This was fricking insane
I never seen it because I thought it was going to be some boring ass shit
I never realized how far the sci-aspect goes
It's like Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann made into an Oscar movie
Anne Hathaway is super cute in short hair
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
is it actually good ? i havent watched it cuz seemed lame and not fun
Christopher Nolan may have the most faith in humanity , anyone has ever had, since at least Jesus Christ
Yeah it's crazy, it get really fun the longer it goes, it just keep going further and further and getting crazier and crazier the longer it goes
where do you think we are
Not on Cinemaphile that’s for goddamn sure.
He doesn’t
>ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWAH
If you're fans of the movie and actually appreciate the "love" element of the movie, I suggest reading this article and watching the video (based on the article).
https://medium.com/@somebadideas/on-interstellar-love-time-and-the-limitless-prison-of-our-cosmos-ef59ee28fd8e
Trust me, the love element of the film is much more nuanced than some here give it credit for and it goes into some interesting inspirations for this film(Jorge Luis Borges, Chris Marker's La Jetee).
>"hidden" meaning
The film shoves all that shit down your throat. This movie was like a midwit magnet. It spelled out a bunch of easy scienctific and some more abstract concepts for the audience, and they walked out of theater feeling like geniuses for understanding it.
t. midwit autist who doesn't realize irony of the situation
> It spelled out a bunch of easy scienctific and some more abstract concepts for the audience, and they walked out of theater feeling like geniuses for understanding it.
I can tell you haven't read the article but still, I'm sure this comment would be short enough for you to read.
> Midwits don’t really fundamentally understand any form of creative medium. They don’t partake in an aesthetic experience or an artistic reality but just a story. Plotholes matter more than what emotions and themes are evoked. They throw a fit whenever sentimentality is combined with realism in any way because years of cringe millennial pseudo nihilism shit weaned them on the idea that “realistic” things have to be stark and empty and morose. They also place a lot of stock in sticking rigidly to certain dogmas and so when you introduce some sort of metaphysics or emotional element that instantly infringes on the “science and facts” scheme of ideas in their head, it creates a dissonance because they need rigid sets of ideas for what constitutes realistic or not realistic. Add to that midwit insecurity and needing to vociferously assert when they feel they are smarter than the content they consume, and you have the reaction to this movie. I don’t even like it that much myself but it’s a good insight into the mind of a redditor.
Honestly, that's a great article. Nolan just doesn't suit my tastes but I can see what they were going for more clearly now. Good stuff.
It's one of the best SciFi movies of all time. It's a solid 8.5/10 throughout like 80% of the movie, peaking at 9/10% for 10% during times like the docking scene and then the last 10% is dropping to a 5/10 at the end.
the last 25m with the tesseract & hospital scene is 100% unadulterated kino.
yes
Yeah teevee memes about the love thing but Cinemaphile is also full of ESL gays who didnt get it
This is unironically one of the worst movies ever made.
Why.
Because it insults the intelligence of the viewer.
It's horrible movie, but I unironically love it.
>Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann
Being a weeb should be illegal.
It was good until the love transcends the universe part
its obviously ultra kino.
This is the best film to watch on a theater in the last 10-20 years.
>Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann
did you have a stroke while typing?
I looked it up, it’s weeb shit that even weebs are ashamed to admit to enjoying.
No they aren't. It's a great show, homosexual.
not really it's pretty popular actually
It was shit actually. Typical cold, lifeless Nolan dialouge. Tries its hardest to pretend it has substance, but in the end its all style. Get some taste.
Name your top 5 favorite sci-fi movies.
Critters 1 through 5.
It is an excellent film, yet somehow it produces a surprising amount of seethe from fa/tv/irgins on here
>fa/tv/irgins
Heh.
it's shit
LOVE
LOVE IS THE ONE THING
NOT ANY OTHER EMOTION, JUST THIS ONE
t. pays for sex
What exactly is wrong with that? It's a more honest relationship with foids.
It emotionally stunts you, makes you a bitter misogynist, and you are completely incapable of comprehending kinos that require empathy towards women or an understanding of love.
>empathy towards women
No.
Shitskin incel detected.
it works in the context
both guys look at her like she's moronic after saying it
epic reddit kino
nolan is literally a capeshit director so it's already shit by default, when it's not capeshit for him it's a soulless blockbuster
Interstellar: explains all the concepts carefully
>midwit tier normie waaaaaah
Tenet: doesn’t explain anything and just shows it
>too complicated waaaah black man waaah
Cinemaphile in a nutshell
Fat Ogre Shit. You in a Spacesuit.
>tesseract
do you guys think there are beings living the 4th dimension (or higher) and they can see our shitty 3d universe?
>Interstellar
>Oscar movie
Award for dumbest screenplay maybe
Why didn't he give a frick about his son?
Remember that famous crying scene of Cooper from the movie? Whose recordings do you think he was looking at while bawling his eyes out?
I don't mind the "love" shit because to me it's about general love and adoration of humanity rather than just dad loving his daughter and daughter loving his dad
I interpret it as infinite faith in human ingenuity and ability to resolve any problem we encounter in ways that seem ridiculus at a time
He grew up to be Casey Affleck ewwww
>infinite faith in human ingenuity
It's more that he believes it's our biggest tool against the cruelty of time. Our desire to accomplish great things as species hinges on us caring about our loved ones and especially future generations at the very least. Even megalomaniacs do their shit with a "future" in mind.
His son was content to work the farm as long as it offered him freedom while murph had a lot of potential and needed guiding
isnt it full of plotholes?
that's every Nolan film, but no one cares
Plotholes, poor sound editing, and garbage dialouge are Nolan staples
Between this movie and Arrival, I don't know what takes the title of Greatest Sci FI film for women.
The scifi aspect is rather shit.
>Earth crops are failing because uhhhhhhh
>magic wormhole pops up because uhhhhhhh
>have magic space shuttle with impossible capabilities
>need a old 60's tier expendable rocket to launch it even though it can land and return from multiple planets on it's own
>don't probe or survey any of the planets from orbit
>go to the time dilation planet first instead of last
>time dilation planet has massive waves even though that's not how tidal forces work
>crew is unprofessional morons that fight and frick everything up
>try spinning that's a good trick
>muh power of love, muh 4D book case, who needs science
>go into future to give yourself information in the past, totally not a paradox
>can drop info on gravity shit into the past but not info on how to prevent the crop failure in the first place
>humans have tech to build giant O'Neill cylinders and colonize exoplanets but can't fix Earth's environment
You can have handwavium scifi tech in a scifi story, but you have to make everything else in the story fit with the existence of that technology.
The magic space shuttle tech alone would allow them to build O'Neill cylinders.
The technology required to make replicants could solve most of human ailments and could probably make humans superhuman. It makes Zero sense in Dune to have space faring tech without calculators(even with the presence of Mentats). It makes zero sense for space faring ships to rely so much on analog in Alien. None of your sci-fi think about the endless possibilities of their magic tech. This isn’t film criticism.
Both of you are wasting your time and you're very likely getting into a long back and forth that will be of Zero(0) value to you. Trust me.
>space faring tech without calculators
to be clear, it's not space-faring tech, it's literally future sight mutated genes augmented by spice. without their "go fast" technology would be worthless because they would crash into objects in space.
>it's literally future sight mutated genes augmented by spice.
Yeah, moron and that's still dumb. Think of your simplistic electronic wrist watch and consider how much calculation it requires for operation. Either you have gazillion mentats or guild operators for every single complex task or they're single handedly managing all of this themselves. Either way the "in-universe" logic fails under scrutiny, just like every other sci-fi logic. So making arguments like this moronic
and a massive waste of time unless of course you admit, you don't like sci-fi.
oh and i forgot
>eat nothing but corn even though corn cannot supply all the necessary nutrition for humans to live
crops are failing because uhhhhhhh
a version of a well known documented eventuality of our current environmental impact
wormhole pops up because uhhhhhhh
because humans placed it there in the future
>>have magic space shuttle with impossible capabilities
what about it is impossible?
>>need a old 60's tier expendable rocket to launch it even though it can land and return from multiple planets on it's own
the shuttle that lands and returns to the mothership are smaller. the primary ship only needed to launch once, so they can jettison the fuel containers and engine.
>>don't probe or survey any of the planets from orbit
they do some, but not enough, agreed
>>go to the time dilation planet first instead of last
they at least explain their reasoning on this
>>time dilation planet has massive waves even though that's not how tidal forces work
it's not NOT how gravity works though
>>crew is unprofessional morons that fight and frick everything up
not a critique of the film
>>try spinning that's a good trick
legitimate astronautical maneuver
>>muh power of love, muh 4D book case, who needs science
it's a fictitious version of an understood scientific concept, appropriated for mass enjoyment and to make a point
>>go into future to give yourself information in the past, totally not a paradox
you don't understand time, ok
>>can drop info on gravity shit into the past but not info on how to prevent the crop failure in the first place
he didn't know how to stop the crop failures, but he had recently learned how to solve the "gravity problem" because of the black hole adventure
have tech to build giant O'Neill cylinders and colonize exoplanets but can't fix Earth's environment
i don't see how terraforming is necessarily a predecessor to megastructures or interstellar travel, but ok
it's a good film
>because humans placed it there in the future
which is a paradox, the wormhole exists because they went through the wormhole...
>what about it is impossible?
completely unrealistic amount of delta-v
>the shuttle that lands and returns to the mothership are smaller. the primary ship only needed to launch once, so they can jettison the fuel containers and engine.
With the insane level of delta-v and thrust the shuttle has (given it's tiny mass/volume) it wouldn't need a separate rocket to launch it. It is also never explained how they built the ring section of the ship which would appear to require at least around 20 superheavy rockets to launch. The ring itself is really too small to provide spin gravity as well, your head would be spinning faster than your feet causing disorientation
>which is a paradox
you're not thinking about time as a dimension that can be manipulated. read more or just suspend your disbelief about time being some monorail that moves ever forward. it's not a paradox just because you can't understand it.
>delta-v
you mean acceleration? what?
>it wouldn't need a separate rocket to launch it
the large space station is massive and did need a separate source of launch energy. i don't see how this is problematic.
>small annular ship
it's pretty damn big based on the relative dimensions we're shown of the shuttle's internal size vs the docking sequences. maybe it's shown on screen as too small, but if that's your complaint then i'm not worried about it from a film making perspective. a static object in a movie not being of the right dimension for your autistic preferences is not a valid reason to write off a sci-fi movie.
you sound genuinely moronic
>you're not thinking about time as a dimension that can be manipulated
They didn't have the tech to manipulate time as a dimension and thus make the wormhole until they went through the wormhole, therefore the wormhole cannot exist. It's goofy Bill & Ted tier time travel logic.
>you mean acceleration? what?
Delta-v is change in velocity, commonly measured in meters per second, basic spaceflight/orbital mechanics concept. No matter the size or mass of the ship, the delta-v requirements of any specific maneuver (like moving from low orbit to high orbit) remains the same.
Not the same thing as acceleration or thrust.
>it's pretty damn big based on the relative dimensions we're shown of the shuttle's internal size
It's smaller than the ISS, too small for spin gravity without making the crew ill.
>They didn't have the tech to manipulate time as a dimension and thus make the wormhole until they went through the wormhole
They're 5th dimensional beings who experience time simultaneously(think Doctors Manhattan) but being unbound from time meant they were unable to pin point to any specific point in time(to them it would be trying to select a specific drop of water in an ocean). Unlike, us regular humans who experience time linearly. Cooper and Murph's memories serve as the anchor for the whole thing to happen. If you weren't a midwit who obsessed over minor and petty details like the delt-v maybe you would've seen the bigger picture?
>It's smaller than the ISS, too small for spin gravity without making the crew ill.
If you paid attention to the movie it knocks out Brand when they tried the spinning. Cooper barely remains conscious.
this is all nitpicking
>Earth crops are failing because
due to increasing dirt storms, it's something that happens currently as well
https://www.kcur.org/news/2022-06-09/western-kansas-wheat-crops-are-failing-just-when-the-world-needs-them-most
>have magic space shuttle with impossible capabilities
the movie takes place unnamed time in the future, it's referred to multiple times over
>need a old 60's tier expendable rocket to launch it even though it can land and return from multiple planets on it's own
the rocket is there to launch the space station, not their ship
>crew is unprofessional morons that fight and frick everything up
the only guy that fought was a guy who was left in solitary for decades
corn can be used to feed animals which provide other nutritions
>go into future to give yourself information in the past, totally not a paradox
i never really thought about this because how could he save humanity if he fell into the black hole, but that leaves a cool option, dr. brands colony is the one that advances into the future tens of millions of eons into the future to make the technology to go back and use to Dr. Brands story as evidence of Coopers sacrifice and put the tesseract inside the black hole the only place it can exist using it as energy so he can make plan A happen which is more viable for future humans and saves the people on earth
>dr. brands colony is the one that advances into the future tens of millions of eons into the future to make the technology to go back
Not a theory but that's literally what happens. In the original script it was supposed to be super advanced chink robots but here it's humans. The only correction is that they don't have advanced time travel tech, they have ascended to (near) god like existence.
its more interesting too because i kind of wrote her planet off and was wondering whatever happened to their planet but thinking that a small human colony was able to make it that far into the future is pretty cool, however it still doesnt work because dr. brand used the wormhole placed by future humans to make it to the colony so its a circle
Any time travel movie will have paradoxes. To me that's the most pointless discussion to have. Everything from 12 monkeys to Terminator but there's so much more interesting things going on in these films that it's sad that they get derailed by some literal minded plot point mental midgets.
Yes, finally a movie showing the scientific fact of ghost hands in wormholes and multi-dimensional love geometry with respect to dust on midwestern bookshelves.
It's one of the most overrated movies I've ever seen.
I completely forgot I'd even watched it, I went to watch it recently, got an hour and a half into it and was like "hang on a sec... I've already watched this recently".
>admits to being moronic
>thinks anyone values her opinion
Same. I literally forgot everything about this movie. That's how bland and forgettable it was.
I only vaguely remember laughing with that book scene at the end. Kek so this the deep kino all these normies kept taking about.
God normalgays are so embarrassing.
>Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann
>Nolangay
OH NO NONNOONONOONO
Gurren Lagann is honestly better than Interstellar.
Great sci fi but not perfect
Don't believe anyone who says othewise.
only good thing from this movie is visuals and music. if weren't for that, id probably sleep through. the difference in quality for story and visuals is so great it disgust me. saw a comment on previous nolan thread
>1000$ steak with 20 cent ramen
and the worm butthole shit can be explain by a 10 years old nerd. i kek a little when the niggy explain that shit to an ASTRONAUT
I liked the story because it brims with positivity
It's a move about absolute belief in triumph of humanity
I think the story aged really well, since so many movies nowadays are about negativity
>cooper, we need you to find a new planet for us to live on, earth is getting too dusty
>there is this black hole system you could check out
>do we really want to live in a black hole system?
>yes earth is dusty get going
>alright there is a water planet let's not go there
>but there are important thing on planet let's go :^)
>it's a water planet you idiot we can't live on it
>and the telescope shows it's completely fricked up by the dark hole's presence
>no it's fine let's go :^)
it's neat that nolan made time space themes popular but holy hell it's also badly written
>If I describe the plot like a moron, it counts as a criticism!
18+ and stop watching cinemasins.
>another interstellar thread
>midwits voicing their lack of underatanding they try to disguise as plotholes or bad filmmaking critique
Every time, lmao
Unironically, there is nothing wrong with the technical aspects of this film, parts of them are great even.
The dialogue and some of the acting is actually so dogshit I would rather blow my brains out than watch this shit again.
I think his brother is in charge of writing some of that stuff and its just fricking awful.
It was his Brother's screenplay originally meant for Spielberg to direct.
>the dialogue and acting are dogshit
I didnt think so, they were serviceable and backseat to the plot anyway, you're being overly dramatic to compensate for a lack of real criticism
>WHHHHOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAH
>It's like Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann made into an Oscar movie
What? The frick?
It's pretty good except for the time travel through love. that was moronic.