Wendell and Wild

Did I really miss the Wendell and Wild thread? I thought this movie would be more popular.

What did we think of it?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It was better than Coraline.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I should really rewatch Coraline to compare, but at least I think the themes and morals in this were certainly stronger. But also that Coraline will remain the more well known beloved classic out of the two, and this will play second fiddle as “something to watch if you liked Coraline.”

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This is a great movie, but Coraline was better. It's not that Coraline was "simpler" it's that it was laser-precise to get into your head, dredging up childhood fantasies and fears. Move to a new home, there's a secret room, on the other side is a "better" world that's got a rotten core and the whole thing turns evil. It's just easier to get into.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It wasn't bad but this isn't even close to true

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I think Coraline's story is structured better. But I like the design and personality of the MC in this one better than Coraline. Coraline felt way too mean to characters like Wyb, meanwhile even though Kat has more than enough reason to be b***hy as well, she's just rough around the edges and not trying to be mean.

      Now that I think about it I liked all the designs in the movie more than Coraline. They were fun.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wrong

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This. I could watch Coraline again and again forever, but I can't see myself revisiting Wendell & Wild all that much, even with the bigger scope and larger cast of characters.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No, but I did enjoy it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I just seen the movie. I really liked it. The ending felt a little rush. I thought the animal that does stuff was interesting that it didn't belong to the main protagonist. I like that the mean girl went against her parents. It was interesting they tackle the private prison position.

      Coraline is still my favorite. I think it might be nostalgia but I felt everything in Coraline just flowed better.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Better animation, sure, but Wendell and Wild is just a complete mess in terms of characters, setting, and story. Coraline on the other hand draws from a popular children's novel and arguably manages to improve on some aspects.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Its a mess. Damn shame Peele has to obsessively shove some kind of political angle into everything he does now because honestly removing the generic evil corporation plotline would free up the runtime to focus on the films actual strengths- interpersonal character relations. Its a 6/10 at best, which is a damn shame because you could’ve easily tightened up the script and cut out half the characters and not really lost anything.
      Remove the troony, remove the klax korp bullshit, remove the nun and the janitor, rewrite the story to focus solely on Kat trying to heal from her trauma and make her second chance work, and tie that in better with Wendell and Wild’s own familial issues and you’d easily have a more solid film.

      As it stands its a messy ass film that tries to shove too much in too little of a runtime. oh yeah, and the reused animation to pad out the runtime doesn’t help it much either.
      Wasted potential really.

      Objectively wrong you fricking moron

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It alright.
      It tasteless and lukewarm,not subtle and nuanced.
      It remind me of me wacky horror stop-motion film by Tim Burton's sex slave which I prefer but it alright.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Now that I think about it, this movie was just as convoluted as Monkeybone but with better presentation.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >see this post
      >immediately download to watch
      >get to trans shit
      Dropped

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I was wondering how many days we'd be able to discuss the movie without these kinds of posts. We got a few!

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Not sorry.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    For a good portion of it, I was worried that they were juggling too many characters and subplots, but it really came together well. Only one that didn’t really land for me was that Manberg guy. I didn’t really get what his deal was, and there was this implication that he and Sister Helley had this whole history together that was important to the story and lore, but which I didn’t really find interesting.

    Also, the setup to the whole thing was that it was supposed to be about a girl and her two demons, but in the end Kat really doesn’t interact with Wendell and Wild a whole lot, and that was a little disappointing.

    But other than that it was overall pretty good. The animation in many scenes made for lots of really cute moments throughout, I liked the theme dealing with trauma, and I was surprised and impressed that the main conflict was a criticism of the privatized prison system, and that it explains the issue simply in a way that children can understand. Also I want to frick the latinx pussy boi.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You say that it explains things in a way that children could understand, but throughout the whole movie it felt like most of the real-world issues it wanted to cover were moreso preaching to the choir rather than for explaining to kids
      Kinda like they kept referencing issues that adults already know about, but never took the time to convey their meanings in a way that people new to them could grasp

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Iunno, I thought this little speech spelled it out very neatly. This scene is babby’s first intro the the industrialized prison
        complex.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          On a related note, how did she not know about the scummy conditions of the prisons, but was aware of how her parents cheat people by giving them company script instead of money?

          On an unrelated note, I think it was a poor design choice to punch holes right on top of her nostrils instead of beneath.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            She is a child, and up until it was expressly pointed out to her that her parents are shitty and she started thinking for herself and really looking into it, she probably bought into the old scam that “company store credit is just as good as, if not better, than real money! :^D” She could have known that her parents’ employees and staff get paid in monopoly money, but not previously known that that was a bad thing, or why.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I'm on Team "It's a damn good movie" but to be fair I'll agree that it could have benefitted from a scene showing Siobahn STARTING to do her own research, a few scenes before she confronts her parents. As it stands it went from Siobahn hearing from Kat "prisons are bad" then Siobahn giving a mini-dissertation on why. Bit bumpy.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You’re right. But I also can’t blame the stop motion animators for not wanting to spend multiple weeks making a scene of just a girl doing a google search.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                At that point Siobahn's just the main character.

                What it actually needed was a scene of them getting the trapped demons from the school. Cause they basically did that off screen in 2 seconds which is literally impossible.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                How to drink is one of the worst bartending youtubers.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >How to drink is one of the worst bartending youtubers.
                Not sure what your problem is other than he uses tart too much without clarifying he means sour and not bitter.

                Better than describing everything as "medicinal" which someone I can think of often does. The worst tasting note in existence. Give me a billion tire fires over that shit.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >At that point Siobahn's just the main character.
                A scene of her Looking out a window at the town library and looking like she's decided to go do research would've been enough. Could've even thrown in Kat's words replaying in Siobahn's head to drive home that Kat got the ball rolling. Like I said, it's not a major flaw or anything, just something that could've been smoother.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    All you missed were some lengthy reviews and poorly thought out political discourse.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >black Wario and Waluigi

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Movie looks nice but the script is a fricking mess. I'm not even talking about the pol shit, I mean the fact that the film throws a lot of lore with no time to digest it, followed by a confused narrative with like 5 different antagonists

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I have a feeling that this is a result of it being written as a book first, though a quick google search tells me that the book wasn’t actually published, so I guess we can’t read it to know for sure. But I spent a lot of the time watching assuming that this wast an adaptation of the first book in a whole YA short novel series, and that that’s why they very quickly just blow past some details.

      It definitely could have been a lot tighter and simpler if they just trimmed some characters.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You didn't like black Boris Johnson, not Cruella de Vil and the school play costume skeleton crew?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Hey, those zombies were fun. It helped that they were mute and were really more like props than characters.

        Although their role in the plot was very silly and cartoony in a “well there’s nothing in the rules that says a dog /can’t/ play basketball!” kind of way. The council just immediately accepts their resurrection and then completely gives up trying to resist them. Even with it being a cartoon that calls for a suspension of disbelief, it’s asking a lot.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Liberals don't realize there are laws preventing dead people from voting.
          Typical

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            They weren't dead, they were UNdead

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >W&W randomly pull out a mix of assorted Village People costumes and toss them at the reanimated corpses, who stumble in them like they’re dumb cheap groucho marx disguises
        >skeletons later march into the council meeting and reveal the portraits of themselves as they were living on the wall
        >it turns out they all really dressed that way
        I dunno, I thought that little detail was kinda funny.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This, it felt like they didn’t know who the main characters were or even what their goals were until almost halfway in, and by that point I kind of gave up on it, and some of the stylization was cool but some designs were just too atrocious/stood out too badly like that Indian Prep girl

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      How did you handle Paranorman, where there was a whole town of antagonists, and then DEAD townsfolk as antagonists, and then it turned out the town was back to being the real antagonists, and then actually it was the witch that was the real antagonist, whipping around again back to nope just the shitty townsfolk, still being shitty generation after generation?

      In W & W it's pretty much just the Klaxons, with Bests getting dragged into villainy because he's orbiting them. Beezle does a little because he's trying to get his boys back, but not much.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >In W & W it's pretty much just the Klaxons
        You forgot Kat murdering her parents, the nun deliberately exposing students to sentient demonic artifacts to give them demon powers and then not explaining those powers until they're fricking cursed to serve demons and also working with the janitor to kidnap demons, the janitor kidnapping demons, the bear marking hellmaidens against their will, and W&W trying to kidnap/murder people repeatedly to get their park and literally only betraying the villains because their money wasn't good.

        Oh, and Raul rough drafting a plan to spray paint his mom's breasts across the town's roofs before deciding maybe he should cover that shit with a necklace. And graverobbing. And reviving Kat's parents against their will for no reason. And trying to murder Siobhan with that brick.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          A lot of that is just a list of characters committing crimes. I guess it serves your point that the script is convoluted, but you should probably know that doing bad things like crimes isn’t what makes a character an antagonist. They actually have to have some form of conflict with the protagonist.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >They actually have to have some form of conflict with the protagonist.
            The antagonists never find out the protagonist exists.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              And they don’t have to.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So, is this universe’s Hell like the eternal punishment thing it is in the Christian concept of Hell, or is it more like a Hades and it’s just a place people’s souls go when they die, and that Buffalo Belzer dude just happens to be a sadist?

    I thought it was nice of the demon brothers to say that they were gonna rebuild the carnival to be a nicer place, but it was slightly confusing because I can’t tell if they’re fighting against some deity’s grand design.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It’s Miltonian in a sense, what the devil wants most of all is a “heaven” that belongs to him

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Movie was mediocre, MC is just a b***h with few scenes that justifies his actions.
    Plot is all over the place and it really shows there were some scenes missing.

    And finally the anticorpo theme was really poor and generic, there were many ways to implement but it ended up really straight to your face.

    Only nice thing it has is the character designs and the meanie b***h group actually be kind to the MC and the trans kid

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >meanie b***h group
      It was really just one chick and two cardboard cutout henchwomen. You could have cut one or both of Shivahn’s (or however the hell you spell it) friends and it would only serve to make more sense why she was so desperate to make friends with Kat and so disappointed she had had a falling out with Raul.

      I will say though that the short asian friend- I think her name was even Sweetie- was the cutest character in the film, so I don’t mind her being there.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Chiffon

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          No that doesn’t seem right either.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Siobahn. It's Irish, meaning the spelling makes no sense. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8Oa1JXUI3U

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >It's Irish, meaning the spelling makes no sense.
          lol so true

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Only nice thing it has is the character designs and the meanie b***h group
      This was a weird example where the MC was way b***hier and meaner than the 'Bully' group. They were sweet as frick, honestly why am I supposed to root for the b***h MC when she was selfish and pissy compared to the 3 side-characters that were way more likeable?

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I was hesitant to watch because I've found stop-motion animated films aimed at older audiences to be kind of try hard on the adult humour and weak on story unless it's something like Anomalisa.

    Does it manage to avoid that?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It honestly didn't need the PG-13 rating, it's much more goofy leaning with some darker subject matter and moments tossed in. Story is a bit clustered though, they're trying to tell a lot in a short amount of time. I'm not really sure what they could have cut though, an anon in a previous thread put it well saying it felt like it was originally meant to be a mini series and got condensed into an hour and thirty minutes.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Why was it rated PG-13 though, language?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonyrnous

          >some thematic material, violence, substance abuse and brief strong language
          Basically the casual use of hell/demon/death imagery, Father Bests's murder, and Wendell & Wild tripping balls on the hair cream as well as saying, "ass." I think Kat threw in one "damn" somewhere.

          Mostly inoffensive compared to LAIKA's films, but still mature enough to earn that PG-13 rating.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I couldn’t help but giggle every time I saw Wendell & Wild in their fancy suits. Wild looked especially funny.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              The characters didn’t at all need to go all out like that with the ghost mortician bit, but god damn do I love that they did.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              What exactly is the joke?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It’s not a joke. Anon just think these guys look silly in what I’m guessing are 19th century mortician costumes. And they do- the formal and sombre nature of the costumes don’t fit their buffoonish personalities at all.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I couldn’t help but giggle every time I saw Wendell & Wild in their fancy suits. Wild looked especially funny.

            I loved the setup for the cream being like shrooms when they eat it. When Wild said it "tickled his tummy" I assumed it was just a cartoonish thing for a goofy numbskull to do, so I loved the reveal that it was a more mature joke in nature. Totally set the tone for me, the two of them on screen were always a highlight

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              So they had that vision because Kat almost drowned underwater? Am I getting that right?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes? That was my interpretation. She had a near death experience and it brought her close to the afterlife, where they live.

                You could also attribute it to the hair cream trip.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Wendell & Wild tripping balls on the hair cream
            Can you really get high on hair cream?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              You can get high on anything if you stack it tall enough.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Anyone here seen ONI: Thunder God's Tale? I think if you can't afford to make a miniseries fully in stop-motion, you're better off keeping your CG's frame rate more conventional and less choppy.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They made it that choppy BECAUSE they couldn't afford something else anon. CG Render time is money.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I think the animation looks fine since it's still plenty expressive and works well for a cast of characters who are all supposed to look like tiny Japanese trinkets brought to life. My only real issue is with the main girl's design, the face in particular. Seeing the more appealing concept art doesn't help.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's not Hell & Back if that's what you mean.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It really felt like they weren’t actually targeting adults. The demons even say “the souls of the danged” instead of “damned” when talking about dead people in Hell (which I think they also call “The Underworld” or “The Land of the Dead,” and not even Hell). These choices might be purposeful for humor or lore reasons, but I think it’s more likely they were just meant to make the movie more kid friendly. I doubt many parents will actually give a shit that it’s pg 13, and I think that the rating was a last minute decision.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Weirdly enough, Kat does say “damn” at one point, and as an expletive too, not in the biblical sense.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        yeah this really did not feel PG13 at all, unless having ugly trans girl makes anything PG13 now.

        Really the whole movie was just a mess and all over the place. I really hated the style actually. The fun of stop motion is that it's 3D, yet a lot of the models and animation where 2D. It made lot of shots and moments very awkward when they need to do make just about any kind of motion as you can tell that part of their faces aren't missing or seem to magically apear.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Even though I think the movie is generally kid friendly, I also think the PG13 rating was ultimately over more than just the trans character. There are a few things besides just that that would make quite a lot of certain kinds of very vocal parents very uncomfortable, as well as probably the MPAA. The movie fricks around with religious themes that actual christians might not take kindly to, they drop just a few little swears, a little sideboobage, and quite a lot of people explicitly die. One scene has a man bonked in the head with a golf club and then shoved into a lake to drown, and we later see his funeral and his corpse. That’s pretty rough for a kids’ movie. But then the trans kid is the cherry on top.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >a little sideboobage,
            Where?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Raul’s art project. The warrior mommy’s breasts are covered only by a necklace or some neck garment, and you get a little underboob. Also apparently somewhere in the credits she is fully bare chested.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >uncensored butthole and breasts
            >ending song pretty explicitly about fingerbanging
            Ya think?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I did not catch the butthole flash and I refuse to go looking for it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Do it, I wanna see it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's during his introduction, he shits the souls he eats out. You get the full monty.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Oh. Didnt even register with me since its just an internal shot.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Oh I guess theres actually both, but I couldnt even tell because the quality on my rip is so shit that it just mostly looked like black.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >a whole team of artists designed, modeled, painted, lit, animated, and edited Belzer's butthole
                All for a blink-and-you'll-miss-it shot whose purpose I still can't quite understand.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I predict he'll get the most r34 art out of all the characters.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I wish.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It cuts to an external shot for like 3 seconds. You see his exposed, throbbing, gaping anus and tail hanging down then you see ghosts come out before being fished up to the surface. You see it from the inside right before that though.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Mad God is what you want if you want non-humor in adult animation

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I thought it was just okay, weird pacing and messy story though, and a couple weird edits, like scenes didn't need to be layered the way they were, boring main antagonists unfortunately which i think brings it down the most, but Wendell and Wild were fun.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >that fricking "Noo~" from the dad in the first 2 minutes as he drives his family off a bridge
    Would it kill them to hire actual voice actors

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Where can I watch Netflix shows for free. I'd like to watch this.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Ask your friend, or cousin, or co-worker for their login info. Literally everyone knows somebody with a Netflix account.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        kys normie

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >he proudly said while begging for spoonfeeding
          if you don't know how to torrent in current year, you have absolutely no right to call anyone a normalgay

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Kat’s mom had some FAT breasts

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      post her

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Damn, Mama was STACKED

      based coomers

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Hmm, theres something Opra about her design too.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        aight, had to do it.

        https://imgur.com/a/ubdWxQn

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >It begins

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Disgusting.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I appreciate it. I hope Wilma gets the attention she deserves.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Siobhan

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Do you need me to call you an ambulance, anon?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No he's right that is it

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I love gabby goat, it reminds me of a friend

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >"horror comedy"
          >The scariest scene is a trans kid getting deadnamed
          It's 2022 I guess.
          I'm still not sure that the main "mean" girl actually did it as an insult since literally nothing else in the entire movie involves her being mean.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I don't think it was supposed to be an insult. We see pictures of them together when he was Romona so I believe it was a genuine accident.

            But in 2022 that's just as bad right?

            Btw, I actually do have a personal anecdote. In highschool I was the T. A for a teacher in charge of yearbook, which meant I put away chairs after school assembly and passed out I. D cards. Anyways one day I'm going around passing I. D cards to classroom the names were written on the back so I didn't really look at the pictures, I remember being confused by a senior girl because I didn't remember anybody new coming to school late in the year. Turns out it was a transgender student who had his named to her (I don't actually remember the name before or after)

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Idk this was pretty scary

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              It's a shame but the "old guard" zombies are so stylized they cross the line into being ineffectual, like preschool cartoon zombies or something.

              Paranorman for example kept them funny but still looking like proper horror creatures.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Zombies aren't particularly effective horror creatures to begin with. Other than "Corpse gross," the only element of fear they contribute is when their condition is contagious, and they're usually too slow and weak to properly carry that threat to begin with. You'd have to be totally surrounded and defenseless to be in a situation where they're threatening. Rabid animals are scarier than zombies.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Now that you mention it, that deadnaming scene does feel unnecessary once you realize Siobhan isn't a mean girl after all. I guess it shows she can be oblivious, but she was always a good person, albeit one with no sense of boundaries. Maybe we're reading into it and it was just a way to give the film a more realistic vibe with an accidental microaggression.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >microaggression.

              Please retire this loathsome overdramatic word.

              >umm everyone is my enemy okay!!! words are violence!

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Wow. A word is making you upset. Sounds like you need to stop being so sensitive.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >"horror comedy"
              >The scariest scene is a trans kid getting deadnamed
              It's 2022 I guess.
              I'm still not sure that the main "mean" girl actually did it as an insult since literally nothing else in the entire movie involves her being mean.

              In the scene, right after doing it, she apologizes profusely
              You're never supposed to think she's being mean, it's clear from the start that she's well-intentioned but blind.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Well, the thing is it could be "Oh-- sorry!!! I-I keep forgetting" or "Oh SORRY. I keep F O R G E T T I N G" you know.

                What's weird about that is that the delivery is so flat (clearly an issue with the voice actress in general) than you can interpret it both as a real apology or a mock apology. And the scene is staged so neutrally in terms of animation that you don't quite get a clue there either (the other girls just literally stand around without a change of expression). So I honestly don't know if that was really CLEVER writing, in which you don't get what to think handed to you, or just generally bad filmmaking.

                The general writing style for the movie and the fact that nothing much comes out of that girl as a character except for functional stuff regarding the general plot makes me lean towards the latter.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Should a dude be allowed at an all girl school?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                she probably just actually forgot, assuming she is not a mean girl stereotype
                reasonable trans understand that if you've called someone one name for literally years, it will take a while for them to remember the new one. most people get confused if they have to rename a dog let alone a person.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Going with this. I know a few trans people at work and occasionally stumble and use the pronouns I got used to. It's not malice, it's just... well frick, there's no switch in my brain I can just flip. You go by one name&set of pronouns for years, people who knew you back then will have an occasional oops.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You bigot! Keep on making that mistake and soon you’ll be cancelled for purposeful misgendering, transphobe

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                If it hasn't happened yet it ain't gonna happen. I kinda get the feeling that how Cinemaphile says the world works isn't really that accurate on average...

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Trust me, the transgender colleagues might say they forgive you but write on their Twitter accounts about how their job is transphobic. You’re not safe. No one is.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                the ones who arent moronic wont do anything to get fired, they get titty skittles from their job healthcare. its why so many trannies work for defense companies and the military

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >The words "Trust me" spoken on Cinemaphile

                I remember how Anons killed some poor guy that just wanted to know how to triforce.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                w-what

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                If you're afraid about shitty vindictive people you may as well roll into a ball and hide yourself at home. Shitty people exist everywhere, but protic, they're not most people.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I wish they had got an intern or something to delete the face plate lines. They're really distracting and it's not as if there aren't tools around that let you do that in a matter of seconds.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i thought that was deliberate so you didn't forget it was stop motion instead of being 3d

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Cinema Fantasma went through the effort of removing the seams in Frankelda and it looks way more handmade then any American stop motion project in the last decade.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Well they deliberately left them in, I didn't mean to claim they forgot or anything. It's just that I think the models would look nicer without; doing this frame took like 15 seconds for example.

                I thin Dragon or whatever they use has built-in tools to automatize it too.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                But... THE CRAFT

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Kek there's plenty digital effects in the movie anyway c'mon

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Add to the charm for me. I understand if it's distracting

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Hehe Sweetie is so tiny

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I've seen tinier.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Please post more of these goofballs in their cute suits. There weren't enough demon duo escapades in this movie.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                These suits?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Anything's on the table. I love these two.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                They're pretty great. Wish the movie was a little longer so we could've had more of them.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Look at how dhe calls Kat, KK. They scene they do it, it sort of looks bullying but it's just a nickname. In the end of the movie the last time she says KK there's genuine comcern in her voice.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            how could he do that to his body

            ear plugs are disgusting

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >prisons are bad

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They are tho.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, criminals should be allowed to rape, kill, and murder with zero repercussions.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >he thinks the prisons are full of rapists and murderers

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >I will go out of business if I run out of criminals
          >this is a good groundwork to start a business and won’t incentivize bad behaviour in the name of profit

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          People are in prison for smoking weed.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Deliberately sabotaging a brewery so it burns down and kills everyone inside as well as proceeding to try and demolish an entire town in order to build a prison is bad. Their plan to make the school's programs worse in order to ensure that they had a surplus of new prisoners was also pretty fricked.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I absolutely adore the atmosphere and aesthetic, maybe even more than Sellick's previous films. But the structure is complete fricking ass.

    I'm not sure why they needed to imply some far-reaching lore about this group of hell maidens, and have that conspiracy about the prison industrial complex, both of which feel like they warranted a mini-series, when a very simple story setup of Kat finding some generic cursed book of incantations and summoning trickster demons would've served the same purpose without the bloat and resonated way stronger emotionally since the film wouldn't constantly need to cut away to 5 gorillion other elements.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's so disgusting every time a celebrity makes his cartoon character look just like them.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This movie deserves more attention than it's getting.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nah, I like things being niche, especially stop motion. You THINK you want more attention, but you really don't. And Cinemaphile is a terrible fricking board particulatly for stop motion content. There will be bad faith actors stirring shit up over politics or whatever nonsense they can muster. It can never be that a piece of media was enjoyed or criticized in a civil manner, it always has to be an autistic screaming match.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I guess you're right.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Key and Peele are a gift

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Literally who?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        A really funny sketch comedy show

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          What. Is. Your. Secret?

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I enjoy it but it felt like a simple movie for kids.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, it could've just as easily stayed fully family-friendly, but I appreciate that it's still got some edge. That tends to be the case with stop-motion features.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It was okay, but misadvertized. It felt very awkward with the whole "save the town" plot being the bigger conflict when you have zombies and demons from hell involved. Plus I was left craving for more of the creepy moments that were there. But I can't deny the animation and design are a treat.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Somehow despite the messy plot, underdeveloped character relationships, diversity checklist cast that feels like it came from a /misc/ shitpost, and comically overbearing (yet somehow also underdeveloped) messages, it still managed to be a pretty good and charming time.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Do 13 year old girls really dress like this?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Only the ones that have heads shaped like light bulbs.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Minus the boots, yes. Least they did when I was 13, which was admittedly 20 years ago. Although swap the fingerless gloves for a sock cap. I only remember dudes wearing fingerless gloves and even then not many.

      Nobody wore giant ass boots. Regular ass boots? Sure, but nothing up to the knee.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I think the boots are just purposely exaggerated demonias

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If anything they wear even more revealing clothes. Though I do live in a predominantly taco and burrito consuming area of the US rather then watermelon and fried chicken, so there may be minor cultural differences in play.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Didn't actively avoid this thread 🙂

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Anon asked my opinion I gave it. What do you care? 🙂

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is that a black person movie?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's an "every non-white race except for one speaking role" person movie.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It has black people in it, so yes?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You wouldn't call Fat Albert and the Cosby Kids a white show would you?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/10c5ed88-a62d-428d-b37f-2223536ebe17

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm watching it now and I just caught a date. The movie is set in November 2027. How long did they think it'd take to make this shit?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The movie is set in November 2027.
      Is this true? Timestamp?

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It sucked.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    well, a good chunk of it was anons complaining about the OP asking
    >What did we think of it?
    accusing OP of not being able to form their own opinion

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm gonna need a life-size model pronto.

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >just full on uncensored breasts in the credits

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You talkin about the demon daddy?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >You talkin about the demon daddy?
        No. The painting of the Mesoamerican mother with the baby in her arms is uncensored in the credits. She's not wearing her necklace so you just get dead on breasts.

        I think somebody fricked up.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          What part in the credits? I'm skimming through and i don't see it.

          Also, that part at the very end gave me MAD Tales from the Hood vibes.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I though i was the only one, now i feel it had to be intentional.

            [Spoiler]Second movie was horrible garbo and i have not seen the third yet.[spoiler/]

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Fricking kill me

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Never saw the other two but I am a fan of Keith.

              Yeah, I'd shit my pants if I saw that little girl doll running around my room.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                despite the name literally one(1) story took place in a "hood" and it was set entirely in an apartment that was bigger than any shithole I've been in. quality is subjective (thought it was terrible and I still resent the person that put it on) but frickin hell don't lie with your title.
                KD was the star of the show for as little of it mattered, managed to come off both as the least caring and best actor in his like 5 minutes of screentime

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Oh I saw a review of both movies and the concept of a undertaker(?) being hired to tell stories to help with the programing of a killer govt robot is quite silly.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You blind?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I’m more surprised no one’s brought up Belzer’s butthole.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        ??

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Depressing that Laika's so dead that this had to go to "Monkeypaw Productions"

    Even more depressing that Missing Link was what killed Laika, because that was a perfectly fine movie. Not GREAT, but enjoyable.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Laika
      >ever dying
      lol

      I swear they even announced, like, their next two films in production already.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Travis Knight is shifting his attention to live action directing. Laika isn't totally dead - he's even planning on doing another movie - but it's no longer the prized possession showered with attention by the Nike heir.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yikes. Fingers crossed that LAIKA can pull it together and make another Coraline or ParaNorman. Really feels like the studio peaked too early.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine pouring the inhuman effort it takes to make a stop motion feature film into some mediocre nothing that nobody cared about. Running a sweatshop would be less cruel. People at least wear shoes.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I wouldn't call Missing Link "mediocre." I've seen mediocre. It's GOOD, but I can see why it didn't appeal to the Marvel-swilling masses. "It's set in, like... 1897 or something? So like 2000 years ago? And it's not about superpowered Sherlock Holmes and starring RDJ? Pass."

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Laika pushed Selick away after Coraline and turned down finishing Shadow King. Almost certainly because with Laika having originated from Nike Boy taking over Will Vinton Studios, he didn't want to deal with getting mogged by another stop motion legend for an extended period of time.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This was most likely exactly what happened. Laika is basically a multi-million Nike-funded ego playroom for the guy.

        The original developer and director for Kubo (did a hybrid show for Netflix a while ago) recently published a basic overview how the project was taken from him mid-production with Knight taking over and not even changing much for the final product.

        The title of his rap album from what when THAT was his corporate-funded hobby will never cease to make me smile.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Laika already announced their next project with full cast, poster and release year.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Travis Knight is shifting his attention to live action directing. Laika isn't totally dead - he's even planning on doing another movie - but it's no longer the prized possession showered with attention by the Nike heir.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Laika has like three movies in development right now

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Liked:
    >Music's mostly good.
    >Character designs are varied and interesting, albeit distractingly into the cartoony when it really didn't need to be except for the demons.
    >Elements of the worldbuilding would be fun to explore.
    >Pacing wasn't a rigid 3 act structure.

    Cons:
    >Lighting issues (lightning only coming in through one window of a car for example).
    >Sound design issues. Mainly characters not sounding like they're in the environment they're supposed to be in.
    >Elements of the worldbuilding would be fun to explore because they aren't actually fricking explored in the fricking film. You forgot to explain what the frick a hell maiden is. Great fricking job guys.
    >The plot is meandering at best and very little focus is given to what ultimately ends up being the main conflict while what is a side conflict gets a dramatic anti-climax solved by 3 side characters with no input from the main character with 2 of them literally teleporting to get the solution they had no possible way of knowing would be the solution off screen.
    >The climax is six characters we know literally nothing about and who got almost no screentime trying to murder the main cast for presumably a paycheck they wouldn't even fricking be able to use because they're doing it in front of tons of witnesses. Fricking what?
    >The movie very very VERY clearly should have been called Hell Kat. One fricking job. The main character's name is Kat. The main character works with a woman named Helley. They are both hellcats. Fricking come on.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Which side conflict are you referring to?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Wendel and Wild running away from their dad and wanting to start their own park as separate from the save the town bullshit.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This hits a lot of what I felt. If nothing else, hopefully there will be a lot of imaginative art that comes out of this to fill the lack of substance the film had.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The octopus isn't explained
      >There was no payoff for the main character sparing her last traumatic memory
      >The conjoined worms that cause Kat's parent's deaths were very clearly supposed to be Wendel and Wild manifesting through hair cream magic while tripping during the scene where they reach out and touch younger Kat, but they cut it during development to make them more likeable. Should have scrapped that whole scene then though and replaced it with something actually narratively useful.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    All style no substance and honestly the style sucks. Look at the dad's beard and the mc's hair. And "wrinkles" look more like facial scars. It's abrasive but not in a charming way. It's cluttered. So is the writing. Also the voice acting sucks, the characters mumble and rush through their lines a lot. Even with subtitles it's irritating. I quit watching 3/4 the way through. I don't give a shit what happens. The main character is that unlikable. 3/10 wouldn't recommend

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >And "wrinkles" look more like facial scars
      The wrinkles looking exaggerated was a stylistic choice. I liked it on all but one character where I found it distracting. I can see why you wouldn't like it, but no idea what you're b***hing about with the hair. That shit looked great.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >was a stylistic choice
        No shit moron I just fricking said that. Nice useless reply just to say "I disagree"

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You said you think the style sucks. You didn't say the style sucks by choice. Plenty of styles suck because the artists behind the style fricking suck.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Look I'm sorry but Raul's art project was dumb. The Aztecs were some of history's greatest monsters.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Aztec
      It wasn't an Aztec. It was his mother fighting against the fricking Klaxons. The serpents had their eyes and hair (although one had a beard for some reason). That's why in the future vision at the end the fixed up brewery had him showing Kat's parents beheading the serpents.

      The painting was a visual representation of his mother protecting his house/town on the council while trying to put them away after the fire.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >It wasn't an ACTUAL Aztec, it was just art of his mother done in an Aztec style

        Yeah, don't glamorize the Aztecs. They sucked.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Raul's mother just got freed up to go private in time to represent the town in a massive civil suit against the Klaxons
          >Raul's going to be rich as frick off that lawsuit
          >Siobhan's going to need a new home to stay at what with both her parents going to prison for the rest of their lives for mass murder
          Everything's coming up Raul.

          He didn't. He glamourized his mother. The macuahuitl was used for fricking 7 centuries, is in no fricking way unique to the aztecs, and nothing else about the painting has frick all to do with the Aztecs. God this is like b***hing about someone being shown with a musket because Cromwell was a bastard.

          1. Other people that used muskets were bastards
          2. Showing someone with a musket doesn't make them a bastard or tie them to a particular bastard.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >You're NOT meant to think of proud Aztec warriors when you see this

            Don't piss on me and tell me it just the rain. That dog won't hunt.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              What part of that is Aztec? Beyond the brown chick, who is, to reiterate, his mother. Frankly I thought more of Japan. I don't associate serpent fighting with the Aztecs.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >This figure in Aztec clothing, in an Aztec-influenced art style, wielding an Aztec weapon reminded me of Japan

                Well you're an idiot.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                rude

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >This figure in Aztec clothing, in an Aztec-influenced art style, wielding an Aztec weapon reminded me of Japan
                Yes, the figure fighting the multiheaded serpent with a blade at the water's edge reminded me of a myth about someone fighting a multiheaded serpent with a blade at the water's edge.

                And she's not wearing Aztec clothing. She's wearing a nondescript translucent skirt, a turquoise necklace, and an ankle bracelet, and the art-style DEFINITELY isn't Aztec influenced at all like holy frick. Have you ever seen Aztec art? It's way more abstract. That shit's just regular ass art.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You're NOT meant to think of proud Aztec warriors when you see this

                Don't piss on me and tell me it just the rain. That dog won't hunt.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You need to get your eyes checked. Although as long as we're discussing Aztec art. Fun fact: That dude's weapon is literally a live dragon.

                >This figure in Aztec clothing, in an Aztec-influenced art style, wielding an Aztec weapon reminded me of Japan
                Yes, the figure fighting the multiheaded serpent with a blade at the water's edge reminded me of a myth about someone fighting a multiheaded serpent with a blade at the water's edge.

                And she's not wearing Aztec clothing. She's wearing a nondescript translucent skirt, a turquoise necklace, and an ankle bracelet, and the art-style DEFINITELY isn't Aztec influenced at all like holy frick. Have you ever seen Aztec art? It's way more abstract. That shit's just regular ass art.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes yes we all kmow aztecs would use live dragons as weapons and that's why they're extinct now.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It made you think of ancient Japanese culture? Not Meso-American culture? Really?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The literal first thing to go through my head was Orochi vs Susanoo. I'm aware of no Mesoamerican serpent slaying myths. As far as I'm aware they held their dragons in high regard. And it didn't exactly look like Saint George. Cetus only had one head. I was focused on the content. It being a half-naked Mesoamerican chick really didn't factor in much cause other than the macahuitl I couldn't even tell anything about it was supposed to be fricking Mesoamerican. The picture was introduced before Raul's mother and at the time I was operating under the assumption that the figure was supposed to be the fricking Native American government worker from the beginning and Raul just gave her a macahuitl because why the frick not?

                So yes, it made me think of Japanese culture. If you've got a Mesoamerican serpent slaying myth, I'd love to hear about it because I like learning about mythology. Closest I can think of is Cipactli.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Who among us can say which ancient culture this Latino youth's art was referencing? Perhaps Japan!

                Weeaboos, man.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                youre only pretending to be moronic, right?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Hey that lion's kinda sexy

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm dead serious. I'm also not the person claiming a half-naked Mesoamerican chick MUST be Aztec because she has a macahuitl like a psychopath.

                What part in the credits? I'm skimming through and i don't see it.

                Also, that part at the very end gave me MAD Tales from the Hood vibes.

                6th image

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >6th image
                Hurm, guess I'd have to just watch it and not skim through, huh? Missed the image, i guess.

                You blind?

                >You blind?
                No, but I'd make a great lawyer though, do ho ho ho.

                Anyways...just started the movie when she arrives at the school and this is kinda kinda mature to include damn or hell in it. I don't know the rating but I wouldn't be surprised if it was PG or PG13.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Gibberish. The character is Latino, he did a picture of his mom as a badass Aztec warrior. It ain't complicated.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                There's more to Mesoamerican culture than just Aztecs, you racist b***h.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Art of a warrior fighting monsters at the water's edge, wielding a macuahuitl, done in a no-perspective mural style
                >I bet it's a nod to the Olmecs

                C'mon dude, Occam's razor.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >no perspective
                It isn't. Also
                >Ignoring the Mayans and Mixtecs who were way fricking more prominent historically.
                Aztec were a flash in the pan civ that happened to be ascendant when Europeans showed up. It must be Aztec is just ludicrously dumb, especially since they stole most of their shit like Rome.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >It's totally proper perspective and not an attempt to do an "ancient mural style."

                I can't imagine being this defensive.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >no perspective
                There's perspective on that belly, m8. Slapping a hard outline on something in profile doesn't erase the perspective on the internal details. The figure is in perspective.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They barely have any characterization and the mother is barely in three scenes so i can sympathize with that anon. Shit i thought it was aztec bullshit too.

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    at least the animation was nice

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    just gonna rewatch Coraline

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    For being the title characters Wendell and Wild felt like Kronk-tier side villains at best

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah I found their role in the film somewhat underwhelming, which is weird since they were still pretty prominent characters relative to the rest of the cast.

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >that end credits song

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >those lyrics.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >those lyrics.

      Came to this thread just to see if anyone else had this reaction.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >a black trump caricature
    This is weird

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      He was a Boris Johnson caricature actually. It's just hard to tell because Boris Johnson is a Trump caricature.

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Lol I love the character design in this film. That kid was cute.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I fricking love gabby goat and would love a plushie of it

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Who do you ship her with the troony or the black girl? Either eay she's basically homeless now and will do anything for a place to live, anything.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Isn't the school a dormitory/foster home? She'll stay there until graduation, like Kat.

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The songs were awful

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      says you

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >black punk
        >Bad Brains
        The eternal joke continues.
        Also, nice digits.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Haven't seen it yet, but looking up the tracklist, Ma and Pa, Cult of Personality, and Wolf Like Me are great songs.

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >No Siobahn redemption arc

    Feels bad bro.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      She did have a redemption arc though. She was fully redeemed.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      She was never really that bad; well-meaning but pushy and insensitive. Naive too.

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I just finished watching it. Animation was great, pacing was off-kilter, the ending petered off like the movie ran out of budget and couldn't finish proper.

    Kat's line delivery is awkward, for being the eponymous characters, Wendell and Wild have such a weak and superfluous presence, and Raul's part in the film felt so out-of-place when a few changes could have fixed that.

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The first 2/3s of the movie were good and actually cool, until the last 20 minutes where it unironically becomes
    "We have to stop the evil bulldozers from destroying our town to build a mini mall or Prison, quick throw snowballs at the zombies".

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I thought this movie would be more popular

    It didn't had the Disney logo avobe, this will be forgotten in 2 weeks when Zootopia+ drops

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >This movie
    >Dragon prince
    >lastman
    I don't have time to watch this much stuff

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Gotta say I love how this went the opposite direction of Laika. By the time Kubo and Missing Link came around, a lot of the time it was impossible to tell if you were looking at stop motion or cgi. It could be neat, but something was lost. With this, it felt more blatantly stop motion throughout. The power of a good director.

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How to fix this script
    >Cut the private prison plot
    >Cut the demon hunter janitor
    >Literally just focus on the amusement park
    >Have the plot be stopping the zombies and the resolution be working with the demons to bring jobs back to the community through the amusement park

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Cut the plot
      You work for Disney, don't you?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The plot sucked, got no development or screentime, went nowhere, and ended in a punch-up between 6 unnamed characters with no speaking lines and no known motivations and the main cast.

        Frick the plot. It was a gigantic waste of space and time. Frick's sake Siobhan existing to rat out her parents basically made the character being psychic irrelevant, so the plot actively mooted the main character's fricking development. I've no fricking idea how you frick up your story that badly.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I have no idea how the person who made Nope could frick anything up this badly.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I think he was working more as a producer on this one, and it was more Selick’s baby.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Sellick fricking up makes even less sense to me.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah. I'd really love to know what changed from the unpublished book to the final film. It's possible Selick was in over his head with this one.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Sellick fricking up makes even less sense to me.

              Yeah. I'd really love to know what changed from the unpublished book to the final film. It's possible Selick was in over his head with this one.

              >how could Sellick frick up?
              Monkeybone prepared me for this. At least the art direction was neat.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I mean frick's sake they didn't even need the zombie witnesses to take down the parents because they ordered their workers to kill protesters in front of protesters, media, and the governor. The main character was more or less incidental to the whole damn plot other than killing her parents which led to the memorial where all the brewery workers could be killed, which probably could have just been done on a day of the week ending in -y, and summoning the demons, which their father demonstrates was completely unnecessary.

          Let's go over the conflict and resolution assuming no MC.
          >Klaxons want to build a prison
          >They find out about demon zombies because demons came to earth (doesn't require MC)
          >They hire the demons to resurrect the old guard
          >Old guard vote to demolish the town
          >Their popular daughter gathers a bunch of friends/allies to protest her parents
          >Demon daddy pops up looking for his sons and they get dragged back to hell
          >Her parents flip out and order the zombies to kill the protesters
          >Protesters defeat zombies
          >Parents go to jail for multiple counts of attempted murder
          The main character is superfluous to the entire fricking film.

          Wendell and Wild are almost as fricking pointless seeing as they only really serve as a vehicle for getting the cream into the service of the Klaxons. How in the frick are the protagonist and the titular deuteragonists the least important parts of your fricking film?

          This is bad writing.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It would've been nice if the psychic stuff ended up being more useful, but in the end the purpose of that was that she got a generic "You're The Chosen One Buffy... I Mean Kat" package of powers... which she ignored in the minute after using them to make a deal with bumbling demons waving around hair cream. She didn't want any part of the "Hellmaiden" nonsense, she just wanted her parents. If psychic powers let her contact some demons for a deal, score, but beyond that she didn't give a frick.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Also the other Hell maiden has a powers to travel by black goo, but it didn't help one time during the movie.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              It's a Buffy-style "You're the Chosen One to Hunt Demons" package, given to people with no interest in hunting demons.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I seriously expected this to be the plot, the demons had an idea that they literally said would have people lining up, the town had a problem with a lack of jobs, HOW was the resolution not "demons build theme park on town and help revitalize it"?

      Hell, they could have tied it up with the theme of closure by having the money be real and have them offer the money to the MC to rebuild the brewery but they meet in the middle and they have charity events at the new theme park like his dad used to have for the library.

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >New stop motion movie by the Coraline director
    >That great stylized look of Wendell and Wild
    >The ugly ass designs for the two actual MCs
    >Trans shit

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I watched this with a friend, and then we watched James and the giant peach to compare.

    Can't believe I gave so much more of a shit about bugs being friends with a little kid than I did about a teenager with dead parents trying to stop the prison industrial complex with powers from hell. Actually fricking unreal how much more emotionally distressing a kid standing up to a purple rhino was compared to a teenager seeing her necro parents.

    What the frick happened with Sellick, man?

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Mega?

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What was with the bear?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What bear?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Bear-zelbub

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Lol oh yeah. In my defense, I was still half-asleep when I first read that. Was thinking of Brave for some reason.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It marks girls as Hell Maidens and then pairs them with demons. That's all the explanation we're given.

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >troony kid
    Pass

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I just wanted more Wendell & Wild…

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I have deals with them. I like the demons wanting to keep their promise or say they can't take the money. Promises are very important to demons. I feel they should have played more of trickster demons.

      I'm struggling to find why exactly they are her specific demons.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >>I'm struggling to find why exactly they are her specific demons.
        Because Bear-zelbub marked her for them. The teddy bear was like a demonic agent matching up demons to maidens.

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The soundtrack is fricking nice, both the punk songs and the background music. Selick brought back the same composer who did Coraline's.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I found it odd, that the dad introduced her to the music then later showing "Raul"

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I get the feeling Selick didn’t know what to do with the parents after they were revived, which is kiiind of an issue when that was THE driving force behind Kat’s actions. Beautiful movie, but that script is all over the place.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The parents could have had dead people joke like the priest eyeball or something. I think they're just slow and that's as far as being dead goes.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            They've only been dead for five years. It made sense for them to be mostly put together. Plus, any zombie jokes with them might've killed the emotional impact with their scenes. The undead council members were just plot devices, so the filmmakers were free to have some fun with them.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The most obvious and healthy use for the parent characters would have been to not bring them back to life at all. For example Kat makes peace with not being able to get closure in that extreme and clumsy fashion, and makes the choice of using a critical amount of remaining cream to revive the brewery workers who can be witnesses to prosecute Karen and Black Trump and save the day

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I need to see more concept art. This shit looks cool as hell.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                cool

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Damn, Raul used to be a frickin' qt.π before she turned into a dude

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It’s like they made the most seamless transition from concept to the screen. I love stop-motion.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              That goat is so fricking cute

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Gabby goat plushies when?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Only time will tell if Netflix sees the value in that and acts on it quickly enough. Wendell & Wild's window of relevance only has another couple of months at best.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Jesus Christ, what godawful designs. The chinese girl is the only one that looks even remotely human.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Damn, Mama was STACKED

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      For real?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        on god

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Did anyone ripped that Wendell & Wild Art Stream from Gallery nucleus twitch channel?

    Wanted to watch it but it doesn't seem to be there anymore

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The movie feels like it was written around a bunch of progressive talking points. The ironic thing is it's actually handled well, but there's just too many different talking points that the story becomes unwieldy. It's in dire need of judicious story editing, but they didn't want to drop any of their pet causes. For something with so many ideas, it needed to make the commentary pithy and whimsical. It's a British specialty, but not something we're good at.
    On the plus side, this movie feels more like a true spiritual successor to Coraline than any of the other Laika films, and illustrates clearly why Coraline is their only real hit.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I wouldn't have much of a problem with that, but the movie doesn't feel written "around" the themes, they really feel forced as attention-grabbing seasoning on top of a very simple framework. Most people talking about how "unwieldy" the story is risk ending up making that sort of a compliment, just how people used to mock stuff like Subnormality comics because of their verbosity but the author and the fans interpreted it as an intellectual plus and doubled down on it, instead of acknowledging the possibility of it being a sign of ineffective storytelling.

      The story in this thing is ridiculously simple, but the peppering of topical, attention-grabbing themes and quirks scatters whatever little there is for an audience to actually latch onto in terms of memorable characterization or story.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So what was this about? Because Helley wouldn't let him collect more demons?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Now that you mention it, that deadnaming scene does feel unnecessary once you realize Siobhan isn't a mean girl after all. I guess it shows she can be oblivious, but she was always a good person, albeit one with no sense of boundaries. Maybe we're reading into it and it was just a way to give the film a more realistic vibe with an accidental microaggression.

        Look at how dhe calls Kat, KK. They scene they do it, it sort of looks bullying but it's just a nickname. In the end of the movie the last time she says KK there's genuine comcern in her voice.

        Well, the thing is it could be "Oh-- sorry!!! I-I keep forgetting" or "Oh SORRY. I keep F O R G E T T I N G" you know.

        What's weird about that is that the delivery is so flat (clearly an issue with the voice actress in general) than you can interpret it both as a real apology or a mock apology. And the scene is staged so neutrally in terms of animation that you don't quite get a clue there either (the other girls just literally stand around without a change of expression). So I honestly don't know if that was really CLEVER writing, in which you don't get what to think handed to you, or just generally bad filmmaking.

        The general writing style for the movie and the fact that nothing much comes out of that girl as a character except for functional stuff regarding the general plot makes me lean towards the latter.

        Well there's the thing that the trans kid says they "used" to be friends. You keep assuming an issue there but in the end if you're supposed to interpret everything she says as innocent, what's stopping them from still being friends?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I think it's a Sasha from Amphibia situation. The blonde girl subconsciously wants Romona to be a Debbie like her. So she probably had to separate to find his true self and that probably created a rift between them.

          Correct me if I'm worng but didn't Raul said he had a crush on her?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Well there's the thing that the trans kid says they "used" to be friends.
          Raul having a crush on her and not actually liking the activities of their friend group.

          Classic case of I don't want to be your friend, I want to be your boyfriend. They don't have enough in common if they aren't going to be in a relationship and Raul's not looking to hang out with them just for funsies after trying it once and finding he didn't like it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >but the peppering of topical, attention-grabbing themes and quirks scatters whatever little there is for an audience to actually latch onto in terms of memorable characterization or story.
        Except all the giant complains and problems with the film is that it has none of these.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >and illustrates clearly why Coraline is their only real hit
      Why's that? I thought ParaNorman was decent. Flawed, but decent.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I wouldn't have much of a problem with that, but the movie doesn't feel written "around" the themes, they really feel forced as attention-grabbing seasoning on top of a very simple framework. Most people talking about how "unwieldy" the story is risk ending up making that sort of a compliment, just how people used to mock stuff like Subnormality comics because of their verbosity but the author and the fans interpreted it as an intellectual plus and doubled down on it, instead of acknowledging the possibility of it being a sign of ineffective storytelling.

      The story in this thing is ridiculously simple, but the peppering of topical, attention-grabbing themes and quirks scatters whatever little there is for an audience to actually latch onto in terms of memorable characterization or story.

      I think the main issue is that the story is a true ensemble but the movie can't be - the story itself isn't about Kat but about the town and the people in it. In a more drawn out telling of the story you'd have much longer segments from each vantage point and the different themes and events would be able to drive the character's actions naturally.
      As it is the movie rushes through what should be its connective tissue in order to fit all the major beats in.

      Should have been a miniseries.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Should have been a miniseries.
        Yep, that seems to be what we all agree on.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The older I get, the more I realize movies as a medium are a sham for proper storytelling. Make it tight as a virgin goldfish or make a fricking series.

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Lol was there literally one white character in this movie?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I think you could count the two nuns as white. Although they're so bizarre it's hard to consider thek himan characters.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It just seemed weird she is at this preppy catholic school with no white people like really? Like how many asian, indian or black catholics do you know? Her being the only black girl at the school could of also emphasized her outsider aspect but everyone in the world are minorities for no inexplicable reason.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Could be a Peele thing I guess, he likes to build casts like that. There's always white people but not necessarily proportional to hard demographic data or anything, unless that's the point like in Get Out.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's the Catholic school clinging to life after the whole town packed up and moved. That's kinda the whole point of why Father Bests was desperate enough to work with Lex Luthor, there was almost nobody left in town, and nobody with money they were willing to give him.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >That's kinda the whole point of why Father Bests was desperate enough to work with Lex Luthor
            It was weird how they kept flipflopping between him being a reluctant villain to save his school or actively malicious himself and then he just dies a second time and no one gives a shit. The school wasn't really portrayed as a bad place to go, and he didn't really mistreat the students either. It'd be one thing to treat him as a true villain if the school was particularly shitty but it wasn't and the students even seemed to like him.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              There's kind of a moral there though. If you ally yourself with evil, it's not going to matter if you were a "reluctant villain" or straight-out-evil yourself, and nobody'll give a frick when you die.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Doesn't that kind of go against the whole restorative justice message though?

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If you think the villain plot to guarantee more child prisoners was heavy handed or too in your face you're either not an American or you're just a bit sheltered because that was an actual real scandal and it still isn't fully resolved. We busted someone just a few years ago for literally selling minors to bigger prisons that wanted the labor and funding. We still didn't create any laws or policies to keep it from continuing, and there's still no effort to reinvestigate the huge number of young inmates around the country who were probably locked up on flimsy pretenses to begin with, shit is insane. Why is this one of the very few movies where that's talked about, when it's been a major issue for years?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You forgot to mention the guy busted for feeding kids to prisons for kickbacks was a judge.

      >Why is this one of the few movies where it's talked about?
      Americans writ large are a vengeful people that have been fed a steady diet of "tough on crime!" propaganda for more than half a century. Good luck trying to have a nuanced discussion about the merits of rehabilitation vs punishment with a people that actively campaigned to make it legal to execute the moronic

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Governor literally named Governor Bribes

    I'm surprised nobody has ever done this before, but from some googling it doesn't look like it.

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Irmgerd's pterodactyl scream when she sees Siobahn with the protestors

    Gets me every time

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is there any reason *why* the villains were British? It didn't go anywhere and it wasn't even a source of jokes. Maybe they thought making them American was too obvious?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Having the main villain be literally Trump would've been a bit too heavy-handed. Boris Johnson? You're up.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Is that why they made the husband black?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's not a 1:1 thing.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It’s a really old villain trope that they probably weren’t overthinking.

      Though now that I’m overthinking it, I wonder if it kinda fricks with their messages, making the baddies a couple of foreigners.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's more odd that they went with them being British and no one so much as comments on it, despite their obvious 'Britishnss' like having a building shaped like Tower Bridge. No one calls them tea drinkers or limeys or whatever. Is this what hispanic people feel like when SJWs try to pander to them?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Maybe they're suppose to resemble no one at all, since shitty capitalism can come from enywhere.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I don't agree since one is quite clearly a parody of Boris Johnson, which is completely irrelevant to the movie. Boris himself is guilty of capitalist villainy but not the kind that's presented in the movie, which again just makes me wonder why they bothered with him?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I could be VERY wrong, but the Klaxons felt more like a nod to the puppets of Spitting Image. Boris Johnson happens to be the most recognizable Spitting Image figure in recent years, so it ended up being Boris.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Even with one of them being black, the image of a ibdigenous brown aztec warrior woman fighting a blonde snake with blue eyes give off the impression of what they are meant to represent to the viewers

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              The hydra was blue with red eyes, what does that mean?

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous
  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  72. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  73. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  74. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  75. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      havent watched this yet but does this ship have crossover appeal potential?

      It's more odd that they went with them being British and no one so much as comments on it, despite their obvious 'Britishnss' like having a building shaped like Tower Bridge. No one calls them tea drinkers or limeys or whatever. Is this what hispanic people feel like when SJWs try to pander to them?

      i kind of miss that era of unabashed racism when every cartoon had an offensive british stereotype who for some reason lived in america

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Anon, ANYTHING has crossover appeal if you try enough.

        ...But yes, I could see them.
        Pic unrelated. I hope.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I think a Coraline/Kat relationship would look like Kat being the edgy aloof upperclassman, and Coraline at best would be a dweeby suckup kid that looks up to her.

        Kat is a hardened juvie kid who has committed actual crimes, and Coraline is a slightly quirky suburbanite from a stable home. They’re from completely different worlds. Not that that means it couldn’t work.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Kat's all talk. She achieved damn little herself. Coraline took out the Beldam. If Kat tried to push around Coraline like she did Raul, Coraline would stand up for herself.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Strictly speaking she achieved nothing herself. Even her attempt at demon summoning ended up with Wendell and Wild coming to the surface on their own like their dad because the tunnel collapsed.

            Raul revived her parents. She didn't have anything to do with stopping Wendell an Wild's Dad. Siobhan discovered the plan to destroy the town and she was only mildly involved in the final fight (she pulled a lever at Helley's direction which arguably wasn't necessary because Wendell and Wild were capable of stopping another bulldozer and helped turn that one).

            So yeah, completely useless.

            >prisons are bad

            Private prisons are bad tho

  76. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  77. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  78. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  79. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  80. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  81. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  82. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  83. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  84. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  85. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  86. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  87. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  88. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  89. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  90. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  91. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Boombox appears for like one scene in the movie
    >Every artist: It's part of her, on a spiritual level

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >appears for like one scene in the movie
      It's a memento from her late father and she specifically brings up keeping it to him so, yes, it's a pretty important item.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        From a fanart perspective though, it gets repetitive when half the art is people going "I'll draw the boombox scene!" It's a good scene, but there's other good scenes to reference.

  92. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  93. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Coupla dapper dans

  94. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I just don't understand why Best's head ended up in his stomach when he died by drowning.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They popped his clogs pretty hard before they dumped him in the pond, so maybe they broke his spine. Or maybe he was contorted into a weird position underwater when rigor mortis set in.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's a cartoony head cave in effect like from tom and jerry. He was hit over the head with a golf club.

  95. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  96. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This film was a mess. They crammed in way too many plot threads in and nothing had a chance to breathe. The main character wasn't likeable and her friend had no character arc at all. Then at the end, everything gets resolved in 1 second because of the mural.

    The private prison thing was really forced in.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The private prison thing was the actual main conflict. That shit was the plot. The film was such a mess you didn't realize that.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The film literally only had 2 lines where you were told they were a bad thing. Was such a mess.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >It only had two lines explaining why the prisons are bad
          >Definitely
          >There definitely weren't more than that

          ...Are you mentally moronic?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Mc tells rich British girl why they're bad. Rich British girl tells her parents.

            That's it. For the rest of the film the prison is just a reason to bulldoze the town.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Yes...? What, you wanted a tour of the prisons? The villains literally confess "yup, they're shit prisons that you never really leave for long, we make tons of cash, and we're trying to ensure that the next generation march straight in there too!" That's pretty much all the explanation needed for why the prison's a bad thing.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This film was a mess. They crammed in way too many plot threads in and nothing had a chance to breathe. The main character wasn't likeable and her friend had no character arc at all. Then at the end, everything gets resolved in 1 second because of the mural.

        The private prison thing was really forced in.

        Perhaps you're just dumb? It made perfect sense to me. Klax Corp wanted to build private prisons in Rust Bank. We got a whole scene with Siobahn spelling out why the Klax Corp prisons are bad. The Elliots went "Nope" and had the clout to hold it off with their brewery. Then the Elliots died and the brewery burned down, so the only thing holding back the prison development was a handful of city council members that got outvoted because there's nothing in the town charter that says zombies can't vote.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Your missing the point. It could have been to build a shopping mall, it could have been a polluting factory. It was just a maguffin and that's all it needed to be.

          By forcing in an under-developed "private prisons BAD" message and hammering the audience over the head with it, it just made a film with poorly developed characters and way too many plot elements, even more bloated

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Your missing the point.
            >Your
            Your point is bad. A private prison works better as a death-sentence to a happy town in comparison to a shopping mall, and the "school to prison pipeline" ties in nicely with the school that's a big part of the setting.

            If they'd gone with a polluting factory you'd be here saying "By forcing in an under-developed 'polluting factories BAD' message and hammering the audience over the head with it..."

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You do realize that if you asked someone to predict whether beating up 6 zombies on bulldozers or convincing the mountain sized demon and father of the titular characters to go in peace with a mural projected across the town from the highest spot in the city while returning his kidnapped family to him where one of the main characters in a scene that ends with the death of one of the main cast is the climax of the plot, everyone and their brother that hasn't seen the film is going to say the latter, right?

          The main conflict didn't get the dramatic focus it needed. It barely involved the main character. Kat and her parents LITERALLY NEVER SEE THE KLAXONS.

          Which makes that fricking epilogue of the brewery getting rebuilt with signage of her angelic parents beheading them all the more ironic. Raul had an obvious hateboner for them for destroying his town and working against his mother for years, but Kat had no idea shit was going down until she got back, never fricking met them, and the Klaxons weren't even involved in the main harm against her. Wendell and Wild and her dad's shitty driving wrecked her family, unless she's that busted up against losing the brewery without knowing it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Kat and her parents LITERALLY NEVER SEE THE KLAXONS.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            This would make for a fun bit of movie trivia.
            >What do Fifth Element and Wendell and Wild have in common?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Kat and her parents LITERALLY NEVER SEE THE KLAXONS.
            Now that you point it out, that's a pretty big misstep. The hero never has a face-to-face confrontation with the villains? The villains aren't even aware of who the threat to their plot is?

            Should have made room for that instead of following the generational trauma trend by squeezing in the scared father, rebellious and unloved sons subplot.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I didn’t notice it while watching the film, but I actually kinda like it, now that I’m thinking about it. It’s sorta relatable in a way, that the big bad villains are the heads of this powerful corporation, and the MC never sees them, because corporate heads are usually pretty untouchable to common people, and they have to be defeated by dismantling their systems rather than face to face.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I don't see the need for it. They're the shit of the world, there's nothing that can be added by putting in a scene with them meeting. Kat would point out they're shit, they'd get angry and say she'll be sorry, blah blah blah, in the end what matters is they were defeated. The important stuff was her being able to show her parents what'll happen to Rust Bank when they're gone.

  97. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  98. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Look for fanart
    >There's a LITTLE on twitter, but surprisingly not much
    >Apparently a thriving fandom on tumblr

    In hindsight... nope, still seems weird.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Tumblr is like Father Bests. We keep declaring it dead, then it shows up for work the next day.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      isn't twitter in an odd place right now because musk bought it and is starting to ruin it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Elon Musk literally hasn't done anything or made any changes to twitter yet.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          He's dissolved the entire board of directors and fired pretty much everyone in a position of power. He's currently running the whole thing, Napoleon style, while advertisers are looking at his tweets and bailing because the dude's crazy enough to start saying he IS Napoleon.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            And not a single part of that has any affect on Twitter or it's users yet, beyond the fired employees obviously.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              i thought he was planning charging people 20 bucks a month to stay verified , although that might have been taken out of context

  99. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  100. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why did the film never address that fricking apple?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What's there to address? Candied apples are fricking evil. The candy coating covers up any problems with the apple. It can be rotten and wormy as frick and you won't know until you take a bite.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You would say that. You're just part of the carnie-cotton-candy complex!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Why did the film never address that fricking apple?
      Because it was a rewritten scene. Wendel and Wild were the worms. That's why the MC's young when they have a vision of her. Worms probably originally had their heads.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You very briefly see their silhouettes in the flashback monster fight bit

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I think I remember a brief clip of the worm having their heads in the trailer.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Anyone able to fact check this?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Dunno about the trailer but the original version of the scene only had a singleheaded worm and involved an oncoming car that the dad swerved to avoid instead of a turn in the bridge.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Could only find a trailer with the flashback silhouette scene. And in that the worm does look like W&W.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              That strikes me more as foreshadowing of "two horrible things" in her future, not as a rewrite.

  101. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >for no reason , here's tower bridge!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      curse those foreigners constantly coming to our shores and milking the 13th amendment

  102. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  103. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Cool seeing a few artists with their own takes. Think this is my favorite Kat.

  104. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Who in the frick builds a bridge with a turn on it and who in the frick turns around while driving on a bridge with a turn on it at night during a storm?

    I appreciate the parents telling their daughter it wasn't her fault. It literally wasn't. It was the dad's fricking fault. Eyes on the fricking road. Zombie dad should have taken responsibility for fricking up.
    >But she screamed
    But he has brakes and it takes a few seconds to get across a bridge. Kids fricking scream. Distractions happen while driving. She didn't block his vision. He turned his ass around.

    >You were only 8
    Frick off. You were driving.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You are too hung up on it being the dad’s fault.

      The film makers were clearly going for a very specific kind of tragic accident. But they couldn’t make the reason for the crash be the dad swerving so that he wouldn’t hit a puppy in the middle of the bridge, because then it would be too much like Beetlejuice. So they had to improvise, and this is what they came up with.

      It’s not that complicated, and the important thing is that all of the characters recognize the incident as an unfortunate freak accident (except for when Kat blames herself). You can blame the dad all you want, but the role he played in the matter is really not important within the story itself.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >the role he played in the matter is really not important within the story itself.
        Kat's entire story arc is overcoming trauma stemming from her parents' deaths. Him taking responsibility as the adult and driver in the situation instead of just saying she's not responsible because she was a kid is reprehensible.

        I've got a half second cousin once removed (I think the math's right on that?) that was in a wreck with their parent as a toddler and the parent always did that bullshit where they subtlety shifted the blame and then used their son's age to negate it and it SERIOUSLY fricked their kid up. If you frick up, you own it.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Oh so you’re projecting. Okay.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I'm making a correct moral evaluation. I'm not projecting.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              You are literally overlaying your own personal family problems over a movie and allowing that unique view to influence your judgement. That is the definition of projection.

              It’s okay, though. You have issues you need to process. That’s valid.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You are literally overlaying your own personal family problems over a movie
                Kat's fricked up by the guilt IN THE MOVIE.
                >and allowing that unique view to influence your judgement.
                I was horrified by the pass the buck behavior already upon encountering it within my family. This isn't shaped by consequences within my family. You don't fricking know me so I don't know why you would assume that just because this shit happened in my family it must have shaped my worldview. b***h, I found out about this shit in my 30s. My world view was set.

                And I wouldn't project her onto the film because she was tailoring how much blame she was foisting onto her son to who which relative she was talking to. She was a snake doing much worse shit than in the film. The parents in the film are just poorly written.

                >That is the definition of projection.
                This is the definition of you talking out of your ass. Don't presume to know people.

  105. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Be serial killer
    >Die
    >Go to hell
    >Go to the same "best afterlife!" theme park that the folks from heaven get to go to

    Okay but Buffalo Belzer was right, his sons are idiots.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >heaven
      Within the mythology of this universe, I’m not sure there is one.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They say there is at one point

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I think Wendell at one point refers to an “upstairs,” but I thought he was talking about The Land of the Living.

  106. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Feel like her parents died a very stupid death. Mom just lmaoing the window without helping her husband

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Her plan was to get Kat out then unbuckle her husband and get him out.

      She got step 1 done, then Game Overed while fumbling with step 2. She didn't wait to get Kat out because the car was sinking by the second, and every second she waited it would be harder for Kat to get to the surface.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Kat drowned anyway and got pulled up by a cop or something. Which is kinda weird due to her watching the car sing deeper and waiting for her parents u n d e r w a t e r

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Feel like her parents died a very stupid death. Mom just lmaoing the window without helping her husband

        I just don't like that it was caused by the weird worm and her scream
        Makes it feel like an abandoned plot thread instead of a terrible accident (or a set up by the klaxons)

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Are the Klaxons above murdering an 8-year-old girl?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            No.

            But I also don’t see them as being such 5d chess masters that they would plant a worm into a candied apple, knowing that at just the right moment the little girl would discover it and scream, causing her father to crash their car off a bridge.

            They would probably just blow up the bridge or something and try to play it off as an accident.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            They weren't above murdering their daughter.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Sometimes people just die and there's nothing deeper there.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            That's fine, then don't use a demonic two headed worm to cause the cras

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              The worm didn't cause the crash. The dad did. 8 year olds scream.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              The animation went over-the-top in depicting the worm, but at the end of the day it was just a worm that made her scream that made her dad crash because the weather was shitty and they were on a bridge. If you don't want stuff like heavily stylized horror-worms, stay away from stylized animation. Maybe just watch, I dunno, Pantheon or something that keeps the animation as plain as possible.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I think it was a chain reaction that they knew they had to take advantage of the deaths of the brewery owners.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah the 2 headed worm really felt like it was supposed to be a connection to Wendell and Wild, but I guess it wasn't? I know 2 headed mutations in animals exist in real life, but it still feels weird to show something like that in a movie and just leave it as a coincidence... Unless it's supposed to be some sort of symbolism for the Original Sin? (2 headed worm resembles a snake tongue coming out of an apple) but that seems like a stretch.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You think THAT'S stupid? Don't watch ONI then.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, it sure was something…

  107. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Never get to see a demon chick that's not in a jar
    Fricking ripoff man.

  108. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This thread is astroturfing

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Found the Brit.

  109. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Some of the resolutions for certain plot points felt super rushed. But overall I enjoyed the movie.

  110. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

  111. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Just watched it with some friends, by the later half we couldn't stop laughing at how bad it was

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You have shitty friends.
      And a shitty self.

  112. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    And then the school-to-prison pipeline scheme.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, exactly.

  113. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Can't believe it took this long for people to start talking about the devil's anus. I almost had to rewind when I watched the film because I couldn't believe what I'd just seen.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Well like I said I couldnt even see it. This doesnt look like anything to me.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, I assumed it was just absurdist nonsense with a second him being in his stomach. I didn't realize it was supposed to be his butthole until someone pointed it out in this thread and I went back and checked. It's a quick shot.

        For as toothless as the film is, that really is a pointless scene.

  114. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I wish I knew all these references.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Well I'm fricking blind. Let us know if you find anything else.

  115. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >People keep claiming the film is sfw
    >Those end music lyrics

    Where the hell do you people work?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What about the lyrics?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Twist a Virgin 'round your dirty little finger
        >Love is gone, but the memory lingers
        >Kill a Virgin with your bloody little finger
        >Ate her innocence and virtue for dinner

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I am positive that these lyrics would have gone right over my stupid head when I was a kid.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >stares in Osmosis Jones

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Her hair is short
          >Her legs are brown
          >Her lips are full
          >Her head hangs down
          >Her eyes are blue
          >Her ass is round
          >Her breasts are sweet
          >And she wears a frown

  116. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Did... did Kat kill that fat kid?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I hope so

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That’s my headcanon. But I think it’s left purposefully ambiguous.

      The part where she tells Raul that “people who get close to me die” sounded a lot like she was talking about more than just her parents, though, and that’s about as good an explanation as any for somebody else in her life biting the dust.

  117. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >less prisons, more beer

  118. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Unironically why was the movie called Wendell and Wild? They were basically a b plot.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Catchier title than “KayKay’s Crazy Adventure as a Hell Maiden in Catholic School.”

      Though that one anon who proposed the title should be Hell Kat may have been on to something.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Because they were voiced by the main attractions to the movie. You expect Key and Peele to steal the show.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The comic relief get the title, but are just the comic relief
      Many such cases.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It’s like how The Barber of Seville isn’t really the protagonist. Everyone knows they are really there to see Figaro so you might as well market that.

      If Wendell and Wild were in the old commedia del art, they would be the harlequin.

  119. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Glad to see plenty of fanart. Was worried we'd have another CGI He-Man moment where Cinemaphile got hyped up in advance then nobody drew anything and it didn't even get noticed.

  120. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    first end credits song is stuck in my head

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's pretty damn good. Tamar-Kali deserves more love.

  121. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What even is a hellmaiden?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Some variation of the "mystic chosen one" you see in YA novels and monster of the week shows like Buffy. Arguably wasn't SUPER useful to her, but beats getting stuck with The Shining.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Not explained, but from what I can gather, it's your standard demonic consort ie witch.
      >magic powers
      >consorts with demons
      >demonic mark
      >capable of making a demonic pact
      Literally every introduced element is drawn from modern understanding of witch folklore.

      Frick she even floats instead of sinks to start the story.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I wish they woulda called the bearzelbub a poppet instead of making up the cutesy hot topic toy name for it. “Poppet” would fit with the witch theme and attach it to real life folk lore, making it more recognizable.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I'm pretty sure they were using fake names for shit and drawing from popular wrong conceptions of shit in order to avoid stepping on toes. Poppets aren't exactly common knowledge and are used in practicing religion. They'd have called it a familiar if anything, but that term's ALSO used by wiccans so you run into the aforementioned toe stepping.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            If they were trying to be completely inoffensive to anyone of any religion, I think they did a bad job. The lovable side kicks are demons and there’s an evil catholic priest.

  122. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Also if she retained a personal connection with them. Also if they actually showed up for her summon. Also if they actually revived her parents or ever did anything for her. Also if she ever did anything for them. The pact ended up amounting to fricking nothing beyond being an excuse to face her past, something you don't need a curse for a normal character to need to do.

  123. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    test

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *