What did he mean by this?

What did he mean by this?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Weet ik

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    He's a virtue signaling turd.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      easy access to twitter and a pulpit to preach from has really exposed a lot of these scum of society actors

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >you are not allowed to like the Empire
      Ukraine will be a military power will all the shit they are getting from the west and Russia is depleted and stuck with decaying destroyed shit.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Seriously, frick Russia

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yeah, but also frick Ukraine, frick the USA, frick NATO and frick the EU.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This. The US is cancer.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Israel is the cancer. US is a puppet.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This. The US is cancer.

        >you know what? now that russia is losing, I realized I hate every side!
        oh /misc/gays

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Now that my israeli overlords told me invasion is bad, f-frick Russia
          >what about the Iraq invasion?
          >that's different
          Kys you hypocritical homosexual

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >implying people were not mad about the war in Iraq
            nice revisionism

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Biden voted for it. I guess sanctions should be put on the US in response.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Look at the hypocrisy again. At that time every American bought the whole "WMD" bullshit your moronic President spouted. On the contrary anyone who disapproved of the invasion ( calling it a war is disingenuous) was viewed as a traitor.

                >let me tell you what happened in America even though I don't live there and I hate it

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >gets called out for being a hypocritical b***h
                >no counter argument
                >resorts to wojack spam
                Sad!

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >doesn't listen to reason
                >resorts to name-calling
                >absolutely no arguments
                >gets mad at drawings
                yup, a vatBlack person alright.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >trys to be morally superior after posting wojacks
                Nice try tubby.
                You have yet to provide a logical argument. Read the thread again carefully and this time try to get your head out of your ass before doing so. You got BTFO when I mentioned the US' hypocrisy over the Iraq invasion you had to resort to moronic ad hominem arguments about not residing in the US, as if that is any criteria to criticize them. Lmao at your stupidity.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i literally haven't said anything about russia, only ukraine. keep arguing with the voices in your head, hohol

                >don't care about what third-worlders think
                Well at least you got one thing correct. No one cares what the US thinks either.

                >t.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >can't imagine someone disagreeing with him and not being part of his strawman
                crazy how saying you don't care for X means you're defined by a love you never expressed for Y. almost like it's actually a coping mechanism when faced with opinions you can't process into neat boxes like a child

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                don't know what that means. anyway, what will you wear at your city's next gay pride parade?

                keep coping, b***hes

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                cope with your mulatto transsexual grandchildren

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                There's 10 dead Ukrainians to every 1 Russian tho...

                >anyone who thinks the US is cancer is a ruskie
                This is some 80s level of "everyone who i don't like is a commie"

                >resorts to more crudely drawn cartoons
                This would be hilarious if it weren't so pathetic

                lol

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                There's 10 dead Ukrainians to every 1 Russian tho...

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >pads his numbers with civies
                russian bastard.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >resorts to more crudely drawn cartoons
                This would be hilarious if it weren't so pathetic

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                don't know what that means. anyway, what will you wear at your city's next gay pride parade?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >anyone who thinks the US is cancer is a ruskie
                This is some 80s level of "everyone who i don't like is a commie"

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You people are as naive and stupid as all those leftist Western commies, yes.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >he says while being spoonfed Western propaganda

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Many such cases, israelites are playing both sides against each other as usual

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                your grandchildren will be mulatto transsexuals

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                how does it feel that the russian army is losing to transexual redditor liberals? I'd feel pretty bad
                lmao

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                not a russian, so i don't care. again, not everyone who hates you is a russian

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Not a russian but you sure are peeved about the fact that Russia is getting it's ass kicked lmao
                >not everyone who hates you is a russian
                I don't care about what third-worlders think

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i literally haven't said anything about russia, only ukraine. keep arguing with the voices in your head, hohol

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >don't care about what third-worlders think
                Well at least you got one thing correct. No one cares what the US thinks either.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Look at the hypocrisy again. At that time every American bought the whole "WMD" bullshit your moronic President spouted. On the contrary anyone who disapproved of the invasion ( calling it a war is disingenuous) was viewed as a traitor.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why must they always associate shit that happens in real life with movies for children?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It’s called symbolism, you will learn about it in junior high one day.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Watch better movies you stupid child

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          what does that have to do with anything

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Using star warts as a reference for anything is childish. There are dozens of other movies you could use instead of this proto capeshit flicks.

            Brainlet retort

            Stay mad star wars nerd. Your precious films were just tools for selling toys

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Do you know what Mark Hamill is most well-known for?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >most

                Voicing Joker and playing Luke Skywalker are literally the only things the guy is known for.

                He was also did Skeletor for Kevin Smith, which was a disaster.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This is a pretty moronic post, my man.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you didnt see who posted the tweet in OP and made a stupid reply, got called out and emarassed and now are grasping at straws. Am i right? Its an anonymous board, you can pretend youve left the thread

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Mark Hamill is most know for playing a character that abandoned his family and friends after he tried to kill a sleeping child of his sister and best friend in his bed.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Reminder all nu wars is homosexual shit

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This, mark hamill should have used another movie franchise, one he has zero personnal connection with, to make his point, tgat would have made much more sense

                So? Does it make it any less childish or moronic?
                And I'm not only talking about Hamill, I'm also talking about the moronic legions of soiwars fans who use the same analogy.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              This, mark hamill should have used another movie franchise, one he has zero personnal connection with, to make his point, tgat would have made much more sense

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Cuz you're forming symbols with them? you are stupid.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Brainlet retort

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      How else can they stay relevant?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I mean the prequel trilogy is pretty much inspired by WWII. Remember that one chancellor dude in both?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You're getting it backwards. The childhood brainwashing comes first, followed by real events.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Uhhh is someone gonna tell him that ukrainians are the real nazi??

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Kek. What a cringey homosexual. Someone post the tweet where he spams the word GAY a hundred times like an autist.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >may the force be with you in polish
    what did he mean by this?

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I am a bismarck

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why is it written in POLISH?

    Is is that famous american education?

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ewoks = Viet cong

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Russia is just like the heckin Empire

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Uhhh empire was actualy fearsome and powerful…

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They got taken out by Ewok's while Russia is getting taken out by a failed state. They are the exact same.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >The Javelin, produced by Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, has gained an iconic role in Ukraine — the shoulder-fired, precision-guided anti-tank missile has been indispensable in combating Russian tanks. But production in the U.S. is low at a rate of around 800 per year, and Washington has now sent some 8,500 to Ukraine, according to the CSIS — more than a decades’ worth of production.
        >https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/28/the-us-and-europe-are-running-out-of-weapons-to-send-to-ukraine.html

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      2 more weeks, chud. Surely now you will use atom.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That would be accurate if the Rebellion had been brutalizing minor provinces on some backwater planet and was full of Imperial Sympathizers.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >"Resist"
    >everyone on social media and their mother supports ukraine
    I JUST DON'T GET IT.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Lol he’s addressing actual ukrainians firming actual resistence in the actual war you american brained imbecile. Americans should be culled

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Didn't ask, thirdie.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      maybe you're moronic

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's honestly funny how online brained you are.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >he actually fell for the antiwhite propaganda against ukraine targeted at boomers
      Return to reddit Black person brain

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You have to RESIST corporate slop, globohomosexual and the alphabet people agenda.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    why did he write it in polish and not ukraine? lmao doenst make any sense unless he is implying hohols are polish clay

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No one cares about your foreign language dumb esl

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://www.erome.com/search?q=seltin

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Russia
    >Empire

    Lol. But I can see them getting stomped by teddy bears with sticks.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    He is trying to imply that ukrainian language doesnt exist (just like their "nation"). It is written in Polish because Poland and Russia will split Ukraine .

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Been following Hamill on social for years, the guy is legitimately braindead.

    The analogy in question is particularly idiotic because unlike the Rebels Ukraine is well trained and armed to the tooth, while Russia proved to be massively overrated and comically incompetent, so more like the First Order.

    On the ideological side,despite the narrative the western media has been pushing since February, the Ukrainian military is basically one big Nazi larp organization and president Zelensky gave up on fighting after certain military figures literally threatened to hang him. .

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Remember when he forced his son's girlfriend to have an abortion?

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    First, why did he write it in Polish and not Ukrainian?
    Second, it's funny because it is Russia which has rebelled against western global hegemony, and it is an underdog. If not for nukes, NATO would already be involved fullscale. But it has to wage a proxy war through Ukraine instead, but the involvement is insane, like nothing else in the past. The sanctiins are unprecedented too. Ukraine is being destroyed in the process, but they never cared about Ukraine, it's just an instrument to them no matter all the propaganda and virtue signaling like this. All the "help" is aimed at war, before the war the West has been plundering Ukraine and every year there was a net outflow of investments. And even if the war somehow stopped now, Ukraine already suffered irreversible and catastrophic economic and demographic damage. EU is done for economically too btw. "To be an enemy of the US is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal"

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      this is your brain on /misc/

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        100% accurate?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          100% wrong 80% seething 20% rusoid propaganda

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >First, why did he write it in Polish and not Ukrainian?

      Both are just dialects of Russian anyway.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >underdog
      BAHAHAHA we are already on the underdog cope after the decades of russia stronk bullshit, that's fricking hillarious.
      Literaly dinduffins on dey way to orthodox mosque.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA holy shit.
        Once Ukrainians reach Moskow they should put Putin in a zoo lmao.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Ahhb this pesky NATO and EU, threatening Russia’s sphere of influence by being incomaringly superior options for it’s former vassal states. Russia is justifed in waging a war against Ukraine lest it joins the western world and becomes slightly less of a shithole.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Russia wouldn't be an underdog if the kleptocrats hadn't stolen the funds meant for military improvements, Putin is moronic and probably inadvertently killed anyone who had a spine who would have told him what a shit military he actually had.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We heckin #RESIST the evil Dark Lord Voldeputler! It's just like in my flippin movies y'all!

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    *joker voice* traaans rights are humaaan riiiights aaahahaaahaaHAHAHAAAAAAAA

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >people defending Hollywood liberals
    >on Cinemaphile

    Moot is rolling in his grave.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Hollywood liberals are just communist wankers, just like russians.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Moot was and is literally a gay troony.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It’s all just getting wag the dog now isn’t it.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Rightoid Qtards are so far gone they are siding with China and Russia just because it goes against the mainstream
    embarrassing

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I side with Russia and China cause i hate the great satan

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If the mainstream is objectively evil then yes.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      /misc/ was never rightoid, /misc/ was always useful idiot farm for whichever astrturf campaign was the most effective at the moment

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You don't know anything about /misc/.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Weird, isn't it? Especially since Russia is perfect leftoid paradise.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        America is the most degenerate place in the world

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah gotta love the fact that Russia is just like San Francisco lol. Frickin idiot.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This is tour brain on /misc/

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            But I'm from Cinemaphile.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Leftoid?
        Traditional family society that's anti-lgbtetc and with extremely unequal wealth distribution?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Russia
          >traditional family

          HAHAHAHAHAHA

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            How is male buttocks enjoyment related to popular franchises ?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >going to church
            lmao
            LMAO
            Do you really think anyone still does this these days? Fricking christcuck, your israeliteworship is dying out and not soon enough.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              calm down larpagan

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I can't believe /misc/ would betray israelites like this...

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    All actors/celebs are just mindless prostitutes that will do anything for money, only morons worship them

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Now post reality

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >when your only victory is from 6 months ago
        sad

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You could go out on the streets of America and hold up a flag of another nation, you'd still be in America, moron lol

      [...]
      Holy shit rusbros we won on the map its just like my paradox games

      Seething lol

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Holy shit rusbros we won on the map its just like my paradox games

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    With the numerical and technological superiority on the Ukrainian side, pic related is the opposite of the situation on the ground.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >russia is just EVIL for attacking Ukraine! All because the EU and USA look like superior places to be a vassal state to

    How is this any different from USA and europe funding the rebels in Syria because Assad was tight with Russia? It wasn’t for the good of the people. A bulk of the rebels were the same Islamic extremists we were meant to be so against. It was just a power play over regions

    Why are we pretending russia has done something new? Only real difference is that russia is weak as shit in comparison and directly annexing things to try and force a ceasefire, lest Ukraine risk “invading” Russian territory. So I’m guessing Putin is risking that the west will stop supplying arms at that point to minimise nuclear risk

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Because russians are subhuman asiatic mongrel vermin and eternal pestilence on humanity and any opportunity for their eradication should be celebrated.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    To be frank I think that there are scant few redeeming qualities to either side in this war and only support Ukraine because I chat to a guy who lives there and it'd be a shame if he died for this dumbfrick moron war.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >We didn't need Kiev
    >We didn't need Odessa
    >We didn't need Sumy
    >We didn't need Mykolaiv
    >We didn't need Kryvyi Rih
    >We didn't need Dnipropetrovsk
    >We didn't need Kharkiv
    >We didn't need Balakliia
    >We didn't need Izyum
    >We didn't need Lyman
    <<<YOU ARE HERE>>>
    >We didn't need Svatove
    >We didn't need Starobilsk
    >We didn't need Lyschansk
    >We didn't need Kherson
    >We didn't need Melitopol
    >We didn't need Mariupol
    >We didn't need Luhansk
    >We didn't need Donetsk
    >We didn't need Crimea
    >We didn't need Belgorod
    >We didn't need Kursk
    >We didn't need Tula
    >We didn't need Moscow

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Kryvyi Rih

      WTF, you guys really call it that? I thought it was a Russian meme.

      Jesus Christ Mykola,

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >He still believes taking over Ukraine was ever a goal
      Fricking moron lol

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah sure, the entire first phase of the war was just a feint.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        True, Volodya is playing 7d chess where the endgame is to bankrupt your nation, set it back 30 years in terms of geopolitical podition, and make your people internatoonal pariahs. Truly a master of his craft.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >>He still believes taking over Ukraine was ever a goal
        >Fricking moron lol

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They hated him because he spoke the truth

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        He literally annexed 4 regions a couple of days ago.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yeah Black person i just annexed your house
          no
          no it doesnt matter
          i own your house now
          i declared it

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I annexed Moscow yesterday.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            i'm gonna annex your shithole

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This
        Putin is just trying to assassinate Zelensky to prevent the prophecy coming true

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >We didn't need Moscow
      hey, it worked in 1812

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >annexing things to try and force a ceasefire, lest Ukraine risk “invading” Russian territory

    Uhm, I don't think it's working.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Attacking another's land is a declaration of war. Russia has full right to defend themselves.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        > another’s land
        hahaha,see, about that…

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Attacking another's land is a declaration of war. Russia has full right to defend themselves.

        Lyman just fell to the "invader" and the Russians haven't done shit.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Russia lost fricking territory to impoverished shithole, that's so fricking hillarious.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Annex territories that you don't even fully control
      >Say that you will protect them using all means available
      >Both NATO and Ukraine say that they don't give a frick
      >Lyman falls shortly after that

      Uh, vatniksisters?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Lyman falls shortly after that

        To be fair, Lyman held out longer than expected.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Say that you will protect them using all means available

        That wasn't a lie lol

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So Ukraine has twin babies that was made by force Jesus?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder all nu wars is homosexual shit

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    WTF I love Russia, saviors of the white race now!!!

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    actors should get treated worse than street hookers.

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Any actual Russians ITT?

    Question. What's the word on this at home? Russian army hasn't done jack shit in months.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >What's the word on this at home
      Do you not have access to the internet? Every Russian male that has the means is fricking off from Russia asap.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Even vatniks are starting to suspect something is wrong, with that entire mobilization business and all.

      t. Ivan

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They weren't a little suspicious after Putin claimed to denazify a country with a israeli head of state? Or after it turned out that most Ukranians really like having their own nation and don't really want Russia to "liberate" them?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You are underestimating how apathetic and apolitical your average Russian is. As long as shit doesn't affect them directly they don't give a frick and go along with everything propaganda says. Now shit finally got real.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Ukranians really like having their own nation and don't really want Russia to "liberate" them
          This is the definition of Nazism for most Russians.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Ukranians really like having their own nation
          hohols think living in a human trafficking hub ruled by literal israeli gangsters is "having their own nation" lmao

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            They think it's better than living in Russia

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >hohols prefer racial aliens who planned and executed the holodomor over their slavic brothers
              hohol intelligence

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                But those were Russians. Nobody is brother to Russian subhumans as we can see in thks war.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >But those were Russians
                hohol moment

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >we didn't do it
                >they deserved it
                >we'll do it again
                Never change vatBlack person.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                rent free. despite your mania, not everyone who dislikes you is a russian. keep worshiping the people who genocided your ancestors, like the dumb cattle you are

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Russians have been genociding my people for generations and some moron in the internet will not change that. I just hope that after we genocide Russia we'll get to internet warriors like you.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >i-it was da russians!! save me nato/israel! i will do anything you ask!
                your daughter will be a sex slave in israel. you disgust me and every other european

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I will skin you and your whole family alive and force you to watch.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yes we're all familiar with hohol bloodthirstiness and sadism. go torture some more russian children for your israelite masters

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >every other european
                The other way around, the vast majority of Europeans are impressed with Ukies and physically revulsed with Russian scum. Not that you would know, Nigel from Yorkshire Oblast.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                the vast majority of europeans hates america/nato and wants nothing to do with the war, and that majority is only going to increase as winter rolls on

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Ah yes I forgot, we're supposed to freeze to death even though everyone including Germany has found other suppliers and has almost full gas reserves for the winter. Really shows you're not just regurgitating Kremlin talking points.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >ncluding Germany has found other suppliers and has almost full gas reserves for the winter
                Yeah sure.
                Meanwhile there are no streetlights from the Frankfurt airport to the hotel.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >there are no streetlights from the Frankfurt airport to the hotel
                WTF I HATE HATO NOW

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >the vast majority of europeans hates america/nato
                lmao your little communist club is not "vast majority of europeans"

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              it is.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Why are you describing Russia?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            seriously this, we need to stop those heckin ukrainian nazis

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >resorting to shopped images as an argument
            That's just sad

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >comparing Russia to the Empire
    Come on now. If Russia was in charge, both Death Stars would have been blown up before the rebel forces even arrived, Darth Vader would have stood in front of Alderaan with Leia for weeks, eventually retreating because Alderaan's defences were just too strong. Their ships would run out of fuel during dogfights and the Emperor himself would only meet Luke at a comically large table.
    For all its worth, the Empire was actually rather competent. Russia is not

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why did he say it in polish?

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Self-promotion. Every single civilian/private fundraising is self-promotion. No one can raise enough to even buy a quarter of a drone.

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Hamill is engaging in virtue signaling cringe but he's right. Russia is pathetic

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Putin forgot that Russia loses every... single... solitary war where there isn't somebody to bail them out (Hitler/Allies in WWII; France/Britain/US in WWI; The Coalition in the Napoleonic Wars etc.)
      The last 1 on 1 wars they had - Afghanistan in the 80s and Poland in 1919-1921 - they lost.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        also the winter war with finland.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Russia won that. They just took high losses

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    too many low t twitter man say russia voldemort, that mean russia actually good guys, me very smart, me just asking questions, y'know?

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ah yes I seem to remember how the Rebels were supported by the superpowers of the world and the Empire was a collapsing regime with outdated, barely functional tech and corrupt, incapable army. Ok the last bit fits considering stormtroopers.

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the only thing gayer than all this political/fictional hero villain signaling is being some /misc/ homosexual who meta games that very same signaling in order to form their political opinions

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Ukraine bad because.....because redditors make references to Harry Potter or Star Wars

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Muh bad guys are the Empire
    Didn't they get rid of the Empire like 3 times in the film's, and the new established government eventually becomes a new Empire? What did he mean by this?

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Powerful!

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    In case you haven't paid any attention to him, he's a crazy ass lefty homosexual. That has gotten increasingly worse as everything raises to meet his previous levels.

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    is hilarious to me how poltard americans went to support the big american patriot trump to support russia and putin just to be contrarian to the end
    this people would support china if they made liberals mad
    so braindead

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's hilarious how you can't type a coherent sentence while seething so much.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why would a magapede support Russia? Trump was as anti-Russian as they come.

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That's not Ukrainian

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This war has exposed the moronation of most "alternative media" pundits.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I mean, Russia does pour a shitload of money into their military. On paper they should be a power to be reckoned. The problem Putin didn't foresee is that 90% of his military budget actually goes on mansions and yachts and Harvard education for officer's kids etc and the real, existing russian military is a ran by aged, bored morons and none of the armor is maintained properly.

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >alleged superpower that claims to have world's second best army
    >gets btfo'd by a bunch of hohol pig farmers who are led by a literal clown and armed with cold war-era scrap, captured russian equipment and some rocket artillery

    Why was everyone so afraid of Russia again?

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If this was accurate America / NATO would be the empire but it fits left wing paralogy that the combined economies and forces of the first world would be marginalised. Any other conceptualisation would fill people with anxiety

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Cool Television & Film thread.

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Unironically, what is Putin's endgame?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      At this point? Nothing, NATO will enact regime change and probably foment separatist movements to break up Russia

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        ukraine's recent gains rest on outnumbering an otherwise superior opponent somewhere between 3:1 and 5:1. it's no coincidence that zelensky publically contemplated that ukraine's basis is (a meagre) 5.5 million men after russia announced activation of 300k to 1m reservists

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ramping up production and committing enough troops, thereby forcing ukraine to surrender

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It doesn't look like that strategy is working out. Most people don't want to be drafted, so they try to leave the country. Production is probably shit too since a lot of countried are boycotting Russia. Plus, it doesn't look like Ukraine is giving up soon, considering how they are basically marching through Russian lines at this point

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Most people can't leave the country for one reason or another. The real problem here is that Russia can't equip and train people they are drafting right now, poor fricks have to buy their own shit. Yes you read that right, you get mobilized and you have to pay for it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >have to buy their own shit
            Come on now. That has to be fake. I fully believe it's possible that there might not be enough equipment but drafted people having to pay for the "privilege"? Not even Russia can be this shit

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              It's real, it got so bad russian anti-monopoly agency got involved, since shops selling that sort of gear raised prices to ridiculous levels. Apparently equipment that was in storage either rotted away or was sold to aforementioned shops.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Can't the Russian government just buy that gear from the shops directly?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I don't think that shops have that much equipment. You need a frickton of gear to equip that many people, the only option left here is start producing it somewhere, and that requires setting up new production lines which is kinda difficult.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes but instead of soldiers having to buy the stuff themselves the government could do it

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Most people don't want to be drafted, so they try to leave the country.
          >250k or even 500k men when your mobilization basis is around 20m
          you dont understand the dimensions of what russia is capable of. they can lose millions and keep on fighting and winning this war. ukraine cannot afford to lose millions.
          >Production is probably shit too since a lot of countried are boycotting Russia
          russia is a resource-rich country. it manufactured ~280k mortars and guns in 1942, when german troops stood at the gates of moscow and east of ukraine, at stalingrad. it also maintained a 3m army in the field. in 1942.
          >Plus, it doesn't look like Ukraine is giving up soon, considering how they are basically marching through Russian lines at this point
          ukraine won't give up unless russia goes all-in or the west refused to scale up to industrial production. given the above numbers, ukraine needs at least 4 figure numbers of mobile artillery pieces and ammunition. if the west commits to that, ukraine will stay in and russia will be forced to interrupt supplies by nuking western ukraine at which point it will be gg

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >it manufactured ~280k mortars and guns in 1942
            with a callibre of 80+mm, i should add

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >it also maintained a 3m army in the field. in 1942
            You ever heard of this thing called Lend-Lease?

            if there had been a prospect back then of ukraine not being a russian colony but switching to the west, ukraine would have never become a country of its own
            >he would try to annex or subjugate Baltic States
            yes, if you force russia to mobilize fully, the baltic states will be attacked and conquered and NATO won't be able to stop it because it won't find enough troops to face off 2 or million battle-experienced russians over that piece of land. nobody is willing to die for riga

            >2 million battle-experienced russians
            They're struggling to mobilise less than a quarter of that right now vatnik, and western armies actually are battle-experienced but unlike yours we have modern equipment that actually fricking works. I'm sure all the NATO tank crews would love to have a go at whatever 70s crap Putin's currently fielding.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Lend-Lease
              sure and it helped because there were few trucks in the country at the time. but there are enough civilian trucks all over russia to supply a 3m army in 2022.
              >They're struggling to mobilise less than a quarter of that right now vatnik
              and yet they will get there.
              >western armies actually are battle-experienced
              i LOL'd. you can't say that with a straight face. ukrainians are more experienced by now than overall western armies.
              > I'm sure all the NATO tank crews would love to have a go at whatever 70s crap Putin's currently fielding.
              most people dont want to go to war. that goes for russians, ukrainians and NATO soldiers. but you know that russia currently only commits material that isn't reserved for a conflict with a major power, do you?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                lol, i've been hearing the same shit from the very start of this war. The stupid shithole collapses and you will claim it was part of the plan.
                I guess the collapse of the Soviet Union was also planned? I mean, Russia was so strong back then.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                SU was absolutely weak economically back then because socialism is shit. and yet kennedy stood at the berlin wall and did nothing because he knew the capabilities of the soviets. now we have generations in the West who don't understand war at all, leading to all the BS talk in this thread here
                ukraine will lose, it doesnt have the manpower nor enough guns to win against a russia that's scaling up. and it will be our fault for egging them on.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Sure, sure, Ivan.

                10% of a 20m basis will still be 2m men in the field.

                [...]
                by switching to war economy. again, the soviets could supply 3m men in 1942. unless you're telling me that they had more trucks back then than russia has right now or can acquire right now on the global market.
                and all of that ignores the issue that if the war becomes industrial and the west starts supplying ukraine on an industrial scale, the russian PUBLIC will demand nuking western ukraine to cut off supply routes instead of facing mass casualties among their own rank.
                the situation of ukraine is fricking hopeless.
                and that was my biggest reservation against supporting ukraine all along. we're pushing them into a fight they cannot win and that's disgusting.

                No, the Russian public will demand regime change. You know, something that already happened multiple times in Russian history. They aren't robots, this is not your video game.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >No, the Russian public will demand regime change.
                you're betting the lives of ukrainians that this happens. you're betting their lives on russians relenting and accepting being partially surrounded by hostile NATO forces and possibly facing ethnic unrest in their own country as their grip is being perceived as slipping. that's not a bet i would take.
                i think russians will fight for their continued self-determination. so that nobody outside can tell them what to do or how to live.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Bieng under Russian boot is unironically worse than death so I fully understand Ukrainians.
                >Russians
                It's not Russians. It's literally just Russian regime. It's not like Russians are free to express their opinion.
                NATO is a voluntary organization. All the East European countries joined it because of their fear of Russia. All the organizations created by Russians are either failures like CIS or they were forced on its members by Russian military (Warsaw Pact).
                And yet you talk about Russians and their rights to self-determination, lol.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i understand and even sympathize with their desire for self-determination. i just think geography and the geography of power can't be fought. odds are overwhelming. given these circumstances, their best hope would have been a russian colony with a maximum of freedom via negotiation. but that is no longer in the cards because they've been listening to fake friends who were telling them that they can prevail with western help when they can't.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Russia collapses sooner than Ukraine. If Russians somehow take Ukraine you can expect massive insurgency and terrorist actions all over the country.
                This is 21st century, you pretty much can't take over a country like that.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Russia collapses sooner than Ukraine.
                within 2 weeks perhaps? topkek
                >If Russians somehow take Ukraine you can expect massive insurgency and terrorist actions all over the country.
                what are they gonna do? take 600 children hostage and blow them up. been there, done that. it'd only lead to ethnic cleansing with ukrainians being pushed over the border to poland

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >blow them up
                lol blow them up because of your pathetic """""""rescue"""""" operation

                Maybe at some point the military decides to coup your moronic dictator. We can only hope.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                the point being that the russian public swallowed all this and won the war in chechnya

                >Ukraine must not join NATO
                >so we have to invade Ukraine so it does join NATO because we provided a reason for it to do so
                russians are moronic, huh.

                if the west is not willing to fight for ukraine now, it won't put up much of a fight when it NATO either. promises are good and fine but when your husband's or your brother's life is at stake, there's gonna be some soul-searching about that promise and how important it really is to keep.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Ukraine has 44 million people, Chechnya 1 million. They also weren't supplied by all the Western powers. And modern Russia has lower GDP per capita than even Romania.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I love how you ignore that NATO has sent billions of dollars' worth of war material to Ukraine

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                And tens of thousands of mercenaries

                Yeah, and in 1917 it was also controlled demolition and planned.

                That was pure chaos. Even people very familiar with it need help remembering all the factions and major events

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Ukraine collapsed months ago. It's 100% funded by the American government down to paying garbage men.
                However this conflict shakes out, the damage to Ukraine is already done. A fraction of people will return. It's going to be a shadow of a country. A formality on a map

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >And yet you talk about Russians and their rights to self-determination, lol.
                yes. because irrespective of government or even form of government, a country cannot let rival countries surround them like that. you risk ending up in a siege. so, even a soviet, a fascist or a theocratic government would have had to prevent that from happening. and that's why hopoing for regime change is hopeless. russians are fighting for other countries not gaining power over them
                no foreigner can tell americans what to do. otoh, americans can germans what to do if they want to. so far nobody could tell russians what to do. that is at stake for russians.
                they will not relent. and that's why what washington has caused here is a crime.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It already happened in the 90s. It will happen again but on a much larger scale.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                nope. losing eastern europe wasnt critical or else the russians wouldn't have allowed it. this is critical for maintainign self-determination. nobody can tell russians what to do, so far. russians are fighting so that it stays that way.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, yeah, it was okay for the Baltics to become UE and NATO countries. We never cared about those countries!
                We can always return to early 17th century when nor Ukraine or Belarus were part of Russian sphere of influence. History still continues. Russia wasn't always this powerful empire.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                the point being that with the baltics the west can't pressure russia, as demonstrated now
                with the baltics AND ukraine, the next stop is georgia and belarus and then russia starts to fall under washington's thumb

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i should add that for the US the kremlin is just a milestone with the actual target being china. with a russian zelensky in the kremlin, we'd see american outposts starting to pop up at china's northern border.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That was a controlled demolition and worked out between the USSR and American israelites. It was methodical and planned

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, and in 1917 it was also controlled demolition and planned.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >It's not Russians. It's literally just Russian regime.
                Nah, it's Russians. Every last one of them, in fact.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >No, the Russian public will demand regime change
                Even if that weren't a fantasy currently, who would replace him? Putin is more of a dive than he is a hawk in terms of Russian politics.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Change SMO to Total War
      Destroy ukie gas/electrcity/water infraestructures before winter and let west ukraine collapse.
      If that doesn't work and the comedian really want to take Crimea from the RF, he will nuke west ukraine.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        you only need to destroy railways and keep them down, whether by nuclear or conventional means. or, you just put another 10k arty pieces to the frontline, some of them will hit something while they turn all of ukraine in a moon landscape.
        the war is on the verge of turning industrial. if the west is not prepared to go that route, ukraine auto-loses. if it is, western ukraine will probably get nuked.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Ukraine will not lose this war and you're completely delusional if you think otherwise. The Russians lost in Afghanistan, they won't be able to take Ukraine.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            vietnam and afghanistan were not important to the invading countries. nor was iraq. they could easily afford to collect their toys and go home. ukraine has become an existential issue for russia as moscovites have to fear their entire federation falling apart if their grip on power is perceived as slipping. going home would mean partially being surrounded by a spiteful NATO and having hateful ukrainians at their doorstep. middle-class russians understandably don't want to face this situation but it'll dawn on them.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Fricking western leaders are really playing with fire. They really believe that Pootin is going to surrender to israelitelensky.

            When West Ukraine gets nuked, all this "I STAND WITH UKRAINE" meme trending topic is going to dissapear, beacause nobody is going to risk to get their countries nuked, not for fricking Ukraine, a big corrupted shithole beyond salvation.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              TWO MORE WEEKS

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              No, it would most likely lead to WW3, but I doubt even Russians are this stupid.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >No, it would most likely lead to WW3, but I doubt even Russians are this stupid.
                nobody is willing to die for ukraine. ww3 will only happen if there is an existential threat to a big nuclear power. nuking proxies is decidedly NOT an existential threat.

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    that ukraine's cause is absolutely hopeless

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Russia is evil.
    Nato is evil.

    If you disagree with the former you are heartless, if you disagree with the latter you are a naïve moron.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nato is based, Russia is cringe.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Naïve moron.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Useful idiot.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            That would be you, Nato supporter.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Nah. I know history well enough to not trust Russians.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I don't trust Russians either. Like I said, if you like Russia you are heartless.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                NATO saved Eastern Europe from Russian agression, so I'd rather support them than anyone else.
                If the Baltic states wouldn't join NATO when Russia was weak they would end up like Ukraine. And all Russia brings is corruption and misery.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >NATO saved Eastern Europe from Russian agression

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes. If Ukraine joined in the 90s Putin wouldn't invade it. It's really simple.
                And it's pretty obvious that he would try to annex or subjugate Baltic States if they weren't already in NATO and the EU.
                Happened with Georgia, with Ukraine,

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                if there had been a prospect back then of ukraine not being a russian colony but switching to the west, ukraine would have never become a country of its own
                >he would try to annex or subjugate Baltic States
                yes, if you force russia to mobilize fully, the baltic states will be attacked and conquered and NATO won't be able to stop it because it won't find enough troops to face off 2 or million battle-experienced russians over that piece of land. nobody is willing to die for riga

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No, it will lead to WW3. You're completely delusional if you think modern Russia is the same as WW2 Russia.
                >nobody is willing to die for riga
                That's a foolish assumption as it would dissolve NATO and no one in the West wants it to happen.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >No, it will lead to WW3.
                nobody in the west is willing to send their sons and brothers and husbands over there to die for ukraine. that's why there will be no ww3 over ukraine. ukraine will be beat into submission by an opponent that has a larger mobilization basis and defense industry that can scale up.
                > if you think modern Russia is the same as WW2 Russia.
                it's not because it's larger and more modern than WW2 russia. they only have to do a 10 or 20% production effort of WW2 to hopelessly outgun ukraine.
                >That's a foolish assumption as it would dissolve NATO and no one in the West wants it to happen.
                i can tell you the amount of dead soldiers that germany is willing to bear for that fake promise is quite limited. instead, there would be calls asking who admitted these countries into NATO and why. plus, article 5 does not specify any specific response required. a protest note or a token effort satisfy the treaty.
                washington has been foolish and if russia fully mobilizes the jig is up. people don't want to die for other people's empty promises

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                There will be WW3 if Russia attacks a NATO country. I never said anything about Ukraine. We were talking about Baltic States.

                >it's not because it's larger and more modern than WW2 russia.
                It's smaller. You know, Soviet Union dissolved already.

                >more nonsense
                You vastly overrate Russia. In WW2 Russians fought for their survival. Today no one attacked them. They are the aggressors. Do you think there won't be massive insurgency in every territory conquered by Russia?
                And NATO obviously has to stand together if Western world wants to survive. If it turns out those were just empty promises it would mean a total collapse of all American and Western alliances and would encourage China to take Taiwan, build bases near Australia and maybe even invade Japan.
                USA will never allow this to happen.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >maybe even invade Japan.

                Why though? The only reason I'd invade Japan is to get uncensored JAVs

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >JAVs
                Why would you want those?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                They turn my peepee into a big peepee

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Just fap to their cartoons like a normal person, sicko. JAV SUCKS

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Why though?
                So that chinks with their micropenises can have sex with gravure idols

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >There will be WW3 if Russia attacks a NATO country.
                nah, if nobody is willing to commit troops for ukraine, nobody will commit troops for the less important baltics. poland is a different matter. the only difference between the baltics and ukraine is a promise to give "some form of help" in case of being attacked. nobody will risk ww3 for that.
                NATO is bluffing when it comes to the baltics and it's very transparent. ww3 will only be joined in case of an existential threat. not fighting for the baltics is NOT an existential threat, claiming that is part of the bluff. NATO would instead have to do some soul-searching and explicitly determine what's worth going to ww3 for and what's not. i think NATO's actual borders are Poland's eastern borders.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >nobody is willing to die for riga
                True. However in a NATO-Russo war hardly any westerners would die, Russia is so overmatched that it would be closer to desert storm

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Oh my oh my I've found you Rigaaa, don't you run from me you lil Rigaaa

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                how long does it take for NATO to chew through 2 or 3 million men armed with 18k artillery pieces?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Lol, 90% of them will desert.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                10% of a 20m basis will still be 2m men in the field.

                How are going to supply that many people when you are struggling with supplying far fewer than that?

                by switching to war economy. again, the soviets could supply 3m men in 1942. unless you're telling me that they had more trucks back then than russia has right now or can acquire right now on the global market.
                and all of that ignores the issue that if the war becomes industrial and the west starts supplying ukraine on an industrial scale, the russian PUBLIC will demand nuking western ukraine to cut off supply routes instead of facing mass casualties among their own rank.
                the situation of ukraine is fricking hopeless.
                and that was my biggest reservation against supporting ukraine all along. we're pushing them into a fight they cannot win and that's disgusting.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Black person Russia doesn't have an industry that Soviet union had, it was stolen/destroyed back in the 90s, and it's not something you can create out of thin air.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                they have the raw materials and the manpower available to do it. ukraine does not. and that brings back my point: if russia goes industrial scale, so must the west or it's game over. if the west does, western ukraine will be turned into a nuclear wasteland through which no goods are coming forth and NATO will not start ww3 over that. people are sitting in their homes and don't want to die for ukraine.
                and that's why i think ukraine's situation is hopeless and the west is complicit in feeding those ukrainian men into the thresher.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >if russia goes industrial scale
                You really think NATO will allow Russia to exist with its current borders? There will be color revolutions up the ass

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >putin will be toppled any minute now
                morons overlook that it's not in russians interest to be surrounded by rival (NATO) troops under any form of government. their self-determination is at stake.
                and that is washington's crime: they've navigated everyday russians into a sutation where they have to choose between ukrainian sovereignty and russian self-determination.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                How are going to supply that many people when you are struggling with supplying far fewer than that?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                About three months

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Also, 18k artillery pieces? Europe alone has like 1k 4.5th gen fighters, men or artillery are irrelevant

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                "nato" i.e. america and international israelitery, are why the ussr was even able to survive the 1940s, you moron. who do you think kept the third reich from defeating russia?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                There wasn't any NATO in WW2. Also, I'm not a fan of the Third Reich.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                idiot. nato is just a rebranding of the american occupation and victory in europe. nato exists because the third reich was destroyed
                >Also, I'm not a fan of the Third Reich.
                no shit

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                NATO was created after the war in 1949. I don't care about alternative history or neo-nazi rambling. What you say is irrelevant to the discussion.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                dumb hohol, the ussr was only able to expand because the liberal powers you worship joined forces with the ussr to destroy germany. nato is a product and extension of the american victory in ww2. this is not alternative history, it's mainstream accepted fact

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >this is moron making fun of you for falling for Russian propaganda

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The allies built Russian factories, helped the USSR against anti communist rebels, fed the USSR grain during the entire food war at a discount, and gave Russia half of Europe

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >being unbiased is now a useful idiot
            Lol lmao

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              You aren't unbiased. You just don't know East European history.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Good goy. Here's more Western propa- I mean media for you to consoom

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Thanks, I like my media. What has Russia to offer again?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            murdering anyone who dares to lay siege on them

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You get to have a drunk ugly wife in the year you have before you are send to die in a hopeless war or get hit by a car.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              He asked about Russia, m8. Not the US

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                US is the same expect you have no wife or she divorces you.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >thinking NATO is cringe means you must support Russia
            The absolute state of millennials

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Nato is based
        Worst take in the entire thread and more pathetic than Russians defending Putin

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That he’s a gigantic leftist homosexual and virtue signals about a country he never gave a shit about before it became the new woke hotness

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >make a film thread
    >shot by the mods
    >someone makes a /misc/ bait thread
    >soon to reach bump limit

    the current state of Cinemaphile makes me so sad

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So who really is winning?
    Shills and people with biases need not apply(both russian and western)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      lockheed-martin, ukroboronprom, analog devices, texas instruments, almaz-antey

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Mark Boczek is a proud Polish nationalist

  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    He supports the CURRENT THING!

    Well imagine my shock.

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    since when did "Resist" become the thing to say instead of "Rebel"

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    u mad?

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I've already fricked bunch of petite Russian refugees, with a condom of course. They were cheap as hell

  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    To all the Russhills ITT:

    How does it feel to support literal losers getting absolutely BTFO? All because you think you're owning the libs by backing literal vatBlack person subhumans?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >200k russians vs 600k to 1m ukrainians
      >ukrainians have 10+ production years' worth of american javelin ATGMs
      > russia has a mobilization basis of ~20m, so fights currently with about 1% of it
      >OMG LOOK AT ALL THOSE RUSSIANS GETTING BTFO'd SO EASILY
      people talk of war yet have no understanding of it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >people talk of war yet have no understanding of it
        but enough about russia supporters

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          what's noble about handing a weakling some brass knuckles and urging him to fight a musculous bully? if the weakling gets beat into a bloody pulp, you share part of the responsibility for that. kennedy didn't fight for the freedom for east germans. nobody lifted a finger for the freedom of east europeans over decades. this feckless generation right now prioritizes human rights over peace and will in the end lose both.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            ok? what does this have to do with russians getting slaughtered?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              they're fighting with 200k men against 600k to 1m men but could and do ramp up against a country a third of their size.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                maybe they shouldn't have invaded?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                then ukraine would have joined NATO and EU and both organizations would have found it much easier to pressure Russia in the future. no Russian government can let that happen. is it moral? no. is it to be expected? yes. if people have to choose between other people's freedom and their own, they choose their own. and no it doesn't matter whether the West would actually do that. it's about potential.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Ukraine must not join NATO
                >so we have to invade Ukraine so it does join NATO because we provided a reason for it to do so
                russians are moronic, huh.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >we lost
        >that was the plan
        7D chess

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          no, it was inept. russia should have mobilized, or at least activated reserves, in early april latest. prep them like ukraine did and then launch a fall campaign, like ukraine did. instead they've been resorting to half-measures, probably for political reasons.

  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I hope Putman won't send all those rutracker seeders to the front.

  72. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Russia loses to Finland
    >Russia loses to Poland
    >China loses to Vietnam
    >Russia loses to Afghanistan
    >Serbia loses to Croatia and Kosovo
    >China loses to Pelosi
    >Russia loses to Ukraine
    So this is the power of the anti-Western coalition...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      B-B-B-B-BUT VIETNAM
      BUT AFGHANISTAN
      PLEASE DIVERT YOUR ATTENTION TO AMERICA

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      loses to Vietnam
      Didn't America also lose to Vietnam?

  73. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Christ, what a relentless NPC. Every neoliberal cause is taken up immediately and without hesitation.

  74. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The West's strategy
    >Step 1: make commercials with women and homosexuals to fool Putin into thinking you're weak
    >Step 2: Putin makes a move
    >Step 3: beat him and enact regime change in Russia

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Based. God bless America!

  75. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that there are hundreds of state funded Russian shills on Cinemaphile.
    "Putin is based savior of the white race" is one of their narratives.

  76. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that there are hundreds of state funded ukraine shills on Cinemaphile.
    "zelensky is based and ukraine is absolutely not a israeli puppet state" is one of their narratives.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      +15

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >+15 hohols dead for israeli power
        nice

  77. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    > it would most likely lead to WW3
    When will the nukes start flying, who is going to help Ukirane?
    Estonia?
    Finland?
    Latvia?
    Lithuania?
    Poland?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      USA has already said that if Russia uses even one nuke on Ukraine, they will demolish them with conventional weapons. Black Sea fleet is going to be destroyed, and so will the military bases on Crimea. Russia will have to respond, unless they cuck out as usual, and there's your WW3.

  78. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    when will you fragile white incels accept you have lost
    everyone hates you
    you have no future

  79. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >when will you fragile white incels accept you have lost
    >everyone hates you
    >you have no future

  80. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    consume product

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      vs

      be poor, die of aids or alcohol poisoning, gets raped

      I'd rather consume product.

  81. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How will Russia recover from this debacle? They lost all their prestige as a superpower, they strengthened NATO and will now get fricked over by the West

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >will now get fricked over by the West
      And China.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      simply by defeating ukraine. if russia does that, it will be the first big, historical loss for the USA on the global stage. that should be your cue that Russians won't topple Putin. the counterpart to
      >Russia will win in 2 weeks
      is
      >Russians will topple Putin in 2 weeks
      both are unrealistic

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >simply by defeating ukraine
        Not gonna happen. Russkies are losing bigly and they can't mobilize enough men.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Russkies are losing bigly
          Yeah sure. Waiting for ghost of Kiev 2.0

  82. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I support Ukraine but I hate celebrities using every political event as a way to stay relevant and circlejerk.

  83. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Almost every single post itt is completely and utterly offtopic.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *