Yes, but for the wrong reasons. Star Wars only works because George Lucas was an extremely knowledgeable artist creating genuine art. That's why when anyone else tries to do something with the setting it results in trash. It's because they fundamentally misunderstood Star Wars.
true very true
I just wish lucas knew how to put is foot down.
Sadly the star wars universe does't make sense the harder you try to make sense of it.
jedis,force,empire,rebel,science none of makes sense when examining the universe of star wars
That guy's entire channel boils down to "George Lucas uses the vehicle of Star Wars to generate a series of homages to scenes George watched as a kid. Therefore, George is a genius- because he's copied film shots and modified iconic film lines from the 1940's and 1950's for modern audiences."
Basically, his entire argument boils down to George Lucas has nothing original to say, he only remakes scenes and uses lines from other people's work in a whacky Sci Fi universe made to sell toys- and this makes him a super genius. His video about RLM and Stuckmann and other reviewers is correct, but on everything else he's a fricking moron.
He was okay. Movie was fun at least and was the best thing Disney was able to accomplish. Didn't overstay its welcome. Would've watched a sequel tho. Better than Rogue One.
It is if we talk about how Disney has handled it. Lucas was smart enough to realize that the first three films needed a distinct feel from the originals, even though they all look kinda shit every place the characters go to is unique. There's the city planet, the water planet, the jungle planet, and the red bug desert planet. On that latter point geonosis is kind of a lame stand-in for tatooine, but Dooku's performance sells it as the whole area feels inhuman and unsafe.
If Disney was smart, the sequel trilogy would have been on three different planets which would have stopped the plot from sprawling out and forced a larger focus on the characters. I don't think anyone knows or cares about dantooine but they could have shot it cheaply in Colorado and have it be the same story of someone irrelevant becoming meaningful. Which would have been a carbon copy of Luke's and Anakin's stories but the change in atmosphere/sets would have tricked the audience. And this would have permitted them to do the 9th film in an evil nazi planet where it's just nu-wolfenstien and hurr durr orange man bad etc (but done well and in a way that's at least interesting to watch).
What fails is the execution. A good production staff could have done something that wasn't boring, convoluted or just plain messy. Especially with the transition from Ryan to JJ, there's no cohesive plot and nothing makes sense so good ideas aren't built on and everything feels useless. Which it is because ultimately it's just a paid, disposable product.
Mike thinks Empire Strikes Back is one of the greatest movies ever. Ghostbusters, Empire, Tremors and Rocketeer.
When they talked about the Rocketeer they thought it was perfect aside from the cleavage
What? The main character is a bounty hunder who is basically like Boba Fett except his armor looks different and he's protecting a kid who is literally just a baby version of Yoda. The villain is empire shits again and they go to tattooine even though its a completely backwaters planet.
>Then Disney saw it was the underdog compared to the shit trilogy, and hijacked it for all 12 spin offs that will be coming out in 2 months intervals.
Nah, Filoni and Favreau wanted to build their own Star Wars shared universe.
Other then Luke, most of the pre-existing characters they put into Mandalorian were all Mandalorian or adjacent to Mandalore stories, which makes sense with the show being a normie introduction to Mandos and Mando lore.
Depends. It is extremely limited by all of its technology being hand-wave magic without even an attempt on setting up some kind limit on what is and isn't technologically possible, how expensive it is to push certain limits technologically versus others and of system of possible logistics that supports the rest of it it is hard to create any interesting narratives that are a result of the social pressures and conditions that these factors will shape.
>When the entire story revolves around people from the OT and happens on planets that we saw or that were mentioned in the OT.
Yes but there is a lot more to the movies than just those things. It's a prequel story so of course it will revolve around some of the same characters but they introduce a ton of new ones, new locations, new tech, etc. etc.
The Mandalorian showed it isn't, but they instantly fricked it up by making it all about the jedi again.
And even the force could be interesting if they approached it like in KOTOR II, but Disney isn't smart enough to think long term, even if their soijak fans stop buying their product they won't bother innovating.
They just pump out content based on recent demographics, which are probably generated through social media activity. This means the core process of making films is dictated by twitter and reddit which is mostly bot farms. They cater to a demographic that does not exist.
I know, and you'd think they'd be able to see that already, but for whatever reason all big corpos don't understand Twitter doesn't equal sales, they look at numbers in a way that makes it seem like they don't know what's a human.
Baby Yoda may have worked as a nice lil' extra if it had stuck to the Wolf and Cub formula maybe with a Cowboy Bebop style episodic stories and as you say not involve the empire, season 2 adds in more things about the force and familiar faces once again, I think it's better than season 1, but it dooms the series to keep on going with the same tired formula of the force being the center point of everything.
Rich is completely right about the force and space magic being boring because it excuses away everything, if only they went the route of KOTOR II it could actually make for a good story by showing how monstruous the idea of fate and cycles actually is in that universe.
The way things have been handled so far, kind of. >Thousands of different worlds, but we only see a small handful or places that are practically indistinguishable from the well-known ones >Everything connects to the same handful of characters in some way
It all serves to make the universe seem kind of shallow and limited.
You could literally tell any kind of story in Star Wars. There is nothing technically off limits and there's all kinds of stories out there. That doesn't mean Disney will greenlight everything. Even Obi-Wan's old writer said he used biblical references and the new writer just made a surface level israelite during WW2 tier parallels. I would unironically pay to watch Obi-wan sitting in the desert dealing with his exile and his desperation for guidance from Qui-Gon over a really bad Fugitive tier action show where there's chases and fighting in every episodes. But they're selling it to kids and the chinese so it has to have blunt and explanatory dialogue with scenes to make sure the audience doesn't get bored.
>I would unironically pay to watch Obi-wan sitting in the desert dealing with his exile and his desperation for guidance from Qui-Gon over a really bad Fugitive tier action show where there's chases and fighting in every episodes.
That's literally what John Jackson Miller's novel "Kenobi" was about. Plus some cool space western stuff.
Kind of, I suppose. The old extended universe had a lot of good stuff in it that weren't just rehashes of the old movies but at the same time it was that same extended universe that gave us Top 10 Facts about Darth Vader's Armor
you can set any wwii or western movie in the star wars universe and it works because thats what star wars is. that may still be technically limited depending on how you look at if but in pure terms of how many movies and show you can make from it that are "original stories/characters" there are plenty for years and years and years
its just that its controlled by dumb israelite Black person women so that sort of stuff doesnt happen
I don't think he has any reason to think otherwise. A lot of people, me included, think of it as an expansive world because Star Wars is made up of so many component parts and if you were to break that down and venture into each part separately then that's a massive array of stories you can tell. If you venture into the depth of the old EU you can find stuff as weird as spy fiction but everything put in front of the actual audience is just calling back to old Star Wars movies.
See that's still something to give him shit over. He makes a shit no research opinion and assumes it's right no questions. You never encourage moronic shit like that. Star wars excels as a concept but people only give a shit about jedi/sith and mandolorians. Oddly bad batch while being eh still was alot more interesting then the boba fett show because it showed more of the actual underworld/non force going on are my favorite parts personally
It is limited because the ones who own it can't see anything beyond Jedis, Dart Vader and everything made in the past, they don't understand that the Skywalker story arc had a definitive end.
They could create different stories in the SW universe just like Lucas did with the Endor movies but that is way too risky.
Yes. Despite having an entire galaxy to work with, Star Wars really struggles to do anything new. Its always the same 2 families and a handful of their friends, on the same couple planets, running through the same 3 plots on repeat.
The Disney+ shows are moving in the right direction, but the more time goes on the more they inevitably get pulled in by the orbit of the same shit mentioned above.
Give me 4 seasons of a show where no one so much as mentions a skywalker, a Jedi, Tatooine, or the death star. Not everything needs to be about one or more of those things. Go literally anywhere else in the galaxy and do literally anything else.
Rian never got a trilogy, so thats irrelevant. I'm sure lots of cool and original Star Wars stuff gets suggested, but it doesn't matter if it never makes it past a room of executives and never gets made.
youre lying to yourself and you know it. not only could they effortlessly destroy deathstars with those dumb attacks, its enough to make entire planets inhospitable
they arent fast enough and a single ramming attack wouldnt even do enough damage to destroy a single ship
are you being serious? is this how brain addled moronic Black person brained zoomies think?
i mean the obvious wwii example would be japanese kamikaze attacks you dick sucker. those did work ok but didnt cause nearly as much damage as the star wars equivalent and they also only started doing them at the end of the war after they basically lost. kamikaze was just a guided normal bomb and work better because you had a human to try to steer it into its target.
if you made it the equivalent of star wars, each kamikaze attack would have the power of a nuclear bomb and that would have won them the war yes
although it also brings up the question about why the empire doesnt have or use this tech since they have much greater resources and technology. why waste time building planet destroying death starts when you can do the same with a tiny ship?
Lightspeed kamikaze was moronic either way you look at it. If it's reliable, then that raises the question of why nobody's thought to make hyperspace torpedoes/drone ships, and if it's a "one-in-a-million shot" it kind of paints Holdo as either a coward who got insanely unlucky or a hypocrite who engaged in the same behavior that she'd previously chewed Poe out for, i.e. betting the survival of the resistance on bad odds.
>Lightspeed kamikaze was moronic either way you look at it. If it's reliable, then that raises the question of why nobody's thought to make hyperspace torpedoes/drone ships,
I was thinking about this when I was 8 years old. The fact that some people can't even understand the issue is crazy.
its just a common issue with sci-fi that everyone should know about and know why you dont want to introduce it in the story. just like time travel. its a fricking mess and cant be contained plot wise once you unleash it
No. The New Jedi Order series alone proves this, with the worst entries of the 19 book story still better than anything Disney's made. And it's probably the worst major series of the old EU.
>And it's probably the worst major series of the old EU.
Dude, do you have any idea what came after NJO? LotF series was TLJ of its time. If not the overall Disney Trilogy of its time.
Star Wars is limited, because they’re not hiring creative people. They’re hiring a bunch of yes-men or SJW morons who don’t know how to write/direct.
They could introduce new planets, new species, new characters, and new families.
Because at its core, Star Wars is a film about a dysfunctional family. And once all the main characters are dead, and the writers/directors SUCK and don’t give Rei a family, it becomes a bunch of shit.
Not only are most of the original characters dead, including the ENTIRE Skywalker bloodline, but their name and legacy has also been stolen by an honest-to-god Mary Sue.
The Empire was never really defeated, it came back under a new name.
Vader's sacrifice meant basically frick-all, because Creamy Sheev survived and was ruling the Not!Empire from behind the scenes the whole time.
Luke turned into a cowardly failure who fricked off to drink green milk and wait to die on some backwater planet.
He is right.
Jay challenged him on this saying there lots of things you could do with this universe. >"But then it's too smart for star wars"
which he meant as in people start saying "this doesn't feel like staar wars"
You can her people saying the force awakens was good because it recaptured what star wars is about.
It's funny because he wears that hat to feel more secure about his male pattern baldness, but everyone can see right through it clear as day. Just like those of you reading this very reply suffering from the same thing just KNOW everyone around you can see right through your massive insecurity, and it's quite pathetic.
I have a full head of hair and if it ever starts thinning and receding I hope to embrace it gracefully and become the kind of man who fools around with 17 year old girls in his camaro.
No, but you have too look outside of the movies where every possible cliche that could be used was used
>oops we retconned it
Yes, but for the wrong reasons. Star Wars only works because George Lucas was an extremely knowledgeable artist creating genuine art. That's why when anyone else tries to do something with the setting it results in trash. It's because they fundamentally misunderstood Star Wars.
>Source?
>A youtuber of course
/facepalm
true very true
I just wish lucas knew how to put is foot down.
Sadly the star wars universe does't make sense the harder you try to make sense of it.
jedis,force,empire,rebel,science none of makes sense when examining the universe of star wars
That guy's entire channel boils down to "George Lucas uses the vehicle of Star Wars to generate a series of homages to scenes George watched as a kid. Therefore, George is a genius- because he's copied film shots and modified iconic film lines from the 1940's and 1950's for modern audiences."
Basically, his entire argument boils down to George Lucas has nothing original to say, he only remakes scenes and uses lines from other people's work in a whacky Sci Fi universe made to sell toys- and this makes him a super genius. His video about RLM and Stuckmann and other reviewers is correct, but on everything else he's a fricking moron.
If he's such an auteur, then why did he screw up the prequels so much?
Because all his peers who checked his work anytime he was doing something too moronic left and got replaced by yes men.
Darth Insanius is one of those names that if the game was good it wouldn't be criticized and if the game was shit then it'd be memed to death.
They should have followed the pattern of InVader and InSidious and called him Darth Sanius.
>George Lucas was an extremely knowledgeable artist creating genuine art
please keep star wars discussion to your containment thread
Just call it a general thread you chode. Fricking jannies and their love for trek.
frick off trekBlack person
he loved solo
he loved mando
he like last jedi
he like rise of skywalker
Solo was great
The main guy seems like a charisma void from the trailers. How is he in the movie?
He was okay. Movie was fun at least and was the best thing Disney was able to accomplish. Didn't overstay its welcome. Would've watched a sequel tho. Better than Rogue One.
Hm, I'll give it a go.
I won't lie to you there's some stupid shit in it but most of that shit is ancillary. Plus they lampoon libtards in it
He's... passable, I guess. Definitely nowhere near OT Harrison Ford's charisma, but not painful to watch either.
Never take the opinions of these apathetic defeatists seriously
don't know, never watched it
It is if we talk about how Disney has handled it. Lucas was smart enough to realize that the first three films needed a distinct feel from the originals, even though they all look kinda shit every place the characters go to is unique. There's the city planet, the water planet, the jungle planet, and the red bug desert planet. On that latter point geonosis is kind of a lame stand-in for tatooine, but Dooku's performance sells it as the whole area feels inhuman and unsafe.
If Disney was smart, the sequel trilogy would have been on three different planets which would have stopped the plot from sprawling out and forced a larger focus on the characters. I don't think anyone knows or cares about dantooine but they could have shot it cheaply in Colorado and have it be the same story of someone irrelevant becoming meaningful. Which would have been a carbon copy of Luke's and Anakin's stories but the change in atmosphere/sets would have tricked the audience. And this would have permitted them to do the 9th film in an evil nazi planet where it's just nu-wolfenstien and hurr durr orange man bad etc (but done well and in a way that's at least interesting to watch).
What fails is the execution. A good production staff could have done something that wasn't boring, convoluted or just plain messy. Especially with the transition from Ryan to JJ, there's no cohesive plot and nothing makes sense so good ideas aren't built on and everything feels useless. Which it is because ultimately it's just a paid, disposable product.
They shit on starwars because they are trek nerds. Which is just as shitty.
Mike thinks Empire Strikes Back is one of the greatest movies ever. Ghostbusters, Empire, Tremors and Rocketeer.
When they talked about the Rocketeer they thought it was perfect aside from the cleavage
no
I want Kreia to stick her stump up my ass and call me a fool for giving a coin to a hobo
Nope. Mandalorian disproves it.
What? The main character is a bounty hunder who is basically like Boba Fett except his armor looks different and he's protecting a kid who is literally just a baby version of Yoda. The villain is empire shits again and they go to tattooine even though its a completely backwaters planet.
I loved the part where Bobba Fett showed up and we all got up and clapped.
mandalorian unironically proved his point
everything is just deviantart tier oc characters
Considering the last three shows have had Tatooine, and previous characters being shoe-horned it, it's easy to see it that way.
The first season of Mando was pretty entertaining, because it felt very simple, just a Mandalorian bounty hunter and his companion doing odd jobs.
Then Disney saw it was the underdog compared to the shit trilogy, and hijacked it for all 12 spin offs that will be coming out in 2 months intervals.
So at the moment, yes it is, but that's just because Disney are corporate hacks who don't want to take risks or innovate.
>Then Disney saw it was the underdog compared to the shit trilogy, and hijacked it for all 12 spin offs that will be coming out in 2 months intervals.
Nah, Filoni and Favreau wanted to build their own Star Wars shared universe.
Other then Luke, most of the pre-existing characters they put into Mandalorian were all Mandalorian or adjacent to Mandalore stories, which makes sense with the show being a normie introduction to Mandos and Mando lore.
>Mando lore
no such thing. its been retconned so many times its nothing but goo at this point
Depends. It is extremely limited by all of its technology being hand-wave magic without even an attempt on setting up some kind limit on what is and isn't technologically possible, how expensive it is to push certain limits technologically versus others and of system of possible logistics that supports the rest of it it is hard to create any interesting narratives that are a result of the social pressures and conditions that these factors will shape.
Rich and Mike are Trekkies and Trekkies have always been mad that Star Wars was more popular.
>shits on Star Wars for being "held together by ESB"
>ignores that Star Trek is held together by TNG
tos is better than tng though
No, he has a raging hate boner for the prequel trilogy despite it expanding on the universe and being the best trilogy overall.
>Expanding the universe
>When the entire story revolves around people from the OT and happens on planets that we saw or that were mentioned in the OT.
>When the entire story revolves around people from the OT and happens on planets that we saw or that were mentioned in the OT.
Yes but there is a lot more to the movies than just those things. It's a prequel story so of course it will revolve around some of the same characters but they introduce a ton of new ones, new locations, new tech, etc. etc.
The Mandalorian showed it isn't, but they instantly fricked it up by making it all about the jedi again.
And even the force could be interesting if they approached it like in KOTOR II, but Disney isn't smart enough to think long term, even if their soijak fans stop buying their product they won't bother innovating.
They just pump out content based on recent demographics, which are probably generated through social media activity. This means the core process of making films is dictated by twitter and reddit which is mostly bot farms. They cater to a demographic that does not exist.
I know, and you'd think they'd be able to see that already, but for whatever reason all big corpos don't understand Twitter doesn't equal sales, they look at numbers in a way that makes it seem like they don't know what's a human.
Baby Yoda may have worked as a nice lil' extra if it had stuck to the Wolf and Cub formula maybe with a Cowboy Bebop style episodic stories and as you say not involve the empire, season 2 adds in more things about the force and familiar faces once again, I think it's better than season 1, but it dooms the series to keep on going with the same tired formula of the force being the center point of everything.
Rich is completely right about the force and space magic being boring because it excuses away everything, if only they went the route of KOTOR II it could actually make for a good story by showing how monstruous the idea of fate and cycles actually is in that universe.
Mandalorian would have been better if it never involved the Empire in any way imo (at least S1, never watched anything beyond that)
The way things have been handled so far, kind of.
>Thousands of different worlds, but we only see a small handful or places that are practically indistinguishable from the well-known ones
>Everything connects to the same handful of characters in some way
It all serves to make the universe seem kind of shallow and limited.
You could literally tell any kind of story in Star Wars. There is nothing technically off limits and there's all kinds of stories out there. That doesn't mean Disney will greenlight everything. Even Obi-Wan's old writer said he used biblical references and the new writer just made a surface level israelite during WW2 tier parallels. I would unironically pay to watch Obi-wan sitting in the desert dealing with his exile and his desperation for guidance from Qui-Gon over a really bad Fugitive tier action show where there's chases and fighting in every episodes. But they're selling it to kids and the chinese so it has to have blunt and explanatory dialogue with scenes to make sure the audience doesn't get bored.
So chinks really hate everything that isn't just fast paced dopamine rushes?
Honestly I'm still mad those morons didn't just make it a spaghetti western, when that's so obviously what you should do with that story.
>I would unironically pay to watch Obi-wan sitting in the desert dealing with his exile and his desperation for guidance from Qui-Gon over a really bad Fugitive tier action show where there's chases and fighting in every episodes.
That's literally what John Jackson Miller's novel "Kenobi" was about. Plus some cool space western stuff.
You could have ANYTHING going on in the unknown regions.
Kind of, I suppose. The old extended universe had a lot of good stuff in it that weren't just rehashes of the old movies but at the same time it was that same extended universe that gave us Top 10 Facts about Darth Vader's Armor
you can set any wwii or western movie in the star wars universe and it works because thats what star wars is. that may still be technically limited depending on how you look at if but in pure terms of how many movies and show you can make from it that are "original stories/characters" there are plenty for years and years and years
its just that its controlled by dumb israelite Black person women so that sort of stuff doesnt happen
I don't think he has any reason to think otherwise. A lot of people, me included, think of it as an expansive world because Star Wars is made up of so many component parts and if you were to break that down and venture into each part separately then that's a massive array of stories you can tell. If you venture into the depth of the old EU you can find stuff as weird as spy fiction but everything put in front of the actual audience is just calling back to old Star Wars movies.
See that's still something to give him shit over. He makes a shit no research opinion and assumes it's right no questions. You never encourage moronic shit like that. Star wars excels as a concept but people only give a shit about jedi/sith and mandolorians. Oddly bad batch while being eh still was alot more interesting then the boba fett show because it showed more of the actual underworld/non force going on are my favorite parts personally
It is limited because the ones who own it can't see anything beyond Jedis, Dart Vader and everything made in the past, they don't understand that the Skywalker story arc had a definitive end.
They could create different stories in the SW universe just like Lucas did with the Endor movies but that is way too risky.
Yes. Despite having an entire galaxy to work with, Star Wars really struggles to do anything new. Its always the same 2 families and a handful of their friends, on the same couple planets, running through the same 3 plots on repeat.
The Disney+ shows are moving in the right direction, but the more time goes on the more they inevitably get pulled in by the orbit of the same shit mentioned above.
Give me 4 seasons of a show where no one so much as mentions a skywalker, a Jedi, Tatooine, or the death star. Not everything needs to be about one or more of those things. Go literally anywhere else in the galaxy and do literally anything else.
The Rian trilogy was supposed to be set in an unexplored part of the galaxy but then everyoned b***hed about him
Rian never got a trilogy, so thats irrelevant. I'm sure lots of cool and original Star Wars stuff gets suggested, but it doesn't matter if it never makes it past a room of executives and never gets made.
it is quite amazing how despite having both space and magic they have so few ideas on what to make
Yes, but it isn't the artists' fault. Rian Johnson made a casino planet, lightspeed kamikaze and astral projection; the fans raged.
>lightspeed kamikaze
Yeah but that's moronic why wouldn't the rebels constantly be setting ships on auto pilot to kamikaze into huge flagships?
Because the capital ones could just move away? Also that doesn't sound like the battle of attrition they could win
youre lying to yourself and you know it. not only could they effortlessly destroy deathstars with those dumb attacks, its enough to make entire planets inhospitable
Why didn't German Uboats just suicide bomb Allied capital ships?
they arent fast enough and a single ramming attack wouldnt even do enough damage to destroy a single ship
are you being serious? is this how brain addled moronic Black person brained zoomies think?
i mean the obvious wwii example would be japanese kamikaze attacks you dick sucker. those did work ok but didnt cause nearly as much damage as the star wars equivalent and they also only started doing them at the end of the war after they basically lost. kamikaze was just a guided normal bomb and work better because you had a human to try to steer it into its target.
if you made it the equivalent of star wars, each kamikaze attack would have the power of a nuclear bomb and that would have won them the war yes
although it also brings up the question about why the empire doesnt have or use this tech since they have much greater resources and technology. why waste time building planet destroying death starts when you can do the same with a tiny ship?
Meds.
You made the other guy seethe, noice
You mean like the Supremacy did?
Oh, wait...
Lightspeed kamikaze was moronic either way you look at it. If it's reliable, then that raises the question of why nobody's thought to make hyperspace torpedoes/drone ships, and if it's a "one-in-a-million shot" it kind of paints Holdo as either a coward who got insanely unlucky or a hypocrite who engaged in the same behavior that she'd previously chewed Poe out for, i.e. betting the survival of the resistance on bad odds.
>Lightspeed kamikaze was moronic either way you look at it. If it's reliable, then that raises the question of why nobody's thought to make hyperspace torpedoes/drone ships,
I was thinking about this when I was 8 years old. The fact that some people can't even understand the issue is crazy.
its just a common issue with sci-fi that everyone should know about and know why you dont want to introduce it in the story. just like time travel. its a fricking mess and cant be contained plot wise once you unleash it
No. The New Jedi Order series alone proves this, with the worst entries of the 19 book story still better than anything Disney's made. And it's probably the worst major series of the old EU.
>And it's probably the worst major series of the old EU.
Dude, do you have any idea what came after NJO? LotF series was TLJ of its time. If not the overall Disney Trilogy of its time.
Star Wars is limited, because they’re not hiring creative people. They’re hiring a bunch of yes-men or SJW morons who don’t know how to write/direct.
They could introduce new planets, new species, new characters, and new families.
Because at its core, Star Wars is a film about a dysfunctional family. And once all the main characters are dead, and the writers/directors SUCK and don’t give Rei a family, it becomes a bunch of shit.
Not only are most of the original characters dead, including the ENTIRE Skywalker bloodline, but their name and legacy has also been stolen by an honest-to-god Mary Sue.
The Empire was never really defeated, it came back under a new name.
Vader's sacrifice meant basically frick-all, because Creamy Sheev survived and was ruling the Not!Empire from behind the scenes the whole time.
Luke turned into a cowardly failure who fricked off to drink green milk and wait to die on some backwater planet.
I wouldn't say the universe is intrinsically limited, but the people who create it are.
He is right.
Jay challenged him on this saying there lots of things you could do with this universe.
>"But then it's too smart for star wars"
which he meant as in people start saying "this doesn't feel like staar wars"
You can her people saying the force awakens was good because it recaptured what star wars is about.
Considering that it seems like 80% of everything happens on the same goddam desert planet, I think he's right
No, but clearly Disney agrees with him.
It's funny because he wears that hat to feel more secure about his male pattern baldness, but everyone can see right through it clear as day. Just like those of you reading this very reply suffering from the same thing just KNOW everyone around you can see right through your massive insecurity, and it's quite pathetic.
Bruh.
This isn't reddit, buddy. We embrace it.
>This isn't reddit, buddy. We embrace it.
He's always been Costanza bald though is he really hiding anything
I have a full head of hair and if it ever starts thinning and receding I hope to embrace it gracefully and become the kind of man who fools around with 17 year old girls in his camaro.