Nice try but the corporations and politicians are the ones responsible for the situation, not some random person using the cars and jets.
This is just like when they try to push the recycling bs on the public when they know it's completely useless.
These aren't just random people, they are incredibly wealthy and have plenty of impact over politics.
It's in their interests to enforce rationing on the rest of the population to help balance out their lavish lifestyles in regards to climate impact.
These people will be switching to grain derived biofuel for their private jets to be carbon neutral, whilst millions will die from 'un-avoidable' climate change caused famine elsewhere.
The purpose of all this rhetoric is only the betterment of those who control society in the face of necessary de-carbonisation, you don't have to think climate change is fake or a nothing burger to realise this.
First of all, your celebrity worship is cringe. Put your hard on aside and hold them accountable
Second of all these are the people that push recycling BS on the public
>prius
does he even own one of those now? I swear the Leondardo DiCaprio Prius meme comes from when he was literally 20 something and owned pic related
>unironically getting uppity and angry because someone is using factual data that happens to highlight celebrity/climatetard hypocrisy
Why are left-wingers so sensitive?
Gender roles are ultimately determined by society, not innate sexual characteristics.
In Iran men who have sex with men aren't men, they are forced by society to become women.
Transgenderism is not necessarily a good thing as such, but these arguments against it are specious.
Just as a 6'4 troony with linebacker shoulders opinion that she is a woman is largely irrelevant, so to is JK Rowling's opinion to much of society.
Didn't read.
Men don't have periods. That's an immutable fact.
Any response other than "Yes, correct" is nonsense and not worth reading, let aslone worth arguing over.
>Society ultimately decides what a man is.
Lol no. At best society "decides" what their dogmatic and conformist members CALL a man or not. Unfortunately facts aren't changed based on what "society" decides, collectively or otherwise. Regardless of what the mob decides or denies, reality will remain: up is not down, dogs are not cats, straw is not gold, the Earth is not flat, the Moon is not cheese, and men don't have periods.
>That's your opinion.
No, actually that's a fact of Biology. You know what a "fact" and an "opinion" is, right?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Is it a fact of biology that women can't vote or own property? Because until fairly recently that was part of what defined being a woman.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Because until fairly recently that was part of what defined being a woman.
No, that defined the legal status of women within society, not WHAT a woman was.
Are you being serious right now, bro? You seem to be very, very easily confused by shit that isn't ever and has never been a problem for normal people.
2 years ago
Anonymous
What defines a woman is socially determined, including by laws and there are countless historical examples of it ignoring sexual characteristics.
I'm not saying I necessarily support the modern liberal view of what a woman is, but ultimately if that becomes the common view enforced by law then there isn't much you can do about it.
Personally I think the whole thing is a stupid compromise and in the long run gender will functionally disappear altogether.
look up c3 vs c4 photosynthesis, turns out higher co2 means desert plants (water efficient ones) grow way better, while temperate plants don´t really care or only slightly better off. But for stopping desertification its a wonderful thing.
And yet even with all of those cars, planes, boats and helicopters it still doesn't amount to the same pollution that all of these same big gas and energy companies put out every year. The biggest hypocrisy is gas companies having scientific research of climate change in the 70's yet they gas light everyone else into thinking it's our fault and our job to clean up this planet when the majority of our pollution is caused by these same companies.
>Just the yachts pollute more than the poorest billion in the world
Musk takes 6 minute flights in his private jet all the fricking time. I'll take Arnie driving his zombie truck to the nearest charity drive over Elon Cuck any day of the week.
>yet they gas light everyone else into thinking it's our fault and our job to clean up this planet when the majority of our pollution is caused by these same companies
Black person, companies create pollution as a byproduct of creating the products and services YOU want and need. They don't do it for shits and giggles.
>bro, it's ok if we poison the planet because arnold and leonardo di caprio have expensive cars!
They aren’t telling average people to do that, they’re advocating people to wake up to the climate disaster and push for change and have society as a whole adapt to it and fight to mitigate the rising problems rather than turning a blind eye and going “oh yeah, then why does snow still exist, libtard? OWNED!”
That’s why you can’t actually debate the actual issue and instead just do ad hominem.
>L-LOOK HE HAS 12 CARS COLLECTING DUST IN HIS GARAGE, THATS ABOUT THE SAME AS A BP OIL SPILLAGE!!!
Conservatives are so fricking stupid.
>hmm you want megacorporations to stop polluting 999999999999999999999999 times more than a car collection ever could yet own cars, curious!
>Uhhh you see a company made of hundreds of people making products/services for hundreds of thousands of people makes more pollution than ONE celebrity so um actually they're NOT massively hypocritical so yeah
Typical high-Estrogen sausage-lipped climatetard soi-chuggers; either so stupid the point went straight over your head, or you intentionally "don't get" the point because the point is something you don't want to/can't argue about.
Lol chapotroony-tier logic. >why yes I am a heckin communist but I literally cannot stop consooming Slave Labor Product #4828592402 because... euuhhmmm... we live in a heckin society and there is no ethical consumption under capitalism so I can't limit myself from feeding the capitalist machine but trust me we are heckin strong and will bring about a revolution
No he doesn't, anon is just a fricking moron trying to make a bait thread. How about these huge energy conglomerates do something instead on a mass scale.
The inherent argument is that the average person who emits relatively little should make significant sacrifices to their quality of life whilst multi-millionaire celebrities that produce significantly more Co2 do nothing except lecture you. Perhaps they should lead by example. The planet is ending but it's not apparently ending enough to own one house or fly economy, they need that private jet; how else will Leo frick some JB
Typical climatetard stiff.
Don't own a car, use "public transportation". Don't eat eat meat, eat onions-paste and bugs. Don't live in suburban and rural areas, live in the more efficient cities in a human-hive. Pay higher taxes. Buy "carbon credits". Don't reproduce (if you're white).
They aren’t telling average people to do that, they’re advocating people to wake up to the climate disaster and push for change and have society as a whole adapt to it and fight to mitigate the rising problems rather than turning a blind eye and going “oh yeah, then why does snow still exist, libtard? OWNED!”
That’s why you can’t actually debate the actual issue and instead just do ad hominem.
>That’s why you can’t actually debate the actual issue and instead just do ad hominem.
I wish you could see the irony but you've made it absolutly clear that anything written above the leve of a grade schooler far eclipses your mental capabilities.
You're being disingenuous. What do you think "have society change and adapt" means if not a reduced quality of life. If you're being sincere you don't understand your own politics. The inherent argument is people consume too much so they should consume less, you can dress it up however you want but that's reality
>significant sacrifices to their quality of life
Such as?
Don't eat meat, don't drive anywhere or have a fast car, don't take a holiday, don't have kids, live in a tiny rental
So nobody said that and is some schizo scenario you made up?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Don't eat meat, don't drive anywhere or have a fast car, don't take a holiday, don't have kids, live in a tiny rental
who said that?
>Eat less meat: UN Climate-change report calls for change to human diet - Nature >Here's what your hamburger is to the climate - Forbes >Meat eating is a big climate issue - Theconversation >Want to fight climate change? Have fewer children - Guaridan >How our daily travel harms the planet - BBC
I could go on forever but we all know you're being disingenuous and are just wasting time
2 years ago
Anonymous
>eat less meat = don't eat meat
2 years ago
Anonymous
How much is "less"?
Oh wait, that's the point: it's intentionally nebulous so that sooner or later you can get it to "no meat".
The average diet has meat as a tiny minority any way. Stop pretending that Leftcucks don't have a religious-tier vendetta against meat-eating.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Take your meds, chud.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Eat shit out of my ass, gay.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You know it’s actually more healthy to not stuff your face with red meat every day, right? And raising beef is highly wasteful use of resources and consumes needlessly water, land and feed. Just by eating more chicken instead red meat reduces a lot of your average CO2 footprint.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Who gives a frick homosexual. Cattle live on land that’s only good for grazing.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Based and correct
2 years ago
Anonymous
And you just KNOW that these rich hypocritical homosexuals will be sipping wine and eating steak and laughing after meat is made too expensive to afford for the working class/outright illegal and we proles are instead eating crickets and plant-gruel.
Reduced quality of life is unavoidable, you stupid frick. It’s a question to what degree we can mitigate it because food shortages, extreme weather conditions, pandemics, etc. will keep becoming bigger and bigger problems as the temperatures rise. But as expected all you idiots can do is do “uh-nuh, I DON’T WANNA DO ANYTHING” like a child and cry that you can’t be hedonistic pampered babies.
I'm not going to willingly reduce my quality of life for the sake of a state and polity that exists to exploit me.
When I have political power it will be my responsibility to deal with climate change, until then you will have to force me.
2 years ago
Anonymous
As expected of a selfish child.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I'm going to pollute the planet because I'm a wageslave
Tax meat into being a luxury good.
Make energy prices 30% of my income.
Ban passenger air travel.
Make cars unaffordable.
Go for it, you have the power to do all of these things.
Just don't ever expect me to be happy about it.
We aren't all in this together.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Go for it, you have the power to do all of these things.
homie, who do you think you're talking to?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I'm going to pollute the planet because I'm a wageslave
>and push for change and have society as a whole adapt to it and fight to mitigate the rising problems
And the "changes" are always shit like
Typical climatetard stiff.
Don't own a car, use "public transportation". Don't eat eat meat, eat onions-paste and bugs. Don't live in suburban and rural areas, live in the more efficient cities in a human-hive. Pay higher taxes. Buy "carbon credits". Don't reproduce (if you're white).
Typical climatetard stiff.
Don't own a car, use "public transportation". Don't eat eat meat, eat onions-paste and bugs. Don't live in suburban and rural areas, live in the more efficient cities in a human-hive. Pay higher taxes. Buy "carbon credits". Don't reproduce (if you're white).
>they tell me to eat le bugs and not reproduce!!!
Imagine getting brainwashed by a board full of schizos and virgins.
Black person BOTH those things have been on the cover of TIME Magazine.
Typical lefttard gaslighting. "You're crazy, that's not happening and nobody ACTUALLY supports that" now, "Its happening and we supported it all along and now it's too late for you to stop us :^)" later.
If the solutions were easy you babies wouldn’t have spent several decades whining and stopping anything to be done about it. It really showcases the entitled narcissism when it’s all about how aggravated you are that a global crisis mildly inconveniences you now, not what long term dangers it poses to everyone.
>WAAAAAAH WAAAAAAH WAAAAAAH >trying to accuse ANYONE ELSE of being a "baby"
Holy shit, lol.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Ah yes, people trying to address these complex problems are the babies, not the people who just whine about not wanting to do anything and how any proposed change is automatically bad.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>trying to address these complex problems are the babies
You "address" them by demanding I reduce my quality of life and then pitch an absolute seething fit when I say "No thank you" or WORSE when I point out the problems in your proposed "solutions".
2 years ago
Anonymous
You keep refusing to acknowledge the root problem that forces us to make bigger and bigger changes and every step of the way you whine about not wanting to do anything because you don’t like it.
You are a parasite and a do nothing waste of space and resources.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Haha frick off homosexual. No one is willing to put up with your bullshit because you made up some climate bullshit.
It’s fricking non sense. Everyone knows it’s non sense. You just attribute occasional phenomenon with a trend. Like forest fires in California…. Which has always had forest fires.
It’s a grift just like the race shit.
2 years ago
Anonymous
California is now basically burning around the year instead of a specific season. Entire towns are burned down to the ground regularly. But who cares about that, right.
>dude you're "entitled" and "a baby" because you want to eat burgers, own a vehicle and live outside a city
Lol keep it up you petulant little homosexual. Your squealing is music to my ears.
You know there’s more to the environment than the CO2 in the air right. I have a ton for motorized vehicles, but I pollute way less than a onions homosexual with their latest ev and phone. Also the most obvious sign of pollution is littering and I don’t see anything done about that. This whole climate change bullshit is just a narrative to introduce new taxes and markets.
I don't know about you guys, but I think we should be giving up non-essential things, like nutritious food, heating and readily available transportation, for the sake of the climate.
We need to make it easier for the people who manage society (not us); we need to make it easier for them to balance the climate budget.
They shouldn't have to ask us or give us anything for it.
If we don't do it then we will be un-avoidably killed by climate change, something who's effects cannot, in any way, be mitigated by other means.
When people die during climate change caused droughts or flooding, that's because of climate change, not because they starved or were drowned, but because you are still eating beef.
did you know the tides only affect the depth of the ocean by a little over 0.1%?
but guess what, you dumb fat Black person. that's still enough to drive all the world's ocean currents
The reason I'm calling you schizos is because you're schizos are talking to me as if I'm some higher-up in le secret cabal that wants to cut off your burger consumption of something and not some ordinary guy on Cinemaphile on Saturday. Or am I? Fricking schizos.
>implying celebrities, especially leftist celebrities, will be beholden to the same laws the common man is
Fricking kek. The law has never been enforced equally on celebrities and never will be.
I currently live on a half acre plot of land in an old wooden house, heated by firewood, water drawn from a well. I grow about 20% of my calories on-site, and drive an EV for 95% of the miles I cover by car.
Soon I plan to move to a smaller house on a larger plot of land, switch to a bicycle for most of my transportation, and attempt to nudge the on-site calories as close to 100% as possible.
Thing is this shit doesn't scale to everybody. We simply have too many people for this kind of lifestyle, even if you ignore the other problems with attempting to scale it up and the fact that most people simply aren't willing to transition to a lower energy lifestyle even if it was offered to them.
When, if, the weather and climate shift so much that crops are failing, productivity plummets, and the modern standard of life and food availability plummets. IF that happens, it's never going to be some kumbaya shift to wearing straw hats and living like the amish. There's going to be a lot of blood.
I'm not a fricking saint. I do this because I don't plan on being anywhere near civilization in my later life if I can possibly avoid it. Because it's probably going to get messy.
Thing is, while I think this is gonna happen in future I can't say how soon that's going to be. It might end up being completely irrelevant in my lifetime. At which point I'm in some kind of eco-pascal's wager and have wasted a lot of life living less comfortably than I might if I'd made a different bet on the near future.
>Is that.....(GASP)...someone calling out a celebrity on their hypocrisy?!?! DON'T WORRY, LEO-SAMA!!! I'LL PROTECT YOU WITH MY VIRGINIIIIIIIIIIITY!!!!!!
Why are climatetards so fricking cringe, bros?
i don't drive, not because i care about the environment (i frequently throw recyclable shit in the trash), but simply because i have too much anxiety and autism
Didnt know Jim was actually this based. Damn. Still driving his c6 too when he could get any car he wants. Actually based.
He's only be based if he were open and proud of it and NOT shaming working-class people for eating meat.
Nice try but the corporations and politicians are the ones responsible for the situation, not some random person using the cars and jets.
This is just like when they try to push the recycling bs on the public when they know it's completely useless.
These aren't just random people, they are incredibly wealthy and have plenty of impact over politics.
It's in their interests to enforce rationing on the rest of the population to help balance out their lavish lifestyles in regards to climate impact.
These people will be switching to grain derived biofuel for their private jets to be carbon neutral, whilst millions will die from 'un-avoidable' climate change caused famine elsewhere.
The purpose of all this rhetoric is only the betterment of those who control society in the face of necessary de-carbonisation, you don't have to think climate change is fake or a nothing burger to realise this.
these "random" people pollute more than hundreds of people. Probably hollywood actors pollute more than entire Europe
Not random people at all.
corporations can't make polluting products without someone to buy the products
First of all, your celebrity worship is cringe. Put your hard on aside and hold them accountable
Second of all these are the people that push recycling BS on the public
How can one man be so based?
Imagine caring about any of these buttholes' worthless opinions.
i was expecting cameron to have a submarine
never seen or heard of him driving any of those
it's called collecting
He didn't drive so good.
he clearly was driving the red prius bro.......
I mean that just makes it worse. They are shaming working class rural people who NEED car to drive to work
Arnold is one of the reasons the Hummer even made it into civilian hands, pretty sure he got the first one.
>prius
does he even own one of those now? I swear the Leondardo DiCaprio Prius meme comes from when he was literally 20 something and owned pic related
>Famous for
>Not The Revenant for which he won an oscar
Why are right-wingers so sensitive?
>unironically getting uppity and angry because someone is using factual data that happens to highlight celebrity/climatetard hypocrisy
Why are left-wingers so sensitive?
t. Still having a meltdown over Rowling saying "Men don't have periods".
Gender roles are ultimately determined by society, not innate sexual characteristics.
In Iran men who have sex with men aren't men, they are forced by society to become women.
Transgenderism is not necessarily a good thing as such, but these arguments against it are specious.
Just as a 6'4 troony with linebacker shoulders opinion that she is a woman is largely irrelevant, so to is JK Rowling's opinion to much of society.
Didn't read.
Men don't have periods. That's an immutable fact.
Any response other than "Yes, correct" is nonsense and not worth reading, let aslone worth arguing over.
That's your opinion.
Society ultimately decides what a man is.
>Society ultimately decides what a man is.
Lol no. At best society "decides" what their dogmatic and conformist members CALL a man or not. Unfortunately facts aren't changed based on what "society" decides, collectively or otherwise. Regardless of what the mob decides or denies, reality will remain: up is not down, dogs are not cats, straw is not gold, the Earth is not flat, the Moon is not cheese, and men don't have periods.
>That's your opinion.
No, actually that's a fact of Biology. You know what a "fact" and an "opinion" is, right?
Is it a fact of biology that women can't vote or own property? Because until fairly recently that was part of what defined being a woman.
>Because until fairly recently that was part of what defined being a woman.
No, that defined the legal status of women within society, not WHAT a woman was.
Are you being serious right now, bro? You seem to be very, very easily confused by shit that isn't ever and has never been a problem for normal people.
What defines a woman is socially determined, including by laws and there are countless historical examples of it ignoring sexual characteristics.
I'm not saying I necessarily support the modern liberal view of what a woman is, but ultimately if that becomes the common view enforced by law then there isn't much you can do about it.
Personally I think the whole thing is a stupid compromise and in the long run gender will functionally disappear altogether.
>arrgghhhh is that more c02 in the atmosphere something literally required to make plants grow... IM GOING INSAAAAAANE!
There's something called balance Black person. Disrupt your balance and you fall. It's the same thing.
look up c3 vs c4 photosynthesis, turns out higher co2 means desert plants (water efficient ones) grow way better, while temperate plants don´t really care or only slightly better off. But for stopping desertification its a wonderful thing.
I'm not a climatetard but isn't the issue with vehicle exhaust moreso the toxic Carbon-Monoxide?
no
And yet even with all of those cars, planes, boats and helicopters it still doesn't amount to the same pollution that all of these same big gas and energy companies put out every year. The biggest hypocrisy is gas companies having scientific research of climate change in the 70's yet they gas light everyone else into thinking it's our fault and our job to clean up this planet when the majority of our pollution is caused by these same companies.
Just the yachts pollute more than the poorest billion in the world. You will eat the bugs
>Just the yachts pollute more than the poorest billion in the world
Musk takes 6 minute flights in his private jet all the fricking time. I'll take Arnie driving his zombie truck to the nearest charity drive over Elon Cuck any day of the week.
>yet they gas light everyone else into thinking it's our fault and our job to clean up this planet when the majority of our pollution is caused by these same companies
Black person, companies create pollution as a byproduct of creating the products and services YOU want and need. They don't do it for shits and giggles.
>Uhhh you see a company made of hundreds of people making products/services for hundreds of thousands of people makes more pollution than ONE celebrity so um actually they're NOT massively hypocritical so yeah
Typical high-Estrogen sausage-lipped climatetard soi-chuggers; either so stupid the point went straight over your head, or you intentionally "don't get" the point because the point is something you don't want to/can't argue about.
Lol chapotroony-tier logic.
>why yes I am a heckin communist but I literally cannot stop consooming Slave Labor Product #4828592402 because... euuhhmmm... we live in a heckin society and there is no ethical consumption under capitalism so I can't limit myself from feeding the capitalist machine but trust me we are heckin strong and will bring about a revolution
Who fricking cares? If you have the luxury to worry about something as abstract as climate change then you must live a pretty chill life
the point is they are telling everyone else to not drive cars and shit
Are they?
i dunno about the others but yeah leo does climate shit will flying to the events in his jet
Does he tell "everyone else to not drive cars and shit"?
No he doesn't, anon is just a fricking moron trying to make a bait thread. How about these huge energy conglomerates do something instead on a mass scale.
>bro, it's ok if we poison the planet because arnold and leonardo di caprio have expensive cars!
The inherent argument is that the average person who emits relatively little should make significant sacrifices to their quality of life whilst multi-millionaire celebrities that produce significantly more Co2 do nothing except lecture you. Perhaps they should lead by example. The planet is ending but it's not apparently ending enough to own one house or fly economy, they need that private jet; how else will Leo frick some JB
>significant sacrifices to their quality of life
Such as?
Typical climatetard stiff.
Don't own a car, use "public transportation". Don't eat eat meat, eat onions-paste and bugs. Don't live in suburban and rural areas, live in the more efficient cities in a human-hive. Pay higher taxes. Buy "carbon credits". Don't reproduce (if you're white).
They aren’t telling average people to do that, they’re advocating people to wake up to the climate disaster and push for change and have society as a whole adapt to it and fight to mitigate the rising problems rather than turning a blind eye and going “oh yeah, then why does snow still exist, libtard? OWNED!”
That’s why you can’t actually debate the actual issue and instead just do ad hominem.
>That’s why you can’t actually debate the actual issue and instead just do ad hominem.
I wish you could see the irony but you've made it absolutly clear that anything written above the leve of a grade schooler far eclipses your mental capabilities.
You're being disingenuous. What do you think "have society change and adapt" means if not a reduced quality of life. If you're being sincere you don't understand your own politics. The inherent argument is people consume too much so they should consume less, you can dress it up however you want but that's reality
Don't eat meat, don't drive anywhere or have a fast car, don't take a holiday, don't have kids, live in a tiny rental
>Don't eat meat, don't drive anywhere or have a fast car, don't take a holiday, don't have kids, live in a tiny rental
who said that?
God this is pathetic, stop playing stupid
So nobody said that and is some schizo scenario you made up?
>Eat less meat: UN Climate-change report calls for change to human diet - Nature
>Here's what your hamburger is to the climate - Forbes
>Meat eating is a big climate issue - Theconversation
>Want to fight climate change? Have fewer children - Guaridan
>How our daily travel harms the planet - BBC
I could go on forever but we all know you're being disingenuous and are just wasting time
>eat less meat = don't eat meat
How much is "less"?
Oh wait, that's the point: it's intentionally nebulous so that sooner or later you can get it to "no meat".
The average diet has meat as a tiny minority any way. Stop pretending that Leftcucks don't have a religious-tier vendetta against meat-eating.
Take your meds, chud.
Eat shit out of my ass, gay.
You know it’s actually more healthy to not stuff your face with red meat every day, right? And raising beef is highly wasteful use of resources and consumes needlessly water, land and feed. Just by eating more chicken instead red meat reduces a lot of your average CO2 footprint.
Who gives a frick homosexual. Cattle live on land that’s only good for grazing.
Based and correct
And you just KNOW that these rich hypocritical homosexuals will be sipping wine and eating steak and laughing after meat is made too expensive to afford for the working class/outright illegal and we proles are instead eating crickets and plant-gruel.
Reduced quality of life is unavoidable, you stupid frick. It’s a question to what degree we can mitigate it because food shortages, extreme weather conditions, pandemics, etc. will keep becoming bigger and bigger problems as the temperatures rise. But as expected all you idiots can do is do “uh-nuh, I DON’T WANNA DO ANYTHING” like a child and cry that you can’t be hedonistic pampered babies.
I'm not going to willingly reduce my quality of life for the sake of a state and polity that exists to exploit me.
When I have political power it will be my responsibility to deal with climate change, until then you will have to force me.
As expected of a selfish child.
Tax meat into being a luxury good.
Make energy prices 30% of my income.
Ban passenger air travel.
Make cars unaffordable.
Go for it, you have the power to do all of these things.
Just don't ever expect me to be happy about it.
We aren't all in this together.
>Go for it, you have the power to do all of these things.
homie, who do you think you're talking to?
>I'm going to pollute the planet because I'm a wageslave
>Reduced quality of life is unavoidable, you stupid frick.
Why did it take you 100+ posts to admit that.
>GIVE ME CONTROL OVER YOUR LIFE OR YOU'RE A CHILD
Fricking lol. Your fat ads thought this was an epic own too.
>Reduced quality of life is unavoidable
Ok, why don't you lead by example and reduce your life's quality first, homosexual? :^)
>and push for change and have society as a whole adapt to it and fight to mitigate the rising problems
And the "changes" are always shit like
Disengenuous moron.
>they tell me to eat le bugs and not reproduce!!!
Imagine getting brainwashed by a board full of schizos and virgins.
Black person BOTH those things have been on the cover of TIME Magazine.
Typical lefttard gaslighting. "You're crazy, that's not happening and nobody ACTUALLY supports that" now, "Its happening and we supported it all along and now it's too late for you to stop us :^)" later.
If the solutions were easy you babies wouldn’t have spent several decades whining and stopping anything to be done about it. It really showcases the entitled narcissism when it’s all about how aggravated you are that a global crisis mildly inconveniences you now, not what long term dangers it poses to everyone.
>WAAAAAAH WAAAAAAH WAAAAAAH
>trying to accuse ANYONE ELSE of being a "baby"
Holy shit, lol.
Ah yes, people trying to address these complex problems are the babies, not the people who just whine about not wanting to do anything and how any proposed change is automatically bad.
>trying to address these complex problems are the babies
You "address" them by demanding I reduce my quality of life and then pitch an absolute seething fit when I say "No thank you" or WORSE when I point out the problems in your proposed "solutions".
You keep refusing to acknowledge the root problem that forces us to make bigger and bigger changes and every step of the way you whine about not wanting to do anything because you don’t like it.
You are a parasite and a do nothing waste of space and resources.
Haha frick off homosexual. No one is willing to put up with your bullshit because you made up some climate bullshit.
It’s fricking non sense. Everyone knows it’s non sense. You just attribute occasional phenomenon with a trend. Like forest fires in California…. Which has always had forest fires.
It’s a grift just like the race shit.
California is now basically burning around the year instead of a specific season. Entire towns are burned down to the ground regularly. But who cares about that, right.
I could give a frick. Correct.
>dude you're "entitled" and "a baby" because you want to eat burgers, own a vehicle and live outside a city
Lol keep it up you petulant little homosexual. Your squealing is music to my ears.
>this Black person unironically thinks you fight climate change by putting tree emojis in your twitter bio
>the planet is ending
The planet is doing just fine, see Tchernobyl exclusion zone
They want us peasants to comply to their rules not them.
>L-LOOK HE HAS 12 CARS COLLECTING DUST IN HIS GARAGE, THATS ABOUT THE SAME AS A BP OIL SPILLAGE!!!
Conservatives are so fricking stupid.
Don't you mean shekelbot neo-libs?
>shekelbot neo-libs
I mean I did say conservatives.
https://thecorrespondent.com/796/yes-its-all-the-fault-of-big-oil-facebook-and-the-system-but-lets-talk-about-you-this-time
I don’t think about actors at all.
You know there’s more to the environment than the CO2 in the air right. I have a ton for motorized vehicles, but I pollute way less than a onions homosexual with their latest ev and phone. Also the most obvious sign of pollution is littering and I don’t see anything done about that. This whole climate change bullshit is just a narrative to introduce new taxes and markets.
>hmm you want megacorporations to stop polluting 999999999999999999999999 times more than a car collection ever could yet own cars, curious!
I don't know about you guys, but I think we should be giving up non-essential things, like nutritious food, heating and readily available transportation, for the sake of the climate.
We need to make it easier for the people who manage society (not us); we need to make it easier for them to balance the climate budget.
They shouldn't have to ask us or give us anything for it.
If we don't do it then we will be un-avoidably killed by climate change, something who's effects cannot, in any way, be mitigated by other means.
When people die during climate change caused droughts or flooding, that's because of climate change, not because they starved or were drowned, but because you are still eating beef.
I am enjoying this thread
Threadly reminder the % of CO2 in our atmosphere is 0.04.
Of that 0.04% less than 4% is manmade.
Obviously wrong lol.
kek
>it's just a tiny bit of cyanide bro do you realize how much ordinary blood there is in proportion?
That is a very stupid line of reasoning.
he's not debating the 0.04% figure, you dumb fat Black person, he's debating the 4% figure. no wonder your people can't swim
>Of that 0.04% less than 4% is manmade.
More like 1/3
did you know the tides only affect the depth of the ocean by a little over 0.1%?
but guess what, you dumb fat Black person. that's still enough to drive all the world's ocean currents
The reason I'm calling you schizos is because you're schizos are talking to me as if I'm some higher-up in le secret cabal that wants to cut off your burger consumption of something and not some ordinary guy on Cinemaphile on Saturday.
Or am I? Fricking schizos.
You do realize they are telling you to vote for politicians that will take away or at least limit people that own all that shit?
there is not a single person in congress who would ever seriously contemplate a bill that would limit how many vehicles a person can own
No but a ban on ICE vehicles is considered in many countries around the world.
Black person are you being serious right now? California is banning leather and has already banned "Gaming PC's".
>implying celebrities, especially leftist celebrities, will be beholden to the same laws the common man is
Fricking kek. The law has never been enforced equally on celebrities and never will be.
Name one law that they aren't beholden to like us
Leo is having sex and that chud is banned from having sex by the evil Democrats and Sleepy Joe!!!!
The "don't have sex with children" law.
Lel, anyone can avoid that law, just go to Mexico or something
>everyone I don't agree with politically fricks children
Except I didn't say that? I said that it was a common thing for "celebrities", i.e. the wealthy and connected. Attack me, not the Strawman.
I currently live on a half acre plot of land in an old wooden house, heated by firewood, water drawn from a well. I grow about 20% of my calories on-site, and drive an EV for 95% of the miles I cover by car.
Soon I plan to move to a smaller house on a larger plot of land, switch to a bicycle for most of my transportation, and attempt to nudge the on-site calories as close to 100% as possible.
Thing is this shit doesn't scale to everybody. We simply have too many people for this kind of lifestyle, even if you ignore the other problems with attempting to scale it up and the fact that most people simply aren't willing to transition to a lower energy lifestyle even if it was offered to them.
When, if, the weather and climate shift so much that crops are failing, productivity plummets, and the modern standard of life and food availability plummets. IF that happens, it's never going to be some kumbaya shift to wearing straw hats and living like the amish. There's going to be a lot of blood.
I'm not a fricking saint. I do this because I don't plan on being anywhere near civilization in my later life if I can possibly avoid it. Because it's probably going to get messy.
Thing is, while I think this is gonna happen in future I can't say how soon that's going to be. It might end up being completely irrelevant in my lifetime. At which point I'm in some kind of eco-pascal's wager and have wasted a lot of life living less comfortably than I might if I'd made a different bet on the near future.
>I'm not a vaccine expert anymore, I'm a climate expert now
You're right, Leftists like Doreen should shut the frick up.
>climate expert
Something YOU are instead, obviously.
>Is that.....(GASP)...someone calling out a celebrity on their hypocrisy?!?! DON'T WORRY, LEO-SAMA!!! I'LL PROTECT YOU WITH MY VIRGINIIIIIIIIIIITY!!!!!!
Why are climatetards so fricking cringe, bros?
no one is defending celebrities here though, take your meds
>no one is defending celebrities here though
AH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
Why do you just openly lie?
ok moron
i don't drive, not because i care about the environment (i frequently throw recyclable shit in the trash), but simply because i have too much anxiety and autism
>all the crying ecohomosexuals itt