True, however the social sciences need not be the clusterfrick they are now. They are still dominated by these people, meaning there are no social sciences that really explore difficult questions without reverting to some "woke" screed where the truth must take backseat to people's hysterical fear of racism/sexism/homohobia/transphobia etcetera..
In other words they have succeeded in what they set out to do, what might be called nonpartisan sociology has been reduced to a fringe science in the west. I used to be a fan of Steven Pinker but then I discovered he had been going to "e-girlta island" and my opinion of him fricking plummeted, I realized he was not objective and rational as he claimed but pushing some insane cult where its member delude themselves into thinking they are genetically superior while the underage girls are "shiksa".
It is very difficult to find social scientists who are honest and academically rigorous, they have made it this way. It is fricked. Outside the west at least there is little of this, you have the Muslim world, China, Russia, of course they have their own biases, but they are easy to see through.
In the 90s and 00s we were in a different place, we were willing to tackle the controversial in a reasonable manner and you have documentaries and honest self-examination like this, but this got shut down pretty quick.
>the social sciences need not be the clusterfrick they are now.
this particular social sciences professor didn't even seem to know what "social sciences" meant.
It doesn't matter that Matt Walsh didn't ask perfect questions, if you don't allow your opponent to argue their position without dancing around you with kid gloves and humoring your ideology you are making them defacto accept your position as fact and therefore not allowing any real argument to take place.
I would have preferred if he purely employed the Socratic method in this documentary and had more longform conversations, but I don't think it would have convinced many more people.
>I would actually like to see for once a troony defend their ideology >ideology
Bro, I'm just a small homosexual who is better at woman-things. It's not complicated. I'm not trying to rewrite reality. I guess I could go on a rant about the Anglo predilection for material reductionism, but... nah.
>I'm just a small homosexual who is better at woman-things
Why would you feel the need to act as a shield for mentally ill people if you just think of yourself as a feminine twink?
2 years ago
Anonymous
There are different etiologies for trannies. We all get lumped together no matter what. The only thing the individual can do is not be a spicy piece of shit, and hope people notice. I guess the biggest problem is that the West has no third gender category like in Asia. We're forced to associate ourselves as male or female, when our experiences, and even our bodies, don't align with that. This is what leads to the endless and pointless language debates. Posters can call me a man all they want, but I ask you: how much of a man would you feel like if you were deprived of your manhood? Hehe.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>We're forced to associate ourselves as male or female, when our experiences, and even our bodies, don't align with that.
Your bodies do align with one or the other. >Posters can call me a man all they want, but I ask you: how much of a man would you feel like if you were deprived of your manhood? Hehe.
I honestly can't tell if you're trolling or not but I'm going to engage you honestly, as an ex-troony myself. The penis itself is not what makes a man. Being a man means you're male, you have XY chromosomes. I would feel like less of a man if someone cut off my dick, yeah, of course. I'd feel like less of a man if I lost my legs or became paralyzed and my wife had to take care of me too. But I would still be a man.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>ex-troony
Tch. Nobody likes flip-floppers, fence sitters, or quitters.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Now I may have flip-flopped but I'm no fencesitter or a quitter. I just realized what I was doing wasn't healthy.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>the West has no third gender category like in Asia
trolling outside of /b/ is bannable
2 years ago
Anonymous
you realize why "third gender" is a thing there, right? it's not a good thing.
2 years ago
Anonymous
excuse me but isn't it a little bigoted to imply that consecrated temple prostitutes aren't a value-neutral addition at worst or a valued, vibrant piece of our diverse cultural patchwork at best
2 years ago
Anonymous
>"Hehe."
dont say this shit man you sound like a fricking moron and i didnt even read anything in this thread let alone the argument youre in
2 years ago
Anonymous
Of all the things I said that could've triggered you it was the giggle? You're funny.
2 years ago
Anonymous
teehee
😐
2 years ago
Anonymous
<3
2 years ago
Anonymous
You don't have manhood?
2 years ago
Anonymous
don't your people have some idiom about how the more someone claims a thing, the less true that thing is?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>your people
2 years ago
Anonymous
yes, you seem ESL
2 years ago
Anonymous
99.999999999999999999999999999% of people fit into male or female. Your experiences are irrelevant to your genetic physiology.
Same, I just got through that part and it just made him look stupid. He should have let the whole spiel play out. The way it comes across is that he's just be hiding parts of the guy's argument which doesn't help build his own case to the viewer.
that dude did not say a single direct thing and even listening to what was spliced together you can hear him basically forget what the was talking about multiple times.
You're right but that's all the more reason to let it play out in full.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>bro you did editing in a documentary for time and effect how dishonest
2 years ago
Anonymous
It didn't cut out that much time, though. And he has all those filler transitions. He really should have just let it all play out to remove any doubt that the guy he was talking to is a total idiot. It is dishonest, yeah, which only hurts his case. I'm not sure why you're so defensive over it unless you think I'm a concern trolling troony, but I assure you I'm not. I think he should have given the professor's case the full attention it should have gotten to remove any doubt that the dude is a moron.
2 years ago
Anonymous
If it's essentially true it's not dishonest, it's just a bad editing choice and unconvincing.
2 years ago
Anonymous
the biggest problem is that matt walsh did not ask "What are some characteristics of a woman"
2 years ago
Anonymous
>It is dishonest
You're saying you think the guy was making a valid point. He wasn't.
The editing was honest and necessary .
2 years ago
Anonymous
it was better to discredit him by letting it play fully
2 years ago
Anonymous
No, that would have ruined the film.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Why would you let some moron spew drivel for an extended period of time? It was drivel. They accurately conveyed to the viewer that it was total garbage without forcing us to sit through it.
Would have totally killed the film to include every bit of bloviating.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Exactly because it's drivel. I don't see the need to cut it up especially when it only helps Walsh's case.
>you should believe someone when they tell you who they are >if i were to tell you im a black man >... >.... >are you black? Are you african american?
Lmao ok matt walsh is still a homosexual but that interaction was fricking hilarious
You will never be a real steam locomotive. You have no coal, you have no combustion engine, you have no chimney. You are an electric train twisted by aesthetic modifications into a crude mockery of thomas savery’s perfection
No shit, and these troonys will always be unhappy, and always go to theit hugbox therapist who will happily take thier money.
Therapy is just prostitution for the mind. Everything you do in therapy you can do yourself, it just feels better doing it with someone else.
Truth about healthcare is that once you’ve been in it long enough, it can make you really see people as just whiny pieces of meat. Burnout among healthcare workers is real for many different reasons, not the least of which being a growing hatred of the people they treat.
this is terrifying but let's not pretend it's any different when you go to "real" doctors for "real" surgeries. you're either paying for actual world class surgeons because you're rich or you're pulling from the same slop that get forced through med school to keep graduation rates and funding up.
This IS the world class surgeons for these procedures, and they can't even agree what it's supposed to be while cutting into the patient. It's a completely non-standardized and immature surgery and most people aren't getting it with informed consent.
It's one thing to have a known surgery fricked up, this is just another level of terrifying.
Matt Walsh is a homosexual moron. Even if we ignore how out of date these gotcha lgbt interviews are, he can't even do it properly and just keeps trying to force in failing one liners and bait. He literally can't even argue properly with the gender studies moron.
walsh seems to be a gigantic homosexual himself but deary fricking me those morons he questioned, so out of touch, so out of any basic scientific ramifications, all purely dependend on muh feelings
men are more aggressive, more violent.
men are more forward, typically louder,
Traits traditionally viewed as masculine in Western society include strength, courage, independence, leadership, and assertiveness.
so women are more nurturing, intuitive, compassionate,
raits such as nurturance, sensitivity, sweetness, supportiveness, gentleness, warmth, passivity, cooperativeness, expressiveness, modesty, humility, empathy, affection, tenderness, and being emotional, kind, helpful, devoted, and understanding have been cited as stereotypically feminine.
>Easy answer is a woman via biology is a person born with xx chromosomes. A person can identify as a woman but bilogically be a male or female.
This is essentially what they were saying 10 years ago, and it's a great example of a slippery slope. First the Gay Agenda people get you to agree that someone can be born with the male biological sex, but he can choose to identify as the female psychological gender. Which is stupid enough. But then they go farther and erase the distinction between sex and gender which they worked so hard to push on the public. Now they want to make it illegal to say anything besides "yes that troony was born a biological woman with biologically female penis and testicles."
is it really a slippery slope if one day "doctors" suddenly decided transgenderism/GID wasn't a mental disorder? its more like an opening of floodgates.
How can you identify as something you're not? What are you identifying with? This idea that you can identify as a woman just proves that women are a distinguishable thing.
They can identify as such but they aren't.
The troon mania is a problem only because they try to force the world around them to treat them as and pretend that they are real women.
unlike sex, gender is pretty much something you can decide for yourself since it's about how you behave and has absolutely nothing to do with genitals.
>But they dont want to say that
what? No they do say that. There are no trans people claiming to be of the biological sex they weren't born with. The right has to cling to this stupid strawman because they don't want to admit the difference between sex and gender.
I don’t usually like conservative grifters like Walsh but this documentary was actually quite kino. I could see Michael Moore making something like this 20 years ago. (But about a leftist topic)
The white nationalist view on trannies is that they're insane peverted men larping as women. If I was making a documentary on trannies, I wouldn't ask "what is a woman?", I'd start with premise that there's no such thing as trans, period
>The white nationalist view on trannies is that they're insane peverted men larping as women
how is that anything but a normal view the average American would have 10 years ago?
middle east transitions people because homosexuals are haram you moron
2 years ago
Anonymous
Only Iran does that
2 years ago
Anonymous
I don’t think this is true. Most people find gays and lesbians to be physically revolting. Virtue signaling isn’t necessarily an accurate depiction of how a person truly thinks and feels.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>according to studies
Try having conversations with actual people
2 years ago
Anonymous
>admit you think trannies are insane >risk your career by being labeled bigot >wow look at all these lbgtsjskskal supportors!
2 years ago
Anonymous
According to top researchers your studies proved inconclusive.
2 years ago
Anonymous
how many people support puberty blocker on kids
2 years ago
Anonymous
According to top researchers you will never be a woman
2 years ago
Anonymous
Finally a sane voice in this transphobic thread, wish Cinemaphile had an actual upvote system so I could give you one.
2 years ago
Anonymous
1/10, it’s too obvious as bait but since it’s bait you get the 1 point.
2 years ago
Anonymous
if Cinemaphile had a voting system I wouldn't be able to see your moronic posts.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>we've studied ourselves and are happy to report we've decided we're women
Your outrageous assertation isn't even accurate in regards to America, let alone the rest of the world.
One of the most respected research groups showed that the average american is somewhat split on the issue but the majority do support transfolks and those with democratic leanings overwhemingly support us.
YOU ARE IN THE MINORITY DEAL WITH IT.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Support how?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>sample size: 10,221
worthless
2 years ago
Anonymous
please learn how statistics/surveying works at some point in your life.
2 years ago
Anonymous
how do they work buddy
2 years ago
Anonymous
well, if done correctly, you get a random sampling of people and survey them and that's a "representative sample" after a level of randomness/people.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>bro we surveyed a cherry-picked group of marxists in a blue state in the US, that means most people in the world think men are women
If you ever left your bedroom you'd quickly learn that the world isn't twitter, and the majority of the morons shilling for you trannies on twitter are just bots anyways. There's a reason you gays feel compelled to worm your ways into positions of influence and then ban any opinions that don't align with your feelings. That's not the behavior of people confident that the majority accept them.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>if anything ever says anything i don't like it was cherrypicked
ok
the reality is generally people don't give a shit and won't start screaming at random people about whatever their political beliefs are.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Regular people also don't want men in the girls locker room
2 years ago
Anonymous
again, people generally don't think about such situations until they are directly affected by them.
2 years ago
Anonymous
...and?
2 years ago
Anonymous
and what? that's the end of the argument.
2 years ago
Anonymous
...they will be affected when their daughter has the share the locker room with troons
2 years ago
Anonymous
>again, people generally don't think about such situations until they are directly affected by them.
And once directly affected by trannies, people are far more likely to think of you as mentally ill freaks. You are LITERALLY citing ignorance as support.
2 years ago
Anonymous
right, i forgot i was a troony. probably because i'm not one. oh well.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>right, i forgot i was a troony. probably because i'm not one. oh well.
Snap a picture of yourself and post it for us. Blur out the face or w/e. Refusal to do this confirms you're a troony.
2 years ago
Anonymous
, i forgot i was a troony. probably because i'm not one. oh well. >Snap a picture of yourself and post it for us. Blur out the face or w/e. Refusal to do this confirms you're a troony.
why would i need to provide evidence to refute an assertion without evidence?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Because you can quickly and easily provide evidence to support your assertation but refuse to do so. One's refusal to provide evidence readily available to them, which would take mere seconds to do, and would quickly win the argument for them by doing so, can only be taken as evidence in and of itself that my assertation is true. It's frankly illogical on every level to refuse to prove yourself correct when it's so easy to do.
2 years ago
Anonymous
what assertion?
someone started arguing against what you were saying and you immediately assumed they MUST be trannies. because who else would say something completely true like
>most people don't care
2 years ago
Anonymous
"Most people don't care" was your final cope after first suggesting most people support trannies. Nobody but a fricking brain-dead troony would suggest most people support them in the first place. You continue to refuse to snap a quick picture to prove you're not a troony, ergo you're a fricking troony.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>most people support trannies.
link the post.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Just follow the chain back.
2 years ago
Anonymous
ever consider, maybe, a third party jumped in and told both sides that most people don't think about this shit at all, one way or the other? or is there only one other person on Cinemaphile?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Just don't think about it, I don't
Great contribution to the discussion and the thread.
2 years ago
Anonymous
thanks. that means a lot.
2 years ago
Anonymous
No, because this is an anonymous imageboard with a culture of identifying yourself as "not that anon" when inserting yourself into an ongoing back-and-forth and answering in place of one side. Since you didn't do so, I am in my rights to believe you're the same anon backpedaling, especially since whoever you suggest the second party was you play third to, mysteriously stopped replying to me the moment you "stepped in" on his behalf.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>this is an anonymous image board therefore anyone who replies to me is the same person, even if they're saying something completely different.
lol
2 years ago
Anonymous
So is your argument about your own ignorance on the topic then? Why are you inserting yourself into this conversation that only trannies and supposedly abnormal people involve themselves in?
2 years ago
Anonymous
You do realize that the first thing people with actual responsibilities think about when facing change is how many things can go wrong because of it, right?
Or do you not have anyone depending on you to do anything?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>i worry about what-if scenarios
ok. are you a woman? cause that's a woman thing.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>ok. are you a woman? cause that's a woman thing.
No, it's actually quite literally the opposite. Women do not spend any time at all considering the consequences of their actions,. rationalization and logic are expressly male traits.
2 years ago
Anonymous
you've shifted from worrying about what will change if something changes to worrying about what will happen when you do something.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I wasn't even the dude you were arguing with, you're just a fricking moron and I felt compelled to say so.
2 years ago
Anonymous
so you've just confessed you can't even keep track of the content between a post and a reply.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>dodges the question entirely
Yeah, I thought so. Since nobody is depending on you for anything, I suppose it’s pretty easy for you assume that the average person doesn’t think things ahead.
2 years ago
Anonymous
the average person absolutely does not obsess over what-if scenarios.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>obsess
you're so transparent with this
2 years ago
Anonymous
i hope i am being transparent in implying you are mentally ill and making it worse by screaming about this and trying to normalize your inner-thoughts to others.
you might even have a touch of the 'tism if you regularly assume your thoughts/feelings are universal.
2 years ago
Anonymous
yikes bestie who hurt you??
2 years ago
Anonymous
>One of the most respected research groups showed that the average american is somewhat split on the issue but the majority do support transfolks and those with democratic leanings overwhemingly support us.
No they didn't, and even if they had, like I said >we have researched ourselves and determined things are the way we say they are
You're moronic, and the moment you pull out of America, your belief system becomes even less accepted. There's 8 billion people on the planet and at least 7 billion of those people would consider you a mentally ill freak. Only the most moronic people in America, Canada and a few European countries accept you.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Again, you stupid goddamned homosexual, virtue signaling does NOT provide an accurate representation of how people actually feel. Most people think you and your are a freak and will be cold and distant toward you, but they don’t want other people to think they’re buttholes, so they’ll claim that they support your right to express yourself how you wish.
I don’t even know why I’m bothering to explain this to you— you’ll inevitably collapse under the weight of your own delusion and have a nice day anyway. Enjoy it while it lasts you creep.
2 years ago
Anonymous
anon, most people don't think about this stuff at all.
they certainly don't scream into the void of Cinemaphile about it.
>as long as they stay the hell away from me then I don’t care what they do
This is the general mental framework for the person who believes in letting people do whatever makes them happy, and I’d be a liar if I didn’t say I was one of them. Unfortunately trannies want validation, which is not the same as “live and let live”.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Unfortunately trannies want validation
they can't force you to give it to them.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>call me my pronouns or get cancelled
2 years ago
Anonymous
you are in no danger of being "canceled."
2 years ago
Anonymous
hahaha you must think you're acting very calm and smart by talking like this, like a child trying to get out of trouble by being pedantic
you know what he's talking about moron, don't pretend you don't
2 years ago
Anonymous
>it will never happen >it is happening, but only to some people (we are here) >it is happening often, get used to it >it happens to you
2 years ago
Anonymous
Unless you're Canadian.
2 years ago
Anonymous
No, but the reason we are having this discussion is because despite how absurd it is, they try to do just about anything to force other people to feed them the validation they so desperately crave. It’s sustenance for them, and they can’t get it without getting other, physically/mentally sound people to give it to them.
Nah, that other Anon was right. Everyone sneers and talks about you behind your backs. Its this way in schools, in workplaces, and in families. People always talk.
2 years ago
Anonymous
nah, most people don't really concern themselves with the lives of others.
2 years ago
Anonymous
This is correct insofar as normal white people (ie proto white nationalists) actively do not want to know what degenerates like you get up to in private, or what you believe; but when you make yourself public, when you interact with the institutions of the state, when you try to inject yourself into children's lives, that's when it stops being about you and starts being about them, and that's when they react with disgust. Honestly whites are the most tolerant people on earth, because they'd let you live your entire life in an asylum using whatever pronouns you like, instead of burning you alive in the streets like they do in Africa and South America. But you're going for broke and you're going to reap what you're sowing.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Everyone on planet Earth concerns themselves with the lives of others. We've been gossiping, talking shit, wondering, asking, conversing, advancing, postulating and philosophizing with each other since the beginning of language.
Even a casual glance at real people will tell you that you are wrong. People simply take the path of least resistance - that's usually being polite on the surface and keeping the nasty words for places behind someone's back.
Its the same in every era, in every culture across history. The only thing we all agree on intrinsically is that every other human being alive is potential competition.
>inb4 But I don't agree!
Then you must have something wrong with you. I can't be responsible for your skill issues at being alive.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You are mostly correct, although I will add that you can extend a feeling of non-competition to close friends and family.
2 years ago
Anonymous
you know people always normalize their behavior as common, right?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yeah, because more often than not, it is. We are all still humans at the end of the day, after all. And even though we have our quirks, the fundamental behaviors are similar across time and cultures.
2 years ago
Anonymous
ever heard of confirmation bias?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yeah, but I don’t see how what I’m saying is evidence of that.
2 years ago
Anonymous
you don't see how your confirmation bias is literally a confirmation bias?
ever heard of cognitive dissonance?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Sounds like you're the one obsessed with trannies, 99% of the country honestly don't care and would rather just let people be happy.
2 years ago
Anonymous
yeah all those young morons that go through surgery and then kill themselves when they realize what they did are very happy
2 years ago
Anonymous
you don't seem able to differentiate between vast unconcerned majorities and tiny motivated minorities
2 years ago
Anonymous
>43%
2 years ago
Anonymous
And just like the people in the documentary, those people only support you because they don't want to hurt your feelings.
If gender and sex are two different things, and you decide your gender is female, guess what biological sex you still are genius? I'll give you a hint: you have trillions of chromosomes in your body from this sex.
This is why no one in the documentary will say what a women is, they're stopping just short of saying what everybody; your doctors, your parents, your friends, your body, and YOU know: YOU ARE A BIOLOGICAL MALE.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>TRANSRIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS >ARE YOU TRANSPHOBIC? HUH HUH? >YOU CAN'T SAY THINGS LIKE THAT IT'S TRANSPHOBIC >CANADA HAS LAWS THAT CRIMINALIZE MISGENDERING, WOW THEY ARE THE GOOD GUYS >OH MY GOD HAVE YOU WATCHED EUPHORIA? THAT TRANSGIRL HAS SUCH A SAD STORY! >Okay, here's our survey, can you tell us how you feel about how greater acceptance of transgender people is good for society? Please put your name and phone number and address too.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>YOU ARE IN THE MINORITY DEAL WITH IT.
Translation: >The peaceful democratic process is unavailable to you; proceed accordingly.
Ok
So, you chose moronation.
You dumb c**ts associate every single oppositional viewpoint as white nationalism, or white supremacy. It's really lazy, really dishonest, and really fricking stupid. 41% yourself.
>If I was making a documentary on trannies, I wouldn't ask "what is a woman?", I'd start with premise that there's no such thing as trans, period
No one asked you. Asking the people that champion the idea of gender being fluid to define their words is the entire point. Seeing them get flustered when you ask for the truth, not "their truth" but THE truth. Going around yelling YWNBAW is just confrontational and gets you nowhere
>The white nationalist view on trannies is that they're insane peverted men larping as women.
I think that's just the view on trannies held by 90%+ of the modern world. Most asians, blacks and brown people would straight up tell you as much, some would kill you for suggesting otherwise. It's actually mostly ~~*white*~~ people who push this troony shit.
> The white nationalist view on trannies is that they're insane peverted men larping as women
Nope, that’s the normal view of any sane person. You get the same answer if you ask Asians, Africans, Indians, South Americans, etc.
I would love to interview that wolf identifying homosexual. My question would be >If you are a wolf how come I could kill you very easily with my bare hands?
What about the argument that women are the ones responsible for bearing and birthing children? You can’t call yourself a woman if you can’t perform the biggest responsibility of the female human form.
I have a (biologically) female friend with an extremely fertile body that can't have kids. If you want to go down that road you can but all it does is damage actual women in the crossfire.
>Russia invades Ukraine >Covid and Monkey virus >School now literally teach kids about dildos and sex >Taliban control Afghanistan
This image is just incorrect
>terrorists literally take over afganistan >they teach gay sex in schools (except florida in under 4th grade)
Aw shucks time to fix the pie chart. Damn i want some pie
Yes, this is the joke. Twice this has been done, and twice it has been found out after the fact that these organizations have allowed previously-convicted sex offenders into a classroom to read books to small children.
There's a number of cases that the men who show up to "perform" drag queen story hour or whatever have previous convictions as sex offenders with minors. That image, specifically is from one of those--that's an outreach event hosted by libraries. Mostly arranged by white neoliberal women.
The other anon is incorrect in that it's mostly teachers pushing some of the lgbtq+ and identification stuff in schools. I'd like to believe that guests on the premises actually have a little bit of a background run before being let loose around children, but who knows at this point.
A man is a person who has to burden the responsibility of doing hard and dangerous things. A woman, on the other hand, does not.
For all intents and purposes, feminists are men and transvestites are women. Trannies run from and expect to be protected from their troubles whereas feminists engage them directly.
Because no child has ever gone against their parents wishes ever in their life. Just in this case the rebellion will cause permanent damage and suicide as a result, but totally the same as becoming a goth for a year or something.
The good news is that it’s virtually impossible for kids to get on hormonal therapy until they’re 18. If pop culture manages to do a better job of convincing them to chemically/physically castrate themselves then you do at trying to prevent it, then too bad.
There was literally a case discussed on this very documentary about a 13 year old given chemical castration drugs against her fathers wishes in which he was jailed for.
2 years ago
Anonymous
How did the kid gain access to the drug, let alone administer it to themselves properly?
2 years ago
Anonymous
hospital gave it to her, holy shit just watch the thing instead of arguing like a moron
2 years ago
Anonymous
I refuse to give views to anyone who espouses hate and bigotry and wish more people here would do the same.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I’ll watch it later, I’m just baffled by how the kid received that kind of medication without their parent’s consent and somehow the parent was punished for it. It’s not supposed to work that way.
naive complacent leftist parents who look at the state of America today and fail to see the problem or take any precautions against it, people like this got us into this situation in the first place
Man why do all documentaries fail in some regard. 32 minutes in, he's doing a fricking montage of troony athletes dominating female divisions instead of providing raw data that men genetically are stronger than women etc. Frick it's frustrating.
Less convincing and less able to blow the frick out naysayers like the fat homosexual he's interviewing as the montage is going. But sure it's funny haha.
... what would you have preferred? what data-points do you think would've been utterly inarguable to people who's entire existence is a losing argument with reality?
Actually normal people aren't convinced by data. I thought the juxtaposition of the guys words with the video of women getting dominated by masquerading men was great. Poignant.
I guess I'm just to intelligent because I was sitting there waiting for data instead of cherry picked footage. For the record I agree with what the documentarian is doing so far.
They should have cut the whole trans athlete part. The fat brown man was right, most trannies fail at sports, it's just a bunch of dudes dressing up as ladies and ruining it for everyone.
Have you guys ever seen a troony? They aren't the athletic type.
Those dudes just grow out their hair because they have bad sportmanship and want to smash all the female athletes. And again, why does it matter? Female sports are a joke, women deserve to have a bunch of larpers beat them at volleyball.
>why does it matter
it came up because people kept saying there were no differences between men and women. there are. they are pretty sizable at a casual level and become more and more pronounced at a competitive level.
of course the fat moron was harping about the idea if trans is a sports advantage or not unto itself, because he wasn't (properly) trapped into saying there were no major physical differences between men and women.
of course the fat moron was harping about the idea if trans is a sports advantage or not unto itself, because he wasn't (properly) trapped into saying there were no major physical differences between men and women.
Hit the nail on the head, particularly: >he wasn't (properly) trapped into saying there were no major physical differences between men and women.
This doc is made for mouth breathing daily wire subs so they can circle jerk with each other. I mean it's pretty well made but it comes across as a black comedy more than an informative documentary. It's kind of sad; most people will laugh about it and then move on with their lives but all this insane and demonic shit will keep happening. It's already too late tbh. The conservatives meant well when they said they just wanted to be left alone and let people live how they want to live. I miss Hitler.
What is a woman? >What do you think is a woman?
What is a woman? >Why do you want to know that?
What is a woman? >You're being very transphobic and possibly antisemitic at this point
What is a woman? >My years of gender studies have not prepared me for this question
95 percent or more of trannies are casualties of a psychic war of worldview and should be viewed as such but boy i sure am glad that i am a poor peckerwood living in the sticks so i never have to deal with these things
I would love to keep treating them with kid gloves but they have been turned into foot soldiers for the psychic war and they're rapidly gaining ground. They were never going to have normal lives again so might as well just try and have them face the truth rather than trying to get them help that they'll never accept.
These are the clowns who taught us and will teach out children.
he's a social sciences professor, all he'll teach are morons.
So teachers?
True, however the social sciences need not be the clusterfrick they are now. They are still dominated by these people, meaning there are no social sciences that really explore difficult questions without reverting to some "woke" screed where the truth must take backseat to people's hysterical fear of racism/sexism/homohobia/transphobia etcetera..
In other words they have succeeded in what they set out to do, what might be called nonpartisan sociology has been reduced to a fringe science in the west. I used to be a fan of Steven Pinker but then I discovered he had been going to "e-girlta island" and my opinion of him fricking plummeted, I realized he was not objective and rational as he claimed but pushing some insane cult where its member delude themselves into thinking they are genetically superior while the underage girls are "shiksa".
It is very difficult to find social scientists who are honest and academically rigorous, they have made it this way. It is fricked. Outside the west at least there is little of this, you have the Muslim world, China, Russia, of course they have their own biases, but they are easy to see through.
In the 90s and 00s we were in a different place, we were willing to tackle the controversial in a reasonable manner and you have documentaries and honest self-examination like this, but this got shut down pretty quick.
>the social sciences need not be the clusterfrick they are now.
this particular social sciences professor didn't even seem to know what "social sciences" meant.
Got any context for those who don't follow this kind of shit 24/7?
Trains
>the editing to make it seem like the homosexual is rambling for hours
>its really a few sentences
Dishonest filmmaking
This
I would actually like to see for once a troony defend their ideology but conservitards always go for low hanging fruit
It doesn't matter that Matt Walsh didn't ask perfect questions, if you don't allow your opponent to argue their position without dancing around you with kid gloves and humoring your ideology you are making them defacto accept your position as fact and therefore not allowing any real argument to take place.
I would have preferred if he purely employed the Socratic method in this documentary and had more longform conversations, but I don't think it would have convinced many more people.
>I would actually like to see for once a troony defend their ideology
>ideology
Bro, I'm just a small homosexual who is better at woman-things. It's not complicated. I'm not trying to rewrite reality. I guess I could go on a rant about the Anglo predilection for material reductionism, but... nah.
>Bro, I'm just a small homosexual who is better at woman-things.
If you can admit you're a man then you're not the issue here.
>I'm just a small homosexual who is better at woman-things
Why would you feel the need to act as a shield for mentally ill people if you just think of yourself as a feminine twink?
There are different etiologies for trannies. We all get lumped together no matter what. The only thing the individual can do is not be a spicy piece of shit, and hope people notice. I guess the biggest problem is that the West has no third gender category like in Asia. We're forced to associate ourselves as male or female, when our experiences, and even our bodies, don't align with that. This is what leads to the endless and pointless language debates. Posters can call me a man all they want, but I ask you: how much of a man would you feel like if you were deprived of your manhood? Hehe.
>We're forced to associate ourselves as male or female, when our experiences, and even our bodies, don't align with that.
Your bodies do align with one or the other.
>Posters can call me a man all they want, but I ask you: how much of a man would you feel like if you were deprived of your manhood? Hehe.
I honestly can't tell if you're trolling or not but I'm going to engage you honestly, as an ex-troony myself. The penis itself is not what makes a man. Being a man means you're male, you have XY chromosomes. I would feel like less of a man if someone cut off my dick, yeah, of course. I'd feel like less of a man if I lost my legs or became paralyzed and my wife had to take care of me too. But I would still be a man.
>ex-troony
Tch. Nobody likes flip-floppers, fence sitters, or quitters.
Now I may have flip-flopped but I'm no fencesitter or a quitter. I just realized what I was doing wasn't healthy.
>the West has no third gender category like in Asia
trolling outside of /b/ is bannable
you realize why "third gender" is a thing there, right? it's not a good thing.
excuse me but isn't it a little bigoted to imply that consecrated temple prostitutes aren't a value-neutral addition at worst or a valued, vibrant piece of our diverse cultural patchwork at best
>"Hehe."
dont say this shit man you sound like a fricking moron and i didnt even read anything in this thread let alone the argument youre in
Of all the things I said that could've triggered you it was the giggle? You're funny.
teehee
😐
<3
You don't have manhood?
don't your people have some idiom about how the more someone claims a thing, the less true that thing is?
>your people
yes, you seem ESL
99.999999999999999999999999999% of people fit into male or female. Your experiences are irrelevant to your genetic physiology.
yeah i didn't like that either, just made matt seem really petty. 'blah blah blah what a lib professor windbag. sure glad i didnt go to college hehe!'
Same, I just got through that part and it just made him look stupid. He should have let the whole spiel play out. The way it comes across is that he's just be hiding parts of the guy's argument which doesn't help build his own case to the viewer.
that dude did not say a single direct thing and even listening to what was spliced together you can hear him basically forget what the was talking about multiple times.
You're right but that's all the more reason to let it play out in full.
>bro you did editing in a documentary for time and effect how dishonest
It didn't cut out that much time, though. And he has all those filler transitions. He really should have just let it all play out to remove any doubt that the guy he was talking to is a total idiot. It is dishonest, yeah, which only hurts his case. I'm not sure why you're so defensive over it unless you think I'm a concern trolling troony, but I assure you I'm not. I think he should have given the professor's case the full attention it should have gotten to remove any doubt that the dude is a moron.
If it's essentially true it's not dishonest, it's just a bad editing choice and unconvincing.
the biggest problem is that matt walsh did not ask "What are some characteristics of a woman"
>It is dishonest
You're saying you think the guy was making a valid point. He wasn't.
The editing was honest and necessary .
it was better to discredit him by letting it play fully
No, that would have ruined the film.
Why would you let some moron spew drivel for an extended period of time? It was drivel. They accurately conveyed to the viewer that it was total garbage without forcing us to sit through it.
Would have totally killed the film to include every bit of bloviating.
Exactly because it's drivel. I don't see the need to cut it up especially when it only helps Walsh's case.
I don't think he was making a valid point, I just think it's dishonest to cut up your opponent's argument, even one as poor as that, to make a funny.
it wasn't cut up, it was just cross-faded a bit.
>dishonest
You keep using that word. It doesn't mean what you think it means.
Yeah, he could have gotten a lot more out of the guy had he not gone for the pretending to be stonefaced autistic dummy route.
what a dishonest comment
>you should believe someone when they tell you who they are
>if i were to tell you im a black man
>...
>....
>are you black? Are you african american?
Lmao ok matt walsh is still a homosexual but that interaction was fricking hilarious
You will never be a real steam locomotive. You have no coal, you have no combustion engine, you have no chimney. You are an electric train twisted by aesthetic modifications into a crude mockery of thomas savery’s perfection
based
Frankly this.
my dad is also trains man
trains is dangerous job stay safe
man trains are so cool
Be safe out there, trains is hard job
God it really is about protecting people's feelings. No scientific foundation whatsoever.
What about the feelings of people who don't want this forced on them?
It's really nothing but evil. Pure and simple. They hate truth, they hate beauty, they hate good.
ditch the histrionics
I direct you to
Those people dont disproportionally spend their time in mental hospitals or in therapy 2 times a week
No shit, and these troonys will always be unhappy, and always go to theit hugbox therapist who will happily take thier money.
Therapy is just prostitution for the mind. Everything you do in therapy you can do yourself, it just feels better doing it with someone else.
OH SHIT /jazz/bros our doctor is in this
Can I get context for this clip? I feel terrified for whoever is under that knife
That's Dr. Marci Bowers and Dr. Jess Ting (really) giving Jazz her new vegana.
>man
>made
>horrors
You should really watch I Am Jazz.
How many surgeries did he end up having?
Four, I think.
What a conveniently profitable business model
its not exactly a private practice.
what the FRICK
the surgery isn't enough drama, they have to add mid-surgery banter? I hope this is fake and edited. thats a persons body, man
Truth about healthcare is that once you’ve been in it long enough, it can make you really see people as just whiny pieces of meat. Burnout among healthcare workers is real for many different reasons, not the least of which being a growing hatred of the people they treat.
>t. worked in hospital pharmacy for 8 years
that doesn't surprise me
that surgeon is acting like jazz's scar tissue is just a pimple she wants to pop
this is terrifying but let's not pretend it's any different when you go to "real" doctors for "real" surgeries. you're either paying for actual world class surgeons because you're rich or you're pulling from the same slop that get forced through med school to keep graduation rates and funding up.
This IS the world class surgeons for these procedures, and they can't even agree what it's supposed to be while cutting into the patient. It's a completely non-standardized and immature surgery and most people aren't getting it with informed consent.
It's one thing to have a known surgery fricked up, this is just another level of terrifying.
Matt Walsh is a homosexual moron. Even if we ignore how out of date these gotcha lgbt interviews are, he can't even do it properly and just keeps trying to force in failing one liners and bait. He literally can't even argue properly with the gender studies moron.
Damn I guess I love $6.75 a gallon for gasoline now
Fellow right wingers, Matt Walsh is imperfect so we must suck the troony wiener
just from this seethe i know that literal homosexual hit everything on the nose when it comes to you grooming troony pedophile homosexuals
walsh seems to be a gigantic homosexual himself but deary fricking me those morons he questioned, so out of touch, so out of any basic scientific ramifications, all purely dependend on muh feelings
It's so sad how choo choo no longer choos.
Anime, tsk, tsk, tsk. Why is it always anime? Why does anime screw piggu kids minds up?
Anime is based and redpilled
>The Tragedy of Modern railway systems
>Video has nothing to do with Railway systems.
You guys are trolling, right?
Trains is hard job
hahah what a gay!
I was genuinely dumbfounded by this part. Usually I can identify the typical lefty gaslighting bad faith reactions, but this one stumped me.
It was like a vampire reacting to garlic.
More like a commissar getting interrogated
Easy answer is a woman via biology is a person born with xx chromosomes. A person can identify as a woman but bilogically be a male or female.
But they dont want to say that because it hurts their feefees and reality breaks them mentally.
how do men differ from women,
men are more aggressive, more violent.
men are more forward, typically louder,
Traits traditionally viewed as masculine in Western society include strength, courage, independence, leadership, and assertiveness.
so women are more nurturing, intuitive, compassionate,
raits such as nurturance, sensitivity, sweetness, supportiveness, gentleness, warmth, passivity, cooperativeness, expressiveness, modesty, humility, empathy, affection, tenderness, and being emotional, kind, helpful, devoted, and understanding have been cited as stereotypically feminine.
>Easy answer is a woman via biology is a person born with xx chromosomes. A person can identify as a woman but bilogically be a male or female.
This is essentially what they were saying 10 years ago, and it's a great example of a slippery slope. First the Gay Agenda people get you to agree that someone can be born with the male biological sex, but he can choose to identify as the female psychological gender. Which is stupid enough. But then they go farther and erase the distinction between sex and gender which they worked so hard to push on the public. Now they want to make it illegal to say anything besides "yes that troony was born a biological woman with biologically female penis and testicles."
is it really a slippery slope if one day "doctors" suddenly decided transgenderism/GID wasn't a mental disorder? its more like an opening of floodgates.
You can identify as anything, you don't have the right to BE identified at whatever you chose though.
How can you identify as something you're not? What are you identifying with? This idea that you can identify as a woman just proves that women are a distinguishable thing.
I identify as Elon Musk. I demand you recognize my bankbalancenouns.
They can identify as such but they aren't.
The troon mania is a problem only because they try to force the world around them to treat them as and pretend that they are real women.
unlike sex, gender is pretty much something you can decide for yourself since it's about how you behave and has absolutely nothing to do with genitals.
>it's about how you behave
Where us the list of all genders and their exclusive behaviours?
homie either u like dick vegana or both what is wrong with you
What is a woman and how do you behave like one?
>But they dont want to say that
what? No they do say that. There are no trans people claiming to be of the biological sex they weren't born with. The right has to cling to this stupid strawman because they don't want to admit the difference between sex and gender.
Sex is reality, gender is imagination. I will happily admit that the real and the fictional are different
i would like to sit in one of his lectures
Is this thread autosaging?
I don’t usually like conservative grifters like Walsh but this documentary was actually quite kino. I could see Michael Moore making something like this 20 years ago. (But about a leftist topic)
It was similar in may ways to Hjernevask. I think he might have taken some inspiration from it.
I think Matt Walsh is trying to play catch up with white nationalist talking points or his audience will lose interest
what white nationalist talking points?
The white nationalist view on trannies is that they're insane peverted men larping as women. If I was making a documentary on trannies, I wouldn't ask "what is a woman?", I'd start with premise that there's no such thing as trans, period
>The white nationalist view on trannies is that they're insane peverted men larping as women
how is that anything but a normal view the average American would have 10 years ago?
Its still the viewpoint of the silent majority
According to studies the majority of people support transfolk and LGBT rights in general, you are actually in the minority here.
That's okay.
Delusional. Go to the Middle East, Eastern Europe or China and ask them if they support trannies. Are they all white nationalists too?
Yes, the bastion of modern civilization, afganistan and china...
Unironically more civilized than 2022 America where children are being groomed into infertile freaks by the country's own education system.
>Yes, the bastion of modern civilization, afganistan and china...
This but unironically.
Yeah selling drugs to kids is profitable.
middle east transitions people because homosexuals are haram you moron
Only Iran does that
I don’t think this is true. Most people find gays and lesbians to be physically revolting. Virtue signaling isn’t necessarily an accurate depiction of how a person truly thinks and feels.
>according to studies
Try having conversations with actual people
>admit you think trannies are insane
>risk your career by being labeled bigot
>wow look at all these lbgtsjskskal supportors!
According to top researchers your studies proved inconclusive.
how many people support puberty blocker on kids
According to top researchers you will never be a woman
Finally a sane voice in this transphobic thread, wish Cinemaphile had an actual upvote system so I could give you one.
1/10, it’s too obvious as bait but since it’s bait you get the 1 point.
if Cinemaphile had a voting system I wouldn't be able to see your moronic posts.
>we've studied ourselves and are happy to report we've decided we're women
Your outrageous assertation isn't even accurate in regards to America, let alone the rest of the world.
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/02/11/deep-partisan-divide-on-whether-greater-acceptance-of-transgender-people-is-good-for-society/
One of the most respected research groups showed that the average american is somewhat split on the issue but the majority do support transfolks and those with democratic leanings overwhemingly support us.
YOU ARE IN THE MINORITY DEAL WITH IT.
Support how?
>sample size: 10,221
worthless
please learn how statistics/surveying works at some point in your life.
how do they work buddy
well, if done correctly, you get a random sampling of people and survey them and that's a "representative sample" after a level of randomness/people.
>bro we surveyed a cherry-picked group of marxists in a blue state in the US, that means most people in the world think men are women
If you ever left your bedroom you'd quickly learn that the world isn't twitter, and the majority of the morons shilling for you trannies on twitter are just bots anyways. There's a reason you gays feel compelled to worm your ways into positions of influence and then ban any opinions that don't align with your feelings. That's not the behavior of people confident that the majority accept them.
>if anything ever says anything i don't like it was cherrypicked
ok
the reality is generally people don't give a shit and won't start screaming at random people about whatever their political beliefs are.
Regular people also don't want men in the girls locker room
again, people generally don't think about such situations until they are directly affected by them.
...and?
and what? that's the end of the argument.
...they will be affected when their daughter has the share the locker room with troons
>again, people generally don't think about such situations until they are directly affected by them.
And once directly affected by trannies, people are far more likely to think of you as mentally ill freaks. You are LITERALLY citing ignorance as support.
right, i forgot i was a troony. probably because i'm not one. oh well.
>right, i forgot i was a troony. probably because i'm not one. oh well.
Snap a picture of yourself and post it for us. Blur out the face or w/e. Refusal to do this confirms you're a troony.
, i forgot i was a troony. probably because i'm not one. oh well.
>Snap a picture of yourself and post it for us. Blur out the face or w/e. Refusal to do this confirms you're a troony.
why would i need to provide evidence to refute an assertion without evidence?
Because you can quickly and easily provide evidence to support your assertation but refuse to do so. One's refusal to provide evidence readily available to them, which would take mere seconds to do, and would quickly win the argument for them by doing so, can only be taken as evidence in and of itself that my assertation is true. It's frankly illogical on every level to refuse to prove yourself correct when it's so easy to do.
what assertion?
someone started arguing against what you were saying and you immediately assumed they MUST be trannies. because who else would say something completely true like
>most people don't care
"Most people don't care" was your final cope after first suggesting most people support trannies. Nobody but a fricking brain-dead troony would suggest most people support them in the first place. You continue to refuse to snap a quick picture to prove you're not a troony, ergo you're a fricking troony.
>most people support trannies.
link the post.
Just follow the chain back.
ever consider, maybe, a third party jumped in and told both sides that most people don't think about this shit at all, one way or the other? or is there only one other person on Cinemaphile?
>Just don't think about it, I don't
Great contribution to the discussion and the thread.
thanks. that means a lot.
No, because this is an anonymous imageboard with a culture of identifying yourself as "not that anon" when inserting yourself into an ongoing back-and-forth and answering in place of one side. Since you didn't do so, I am in my rights to believe you're the same anon backpedaling, especially since whoever you suggest the second party was you play third to, mysteriously stopped replying to me the moment you "stepped in" on his behalf.
>this is an anonymous image board therefore anyone who replies to me is the same person, even if they're saying something completely different.
lol
So is your argument about your own ignorance on the topic then? Why are you inserting yourself into this conversation that only trannies and supposedly abnormal people involve themselves in?
You do realize that the first thing people with actual responsibilities think about when facing change is how many things can go wrong because of it, right?
Or do you not have anyone depending on you to do anything?
>i worry about what-if scenarios
ok. are you a woman? cause that's a woman thing.
>ok. are you a woman? cause that's a woman thing.
No, it's actually quite literally the opposite. Women do not spend any time at all considering the consequences of their actions,. rationalization and logic are expressly male traits.
you've shifted from worrying about what will change if something changes to worrying about what will happen when you do something.
I wasn't even the dude you were arguing with, you're just a fricking moron and I felt compelled to say so.
so you've just confessed you can't even keep track of the content between a post and a reply.
>dodges the question entirely
Yeah, I thought so. Since nobody is depending on you for anything, I suppose it’s pretty easy for you assume that the average person doesn’t think things ahead.
the average person absolutely does not obsess over what-if scenarios.
>obsess
you're so transparent with this
i hope i am being transparent in implying you are mentally ill and making it worse by screaming about this and trying to normalize your inner-thoughts to others.
you might even have a touch of the 'tism if you regularly assume your thoughts/feelings are universal.
yikes bestie who hurt you??
>One of the most respected research groups showed that the average american is somewhat split on the issue but the majority do support transfolks and those with democratic leanings overwhemingly support us.
No they didn't, and even if they had, like I said
>we have researched ourselves and determined things are the way we say they are
You're moronic, and the moment you pull out of America, your belief system becomes even less accepted. There's 8 billion people on the planet and at least 7 billion of those people would consider you a mentally ill freak. Only the most moronic people in America, Canada and a few European countries accept you.
Again, you stupid goddamned homosexual, virtue signaling does NOT provide an accurate representation of how people actually feel. Most people think you and your are a freak and will be cold and distant toward you, but they don’t want other people to think they’re buttholes, so they’ll claim that they support your right to express yourself how you wish.
I don’t even know why I’m bothering to explain this to you— you’ll inevitably collapse under the weight of your own delusion and have a nice day anyway. Enjoy it while it lasts you creep.
anon, most people don't think about this stuff at all.
they certainly don't scream into the void of Cinemaphile about it.
>as long as they stay the hell away from me then I don’t care what they do
This is the general mental framework for the person who believes in letting people do whatever makes them happy, and I’d be a liar if I didn’t say I was one of them. Unfortunately trannies want validation, which is not the same as “live and let live”.
>Unfortunately trannies want validation
they can't force you to give it to them.
>call me my pronouns or get cancelled
you are in no danger of being "canceled."
hahaha you must think you're acting very calm and smart by talking like this, like a child trying to get out of trouble by being pedantic
you know what he's talking about moron, don't pretend you don't
>it will never happen
>it is happening, but only to some people (we are here)
>it is happening often, get used to it
>it happens to you
Unless you're Canadian.
No, but the reason we are having this discussion is because despite how absurd it is, they try to do just about anything to force other people to feed them the validation they so desperately crave. It’s sustenance for them, and they can’t get it without getting other, physically/mentally sound people to give it to them.
Nah, that other Anon was right. Everyone sneers and talks about you behind your backs. Its this way in schools, in workplaces, and in families. People always talk.
nah, most people don't really concern themselves with the lives of others.
This is correct insofar as normal white people (ie proto white nationalists) actively do not want to know what degenerates like you get up to in private, or what you believe; but when you make yourself public, when you interact with the institutions of the state, when you try to inject yourself into children's lives, that's when it stops being about you and starts being about them, and that's when they react with disgust. Honestly whites are the most tolerant people on earth, because they'd let you live your entire life in an asylum using whatever pronouns you like, instead of burning you alive in the streets like they do in Africa and South America. But you're going for broke and you're going to reap what you're sowing.
Everyone on planet Earth concerns themselves with the lives of others. We've been gossiping, talking shit, wondering, asking, conversing, advancing, postulating and philosophizing with each other since the beginning of language.
Even a casual glance at real people will tell you that you are wrong. People simply take the path of least resistance - that's usually being polite on the surface and keeping the nasty words for places behind someone's back.
Its the same in every era, in every culture across history. The only thing we all agree on intrinsically is that every other human being alive is potential competition.
>inb4 But I don't agree!
Then you must have something wrong with you. I can't be responsible for your skill issues at being alive.
You are mostly correct, although I will add that you can extend a feeling of non-competition to close friends and family.
you know people always normalize their behavior as common, right?
Yeah, because more often than not, it is. We are all still humans at the end of the day, after all. And even though we have our quirks, the fundamental behaviors are similar across time and cultures.
ever heard of confirmation bias?
Yeah, but I don’t see how what I’m saying is evidence of that.
you don't see how your confirmation bias is literally a confirmation bias?
ever heard of cognitive dissonance?
Sounds like you're the one obsessed with trannies, 99% of the country honestly don't care and would rather just let people be happy.
yeah all those young morons that go through surgery and then kill themselves when they realize what they did are very happy
you don't seem able to differentiate between vast unconcerned majorities and tiny motivated minorities
>43%
And just like the people in the documentary, those people only support you because they don't want to hurt your feelings.
If gender and sex are two different things, and you decide your gender is female, guess what biological sex you still are genius? I'll give you a hint: you have trillions of chromosomes in your body from this sex.
This is why no one in the documentary will say what a women is, they're stopping just short of saying what everybody; your doctors, your parents, your friends, your body, and YOU know: YOU ARE A BIOLOGICAL MALE.
>TRANSRIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS
>ARE YOU TRANSPHOBIC? HUH HUH?
>YOU CAN'T SAY THINGS LIKE THAT IT'S TRANSPHOBIC
>CANADA HAS LAWS THAT CRIMINALIZE MISGENDERING, WOW THEY ARE THE GOOD GUYS
>OH MY GOD HAVE YOU WATCHED EUPHORIA? THAT TRANSGIRL HAS SUCH A SAD STORY!
>Okay, here's our survey, can you tell us how you feel about how greater acceptance of transgender people is good for society? Please put your name and phone number and address too.
>YOU ARE IN THE MINORITY DEAL WITH IT.
Translation:
>The peaceful democratic process is unavailable to you; proceed accordingly.
Ok
Support how?
Yes normal people are now white nationalists, so embrace it
oy vey!!
It's still the average view Americans have today.
You're going to trigger the troonynazi bot
So, you chose moronation.
You dumb c**ts associate every single oppositional viewpoint as white nationalism, or white supremacy. It's really lazy, really dishonest, and really fricking stupid. 41% yourself.
>If I was making a documentary on trannies, I wouldn't ask "what is a woman?", I'd start with premise that there's no such thing as trans, period
No one asked you. Asking the people that champion the idea of gender being fluid to define their words is the entire point. Seeing them get flustered when you ask for the truth, not "their truth" but THE truth. Going around yelling YWNBAW is just confrontational and gets you nowhere
giving dangerous, cancer inducing chemicals to trans kids is a left ideology
sounds right
>The white nationalist view on trannies is that they're insane peverted men larping as women
That's the view of everyone on planet earth except for American leftists.
>The white nationalist view on trannies is that they're insane peverted men larping as women.
I think that's just the view on trannies held by 90%+ of the modern world. Most asians, blacks and brown people would straight up tell you as much, some would kill you for suggesting otherwise. It's actually mostly ~~*white*~~ people who push this troony shit.
I'm not white and i agree with this definition of trannies
You've internalized white supremacy.
> The white nationalist view on trannies is that they're insane peverted men larping as women
Nope, that’s the normal view of any sane person. You get the same answer if you ask Asians, Africans, Indians, South Americans, etc.
Sounds like white nationalism is based. How do I sign up as a non white?
Checked
White nationalism is based.
Not wanting 6 years to be put on puberty blockers and told they can be whatever gender or species they want is obviously very white nationalist
>Not cutting your dick off in 2022? You might as well be murdering israelites in the street!
Why dont mind if i do
it is tho
This has nothing to do with race in any way, shape, or form. Shut up moron.
troony mod is angee and deleting these threads watch out
I would love to interview that wolf identifying homosexual. My question would be
>If you are a wolf how come I could kill you very easily with my bare hands?
Can’t someone take away that mod’s privileges? They’re literally banning threads about television on the television board.
This is the first time I’ve seen Matt Walsh on video and I must say I never noticed how israeli he looks.
he's literally Wil Wheaton just with different brain damage
What about the argument that women are the ones responsible for bearing and birthing children? You can’t call yourself a woman if you can’t perform the biggest responsibility of the female human form.
They will say WAA WHAT ABOUT WOMEN THAT CANT GIVE BIRTH BIGOT!
Malfunctioning women
WAAA WHAT HOW COULD YOU BE SO MEAN! ALL WOMEN ARE PERFECT AND BEAUTFUL YOU INCEL CHUD!
but anon, what about women that cant give birth!
Well, they’re free to call themselves whatever they like after that, but they sure as hell aren’t functioning women.
I have a (biologically) female friend with an extremely fertile body that can't have kids. If you want to go down that road you can but all it does is damage actual women in the crossfire.
size of boobs?
>with an extremely fertile body
mmmmm giv to daddy
Theres a difference between the principle and incidental. Women can bear children in principle, let alen keyes explain.
Some people are born with only one arm? Would it be wrong of me to describe humans as a species that are born with two arms
it is a husk masquerading as a woman. be not deceived.
Why do jannies keep deleting threads about this documentary?
Truth.
they are seething and dilating
Sean Pean in Carlitos WY
jannies are trannies, what's new?
you know why
So troonyism is propped up because every mentally ill kid can be convinced to buy a buncha drugs and undergo expensive surgeries?
lmao
not the same thing as the trans issue
waitaminute
>Russia invades Ukraine
>Covid and Monkey virus
>School now literally teach kids about dildos and sex
>Taliban control Afghanistan
This image is just incorrect
Actually the shit that was predicted is happening now. Funny how that works out
Is the joke that all those things happened/will happen?
It was posted on Reddit 10 years ago.
The sad reality is that all of those things did/are happening.
>we win
oh sweet, man made horrors beyond my comprehension
>yfw evangelicals undersold how bad it would get once globohomosexual took over
So, the religious nuts were right all along.
always
accept god. accept jesus
>terrorists literally take over afganistan
>they teach gay sex in schools (except florida in under 4th grade)
Aw shucks time to fix the pie chart. Damn i want some pie
It's just a man in a Halloween costume entertaining kids, it's not like he's a demonic sex offender or something jeez...
is the joke that the man in the picture is in fact a sex offender?
Yes, this is the joke. Twice this has been done, and twice it has been found out after the fact that these organizations have allowed previously-convicted sex offenders into a classroom to read books to small children.
There's a number of cases that the men who show up to "perform" drag queen story hour or whatever have previous convictions as sex offenders with minors. That image, specifically is from one of those--that's an outreach event hosted by libraries. Mostly arranged by white neoliberal women.
The other anon is incorrect in that it's mostly teachers pushing some of the lgbtq+ and identification stuff in schools. I'd like to believe that guests on the premises actually have a little bit of a background run before being let loose around children, but who knows at this point.
A little out of order. but it checks out.
do babies really have orgasms?
This dude’s a gay but the dishonest editing was too much. Also the filmmaker seems like a douche
How about this hot take:
A man is a person who has to burden the responsibility of doing hard and dangerous things. A woman, on the other hand, does not.
For all intents and purposes, feminists are men and transvestites are women. Trannies run from and expect to be protected from their troubles whereas feminists engage them directly.
What a fricking plonker.
You know, all this LGBTQ shit does is get really, really stupid people kill themselves and their offspring. I think I can get on board with that.
>all this LGBTQ shit does
It does a lot more than that, like ruin my kinos with gay shit
Until they start putting the mind virus into little kids, fricking blues clues had a troony parade or something recently.
If your kids would prefer to embrace values from Blue’s Clues instead of from their parents, then you have failed.
Because no child has ever gone against their parents wishes ever in their life. Just in this case the rebellion will cause permanent damage and suicide as a result, but totally the same as becoming a goth for a year or something.
The good news is that it’s virtually impossible for kids to get on hormonal therapy until they’re 18. If pop culture manages to do a better job of convincing them to chemically/physically castrate themselves then you do at trying to prevent it, then too bad.
There was literally a case discussed on this very documentary about a 13 year old given chemical castration drugs against her fathers wishes in which he was jailed for.
How did the kid gain access to the drug, let alone administer it to themselves properly?
hospital gave it to her, holy shit just watch the thing instead of arguing like a moron
I refuse to give views to anyone who espouses hate and bigotry and wish more people here would do the same.
I’ll watch it later, I’m just baffled by how the kid received that kind of medication without their parent’s consent and somehow the parent was punished for it. It’s not supposed to work that way.
naive complacent leftist parents who look at the state of America today and fail to see the problem or take any precautions against it, people like this got us into this situation in the first place
They're punishing parents for trying to protect their kids.
>so who came up with this?
>JOHN MONEY
>and why
>PUBLISH OR PERISH
this person browses Cinemaphile
He doesn't just browse Cinemaphile
He's Janny
Man why do all documentaries fail in some regard. 32 minutes in, he's doing a fricking montage of troony athletes dominating female divisions instead of providing raw data that men genetically are stronger than women etc. Frick it's frustrating.
because its funnier to set the montage to the guy trying to say being trans isn't an advantage.
Less convincing and less able to blow the frick out naysayers like the fat homosexual he's interviewing as the montage is going. But sure it's funny haha.
... what would you have preferred? what data-points do you think would've been utterly inarguable to people who's entire existence is a losing argument with reality?
Actually normal people aren't convinced by data. I thought the juxtaposition of the guys words with the video of women getting dominated by masquerading men was great. Poignant.
I guess I'm just to intelligent because I was sitting there waiting for data instead of cherry picked footage. For the record I agree with what the documentarian is doing so far.
Data on what? You seem to have completely missed the point of the documentary.
They should have cut the whole trans athlete part. The fat brown man was right, most trannies fail at sports, it's just a bunch of dudes dressing up as ladies and ruining it for everyone.
Anyway, who gives a shit about women's sports?
>most trannies fail at sports
got a single fact to back that up?
Have you guys ever seen a troony? They aren't the athletic type.
Those dudes just grow out their hair because they have bad sportmanship and want to smash all the female athletes. And again, why does it matter? Female sports are a joke, women deserve to have a bunch of larpers beat them at volleyball.
>why does it matter
it came up because people kept saying there were no differences between men and women. there are. they are pretty sizable at a casual level and become more and more pronounced at a competitive level.
of course the fat moron was harping about the idea if trans is a sports advantage or not unto itself, because he wasn't (properly) trapped into saying there were no major physical differences between men and women.
See:
Hit the nail on the head, particularly:
>he wasn't (properly) trapped into saying there were no major physical differences between men and women.
>most trannies fail at sports
Again, where is the data??
DATA
This doc is made for mouth breathing daily wire subs so they can circle jerk with each other. I mean it's pretty well made but it comes across as a black comedy more than an informative documentary. It's kind of sad; most people will laugh about it and then move on with their lives but all this insane and demonic shit will keep happening. It's already too late tbh. The conservatives meant well when they said they just wanted to be left alone and let people live how they want to live. I miss Hitler.
What is a woman?
>What do you think is a woman?
What is a woman?
>Why do you want to know that?
What is a woman?
>You're being very transphobic and possibly antisemitic at this point
What is a woman?
>My years of gender studies have not prepared me for this question
95 percent or more of trannies are casualties of a psychic war of worldview and should be viewed as such but boy i sure am glad that i am a poor peckerwood living in the sticks so i never have to deal with these things
I would love to keep treating them with kid gloves but they have been turned into foot soldiers for the psychic war and they're rapidly gaining ground. They were never going to have normal lives again so might as well just try and have them face the truth rather than trying to get them help that they'll never accept.
anon anyone who falls for this crap is being sterilized.
You don't have to tell me that.
the documetnary had a good half hour somewhere in the middle. then the tiktok montage started.
>first surgeon describes troony surgery (positively) as a "bit of a Faustian bargain"
accurate but for none of the reasons they said it.
they are kinda up front about the fact it won't be possible to have children afterwards.
>animated
...what?!??
Video shows that troonyism is rooted in modern academia and their rejection of European ideas like objectivism
Academia doesn't exist. This guy isn't an academic. I bet he doesn't understand any foundational scientific theories.
>objectivism
objectivity. objectivism refers two two unrelated topics.
What a tragedy.
The voice changed girl in the dark. You can still see her face. Her head shape would still be easily identified. At least give her a hat.
>what sexual orientation? I see a dick!
lmao
>watch documentary
>learn nothing new
really seems like he only made this to distribute all the big speeches he gave that no one saw.
>gender is vague
Come on now, Peterson. Gender isn't vague. Gender refers to sex.
>half the posts ITT are just 5 r*ddit sissies completely off their rocker arguing with anyone and everything
This is what estradiol does to a man.