He's also said we should stop funding Israel and opposes foreign intervention. But yes, let's continue to support putting children on hormone blockers and cutting off teenage girl's breasts because his boss is israeli.
I didn't say Matt's against zionism as defined as supporting Israel vs Palestine, just that he doesn't want us to give foreign aid to Israel or go to war for them.
But it's besides the point, you're the one who wants us to focus on the man instead of the message, bicker about Ben Shapiro and israelites instead of shouting this message from the rooftops in all out combat against an agenda that warps children, normalizes carving them up, takes grade schooler's to drag bars, etc. But go on, pretend you want to whine about the israelites while we see what's really happening.
You're not even a real antisemite. You're just exploiting Cinemaphile's israelite hate because you would rather we impotently hate israelites than push this very important question Matt is asking to battle the sick trans cancer destroying children in our culture.
>These people he’s interviewing are fricking insane. It’s almost like watching some mockumentary like Borat.
That's pretty tame though. Just go to kiwifarms, specifically the 'troony Sideshows on Social Media' thread in 'Community Watch'. Enjoy!
you're not wrong. he and the other grifters kind of irritate me. he was going off on a rant about neets, and riling up my mom. and i had to explain that he's just some homosexual podcaster, and im making money off crypto. so frick matt walsh.
This, but the average right winger on Cinemaphile is a 15 year old that wants to totally heckin own the ess jay double u’s at all costs, including his own people being wiped out
I'm a right-winger and the tears of TERFs are like music to my ears. Trannies are a direct result of third-wave feminism. These soulless harpies preyed on the goodwill of men and forced out sons to sit quietly and be docile. They convinced them that masculinity was evil, and that their maleness made them monsters and rapists. That they managed to drive some men so totally into self-hate that they abandoned the idea of being a man entirely and turned to trans-genderism is entirely on them. That they realize now the monster that they created as this new special class of victims supplants women and takes all their safe spaces is only a feminist's just desserts.
Every fricked-up degenerate transman that you see is someone that was destroyed by feminism. Every one of them was a normal boy at one point. Every one had the unlimited potential of his whole life to be and achieve anything. And they twisted them into the freaks they became.
Isn't Christianity literally a rejection of Judaism? And Judaism a rejection of Christianity, a rejection that Christ is the son of God? How the frick are they brothers?
israeli tricks and easily fooled christians
evangelical christians seems to be the dumbest of them
Jews believe that after all israelites are in israel again god will end the world
Evangelical christians believe that too, so they want to help
Basically because israelites fricked with language to the point where they conflated their own people with the tribe of Judah. The term israelite comes from the Roman term Judean which referred to all inhabitants of the region of Judea, compared to the line of Juah, the Judahites, to which Christ belonged. The "Jews" are actually Edomites.
A woman is an idea of a certain kind of presentation, and you could argue an adherence to certain norms. Even most trans people believe this because that's the point of transitioning, wearing female-gendered clothing, and altering your voice. its in an effort to pass. you could certainly argue passing is difficult, but thats the idea.
What is a woman you ask? someone who passes for what the current idea of that culture's "woman" is. most people would see taftaj and believe thats a woman they are looking at. That threshold for that idea can change and flex over time.
The argument or rather "just askin question" thing from the right here is all one big continuum fallacy thing meant to obfuscate. its the idea that ive won because ive obfuscated the line between your head and your neck, so hah! you cant tell me what a head or neck is because you cant show me exactly where one ends and the other begins! checkmate!
most people would see taftaj and call that person a woman. taftaj is not biologically a woman.
>What is a woman you ask? someone who passes for what the current idea of that culture's "woman" is.
Circular definition. Non-answer.
lol it was absolutely an answer you midwit. can you define "green"? you realize different cultures have literal different hex value thresholds for what they consider "green". there are concepts that are incredibly socially and culturally determined that also shift and transform over time
What you are talking about is not the word "woman", but the word "feminine".
Why do you guys insists on deliberately overlapping "woman" and "feminine"?
The reason is that you are doing it on purpose to confuse and manipulate the normalgays.
If you said that Chris-chan is a feminine or even effeminate man, nobody would disagree. But that's not what you are doing. You are pretending, and forcing other to pretend, that Chris-chan is a woman. This ideological "conflict" is all your doing.
Without knowing Buck Angel, what do you "pretend" that person is without anyone telling you anything about them? its all pretend, we are talking about aesthetics, appearance, norms. Not x-rays, perfect knowledge, and street chromosome checks
yea and most people would refrain from calling taf a women when they find out hes a biological male. It literally all goes back to what you have in your pants. Even your supposed identity, goes back to getting elective butcherings in your pants.
What you are talking about is not the word "woman", but the word "feminine".
Why do you guys insists on deliberately overlapping "woman" and "feminine"?
The reason is that you are doing it on purpose to confuse and manipulate the normalgays.
If you said that Chris-chan is a feminine or even effeminate man, nobody would disagree. But that's not what you are doing. You are pretending, and forcing other to pretend, that Chris-chan is a woman. This ideological "conflict" is all your doing.
What a woman is gets decided same way any other word gets its definition. "Woman" can be anything. What was the last time right wingers brought anything new into culture? Exactly why they're losing. They're impotent to create an angry.
>What a woman is gets decided same way any other word gets its definition.
Popular usage? Because popular usage is adult female. Yet that definition gets you in trouble with the people in charge. Its almost as if you are pretending to be a descriptivist while supporting prescriptivism.
This is exactly what Walsh mocks in the doc. Leftists shill all this dogma and go after anyone who doesn’t completely accept it, and yet when you actually confront them and ask them to explain and defend their beliefs you get this kind of non-answer mumbo jumbo. If you can’t answer the most basic questions then your ideology is garbage. >woman can be anything
So you admit you have no claim to truth and you won’t go after people who define “woman” in a different way than you?
>So you admit you have no claim to truth
Yes. I admit me and 99.99% of humans don't know truth is most cases. And if they claim they do, it's simplification of reality. I will tell you what a woman is. "Woman" is a meaningless category that was previously used primarily as a reductive label referring to birth giving humans. The issue with that definition is, there are biological males who are women. People like Hunter Schafer are, unless you learn about it from wikipedia or something, perceived as just women. It is so because "woman" is a rough, made up term to begin with that is associated with femininity, another vague category based on typical perceptions, and not exact truth of the world. So, woman, as we now know more, becomes a role people take and shape into whatever they want. Freedom. Just like in the past being a peasant meant you were bound to be poor and working on land until you died in 99.99% of cases, and then peasants were freed, the category of "woman" is experiencing a similar kind of transformation.
Ok, if you admit you have no claim to truth about the definition of “woman” then you can’t cry when people adopt a different definition than yours. No more whining about misgendering, sweaty.
>"Woman" is a meaningless category >birth giving humans.
So because you jerk off to Euphoria, that means womanhood is a meaningless term unrelated to biology?
>if you don't wanna frick the chick with a dick you're a simp
for how long we superstraight folk will have to endure such discrimination?
The ones whose definition of a woman boils down to "whoever I want to frick" are the most disturbing to me. Because men have fricked some weird shit over the years. Cars, goats, horses, traffic cones, two sponges in a pringles can.
sorry, but women dont have penises, they just dont
2 years ago
Anonymous
I agree. Some people seem to think they do, just because they want to frick dudes with breasts
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'd like to add to this, many men go along with gender ideology to not have to face their sexuality. They don't want to come to terms with being bi, so instead convince themselves a dude with implants is actually a woman. Many such cases
2 years ago
Anonymous
>it's actually TOXIC MASCULINITY!!!
and there it is
2 years ago
Anonymous
and most of those that transition are actually end level coomers that had their brains rottened by pornography
2 years ago
Anonymous
who is the homosexual transsexual bottom left?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>"higher than average IQ" >left side is full of morons
never understood that.
2 years ago
Anonymous
never thought I'd ever be jealous of a bunch of Black folk living in neolithic conditions in the middle of savannah
The term woman comes from an old Germanic word which means female, compared to wereman which meant male. 'Man' referred to the species and 'wo' or 'were' distinguished between the sexes. You're psychotic.
It IS related to biology in that most of what femininity and womanhood are have historically been shaped by birthing people.
>in that most of what femininity and womanhood are have historically been shaped by birthing people.
Womanhood is defined by "birthing people" because that's what womanhood is. Some narcissistic homosexual doesn't get to come along and just say the term is meaningless because he wants to feel special.
>People like Hunter Schafer are, unless you learn about it from wikipedia or something, perceived as just women
so true, and that is why rachel dolezal is a true and honest black woman. nothing matters except for your own subjective and flawed perception of reality and there is no such thing as the truth.
Thanks for reminder #95813940714 of how fricking dumb you dipshits are. Sexuality and sexual expression are extraordinarily deeply ingrained in every single human's psyche and the ways they manifest are extraordinarily complex. Race is literally determined by your ancestry and skin color. That's what made the Rachel Dolezal thing so weird and funny. It's completely separate and different from any issue of sexual expression, and it's why you've never heard of any kind of Rachel Dolezal-like situations before or since that one.
Seriously, the fact that you thought this was some kind of epic gotcha proves how fricking staggeringly moronic you morons are.
Umm sorry sweaty race is a social construct I’m afraid it’s off to the deradicalization camp with you
2 years ago
Anonymous
When you get btfo that thoroughly it's generally best to just stop posting so as to avoid even further embarrassment.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Not the same anon, but concession accepted anyhow
2 years ago
Anonymous
You said nothing of value.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>/misc/ having no argument yet continuing to post anyway
Name a more iconic duo.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Race as a category and oppressive structure is a social construct, but social constructs do no exist in a vacuum and can depend on biological factors. No modern scientist believes in races like "white, black, yellow", it's a bit more complex than that.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>social constructs do no exist in a vacuum and can depend on biological factors
Ok transphobe
>it's just super complicated okay you wouldn't get it!!
sex determination is actually very simple and no matter how hard you try to complicate the matter, the fact is that humans evolved to have two distinct biological sexes with two different developmental pathways for those sexes to develop and mature. just as getting a tan can't change the biological reality of your race, artificial hormone treatments, surgeries, and makeup cannot change the biological reality of your sex.
2 years ago
Anonymous
If you think sexuality and sexual expression are "very simple" you have yet again demonstrated what complete and utter fricking morons you dipshits are.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>you just wouldn't get it!!
are you going to start talking about how intersex disorders are actually completely new and unique sexes of their own now?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nah, naturally its very simple. Freaks like you just complicate it with their bullshit.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Based doctor, memeing c**toids to throw away their female easy mode.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nah, naturally it's extraordinarily complex. That's probably why we still don't fully understand it. You seem to have it figured out though: Why are some people (see: you) homosexual while most others are not?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Childhood molestation by homosexuals.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It's THAT complex, yet kids should get permanent surgery and hormone blockers as soon as they want to?
Perhaps they should wait a lot longer, as it's very 'complex' as you said, that can't be decided by a child's mind.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>It's THAT complex, yet kids should get permanent surgery and hormone blockers as soon as they want to?
No amount of deranged screeching from you schizos will make this the widely-held belief you seem to think it is.
2 years ago
Anonymous
So how many teens and kids is acceptable?
2 years ago
Anonymous
biological sex evolved to facilitate sexual reproduction, which is beneficial because it increases genetic diversity and the rate of evolution. there are two sexes in human biology and they are both necessary to produce offspring. that's why sexes exist. there are two gametes and two sexes capable of producing those gametes. no one can produce both, and no one can switch from producing one to producing the other. it's that simple.
the existence of genetic disorders that interfere with the function of biological sex does not mean that biological sex is fake or nebulous or "extraordinarily complex" or incomprehensible - you're just being disingenuous because it serves your ideological interests. no one had any trouble defining what a woman was until it became popular to pretend that you can't.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>why I still don't fully understand it
Fixed it for you. You are trying to expand category of natural, healthy behaviour to accomodate deviancy. It like trying to redefine sanity by including schizophrenia.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Actually it would be like including schizophrenia in the study of psychological conditions, you complete fricking moron. Are you actually trying to humiliate yourself?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Schizophrenia is rightly considered mental illness. When you go to psychiatrist they wont indulge in your delusions and tell you how valid you are. They start treating you. Because its deviation from normal human mental state and considered pathological. And yet you claim that sexual deviancies are part of normal human behaviour.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Homosexuality is rightly considered a sexuality. That is why it is included in the study of sexuality, an extraordinarily complex field which we don't fully understand. Which was the entire original fricking point. >If you think sexuality and sexual expression are "very simple" you have yet again demonstrated what complete and utter fricking morons you dipshits are.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>rightly considered a sexuality
Nope. Its considered sexuality due to activist work. But I understand. You freaks just feel bad about yourselves so you want to redefine whats normal to feel accepted. I almost pity you.
2 years ago
Anonymous
If a person is born into a sex they don't identify with, to help with the mental anguish and body dismorphia, you want to correct before puberty. This creates a better life for the individual.
The issue is complex, way more complex than the average republican can imagine. Its very easy to just simplify issues , because you don't understand the full picture.
2 years ago
Anonymous
most kids that show signs of trooning grow out of it after puberty, you groomers just want to start the transition before the point of no return
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nope, it is understood sufficiently. You are trying to normalize performing horrifing procedures by claiming mental illness isnt mental illness. Your motive is religious zealotry.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>If a person is born into a sex they don't identify with
This is an issue you invented. There's no identifying with your sex, you simply ARE your sex. If you're a man who likes to sew or a woman who likes playing basketball then that's all you fricking are. >to help with the mental anguish and body dismorphia, you want to correct before puberty. This creates a better life for the individual.
Luckily here on Cinemaphile we have a perfect example that you're absolutely wrong. I encourage you to watch I Am Jazz so you can see the end result of your madness.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Jazz's doctor is the same Dr Bowers in the documentary and HE fricked up her surgery
2 years ago
Anonymous
this one?
2 years ago
Anonymous
That's the one. Isn't it great that Jazz went on puberty blockers as a child so Dr. Bowels could experiment with all new surgical techniques?
2 years ago
Anonymous
dr. Bowels has done so much for the trans cause. Send her more children asapp!
2 years ago
Anonymous
my """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""vegana"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
2 years ago
Anonymous
>If a person is born into a sex they don't identify with, to help with the mental anguish and body dismorphia, you want to correct before puberty.
2 years ago
Anonymous
This discussion of the therapeutic uses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs begins with a review of development and biochemistry. It reviews the literature, covering true gonadotropin-stimulated precocious puberty, female and male contraception, endometriosis, uterine leiomyomata, hirsutism, premenstrual syndrome and other menstrual cycle related disorders, metastatic prostate cancer, induction of ovulation, and GnRH antagonists. 2 research teams announced the structure and chemical synthesis of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in 1971. Since that time, numerous long-acting agonistic and antagonistic analogics have been synthesized. The majority of analogs in clinical development have resulted from d-amino acid substitutions at position 6. More hydrophobic substitutions generally have led to increased potency. Efforts are in progress to provide the most effective and practical route of administration for GnRH analogs. After initial studies using an intravenous bolus or infusion, most clinical trials have been performed with intermittent subcutaneous injections of the drug. If GnRH is given continuously, it will desensitize pituitary GnRH receptors and inhibit secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). Many potent and long-acting agonistic analogs have been synthesized which are capable of inhibiting pituitary gonadotropin secretion. These analogs are being evaluated for conditions in which gonadal suppression is the goal. When used on a continuous basis, several of the agonistic analogs can inhibit ovulation and gonadal steroid production in the female. This means that conditions such as isosexual precocity, endometriosis, uterine leiomyomata, and hirsutism may be treated successfully. The side effects are few, toxicity appears to be low, and menstrual function returns soon after the analog is discontinued.
>deeply ingrained in every single human's body
Fixed it for you. Sex is purely physical matter that can be traced to things like chromosomes and reproductive organs. Its no different from race for the sake of this discussion.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Why are some people (see: you) homosexual while most others are not?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Sexual abuse in early childhood. While certain animals do commit homosexual acts exclusive homosexuality is unheard of. Its most like a result of early trauma. But if you want categorize pathological behaviour as natural expression, be my guest.
2 years ago
Anonymous
and yet people claim homosexuality is set in stone because that makes the grooming easier
2 years ago
Anonymous
a) You have no idea what you're talking about, just guessing.
b) Not every homosexual experienced sexual abuse in early childhood, and not everyone who suffered sexual abuse in early childhood goes on to be homosexual. Your baseless assertion fails by simple logic.
c) You're full of shit.
2 years ago
Anonymous
gays report to have been sexuality initiated at childhood much more often than straight people. You gays just want to sustain the lie that sexuality is set in stone to make it easier to get close to children.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>b) Not every homosexual experienced sexual abuse in early childhood, and not everyone who suffered sexual abuse in early childhood goes on to be homosexual. Your baseless assertion fails by simple logic. >c) You're full of shit.
2 years ago
Anonymous
2 years ago
Anonymous
You have no argument. Again, when you get btfo this thoroughly it's generally best to just stop posting so as to avoid further embarrassment.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I know you are probably used to mods censoring speech you dont like but here you have no other choice except to hear it. So stop claiming victory when you havent even said anything. It embarrassing.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You quite literally have no argument though.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You are guessing wrong. Abnormal behaviour naturally proceeds from some trauma or other damage. Exclusive homosexuals are something that doesnt occur under natural conditions.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Not guessing about anything, you're just objectively wrong, as I very clearly and concisely demonstrated. You have not "figured out" the precise ontology of homosexuality, and you're embarrassing yourself continuing to act like you have.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>a) You have no idea what you're talking about, just guessing.
You cant even keep track of what you yourself wrote. Also your explanation was just some nonsense about being "deeply ingrained in every single human's psyche and the ways they manifest are extraordinarily complex". You said nothing at all but empty platitudes. Stop telling others they are wrong and try to actually prove they are wrong, you intellectual eunuch.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You said to me, "You are guessing wrong". I was telling you that your incredibly reductive and on-its-face incorrect explanation for homosexuality was you having no idea what you're talking about, (you are) just guessing". Learn to syntax before attempting to be smug in arguments, you complete fricking dipshit. >Stop telling others they are wrong and try to actually prove they are wrong
I already proved you were wrong, very clearly and concisely.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Apologies I misunderstood your statement then. Also, you didn't prove anything, you imbecile. Your platitudes were just obfuscation of the fact that your argument has no basis in reality.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>b) Not every homosexual experienced sexual abuse in early childhood, and not everyone who suffered sexual abuse in early childhood goes on to be homosexual. Your baseless assertion fails by simple logic.
Please, please learn to read before you embarrass yourself any further.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>deeply ingrained in every single human's psyche and the ways they manifest are extraordinarily complex
Only one who is embarrassing himself here is you.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Sexuality is a complex issue that we don't fully understand
A completely uncontroversial statement to 99.9% of people. Hey, remember that time you said you knew the ontology of homosexuality and I completely wrecked you in two simple sentences?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nope. Your "refutation" was so glaringly incorrect that I didnt bother acknowledging it. I didnt want to rob other anons of joy of finding the mistake themselves.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Oh wow, this is some next-level humiliation. I would feel bad but you have thoroughly earned it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
look at this complex individual
2 years ago
Anonymous
This is normal human sexual expression, bigot. Nothing abnormal here.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>he's digging himself even deeper
OHHHHHHHNONONONONONONONO
Hey, remember that time you completely misread a very simple sentence because you lack reading comprehension and tried to make some smug response that made no sense, only to find out you're a moron that can't read? Lmao
2 years ago
Anonymous
?¿
Btw, im a new anon that jumped in here
look at this complex individual
2 years ago
Anonymous
>he's digging himself even deeper
OHHHHHHHNONONONONONONONO
Hey, remember that time you completely misread a very simple sentence because you lack reading comprehension and tried to make some smug response that made no sense, only to find out you're a moron that can't read? Lmao
Oh, and if that picture doesn't prove how complex sexual expression is and how relatively little we understand about it, that someone would behave in such an unnatural way, I don't know what does.
Fricking moron.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>unnatural way
I didnt post that pic, but thank for finally acknowledging abnormal behaviour as abnormal. Seems like you learned at least something.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I've btfo at least a half-dozen anons in this thread, so at least there is some education going around, but I don't recall ever saying abnormal behavior isn't abnormal. Your deranged all-consuming schizoid obsession with trannies is abnormal, for instance.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You havent btfo anyone. All you have done is defend mutilation for the sake of your own incomplete knowledge.
2 years ago
Anonymous
What? I tought this was someone else being ironic
We must re-introduce nazi bookburnings asap
2 years ago
Anonymous
2 years ago
Anonymous
I never understood why most people resort to the bible to bash the gays when there are tons of empirical evidence that give you all intelectual support to do so
>it's why you've never heard of any kind of Rachel Dolezal-like situations before or since that one
The frick are you on about? Sean King popularized it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
wiggers have been a thing since ever, Rachel and Sean King are only the most extreme cases of it
2 years ago
Anonymous
>be a white guy from Kentucky >have a white mother and white father >raised in a white neighborhood >overtly white first name 'Sean' >still become the most influential black person in a black social movement
Is there anything whites can't accomplish?
2 years ago
Anonymous
he claims his biological father was a Black person. Yes, he has no shame in publicly declaring that his mother is a prostitute.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>my father is black, he just hasn't been there all my life since signing my birth certificate
out we tracked your father down and he's white. very white. >n-no I mean, the guy on my birth certificate is white, y-yeah, but my mom cheated on him with a very very very lightskinned black guy, s-see?
lol. lmao.
>It's completely separate and different from any issue of sexual expression, and it's why you've never heard of any kind of Rachel Dolezal-like situations before or since that one.
His premise is solid "How is the left supposed to defend women's rights when it can't define a woman?". But I don't agree with his conclusions. The TRA left believes biology should match behaviour, that's stupid and damaging to youth too naive to understand the complexities of it. But Walsh just believes the reverse, that behaviour should match biology. Both of those beliefs are harmful in their own way
>biology should match behaviour, that's stupid and damaging to youth too naive to understand the complexities of it
How did children grow and learn about themselves and life prior to the troon shitdicks got all uppity?
Well children growing up between the mid 80s to early 00s were told that your biology didn't determine your behaviour. You could be a man who liked ballet or a woman who liked carpentry.
That never happened in any of my schools or classes and i am 35. We were told to do whatever we are skilled in and be a productive member of society along with not being an absolute piece of shit to others.
I only made it 20 minutes in. It was obvious it was just going to be a rehash of the typical clown world shit I already know. The only part that got a pop out of me was the crotchety old star wars store owner.
It's basically /misc/ troony hate watered down and bottled for your facebook boomer relatives
>The only part that got a pop out of me was the crotchety old star wars store owner.
You should have stayed for the FtM who realized how demonic it all was too late to save herself.
Had never heard of this guy once before until today. Watched the doc on a free youtube link and it was fine. It was honestly pretty crazy that none of the leftists could literally answer the question. I mean that's crazy.
Imagine wasting precious time watching this dreck. Anyone who seriously asks the question is already psychologically compromised because the answer of nature is more than enough
Critical race theory, which is essentially a theory of looking at the law and how it's formed. It states that current Western society is organized around the priorities and for the benefit of straight, white men. It "helps" explain all the disparate outcomes that Black folk face. It has since been used as a shorthand for any such adjacent philosophies and actions that are also involved in "diversity, inclusion, and equity."
critical race theory
it's leftist dogma that american blacks are such failures because of racsim in america
Even tough nigerians and asians are doing pretty good
when the one guy brings up the nigerians succeses, the teachers interupts him and say " ok, next person"
From the cliips I've seen he's proven without a doubt that trans or gender ideology is a cult full of insane people, dangerous people if they're in a position of authority, dangerous to children, and in their core essence that truth itself is abhorrent to their beliefs. They should be shunned at every turn. Good thing they're passing more and more legislation.
Why do people who claim to hate trannies spend such a massive amount of their time seeking out troony media and obsessively posting on forums about trannies?
Thought it was funny how he had the same opinion as the african tribesmen while disregarded the actual sociologists. Really says a lot about his argument
As an individual probably Rowling. It takes a special kind of seething to go through the publishing process just to write a book about a group of people hunting down TERFs called the Knights of Rowling
Transitioning is overrepresented amongst autistic people, people in the foster system and in Canada, indigenous people. If it were anything else being done to them, it would be getting called out for the eugenics it is
>if this all became acceptable
So your determination of reality is based on social pressure
2 years ago
Anonymous
literally everything you believe right now is based on one social pressure or another, or at the very least, responding to an existing social pressure. you arent the lone wolf see-through-the-matrix cool guy you think you are
A fun game to play.
lmao al jolson didnt identify as or want to identify as black. that was done cause they thought it was funny
2 years ago
Anonymous
>lmao al jolson didnt identify as or want to identify as black. that was done cause they thought it was funny
How do you know that?
Perhaps deep down he wanted to be black all along and societal pressures against TransRacial people discriminated against him.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>literally everything you believe right now is based on one social pressure or another, or at the very least, responding to an existing social pressure
Speak for yourself.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Cool, except we also have nice observable, objective reality. Stop playing fricking games. Women are adult, female humans. A female is the member of the species that can, barring some sort of deformity or illness, produces offspring.
2 years ago
Anonymous
define green
2 years ago
Anonymous
Define woman
2 years ago
Anonymous
see
Sure
A woman is an idea of a certain kind of presentation, and you could argue an adherence to certain norms. Even most trans people believe this because that's the point of transitioning, wearing female-gendered clothing, and altering your voice. its in an effort to pass. you could certainly argue passing is difficult, but thats the idea.
What is a woman you ask? someone who passes for what the current idea of that culture's "woman" is. most people would see taftaj and believe thats a woman they are looking at. That threshold for that idea can change and flex over time.
The argument or rather "just askin question" thing from the right here is all one big continuum fallacy thing meant to obfuscate. its the idea that ive won because ive obfuscated the line between your head and your neck, so hah! you cant tell me what a head or neck is because you cant show me exactly where one ends and the other begins! checkmate!
its all very shallow lol
Green is the color between cyan and yellow on the visible spectrum
different cultures define green in different ways, what is green also shifts over time
2 years ago
Anonymous
Green is color that is evoked by light which has a dominant wavelength of roughly 495–570 nm.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>roughly
in one word, you have inadvertently proven my point
2 years ago
Anonymous
blueish green or yellowish green is still green
2 years ago
Anonymous
Color exists on a spectrum. Sex is binary.
2 years ago
Anonymous
If a woman is "whatever I think it is" that's just circular reasoning. You don't get to define woman with "woman."
2 years ago
Anonymous
Green is the color between cyan and yellow on the visible spectrum
damn you completely destroyed that fricking homosexual troony scum right there. good job, anon
I hate trannies so much it's unreal, just ACK yourselves
How come passing is a requirement for identifying as a race but not for identifying as a woman? Because I can assure you most troony freaks identifying as women do not pass as women
>people would see taftaj and call that person "she" instinctively. taftaj is not a biological female.
That has nothing to do with how taftaj identifies. So is it a matter of personal identification or is it a matter of how they appear? You're been pretty inconsistent here.
ITS LITERALLY BECAUSE SHE PASSES AND IS ATTRACTIVE. YOUD HAVE AN EASIER TIME ARGUING THAT ATTRACTIVE PEOPLE ARE MORE WORTHY OF RESPECT THAN UGLY PEOPLE
No im arguing that aesthetically taftaj is more inline with the zeitgeists current idea of a woman and passes. thats it. the looks, the mannerisms, the clothing, the way the makeup is done, it evokes what we understand to set off the "woman" flag in our brains.
And im telling you the moment people realize that taf is a man, that no longer applies. People have a set of instincts that are exploitable and duped. Nobody here is arguing that trannies cant pass or look womanly, theyre saying that there is a biological inescapable reality that will never make them a woman, at best appear womanly.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Following their logic to its conclusion, butch women aren't actually women >inb4 they throw everything they've said so far out the window and say they still are so long as they "identify" as one
Some species of bugs mask themselves from predators by imitating leaves or pieces of wood. The fact that recognition system can be fooled is proof that it recognizes a specific category of things.
>"fool" someone if they fall in love with you, and you haven't yet revealed troubling elements of your personality to them
Yes. That is a textbook definition of fooling someone
>would you say you "fool" someone if they fall in love with you, and you haven't yet revealed troubling elements of your personality to them?
Yes? I fool people all the time. Half of the stuff I say to people is just to make specific impression on them.
Everyone knows what a woman and a female is, when you ask the question, what is a woman? you can tell everyone has a definition but are scared shitless of offending someone with their answer
imagine wasting tons of money with surgery and HRT only to become a dickless manlet that will never satisfy a woman at bed or be respected by other men
It isn't. The troony disease has not spread to Japan, despite Japan's long-lasting affection for traps in media. Trannies are still made fun of over there.
It's not anime, we had anime for decades without it turning people into troons. That's a recent development. Autistic kids are just being told that they can transform themselves into anything they want, and as fans of anime they're surrounded by cute girls being cute and happy and clean.
>be sexless anime obsessed troglodyte >troon out and become a """""""""lesbian""""""""" in order to bully women into having sex >die a virgin anyway
Sad! Many such cases!
most anime(more especifically, the moe genre) is nothing but the glorification of an hyper idealized version of femininity, which makes weak-minded men to believe their lives would be better if they were cute girls which kickstarts their autogynephilia.
Man idk what fricking anime zoomers are watching. DBZ, Neon Genesiz, and Tenchi Muyi never made me want to BE a woman. They made me want to FRICK hot women!
Even new anime when I look at pictures, the “cute” girls just look like cute girls to me, they don’t make me want to BE a girl.
2 years ago
Anonymous
those zoomers look at trap anime and think
>if a boy can be this cute dressed as a girl then so can I!
>westoids can't watch a few episodes of an SoL anime or jerk off to a smut doujin without rushing into the nearest gender identity clinic and booking a consultation
How is this the anime industry's fault?
thank god we got rid of a rich racist old white man and now we have another rich racist old white man in his place, but this time with extra dementia and crapped pants
>be a guy >have an attraction to blondes >love blondes and only want to date blondes >meet girl, she has blonde hair >fall in love and feel she is the one >she tells you that she is a brunette and dyes her hair blonde
A reason average person would not care in this scenario. Its a non issue. Now replace brunette and blonde with female and trans female.
>be a guy >have an attraction to women >love women and only want to date women >meet person, who claims to be woman >you try to frick and its a troony >panic and commit murder >jury finds you innocent >marry an actual woman
the amounts of copium from trannies here is truly astonishing, welp you will all cease to exist, we just have to wait until then
get all the hate you can get and rightfully deserve, pedos
Sure you can. I support Trump, hate israelites, simple as. Supporting any politician in America means supporting someone who supports israelites. You don't have a choice in that.
I honestly feel bad for all the innocuous people Matt Walsh and Justin Folk harassed. When you have a camera on your and are asked stupid strawman questions and suddenly realize what kind of movie is being made in real time, of course you'll get nervous and not necessarily the best answers will come out of your mouth. That's the same reason I hate Religulous
Colors are based on visuals of the real world. Blue was to describe visual of ocean or sky. Yellow for the sun.
Just like how women can be describe to the real world. A person with a penis can still be a woman. A person with boobs and vegana can be a man.
>A person with a penis can still be a woman. A person with boobs and vegana can be a man.
Incorrect, a woman is an adult, female human. A man is an adult, male human. That's it.
I enjoyed it, highlighted pretty well the insanity surrounding all this shit.
Nothing wrong with being a trans in my book if you're not constantly making demands regarding your pronouns and artificially getting upset all the time, but adults grooming kids into it and/or playing along when their children say they are X or Y, is pretty fricking evil and crazy.
Shame it's a Daily Shit exclusive, probably won't reach the people it should.
I am a woman.
Matt Walsh is cringe grifter anti-white israelite who's entire existence revolves around keeping right wingers in the zionist/neocon plantation.
what's wrong with zionism?
Walsh routinely calls out anti-white hatred on his podcast, he just isn't a full skitzoid like your hero in Buffalo
>die for Israel goy
no
He's also said we should stop funding Israel and opposes foreign intervention. But yes, let's continue to support putting children on hormone blockers and cutting off teenage girl's breasts because his boss is israeli.
>he said he is against zionism while working for a media company that pushes zionism 24/7
moron
I didn't say Matt's against zionism as defined as supporting Israel vs Palestine, just that he doesn't want us to give foreign aid to Israel or go to war for them.
But it's besides the point, you're the one who wants us to focus on the man instead of the message, bicker about Ben Shapiro and israelites instead of shouting this message from the rooftops in all out combat against an agenda that warps children, normalizes carving them up, takes grade schooler's to drag bars, etc. But go on, pretend you want to whine about the israelites while we see what's really happening.
He works for israelited Daily Wire but he isn't israeli ethnically or religiously
You're not even a real antisemite. You're just exploiting Cinemaphile's israelite hate because you would rather we impotently hate israelites than push this very important question Matt is asking to battle the sick trans cancer destroying children in our culture.
I was laughing my ass off at parts of it. These people he’s interviewing are fricking insane. It’s almost like watching some mockumentary like Borat.
Shill.
>These people he’s interviewing are fricking insane. It’s almost like watching some mockumentary like Borat.
That's pretty tame though. Just go to kiwifarms, specifically the 'troony Sideshows on Social Media' thread in 'Community Watch'. Enjoy!
you're not wrong. he and the other grifters kind of irritate me. he was going off on a rant about neets, and riling up my mom. and i had to explain that he's just some homosexual podcaster, and im making money off crypto. so frick matt walsh.
meds and BBC
This, but the average right winger on Cinemaphile is a 15 year old that wants to totally heckin own the ess jay double u’s at all costs, including his own people being wiped out
Rightwingers are just giant simps. Look at how mad they are about trannies because they are damaging to foids and how they worship "womanhood".
>if you don't wanna frick the chick with a dick you're a simp
for how long we superstraight folk will have to endure such discrimination?
It's not even that. Look at how rightwingers are now suddenly suck up to leftist feminists because of TERFs. Rightwingers are absolute morons.
I'm a right-winger and the tears of TERFs are like music to my ears. Trannies are a direct result of third-wave feminism. These soulless harpies preyed on the goodwill of men and forced out sons to sit quietly and be docile. They convinced them that masculinity was evil, and that their maleness made them monsters and rapists. That they managed to drive some men so totally into self-hate that they abandoned the idea of being a man entirely and turned to trans-genderism is entirely on them. That they realize now the monster that they created as this new special class of victims supplants women and takes all their safe spaces is only a feminist's just desserts.
Every fricked-up degenerate transman that you see is someone that was destroyed by feminism. Every one of them was a normal boy at one point. Every one had the unlimited potential of his whole life to be and achieve anything. And they twisted them into the freaks they became.
Frick women and frick feminists.
No one's sucking up.
2 useful idiots are fighting each other.
take your meds troony
Isn't Christianity literally a rejection of Judaism? And Judaism a rejection of Christianity, a rejection that Christ is the son of God? How the frick are they brothers?
israeli tricks and easily fooled christians
evangelical christians seems to be the dumbest of them
Jews believe that after all israelites are in israel again god will end the world
Evangelical christians believe that too, so they want to help
Israel is the greatest concentration camp in the world
Basically because israelites fricked with language to the point where they conflated their own people with the tribe of Judah. The term israelite comes from the Roman term Judean which referred to all inhabitants of the region of Judea, compared to the line of Juah, the Judahites, to which Christ belonged. The "Jews" are actually Edomites.
The same could be said about any e-celebrity. Once they've built their audience, it's all about keeping it. It's like the inmates running the asylum.
Obvious troony tactic is obvious
I think rightoids literally can't shut the frick up about trannies
I noticed this for the past 2 years but I'm now at the point of not giving fricks. I think I'll join in on the fun half-ironically.
Troons when you stop playing pretend with them
Well done for proving the posters point. You right wingers really are fricking moronic.
why did you reply to my post?
(You)
Not reading all that
>femoid whining
Tldr
>ACK
I'm a Commie sweety. I just hate TransBlack folk
gender interchangeability is an indefensible position
but then again so is racial and sexual equality
You couldn't at least spell check, bro?
the troon's arm popping off makes me laugh every time
Way to show this is all about protecting children and totally isn't just your deranged schizo obsession with trannies, lmao
>ACK
Cute dream (troony thinks he passes and chud is getting hanged)
The meme doesnt bother me but what does is the non ugly troony because you know for a fact the troony that made that is ugly as hell.
The average /lgbt/ poster looks like this however
Supreme Gentle didnt die, he transitioned lol
what a 80's metal head wearing lipgloss. I see no Femining features
literally looks like elliot rodger LMAO
a dude with a woman's hairstyle?
BASED
You started it and brought it upon yourselves.
is that fricking Ricky Berwick on the right
Love how Cinemaphile is having a meltdown over getting btfo by a cute troony
It's legit funny to watch
this is the first meme I see with chudjak where he isn't the butt of the joke
Chuds will inherit the Earth.
wholesome
It gets better.
troonyism is a more serious disease thancovid
>"Am I out of touch?"
literally nothing challenging in this doc. meant to be viewed by people who already agree with it
What is a woman
Sure
A woman is an idea of a certain kind of presentation, and you could argue an adherence to certain norms. Even most trans people believe this because that's the point of transitioning, wearing female-gendered clothing, and altering your voice. its in an effort to pass. you could certainly argue passing is difficult, but thats the idea.
What is a woman you ask? someone who passes for what the current idea of that culture's "woman" is. most people would see taftaj and believe thats a woman they are looking at. That threshold for that idea can change and flex over time.
The argument or rather "just askin question" thing from the right here is all one big continuum fallacy thing meant to obfuscate. its the idea that ive won because ive obfuscated the line between your head and your neck, so hah! you cant tell me what a head or neck is because you cant show me exactly where one ends and the other begins! checkmate!
its all very shallow lol
>All this word vomit
It's an adult human female
most people would see taftaj and call that person a woman. taftaj is not biologically a woman.
lol it was absolutely an answer you midwit. can you define "green"? you realize different cultures have literal different hex value thresholds for what they consider "green". there are concepts that are incredibly socially and culturally determined that also shift and transform over time
Without knowing Buck Angel, what do you "pretend" that person is without anyone telling you anything about them? its all pretend, we are talking about aesthetics, appearance, norms. Not x-rays, perfect knowledge, and street chromosome checks
>a woman is what people say a woman is
Clearly not an answer, you insane troon.
define green
yea and most people would refrain from calling taf a women when they find out hes a biological male. It literally all goes back to what you have in your pants. Even your supposed identity, goes back to getting elective butcherings in your pants.
>What is a woman you ask? someone who passes for what the current idea of that culture's "woman" is.
Circular definition. Non-answer.
What you are talking about is not the word "woman", but the word "feminine".
Why do you guys insists on deliberately overlapping "woman" and "feminine"?
The reason is that you are doing it on purpose to confuse and manipulate the normalgays.
If you said that Chris-chan is a feminine or even effeminate man, nobody would disagree. But that's not what you are doing. You are pretending, and forcing other to pretend, that Chris-chan is a woman. This ideological "conflict" is all your doing.
QRD? all you frickers keep talking about this but noone actually explains it
Matt interviews progs and liberals on what a women is
it's Borat clownworld edition, the interviewer is serious while the world around him feels like a parody.
What a woman is gets decided same way any other word gets its definition. "Woman" can be anything. What was the last time right wingers brought anything new into culture? Exactly why they're losing. They're impotent to create an angry.
>What a woman is gets decided same way any other word gets its definition.
Popular usage? Because popular usage is adult female. Yet that definition gets you in trouble with the people in charge. Its almost as if you are pretending to be a descriptivist while supporting prescriptivism.
>babby tries into philosophy of language
Adorable.
Cope.
This is exactly what Walsh mocks in the doc. Leftists shill all this dogma and go after anyone who doesn’t completely accept it, and yet when you actually confront them and ask them to explain and defend their beliefs you get this kind of non-answer mumbo jumbo. If you can’t answer the most basic questions then your ideology is garbage.
>woman can be anything
So you admit you have no claim to truth and you won’t go after people who define “woman” in a different way than you?
>So you admit you have no claim to truth
Yes. I admit me and 99.99% of humans don't know truth is most cases. And if they claim they do, it's simplification of reality. I will tell you what a woman is. "Woman" is a meaningless category that was previously used primarily as a reductive label referring to birth giving humans. The issue with that definition is, there are biological males who are women. People like Hunter Schafer are, unless you learn about it from wikipedia or something, perceived as just women. It is so because "woman" is a rough, made up term to begin with that is associated with femininity, another vague category based on typical perceptions, and not exact truth of the world. So, woman, as we now know more, becomes a role people take and shape into whatever they want. Freedom. Just like in the past being a peasant meant you were bound to be poor and working on land until you died in 99.99% of cases, and then peasants were freed, the category of "woman" is experiencing a similar kind of transformation.
Ok, if you admit you have no claim to truth about the definition of “woman” then you can’t cry when people adopt a different definition than yours. No more whining about misgendering, sweaty.
And I'll call you homosexual. Hey, names aren't real things, so, must not matter to you.
I just started laughing instead of reading past the third line. Dont try so hard to fit in, you out yourself and lose (you)s
>"Woman" is a meaningless category
>birth giving humans.
So because you jerk off to Euphoria, that means womanhood is a meaningless term unrelated to biology?
It IS related to biology in that most of what femininity and womanhood are have historically been shaped by birthing people.
>birthing people
Women
>birthing people
The ones whose definition of a woman boils down to "whoever I want to frick" are the most disturbing to me. Because men have fricked some weird shit over the years. Cars, goats, horses, traffic cones, two sponges in a pringles can.
sorry, but women dont have penises, they just dont
I agree. Some people seem to think they do, just because they want to frick dudes with breasts
I'd like to add to this, many men go along with gender ideology to not have to face their sexuality. They don't want to come to terms with being bi, so instead convince themselves a dude with implants is actually a woman. Many such cases
>it's actually TOXIC MASCULINITY!!!
and there it is
and most of those that transition are actually end level coomers that had their brains rottened by pornography
who is the homosexual transsexual bottom left?
>"higher than average IQ"
>left side is full of morons
never understood that.
never thought I'd ever be jealous of a bunch of Black folk living in neolithic conditions in the middle of savannah
The term woman comes from an old Germanic word which means female, compared to wereman which meant male. 'Man' referred to the species and 'wo' or 'were' distinguished between the sexes. You're psychotic.
>in that most of what femininity and womanhood are have historically been shaped by birthing people.
Womanhood is defined by "birthing people" because that's what womanhood is. Some narcissistic homosexual doesn't get to come along and just say the term is meaningless because he wants to feel special.
>birth giving humans
You are either baiting or we truly deserves extinction because I refuse to think that people as stupid as you exist
>People like Hunter Schafer are, unless you learn about it from wikipedia or something, perceived as just women
so true, and that is why rachel dolezal is a true and honest black woman. nothing matters except for your own subjective and flawed perception of reality and there is no such thing as the truth.
Thanks for reminder #95813940714 of how fricking dumb you dipshits are. Sexuality and sexual expression are extraordinarily deeply ingrained in every single human's psyche and the ways they manifest are extraordinarily complex. Race is literally determined by your ancestry and skin color. That's what made the Rachel Dolezal thing so weird and funny. It's completely separate and different from any issue of sexual expression, and it's why you've never heard of any kind of Rachel Dolezal-like situations before or since that one.
Seriously, the fact that you thought this was some kind of epic gotcha proves how fricking staggeringly moronic you morons are.
Umm sorry sweaty race is a social construct I’m afraid it’s off to the deradicalization camp with you
When you get btfo that thoroughly it's generally best to just stop posting so as to avoid even further embarrassment.
Not the same anon, but concession accepted anyhow
You said nothing of value.
>/misc/ having no argument yet continuing to post anyway
Name a more iconic duo.
Race as a category and oppressive structure is a social construct, but social constructs do no exist in a vacuum and can depend on biological factors. No modern scientist believes in races like "white, black, yellow", it's a bit more complex than that.
>social constructs do no exist in a vacuum and can depend on biological factors
Ok transphobe
>Putting makeup over yourself to appear black is sexual expression
Kinda fricked up there chief. You did a moron trying to sound smart.
>it's just super complicated okay you wouldn't get it!!
sex determination is actually very simple and no matter how hard you try to complicate the matter, the fact is that humans evolved to have two distinct biological sexes with two different developmental pathways for those sexes to develop and mature. just as getting a tan can't change the biological reality of your race, artificial hormone treatments, surgeries, and makeup cannot change the biological reality of your sex.
If you think sexuality and sexual expression are "very simple" you have yet again demonstrated what complete and utter fricking morons you dipshits are.
>you just wouldn't get it!!
are you going to start talking about how intersex disorders are actually completely new and unique sexes of their own now?
Nah, naturally its very simple. Freaks like you just complicate it with their bullshit.
Based doctor, memeing c**toids to throw away their female easy mode.
Nah, naturally it's extraordinarily complex. That's probably why we still don't fully understand it. You seem to have it figured out though: Why are some people (see: you) homosexual while most others are not?
Childhood molestation by homosexuals.
It's THAT complex, yet kids should get permanent surgery and hormone blockers as soon as they want to?
Perhaps they should wait a lot longer, as it's very 'complex' as you said, that can't be decided by a child's mind.
>It's THAT complex, yet kids should get permanent surgery and hormone blockers as soon as they want to?
No amount of deranged screeching from you schizos will make this the widely-held belief you seem to think it is.
So how many teens and kids is acceptable?
biological sex evolved to facilitate sexual reproduction, which is beneficial because it increases genetic diversity and the rate of evolution. there are two sexes in human biology and they are both necessary to produce offspring. that's why sexes exist. there are two gametes and two sexes capable of producing those gametes. no one can produce both, and no one can switch from producing one to producing the other. it's that simple.
the existence of genetic disorders that interfere with the function of biological sex does not mean that biological sex is fake or nebulous or "extraordinarily complex" or incomprehensible - you're just being disingenuous because it serves your ideological interests. no one had any trouble defining what a woman was until it became popular to pretend that you can't.
>why I still don't fully understand it
Fixed it for you. You are trying to expand category of natural, healthy behaviour to accomodate deviancy. It like trying to redefine sanity by including schizophrenia.
Actually it would be like including schizophrenia in the study of psychological conditions, you complete fricking moron. Are you actually trying to humiliate yourself?
Schizophrenia is rightly considered mental illness. When you go to psychiatrist they wont indulge in your delusions and tell you how valid you are. They start treating you. Because its deviation from normal human mental state and considered pathological. And yet you claim that sexual deviancies are part of normal human behaviour.
Homosexuality is rightly considered a sexuality. That is why it is included in the study of sexuality, an extraordinarily complex field which we don't fully understand. Which was the entire original fricking point.
>If you think sexuality and sexual expression are "very simple" you have yet again demonstrated what complete and utter fricking morons you dipshits are.
>rightly considered a sexuality
Nope. Its considered sexuality due to activist work. But I understand. You freaks just feel bad about yourselves so you want to redefine whats normal to feel accepted. I almost pity you.
If a person is born into a sex they don't identify with, to help with the mental anguish and body dismorphia, you want to correct before puberty. This creates a better life for the individual.
The issue is complex, way more complex than the average republican can imagine. Its very easy to just simplify issues , because you don't understand the full picture.
most kids that show signs of trooning grow out of it after puberty, you groomers just want to start the transition before the point of no return
Nope, it is understood sufficiently. You are trying to normalize performing horrifing procedures by claiming mental illness isnt mental illness. Your motive is religious zealotry.
>If a person is born into a sex they don't identify with
This is an issue you invented. There's no identifying with your sex, you simply ARE your sex. If you're a man who likes to sew or a woman who likes playing basketball then that's all you fricking are.
>to help with the mental anguish and body dismorphia, you want to correct before puberty. This creates a better life for the individual.
Luckily here on Cinemaphile we have a perfect example that you're absolutely wrong. I encourage you to watch I Am Jazz so you can see the end result of your madness.
Jazz's doctor is the same Dr Bowers in the documentary and HE fricked up her surgery
this one?
That's the one. Isn't it great that Jazz went on puberty blockers as a child so Dr. Bowels could experiment with all new surgical techniques?
dr. Bowels has done so much for the trans cause. Send her more children asapp!
my """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""vegana"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
>If a person is born into a sex they don't identify with, to help with the mental anguish and body dismorphia, you want to correct before puberty.
This discussion of the therapeutic uses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs begins with a review of development and biochemistry. It reviews the literature, covering true gonadotropin-stimulated precocious puberty, female and male contraception, endometriosis, uterine leiomyomata, hirsutism, premenstrual syndrome and other menstrual cycle related disorders, metastatic prostate cancer, induction of ovulation, and GnRH antagonists. 2 research teams announced the structure and chemical synthesis of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in 1971. Since that time, numerous long-acting agonistic and antagonistic analogics have been synthesized. The majority of analogs in clinical development have resulted from d-amino acid substitutions at position 6. More hydrophobic substitutions generally have led to increased potency. Efforts are in progress to provide the most effective and practical route of administration for GnRH analogs. After initial studies using an intravenous bolus or infusion, most clinical trials have been performed with intermittent subcutaneous injections of the drug. If GnRH is given continuously, it will desensitize pituitary GnRH receptors and inhibit secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). Many potent and long-acting agonistic analogs have been synthesized which are capable of inhibiting pituitary gonadotropin secretion. These analogs are being evaluated for conditions in which gonadal suppression is the goal. When used on a continuous basis, several of the agonistic analogs can inhibit ovulation and gonadal steroid production in the female. This means that conditions such as isosexual precocity, endometriosis, uterine leiomyomata, and hirsutism may be treated successfully. The side effects are few, toxicity appears to be low, and menstrual function returns soon after the analog is discontinued.
>deeply ingrained in every single human's body
Fixed it for you. Sex is purely physical matter that can be traced to things like chromosomes and reproductive organs. Its no different from race for the sake of this discussion.
Why are some people (see: you) homosexual while most others are not?
Sexual abuse in early childhood. While certain animals do commit homosexual acts exclusive homosexuality is unheard of. Its most like a result of early trauma. But if you want categorize pathological behaviour as natural expression, be my guest.
and yet people claim homosexuality is set in stone because that makes the grooming easier
a) You have no idea what you're talking about, just guessing.
b) Not every homosexual experienced sexual abuse in early childhood, and not everyone who suffered sexual abuse in early childhood goes on to be homosexual. Your baseless assertion fails by simple logic.
c) You're full of shit.
gays report to have been sexuality initiated at childhood much more often than straight people. You gays just want to sustain the lie that sexuality is set in stone to make it easier to get close to children.
>b) Not every homosexual experienced sexual abuse in early childhood, and not everyone who suffered sexual abuse in early childhood goes on to be homosexual. Your baseless assertion fails by simple logic.
>c) You're full of shit.
You have no argument. Again, when you get btfo this thoroughly it's generally best to just stop posting so as to avoid further embarrassment.
I know you are probably used to mods censoring speech you dont like but here you have no other choice except to hear it. So stop claiming victory when you havent even said anything. It embarrassing.
You quite literally have no argument though.
You are guessing wrong. Abnormal behaviour naturally proceeds from some trauma or other damage. Exclusive homosexuals are something that doesnt occur under natural conditions.
Not guessing about anything, you're just objectively wrong, as I very clearly and concisely demonstrated. You have not "figured out" the precise ontology of homosexuality, and you're embarrassing yourself continuing to act like you have.
>a) You have no idea what you're talking about, just guessing.
You cant even keep track of what you yourself wrote. Also your explanation was just some nonsense about being "deeply ingrained in every single human's psyche and the ways they manifest are extraordinarily complex". You said nothing at all but empty platitudes. Stop telling others they are wrong and try to actually prove they are wrong, you intellectual eunuch.
You said to me, "You are guessing wrong". I was telling you that your incredibly reductive and on-its-face incorrect explanation for homosexuality was you having no idea what you're talking about, (you are) just guessing". Learn to syntax before attempting to be smug in arguments, you complete fricking dipshit.
>Stop telling others they are wrong and try to actually prove they are wrong
I already proved you were wrong, very clearly and concisely.
Apologies I misunderstood your statement then. Also, you didn't prove anything, you imbecile. Your platitudes were just obfuscation of the fact that your argument has no basis in reality.
>b) Not every homosexual experienced sexual abuse in early childhood, and not everyone who suffered sexual abuse in early childhood goes on to be homosexual. Your baseless assertion fails by simple logic.
Please, please learn to read before you embarrass yourself any further.
>deeply ingrained in every single human's psyche and the ways they manifest are extraordinarily complex
Only one who is embarrassing himself here is you.
>Sexuality is a complex issue that we don't fully understand
A completely uncontroversial statement to 99.9% of people. Hey, remember that time you said you knew the ontology of homosexuality and I completely wrecked you in two simple sentences?
Nope. Your "refutation" was so glaringly incorrect that I didnt bother acknowledging it. I didnt want to rob other anons of joy of finding the mistake themselves.
Oh wow, this is some next-level humiliation. I would feel bad but you have thoroughly earned it.
look at this complex individual
This is normal human sexual expression, bigot. Nothing abnormal here.
>he's digging himself even deeper
OHHHHHHHNONONONONONONONO
Hey, remember that time you completely misread a very simple sentence because you lack reading comprehension and tried to make some smug response that made no sense, only to find out you're a moron that can't read? Lmao
?¿
Btw, im a new anon that jumped in here
Oh, and if that picture doesn't prove how complex sexual expression is and how relatively little we understand about it, that someone would behave in such an unnatural way, I don't know what does.
Fricking moron.
>unnatural way
I didnt post that pic, but thank for finally acknowledging abnormal behaviour as abnormal. Seems like you learned at least something.
I've btfo at least a half-dozen anons in this thread, so at least there is some education going around, but I don't recall ever saying abnormal behavior isn't abnormal. Your deranged all-consuming schizoid obsession with trannies is abnormal, for instance.
You havent btfo anyone. All you have done is defend mutilation for the sake of your own incomplete knowledge.
What? I tought this was someone else being ironic
We must re-introduce nazi bookburnings asap
I never understood why most people resort to the bible to bash the gays when there are tons of empirical evidence that give you all intelectual support to do so
>it's why you've never heard of any kind of Rachel Dolezal-like situations before or since that one
The frick are you on about? Sean King popularized it.
wiggers have been a thing since ever, Rachel and Sean King are only the most extreme cases of it
>be a white guy from Kentucky
>have a white mother and white father
>raised in a white neighborhood
>overtly white first name 'Sean'
>still become the most influential black person in a black social movement
Is there anything whites can't accomplish?
he claims his biological father was a Black person. Yes, he has no shame in publicly declaring that his mother is a prostitute.
>my father is black, he just hasn't been there all my life since signing my birth certificate
out we tracked your father down and he's white. very white.
>n-no I mean, the guy on my birth certificate is white, y-yeah, but my mom cheated on him with a very very very lightskinned black guy, s-see?
lol. lmao.
taking his cuck fetish to the next level
>It's completely separate and different from any issue of sexual expression, and it's why you've never heard of any kind of Rachel Dolezal-like situations before or since that one.
based pajeet
That type of relativism is textbook mental illness.
His premise is solid "How is the left supposed to defend women's rights when it can't define a woman?". But I don't agree with his conclusions. The TRA left believes biology should match behaviour, that's stupid and damaging to youth too naive to understand the complexities of it. But Walsh just believes the reverse, that behaviour should match biology. Both of those beliefs are harmful in their own way
>biology should match behaviour, that's stupid and damaging to youth too naive to understand the complexities of it
How did children grow and learn about themselves and life prior to the troon shitdicks got all uppity?
Well children growing up between the mid 80s to early 00s were told that your biology didn't determine your behaviour. You could be a man who liked ballet or a woman who liked carpentry.
That never happened in any of my schools or classes and i am 35. We were told to do whatever we are skilled in and be a productive member of society along with not being an absolute piece of shit to others.
where do I watch this? I'm assuming its blacklisted from Amazon and Netflix
thx bro, u just saved me $12
I don't need to watch a documentary to know what a woman is.
The absolute state of education in America.
Just pay for the banner ad you freeloading parasite. This isn't your blog.
Why do troonys hate answering questions?
I hate females much more than trannies.
I only made it 20 minutes in. It was obvious it was just going to be a rehash of the typical clown world shit I already know. The only part that got a pop out of me was the crotchety old star wars store owner.
It's basically /misc/ troony hate watered down and bottled for your facebook boomer relatives
This thing was glorious. Such little effort from Matt and he absolutely fricked up this homies headspace and reality.
>The only part that got a pop out of me was the crotchety old star wars store owner.
You should have stayed for the FtM who realized how demonic it all was too late to save herself.
man is short for human. woman literally means human with a womb.
I dismiss soifaced weirdoes out of hand.
When I first saw this being posted I assumed it was going to be an unintentional comedy with the onions guy explaining how men could get pregnant
ACKsisters, we got too wienery…
Why are you simps so mad about trannies?
Everybody hates narcissists and trannies are exactly that.
Why do obnoxious right wingers like this guy ALWAYS look like sóy boys?
meds and BBC
Had never heard of this guy once before until today. Watched the doc on a free youtube link and it was fine. It was honestly pretty crazy that none of the leftists could literally answer the question. I mean that's crazy.
Matt Walsh is a theocratic fascist.
I truly wish the right was as monstrous as you homosexuals say it is. You'd fricking deserve it.
Looks like you got your wish, Black person.
>Theocratic fascist
Probably means civnat.
>Child rapist
>Probably means good with kids
Why the seethe then?
honestly since woketards have declared that fascist is anyone at the right of Marx we might as well roll with it
Imagine wasting precious time watching this dreck. Anyone who seriously asks the question is already psychologically compromised because the answer of nature is more than enough
you could say its...time to get to the bottom of the question
It's funny that the best way of fighting wokescolds is just showing normies what they say & do when not filtered by a friendly journo.
>the world isn't ready for our message
Ok I have seen the term a few times already, what the frick are CRTs? Do trannies now identify as old monitors?
Critical race theory, which is essentially a theory of looking at the law and how it's formed. It states that current Western society is organized around the priorities and for the benefit of straight, white men. It "helps" explain all the disparate outcomes that Black folk face. It has since been used as a shorthand for any such adjacent philosophies and actions that are also involved in "diversity, inclusion, and equity."
tl;dr it's commie bullshit
>states that current Western society is organized around the priorities and for the benefit of straight, white men.
Sounds like radfems
Yeah they all have the same root: commies.
critical race theory
it's leftist dogma that american blacks are such failures because of racsim in america
Even tough nigerians and asians are doing pretty good
when the one guy brings up the nigerians succeses, the teachers interupts him and say " ok, next person"
Anybody who uses Tik Tok is a tool. What a great way to filter people, thanks China?
From the cliips I've seen he's proven without a doubt that trans or gender ideology is a cult full of insane people, dangerous people if they're in a position of authority, dangerous to children, and in their core essence that truth itself is abhorrent to their beliefs. They should be shunned at every turn. Good thing they're passing more and more legislation.
Still waiting for the US version of this
>http://transcrimeuk.com
Just finished watching it and now I'm convinced that Alfred Kinsey and John Money were the devil incarnated
you should look up helmut kentler too
also, a funny coincidence, all these people are israelites
Nah, that would be guys like Lenin, Stalin and Mao.
Money was your average psychopathic doctor, in the same vein as Mengele. No big deal.
Wait until you find out about Magnus Hirschfield who the israeliteess and protestant cuckold Walsh conveniently forgot to mention.
the point is that the same argument can be used against troons
adult
human
female
then they shift the subject to intersexuality, despite the fact that intersexuals are a minuscule group of people born with birth defects
And despite the fact that intersex people don't want to be used as human shields by trannies.
>some taiwanese children are born without eyes
>this means we dont know how many eyes humans are
Trannies are a miniscule group of people but that doesn't stop you from revolving your entire life around them.
intersexuality is not something you can be groomed into like transgenderism
The production is 3/5 at best but I hate trannies so it's a 5/5
It was a bit annoying but overall a good overview for those not already in the know
Why do people who claim to hate trannies spend such a massive amount of their time seeking out troony media and obsessively posting on forums about trannies?
>please, stop paying attention, go back to sleep while we railroad society into accepting our perversions
>/pol/tard posts some completely random screenshot to justify some grand sweeping claim about the state of the world
Literally every single time.
so many isolated cases
you don't care about children. you don't care about women's sports. you are quite literally just obsessed with trannies and nothing else.
spoke like a true groomer
but you're the one with the creepy 24/7 obsession with trannies though.
>proves that trannies being sick perverted freaks isn't just an isolet case
>goes back to "WHY DO YOU CARE"
Sick freak stay away from children
>ha! Got you chud, we dont want to change the meaning of EVERY atom on earth, so we are basically doing nothing, why do you care
>everything is fine, this is normal
Im convinced this event was a right wing psy op. Leftoids cant be THIS evil can they?
hey at least they are open about it unlike the church
Thought it was funny how he had the same opinion as the african tribesmen while disregarded the actual sociologists. Really says a lot about his argument
I heckin love sociology
that US universities are forming professionals that are dumber that a bunch of third world Black folk?
link where? was halfway watching it last night and it got taken down
Who, do you think, the troonydom hates the most in the world?
As an individual, or as a group? As a group it would be detrans people, followed by TERFs (the actual ones, not the meme buzzword it's become)
As an individual.
As an individual probably Rowling. It takes a special kind of seething to go through the publishing process just to write a book about a group of people hunting down TERFs called the Knights of Rowling
Promotion of trooning out is a way of castrating the autists, it's not even subtle.
Transitioning is overrepresented amongst autistic people, people in the foster system and in Canada, indigenous people. If it were anything else being done to them, it would be getting called out for the eugenics it is
A women is someone who identifies as a female.
There, I answered the question in 5 seconds.
Why make a pointless 2 hour documentary for a literal non issue for your failing political movement
Female is biological, you can't identify with chromosomes you don't have
people would see taftaj and call that person "she" instinctively. taftaj is not a biological female. explain this
Is man in blackface an actual black man?
if they pass as black and strongly identify as black and this all became acceptable and wasnt just being done to 1-up the libs, i dont see why not
>if this all became acceptable
So your determination of reality is based on social pressure
literally everything you believe right now is based on one social pressure or another, or at the very least, responding to an existing social pressure. you arent the lone wolf see-through-the-matrix cool guy you think you are
lmao al jolson didnt identify as or want to identify as black. that was done cause they thought it was funny
>lmao al jolson didnt identify as or want to identify as black. that was done cause they thought it was funny
How do you know that?
Perhaps deep down he wanted to be black all along and societal pressures against TransRacial people discriminated against him.
>literally everything you believe right now is based on one social pressure or another, or at the very least, responding to an existing social pressure
Speak for yourself.
Cool, except we also have nice observable, objective reality. Stop playing fricking games. Women are adult, female humans. A female is the member of the species that can, barring some sort of deformity or illness, produces offspring.
define green
Define woman
see
different cultures define green in different ways, what is green also shifts over time
Green is color that is evoked by light which has a dominant wavelength of roughly 495–570 nm.
>roughly
in one word, you have inadvertently proven my point
blueish green or yellowish green is still green
Color exists on a spectrum. Sex is binary.
If a woman is "whatever I think it is" that's just circular reasoning. You don't get to define woman with "woman."
Green is the color between cyan and yellow on the visible spectrum
A fun game to play.
so rachel dolezal is black?
damn you completely destroyed that fricking homosexual troony scum right there. good job, anon
I hate trannies so much it's unreal, just ACK yourselves
How come passing is a requirement for identifying as a race but not for identifying as a woman? Because I can assure you most troony freaks identifying as women do not pass as women
>expecting any logic or consistency
>people would see taftaj and call that person "she" instinctively. taftaj is not a biological female.
That has nothing to do with how taftaj identifies. So is it a matter of personal identification or is it a matter of how they appear? You're been pretty inconsistent here.
people usually want to be seen how they identify, how are you possibly trying to disconnect these two things? lmao
ITS LITERALLY BECAUSE SHE PASSES AND IS ATTRACTIVE. YOUD HAVE AN EASIER TIME ARGUING THAT ATTRACTIVE PEOPLE ARE MORE WORTHY OF RESPECT THAN UGLY PEOPLE
No im arguing that aesthetically taftaj is more inline with the zeitgeists current idea of a woman and passes. thats it. the looks, the mannerisms, the clothing, the way the makeup is done, it evokes what we understand to set off the "woman" flag in our brains.
And im telling you the moment people realize that taf is a man, that no longer applies. People have a set of instincts that are exploitable and duped. Nobody here is arguing that trannies cant pass or look womanly, theyre saying that there is a biological inescapable reality that will never make them a woman, at best appear womanly.
Following their logic to its conclusion, butch women aren't actually women
>inb4 they throw everything they've said so far out the window and say they still are so long as they "identify" as one
Some species of bugs mask themselves from predators by imitating leaves or pieces of wood. The fact that recognition system can be fooled is proof that it recognizes a specific category of things.
would you say you "fool" someone if they fall in love with you, and you haven't yet revealed troubling elements of your personality to them?
you use the word "fool" to do tons of legwork for you
>would you say you "fool" someone if they fall in love with you, and you haven't yet revealed troubling elements of your personality to them?
Yes.
>"fool" someone if they fall in love with you, and you haven't yet revealed troubling elements of your personality to them
Yes. That is a textbook definition of fooling someone
Since fool is being used as "deceive" yes.
Yes obviously
>would you say you "fool" someone if they fall in love with you, and you haven't yet revealed troubling elements of your personality to them?
Yes? I fool people all the time. Half of the stuff I say to people is just to make specific impression on them.
What’s a female
Everyone knows what a woman and a female is, when you ask the question, what is a woman? you can tell everyone has a definition but are scared shitless of offending someone with their answer
and what is the "woman" thing they identify as?
It was good. It was fun. I loved the old doctor lady who knew what was up.
you need to further proof that anime should be banned than the existence of this person
pretty sure that shirt is from a western cartoon
that thing says it was an anime that shaped his personality
uhhhh sorry roastie but were not banning anime just cuz japan is "misogynist" and "makes you uncomfortable" OK sweetheart?
the anime industry is a troon factory
maybe instead you should focus on cleaning house of the groomers in the west first before judging japan so swiftly
The woman who was cucked to death.
imagine wasting tons of money with surgery and HRT only to become a dickless manlet that will never satisfy a woman at bed or be respected by other men
Don't forget nippleless
um sir that's drake bell
He just looks like an emo.
It isn't. The troony disease has not spread to Japan, despite Japan's long-lasting affection for traps in media. Trannies are still made fun of over there.
It's not anime, we had anime for decades without it turning people into troons. That's a recent development. Autistic kids are just being told that they can transform themselves into anything they want, and as fans of anime they're surrounded by cute girls being cute and happy and clean.
>be sexless anime obsessed troglodyte
>troon out and become a """""""""lesbian""""""""" in order to bully women into having sex
>die a virgin anyway
Sad! Many such cases!
so trannies are based
why are they like this?
most anime(more especifically, the moe genre) is nothing but the glorification of an hyper idealized version of femininity, which makes weak-minded men to believe their lives would be better if they were cute girls which kickstarts their autogynephilia.
Man idk what fricking anime zoomers are watching. DBZ, Neon Genesiz, and Tenchi Muyi never made me want to BE a woman. They made me want to FRICK hot women!
Even new anime when I look at pictures, the “cute” girls just look like cute girls to me, they don’t make me want to BE a girl.
those zoomers look at trap anime and think
>if a boy can be this cute dressed as a girl then so can I!
>westoids can't watch a few episodes of an SoL anime or jerk off to a smut doujin without rushing into the nearest gender identity clinic and booking a consultation
How is this the anime industry's fault?
Beastly thing
>producer by ben shapiro
naa, guy is a hack
It was cringe how he kept trying to shoehorn anti mask shit, I don't wear one but holy shit can these fox gays shut the frick up already
I'm gonna watch it tonight, so I'll say later on
Not gonna watch anything by that moron soi right-wing grifter, but Trump lost
thank god we got rid of a rich racist old white man and now we have another rich racist old white man in his place, but this time with extra dementia and crapped pants
Funny things is, for how obsessed chuds are with transexuality, they now really little about it. Mostly pol memes or religious fairy texts
ah yes like how xx gives you female phenotypes and xy gives you male phenotypes
>be a guy
>have an attraction to blondes
>love blondes and only want to date blondes
>meet girl, she has blonde hair
>fall in love and feel she is the one
>she tells you that she is a brunette and dyes her hair blonde
A reason average person would not care in this scenario. Its a non issue. Now replace brunette and blonde with female and trans female.
Except dyed hair isn't the same thing as having a wiener, broad shoulders, no hips and no ability to give you offspring
Hilarious bait
>be a guy
>have an attraction to women
>love women and only want to date women
>meet person, who claims to be woman
>you try to frick and its a troony
>panic and commit murder
>jury finds you innocent
>marry an actual woman
topkek
Why are israelites so obsessed with undermining and delegitimizing transgender women?
the amounts of copium from trannies here is truly astonishing, welp you will all cease to exist, we just have to wait until then
get all the hate you can get and rightfully deserve, pedos
when did the Cinemaphile boogeyman switch from israelites to trannies?
The former begets the latter.
this
When trannies became jannies, literally.
it didn't, trannies are just their modern golem
trannies are the new furries.
Around the time /misc/ became a Trump fanclub.
Can't be a israelite hater and support a israelite lover
Sure you can. I support Trump, hate israelites, simple as. Supporting any politician in America means supporting someone who supports israelites. You don't have a choice in that.
I honestly feel bad for all the innocuous people Matt Walsh and Justin Folk harassed. When you have a camera on your and are asked stupid strawman questions and suddenly realize what kind of movie is being made in real time, of course you'll get nervous and not necessarily the best answers will come out of your mouth. That's the same reason I hate Religulous
what's strawmann about it?
they litteraly couldn't answer
>called masks "muzzles" at one point
at least he wasn't pretending it was a serious documentary
So trannies got BTFOed by something that wasnt even serious?
Colors are based on visuals of the real world. Blue was to describe visual of ocean or sky. Yellow for the sun.
Just like how women can be describe to the real world. A person with a penis can still be a woman. A person with boobs and vegana can be a man.
>A person with a penis can still be a woman. A person with boobs and vegana can be a man.
Incorrect, a woman is an adult, female human. A man is an adult, male human. That's it.
Imagine defending trannies on Cinemaphile of all places. Pathetic.
Absolutely based
It will mark the end of troonydom
I enjoyed it, highlighted pretty well the insanity surrounding all this shit.
Nothing wrong with being a trans in my book if you're not constantly making demands regarding your pronouns and artificially getting upset all the time, but adults grooming kids into it and/or playing along when their children say they are X or Y, is pretty fricking evil and crazy.
Shame it's a Daily Shit exclusive, probably won't reach the people it should.
I didn't want to give any shekels to Ben Shapiro so I just torrented it
A man is best suited to make a documentary about women and female behaviour and culture. As only a man can be objective.