Timekino with minimal exposition and nice cinematography and cool characters. You will rewatch it a bunch of times. Also look up the Sator Square from Pompeii.
Cool visuals and action, very weak and poorly written characters and dialogue. They made the questionable choice of having the protagonist be a nameless blank slate and barely a character at all.
>minimal exposition
This is bait, right? Way too much of the movie is spent on exposition, people standing around talking and trying to justify setting up an action setpiece
>scientist lady spends ten minutes explaining Tenet rules to hot sauce man >Robert Pattinson's role is "exposition man" >hot sauce man is such an exposition receptacle they never even give him a name
Can someone explain the reverse bit? As in how it works. Didnt make much sense at all. It just happened randomly all over the place for no good reason like magic.
>step through rotating door machine >you're now moving backward in time instead of forward like you usually do >world looks like its going in reverse, but its actually you going backward in time >go through one of those rotating door machines again >time is now going forward again but you're farther back in time than when you started
Basically instead of instantly traveling back or forward in time like in most movies you're simply reversing or advancing, flipping it like a switch
That was a gun going backwards in time, but they were moving forward in time. The movie didn't explain it, but hypothetically someone going backwards would have had to go into that range, fire the round, put the gun down and leave, then MC and the girl come in and play with backwards gun and make it reverse through the bullet firing while the MC thinks he's just firing it regular.
They're moving backwards through time so they unfire instead of firing. So when you want to fire one you're pulling it back out of the target into your gun instead of shooting it out of it
basic time travel story told in the most obtuse way possible to appear deep or smarter than it actually is but i guess that's kinda all of nolans movies
The only thing I liked about it was the score, and a few of the visuals. The rest was pretty mediocre. I actually regretted wasting the time to watch it.
Timekino with minimal exposition and nice cinematography and cool characters. You will rewatch it a bunch of times. Also look up the Sator Square from Pompeii.
>minimal exposition
They literally stop every 10 minutes to do more exposition
Cool visuals and action, very weak and poorly written characters and dialogue. They made the questionable choice of having the protagonist be a nameless blank slate and barely a character at all.
>minimal exposition
This is bait, right? Way too much of the movie is spent on exposition, people standing around talking and trying to justify setting up an action setpiece
People talking =/= exposition
Yes it is. If two characters stand there while one explains all kinds of stuff that has already happened that they never show then that is exposition
>scientist lady spends ten minutes explaining Tenet rules to hot sauce man
>Robert Pattinson's role is "exposition man"
>hot sauce man is such an exposition receptacle they never even give him a name
>there are examples therefore it bad
Perhaps Nolan's worst film
a bloated convoluted mess with a few cool shots/setpieces
and probably this though it's arguable
Pure cinema
Hot sauce
Can someone explain the reverse bit? As in how it works. Didnt make much sense at all. It just happened randomly all over the place for no good reason like magic.
>step through rotating door machine
>you're now moving backward in time instead of forward like you usually do
>world looks like its going in reverse, but its actually you going backward in time
>go through one of those rotating door machines again
>time is now going forward again but you're farther back in time than when you started
Basically instead of instantly traveling back or forward in time like in most movies you're simply reversing or advancing, flipping it like a switch
what about the bullets? like the first time that girl showcased it to the MC?
That was a gun going backwards in time, but they were moving forward in time. The movie didn't explain it, but hypothetically someone going backwards would have had to go into that range, fire the round, put the gun down and leave, then MC and the girl come in and play with backwards gun and make it reverse through the bullet firing while the MC thinks he's just firing it regular.
They're moving backwards through time so they unfire instead of firing. So when you want to fire one you're pulling it back out of the target into your gun instead of shooting it out of it
basic time travel story told in the most obtuse way possible to appear deep or smarter than it actually is but i guess that's kinda all of nolans movies
fucking garbage, like every other Nolan movie
Shut up, pseud.
A futuristic Bond flick with an inexplicable black fellow in the middle of every scene. Pattinson was the protagonist.
This movie drove a friend and I crazy for an hour on acid
we then almost killed ourselves trying to start a 40 year old propane grill
horrible movie, made no sense
The only thing I liked about it was the score, and a few of the visuals. The rest was pretty mediocre. I actually regretted wasting the time to watch it.
This was one of the best video qualities I have seen it looked amazing in dolby vision
wonder what other movies are like that
makes no fucking sense
A neponagger who can't act and constant BWAAAAAAAAAM
probably lots of confusion, but also some really cool action and cinematography.
reading a book