We dont need to eat animals to survive. This doesnt need to happen.

We don’t need to eat animals to survive. This doesn’t need to happen.

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm eating more meat. Beef. Chicken. Pork. Steak. Fried chicken. Bacon.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah guys come on! We can just eat onions and nuts and be pale-skinned weaklings with b***h breasts

      You are subhuman shitskins, unlike whites you never learned what plants were even edible, you don't even eat veggies

      >pale skin bad
      Meat eaters confirming they are brown latinx subhumans, disgusting, white skin is a trait exclusive to humans not monkeys, I know

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        indians are the highest percent of vegans althoughbeit

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >althoughbeit
          Not a real word tho

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >implying hindustanis eat meat
        I will eat three times more meat. For you.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >hindustani
          Real Suriname hindustanis eat a ton of chicken.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Real non-Suriname hindustanis do not eat chicken.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I eat meat because I know somewhere out there it makes a vegan homosexual mad

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah guys come on! We can just eat onions and nuts and be pale-skinned weaklings with b***h breasts

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >FACTORY FARMS ARE BAD SO NO ONE SHOULD EAT MEAT AT ALL!
    I don't buy factory farm sourced meat, get wrecked homosexual

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    1. Harming or killing animals unnecessarily is wrong
    2. We no longer need to eat animals to survive, so we are killing them and harming them unnecessarily
    3. Therefore eating animals is morally wrong

    If you disagree with 1, then you have to defend bestiality, people torturing cats and dogs for fun, etc which makes you a psychopath

    If you disagree with 2 you’re delusional, virtually all nutrients provided by animals can be found in a non-animal source, the only exceptions being vitamin B12 and D, both of which can easily be supplemented

    It’s over meatbros, there’s no defending it

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Just take 4000 supplements bro, it's more natural!
      Absolutely insane

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >4000 supplements
        You literally only need 2, and there are supplements that provide both in one. You also don’t need that much
        >*take one pill*
        WOOOOOW THAT WAS HARD

        Also the average meatgay doesn’t give a shit about most macro and micronutrients anyways and is likely deficient in a ton of them

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Plant lives matter. If you believe plants do not have feelings then you're delusionally in denial.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Yeah well you stepped on a flower once that’s as bad as torturing a cow for fun LMAO
        Is this the only defense meatgays have now?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >implying we're talking about stepping on flowers and not decapitating acres of plant food
          Why would you stomp on a flower, you psychopath?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Those acres of crops are made to feed animals raised for slaughter anyways, your argument is still irrelevant

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >wheat
              >flour
              >bread
              You are a blatant liar. Or an ignorant idiot.
              >people eating rice
              >people eating popcorn

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                36 percent of all cropland is used for animal feed. Even if you're going to argue that raising crops will kill animals there are far, far more animals killed through the meat industry because not only do you need a shitton of land and feed to feed the animals, you also need to slaughter the actual animals themselves. So if we had to pick between the two, the former would be better. Also, there is a difference between killing an animal by accident (ie roadkill that came out of nowhere), and intentionally killing an animal, unnecessarily

                To argue otherwise is delusion

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, spraying gallons of pesticides is "accidentally" killing those animals

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Literally everything you complain about in agriculture, is applicable to animal agriculture, tenfold. Do you think pest control doesn't exist for animal agriculture either?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Literally everything you complain about in agriculture, is applicable to animal agriculture
                No fricking shit moron, I'm not the one picking and choosing which is "moral". Apparently you're perfectly fine with millions of birds, insects and other shit dying if it's to grow your shitty seed oil crap but it's a fricking tragedy if it moos or goes oink

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >millions of birds, insects and other shit dying
                Exaggerated, and also, applicable to animal agriculture
                >because of some oinks
                No, because objectively speaking more animals die under animal agriculture than regular agriculture.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >exaggerated
                What do you think happens when they clear all that land to have a rapeseed farm moron? Do you think it's like Animals Of Farthing Wood and they go on a fricking odyssey adventure? Are all the animals that remain immune to pesticides as well? You're dumb as dog shit

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You have to clear land for animal agriculture too. How do you rationalize in your head, that these two things are the exact same?

                >Option 1
                >clear land, raise it for crops
                >Option 2
                >clear land, raise it for crops to feed animals, also clear more land, specifically to raise animals, kill the animals you raised too
                >DUH, OPTION 1 IS WORSE AND KILLS MORE ANIMALS

                Did you regurgitate this from Joe Rogan?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >You have to clear land for animal agriculture too
                I know, once again, I'm not the one making grandiose claims about my moral superiority. Like I said, you don't give a frick about how many die, as long as it's one less than animal produce farming you can pretend to be a moral person

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >killing for food is bad!
                >b-but lesser evil killing for food is okay

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, it is. Far more animals die when intentionally raising them for slaughter. The amount of animals that die through agriculture alone is minuscule compared to that. Objectively speaking that is the right thing to do.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The amount of plants killed to feed people is miniscule compared to the number of animals killed.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You contributed to the massacre of plants so you can eat them. Hypocrite.

                I can crush every meatgay argument with one question
                >Is it morally wrong to kill animals unnecessarily?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Is it morally wrong to kill plants unnecessarily?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          No plant will taste as good as crab legs.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          What happens to all your precious farm animals if everyone stops eating meat anon? Where do they go?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Whatever happens in nature. They die, reproduce, evolve, etc.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You contributed to the massacre of plants so you can eat them. Hypocrite.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >4000 supplements
      You literally only need 2, and there are supplements that provide both in one. You also don’t need that much
      >*take one pill*
      WOOOOOW THAT WAS HARD

      Also the average meatgay doesn’t give a shit about most macro and micronutrients anyways and is likely deficient in a ton of them

      No pill will taste as good as lobster thermidor, angus beef, bacon and whale sushi.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      How is killing an animal for consumption ever unnecessary? I can't eat it alive can I?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Because you don’t need to eat animals to survive, there are non-animal alternatives. So it’s unnecessary

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I have heard every homosexual argument for veganism ever and have come to the conclusion that I will never care.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Animals eat other animals in nature.
    Only humans are capable of having moral dilemmas.
    Humans' abstract reasoning for moral dilemmas proves that they are, in fact, better than animals.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    There is nothing wrong with raising and killing animals for meat

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Meatcucks have erectile dysfunction. Veganchads frick all the b***hes!

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If God is dead, then all is permitted. There is no universal law or morality. Therefore it doesn't matter if I eat a double cheeseburger, "morally" speaking. Also you're gay.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I ate a cheeseburger yesterday. Tomorrow I'll get a juicy steak.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >>Cinemaphile

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    No but we need to kill animals, might as well eat them.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    One time the bolt gun didn’t work so we just killed about 10 cows with sledgehammer blows to the head
    Good times. Tasted great

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Would vegans be okay with it if you just waited for the cow to die of natural causes?

    Would elderly cow have a saggier shittier texture to its meat?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      If you literally just found a corpse in the wilds and ate it no, there is nothing morally wrong with that

      However no meat producer can reliably meet the demand for meat this way. The same logic applies for “grass fed” animals who are treated well, that takes up a ton of land and is highly inefficient

      The reason why factory farming exists, is because it’s the most efficient way to meet the consumer demand for meat. You can’t go “yeah I don’t like factory farming” and then not cut down on how much meat you eat without being a hypocrite, because factory farming exists to meet that demand

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I think factory farmed bacon is more delicious.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Eating animal has nothing to do with morals. Period

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You literally can't defend eating meat in the modern age, without defending literally any and all forms of animal abuse

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You literally can't argue against killing animal life for food and not argue against killing plant life for food.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If all vegans collectively committed suicide then the world would be a better place than ever before

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    apparently you can't eat anything without killing animals so ¯_(ツ)_/¯

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *