. So basically handholding.
He referenced Mr. Vengeance specifically moron. I was responding to that
Catwoman didn't call him Mr. Vengeance, nor did the goon
Plus, that's his fricking name that he advertises. That's what he's known as on the streets, so that's what Catwoman and the goon called him
Bruce in Begins wasn't known as "More than just a man" you moron
That was Nolan handholding so he could shove the theme of the film down our throats
>Catwoman didn't call him Mr. Vengeance,
Come on Vengeance.
> nor did the goon
Read what I wrote pajeet.
>Riddler Goon to describe himself.
Why does Matt Reeves keep mentioning vengeance? Is he handholding you?
"Come on vengeance" ISN'T "Mr. Vengeance" you insolent swine, learn basic fricking logic before typing.
>Why does Matt Reeves keep mentioning ven-
BECAUSE IT'S WHAT BATMAN CALLS HIMSELF. IT'S THE SAME AS ME CALLING YOU BY YOUR FRICKING NAME SHITHEEL.
YES YOU DID BY COMPARING IT TO VENGEANCE, WHICH BATMAN STATES AS WHAT HE IS TO BE CALLED BY
"I'm Vengeance."
THAT IS HIM ILLUSTRATING WHO HE IS, AND PEOPLE TAKE IT AS SUCH. IT WORKS BOTH THEMATICALLY AND LOGICALLY, WHEREAS NOLAN'S SHIT ONLY HANDHOLDS FOR THEMATIC PURPOSE, WHICH MAKES IT UNSUTBLE
guys please stop being moronic, you're driving this random anon insane
>"Come on vengeance" ISN'T "Mr. Vengeance" you insolent swine, learn basic fricking logic before typing.
Are you trying to argue that the situation is completely different because one added mr before it? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Are you legit moronic? Do you have Downs Syndrome? Batman is still being referred to as Vengeance moron.
I can't believe you two are this mentally deficient. It's insane. You people are out in the world. That's fricking scary.
How is it the same? One is being used as a name, the other is used as a mission statement?
How do you become this moronic to not mentally understand and recognize the difference?
>One is being used as a name, the other is used as a mission statement?
Both are used to reinforce the movie's thematic elements pajeet. Do you know the reason why Reeves had Batman call himself vengeance (along with other characters) and why he had a Riddler goon describe himself the same? Go ahead. It's tied to the movie's themes. Cretins like you are hilarious. Regular reminder why comicbook morons shouldn't be taken seriously.
>YES YOU DID BY COMPARING IT TO VENGEANCE, WHICH BATMAN STATES AS WHAT HE IS TO BE CALLED BY
What the frick is wrong with this pajeet? Lmao. Reeves is handholding by using it as a nickname for Bats while Nolan is handholding through exchanges? In both instances a certain thematic element is reinforced through dialogue. Just because one is a name and another is an exchange doesn’t change their function.
>"Come on vengeance" ISN'T "Mr. Vengeance" you insolent swine, learn basic fricking logic before typing.
Holy kek. Behold the genius the Battinsongays.
>Bruce in Begins wasn't known as "More than just a man" you moron
Nobody said he was.
>It's hand holding when it's used over and over
It isn't moron. The specific instance is used exactly thrice. Far less than Vengeance.
>Yeah, it was subtle.
You literally have Batman over explaining shit about vengeance and scars as if he was giving a TED talk at the end. The cringest ending monologue to a movie i have ever seen.
Like TDK's isn't cringier?
>I can be bad even tho I actually good!
>NOOOOO PLZ DON'T!
>I must! Becuz Joker won, and that can't happen!
Please...
Holy shit, you've no understanding of anything more complex than "Mr Vengeance" tier info dump.
TDK is a story about being a symbol, whatever it may be, to a city that Batman has dedicated his life to servicing. He begins the film believing he has no limits, but he searches for a maskless man to take his place, someone that the public can truly get behind, and lawfully so.
But as Joker permeates his way into the city, and causes panic and disruption, Batman has to consider what his vigilantism has actually caused, and whether or not his vision for Gotham is actually within reach.
At the end of the film, Joker has corrupted the one man Batman thought could take his place, and after he is defeated, Batman decides that his limit must always be overcome, even if it means sacrificing his own image to accomplish it.
He learns that he can be whatever he has to be in the name of protection, which ultimately has consequences later.
I get it you mutt. It's just written poorly. Copy and paste it to check if I copied it. That shit all came from here. Because anyone can understand TDK.
>Reeves = Subtle
I really liked the subtelty when one of Riddler's acolytes said "I'm Vengeance" because after all the similarities between him and The Riddler hasn't been hammered home multiple times in an extremely unsubtle way throughout the movie.
>Something that stays true to the character from the comics
Who the frick reads comics? It's a dead medium.
>comic inaccuracy
that's the only way to save these films
comics fricking suck and are a medium for absolute bottom of the barrel morons
even pro wrestling is a higher iq medium than comics
Blame the writers not the source material; comics can be works of art, it’s the writers that sink it to terrible, confounding lows.
After Oppenheimer Nolan is slated to make.
>Akira
>Bond
>a Fast and the furious spinoff
Why should he do capeshit?
>>Bond
>>a Fast and the furious spinoff
These are essentially capeshit.
Nolan is never coming back. He didn't even want to do TDKR
Rises was shit but I genuinely believe that was because the role of Bane was originally meant to be Joker.
>His movies are the only ones that still hold up, and actually function as movies and not comic book commercials.
Filtered, 89 and Returns are kino and will always hold up
cringe
>How do we save The Bat?
Stop making movies about him.
The new movie is unironically propaganda. I hope the series dies, but deep down I know they'll keep doubling down even if the movies flop harder each time.
>The new movie is unironically propaganda.
Literally how?
>Multiracial gang led by white man tried to force innocent black guy to knockout Asian. Black guy is the only one who is reluctant and has a conscience. This is essentially altering the audience's perception of real world events
>Every white politician is corrupt, black female mayoral candidate and black Gordon are sole exception to the rampant corruption among authority figures in government
>In case it wasn't obvious enough, Catwoman acts as a mouthpiece for the writer and explicitly states the movie's "white privilege" message
>Bad guys are portrayed as a militia that posts on an online board like Cinemaphile. They carry out a terrorist attack against civilians to create an association between anti-establishment types and "extremism".
It's pretty heavy handed.
How many times have we seen Bruce's parents get killed on screen? In film? On Gotham AND Titans? And in every Arkham game for some reason.
DC used Batman like a filthy prostitute while DCgays lapped it up. But now real people don't give AF about Batman anymore. You did this to yourselves!
Remember that.
Not nearly enough times. In fact, they should die several times throughout The Flash.
>How many times have we seen Bruce's parents get killed on screen? In film? On Gotham AND Titans? And in every Arkham game for some reason.
>DC used Batman like a filthy prostitute while DCgays lapped it up. But now real people don't give AF about Batman anymore. You did this to yourselves!
>Remember that.
>DC used Batman like a filthy prostitute while DCgays lapped it up.
That's because he's their only good property. There's a reason half the cast of the Injustice games are all Batman characters.
The character is also a creative drain. Batman editorial often takes scripts intended for Nightwing, Red Hood, etc and just rewrite Batman over it.
It makes me sad knowing that they'll skip IJ3.
flopped and cancelled
Should've stuck with Kate and immediately recast with Wallis.
Save the bat?
No, we kill the bat.
I thought Affleck took a bunch of money to remain as Batman for a little while longer.
Threadly reminder.
Threadly reminder that the photos are taken at an angle which isn't concurrent to the fifth floor window Riddler operated from, which confirms that he in fact did not take the photos from his window, and took them from a lower location.
This has been debunked countless times.
Gotham Knights is going to be fun i think. The game.
don't worry, the new bamham game will have plenty of soul and not just be a cash grab
I swear it's amazing how hard the Arkham games mog this piece of junk. Arkham Knight is probably the most gorgeous game I've ever seen while Gotham Knights looks like something from the early PS3, despite being on the new console.
KINO
>Arkham Knight is probably the most gorgeous game I've ever seen
It's a shame the gameplay is kinda shite
They robbed us of a decent Deathstoke fight. Atleast Mr. Freeze and Croc dlc's are fun.
He's sick in Multiversus though.
>New Batman movie sucks
have faith, a new era is coming
Don a costume and start dishing out vigilante justice?
>How do we save The Bat?
Just basically remake Third Watch but make it set in Gotham City, without making the cops deal with Batman's actual rogue's gallery or seeing Batman in action all the time.
Just read Gotham Central.
>Batfleck unlikely to come back
>He's literally come back and done additional photography for Aquaman 2 and now the Flash to keep him as the full time DCEU Batman
Ben Affleck solo movie announcement soon!
Soon
>New Batman movie sucks
Battinson was pretty good though, easily the best capeshit since Joker in 2019, another batman related IP
truth is spoken
Battinson saying "I'm vengeance" is cooler than anything in the Nolan movies. Cope by whatever means necessary.
Just passing through to remind everyone that BATMAN V SUPERMAN remains the more complex and subtle Batman film with an actual mature plotline and character arc.
Batman had its golden age years ago, its time to move on. They obviously cant keep it up forever, how could they? If you ask me, you either die a hero or live long enough to fade into obscurity.
I am so over batman its unreal
>New Batman movie sucks
Wrong
>be DC
>have decent comic universe to adapt
>first to introduce crossovers and multiverse
>have best animated adaptation which have crossovers and build up for bigger universe
>have best capeshit game with great 10/10 Batman
>can't adapt Batman on big screen after Nolan's "grounded non-capeshit version"
>can't adapt bigger connected univese with crossovers
How? DCAU is there as example how to adapt universe on screen.
Batman Arkhamverse is there as example how to adapt modern Batman and make him cool
DC needs to forget live action and focus on animated movies with the TAS/Arkhamverse games voice cast.
>TAS/Arkhamverse
God just let Kevin Conroy go. It's over, anon.
No.
He is coming back just the same as Cavill
I only like Superman. Old cartoons where kino. Don't really care about batman unless he isn't taken too seriously.
Nolan films where stupid as hell.
Good writing and appropriate casting.
VOTE FOR BEST!
https://strawpoll.com/polls/2ayLWLD6MZ4
Long Halloween Part 1 is decent but the whole TDKR is good. I will vote by the way.
>Gotham Knights the show is going to flop
>Gotham Knights the game is probably
Both of those look awful.
>SOMETHING IN THE WAAAAAY
>SHE MOVES
by taking it away from israeli hands
I've always thought the concept of Batman was completely gay and moronic. So you're some rich fricking homosexual guy who dresses like a fricking gay flying rodent and ties up criminals for cops?
First of all, a gang of Black folk would ice this homosexual. Second of all, the entire concept is too moronic to even give a single frick about. Some homosexual in a gay costume is going to protect an entire city? With all of our cities turning into Black person infested lawless shitholes, the very idea of that is so completely stupid, it's impossible to even get into.
Next he's going to get gay BDSM shit to tie up hard pipe hitting Black folk and leave them for uncorrupt, unisraelited cops, who will actually show up when called?
Just stupid fricking israelite woo woo, all of which is sucking a dick in current year.
Just read some of the old comics from the 70s/80s