I can see someone saying some parts were okay, but not the whole film, the whole thing was trash that seemed to be frame work for like 3 well written scenes
I have to disagree, that over long and direction as you call it made the film stale, and the breasts made it feel cheap.
2 years ago
Anonymous
There is nothing wrong with nudity in films, unless you are an American
2 years ago
Anonymous
I don't have a problem with breasts, but it felt like it was try to distract that it had very little substance
2 years ago
Anonymous
breasts are only distraction to coomers, there is very little sexual appeal in the whole film so it cant distract since it does nothing.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Exactly, but I got the impression that the director was so incompetent that he thought he had to shine a flashy toy to a 13 year old when it was thin and embarrassing
it's okay. it's at least strange and striking so i think it will be one of those movies people keep coming back to and "reappraising" over the years instead of forgetting forever as soon as the marketing push ends. there is a concentrated effort by twitter feminists to suppress it in that manipulative "there is something wrong with you if you like this" kind of way that comes off as particularly desperate because they know the movie has a strong vision that can't be easily dismissed.
>it will be one of those movies people keep coming back to and "reappraising" over the years instead of forgetting forever as soon as the marketing push ends
So like The Assassination of Jesse James then. This director is very good at those kinds of movies.
Lol this movie is literally Modern Women, sadface abortions, disassociation used after adding "bodies" and having orgies, crawling after rich men they don't know, posing for cameras, and then hitting walls on pills
yes, it is a good movie. most of the complains you can find is people saying that it showed the "wrong parts of Monroe's life".
it's an interesting view on trauma and mental illness, sprinkled with bits of Hollywood as an exploitative (of people) industry.
People just can't take that it's not a complete whitewash.
Yes, it's Marilyn MKUltra. And the aesthetics are valium to Lurman's Elvis' speed. The big problem with Blonde is that Ana has terrible breasts. Have they deflated? But it's possible Dominik hates Monroe so much that he wanted to use mediocre breasts and not even joking. He fricking hates the b***h. It's hilarious. And doomerpilled. homosexuals itts keep saying cringe but Hollywood Cringe is the theme
It is psychological drama/nightmare told in vignettes, a bit like Lynch with Mulholland Dr or Fire Walk With Me but the style is more all over the place and maximalist. The main objections are that the film focuses on depressive episodes and doesnt show how empowering and intelligent Monroe was (which is not true, but the film is not full of it, which is what some morons want) and some abortion stuff which makes some people seethe due to politics for some reason. It is good, but not great. He should have cut it down more or added more varied stuff.
Light switch brain from Crit. unfortunately. Monroe's private life was as low and lower than shown. Armas' is the first believable portrayal that hasn't been a Disneyficated fairy tale.
>He should have cut it down more or added more varied stuff.
More obliquely suggestive stuff. The Kennedy(s) material is absolutely nuclear. + Rat Pack.
This.
It's also like a feminist snuff film; where every man is a rapist; and everyone woman is absolved of any responsibility for their lives.
Meanwhile; it's shot in vignettes, like anon said, [...] ; but those aren't based on truth; but on the public/tabloid perception of things. Clear example are the first scenes in her bedroom; where the color balanced is messed with to foreshadow the bad contrast on the death photo of her in bed.
Meanwhile, the "crazy/troubled hot woman" meme was never any fun; and is far less popular than it was decades ago. You'd have to have been insane to date someone like her; let alone let her into your life
>It's also like a feminist snuff film; where every man is a rapist
That's the biz., it's always been the biz. And as hackneyed and overplayed out as this bete noir has become, in Monroe case it absolutely conformed to that stereotype.
[...] >Also most people probably went into it expecting a biopic and thats absolutely not what it is, if you dont already know the basic events of Monroes life then you wont learn much more from this film.
Zoomers please kys. You want a history lesson watch a fricking YT documentary. The point is there is no point to Monroe. The director did an interview that went viral because he said "Everyone loves Monroe but no one has even watched her movies, because they're not good and she's not a good actress," and then the feminist interview says Ahem, Gentlemen Like Blondes is a movie I watch and drink wine to with my feminist book club! and the director laughs at her. The movie isn't a history lesson it's experiential, she was just a dumb fricked up b***h stumbling out of beds like she was falling down silver clouds and then she died or was murdered even the director doesn't care.
This is the biggest L women have taken in movies in a long time.
>hen she died or was murdered even the director doesn't care.
There's the weakness of it. Monroe had the kind of access to Golden Age Hollywood that has heavy symbolic value in the American mythos; the Kennedys (and Sinatra/mob) associations only further it. This is in the wake of Watergate, Fall of Saigon, Johnson carpetbagging his predecessor's achievements, recession ... a movie like this needed to be an archetypal gut punch to & indictment of Boomer Americana, its misuse and abuse, on multiple levels especially to the "hot mess" one for Gen X and foward women & Lana Del Rey-sim
i saw the relevant scenes and they should have gone further with the threesome, maybe a graphic double penetration
blowjob was a waste of film too, the dick should have been visible
nice nipples though so 2,5/5
The issue is the film has like zero fricking plot. Also most people probably went into it expecting a biopic and thats absolutely not what it is, if you dont already know the basic events of Monroes life then you wont learn much more from this film. The movie just kind of goes from event to event. For example early in the movie you see her as a young child getting dropped off at an orphanage. And the next scene she is already Marilyn Monroe about to suck and frick herself to fame. The rest of the film does this same sort of stuff.
It's also like a feminist snuff film; where every man is a rapist; and everyone woman is absolved of any responsibility for their lives.
Meanwhile; it's shot in vignettes, like anon said,
It is psychological drama/nightmare told in vignettes, a bit like Lynch with Mulholland Dr or Fire Walk With Me but the style is more all over the place and maximalist. The main objections are that the film focuses on depressive episodes and doesnt show how empowering and intelligent Monroe was (which is not true, but the film is not full of it, which is what some morons want) and some abortion stuff which makes some people seethe due to politics for some reason. It is good, but not great. He should have cut it down more or added more varied stuff.
; but those aren't based on truth; but on the public/tabloid perception of things. Clear example are the first scenes in her bedroom; where the color balanced is messed with to foreshadow the bad contrast on the death photo of her in bed.
Meanwhile, the "crazy/troubled hot woman" meme was never any fun; and is far less popular than it was decades ago. You'd have to have been insane to date someone like her; let alone let her into your life
It's also like a feminist snuff film; where every man is a rapist; and everyone woman is absolved of any responsibility for their lives.
Meanwhile; it's shot in vignettes, like anon said, [...] ; but those aren't based on truth; but on the public/tabloid perception of things. Clear example are the first scenes in her bedroom; where the color balanced is messed with to foreshadow the bad contrast on the death photo of her in bed.
Meanwhile, the "crazy/troubled hot woman" meme was never any fun; and is far less popular than it was decades ago. You'd have to have been insane to date someone like her; let alone let her into your life
>Also most people probably went into it expecting a biopic and thats absolutely not what it is, if you dont already know the basic events of Monroes life then you wont learn much more from this film.
Zoomers please kys. You want a history lesson watch a fricking YT documentary. The point is there is no point to Monroe. The director did an interview that went viral because he said "Everyone loves Monroe but no one has even watched her movies, because they're not good and she's not a good actress," and then the feminist interview says Ahem, Gentlemen Like Blondes is a movie I watch and drink wine to with my feminist book club! and the director laughs at her. The movie isn't a history lesson it's experiential, she was just a dumb fricked up b***h stumbling out of beds like she was falling down silver clouds and then she died or was murdered even the director doesn't care.
This is the biggest L women have taken in movies in a long time.
lol Critical Drinker. I used to enjoy his takes on film/TV but he's really just turned into a giant manbaby who can't stop whining about women and social justice nonsense
It's a re imagining of an actual person. They literally made shit up about her actual life without hard proof that it even happened. How they thought this would be a good thing is beyond me. They should have just cast a black actress in the lead and have her frick dogs on camera.
It was alright. It felt kinda like masturbatory trauma porn at times. Probably could’ve cut down the amount of cgi fetus shots a little, and I think the way they portrayed Norma Jeane/Marilyn Monroe felt a little shallow. But the main performance was really good and it was a very well shot movie.
Probably would’ve been better if he got maybe one other person to help him write it.
Wow is that a vaguely non-mainstream milqutoast opinion that still operates 100% within the mainstream censorsphere with absolutely zero actual edge? wtf I literally can't stop consooming.
Blonde was an amazing movie. The acting from Xavier, Anna de arms, husband 1 and 2. All of it was good,
It looked amazing, the switch between mono to coloured, showing manroe physique, on top of the other affects, was amazing.
The way it shot in the latter part of the film, to show how alone she was. Amazing.
The only complaint was that it ran a bit to long.
Even if it’s not historical accurate, she was a drug addicted b***h. They all where. It’s 50s and 60s Hollywood. What the frick do you expect from this?
You think cute girls in the 50s trying to move up in the world didn’t suck and frick?
People who give negative reviews didn’t know/want a movie that is darker in tone.
>she was a drug addicted b***h. They all where. It’s 50s and 60s Hollywood. What the frick do you expect from this?
I think one of the concerns people that didn't like the film have with it not being historically accurate is people like you thinking exactly what you described as a result of seeing this movie. You said yourself you understood the movie wasn't historically accurate, but then in that same sentence proceed to discuss it as if it was. This isn't by any means the main criticism most people have with the movie, but I do think the fact that it reinforces the false opinions of dumb asses like yourself is definitely an additional good reason to think it's garbage
what does this marvelshitter fricking know about psychological dramas lmao
So, was it good then?
idk
It is good but flawed, still better than 99% of mutt bilge that gets released.
I can see someone saying some parts were okay, but not the whole film, the whole thing was trash that seemed to be frame work for like 3 well written scenes
Most of it is good, just overlong and overdirected to the point of formal nonsense
I have to disagree, that over long and direction as you call it made the film stale, and the breasts made it feel cheap.
There is nothing wrong with nudity in films, unless you are an American
I don't have a problem with breasts, but it felt like it was try to distract that it had very little substance
breasts are only distraction to coomers, there is very little sexual appeal in the whole film so it cant distract since it does nothing.
Exactly, but I got the impression that the director was so incompetent that he thought he had to shine a flashy toy to a 13 year old when it was thin and embarrassing
Don't you see her snatch at some point?
Yeah, not porn level pussy shot, but yeah
it's okay. it's at least strange and striking so i think it will be one of those movies people keep coming back to and "reappraising" over the years instead of forgetting forever as soon as the marketing push ends. there is a concentrated effort by twitter feminists to suppress it in that manipulative "there is something wrong with you if you like this" kind of way that comes off as particularly desperate because they know the movie has a strong vision that can't be easily dismissed.
>it will be one of those movies people keep coming back to and "reappraising" over the years instead of forgetting forever as soon as the marketing push ends
So like The Assassination of Jesse James then. This director is very good at those kinds of movies.
Lol this movie is literally Modern Women, sadface abortions, disassociation used after adding "bodies" and having orgies, crawling after rich men they don't know, posing for cameras, and then hitting walls on pills
>there is a concentrated effort by twitter feminists to suppress it
when will you gays stop falling for manufactured outrage marketing
yes, it is a good movie. most of the complains you can find is people saying that it showed the "wrong parts of Monroe's life".
it's an interesting view on trauma and mental illness, sprinkled with bits of Hollywood as an exploitative (of people) industry.
People just can't take that it's not a complete whitewash.
It's Dominik's worst film but its still decent
Yes, it's Marilyn MKUltra. And the aesthetics are valium to Lurman's Elvis' speed. The big problem with Blonde is that Ana has terrible breasts. Have they deflated? But it's possible Dominik hates Monroe so much that he wanted to use mediocre breasts and not even joking. He fricking hates the b***h. It's hilarious. And doomerpilled. homosexuals itts keep saying cringe but Hollywood Cringe is the theme
It's fake
It doesn't sound like a very enjoyable movie to watch
Will RLM review Blonde?
It will be Jay and Beardfat not Mike or Rich
Drinker and critical film watcher here. What, Druk starring Mads Mikkelsen one of my favorite actors in a movie about alcohol? Never heard of it.
Is it kino? The more I see people seethe about it makes me think it is.
It is psychological drama/nightmare told in vignettes, a bit like Lynch with Mulholland Dr or Fire Walk With Me but the style is more all over the place and maximalist. The main objections are that the film focuses on depressive episodes and doesnt show how empowering and intelligent Monroe was (which is not true, but the film is not full of it, which is what some morons want) and some abortion stuff which makes some people seethe due to politics for some reason. It is good, but not great. He should have cut it down more or added more varied stuff.
I thought it was just a simple Marilyn Monroe biopic
No, it indulges in plenty of fiction and speculation and the style is the opposite of conventional safe biopics. It is based on a fiction book.
Light switch brain from Crit. unfortunately. Monroe's private life was as low and lower than shown. Armas' is the first believable portrayal that hasn't been a Disneyficated fairy tale.
>He should have cut it down more or added more varied stuff.
More obliquely suggestive stuff. The Kennedy(s) material is absolutely nuclear. + Rat Pack.
>It's also like a feminist snuff film; where every man is a rapist
That's the biz., it's always been the biz. And as hackneyed and overplayed out as this bete noir has become, in Monroe case it absolutely conformed to that stereotype.
>hen she died or was murdered even the director doesn't care.
There's the weakness of it. Monroe had the kind of access to Golden Age Hollywood that has heavy symbolic value in the American mythos; the Kennedys (and Sinatra/mob) associations only further it. This is in the wake of Watergate, Fall of Saigon, Johnson carpetbagging his predecessor's achievements, recession ... a movie like this needed to be an archetypal gut punch to & indictment of Boomer Americana, its misuse and abuse, on multiple levels especially to the "hot mess" one for Gen X and foward women & Lana Del Rey-sim
The fact that the worst people on both sides dislike it tells me that this is a genuinely great movie.
If you like Twin Peaks, you'll enjoy Blonde. Critical Drinker is a moron. Idk we he or even RLM gets spammed.
i saw the relevant scenes and they should have gone further with the threesome, maybe a graphic double penetration
blowjob was a waste of film too, the dick should have been visible
nice nipples though so 2,5/5
Should have been nut on her face too
Kernode liked it
The issue is the film has like zero fricking plot. Also most people probably went into it expecting a biopic and thats absolutely not what it is, if you dont already know the basic events of Monroes life then you wont learn much more from this film. The movie just kind of goes from event to event. For example early in the movie you see her as a young child getting dropped off at an orphanage. And the next scene she is already Marilyn Monroe about to suck and frick herself to fame. The rest of the film does this same sort of stuff.
This.
It's also like a feminist snuff film; where every man is a rapist; and everyone woman is absolved of any responsibility for their lives.
Meanwhile; it's shot in vignettes, like anon said,
; but those aren't based on truth; but on the public/tabloid perception of things. Clear example are the first scenes in her bedroom; where the color balanced is messed with to foreshadow the bad contrast on the death photo of her in bed.
Meanwhile, the "crazy/troubled hot woman" meme was never any fun; and is far less popular than it was decades ago. You'd have to have been insane to date someone like her; let alone let her into your life
>Also most people probably went into it expecting a biopic and thats absolutely not what it is, if you dont already know the basic events of Monroes life then you wont learn much more from this film.
Zoomers please kys. You want a history lesson watch a fricking YT documentary. The point is there is no point to Monroe. The director did an interview that went viral because he said "Everyone loves Monroe but no one has even watched her movies, because they're not good and she's not a good actress," and then the feminist interview says Ahem, Gentlemen Like Blondes is a movie I watch and drink wine to with my feminist book club! and the director laughs at her. The movie isn't a history lesson it's experiential, she was just a dumb fricked up b***h stumbling out of beds like she was falling down silver clouds and then she died or was murdered even the director doesn't care.
This is the biggest L women have taken in movies in a long time.
>no one has even watched her movies
I've seen All About Eve and Some Like it Hot she was in those.
>movie dunks on libs with its shitty depiction of JFK and its anti abortion messaging
Yeah im thinking its based
lol Critical Drinker. I used to enjoy his takes on film/TV but he's really just turned into a giant manbaby who can't stop whining about women and social justice nonsense
>why is a film critic criticising things that make movies objectively shit and which keep constantly reappearing in modern media
hmm what a pondering to be had
Post starfish
why is it 2h30m long?
>why is it 2h30m long?
>over 2 hours
im not gonna watch this
yeah i like watching tiktok more too
Who knows? I'll never see it.
I'm just glad the movie about Thot Jesus failed.
we'll let you know once the morons start posting her nude shots on here
I heard there’s a scene where she shits on herself
it's about a tri-hole.
It's a re imagining of an actual person. They literally made shit up about her actual life without hard proof that it even happened. How they thought this would be a good thing is beyond me. They should have just cast a black actress in the lead and have her frick dogs on camera.
No really wtf did she mean by this
Joyce is a uggo who can't relate with Marilyn's hottie struggles is what she means.
It was alright. It felt kinda like masturbatory trauma porn at times. Probably could’ve cut down the amount of cgi fetus shots a little, and I think the way they portrayed Norma Jeane/Marilyn Monroe felt a little shallow. But the main performance was really good and it was a very well shot movie.
Probably would’ve been better if he got maybe one other person to help him write it.
will watch as its upsetting the alphabet people
This tbh
I'm prepared for it to be trash but I'm also prepared for it to just be upsetting and challenging which usually sets those people off
Are these white trash offshoots still doing "here's how I would do it" reviews and there's still audience for that?
people thought this was going to be good?
it's not even a decent coom material
It is good and yes because a good director did it.
Wow is that a vaguely non-mainstream milqutoast opinion that still operates 100% within the mainstream censorsphere with absolutely zero actual edge? wtf I literally can't stop consooming.
Blonde was an amazing movie. The acting from Xavier, Anna de arms, husband 1 and 2. All of it was good,
It looked amazing, the switch between mono to coloured, showing manroe physique, on top of the other affects, was amazing.
The way it shot in the latter part of the film, to show how alone she was. Amazing.
The only complaint was that it ran a bit to long.
Even if it’s not historical accurate, she was a drug addicted b***h. They all where. It’s 50s and 60s Hollywood. What the frick do you expect from this?
You think cute girls in the 50s trying to move up in the world didn’t suck and frick?
People who give negative reviews didn’t know/want a movie that is darker in tone.
>she was a drug addicted b***h. They all where. It’s 50s and 60s Hollywood. What the frick do you expect from this?
I think one of the concerns people that didn't like the film have with it not being historically accurate is people like you thinking exactly what you described as a result of seeing this movie. You said yourself you understood the movie wasn't historically accurate, but then in that same sentence proceed to discuss it as if it was. This isn't by any means the main criticism most people have with the movie, but I do think the fact that it reinforces the false opinions of dumb asses like yourself is definitely an additional good reason to think it's garbage