What Is A Woman 2022 1080p HDTV h264-UNKNoWN

What Is A Woman 2022 1080p HDTV h264-UNKNoWN
>What Is A Woman 2022 1080p HDTV h264-UNKNoWN

Get your DDL links at
https://comment.rlsbb.ru/what-is-a-woman-2022-1080p-hdtv-h264-unknown/
Clicknupload has the best speed for free. For some reason no mainstream public torrent site has this. Not rar, piratebay, 1337x, limetorrents, or any others.

https://pirateproxy.live has a webrip, that's it. https://pirateproxy.live/torrent/59590436/What.Is.A.Woman.2022.1080p.H264.AAC.WEBRip.mp4

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You're literally obsessed with transfolk

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you’re literally not a woman

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I think the torrent scene has been infiltrated by trannies. I had no idea.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        nice deflection. what's next, telling me to dilate? you're running low on insults.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It IS kinda silly telling you to dilate when 99% of you porn-drunk weirdos keep the wiener.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's no different from being unable to look away from a car-crash.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Shouldn’t have tried to force me to believe a lie and go after kids.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Your side is the one going after kids. One of you fricking nuts literally killed 20 primary school kids the other week and y'all pretend that this is "the price of freedom"

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, rights matter even when sad things happen.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Oh and he played the false equivalence card

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You believe its okay to castrate children. You perverse degenerate. I hope you know that every waking moment of every day half of this country is praying for the day when they can see people like you flayed alive after being convicted in a court of law.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            No, chud. Most people in this country accept transfolks. However, everyone hates incels. That's why you are unemployed and never have sex.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >this right winger did bad thing that means left wingers can and should pump your kids full of experimental drugs
          no.
          cope.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          A one off tragedy by a demonic teenager does not give you leeway to mutilate children you sick frick.
          You're political console wars rotten brain has to seeing things as some tit for tat game.
          You're blind to the shit people you consider on "your side" do and it doesn't help the MSM don't point them out.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >one off
            Now this is genuine dishonesty

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Real dishonesty was bringing up apolitical shooter because he had higher kill count. Bufallo shooter would have been better example, even though he wasnt mainstream right winger.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I wasn't the guy you were even originally talking to, calling it a one off is stupid. We have a genuine mental health crisis in this country and brushing something like this off, even in jest, is completely irresponsible.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                These medialized mass shootings form just a small fraction of gun deaths. The real mental health crisis are suicides by guns, which are actually over half of all gun deaths.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              It isn't, mass shootings such as that are anomalies that shouldn't decide policy.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                They still happen, no one said anything about passing teactinar laws. "One off" was a stupid thing to say.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                reactionary laws*

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >no one said anything about passing reactionary laws

                Then what was your point?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                See

                I wasn't the guy you were even originally talking to, calling it a one off is stupid. We have a genuine mental health crisis in this country and brushing something like this off, even in jest, is completely irresponsible.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Ok, so then you're ultimately asking for some type of action or policy in response, yes?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Please stop trying to read into something that wasn't explicitly said.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Ok, you said that. Why? Either you'd like some type of policy in response or ??

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                So that poster wouldn't trivialize kids dying as a "one off" event? You can talk policy if you want, I won't stop you.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                It is a one off. Many people die every day, there's probably a fair amount of people being raped and murdered right as we're posting now. Stop being a fricking b***h.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                What an awful argument.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Yours isn't even an argument. It was a one off, you can't even say that it isn't, just that calling it so hurts your feelings. Grow up.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Mass shootings are a small part of overall gun deaths, yes. To call it a one off is just stupidity. I know you're trying to get a rise out of me, but I ask you brother, find God and you will find peace.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                They're one offs, again your only argument against that is it hurts your feelings.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                There's more children getting murdered by incel spree shootings each year than there's children going on HRT.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I see you're illiterate on statistics.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                And? More people die from X than from Y. Apples and oranges.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                And more children are killed by Black folk than incels. How do we solve the Black person problem anon? Ban all Black folk?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                degree of impact does not change the evil of certain actions. More people are robbed than murdered so let’s not worry about murder by your logic

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Ah yes the your side kills children defense

          >Democrats: we must used tax payer money to pay for sex change for children!
          >GOP: we must shoot children!

          I can't imagine GOp winning the mid term

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Now that's a yikes moment, my dude.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Us trying to change society to fit our preferences isn't culture war!
      >You noticing and responding to our attempts is culture war!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >You're literally obsessed with pedophiles and sodomites that put people in jail for not castrating their kids
      "yes"

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Literally every company shoving trannies in my face for 1/12 of the year
      >"LOL obsessed"

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >1/12 of the year
        m8 it's 12/12 of the year, this month is just extra over the top month

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Frick, the google toon thing has an animation with parading trans flags (the one with the stripe for brown people) held by brown hands if you click on it

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I’ve seen that shit promoted on the front page of YouTube on the YouTube icon a few days ago. The powers that be are the ones obsessed with grooming children. Can’t just let evil like that go unnoticed

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Why do gays always use word "folk"? At this point I want to strangle someone every time I see it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The term people is considered too normal
        They always have to differentiate themselves in some quirky way

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They like to roleplay as the working class, and it's a conveniently gender-neutral term
        >folks
        >y'all

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's not just gays, it's anybody trying to be folksy

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Why do you have folx so much?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The Weimar types that survived the Nazis picked it up from them.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You are not a woman.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >obsessed
      kek, yeh we are obsessed to make you seethe harder and 41% yourself to oblivion

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >let me frick your kids >:(
      No.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >dude stop paying attention and let us fundamentally alter society to appease .4% of the population and remove millennia old pillars of human interaction

      When you have corporations engaging in your moronic effort to completely erase the line between men and women, people are going to notice and they're going to fricking hate you

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      just please stop pushing your mental illness on everyone. that's why you've received this strong backlash from the normalfolk.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >this documentary kills the troony janny

    You're literally obsessed with transfolk

    kys

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I watched it on YouTube last night. It was okay.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Is it actually interesting or mostly daily wire preaching to the choir?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The scene with the gender studies professor is hilarious. The whole movie is one big troll. I only got halfway through before it was taken off youtube, and I didn't download it. It didn't seem preachy to me.
      I am very surprised at how few torrents there are for this. Every piece of shit that gets released has a torrent, but this does not. Big think.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        there's a very upsetting interview with a regretful FtM later in the movie which is worth seeing

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          felt kind of bad for that woman to be honest, it's her own fault for falling for it but still

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >femaloid throws away her female life on easy mode
          >regrets it
          Tough shit, welcome to being treated like a man, c**t.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Six inches of hair growing inside my urethra

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >say the drugs are used for castration for criminals and pedophiles
            >NOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T SAY THAT

            that's how you know these people are fricking evil, literally chemically castrating children and hiding the fact that they're doing it

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That homosexual professor was hilarious as frick. you can tell his body language is getting more and more defensive the longer the interview takes. They are all are.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >For some reason no mainstream public torrent site has this. Not rar, piratebay, 1337x, limetorrents, or any others.

        >I am very surprised at how few torrents there are for this. Every piece of shit that gets released has a torrent, but this does not. Big think.

        Everyone already knows what a woman is.
        Everyone already knows trannies are crazy.

        So why would you expect a bunch of torrents for this shit?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Everyone already knows trannies are crazy.
          Tell that to the White House.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            White House also knows what a woman is and that trannies are crazy, but they have a depopulation agenda so they like it.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Fair.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          What movie is that? Dressed to Kill?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's a lot of intellectual dishonesty and fallacies. Not a single real "gotcha". There was a troony who seemed regretful of their choices but outside of that, it's pure propaganda that doesn't answer any questions, ironically.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Name 5

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          it's the opposite, please show me the intelectual dishonesties and fallacies in the documentary
          It came across as pretty unbiased to me, he just let them talk and interjected every now and then

          It's been talked about ad nauseam on this board, I'm not going down the rabbit hole again. If you truly thought this was an objective look at the topic then I would question your objectivity in the first place. Doesn't shed light on the root of the troony problem, just reiterates right wing arguments.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Can't name any fallacies. Thought so.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            the fact that you say "right wing argument" in a negative light tells us everything

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Name them

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        it's the opposite, please show me the intelectual dishonesties and fallacies in the documentary
        It came across as pretty unbiased to me, he just let them talk and interjected every now and then

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >intellectual dishonesty
        Oh you definitely ywnbaw.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Is that from a helicopter?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Remember, trannies and their worshippers can only defend the "troons are women" in one of two ways.

        >Anyone who considers themselves a woman is a woman!
        This is circular reasoning and doesn't actually give a definition. It's like me saying "I am a zorp, because I consider myself a zorp." That does nothing to tell you what a zorp is.

        >Well you say a woman is an adult, female human. Which is a human with XX chromosomes, but what about XXY or [insert edge case or extremely rare deviation here]? Where do you draw the line?
        Tell them they can only give you these deviations and edge cases because they do in fact know where the line is, it's an adult, female human.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          if he had been astute or understood the topic enough to express these ideas coherently in interview, for example the idea that trans only reinforces gender stereotypes and how that juxtaposes feminist ideas or something then it might have been far more interesting conversation
          lmao all he had to do was find a lefty terf to sick on some of them and let them go at it stand back and watch. he really shot himself in the foot. yes of course Cinemaphile liked it because you aren't normies and are too autistic to understand how other people interpret this

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >normies are all read feminist theory so attacking gender stereotypes would actually be the way to get them on your side!

            Glow.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The edge cases isn't even a defense, if you have a Y chromosome you can't get pregnant but you can produce sperm. XXYs are biologically men but often ugly ones.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I know that, but they still do it.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          i watched it on youtube yesterday
          its pretty based ngl
          best scene where this completely moronic professor tried to explain what a woman is by saying that a woman is a woman
          and matt first asked
          1. do you know what circular reasoning is
          2. can you define woman without using the word woman
          lmao

          >muh circular reasoning and muh definitions
          Give me a non-circular definition of woman that the average person throughout the past millenium would accept. Try it, chud.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            No, you give me a definition that my dad would accept using only words that start with Z while standing on a unicycle on one leg and juggling bowling pins, in clown makeup.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            XX (1920s, Theophilus Painter)

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              it's been given multiple times [...]
              >it's easy and millions of people keep saying it yet the troony types ignore it and claim we can't define a woman either

              Nobody prior to 1905 would accept this definition since nobody knew about chromosomes before then. Have you ever seen a chromosome?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Oh no the definition is imperfect, now you give literally any definition.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Nobody would have described water as H2O 500 years ago. Doesn’t change the reality of it b***h boy

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                better scarp everything invented the last 100 years then pal, no one back then would know or understand it

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Would cavemen who lived prior to the concept of a "mammal" accept the definition of a dog as a mammal? Ancient people would probably define it as "that tame little hairy beast that goes woof woof". Does that mean I'm a dog if I put on a dog costume?

                so you admit that definitions change over time along with the culture?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Subjective ones yes not objective ones like the biological gender of humans

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                So nobody could objectively define human until 1905? How do you know that definition is the right one given that you are willing to discard all others?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                *woman, not human

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                The definition of human wasn’t changed in 1905 you dipshit. People knew what humans were and the difference between a man and a woman for centuries

                Moreover, modern zeitgeist’s understating of “gender” is a puddle compared to the sea of traditional wisdom, culture and rituals that has brought society to the modern age.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Definition changes don't change material reality. This is the problem with the "changing the definition in the dictionary changes reality" approach. Dictionaries document use of language, not define it.

                Just because we now call pantaloons pants does not in fact mean they stopped being pieces of clothing worn on the legs when we started calling them pants.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Hey, the definition of 'woman' or 'man' might mysteriously change back to XX and XY then

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                the definitions change over time yes, sometimes for political reasons sometimes out of stupidity or ignorance, you know what doesn't change? the thing itself, you will never be a woman

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                No one's denying this, moron

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Would cavemen who lived prior to the concept of a "mammal" accept the definition of a dog as a mammal? Ancient people would probably define it as "that tame little hairy beast that goes woof woof". Does that mean I'm a dog if I put on a dog costume?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I know you're just baiting and won't change your views, but the 'XX chromosomes' explanation can be extrapolated to include what those chromosomes denote. Naturally higher vocal range, naturally wider hips, natural ability to have children, naturally smaller frames, naturally occurring veganas, natural ability to have periods, and naturally not having a penis.

                All of these are examples of how to define women.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Yes actually I have. You can literally look at them under a microscope and people do so for medical reasons all the time

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                They may not have known what chromosomes were but they would not have generally accepted people born with different chromosomes as women. As of today, it's the most accurate way to define it.
                It's like asking to give a definition of a star that people would have accepted for thousands of years. People thought stars were different things over the last millennium, but if you educated people on what stars actually were from a thousand years ago they would still agree it's the same thing.
                If you want a less medical definition in common language, though, see:

                An adult human female. A female being someone who was born with a vegana.
                This is barring some hormonal and chromosomal conditions, but someone may choose to present as a woman if they were born with such conditions, if they have some or all of the same physical attributes as a typical woman.
                A typical woman is smaller than a man, has a thinner frame, wider hips, and has softer features. She has a higher voice and is generally more agreeable than a man. A woman has a vegana.
                It is not medically possible for a human who has gone through male puberty to gain all of these attributes.
                It is not moral to induce hormonal conditions in children to gain these attributes.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You said the past millenium. Anyway it is more easy than you think. 1 There's A and B. 2 When A and B engage in copulation there's reproduction 3 When there's reproduction there's more of these A and B specimens 4 We call "A woman" A or B because A can't be B or B can't be A, there you go, simple logic.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Absolutely fantastic bait, 11/10 troll lmfao. Gg.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            it's been given multiple times

            a woman is a human with XX chromosomes, women usually refers to an adult women with XX chromosomes, and girl typically for a child human with XX chromosomes
            it's easy and millions of people keep saying it yet the troony types ignore it and claim we can't define a woman either, as always they are completely deluded

            >it's easy and millions of people keep saying it yet the troony types ignore it and claim we can't define a woman either

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Women have veganas.
            There, literally every single human culture to ever exist would agree with that.
            >b-b-but what about
            Things aren't defined by anomalies and exceptions.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Women are adult, female women that likely have the capability of producing children outside of some sort of injury or deformity.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Women are adult, female women
              Lmao you call this non-circular???

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                It isn't, correct. And good job ignoring the rest of it. Thank you for conceding.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Sorry, meant "human" not "women."

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            An adult human female. A female being someone who was born with a vegana.
            This is barring some hormonal and chromosomal conditions, but someone may choose to present as a woman if they were born with such conditions, if they have some or all of the same physical attributes as a typical woman.
            A typical woman is smaller than a man, has a thinner frame, wider hips, and has softer features. She has a higher voice and is generally more agreeable than a man. A woman has a vegana.
            It is not medically possible for a human who has gone through male puberty to gain all of these attributes.
            It is not moral to induce hormonal conditions in children to gain these attributes.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            woman [ woom-uhn ]
            an adult female person. Compare man (def. 1), girl (def. 1).

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Even that Black person woman in Africa living in a hut can tell it straight to him that a woman is a person who can give birth because it's their right by nature. They don't need to implant a fake uterus into their body to 'experience' childbirth or steal girls dirty tampons to experience menstruation

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >It's a lot of intellectual dishonesty and fallacies
        you forgot the specify that this is on the side of the people who can't answer what a woman is

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        he got several professionals to say that age blockers are completely reversible and safe and then confronted them with the fact that shit can cause osteoporosis in kids and is literal medical castration used on pedophiles and they couldn't deny it. i would say that was a "gotcha" moment. either way that's not what the movie is about, it's about getting a good look at all the leaders and prominent figures of the LGBTQ+ movement socially and medically so you can decide wether or not you want them to have anything to do with your children

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >be troony
        >talk about intellectual dishonesty

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >talk about intellectual dishonesty
          >and fallacies

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >intellectual dishonesty
        You mean like academia pretending that XY and XX don’t exist?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          There you go being dishonest again. Male and female exist, women and men are now malleable terms.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >women and men are now malleable terms
            They're only malleable to you because you insist they are. What is a woman? What is a man?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I’m not dishonest. Only XY can be men; only XX can be women. This is science you dumb troony. We already won without even trying.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Male and female exist
            Based on past examples I have observed, you probably only pretend to believe this to get others on your side.
            At the very least, troony supporters tend not to agree.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        the only intelectual dishonest in the documentary came from the shitlib teacher that danced around and refused to answer the question
        What is a woman?
        Keep coping tho

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Lol ok ESL

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            That's right, the esl african tribe men know what is a woman, you don't, cope

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >doesn't answer any questions
        Strange considering he was asking experts on the matter. I guess he deceptively edited out all the good answers, huh?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >It's a lot of intellectual dishonesty
        Either you or someone else keep posting this yet you have no examples.
        You're hoping some anon will just take it and run with it, huh?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        And at the end of it
        Neither You nor the trannies in the documentary can explain what a woman is

        What is a woman?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Adult human born female with XX chromosomes in most cells of her body
          >but that's the biological definition of sex
          yes. sex defines men and women.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          a woman is a human with XX chromosomes, women usually refers to an adult women with XX chromosomes, and girl typically for a child human with XX chromosomes
          it's easy and millions of people keep saying it yet the troony types ignore it and claim we can't define a woman either, as always they are completely deluded

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      it's really unbiased, i was expecting more of gotcha moments like ben shapiro tends to do to own the shitlibs, but it's not
      It's mostly about the industry itself, drugs taken, the original theorists of the ideology, people talking about their mistakes when they transitioned etc
      The woman that transitioned and started talking about the industry is a real redpill
      The troons seething at this just haven't watched this or are afraid because they know it's way to unbiased and will redpill tons of centrists and right wingers on this issue

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >it's really unbiased,
        >this is what amerricans actually believev
        i wrote a whole essay in a /misc/ thread about it and nobody cared
        despite his stone faced demeanour he makes his stance too apparent and sacrifices truly open exploration with his interviewees. he has a lot of material on kids that could frame the whole thing in a way to make it much more palatable to a normie but refuses to prioritise that over trying to outsmart adults
        he should have ended on the peterson joke instead of that cringe shit with his wife.
        stuff like reading his own book and then that he took it to africa with him undermined any trust i had in him.
        all of his arguments were regurgitated straight from /misc/ he didn't seem to have any original idea about it and tried to steer conversations to his prepared answers instead of arguing directly (dificult to notice this because for whatever reason the people always walk into his quuestions easily and aren't prepared to answer years old talking points, almost as if he picked moronic people on purpose)

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I'm not that anon, so I won't say it's unbiased. It absolutely is biased... To reality. Play all the fricking word games you want, we all know that troons aren't women.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            What's the point in presenting an argument if all we get are stupid replies like yours?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              because leftists don't deserve honest replies and arguments, the fact that you get them shows that most conservatives are still moronic and view you as human and not a brainwashed npc

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Again, you're just playing word games that are irrelevant to the topic at hand. Eat shit.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            So what if the arguments look like their from pol?
            That doesn't mean anything, point to me the fallacies in the documentary

            i'm not the guy you are arguing with
            i'm not trying to say i agree with either side of the video
            i'm just telling you that it was objectively bad journalism

            So what if the arguments look like their from pol?
            That doesn't mean anything, point to me the fallacies in the documentary

            >So what if the arguments look like their from pol?
            other than it gives them something to point to and say ok Cinemaphile bad so this guy is bad (i don't agree with this i'm saying be careful), nothing really, but its part of a bigger problem where he comes off as having read some threads, not really formed his own ideas about the subject and then tried to bring these opinions into an argument without really understanding the topics or being able to defend or explain what he's saying.
            like he talks about circular reasoning a lot and then it just ends, i think it would be more powerful if he probed them a little more like asking specifics like clothes makeup etc or brought up feminist perspective, but he won;t do that because he hasn't really investigated the topic at all or understand anything about it, he's only interested in humiliating these people.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >i'm not trying to say i agree with either side of the video
              No one believes you, homosexual.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >brought up feminist perspective
              That perspective helped get us to this point to begin with. So no, if you want to actually succeed you wouldn't want to bring it up.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              There's nothing to understand about a simple topic as
              what is a woman?
              answer the question and stop dancing around it, nobody is interested in your delusions and pilpulling, answer the question or be mocked like the delusional leftist ideologue moron that u you are

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          So what if the arguments look like their from pol?
          That doesn't mean anything, point to me the fallacies in the documentary

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >he picked moronic people on purpose
          he asked people of all backgrounds, most of which were prominent in the LGBTQ scene, like the most well known sex change doctor in the US and a university professor along with other doctors and professionals and politicians. it's either the most educated individuals of the LGBTQ community are moronic and can't argue for shit or there are no actual arguments in favor of children trooning our

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            he didn't really explain any of his choices.
            he went to see a sex change surgeon but there is no justifying or explanitory lead in such as 'dr xx has been vocal recently anout xyz in media blah blah blah' which is common in documentaries. he says nothing because otherwise his intros would be
            >i went to see sex change doctor because it was trans and i wanted to embarass her
            >i went to see this college professor because he's a queer homosexual who clearly has a short fuse and will look ridiculous on camera
            >i went to see this child psychologist because i watched a youtube where she is hippy dippy shroomed out with the faries and will make me look respectable in comparison
            normally when you interview people you explain why specifically them, not just 'a college professor' and not say why you picked one randomly out of hundreds, and normally its someome who has had news coverage or is an advocate because then we all know that they are going to be cognisant and worthwhile at debate.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              You can just say that there's no standard you'd accept for it, we all know it. You're just a nitpicking homosexual playing word games.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                what??
                do you need me to explain this more slowly?
                have you ever seen a documentary with interviews before?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You're not saying anything of substance. You're just being a nitpicking homosexual.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                i'm explaining to you that if you want to build an argument then you have to demonstrate the foundation and legitimacy of your sources.
                otherwise you are no better than them
                >i'm a woman because i say so
                >i'm an authority on this topic because you are filming me
                thats you. you are literally them.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                No one believes you, homosexual.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                israelitery and homosexualry.
                Women also complain that all men care about is sex, meanwhile the world is inundated with women dispensing sexual imagery and selling selling Selling sex.

                It’s just a matter of principle, when I see someone who talks like you, when someone tells me the holocaust is the most well documented event in history, when they say that science experts have proven Male and Female is imaginary, I just know this is the hand of the israelite at work. You are a israelite.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >he picked Dr. Bowers just to embarrass "her"!
              Dr. Bowers is literally at the forefront of SRS. He's a pioneer in new procedures, one of the top experts on the subject if not THE top expert. It's not some random troony doctor he picked just to call her a troony.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Objection, dishonest and subject definition of expert.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >You're a transwoman...
                >No I'm a woman! But with a transwoman background
                b***h YOU'RE A troony THEN YOU JUST ADMITTED IT

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Then put it in the doc. I shouldnt have to visit Cinemaphile to find that out.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >almost as if he picked moronic people on purpose)
          He picked an Ivy League college professor who specializes in gender studies, a doctor who's been working with "trans kids" for 20 years, another doctor of I Am Jazz fame, a licensed psychiatrist, a prominent politician...
          Literally all people who are highly educated and on the forefront of spreading gender ideology. Who the hell should he have interviewed instead? Jennifer Pritzker and George Soros?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >i wrote a whole essay in a /misc/ thread about it and nobody cared
          Go to 4plebs and get the archive link or frick off with your lies.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            i have just basically regurgitated what i said itt anyway
            /380822899/#q380843049

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          This. it's the same thing with crowder..he just finds moronic college students to "debate". There nothing interesting about that.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Why can't you answer the fact that he interviewed doctorates, politicians and college professors?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              All of those people can be moronic too. do you really think college degrees make people geniuses? Do you think politicians are smart too?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I would expect doctors and policymakers to at least have basic grasp on reality.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                you better lower your expectations my dude it’s the current year in America. Talking about reality will cause you to lose your job

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, they are moronic, but they are the prominent figures on the forefront of this movement, this only speaks to the legitimacy of the movement, not to Matt's cherry picking skills.
                I'm very present in this sphere and the only people that aren't completely moronic are the ones who would be critical of the trans movement, which he also interviewed, so that's not his fault.
                It's like complaining that someone interviewed a moron from /misc/ to defend their positions of israeli obsession, christian larping, racist beliefs and national socialist larping. Yeah, you interviewed a moron because only morons hold these positions.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >I'm very present in this sphere
                Elaborate.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I'm a "debatebro" from Youtube.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Destiny?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I actually don't blame you here, since the experts in pro-troonydom often make the same exact arguments moronic college kids make.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            All leftists are moronic tho. Who’s he supposed to debate about this if not them?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              The left does the same thing when they interview low IQ rednecks like borat. It's dishonest on both sides but people eat it up because they love to see people get owned who they disagree with.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They asked a woke doctor if Santa Claus is real if a kid believed he's real

      The professional doctor said " if the kid thinks Santa is real, then yes of course he's real

      Matt Walsh goes: but in the real world. Santa is not real

      Doctor goes : but is real for the kid. So Santa is real

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'd say it's interesting, it's literally one dude going up to people from various walks of life, from people off the street, african tribes, genders, to gender studies professionals, and asking them what a Woman is. One college professor at a university that has truth as its motto gets extremely shaken up and says there's no thing as "the truth", that everyone has their own version of truth.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That's just post-modern pilpul pushed by israelites who get tenure-track professorships then make sure other israelites get the tenure-track jobs, too. If any non-israelite slips through the cracks they toe the line.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Nice

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    is that a man wearing a dress??? Aaaaaaahhh I'm going insaaaaaaaaane.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >What Is A Woman
    Why is it that everyone obsessed with this question is a man?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Because they look like this and have nothing better to do

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Why is every troony?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      women can't engage in sincere discussion/contemplation, they have literal dog brains

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      where were you when jk rowling got camcelled?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    1. No one will click your links unless they’re moronic.

    2. Stop always talking about Trans people you troony.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Lmao at the “why are you so obsessed” cope. It’s basically and admission that they know their worldview is absolutely insane.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Lmao the irony of this post

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        There's no substance with "you're obssesed" argument
        You see it as no problem because you support it and you want to make people that care about it seem uncool and weird, you can make that argument about anything, it's worthless and basically an admission that you're losing

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          whole lot of words to stay you're obsessed

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Look at your response objectively and see that it’s the response of someone who has fricking nothing.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              objectively you're obsessed

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Clicknupload – Part 1 / Part 2
    the "documentary" sounds like a big long ben shapiro compilation youtube video I don't get why the download experence has to be bad too

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    that b***h needs the rope, legitimately evil

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Her argument seemed to be that your thoughts create reality. She thinks Santa exists if a child believes in him and she defines "woman" as whatever it might mean to someone because "it could mean many things to many people".
      It reminds me of Meinong's Jungle:
      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meinong%27s_jungle
      >Meinong, an Austrian philosopher active at the turn of the 20th century, believed that since non-existent things could apparently be referred to, they must have some sort of being, which he termed sosein ("being so"). A unicorn and a pegasus are both non-being; yet it's true that unicorns have horns and pegasi have wings. Thus non-existent things like unicorns, square circles, and golden mountains can have different properties, and must have a 'being such-and-such' even though they lack 'being' proper.[1] The strangeness of such entities led to this ontological realm being referred to as "Meinong's jungle". The jungle is described in Meinong's work Über Annahmen (1902).[2] The name is credited to William C. Kneale, whose Probability and Induction (1949) includes the passage "after wandering in Meinong's jungle of subsistence ... philosophers are now agreed that propositions cannot be regarded as ultimate entities".[2]

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        and yet he was incapable of explaining to her, or the viewer, that if these terms can be assigned arbitrarily then they are of no value

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Meinong is basically reiterating Plato's theory of form.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Every time I see someone bring up "Plato's theory of form" on this board its by some pleb who knows nothing

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It's more like Parmenides

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    45s what's a Women

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >asking leftist doctors about their professional opinion on what a woman is
    >teehee why don't you come on over and we'll tell you!
    >don't forget your insurance card!

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Most trans women who get into sports aren't really very good at all and get surpassed by many cis women. We saw that on olympics

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      And they still end up doing better than if they entered as men, namely being able to actually get into the Olympics in the first place.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      For every man who enters the women’s Olympics team, there is a woman who was once a little girl with a now broken dream to one day compete in the Olympics. Doesn’t sit right with me

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        simp

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Should've trained harder lmao

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Who gives a shit about women’s sports?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You should, but then again you are a childless neet with no future and no lineage. Ironically you are as pathetic as trannies and gays

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The troony that lost at the Olympics was like in his 40s with a nagging shoulder injury, stop playing dumb.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >What Is A Woman
    A miserable little pile of cancer.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >muh dishonest
    Even if you prove the documentary is biased that does nothing to discredit any of the points it made:
    -There is a big financial incentive for the whole movement, anyone who wants to transition at a young age = millions of dollars for big pharma
    -the medical professionals refuse to disclose the very real long term health risks and side effects to hormone therapy and age blockers despite said risks being known and documented
    -telling kids that transitioning will make them feel better and cure their depression is an outright lie that is still perpetuated abd endorsed
    -speaking out against any of the above ruins your repuration, gets you death threats, kills job opportunities and can even get you fined or put in jail
    -the most prominent and educated members of the LGBTQ movement will dance around a simple question for hours because they either can't answer it or know the answer goes against their ideology.

    no one is impressed that you deduced that Matt Walsh is opinionated because you read the /misc/ sticky once, all the above points still stand.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I don't think your post has any merit and frankly the anime discredits you entirely.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        and i know you don't have any arguments

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          That makes two of us then

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >we both know you don't have any arguments
            glad we could see eye to eye

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This is a pretty fair assessment. It's pure pandering and ham-handed in outlining these tired gotchas, but its not entirely ineffective, just boring.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >big pharma

      made up term that means nothing

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Sure, however we all understand what it implies. Pharmaceutical companies paying doctors to push products that aren't actually in the interest of their patients, but in the interest of the doctor and pharmaceutical companies getting paid.

        Stop being disingenuous.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          companies are not entitled to be nice. they simply make money like everyone else. "big pharma" is a dumb boogeyman people who think they live in a movie with a good and bad guys and some secret cabal that runs everything. it doesn't work that way.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >You're technically right but here's a moronic strawman about secret cabals so it doesn't look like I'm conceding

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >companies are not entitled to be nice. they simply make money like everyone else.
            Are you forgetting what a doctor's role is? The influence these 'not nice companies' have over your average doctor is astounding. They get funding, grants, and commissions for pushing products they just have to pretend to believe in. They're briefed on the products by the companies and either go along out of either willful or pure ignorance. They're no better than snake oil salesmen half the time.

            Look up the Hippocratic oath and tell me what it says.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >and either go along out of either
              Sorry. I had a stroke mid sentence.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              "Big pharma" is buzzword parroted by people who don't want to actually look at a complex issue and is easier to just blame one vague entity. It's the same thing with people who say it's "the israelites"
              .do yourself a favor and stop parroting these kind of simplifications if you want to underthings with anything more than a surface level glance.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You're a midwit.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You aren't really saying anything, anon. I've explained myself quite clearly. Why distance yourself so purposelessly? Look up the Hippocratic oath, yet?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >don't you dare use shorthand slang terms for complex industries in casual conversation in front of me

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      - There are financial incentives for ANY kind of treatment, that does not mean it does not help people.
      - Not true, but better education is needed so people receive the best treatment
      - Nobody says it will cure depression, but it does improve quality of life, this has been documented
      - Voicing concerns to help people do not do this, not denying that trans people should be able to transition or arguing to limit availability of treatment do. Also, trans people are the most defenseless sexual minority, even in developed countries
      - Explaining complex topics is not dancing around a topic. Documentaries like this, and the conservative discourse in general want to oversimplify the topics knowing it is not possible, which allows them to say that their oversimplifications are absolute

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >trans people are the most defenseless sexual minority
        Who cares?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >- Nobody says it will cure depression, but it does improve quality of life, this has been documented
        Would you show me these studies so I may look into their funding to see how credible they are? Thank you, anon.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >most defenseless
        >Man in women's bath

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >say that the puberty blockers was chemical castration
    >troony expert agrees but says you’re not supposed to call it chemical castration
    spooky

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Big yikes

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >kem-i-kuhl kas-trey-shuhn
        top kek do americans really?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Never seen a dictionary, zoomer?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I have, they use phonetics alphabet
            >/ˈkemJkl/ /kæˈstreJʃn/

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              IPA only started appearing in dictionaries like thirty years ago. Prior to that they were limited to actual linguistic publications.
              IPA has a learning curve, English Phonetic Alphabet can be picked up in a minute.
              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pronunciation_respelling_for_English

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      woman woman..

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Even if you are on the trans people side, you gotta admit that some of those people that he interviewed were fricking insane. To me it's crazy how most of them are even allowed to be in those positions.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The reassignment butcher saying there were only a few people who disagreed with them is just proof of how delusional these fiends are.
    And it happens a few times in the film.
    Matt will say what about the people on the other side of the argument and they either pretend there are none or there are few.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    will this worm actually produce something worth a damn someday that isn't just placating to the fools falling for his pay-to-view antics?
    anything that might have a chance to connect with the general audience like a Stranger Things or even a Fast and the Furious type schlock?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      those videos like "BEN SHAPIRO MURDERS FEMINIST LIBTARD (with logic) AND BURIES THE BODY (under facts)" was the only time broader audience gave him attention and he desperately still tries to ride that wave despite people being tired of him and his antics
      pretty much Neil deGrasse Tyson of neocons

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Shut In was an OK horror movie.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Unless he posts the nudes of his sister he DEFINTELY has, no.

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    that whole scene with the University professor played out almost exactly like pic rel.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I like how he tried to get aggressive and Matt kept saying truth and he lost that energy

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      life imitates art

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why Americans don't know what a woman is bros?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Because lefties have joined institutions, killed them, and wear their skins in order to seem legitimate.

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    does anyone know if there are Spanish subttles for this? i would love to watch this with my wife but she isnt very fluent in Bongistanish

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Duolingo is fricking free
      Make that b***h sign into the owl everyday.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        she onl cares about the music she likes and thats what she actually put time into understanding, everything else is just easymode. She has a full time job tho so i cant blame her for not wnting to spend a few hours every week.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      theres one scene with some spics

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      stfu paco

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm making a documentary called "Do Chickens Cry".

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      what's it about bro

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Chicken emotions and suicide

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I watched it yesterday when it was uploaded to youtube. It literally won't convince a single person one way or the other, but I do admit Walsh is an artful troll. I would have prefered a movie that played devil's advocate to both sides though, like asking the gender studies prof about how different cultures define women and how they contradict each other (cultural relativism) and asking the sane doctor how to best treat children who believe rightly or wrongly they have dysphoria.

    The part with the Masai tribe was based though.

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Agree with the other poster, it was bad journalism. You don't lead your subjects when you question them.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Bot

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I don't suck Trump's wiener so nope.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous
          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Interdasting that he didnt respond

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            kek the bot got caught

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >DDL
    Daniel Day-Lewis?

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I called the politician walking off the moment that segment started
    The other people are actually in trenched in their frick up beliefs that they'll argue for them even if they get stuck unable to answer.
    This old gay heemed and hawed when a valid issue was mentioned then bailed.
    He's only agreeing with this shit to stay elected.

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This shit hits hard on cringing at americans, I shit you not it's like watching borat for the first time.

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i watched it on youtube yesterday
    its pretty based ngl
    best scene where this completely moronic professor tried to explain what a woman is by saying that a woman is a woman
    and matt first asked
    1. do you know what circular reasoning is
    2. can you define woman without using the word woman
    lmao

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      man rustle used to be based
      then he started doing lesbo shit

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Didn't he have a degenerative condition? Is he blind yet?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          probably made it up

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    He interview jazz mutilator that Black person bower

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the brain is the person, if the brain sees itself as a woman then that's what that person is, it's not complicated

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      So what is a woman?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        a female

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          How can a brain see itself as female when it's clearly not?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Says who? This idea that a person is just a brain in a vat with no other external inputs from the body is a totally unexamined premise. Why am I supposed to just take it for granted that "a person is just a disembodied conciousness trust me lol"

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        who said there's no external inputs?
        different brains might absorb or ignore external inputs differently

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No jazz jennings interview 1/10

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    im in the process of writing, directing and starring in "What is A Incel" 2024

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    literally the only place on the internet obsessing over this lmao you guys actually pay them rent to live in your heads

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      nice projection freak

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >US embassies our gay flags everywhere
      >every corporation doing the gay flag thing
      >The White House denying funds to feed school children if they don't give into the moronic troony madness
      Yes, we're the ones that are obsessed.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >literally the only place on the internet that hasn't been shamed or threatened into silence

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, these horrific crimes are getting exposed and people are talking about it. Now cry some more.

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It also talks about john money.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money

    The ftm troon is disturbingly honest about how profitable troony surgery is and how dangerous it is.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      the ftm is broken and dying, she has nothing left to lose, glad she didn't double down and instead opted to speak out

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        She was so hot before she trooned out. She turned into balding fatso after living on easy mode.

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What is it about? The IMDb page only has the following:
    >It's the question you're not allowed to ask. The documentary they don't want you to see.

    Pardon if it was already answered, but I'm not reading any more of this seething mess of a thread.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's about a dude going around asking people what a woman is. People who are woke won't answer or fall apart.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I see. Thank you for the reply.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Some republican israelite interviews people (doctors, profs, troons,) involved in the trans industry, and it is an industry.
      Hormone blockers frick you up for life. Suicide rates go up after bottom surgery. Trans kids generate pharma profits. Download it and skip to one hour in.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The first hour is funny though.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, but the real shit starts at one hour. The first hour is funny, though.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Turns out the last third is also kinda funny.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >watching anime about some random wolf as a child
            >turned into wolf irl
            >my fricking sides
            kek frick you japan

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Revenge for WWII

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why the frick are you morons so obsessed with trannies? If you hate trannies, all you have to do is not read shit about them and they won't affect your life. Why are you going out of your way to watch some movie about them?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >>all you have to do is not read shit about them and they won't affect your life
      >My kids school will have to embrace troony shit or have funds cut.
      >I have to interact with several and use their "preferred pronouns" while I'm in law school.
      >People get fricking fired for not going along with troony delusions.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >dude btw im in law school, im so smart

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I'm sorry that the idea of someone you don't know being in law school makes you feel intellectually inferior.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            your need to shoehorn in your law school shows you feel intellectually superior to everyone

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I don't at all, I think you just have some weird feeling of inadequacy. Was the LSAT too hard for you or something? Did a lawyer frick your girlfriend? Either way, you've made up someone in your head and you're mad at them, not me.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I believe his point was that in law school, where you'd assume higher standards and real discussions of things, you don't actually have that. Frick lawyers btw.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            My point was that I'm encountering this shit in real life where it has effects. It was no deeper than that.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Fair. Lawyers are still stooges in my experience.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                No argument here.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >it has effects
              >OH NO I HAD TO USE SOMEONE'S "PREFERRED PRONOUNS" THIS IS MAKING MY LIFE SO HARD, FRICK TRANNIES

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Can you only make up enemies in your mind and not have an actual discussion? Is that fulfilling to you?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Why should I be forced to deny objective reality? Why am I being forced to go along with people's delusions?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Because the president talks about them and I have to see pride flags all over the place this month. It’s time to fight back

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You and every single piece of media make it about yourselves and now you're surprised people respond?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >all you have to do is not read shit about them and they won't affect your life.
      I haven't been able to engage with vidya in years without running into a troony. They are literally fricking everywhere. In the fanbases, as site moderators, in fan discords, on development teams, in game trailers, at award events, in advertisements. They are literally fricking EVERYWHERE and they do not fricking stop.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >playing video games as an adult

        you deserve worse

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Here's your xbox event bro

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Here's your expansion announcement bro

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Here's your speedrunning charity event bro

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Here's your E3 bro

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Here's your expansion announcement bro

          They literally look like demons

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Lol manchild can't play his video games

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >This argument again

    A human with XX chromosomes is a female.
    A human with XY chromosomes is a male.

    Shall you drug yourself and cut of your penis to transition from one to the other, your sex won't change, if you initially were a male you will keep being a male.

    Personally, I will use your pronouns out of respect if I have to interact with you, but shall someone call you a male nothing should happen as he/she is saying nothing but the truth. If it hurts, maybe you should reconsider your choices.

    Other than that, IT IS a mental ilness, as the OMS said until public pressure made them change the definition to a more woke one, and as such, it should be treated as a mental problem (and I'm mainly refering to all the brainwashed kids who go through these procedures).

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      People don't make the xy/xx argument because there are legitimately women with a y chromosome.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        a very very very rare genetic abnormality doesn't get to define the catagorys for the 99.999999999999999999% of the rest of us

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        And there are humans with 11 fingers because of an unnatural mutation. Should we say people have 11 fingers not just 10 like it’s the norm?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Nope, those ”women” can’t get pregnant. They can produce sperm tho.

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    your body selected to be formed as male in the womb

    yet somehow you aren't male?

  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    One of my favorite things about the doc was his little street interviews with groups of women. This is something you notice with at least 90% of women in public: if you ask them a question that's even remotely controversial, they'll look around at all the other women and collectively decide to say the thing they deem least offensive, regardless of their opinions. Notice how they sort of recoil and cringe at the fact they have to say they don't know how to define what a woman is. They don't actually believe it; they feel the need to pretend to so as to not lose social standing. This is how we got into this situation in the first place. That's also why apparently very liberal women always, ALWAYS have conservative partners. A woman can project everything she really thinks onto her boyfriend, who is confident enough to go against the grain and be called an butthole by her friends.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Women really, really like building peer consensus and sticking to it.

      - There are financial incentives for ANY kind of treatment, that does not mean it does not help people.
      - Not true, but better education is needed so people receive the best treatment
      - Nobody says it will cure depression, but it does improve quality of life, this has been documented
      - Voicing concerns to help people do not do this, not denying that trans people should be able to transition or arguing to limit availability of treatment do. Also, trans people are the most defenseless sexual minority, even in developed countries
      - Explaining complex topics is not dancing around a topic. Documentaries like this, and the conservative discourse in general want to oversimplify the topics knowing it is not possible, which allows them to say that their oversimplifications are absolute

      >Nobody says it will cure depression, but it does improve quality of life, this has been documented
      LOL yeah man a 40% ACK rate is a huge improvement on quality of life

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They need a leader. Thinking they can lead themself to a better and bigger life is a delusion of grandeur by itself

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >haha this is why liberal women have confident conservative partners like me, please like me liberal women i would bea good bf

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Cool insults, anon. Now what are you actual opinions on these controversial topics?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Not going to get too deep into this on an anonymous Chinese basket weaving forum, but anecdotally liberal chicks are some of the easiest lays of all time if they see you're willing to disagree with them politically. It's not about who's right or wrong: women like to see volition and independent thought from a man. It happens that in the current climate, being a conservative is out of style in coastal cities so it's edgy and attractive.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I kind of feel for them. They either play along or get labeled a TERF, which can be functionally life ruining at this point. These girls are required to show verbal/written agreeance whenever prompted, lest they be instantly outcast. Shit's like a hazing practice inside a dogma or a cult.

      Of course, some of them actually believe it too. But there are definitely those who don't and just play along. If you think Cinemaphile hates trannies, you should check out the other farm website that's populated mostly by females. Foids dunk on them harder than Cinemaphile moids ever could.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        This is the world they asked for, there is absolutely no reason to feel bad for them at all. Live by consensus, die by consensus.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        TERF forums are relentless with the troony hate. Sometimes I go to them for a good laugh. They've got the psychological profiling of random Reddit trannies down to a science.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Femcels are fricking hilarious, honestly. Well, so are incels. If they both just got over themselves and fixed their weird personality issues and unrealistic expectations, they'd be perfect for each other.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          wtf is a terf forum?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >That's also why apparently very liberal women always, ALWAYS have conservative partners

      My girlfriend was a deranged leftist when I met now, now she calls herself a "moderate" but still holds all the views her leftist friends have. Women.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The penis is a powerful tool for transmitting political beliefs, given enough time.

  45. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why the frick this homosexual ran away from the interview? I thought congressmen have the obligation to listen to the people, it doesn't matter how hot the kitchen get you are still getting that fat check from average's joe pocket, is this what America has come to?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He realized he didn't have the prepared statements necessary to not get him in hot water ready, stuttered out some generic trans talking points, and left the interview so he wouldn't say something he'd regret.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you can tell that this one is a closeted gay. is he an open gay?

  46. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Being young and impressionable I fell for the troony meme. I found one off Grindr. They were passable as much as one could believe. Their pictures made them look like a woman.

    The moment I met this person I could not have been more wrong. Their hands, forearms, shoulders, chest clavicle, thigh, and feet were unmistakenly male. The softness and the grace of what I expected from a woman just was not there. Their "girl voice" was a nice attempt but you could easily tell it was fake. This person had been transitioning for years and even after all that time, it was still just a dude in women's clothing.

    Fast forward to actually fricking her - there is truly nothing natural about this. Having to lube your wiener up so it fits in her ass is not natural. Forcing yourself in a hole that isn't meant to be fricked is on one hand pretty hot but on the other hand pretty sick. Not to mention the whole room smelled like ass and shit afterwards. I remember thinking I'd be greeted with a "feminine penis" - yeah it's nicely shaved, clean, and smaller than mine but after a round of fricking or when the makeup gets off the b***h you just see a straight up dude in front of you

    Disgusting experience, disgusting people. I have pity for the souls that did this to themselves. We failed you.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      lol

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Congrats on the gay, anon

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This is what you get when you fall for moronic posts on here that say shit like "escorts will never actually love you" and "escorts are all ugly" by people who have never actually tried to find a good escort.
      You could have been fricking this instead anon.
      If you just want to get laid and don't care how you do it, this is the best way.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Shallow and unfulfilling. Been there, done that.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Look, if you're looking for a deep relationship and emotionally fulfilling sex, it's not the way. But I'm an autistic anon who blew my shot at a normal life and I don't feel anything for women anyways, I know I'm not the only one. I wish I didn't fall for everything other people said about it and did it when I was still a lonely virgin.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            As cliché as it is, you really cannot love someone else until you can love yourself. I'm sorry for your struggles, anon. I hope you find more meaning and understanding of all things.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I get my fulfillment through work and hobbies. I'm satisfied. I know it's a coping mechanism but I'm old. I could fill myself with regret, or try and spend years going through the pain of tearing down all of my psychological protection and build myself up from the ground up, but what would be the point at this stage? All the best opportunities have passed me by and this is working.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                That's good to hear. Do what works for you and always be kind to others. Have a good weekend, anon.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I met an escort when I was traveling. Months later I saw this b***h on xvideos fricking with this guy called with Gaktrizzy. I wanted to kill myself. If you look him up, you'll know why.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I only go for the ones that say "no black gents".

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Are you surprised?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Considering he has videos of him fricking himself in the ass with his own wiener, barebacking trannies and men, and had (raw) sex with the same b***h I did, yeah I'm gonna say I'm pretty surprised.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >wow this prostitute that gets paid to have sex had sex with someone less than stellar
              You're a moron.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Is that a surprise? Do you know where you are?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you get what you deserve

  47. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    not a man in a dress, that's for sure

  48. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I hope one day the people preying on children and the mentally ill will be held accountable for what they have done

  49. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This is the most active thread I've ever posted on Cinemaphile. Thank you all for participating. My pronouns are arr/yarr.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      A pirate lives here.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      mine are bigus/dickus

  50. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I truly wish the best for trans people but honestly I feel like most of them are being duped into believing that they can become something that they're not. It runs completely counter to society's push for "accepting who you are". It's like getting dealt a pair of 7's in poker and saying it's a pair of aces and expecting others to pretend they're aces as well. I would legit become a women if I could but I cant. People need to accept who they are and not deny reality itself.

  51. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >what is a woman
    >literally 'womb man'
    Why nobody discuss this?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *