No way Brits were smart enough or strong enough to do it. No coincidence the the pyramids of Egypt are in Africa and another large stone structure outside of Africa was also built by blacks.
northern Europeans have 20% higher functional strength than subsaharan africans.
scientific fact.
every worlds strongest man top ten finalist for as long as the competition has run has been European, with the vast majority coming from north west Europe/scandinavia
>Literally does exactly what they accuse blacks of doing.
>Your eyes can lie.
They saw "sea monsters" for a split second, possibly while drunk as sailors like to be. The entirety of human history has viewed and accepts ethnic groups and races.
>It hasn't. It's totally discredited it and showed it to be purely memetic.
t. your ass.
Did you know that AI can detect what race someone is to a high degree of accuracy just by seeing an xray of their chest?
>As is claiming a species exist when it does not.
It very clearly does exist. Next you'll be arguing humans are actually koala's, one mammal the mammalian mammal.
>Correct. Just like me claiming a white child is a Bantu means he is a Bantu.
You're arguing against your own statement.
You haven't turned that child into a Bantu, so no he isn't a Bantu. That would require some serious gene editing so good luck with that.
You admitted the VW Beetle isn't a truck, because you said you would need to turn it into a truck for it to be a truck.
>Which you cannot define.
It's defined well enough for 99.9% of the world. You're the exception here.
>If I put a leash around my cat's neck and give it a backpack. It's transportation equipment.
So yet again you admit your cat isn't a transportation equipment, that it would need to be modified to turn into one.
>Blue can be measured and defined.
So can race and ethnicity.
>They saw "sea monsters" for a split second, possibly while drunk as sailors like to be.
Because eyes can and will lie.
>The entirety of human history has viewed and accepts ethnic groups and races.
The concept of race and ethnic groups are both about two centuries old. You would know this if you ever read a history book.
>t. your ass.
No. Actual scientists.
>Did you know that AI can detect what race someone is
It can't because race is not real. It's a fictional concept. It's like claiming AI can regonize what type of fairy somebody is.
>You haven't turned that child into a Bantu, so no he isn't a Bantu
I have taken the steps necesary for him to classify as a bantu. Which, since ethnic/racial/cultural groups are 100% memetic just means saying he's Bantu.
>because you said you would need to turn it into a truck for it to be a truck.
Correct.Much like you would need to turn a person into a bantu through the rigorous process of calling him a bantu.
>It's defined well enough for 99.9% of the world.
Correct. Unlike race, which most of the world doesn't even believe in.
>So yet again you admit your cat isn't a transportation equipment, that it would need to be modified to turn into one.
Yes. But, the steps are different. The steps needed to turn a car into a truck are different from the steps needed to turn a cat into transportation equipment. Much like the steps needed to turn a child Bantu are different from turning a Beetle into a truck. By which, of course, I mean the steps are "I claim they are a Bantu" because, again, totally memetic.
>So can race and ethnicity.
Nope. There is no genetic basis for the latter while the former can only be defined by using other memetic ideas.
>The concept of race and ethnic groups are both about two centuries old. You would know this if you ever read a history book.
Not true. You seriously want me to believe they thought that black guy was just like them? You're mentally ill.
>No. Actual scientists.
What's a scientist? Scientists don't exist. It's memetic.
>It can't because race is not real.
It can and has.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landig/article/PIIS2589-7500(22)00063-2/fulltext >AI can accurately predict self-reported race, even from corrupted, cropped, and noised medical images, often when clinical experts cannot
I'll accept a full concession now.
>I have taken the steps necesary for him to classify as a bantu.
You haven't edited his genes, so no.
Just because the classifications were decided by memetics doesn't mean the it wasn't based on reality.
>Correct.Much like you would need to turn a person into a bantu through the rigorous process of calling him a bantu.
That isn't the process needed to turn someone into a bantu. That also isn't what you said you'd need to do to a VW Beetle to turn it into a truck, you didn't just say "call it a truck", you said modify it which would involve basically just taking the engine and shoving it in a new chassis. I suppose for humans this would be a brain transplant on a newborn, but their brain still wouldn't be a bantus.
>Correct. Unlike race, which most of the world doesn't even believe in.
They do. In fact the only places pushing the "one race" bullshit are western and run by a cabal of parasites. They may accept other people into their country as citizens, but they will never be their race let alone their ethnic group.
>The steps needed to turn a car into a truck are different from the steps needed to turn a cat into transportation equipment. Much like the steps needed to turn a child Bantu are different from turning a Beetle into a truck. By which, of course, I mean the steps are "I claim they are a Bantu" because, again, totally memetic.
If they were all totally memetic then the steps would be the same.
>Nope.
You're just going "LALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU" at this point. Grow up.
Hey, why aren't you responding to the research about AI being able to detect race from an image even when clinical experts can't?
You aren't ignoring it because it completely disproves your point are you?
That's awfully unscientific of you.
no they were only around for great discoveries and inventions.
slavery happened during the night
seriously africans didn't participate in the advancement of humanity at all and were more involved in the slave trade than any european country
the thing is nobody will ever have the courage to say that in public out loud, by fear to be called a racist
The people you're afraid of? That's me and my buddies, I couldn't tell you how many nazis we've dealt with. You're right to hide because we both know what'll happen if you ever say what you think openly. Now go back to crying on an anime forum LMAO it's the only outlet you'll ever have
>seriously africans didn't participate in the advancement of humanity at all and were more involved in the slave trade than any european country >the thing is nobody will ever have the courage to say that in public out loud, by fear to be called a racist
speak for yourself. ive got the guys at my work going full nazi. It takes some serious ground work but its a lot of fun once its done. I can now talk at work like I do here
is that why they use the word nagger and send me anti israelite shit even after they go work somewhere else? everyone has a level of racism I am just good at finding it and expanding upon it
>is that why they use the word nagger and send me anti israelite shit even after they go work somewhere else?
Most likely, yes.
It's like playing with a cat by giving it threats and watching you pass out.
>everyone has a level of racism
Insofar that everybody is capable of ignorance and stupidity, sure.
2 months ago
Anonymous
you dont know how people work. you dont go out of your way to keep in touch with a man you wont see again if you hate them
its just pattern recognition not stupidity.
you are not bright
2 months ago
Anonymous
>you dont go out of your way to keep in touch with a man you wont see again if you hate them
When did I say they "hate" you? You are a plaything to them. They hardly view you as human, most likely.
>its just pattern recognition not stupidity.
It's stupidity or a mental illness.
2 months ago
Anonymous
yeah you are an idiot. im off to work where I will drop n bombs all day to the tune of laughs and zero repercussions
2 months ago
Anonymous
Feel free. The same people will happily laugh as you are hanged to death.
>Did you know the only people in the UK that were against slavery in the 1800's were non-white's >Only they against it and no one else >Also those "blacks enslaving their fellow blacks" in Africa were just whites disguised to sow confusion throughout history >All of England was black before the white Romans came after being expelled by the non-white Romans who made Rome a paradise until the white barbarians of the north invaded.
Yes. Also most Nazis were black, Himmler was black, he just did the Michael Jackson thing.
Hitler got the idea to hire black dudes after being impressed by Jesse Owens
Yeah, where are the great black geniuses of today if they were so prevalent in every era of human advancement? Are all the achievements from the last 2 millenia simply stolen from any number of hapless but also supposedly brilliant black inventors or scientists, lost and buried in the sands of time?
It doesn't need to be logically consistent for people to believe it. Pointing out the logical inconsistencies of black power/leftist movements is a waste of time. Their end goal is simply to perpetuate the idea "blacks built civilization and are the superior race" and its working.
>also any book telling that truth would be banned and the author arrested
I keep forgetting this site in 2023 is like 80% non-American UK Commonwealth freedomlets
>he thinks America's much better
Non-Americans don't have guaranteed freedom of speech.
Americans don't have guaranteed freedom after speech, though in this case the punishment doesn't necessarily come from the government. Punishment for speech is punishment for speech however.
Hell, take a look at this website, can't even say the nword on the cesspit of the internet anymore.
The fuck are you babbling about? You could never go into private establishments and say what you want. That's not what "freedom of speech" is. The freedom of speech implies exactly what I was responding to: not getting thrown in jail for writing a goddamned book.
>You could never go into private establishments and say what you want
You can't go into public and say what you want without private punishment.
Go viral as a "karen" and see how long it takes for you to get fired.
2 months ago
Anonymous
None of that has anything to do with the government throwing you in jail, numbnuts. It's alway been that way, minus the internet.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>the government
Can you read? >though in this case the punishment doesn't necessarily come from the government
Punishment doesn't have to come from the government to limit speech.
it's not, and you can and people have published such books in britain despite our otherwise absurd free speech laws
the only notable instance of holocaust denial being met by legal action was because of the author of a shit book denying it was called a denier retard by a reviewer, who he then sued, and lost the case because they proved in court that the holocaust happened and that him denying it makes him retarded and thus her words were not libellous
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2000/115.html
knock yourself out
though I had it the wrong way around, the woman said Irving was a denier that knowingly used false evidence and the evidence was indeed proven false to the tune of "this shit doesn't disprove the holocaust"
2 months ago
Anonymous
I asked you to provide their proof not to list the court case. Judging by the fact you aren't willing to defend your statement after saying it's easily searchable, you must've been lying.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>here's the source chud >3600 lines of text
Post source means post source, not >100 pages. If it was proven in court then post their proof.
But judging by your post you're backpedaling, so I doubt you will.
2 months ago
Anonymous
NTA but you could be the stupidest fucker I've ever seen on this website, and that's impressive. He posted a source retard, face it.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>he posted a source
He posted >100 pages of garbage with "dude trust me, the source is hidden in here". He wants to waste my time, I say no, you present the evidence or admit you're wrong.
If it's actually in there then surely he can find it and show it to the class.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>reading is a waste of time
you'd prefer an infographic? maybe a /misc/ screenshot?
2 months ago
Anonymous
Reading >100 pages looking for a source that may or may not be there is a waste of time, yes. It's an attempt to end the argument by forcing your opponent to leave for hours, even I actually do read the full 3600 lines the thread will be 404'd or some jannie will have banned me by then. No doubt you holocaust believers are furiously reporting every post.
Tell you what, you read Germar Rudolfs book the Chemistry of Auschwitz and get back to me.
>because they proved in court that the holocaust happened
Fabricated truths are still lies. It was maybe 300,000 and literally a nothing burger used by israelites to gain plot armor. Anyone going out of their way to disprove deniers is clearly an idiot or a israelite
Seriopusly though the holocaust carries an emotional baggage, unlike other historical events.
Yes sopme people would get upset if you said some ancient african kingdoms were created by whites, but it would not be holocaust denying upset.
i mean if we're going to completely disregard evidence and rewrite history the way we want it to be - transatlantic slavery wasnt even a thing, the holocaust didnt happen, Hitler was black and Ancient Aliens
But youre choosing to be upset. Personally i couldnt give a fuck about slavery and the holocaust because we know both these things didnt happen and also Black people built Stonehenge.
Anon, nobody needs a reason to fuck over whites. The ability for people to do a action means that action is inherently legitimatized through strength.
>Am I stupid or am I lying? Because it can't be both
Perfect summation of your idiocy.
"To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself. That was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word 'doublethink' involved the use of doublethink."
Another perfect summation of your idiocy. Imagine claiming you can’t be a liar and stupid at the same time, and then quoting 1984 to defend your point.
out of apefrica has been disproven, keep up with the times
oldest modern man remains were found in Greece, and date back 350k years.
subsaharan africans have 19% chimpanzee blood in them, and 0% neanderthal, setting them apart from the rest of the world.
subsaharan africans are genetically closer to chimpanzees than Europeans are to africans
yes it has. discredited and disproven.
this is old news, you should stay more up to date, keep with the times.
older remains have been found in southern china even, about 300k years old.
It hasn't. The first modern man evolved in Africa. We know this. They did not evolve in China.
>The steps needed to turn a car into a truck are different from the steps needed to turn a cat into transportation equipment. Much like the steps needed to turn a child Bantu are different from turning a Beetle into a truck. By which, of course, I mean the steps are "I claim they are a Bantu" because, again, totally memetic.
If they were all totally memetic then the steps would be the same.
>Nope.
You're just going "LALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU" at this point. Grow up.
>If they were all totally memetic then the steps would be the same.
Correct. They are all the same.
Me claiming to be French, Bantu, Turkish, Nigerian, White, Norwegian, Jersey, or Sicilian all requires the exact same step: Me saying I am.
>subsaharan africans have 19% chimpanzee blood in them
Anon, the total difference between all people in 0.4% The difference between a human and a rat is about 8%. You are, again, totally mental.
>he doesn't know
19% dna for subsaharan africans, stemming from 3 unidentified lower primates, which is NOT found in the rest of the planet.
2-10% neanderthal dna in all populations outside of subsaharan africans.
mathematics, simple mathematics.
It's not that i don't know, it's that it's total nonsense.
>mathematics, simple mathematics.
If you understand thoseyou would realize you are digging yourself into a incredibly deep hole.
2 months ago
Anonymous
cope, you can't hide from the truth forever.
it'll haunt you every single day.
19% chimpanzee and minus the 10% neanderthal that makes humans human.
sounds like 29% difference already.
a horse has more in common with a tomato.
you are not in good company, kill yourself and make your dad happy for once
2 months ago
Anonymous
>you are not in good company
I can see that, why don't you help me?
2 months ago
Anonymous
I am, drink bleach and embrace whatever hell you believe in
2 months ago
Anonymous
I meant by fucking off, not by telling me what you do with your day.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Do it, imagine never seeing the pain of regret every time your father looks at you. I know you can see it in his eyes.
2 months ago
Anonymous
You seem to think about my father a lot, will talking to him make you go away?
2 months ago
Anonymous
no you are just transparent. I know you are a weak, sniveling, coward. and no man could possibly look at you with any amount of pride. end it all and find peace
2 months ago
Anonymous
What can I do to make you go away? Will anything achieve this result?
2 months ago
Anonymous
you know what I want. I have made that clear, no?
2 months ago
Anonymous
Not really, you've just been going on about my father. What is it you want that will make you fuck off?
2 months ago
Anonymous
I will add stupid to the list as well.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Do so, you're still not telling me what you want.
2 months ago
Anonymous
I have done so multiple times. just scroll up. also have another nagger word, nagger
2 months ago
Anonymous
Fine, I will let you talk to my father, now can you go away?
>Get hit countless times by screeching woman >Public cheers >Retaliate ONCE and everyone will jump on you sjw-style
That is why keeping the target on a hold is the best option here
My ex abused me in public one time. She legit punched my face, broke my fingers, and just scratched me. No one helped me. Some laughed. Part of the reason why I'm broken.
find her and kick her teeth in while wearing a balaclava.
make sure you set up some kind of alibi first, and wear second hand clothes to do it, then throw them away far away from where you or she lives.
need to regain your fury
>Arthur
How the fuck do the English get off pretending he's a national hero? They are literally the evil barbarous horde that wants to burn down Camelot in that story.
Why is the original MMPR megazord so based?
You’d think since it was the 13th season or whatever in Japan that it would be creatively bankrupt at that point, but it is legit the coolest and best designed one.
I don’t want to turn this into power rangers autism, I don’t care if you like the train one, I’m just saying.
>>israelites are evil >>They stole your country from you >>And they have privilege, they only help themselves >>We outnumber them ten to one by the way
>white people are the minority >yet a large portion of those darker tone cultures have praised lighter skin as more beautiful long before making contact with white Europeans
This is what pissed me off. No one from Rome got past the Sahara and so wouldn't know those people existed. Only Northern Africans were integrated into Rome.
>North Africa was part of ancient Rome >North Africa is part of Africa >therefore Romans were Bantu, just like ancient Egyptians
UK government funds the promotion of this shit
there was one ethiopian roman solider in britain and it was such an odd thing that even a roman general who was born in north africa was shocked and thought it was a bad omen
>Cheddar mas has been disproved by actual genetic markers that point he had at worst olive skin (3%) and at most very pale skin (46%), creators of the bust literally say they just gave him that skin color just because >There's only a SINGLE account of a black legionaire in all history of Britannia >Only 250 black people accounted in the 1500s, out of a 7 million population at the time
They keep making shit up aren't they?
mas has been disproved by actual genetic markers that point he had at worst olive skin (3%) and at most very pale skin (46%), creators of the bust literally say they just gave him that skin color just because
I don't know where you get those numbers from.
>Cheddar mas has been disproved by actual genetic markers that point he had at worst olive skin (3%) and at most very pale skin (46%), creators of the bust literally say they just gave him that skin color just because
Wasn't he also found within walking distance from an era cemetery, meaning he was likely an outsider? Add that to the knowledge that you can in fact walk from africa to Europe (and probably to England too at the time) in 6-12 months, and a single persons existence doesn't mean shit.
No. Cheddar man was a typical WHG. They all lacked skin lightening alleles that are common in modern Europeans.
They were less related to Africans than modern Swedes, though. Today Balts have the most of their ancestry.
People like him lived in Europe before the neolithic.
b shows frequency of different alleles.
HERC2/OCA2 - blue eyes
SLCA425 and SLC45A2 lighter skin color
LCT - lactase tolerance
There's also comparison to frequency in modern populations.
CEU - Central Europe/Utah (whites)
GBR - Great Britain
IBS - Iberia
TSI - Tuscany
2 months ago
Anonymous
WHich means makes sense for him to be black if he's related to Iberia and Tuscany
2 months ago
Anonymous
He's not. You don't seem to understand. Those are relic populations.
He was a Western Hunter Gatherer (Oberkassel in my picture). These guys seem to came from the Balkans after the end of Last Glacial Maximum and repopulated Europe.
The other group survived in Iberia but they got fucked into extinction by the Balkan group.
At the same time different people (who were actually much lighter) lived in Russia, they spread to Scandinavia, Ukraine, Baltics and the Balkans mixing with the typical Western Hunter Gatherers. All those Eastern mutts had varying degrees of light skin alleles, but pure WHG (including Cheddar Man) had none.
That's the story. None of them were in any way related to blacks.
2 months ago
Anonymous
They're clearly Black retard, why are you people so against Black people's accomplishments? in fact in which way it affects you on your daily life what they did?
2 months ago
Anonymous
Black people are retroactively claiming accomplishments and history that doesnt belong them...because people were mean to them. Why would you support that? What if the Irish claimed that they colonized Brazil? Would you be against the accomplishments of the Irish?
2 months ago
Anonymous
You have been doing it for millennia and now you act like you care about history?
2 months ago
Anonymous
Im not methuselah I didn’t do shit. I’ve got the internet. Edison was a patent troll, Lewis and Clark had a brown lady sherpa and Columbus was a rapist. Im not my lack of melanin. Im not going to let a goth girl burn me to death for eating mushrooms because people that look kinda similar to us did that 400 years ago.
Take your weird cultural snuff porn somewhere else. Don’t lay the group identity hangups you have adopted as a way to cope with yourself being uninteresting as an individual somewhere else.
2 months ago
Anonymous
literally every human being in all of human history up to the last 60 years would've called you genuinely insane for this post. the last 60 years incidentally being the most self-destructive humanity has ever been, we're now at negative population growth due to hopelessness because of retarded posts like yours. your ideas represent the most malignant ideology that has ever been produced by humanity, whose only logical conclusion is suicide or slavery. and you're too dumb to even realize it, in spite of a lifetime worth of evidence. I guess outright denying reality is the only way it's possible to cope.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>literally every human being in all of human history up to the last 60 years would've called you genuinely insane for this post
1960? I think you overestimate yourself.
Either way, that's not a argument. For most of human history people believed that if they threw virgin girls into rivers it would stop them from flooding. It didn't.
> the last 60 years incidentally being the most self-destructive humanity has ever been
Read a history book.
>we're now at negative population growth
Oh god, at the current rate we'll go extinct at the rate of... Uh, never. Well, shit. So much for that argument.
>we're now at negative population growth
Damn. Worse than that one king who decided to massacre his entire population just because he could?
2 months ago
Anonymous
>post says I’m not my ancestors and I don’t support being subjected to the the same injustice or oppression that your ancestors faced just because you’ve chosen to think you’re some kind of incarnation of their collective suffering as a cope for not being a unique person
I seriously don’t think anyone on this website reads posts for comprehension anymore they just scan for keywords so that their brain can go with the preprogrammed response that aligns with whatever said keywords identify as the user’s ideological slant.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Why would you support that?
NTA but I find it funny. All nationalism/ethnic/race is like this. It's all laughably pathetic stolen valor nonsense. There is no practical difference to me between a modern British person claiming King Arthur and a modern Black person claiming they build Stonehenge.
>What if the Irish claimed that they colonized Brazil?
What do you mean "If"? People make retarded claims like all the time.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>People make retarded claims like all the time
What Bill the garbageman can get away saying in the pub after a few beers shouldn't be the same of what a Phd on History says on tv or the current academics are trying to push
2 months ago
Anonymous
>What Bill the garbageman can get away saying in the pub after a few beers shouldn't be the same of what a Phd on History says on tv or the current academics are trying to push
I agree. A shame that, both now and in the past, it was.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>I don't like my nation/ethnicity/race so therefor none if it is real. Culture no real, heritage no real, inheritance no real. It's all just make believe and we're on people the human people. >Obviously this means everything good you think is yours is actually mine too.
How convenient for you.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>I don't like my nation/ethnicity/race so therefor none if it is real.
? I like my country just fine. Race and ethnicity is still total memetic nonsense with zero bearing on reality and any attempt at nationalism or ethnic pride is just stolen valor by people with nothing personally to offer.
>Culture no real,
Define culture.
>heritage no real,
Correct. You are no more the people during whatever golden age your country had than you are a random Chinese peasant. In fact, in most cases, you are most likely to be closer to the latter.
>inheritance no real
I'm not exactly lugging around crap from six hundred years ago around my home.
>It's all just make believe
Yes.
>Obviously this means everything good you think is yours is actually mine too.
Everything belongs to everybody only insofar that they can defend and legitimatize their claim. Even if you want to argue a morale case for ownership exists, that does not change the reality that any actual enforcement of that ownership is based entirely on force. >and we're on people the human people.
Yes.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>I'm not exactly lugging around crap from six hundred years ago around my home.
you LITERALLY are. where do you think your home came from? you think it just sprung out of the earth, like from a magical garden? that god gave it to you? that the world was created yesterday?
2 months ago
Anonymous
>you LITERALLY are.
The fuck? You're telling me that when I was playing Dark Souls on my computer this morning, I was actually touching a six hundred year old computer?
>you think it just sprung out of the earth, like from a magical garden?
No, it was build by people post world war 2 and then renovated in the eighties.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Race and ethnicity is still total memetic nonsense with zero bearing on reality
When a White mother and White father can create a full blooded Bantu child, I'll believe you.
2 months ago
Anonymous
My son is dark skinned, you might even describe him as "Bantu" in looks complete with woolly hair. Yet my wife and I are both pale blonds- turns out she must have had some African American in her ancestry that lay dormant for generations but finally revealed itself in our son. At the end of the day, skin color is only skin deep.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Ha
2 months ago
Anonymous
anon, contact a lawyer, you have been tricked
2 months ago
Anonymous
I know this is probably a shitpost but knowing the cucks on this board there's a very real chance you're serious.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>turns out she must have had some African American in her
yeah no shit
2 months ago
Anonymous
>my wife's son
2 months ago
Anonymous
just goes to show that genetics are made up nonsense, and really anything can happen
2 months ago
Anonymous
some big cope there. Genuinely feel sorry for the people replying to you.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>no argument
Yawn.
>There is no such thing as a full blooded bantu child
And yet they won't even make a partial Bantu child, because they aren't Bantu themselves.
But congratulations on dodging the point, I accept your concession.
>And yet they won't even make a partial Bantu child
Partial? Is 99.6% not partial enough for you?
[...]
[...]
Weird how you can spot dishonesty from a person’s arguing style before you even know what side of the argument the person is on.
How convenient, that means you don't have to actually make a argument.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>How convenient, that means you don't have to actually make a argument.
I have no interest in taking a liar seriously.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Very convenient.
>Partial? Is 99.6% not partial enough for you?
Is the child Bantu? No? Then it isn't.
>Is the child Bantu
I declare it to be Bantu. Since the idea of being Bantu is 100% memetic. He is now a Bantu.
I win.
You’re Mexican, right?
Dutch.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>I declare it to be Bantu.
And you are wrong. Just because it's memetic doesn't mean it isn't real, the term is a classification for observable reality. Just because "truck" is an abstract term that encompasses a large variety of vehicles it doesn't mean that a VW Beetle (I'm referring to the Herbie-type) can be considered a truck. Then again you sound like the kind of person who'd say "One transportation equipment, the vehicle transportation equipment", right?
2 months ago
Anonymous
The mutt doesn't realize that socially constructed taxonomies can still be useful
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Partial? Is 99.6% not partial enough for you?
Is the child Bantu? No? Then it isn't.
2 months ago
Anonymous
You’re Mexican, right?
2 months ago
Anonymous
Brazilian mullato is my guess
2 months ago
Anonymous
It’s so obviously a israelite.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>babies come with the stork
why are all leftists at the developmental level of kindernagrdeners?
2 months ago
Anonymous
Babies come from people. Not heritage or culture.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Are you fucking joking? People come from people. Culture comes from people. People come from culture. It's all the same thing. Your culture is as much genetic as everything else about you. Literally ALL your mental and physical traits are genetically inherited. All your thoughts and ideas are genetically derived. Saying otherwise is like saying you can teach a dog to talk. Or a rock. You can't argue that you're NOT 100% your genes without arguing that you're no different from a rock. Do you really not understand where ANYTHING comes from? And that a dog can sit on your sofa as well as you can doesn't mean your dog can create a sofa. A sofa isn't just a thing that appeared out of nowhere. It took tens of thousands of years to get to a sofa. Your modern sofa, nobody but a modern european could've made, literally. Only they created the technologies necessary to build that sofa. That other people can emulate it afterwards is like saying that because you can understand relativity you came up with it. You're talking about fucking stolen valor, your whole series of posts is a huge appeal to stolen valor, FROM the europeans to everyone else. They have created EVERYTHING new for the last 400 years. Even inane cultura things like, oh, black people created this music or whatever, was only possible because of europeans, because euroepans created the technology that made it possible to make that music in the first place. Literally everything, dude. EVERYTHING. Your whole fucking premise is a massive revisionism of human history, motivated by I have no idea what. Some kind of pathetic attempt at feeling better about yourself for "knowing better"; you don't fucking know better. You're the midwit retard in the meme who thinks he's clever by being wronger than both the geniuses and the morons. I'm sick of you dumb shits. You know NOTHING ,and you're proud of it? Fucking disgusting.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Your culture is as much genetic as everything else about you.
Nonsense, it's memetic.
>Literally ALL your mental and physical traits are genetically inherited.
About 50-70% by modern scientific estimates.
>All your thoughts and ideas are genetically derived.
Meme theory correctly disagrees.
>Saying otherwise is like saying you can teach a dog to talk.
No, what you are doing is using pseudo scientific rhetoric to justify your believes. Your very questionable believes.
>You can't argue that you're NOT 100% your genes without arguing that you're no different from a rock.
You can, very easily in fact. Mostly because, and this part is going to be really hard for you to understand, but there is this thing called reality. Try cutting a rock, then try cutting yourself. See the difference in result.
>Do you really not understand where ANYTHING comes from?
Do you? Because clearly, you do not.
>Your modern sofa, nobody but a modern european could've made, literally.
You mean my modern sofa that was made in... let me check... India.
>Only they created the technologies necessary to build that sofa.
They didn't. In fact, non European countries had the means to build sofa's centuries before Europe.
>They have created EVERYTHING new for the last 400 years.
Yes. Before that they were a tiny backwater with no importance to the rest of teh world.
>Even inane cultura things like, oh, black people created this music or whatever, was only possible because of europeans
Oh yeah, because nobody had music before Europeans did.
>Literally everything, dude.
Literally nothing. If every European was exterminated 500 years ago, their entire culture and people wiped out. People would still have Sofa's, they would still have the instruments to play Jazz, and they would probably still have computers.
>Your whole fucking premise is a massive revisionism of human history,
No. You are just totally insane. Off your rockers crazy, to be frank.
2 months ago
Anonymous
You have done nothing here but show your willful ignorance
2 months ago
Anonymous
It must be brutal being this retarded yet determined.
2 months ago
Anonymous
It must be brutal to be totally mental.
>I declare it to be Bantu.
And you are wrong. Just because it's memetic doesn't mean it isn't real, the term is a classification for observable reality. Just because "truck" is an abstract term that encompasses a large variety of vehicles it doesn't mean that a VW Beetle (I'm referring to the Herbie-type) can be considered a truck. Then again you sound like the kind of person who'd say "One transportation equipment, the vehicle transportation equipment", right?
>Just because it's memetic doesn't mean it isn't real, the
Because it's memetic IT ISN'T real. If you want to argue it has it uses, and you can do that, then you should. But by it's nature as a meme it will never be a part of reality.
>Just because "truck" is an abstract term that encompasses a large variety of vehicles it doesn't mean that a VW Beetle (I'm referring to the Herbie-type) can be considered a truck
You can literally turn a VW Beetle into a truck. This is not a argument that you are going to win using that metaphor. Granted, you can't win it at all but you should at least try and use a better metaphor.
>Then again you sound like the kind of person who'd say "One transportation equipment, the vehicle transportation equipment", right?
You sound like the type of person who would claim something isn't transportation equipment just because it doesn't meet some arbitrary standard.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Unwrapping your ball of lies, half truths, underhanded maneuvers, stupidity and deceits is asking too much of any sane person. I assume you win most of your arguments through this tactic of lying so often nobody could bear to untangle your falsehoods. It’s easier just to call you a liar and a fag.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>is asking too much of any sane person
Not that you would know what it's like to be one.
>I assume you win most of your arguments
Correct.
> this tactic of lying so often nobody could bear to untangle your falsehoods.
Am I stupid or am I lying? Because it can't be both. Either I'm speaking from a position of genuine ignorance or I am lying.
Ever heard of doublethink?
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Am I stupid or am I lying? Because it can't be both
Perfect summation of your idiocy.
2 months ago
Anonymous
What exactly is mutually contradictory about being both stupid and a liar?
2 months ago
Anonymous
You can't be misinformed and lying about a singular thing. If i believe in something due to low intelligence, it is not a lie for me to say I believe in that thing. If I do not believe in a thing, but I claim I do so anyway, then it is a lie. It cannot be both a lie and a mistake.
If you want to claim I lie about somethings and are incorrect about others, that would be one thing. You don't, because you are mentally insane.
2 months ago
Anonymous
See what I mean? People like this are best exposed by not engaging in the original argument. They show themselves as utter fools when asked the simplest question.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>See what I mean
You are engaging in Doublethink, yes.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>you are mentally insane
You're the one claiming culture and genetics aren't real. Did you forget to take your meds this morning?
2 months ago
Anonymous
>You're the one claiming culture and genetics aren't real.
I am claiming culture is memetic (It is) and genetic disproves your ideas (It does).
You have failed to argue against either point.
let's do it.
how many need to hang before everyone else joins in
One. After that, they'll happily hang you.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Arguing with you is a waste of time, all you do is dance around in circles and spout non sequiturs.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Arguing with you is a waste of time
Likewise. You should be grateful I tried to civilize you nonetheless.
No way you still think this
I do.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>You should be grateful I tried to civilize you nonetheless. >can't string a single sentence together without glaring grammatical errors a child would be ashamed of
lel, but don't stop. Gotta have something to laugh at.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>can't string a single sentence together without glaring grammatical errors a child would be ashamed of
Pot calling the kettle black, much?
Imagine being Egyptian and having retarded subsaharan africans in America trying to claim your ancient leaders.
>Imagine being Egyptian
Imagine being Egyptian and having random ass Arabs claim they build the Pyramids.
Innocent men were tortured there.
No. Innocent men did the torture. Because torturing Nazis is not a crime.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Ancient Egyptians are most closely related to Arabs - Yemenis, Saudis.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Ancient Egyptians are most closely related to Arabs - Yemenis, Saudis. >Most closely
Might as well just say "not at all".
>but Arabs are closest.
They are only slightly more close than West Africans. Let alone, say, Ethiopia.
the only bergs being executed will have precious materials at the start of their names
>He doesn't know about Nuremberg
people like you never have the stomach for violence all us "nazis" are safe
You should read up how many times the Nazis got kicked in the balls by British soldiers.
2 months ago
Anonymous
and you dont have the fortitude to be a soldier, my point stands
2 months ago
Anonymous
>You should read up how many times the Nazis got kicked in the balls by British soldiers.
They weren't. It's a meme. There was a whole court case about these allegations. It's also not Nuremberg, but Dachau trials and it was about Malmedy massacre.
>the "kicked in the nuts" claims were misattributed to some American judge >he said that there was evidence that some were knocked in the balls, but the claim that "all but 2 were tortured" was inaccurate and not a statement he made
This doesn't exactly deboonk the idea that confessions were given under duress
2 months ago
Anonymous
A shame if true.
>They are only slightly more close than West Africans. Let alone, say, Ethiopia.
No, even Swedes would be closer to Egyptians than West Africans. Ethiopians also weren't that close. Horners have too much Nilotic ancestry.
>No, even Swedes would be closer to Egyptians than West Africans.
Nope. About as close.
> Orange != Apple because an apple is an apple. > Race doesn't exists because its just a 'fantasy' system humans have used to show quantifiable differences between each other.
By your same logic, the difference between an apple and an orange is a fantasy, because they're both fruits. > You can't show someone's racial makeup by DNA
So dumb.
>By your same logic, the difference between an apple and an orange is a fantasy, because they're both fruits.
No, because differences between fruits exist and can be understood. Racial differences cannot.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>They are only slightly more close than West Africans. Let alone, say, Ethiopia.
No, even Swedes would be closer to Egyptians than West Africans. Ethiopians also weren't that close. Horners have too much Nilotic ancestry.
2 months ago
Anonymous
people like you never have the stomach for violence all us "nazis" are safe
2 months ago
Anonymous
>No. Innocent men did the torture.
Innocent men don't torture others.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Others implies that nazis are people.
>Race is not real
And neither are not breeds, right?
>Not breeds
?
>as there are distinct species which can produce fertile hybrid offspring like zonkeys and ligers
Neither hybrid is fertile.
> DNA can't show racial makeup.
You're honestly a stupid person.
It can't because race is not real.
>look sinilar
not a definition, it is completely subjective of whether something looks similar to another.
there is no such thing as species. animals are a spectrum, and there are no clear distinctions between them.
prove a cat isn't a dog. go ahead, I'll wait
>not a definition,
Similar traits does not just mean they look similar. This is not subjective, you just fail at biology.
and you dont have the fortitude to be a soldier, my point stands
You don't need to be a soldier to kill pests.
cope, you can't hide from the truth forever.
it'll haunt you every single day.
19% chimpanzee and minus the 10% neanderthal that makes humans human.
sounds like 29% difference already.
a horse has more in common with a tomato.
The truth? Anon, the truth that you are ignoring is literally so fundamental to biology and modern genetics that by ignoring it you have shown how little you care for the truth.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Others implies that nazis are people.
Of course they're people, why wouldn't they be? Because you arbitrarily decided so?
2 months ago
Anonymous
> why wouldn't they be?
Because they do not act, think, or understand the world in the same way people do. In every possible measure in which humanity is defined, including their own, they fall outside of it.
Anon, why are you ignoring my science?
What science?
prove species exist, oh wait you can't
reminder that there is no such thing as species and it is a cultural concept.
most languages don't have words for different species, and some don't even have words at all.
some have the same word for dog as rabbit, because they are the same species.
Species is a very simple classification: Can it breed and produce fertile offspring?
There you go. Simple, clean, to the point. No question or doubt remaining. Unlike race, which is all doubt.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Species is a very simple classification: Can it breed and produce fertile offspring?
See
>a set of animals or plants in which the members have similar characteristics to each other and can breed with each other:
And thats an imperfect taxonomic classification, as there are distinct species which can produce fertile hybrid offspring like zonkeys and ligers
2 months ago
Anonymous
https://www.zonkey.co.uk/about/zonkey/#:~:text=If%20you%20have%20a%20male,in%20zoos%20around%20the%20world. >Sadly the Zonkey is a sterile creature
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liger#:~:text=Male%20ligers%20are%20consequently%20sterile,at%20the%20Munich%20Hellabrunn%20Zoo. >Male ligers are consequently sterile,
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Because they do not act, think, or understand the world in the same way people do.
According to who? You, their mortal enemy?
It sounds like you're just an angry israelite calling people he doesn't like subhuman. It sounds like you have a lot of growing up to do.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>According to who?
According to themselves.
Those that do not believe in humanity are not part of it.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>According to themselves.
Why do you israelites keep lying? You wouldn't be so hated if you didn't lie at every opportunity.
2 months ago
Anonymous
heeb
2 months ago
Anonymous
prove species exist, oh wait you can't
2 months ago
Anonymous
look at this kike go
2 months ago
Anonymous
No argument? Sad, very sad. But expected.
2 months ago
Anonymous
israelite
2 months ago
Anonymous
Very antisemitic of you. It’s not their fault they are genetically predisposed to schizophrenia.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Because it's memetic IT ISN'T real.
It's clearly real, your eyes can prove as much, genetic has proven it even further. Denying the species exists just because there's differences in the individual is as retarded as it gets.
>You can literally turn a VW Beetle into a truck.
So you admit a VW Beetle isn't a truck, because you would need to turn it into one. Thank you for admitting you're wrong.
>You sound like the type of person who would claim something isn't transportation equipment just because it doesn't meet some arbitrary standard.
You couldn't even come up with a metaphor lmao. Ironic considering your previous statement.
But yes, if something doesn't fit the definition then it isn't of that classification. No, your cat isn't transportation equipment (I don't mean those big trucks, I mean the furry thing).
You're obsessed by grey areas.
How about we go one better. You autists like colours don't you?
Is blue blue? Yes.
If we add 5% red is the new blue still blue? Yes.
If we continue this process is there a point at which it turns into purple and then red? Yes.
Does that mean "blue" doesn't exist? No.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>your eyes can prove as much,
People used to believe, genuinly believe, that sea monsters existed. In reality, they were whale dicks.
Your eyes can lie.
>genetic has proven it even further.
It hasn't. It's totally discredited it and showed it to be purely memetic.
>Denying the species exists just because there's differences in the individual is as retarded as it gets.
As is claiming a species exist when it does not.
>So you admit a VW Beetle isn't a truck, because you would need to turn it into one
Correct. Just like me claiming a white child is a Bantu means he is a Bantu.
>You couldn't even come up with a metaphor lmao
I have no need for a metaphor. That is literally what you are doing.
>But yes, if something doesn't fit the definition
Which you cannot define.
> No, your cat isn't transportation equipment
If I put a leash around my cat's neck and give it a backpack. It's transportation equipment.
>Does that mean "blue" doesn't exist?
Blue can be measured and defined.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Your eyes can lie.
They saw "sea monsters" for a split second, possibly while drunk as sailors like to be. The entirety of human history has viewed and accepts ethnic groups and races.
>It hasn't. It's totally discredited it and showed it to be purely memetic.
t. your ass.
Did you know that AI can detect what race someone is to a high degree of accuracy just by seeing an xray of their chest?
>As is claiming a species exist when it does not.
It very clearly does exist. Next you'll be arguing humans are actually koala's, one mammal the mammalian mammal.
>Correct. Just like me claiming a white child is a Bantu means he is a Bantu.
You're arguing against your own statement.
You haven't turned that child into a Bantu, so no he isn't a Bantu. That would require some serious gene editing so good luck with that.
You admitted the VW Beetle isn't a truck, because you said you would need to turn it into a truck for it to be a truck.
>Which you cannot define.
It's defined well enough for 99.9% of the world. You're the exception here.
>If I put a leash around my cat's neck and give it a backpack. It's transportation equipment.
So yet again you admit your cat isn't a transportation equipment, that it would need to be modified to turn into one.
>Blue can be measured and defined.
So can race and ethnicity.
2 months ago
Anonymous
How does one go through life with the severe mental retardation you're clearly suffering from?
2 months ago
Anonymous
The core of leftist philosophy is feels over reals. Even if most people don't understand the philosophical basis of the lefty principles they want to hold, it still boils down to this outlook. If everything is subjective and there is no greater objective truth (reals) then there can be nothing to prevent what they want to be true (feels) from being correct. That's why leftist thinking is so inherently attractive to people whether they know it or not. You can preform whatever mental gymnastics are necessary to ensure you're never forced to face reality.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>There is no practical difference to me between a modern British person claiming King Arthur and a modern Black person claiming they build Stonehenge.
Britain has a long standing cultural connection to the legend of King Arthur as well as an obvious geographic one. Sub Saharan Africans have literally no connection whatsoever, either genetic or cultural or geographic, to Stonehenge.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Britain has a long standing cultural connection to the legend of King Arthur >Cultural tradition
So, nothing.
>as well as an obvious geographic one
Camelot isn't even a real place, you dolt.
>Sub Saharan Africans have literally no connection whatsoever, either genetic or cultural or geographic, to Stonehenge.
The fact that they are currently in England gives them a equally strong connecting to Stonehenge as any modern British person has to King Arthur.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>literally every human being in all of human history up to the last 60 years would've called you genuinely insane for this post
1960? I think you overestimate yourself.
Either way, that's not a argument. For most of human history people believed that if they threw virgin girls into rivers it would stop them from flooding. It didn't.
> the last 60 years incidentally being the most self-destructive humanity has ever been
Read a history book.
>we're now at negative population growth
Oh god, at the current rate we'll go extinct at the rate of... Uh, never. Well, shit. So much for that argument.
>we're now at negative population growth
Damn. Worse than that one king who decided to massacre his entire population just because he could?
>I don't like my nation/ethnicity/race so therefor none if it is real.
? I like my country just fine. Race and ethnicity is still total memetic nonsense with zero bearing on reality and any attempt at nationalism or ethnic pride is just stolen valor by people with nothing personally to offer.
>Culture no real,
Define culture.
>heritage no real,
Correct. You are no more the people during whatever golden age your country had than you are a random Chinese peasant. In fact, in most cases, you are most likely to be closer to the latter.
>inheritance no real
I'm not exactly lugging around crap from six hundred years ago around my home.
>It's all just make believe
Yes.
>Obviously this means everything good you think is yours is actually mine too.
Everything belongs to everybody only insofar that they can defend and legitimatize their claim. Even if you want to argue a morale case for ownership exists, that does not change the reality that any actual enforcement of that ownership is based entirely on force. >and we're on people the human people.
Yes.
Weird how you can spot dishonesty from a person’s arguing style before you even know what side of the argument the person is on.
2 months ago
Anonymous
/leftypol/ trannies pass around "how to argue" documentation, so they all follow the same script.
it's more or less based on communist propaganda techniques and results in either avoiding the topic completely or picking on one tiny detail until everything else is forgotten.
other than that, it's outright lying, demanding absolute proof for something otherwise incredibly obvious, or deluging the discussion with links to irrelevant information so as to waste time and exhaust.
none of it is based on logic truth, or reasoning.
2 months ago
Anonymous
They are forced to, their mudhutter ancestors were enslaved and sold off by actual black kingdoms. Now they need to claim britain/america/europe/west were always black. It's to justify their existence here/make a place for them.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Anon, the fact they were enslaved is enough of a reason to justify their existence and place here. By all rights they should be demanding you kneel and prostrate before them at all times.
2 months ago
Anonymous
It is rather interesting that all the other continents somewhat individually developed their own cultures, societies, accomplishments etc. Yet, while all of this was going on, Africa really didnt do much. Fast forward a few 1000 years, and Africans claim they were part of and invented everything.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Yet, while all of this was going on, Africa really didnt do much.
It did. You are just extremely ignorant and comparing the most isolated parts of Africa where nobody lived to the rest of the world. It's like comparing Egypt with Eskimos living in North Finnand and concluding "Clearly, all Europeans are ignorant and backwards".
disingenuous kikery at play again
it continues: > - but did have dozens of other genes related to pale skin which I'll conveniently ignore. also lived in a place where there had been ice ages for hundreds of thousands of years, and is directly related to remains found in Europe from 350,000 years ago. I don't know how evolution works, don't know about genetics but if I repeat alleles enough times someone will believe me and that's all the jdf want from me. mission accomplished
Most of what you wrote is just a fantasy. You don't know much about prehistory.
The first West Eurasians (not even closely related to WHG) showed up in Europe after 40,000 BP (Aurignacians). First WHG show up in our record around 17,000 BP in Italy.
No one lived in Britain during the Last Glacial Maximum. This region was repopulated from the South, originally apparently by people related to the Fournol cluster (Aurignacians/Magdalenians/Solutreans), but they got later replaced by the Oberkassel cluster (Cheddar man - WHG).
>350,000 years ago
Most likely unrelated to any later Homo sapiens. It doesn't matter because we will probably never get its DNA.
The two Tudor era servants mentioned in the song weren't black either. They were Spanish Moors serving Catherine of Aragon. They're promoting the lie that North Africans were the same as Sub Saharan Bantus.
the first LIE is the only thing people remember.
this was disproven by the scientists who analysed the genetic material in the first place within days of the pair of israelite in the netherlands releasing their propaganda piece.
note that the ones making the sculpture had nothing to do with the genetic research, and simply linked their thing with it based on LIES.
doesnt matter how many times it is refuted though, because morons only believe the first lie they hear.
the kikey shits repeat it endlessly, and the sensationalist rubbish is passed around by fools and idiots.
>Gauls and Celts didn't count as civilization
1: Gauls were Celts. 2: Gauls were just Celts that lived in France. 3: No.
>Race and ethnicity is still total memetic nonsense with zero bearing on reality
When a White mother and White father can create a full blooded Bantu child, I'll believe you.
>When a White mother and White father can create a full blooded Bantu child
There is no such thing as a full blooded bantu child because there are no bantu genes or even Bantu genetic patterns.
>There is no such thing as a full blooded bantu child
And yet they won't even make a partial Bantu child, because they aren't Bantu themselves.
But congratulations on dodging the point, I accept your concession.
The Gauls came first seeing how they had to cross the ocean to get to the British Isles.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Again, Gauls are literally just Celts living in what is now known as France.
[...] >full blooded
There arent that many people left who are truly of a pure bloodline. Most people are some percentage mixed, and as time goes on more and more mixed.
>There arent that many people left who are truly of a pure bloodline.
Let me correct that for you:
There are zero.
2 months ago
Anonymous
It's the other way around. Celts came to Britain from France.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Correct. But they stopped being Gauls the moment they moved into Britain.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Im from Missouri, if I move to Texas do I stop being from Missouri?
2 months ago
Anonymous
Yes.
You have done nothing here but show your willful ignorance
You have done nothing but show your complete insanity.
2 months ago
Anonymous
There you go again. Good luck in life bud, you're going to need it
2 months ago
Anonymous
I would say the same. But, no, you are beyond help.
The mutt doesn't realize that socially constructed taxonomies can still be useful
Useful? to be sure. Rooted in reality? possibly. Reflective of material reality? No.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Rooted in reality? possibly. Reflective of material reality? No.
What's the difference between reality and "material reality".
2 months ago
Anonymous
NTA but xir will need a few minutes to get an appropriate answer from xir's discord server
>Race and ethnicity is still total memetic nonsense with zero bearing on reality
When a White mother and White father can create a full blooded Bantu child, I'll believe you.
>full blooded
There arent that many people left who are truly of a pure bloodline. Most people are some percentage mixed, and as time goes on more and more mixed.
2 months ago
Anonymous
How does this change my point? Why are you being autistic?
Race and ethnicity aren't accidents, they're products of sex between people (not like you'd know what that's like).
2 months ago
Anonymous
there's no such thing as species.
a tree is just the same as a jellyfish.
wolves and ants go hand in hand.
subsaharan negroids separated by half a million years of evolution are the same as thoroughbred northern European demigods.
you can't tell a great dane from a scottish terrier just by looking.
Ethiopians are the true inheritors of israel and should all be given passports immediately. >only one of these statements is true
2 months ago
Anonymous
>there's no such thing as species.
Sure there is. Not race though.
2 months ago
Anonymous
no, define species. where exactly does one end and the next begin?
it's a made up term for a non existent concept
israelites running it, and then art students fresh out of university doing the rest, with 50% of them being third world diversity quota filling elements, and a large part being trannies, dykes and feminists that have been taught to 'rebel'.
any with the slightest doubts flashing across their eyes while doing it will either have a sudden fear that they'll be called a "ray-ziz" and lose their job, or that they are committing a sin by questioning it.
it's the emperor's new clothes behaviour control technique; people are more afraid of being labelled a non-believer than stating a simple truth
Where I live, Czech Republic, one would e.g. say "on the place TODAY called Britain, a thousand of years ago Stonehenge was built"
I have noticed that it is common to say Brits are people living in Britain and Britain is simply a piece of land disconnected from history. So the Island is "Britain" today, during Romans and a tens of thousands years before, and the people living there are Brits today, during Romans and tens of thousands years before. I find that very strange way and when framed like this, indeed anyone is a migrants. The framing itself is stupid.
Here, nobody would ever say the Neolitic cultures that are being uncovered are the Czechs, simply because they are being uncovered within the borders of what is TODAY Czech Republic. Those were entirely different people.
Yes, but even "respective" newspapers, would frame it as if Cheddar Man being black, somehow means the blacks of today "have always been here", even though. I have seen children of first gen immigrants saying "we have always been part of Britain".
if you want another word to find strange, realise that "migrant" is newspeak that was pushed in 2015 by all the media simultaneously to remove the distinction of immigrant or emigrant, so there is no claim to a direction of travel or homeland.
it spread on here just as fast because the vast majority of people have no clue what they are saying, and can't remember anything beyond six months ago.
"migrate" is something birds do every winter/summer as they go back and forth.
"immigrants" despite being a factual term for someone entering your country, quickly gained a negative connotation as the word was most often seen in news articles about crime - tape, murder, robbery and so on.
I dont agree with everything that Graham Hancock claims...but the general idea that "Atlanteans" did exist is pretty reasonable. Stonehenge, Pyramids, etc are from this older more advanced group that disappeared...aka Atlanteans.
Whites are hated for being popular or beautiful and rich basically.
If you are poor and ugly they don't care so ultimately I think this is just about power hunger which is sad for the soul
There is no "fixing" England. The problem with England is that there is no release. They want, no, need the harsh hand of judgement to utterly destroy their country. But, it won't happen. They continue to walk along, waiting for a end that never comes. For justice that will never be felt. In a way, it is far worse.
>WE WUZ DRUIDS N SHEIT
Reminder that euros conquered half the world and forced an end to chattel slavery that had been practiced there since prehistory. Had it not been for european colonization, those people would have never stopped enslaving each other. Somehow this has been twisted into "wypipol are responsible for slavery and must pay forever".
There are verified historical instances of Black people throughout British history, such as in the film Belle, starring Gugu Mbatha-Raw and Sarah Gadon.
Where do you think this communist revision of history will ultimately end when entitled 80 iq spawn of the brown imports look at ancient European statues and see nothing but white?
>when entitled 80 iq spawn of the brown imports look at ancient European statues and see nothing but white?
Did you forget the george floyd riots?
Did you know they were global?
Did you know destruction of statues was global too?
I remember hearing about a famous one in England, apparently a very rich man basically built one of their cities and he fought against slavery. Got his statue pulled down anyway.
oldfags will remember when "WE WUZ KANGZ" was a joke based on a tiny frothing at the mouth gorilla cult in the US.
that is evil must be completely destroyed the moment it pops its head up, not left to fester.
Britain needs to be destroyed. It's too far gone. Can only hope they get dragged so far into the Ukraine conflict that they get obliterated by nuclear strikes.
I don't know why you're arguing with someone who denies racial/special reality. DNA can, and has in the past, been able to show someone's racial makeup and can even right now approximate an image of the person through DNA.
And I do think the error people are having here is that they're accepting a position of words being material when they aren't. We could call "race" apples right now, but it wouldn't alter the reality. I also think people are afraid to concede that humans aren't exempt from physiological genetic manifestations, as though we're so special.
tl;dr stop even arguing with someone so far gone because all you'll get is tennis between metaphysical and material remarks
Race is not real. You argue because you know this and can't win.
>DNA can, and has in the past, been able to show someone's racial makeu
It cannot.
>And I do think the error people are having here is that they're accepting a position of words being material when they aren't.
Incorrect. This is not a matter of words. There is no such thing as race. It's a total fantasy. You could call a apple a orange and it would still be a apple. You could call race a spade and it still wouldn't be real.
no, define species. where exactly does one end and the next begin?
it's a made up term for a non existent concept
>no, define species.
a set of animals or plants in which the members have similar characteristics to each other and can breed with each other:
>a set of animals or plants in which the members have similar characteristics to each other and can breed with each other:
And thats an imperfect taxonomic classification, as there are distinct species which can produce fertile hybrid offspring like zonkeys and ligers
>look sinilar
not a definition, it is completely subjective of whether something looks similar to another.
there is no such thing as species. animals are a spectrum, and there are no clear distinctions between them.
prove a cat isn't a dog. go ahead, I'll wait
Why can't a definition be subjective?
What is "flat"? Is it flat if it's a little bumpy? Is it flat if it's curved but perfectly smooth? Since perfect flatness is impossible does that mean nothing is flat?
No, I don't agree. Species do exist even if it's somewhat subjective. A grey area existing doesn't mean the black and White don't exist.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>No, I don't agree. Species do exist even if it's somewhat subjective. A grey area existing doesn't mean the black and White don't exist
so what you are saying is that whites and blacks are different species.
glad that's settled.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>so what you are saying is that whites and blacks are different species.
Yes.
I'm not the original guy you were arguing with, I started with >Why can't a definition be subjective?
2 months ago
Anonymous
that wasn't very useful then.
delete your last post so all future readers for generations to come read it as being the same poster
> Orange != Apple because an apple is an apple. > Race doesn't exists because its just a 'fantasy' system humans have used to show quantifiable differences between each other.
By your same logic, the difference between an apple and an orange is a fantasy, because they're both fruits. > You can't show someone's racial makeup by DNA
So dumb.
Education prior to 2016: > Black people invented peanut butter. > Chinamen invented fireworks. > White people invented everything else.
Post-2016: > Black women put a white man on the moon. > Black people ruled Egypt > Black people were members of the European aristocracy. > Black people built Stonehenge. > Black people invented video games. > The US was founded when the first black people landed.
it's because they found out that peanut butter had been around for tens of thousands of years in south america, which is where peanuts came from in the first place.
then they chimped out and started laying claim to everything else.
i prefer it in the 60s when they were still having tea parties in zoos for public amusement, and nothing else.
>The concept of race and ethnic groups are both about two centuries old. You would know this if you ever read a history book.
Not true. You seriously want me to believe they thought that black guy was just like them? You're mentally ill.
>No. Actual scientists.
What's a scientist? Scientists don't exist. It's memetic.
>It can't because race is not real.
It can and has.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landig/article/PIIS2589-7500(22)00063-2/fulltext >AI can accurately predict self-reported race, even from corrupted, cropped, and noised medical images, often when clinical experts cannot
I'll accept a full concession now.
>I have taken the steps necesary for him to classify as a bantu.
You haven't edited his genes, so no.
Just because the classifications were decided by memetics doesn't mean the it wasn't based on reality.
>Correct.Much like you would need to turn a person into a bantu through the rigorous process of calling him a bantu.
That isn't the process needed to turn someone into a bantu. That also isn't what you said you'd need to do to a VW Beetle to turn it into a truck, you didn't just say "call it a truck", you said modify it which would involve basically just taking the engine and shoving it in a new chassis. I suppose for humans this would be a brain transplant on a newborn, but their brain still wouldn't be a bantus.
>Correct. Unlike race, which most of the world doesn't even believe in.
They do. In fact the only places pushing the "one race" bullshit are western and run by a cabal of parasites. They may accept other people into their country as citizens, but they will never be their race let alone their ethnic group.
>You seriously want me to believe they thought that black guy was just like them
Discrimination happened, but it was not racial or ethnic because neither existed yet.
>What's a scientist?
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/scientist
>It can and has.
it can accurately predict self-reported race, according to this article. Which does not mean that race is real for the same reason that, say, if somebody claims they were a fairy they were not actually a fairy.
You literally don't even understand what a self learning AI is.
Or are you going to claim somebody self reporting as a woman is actually a woman now?
>You haven't edited his genes, so no.
There are no bantu genes. There are no genetic patterns tied to being a Bantu. Therefore, nothing has to be edited. It is purely memetic.
>That isn't the process needed to turn someone into a bantu.
It is. Because there is zero genetic link tied to the purely memetic idea of being a bantu.
>They do.
They do not. It is a purely western idea that has been mostly discredited and was never accepted by most of the world.
>but they will never be their race let alone their ethnic group.
They have no concept of race. Therefore it's a non issue.
>this implies that there is more than one truth.
You are forgetting the other possibility: Both are wrong.
>How did they know who to discriminate against?
Language, religion, just not being as rich and strong as them, legal status. Plenty of ways.
>they're defined in a dictionary
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/fairy
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/god
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/demon
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/elf
>If it doesn't exist yet is accurately predicted, does it just read the patients mind?
You literally don't understand what a predictive AI actually does, right?
>How can it tell what race the patient is if the race doesn't exist?
Because people feed it information and it uses that information to make decisions.
>the other person is also predicting their own race and funnily enough they both come to the same conclusion about 90% of the time
Which means nothing because it's based on a idea that is not real.
>I can guarantee I know more than you do on the subject.
Clearly you do not. You literally don't even understand the fundamental means by which it works.
>He would be identified as a man.
The AI would identify them as a women if it was input the right information.
>Of course there are.
No, there aren't. Which I know because you will, without fail, not mention any of them.
>Why do you keep lying so blatantly?
I am not, you are just mentally ill.
>Then why did you say you had to take physical steps to turn your cat into transportation equipment?
Because that is not memetic, therefore it requires actual physical steps.
>Language, religion, just not being as rich and strong as them, legal status. Plenty of ways.
Yeah, no.
>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/fairy >https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/god >https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/demon >https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/elf
So you admit that if something meets those definitions they are those things?
Thanks for admitting race and ethnicity is real.
>You literally don't understand what a predictive AI actually does, right?
I do, you however don't.
>Because people feed it information and it uses that information to make decisions.
During training, sure. There's clearly a correlation if it's that accurate after training.
>Which means nothing because it's based on a idea that is not real.
And yet it can predict it with >90% accuracy.
>The AI would identify them as a women if it was input the right information.
The mentally ill input wrong information, he would be detected as a man.
>I am not, you are just mentally ill.
t. mentally ill man who won't stop lying.
>Because that is not memetic, therefore it requires actual physical steps.
Of course it's memetic. It's an arbitrary characterization, just like race and ethnicity. But that characterization references something real.
>Discrimination happened, but it was not racial or ethnic
How did they know who to discriminate against?
>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/scientist
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/ethnicity
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/race (scroll down a bit).
They're defined in a dictionary, yet you say they don't exist.
>it can accurately predict self-reported race, according to this article. Which does not mean that race is real for the same reason that, say, if somebody claims they were a fairy they were not actually a fairy.
If it doesn't exist yet is accurately predicted, does it just read the patients mind? How can it tell what race the patient is if the race doesn't exist? It predicts it by observing small differences, the other person is also predicting their own race and funnily enough they both come to the same conclusion about 90% of the time - even when clinical experts aren't able to.
>You literally don't even understand what a self learning AI is.
I can guarantee I know more than you do on the subject.
>Or are you going to claim somebody self reporting as a woman is actually a woman now?
He would be identified as a man.
>There are no bantu genes. There are no genetic patterns tied to being a Bantu.
Of course there are.
>They do not. It is a purely western idea that has been mostly discredited and was never accepted by most of the world.
Why do you keep lying so blatantly?
>Correct. They are all the same.
Then why did you say you had to take physical steps to turn your cat into transportation equipment? If it was all memetic then you would've said "My cat is now a transportation equipment because I say so". But you didn't say that. You admitted that a transportation equipment has certain qualities that need to be met, despite "transportation equipment" being a made up concept.
reminder that there is no such thing as species and it is a cultural concept.
most languages don't have words for different species, and some don't even have words at all.
some have the same word for dog as rabbit, because they are the same species.
No way Brits were smart enough or strong enough to do it. No coincidence the the pyramids of Egypt are in Africa and another large stone structure outside of Africa was also built by blacks.
northern Europeans have 20% higher functional strength than subsaharan africans.
scientific fact.
every worlds strongest man top ten finalist for as long as the competition has run has been European, with the vast majority coming from north west Europe/scandinavia
those were whites/arabs that built and designed the pyramids. Blacks were designated dick washers/suckers.
>Literally does exactly what they accuse blacks of doing.
>They saw "sea monsters" for a split second, possibly while drunk as sailors like to be.
Because eyes can and will lie.
>The entirety of human history has viewed and accepts ethnic groups and races.
The concept of race and ethnic groups are both about two centuries old. You would know this if you ever read a history book.
>t. your ass.
No. Actual scientists.
>Did you know that AI can detect what race someone is
It can't because race is not real. It's a fictional concept. It's like claiming AI can regonize what type of fairy somebody is.
>You haven't turned that child into a Bantu, so no he isn't a Bantu
I have taken the steps necesary for him to classify as a bantu. Which, since ethnic/racial/cultural groups are 100% memetic just means saying he's Bantu.
>because you said you would need to turn it into a truck for it to be a truck.
Correct.Much like you would need to turn a person into a bantu through the rigorous process of calling him a bantu.
>It's defined well enough for 99.9% of the world.
Correct. Unlike race, which most of the world doesn't even believe in.
>So yet again you admit your cat isn't a transportation equipment, that it would need to be modified to turn into one.
Yes. But, the steps are different. The steps needed to turn a car into a truck are different from the steps needed to turn a cat into transportation equipment. Much like the steps needed to turn a child Bantu are different from turning a Beetle into a truck. By which, of course, I mean the steps are "I claim they are a Bantu" because, again, totally memetic.
>So can race and ethnicity.
Nope. There is no genetic basis for the latter while the former can only be defined by using other memetic ideas.
>The concept of race and ethnic groups are both about two centuries old. You would know this if you ever read a history book.
Not true. You seriously want me to believe they thought that black guy was just like them? You're mentally ill.
>No. Actual scientists.
What's a scientist? Scientists don't exist. It's memetic.
>It can't because race is not real.
It can and has.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landig/article/PIIS2589-7500(22)00063-2/fulltext
>AI can accurately predict self-reported race, even from corrupted, cropped, and noised medical images, often when clinical experts cannot
I'll accept a full concession now.
>I have taken the steps necesary for him to classify as a bantu.
You haven't edited his genes, so no.
Just because the classifications were decided by memetics doesn't mean the it wasn't based on reality.
>Correct.Much like you would need to turn a person into a bantu through the rigorous process of calling him a bantu.
That isn't the process needed to turn someone into a bantu. That also isn't what you said you'd need to do to a VW Beetle to turn it into a truck, you didn't just say "call it a truck", you said modify it which would involve basically just taking the engine and shoving it in a new chassis. I suppose for humans this would be a brain transplant on a newborn, but their brain still wouldn't be a bantus.
>Correct. Unlike race, which most of the world doesn't even believe in.
They do. In fact the only places pushing the "one race" bullshit are western and run by a cabal of parasites. They may accept other people into their country as citizens, but they will never be their race let alone their ethnic group.
>The steps needed to turn a car into a truck are different from the steps needed to turn a cat into transportation equipment. Much like the steps needed to turn a child Bantu are different from turning a Beetle into a truck. By which, of course, I mean the steps are "I claim they are a Bantu" because, again, totally memetic.
If they were all totally memetic then the steps would be the same.
>Nope.
You're just going "LALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU" at this point. Grow up.
Hey, why aren't you responding to the research about AI being able to detect race from an image even when clinical experts can't?
You aren't ignoring it because it completely disproves your point are you?
That's awfully unscientific of you.
Anon, why are you ignoring my science?
stonehenge was built by ancient dryads and their forest golems
why do I always forget Stonehenge isn't on easter island?
point is early humans liked to play with rocks
Easter Island was made by subsaharan africans
If black people were always present for every moment of British history, did they also carry out slavery and colonialism?
Slavey wasnt a thing. Its a complete hoax
Considering More blacks were enslaved by other blacks than were enslaved by whites, yes.
Nope. Did everything good. Nothing bad.
no they were only around for great discoveries and inventions.
slavery happened during the night
seriously africans didn't participate in the advancement of humanity at all and were more involved in the slave trade than any european country
the thing is nobody will ever have the courage to say that in public out loud, by fear to be called a racist
Imagine being too afraid to openly state your beliefs lol chuds are so spineless no wonder you guys keep losing
some of us have jobs and rent to pay
a neet wouldn't know, do you even meet people?
The people you're afraid of? That's me and my buddies, I couldn't tell you how many nazis we've dealt with. You're right to hide because we both know what'll happen if you ever say what you think openly. Now go back to crying on an anime forum LMAO it's the only outlet you'll ever have
>seriously africans didn't participate in the advancement of humanity at all and were more involved in the slave trade than any european country
>the thing is nobody will ever have the courage to say that in public out loud, by fear to be called a racist
speak for yourself. ive got the guys at my work going full nazi. It takes some serious ground work but its a lot of fun once its done. I can now talk at work like I do here
They are most likely just humoring you and making fun of you behind your back.
is that why they use the word nagger and send me anti israelite shit even after they go work somewhere else? everyone has a level of racism I am just good at finding it and expanding upon it
>is that why they use the word nagger and send me anti israelite shit even after they go work somewhere else?
Most likely, yes.
It's like playing with a cat by giving it threats and watching you pass out.
>everyone has a level of racism
Insofar that everybody is capable of ignorance and stupidity, sure.
you dont know how people work. you dont go out of your way to keep in touch with a man you wont see again if you hate them
its just pattern recognition not stupidity.
you are not bright
>you dont go out of your way to keep in touch with a man you wont see again if you hate them
When did I say they "hate" you? You are a plaything to them. They hardly view you as human, most likely.
>its just pattern recognition not stupidity.
It's stupidity or a mental illness.
yeah you are an idiot. im off to work where I will drop n bombs all day to the tune of laughs and zero repercussions
Feel free. The same people will happily laugh as you are hanged to death.
to be fair, I say that stuff out loud all the fucking time, and people agree with me
then again, I live in Spain
I mean some black dude had the bright idea to fuck a Neanderthal and move to the Fertile Crescent. We should give them props for that.
>Did you know the only people in the UK that were against slavery in the 1800's were non-white's
>Only they against it and no one else
>Also those "blacks enslaving their fellow blacks" in Africa were just whites disguised to sow confusion throughout history
>All of England was black before the white Romans came after being expelled by the non-white Romans who made Rome a paradise until the white barbarians of the north invaded.
They literally are responsible for black slavery
According to the same type of people as in OPs post, no. Slavery was invented in American in the 1600s.
I love that people forget we (Swedish) enslaved eastern europeans.
All that happened on their day off
Yes. Also most Nazis were black, Himmler was black, he just did the Michael Jackson thing.
Hitler got the idea to hire black dudes after being impressed by Jesse Owens
Yeah, where are the great black geniuses of today if they were so prevalent in every era of human advancement? Are all the achievements from the last 2 millenia simply stolen from any number of hapless but also supposedly brilliant black inventors or scientists, lost and buried in the sands of time?
Clearly they were car jacked in their flying car and enslaved until they were legally retarded by savages living in caves.
It doesn't need to be logically consistent for people to believe it. Pointing out the logical inconsistencies of black power/leftist movements is a waste of time. Their end goal is simply to perpetuate the idea "blacks built civilization and are the superior race" and its working.
Blat Hissory Mumf
Pasolini’s Canterbury Tales
they are just taking the piss now arent they?
it's just a shitpost but irl
If I was black I would be furious at this revisionism as it diminishes and devalues the actual history of immigration and why it happened
How is this shit any different than writing a book claiming that the holocaust was a hoax?
Because denying the holocaust is anudda shoah, while giving negroes endless headpats can only be a good thing
well the holocaust was a hoax
also any book telling that truth would be banned and the author arrested
>also any book telling that truth would be banned and the author arrested
I keep forgetting this site in 2023 is like 80% non-American UK Commonwealth freedomlets
>he thinks America's much better
Non-Americans don't have guaranteed freedom of speech.
Americans don't have guaranteed freedom after speech, though in this case the punishment doesn't necessarily come from the government. Punishment for speech is punishment for speech however.
Hell, take a look at this website, can't even say the nword on the cesspit of the internet anymore.
The fuck are you babbling about? You could never go into private establishments and say what you want. That's not what "freedom of speech" is. The freedom of speech implies exactly what I was responding to: not getting thrown in jail for writing a goddamned book.
>You could never go into private establishments and say what you want
You can't go into public and say what you want without private punishment.
Go viral as a "karen" and see how long it takes for you to get fired.
None of that has anything to do with the government throwing you in jail, numbnuts. It's alway been that way, minus the internet.
>the government
Can you read?
>though in this case the punishment doesn't necessarily come from the government
Punishment doesn't have to come from the government to limit speech.
it's not, and you can and people have published such books in britain despite our otherwise absurd free speech laws
the only notable instance of holocaust denial being met by legal action was because of the author of a shit book denying it was called a denier retard by a reviewer, who he then sued, and lost the case because they proved in court that the holocaust happened and that him denying it makes him retarded and thus her words were not libellous
>because they proved in court that the holocaust happened
No they didn't. They basically said "the holocaust happened, end of discussion".
you know the court records are free to read right
you don't have to say verifiably wrong things just to fit in
You can show me their proof then.
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2000/115.html
knock yourself out
though I had it the wrong way around, the woman said Irving was a denier that knowingly used false evidence and the evidence was indeed proven false to the tune of "this shit doesn't disprove the holocaust"
I asked you to provide their proof not to list the court case. Judging by the fact you aren't willing to defend your statement after saying it's easily searchable, you must've been lying.
>here's the source chud
>3600 lines of text
Post source means post source, not >100 pages. If it was proven in court then post their proof.
But judging by your post you're backpedaling, so I doubt you will.
NTA but you could be the stupidest fucker I've ever seen on this website, and that's impressive. He posted a source retard, face it.
>he posted a source
He posted >100 pages of garbage with "dude trust me, the source is hidden in here". He wants to waste my time, I say no, you present the evidence or admit you're wrong.
If it's actually in there then surely he can find it and show it to the class.
>reading is a waste of time
you'd prefer an infographic? maybe a /misc/ screenshot?
Reading >100 pages looking for a source that may or may not be there is a waste of time, yes. It's an attempt to end the argument by forcing your opponent to leave for hours, even I actually do read the full 3600 lines the thread will be 404'd or some jannie will have banned me by then. No doubt you holocaust believers are furiously reporting every post.
Tell you what, you read Germar Rudolfs book the Chemistry of Auschwitz and get back to me.
You're an idiot or a israelite, possibly both
>because they proved in court that the holocaust happened
Fabricated truths are still lies. It was maybe 300,000 and literally a nothing burger used by israelites to gain plot armor. Anyone going out of their way to disprove deniers is clearly an idiot or a israelite
Seriopusly though the holocaust carries an emotional baggage, unlike other historical events.
Yes sopme people would get upset if you said some ancient african kingdoms were created by whites, but it would not be holocaust denying upset.
i mean if we're going to completely disregard evidence and rewrite history the way we want it to be - transatlantic slavery wasnt even a thing, the holocaust didnt happen, Hitler was black and Ancient Aliens
Why are you mixing truth with obvious falsehoods?
Not everything is equally upsetting. The holocaust part is the most upsetting in what you said, then the transatlantic trade.
For Hitler and Ancient alliens people would just laugh, nobody would care.
But youre choosing to be upset. Personally i couldnt give a fuck about slavery and the holocaust because we know both these things didnt happen and also Black people built Stonehenge.
You know why
I don't know, can one even write such a book in the first place?
Holocaust means we can fuck over Whites.
Black revisionism means we can fuck over Whites.
There are some parallels here.
Anon, nobody needs a reason to fuck over whites. The ability for people to do a action means that action is inherently legitimatized through strength.
"To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself. That was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word 'doublethink' involved the use of doublethink."
Another perfect summation of your idiocy. Imagine claiming you can’t be a liar and stupid at the same time, and then quoting 1984 to defend your point.
They might be right. We don't know how it took humans migrating out of Africa to turn white
>We don't know how it took humans migrating out of Africa to turn white
>he believes the debunked cradle of life claim
out of apefrica has been disproven, keep up with the times
oldest modern man remains were found in Greece, and date back 350k years.
subsaharan africans have 19% chimpanzee blood in them, and 0% neanderthal, setting them apart from the rest of the world.
subsaharan africans are genetically closer to chimpanzees than Europeans are to africans
>out of apefrica has been disproven,
It hasn't.
No way you still think this
yes it has. discredited and disproven.
this is old news, you should stay more up to date, keep with the times.
older remains have been found in southern china even, about 300k years old.
It hasn't. The first modern man evolved in Africa. We know this. They did not evolve in China.
>If they were all totally memetic then the steps would be the same.
Correct. They are all the same.
Me claiming to be French, Bantu, Turkish, Nigerian, White, Norwegian, Jersey, or Sicilian all requires the exact same step: Me saying I am.
>subsaharan africans have 19% chimpanzee blood in them
Anon, the total difference between all people in 0.4% The difference between a human and a rat is about 8%. You are, again, totally mental.
>he doesn't know
19% dna for subsaharan africans, stemming from 3 unidentified lower primates, which is NOT found in the rest of the planet.
2-10% neanderthal dna in all populations outside of subsaharan africans.
mathematics, simple mathematics.
It's not that i don't know, it's that it's total nonsense.
>mathematics, simple mathematics.
If you understand thoseyou would realize you are digging yourself into a incredibly deep hole.
cope, you can't hide from the truth forever.
it'll haunt you every single day.
19% chimpanzee and minus the 10% neanderthal that makes humans human.
sounds like 29% difference already.
a horse has more in common with a tomato.
WE
WUZ
You need to go back
dude, nobody likes naggers. they are nothing more than trash and they only hold us back. kill yourself and help make this a better world
2 choice
>off yourselves
>go back
I'm fine with either.
you are not in good company, kill yourself and make your dad happy for once
>you are not in good company
I can see that, why don't you help me?
I am, drink bleach and embrace whatever hell you believe in
I meant by fucking off, not by telling me what you do with your day.
Do it, imagine never seeing the pain of regret every time your father looks at you. I know you can see it in his eyes.
You seem to think about my father a lot, will talking to him make you go away?
no you are just transparent. I know you are a weak, sniveling, coward. and no man could possibly look at you with any amount of pride. end it all and find peace
What can I do to make you go away? Will anything achieve this result?
you know what I want. I have made that clear, no?
Not really, you've just been going on about my father. What is it you want that will make you fuck off?
I will add stupid to the list as well.
Do so, you're still not telling me what you want.
I have done so multiple times. just scroll up. also have another nagger word, nagger
Fine, I will let you talk to my father, now can you go away?
no
Kys dumb nagger
reminder that "you need to go back" is directed towards third world illegal immigrants.
the left can't meme
DRUIDZ N SHIET
Zamn is there anything blick poopoo can't do
>Get hit countless times by screeching woman
>Public cheers
>Retaliate ONCE and everyone will jump on you sjw-style
That is why keeping the target on a hold is the best option here
Unironically the only reason not to hit women is because it'll always hurt you more
My ex abused me in public one time. She legit punched my face, broke my fingers, and just scratched me. No one helped me. Some laughed. Part of the reason why I'm broken.
find her and kick her teeth in while wearing a balaclava.
make sure you set up some kind of alibi first, and wear second hand clothes to do it, then throw them away far away from where you or she lives.
need to regain your fury
imagine getting btfo by a small girl
he literally just tripped
the little demon thing technically tripped him while also hitting him.
wasn't intentional but it was effective.
micro-judo
what is the best way to most productively resolve this situation?
>what is the best way to most productively resolve this situation?
TND.
>Arthur
How the fuck do the English get off pretending he's a national hero? They are literally the evil barbarous horde that wants to burn down Camelot in that story.
the book says british not english, welsh are british
Nothing in British history compares with the Teapot Dome scandal
Why is the original MMPR megazord so based?
You’d think since it was the 13th season or whatever in Japan that it would be creatively bankrupt at that point, but it is legit the coolest and best designed one.
I don’t want to turn this into power rangers autism, I don’t care if you like the train one, I’m just saying.
I'm more interested in the history of Voltage Vengerz
?
checked it out
>White people are evil
>They stole your country from you
>And they have privilege, they only help themselves
>We outnumber them ten to one by the way
>>israelites are evil
>>They stole your country from you
>>And they have privilege, they only help themselves
>>We outnumber them ten to one by the way
>White people are the global minority
WHITEBROS, IT'S OFFICIAL, WE ARE A MINORITY
RACISM AGAINST US IS ILLEGAL
Awful definition. By that logic meds aren't white and there are also shit loads of non meds that can tan.
Europeans are Caucasian regardless of skin tone. Caucasians come in many skin tones.
>caucasian
not a scientific term, it is incorrectly used and doesn't apply to europeans
>white people are the minority
>yet a large portion of those darker tone cultures have praised lighter skin as more beautiful long before making contact with white Europeans
What the fuck bongistan
Oh my fucking god
Why do they equate “there were some black people“ with “they were everywhere”
because once you get away with a lie you go even grander on the next one. they are like children
Also
>someones skin was slightly darker!
>that means they were sub-saharan african!
Don't forget
>they were born in (north) africa
>that means they were coal black
This is what pissed me off. No one from Rome got past the Sahara and so wouldn't know those people existed. Only Northern Africans were integrated into Rome.
>North Africa was part of ancient Rome
>North Africa is part of Africa
>therefore Romans were Bantu, just like ancient Egyptians
UK government funds the promotion of this shit
Why do you?
there was one ethiopian roman solider in britain and it was such an odd thing that even a roman general who was born in north africa was shocked and thought it was a bad omen
It's so sad, they used to be errythang but got mind wiped by racism field and even forgot how to invent the humble wheel
I guess white people are just that powerful
the melanin shield protected their physical bodies buy they lost their telepathic black excellence
We are so good at this we refined the process into one six letter word.
the name you shall not pronounce: NGGR
It's really funny how you would end up thinking the Empire was a wholly good thing that only uplifted darkies if you watched the BBC
>israelites are black
how the fuck did they get away with this
>Robin Hood
Funny you should mention that
Robbing in the hood for sure
>Robbin' Hood
Fixed that for you
>I wish I'd had this book when I was a kid
ESL here, is this correct? "I'd had"? Not "I had" or "I would have had"?
>I wish I had had
>I wish I had
>I would have had
are all correct
>naggers 10.000 years ago - Mudhuts, Stone tools and stone circles
>naggers today - same, but stone circle tech is now lost
"Been Here from the Start" is a real banger courtesy of the BCC
?si=uQznNTYLSu0MpKVH
>Cheddar mas has been disproved by actual genetic markers that point he had at worst olive skin (3%) and at most very pale skin (46%), creators of the bust literally say they just gave him that skin color just because
>There's only a SINGLE account of a black legionaire in all history of Britannia
>Only 250 black people accounted in the 1500s, out of a 7 million population at the time
They keep making shit up aren't they?
Its a new religion being born anon, it doesn't need to make sense.
mas has been disproved by actual genetic markers that point he had at worst olive skin (3%) and at most very pale skin (46%), creators of the bust literally say they just gave him that skin color just because
I don't know where you get those numbers from.
>Cheddar mas has been disproved by actual genetic markers that point he had at worst olive skin (3%) and at most very pale skin (46%), creators of the bust literally say they just gave him that skin color just because
Wasn't he also found within walking distance from an era cemetery, meaning he was likely an outsider? Add that to the knowledge that you can in fact walk from africa to Europe (and probably to England too at the time) in 6-12 months, and a single persons existence doesn't mean shit.
No. Cheddar man was a typical WHG. They all lacked skin lightening alleles that are common in modern Europeans.
They were less related to Africans than modern Swedes, though. Today Balts have the most of their ancestry.
I didn't say he was african, just that he happened to be one it doesn't mean anything due to being an outsider.
People like him lived in Europe before the neolithic.
b shows frequency of different alleles.
HERC2/OCA2 - blue eyes
SLCA425 and SLC45A2 lighter skin color
LCT - lactase tolerance
There's also comparison to frequency in modern populations.
CEU - Central Europe/Utah (whites)
GBR - Great Britain
IBS - Iberia
TSI - Tuscany
WHich means makes sense for him to be black if he's related to Iberia and Tuscany
He's not. You don't seem to understand. Those are relic populations.
He was a Western Hunter Gatherer (Oberkassel in my picture). These guys seem to came from the Balkans after the end of Last Glacial Maximum and repopulated Europe.
The other group survived in Iberia but they got fucked into extinction by the Balkan group.
At the same time different people (who were actually much lighter) lived in Russia, they spread to Scandinavia, Ukraine, Baltics and the Balkans mixing with the typical Western Hunter Gatherers. All those Eastern mutts had varying degrees of light skin alleles, but pure WHG (including Cheddar Man) had none.
That's the story. None of them were in any way related to blacks.
They're clearly Black retard, why are you people so against Black people's accomplishments? in fact in which way it affects you on your daily life what they did?
Black people are retroactively claiming accomplishments and history that doesnt belong them...because people were mean to them. Why would you support that? What if the Irish claimed that they colonized Brazil? Would you be against the accomplishments of the Irish?
You have been doing it for millennia and now you act like you care about history?
Im not methuselah I didn’t do shit. I’ve got the internet. Edison was a patent troll, Lewis and Clark had a brown lady sherpa and Columbus was a rapist. Im not my lack of melanin. Im not going to let a goth girl burn me to death for eating mushrooms because people that look kinda similar to us did that 400 years ago.
Take your weird cultural snuff porn somewhere else. Don’t lay the group identity hangups you have adopted as a way to cope with yourself being uninteresting as an individual somewhere else.
literally every human being in all of human history up to the last 60 years would've called you genuinely insane for this post. the last 60 years incidentally being the most self-destructive humanity has ever been, we're now at negative population growth due to hopelessness because of retarded posts like yours. your ideas represent the most malignant ideology that has ever been produced by humanity, whose only logical conclusion is suicide or slavery. and you're too dumb to even realize it, in spite of a lifetime worth of evidence. I guess outright denying reality is the only way it's possible to cope.
>literally every human being in all of human history up to the last 60 years would've called you genuinely insane for this post
1960? I think you overestimate yourself.
Either way, that's not a argument. For most of human history people believed that if they threw virgin girls into rivers it would stop them from flooding. It didn't.
> the last 60 years incidentally being the most self-destructive humanity has ever been
Read a history book.
>we're now at negative population growth
Oh god, at the current rate we'll go extinct at the rate of... Uh, never. Well, shit. So much for that argument.
>we're now at negative population growth
Damn. Worse than that one king who decided to massacre his entire population just because he could?
>post says I’m not my ancestors and I don’t support being subjected to the the same injustice or oppression that your ancestors faced just because you’ve chosen to think you’re some kind of incarnation of their collective suffering as a cope for not being a unique person
I seriously don’t think anyone on this website reads posts for comprehension anymore they just scan for keywords so that their brain can go with the preprogrammed response that aligns with whatever said keywords identify as the user’s ideological slant.
>Why would you support that?
NTA but I find it funny. All nationalism/ethnic/race is like this. It's all laughably pathetic stolen valor nonsense. There is no practical difference to me between a modern British person claiming King Arthur and a modern Black person claiming they build Stonehenge.
>What if the Irish claimed that they colonized Brazil?
What do you mean "If"? People make retarded claims like all the time.
>People make retarded claims like all the time
What Bill the garbageman can get away saying in the pub after a few beers shouldn't be the same of what a Phd on History says on tv or the current academics are trying to push
>What Bill the garbageman can get away saying in the pub after a few beers shouldn't be the same of what a Phd on History says on tv or the current academics are trying to push
I agree. A shame that, both now and in the past, it was.
>I don't like my nation/ethnicity/race so therefor none if it is real. Culture no real, heritage no real, inheritance no real. It's all just make believe and we're on people the human people.
>Obviously this means everything good you think is yours is actually mine too.
How convenient for you.
>I don't like my nation/ethnicity/race so therefor none if it is real.
? I like my country just fine. Race and ethnicity is still total memetic nonsense with zero bearing on reality and any attempt at nationalism or ethnic pride is just stolen valor by people with nothing personally to offer.
>Culture no real,
Define culture.
>heritage no real,
Correct. You are no more the people during whatever golden age your country had than you are a random Chinese peasant. In fact, in most cases, you are most likely to be closer to the latter.
>inheritance no real
I'm not exactly lugging around crap from six hundred years ago around my home.
>It's all just make believe
Yes.
>Obviously this means everything good you think is yours is actually mine too.
Everything belongs to everybody only insofar that they can defend and legitimatize their claim. Even if you want to argue a morale case for ownership exists, that does not change the reality that any actual enforcement of that ownership is based entirely on force.
>and we're on people the human people.
Yes.
>I'm not exactly lugging around crap from six hundred years ago around my home.
you LITERALLY are. where do you think your home came from? you think it just sprung out of the earth, like from a magical garden? that god gave it to you? that the world was created yesterday?
>you LITERALLY are.
The fuck? You're telling me that when I was playing Dark Souls on my computer this morning, I was actually touching a six hundred year old computer?
>you think it just sprung out of the earth, like from a magical garden?
No, it was build by people post world war 2 and then renovated in the eighties.
>Race and ethnicity is still total memetic nonsense with zero bearing on reality
When a White mother and White father can create a full blooded Bantu child, I'll believe you.
My son is dark skinned, you might even describe him as "Bantu" in looks complete with woolly hair. Yet my wife and I are both pale blonds- turns out she must have had some African American in her ancestry that lay dormant for generations but finally revealed itself in our son. At the end of the day, skin color is only skin deep.
Ha
anon, contact a lawyer, you have been tricked
I know this is probably a shitpost but knowing the cucks on this board there's a very real chance you're serious.
>turns out she must have had some African American in her
yeah no shit
>my wife's son
just goes to show that genetics are made up nonsense, and really anything can happen
some big cope there. Genuinely feel sorry for the people replying to you.
>no argument
Yawn.
>And yet they won't even make a partial Bantu child
Partial? Is 99.6% not partial enough for you?
How convenient, that means you don't have to actually make a argument.
>How convenient, that means you don't have to actually make a argument.
I have no interest in taking a liar seriously.
Very convenient.
>Is the child Bantu
I declare it to be Bantu. Since the idea of being Bantu is 100% memetic. He is now a Bantu.
I win.
Dutch.
>I declare it to be Bantu.
And you are wrong. Just because it's memetic doesn't mean it isn't real, the term is a classification for observable reality. Just because "truck" is an abstract term that encompasses a large variety of vehicles it doesn't mean that a VW Beetle (I'm referring to the Herbie-type) can be considered a truck. Then again you sound like the kind of person who'd say "One transportation equipment, the vehicle transportation equipment", right?
The mutt doesn't realize that socially constructed taxonomies can still be useful
>Partial? Is 99.6% not partial enough for you?
Is the child Bantu? No? Then it isn't.
You’re Mexican, right?
Brazilian mullato is my guess
It’s so obviously a israelite.
>babies come with the stork
why are all leftists at the developmental level of kindernagrdeners?
Babies come from people. Not heritage or culture.
Are you fucking joking? People come from people. Culture comes from people. People come from culture. It's all the same thing. Your culture is as much genetic as everything else about you. Literally ALL your mental and physical traits are genetically inherited. All your thoughts and ideas are genetically derived. Saying otherwise is like saying you can teach a dog to talk. Or a rock. You can't argue that you're NOT 100% your genes without arguing that you're no different from a rock. Do you really not understand where ANYTHING comes from? And that a dog can sit on your sofa as well as you can doesn't mean your dog can create a sofa. A sofa isn't just a thing that appeared out of nowhere. It took tens of thousands of years to get to a sofa. Your modern sofa, nobody but a modern european could've made, literally. Only they created the technologies necessary to build that sofa. That other people can emulate it afterwards is like saying that because you can understand relativity you came up with it. You're talking about fucking stolen valor, your whole series of posts is a huge appeal to stolen valor, FROM the europeans to everyone else. They have created EVERYTHING new for the last 400 years. Even inane cultura things like, oh, black people created this music or whatever, was only possible because of europeans, because euroepans created the technology that made it possible to make that music in the first place. Literally everything, dude. EVERYTHING. Your whole fucking premise is a massive revisionism of human history, motivated by I have no idea what. Some kind of pathetic attempt at feeling better about yourself for "knowing better"; you don't fucking know better. You're the midwit retard in the meme who thinks he's clever by being wronger than both the geniuses and the morons. I'm sick of you dumb shits. You know NOTHING ,and you're proud of it? Fucking disgusting.
>Your culture is as much genetic as everything else about you.
Nonsense, it's memetic.
>Literally ALL your mental and physical traits are genetically inherited.
About 50-70% by modern scientific estimates.
>All your thoughts and ideas are genetically derived.
Meme theory correctly disagrees.
>Saying otherwise is like saying you can teach a dog to talk.
No, what you are doing is using pseudo scientific rhetoric to justify your believes. Your very questionable believes.
>You can't argue that you're NOT 100% your genes without arguing that you're no different from a rock.
You can, very easily in fact. Mostly because, and this part is going to be really hard for you to understand, but there is this thing called reality. Try cutting a rock, then try cutting yourself. See the difference in result.
>Do you really not understand where ANYTHING comes from?
Do you? Because clearly, you do not.
>Your modern sofa, nobody but a modern european could've made, literally.
You mean my modern sofa that was made in... let me check... India.
>Only they created the technologies necessary to build that sofa.
They didn't. In fact, non European countries had the means to build sofa's centuries before Europe.
>They have created EVERYTHING new for the last 400 years.
Yes. Before that they were a tiny backwater with no importance to the rest of teh world.
>Even inane cultura things like, oh, black people created this music or whatever, was only possible because of europeans
Oh yeah, because nobody had music before Europeans did.
>Literally everything, dude.
Literally nothing. If every European was exterminated 500 years ago, their entire culture and people wiped out. People would still have Sofa's, they would still have the instruments to play Jazz, and they would probably still have computers.
>Your whole fucking premise is a massive revisionism of human history,
No. You are just totally insane. Off your rockers crazy, to be frank.
You have done nothing here but show your willful ignorance
It must be brutal being this retarded yet determined.
It must be brutal to be totally mental.
>Just because it's memetic doesn't mean it isn't real, the
Because it's memetic IT ISN'T real. If you want to argue it has it uses, and you can do that, then you should. But by it's nature as a meme it will never be a part of reality.
>Just because "truck" is an abstract term that encompasses a large variety of vehicles it doesn't mean that a VW Beetle (I'm referring to the Herbie-type) can be considered a truck
You can literally turn a VW Beetle into a truck. This is not a argument that you are going to win using that metaphor. Granted, you can't win it at all but you should at least try and use a better metaphor.
>Then again you sound like the kind of person who'd say "One transportation equipment, the vehicle transportation equipment", right?
You sound like the type of person who would claim something isn't transportation equipment just because it doesn't meet some arbitrary standard.
Unwrapping your ball of lies, half truths, underhanded maneuvers, stupidity and deceits is asking too much of any sane person. I assume you win most of your arguments through this tactic of lying so often nobody could bear to untangle your falsehoods. It’s easier just to call you a liar and a fag.
>is asking too much of any sane person
Not that you would know what it's like to be one.
>I assume you win most of your arguments
Correct.
> this tactic of lying so often nobody could bear to untangle your falsehoods.
Am I stupid or am I lying? Because it can't be both. Either I'm speaking from a position of genuine ignorance or I am lying.
Ever heard of doublethink?
>Am I stupid or am I lying? Because it can't be both
Perfect summation of your idiocy.
What exactly is mutually contradictory about being both stupid and a liar?
You can't be misinformed and lying about a singular thing. If i believe in something due to low intelligence, it is not a lie for me to say I believe in that thing. If I do not believe in a thing, but I claim I do so anyway, then it is a lie. It cannot be both a lie and a mistake.
If you want to claim I lie about somethings and are incorrect about others, that would be one thing. You don't, because you are mentally insane.
See what I mean? People like this are best exposed by not engaging in the original argument. They show themselves as utter fools when asked the simplest question.
>See what I mean
You are engaging in Doublethink, yes.
>you are mentally insane
You're the one claiming culture and genetics aren't real. Did you forget to take your meds this morning?
>You're the one claiming culture and genetics aren't real.
I am claiming culture is memetic (It is) and genetic disproves your ideas (It does).
You have failed to argue against either point.
One. After that, they'll happily hang you.
Arguing with you is a waste of time, all you do is dance around in circles and spout non sequiturs.
>Arguing with you is a waste of time
Likewise. You should be grateful I tried to civilize you nonetheless.
I do.
>You should be grateful I tried to civilize you nonetheless.
>can't string a single sentence together without glaring grammatical errors a child would be ashamed of
lel, but don't stop. Gotta have something to laugh at.
>can't string a single sentence together without glaring grammatical errors a child would be ashamed of
Pot calling the kettle black, much?
>Imagine being Egyptian
Imagine being Egyptian and having random ass Arabs claim they build the Pyramids.
No. Innocent men did the torture. Because torturing Nazis is not a crime.
Ancient Egyptians are most closely related to Arabs - Yemenis, Saudis.
>Ancient Egyptians are most closely related to Arabs - Yemenis, Saudis.
>Most closely
Might as well just say "not at all".
No one is quite like them, but Arabs are closest.
Distance to: Egypt_ThirdIntermediatePeriod
0.04873858 Yemenite_Dhamar
0.05017580 Yemenite_Amran
0.05215462 Yemenite_Ma'rib
0.05564198 Yemenite_israelite
0.05746597 Yemenite_Al_Bayda
0.05851720 BedouinA
0.05912239 Yemenite_Al_Jawf
0.06003455 SaudiB
0.06047611 SaudiA
0.06340249 Palestinian
This is late period, but there are some leaks regarding samples from Old Kingdom and they look similar. Apparently closest to Natufians.
Distance to: Israel_Natufian
0.08946889 Yemenite_Mahra
0.09496955 BedouinB
0.09919015 Yemenite_Al_Bayda
0.09990250 Yemenite_Al_Jawf
0.09991202 Tunisian_Rbaya
0.10057345 Yemenite_Ma'rib
0.10061161 Yemenite_Dhamar
0.10342678 Saudi
0.10689865 Yemenite_israelite
0.11120991 SaudiB
>but Arabs are closest.
They are only slightly more close than West Africans. Let alone, say, Ethiopia.
>He doesn't know about Nuremberg
You should read up how many times the Nazis got kicked in the balls by British soldiers.
and you dont have the fortitude to be a soldier, my point stands
>You should read up how many times the Nazis got kicked in the balls by British soldiers.
They weren't. It's a meme. There was a whole court case about these allegations. It's also not Nuremberg, but Dachau trials and it was about Malmedy massacre.
Got a link?
https://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/04/137-crushed-lies-or-why-denial-is.html
He asked for a source not a blog post.
>the "kicked in the nuts" claims were misattributed to some American judge
>he said that there was evidence that some were knocked in the balls, but the claim that "all but 2 were tortured" was inaccurate and not a statement he made
This doesn't exactly deboonk the idea that confessions were given under duress
A shame if true.
>No, even Swedes would be closer to Egyptians than West Africans.
Nope. About as close.
>By your same logic, the difference between an apple and an orange is a fantasy, because they're both fruits.
No, because differences between fruits exist and can be understood. Racial differences cannot.
>They are only slightly more close than West Africans. Let alone, say, Ethiopia.
No, even Swedes would be closer to Egyptians than West Africans. Ethiopians also weren't that close. Horners have too much Nilotic ancestry.
people like you never have the stomach for violence all us "nazis" are safe
>No. Innocent men did the torture.
Innocent men don't torture others.
Others implies that nazis are people.
>Not breeds
?
>as there are distinct species which can produce fertile hybrid offspring like zonkeys and ligers
Neither hybrid is fertile.
It can't because race is not real.
>not a definition,
Similar traits does not just mean they look similar. This is not subjective, you just fail at biology.
You don't need to be a soldier to kill pests.
The truth? Anon, the truth that you are ignoring is literally so fundamental to biology and modern genetics that by ignoring it you have shown how little you care for the truth.
>Others implies that nazis are people.
Of course they're people, why wouldn't they be? Because you arbitrarily decided so?
> why wouldn't they be?
Because they do not act, think, or understand the world in the same way people do. In every possible measure in which humanity is defined, including their own, they fall outside of it.
What science?
Species is a very simple classification: Can it breed and produce fertile offspring?
There you go. Simple, clean, to the point. No question or doubt remaining. Unlike race, which is all doubt.
>Species is a very simple classification: Can it breed and produce fertile offspring?
See
https://www.zonkey.co.uk/about/zonkey/#:~:text=If%20you%20have%20a%20male,in%20zoos%20around%20the%20world.
>Sadly the Zonkey is a sterile creature
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liger#:~:text=Male%20ligers%20are%20consequently%20sterile,at%20the%20Munich%20Hellabrunn%20Zoo.
>Male ligers are consequently sterile,
>Because they do not act, think, or understand the world in the same way people do.
According to who? You, their mortal enemy?
It sounds like you're just an angry israelite calling people he doesn't like subhuman. It sounds like you have a lot of growing up to do.
>According to who?
According to themselves.
Those that do not believe in humanity are not part of it.
>According to themselves.
Why do you israelites keep lying? You wouldn't be so hated if you didn't lie at every opportunity.
heeb
prove species exist, oh wait you can't
look at this kike go
No argument? Sad, very sad. But expected.
israelite
Very antisemitic of you. It’s not their fault they are genetically predisposed to schizophrenia.
>Because it's memetic IT ISN'T real.
It's clearly real, your eyes can prove as much, genetic has proven it even further. Denying the species exists just because there's differences in the individual is as retarded as it gets.
>You can literally turn a VW Beetle into a truck.
So you admit a VW Beetle isn't a truck, because you would need to turn it into one. Thank you for admitting you're wrong.
>You sound like the type of person who would claim something isn't transportation equipment just because it doesn't meet some arbitrary standard.
You couldn't even come up with a metaphor lmao. Ironic considering your previous statement.
But yes, if something doesn't fit the definition then it isn't of that classification. No, your cat isn't transportation equipment (I don't mean those big trucks, I mean the furry thing).
You're obsessed by grey areas.
How about we go one better. You autists like colours don't you?
Is blue blue? Yes.
If we add 5% red is the new blue still blue? Yes.
If we continue this process is there a point at which it turns into purple and then red? Yes.
Does that mean "blue" doesn't exist? No.
>your eyes can prove as much,
People used to believe, genuinly believe, that sea monsters existed. In reality, they were whale dicks.
Your eyes can lie.
>genetic has proven it even further.
It hasn't. It's totally discredited it and showed it to be purely memetic.
>Denying the species exists just because there's differences in the individual is as retarded as it gets.
As is claiming a species exist when it does not.
>So you admit a VW Beetle isn't a truck, because you would need to turn it into one
Correct. Just like me claiming a white child is a Bantu means he is a Bantu.
>You couldn't even come up with a metaphor lmao
I have no need for a metaphor. That is literally what you are doing.
>But yes, if something doesn't fit the definition
Which you cannot define.
> No, your cat isn't transportation equipment
If I put a leash around my cat's neck and give it a backpack. It's transportation equipment.
>Does that mean "blue" doesn't exist?
Blue can be measured and defined.
>Your eyes can lie.
They saw "sea monsters" for a split second, possibly while drunk as sailors like to be. The entirety of human history has viewed and accepts ethnic groups and races.
>It hasn't. It's totally discredited it and showed it to be purely memetic.
t. your ass.
Did you know that AI can detect what race someone is to a high degree of accuracy just by seeing an xray of their chest?
>As is claiming a species exist when it does not.
It very clearly does exist. Next you'll be arguing humans are actually koala's, one mammal the mammalian mammal.
>Correct. Just like me claiming a white child is a Bantu means he is a Bantu.
You're arguing against your own statement.
You haven't turned that child into a Bantu, so no he isn't a Bantu. That would require some serious gene editing so good luck with that.
You admitted the VW Beetle isn't a truck, because you said you would need to turn it into a truck for it to be a truck.
>Which you cannot define.
It's defined well enough for 99.9% of the world. You're the exception here.
>If I put a leash around my cat's neck and give it a backpack. It's transportation equipment.
So yet again you admit your cat isn't a transportation equipment, that it would need to be modified to turn into one.
>Blue can be measured and defined.
So can race and ethnicity.
How does one go through life with the severe mental retardation you're clearly suffering from?
The core of leftist philosophy is feels over reals. Even if most people don't understand the philosophical basis of the lefty principles they want to hold, it still boils down to this outlook. If everything is subjective and there is no greater objective truth (reals) then there can be nothing to prevent what they want to be true (feels) from being correct. That's why leftist thinking is so inherently attractive to people whether they know it or not. You can preform whatever mental gymnastics are necessary to ensure you're never forced to face reality.
>There is no practical difference to me between a modern British person claiming King Arthur and a modern Black person claiming they build Stonehenge.
Britain has a long standing cultural connection to the legend of King Arthur as well as an obvious geographic one. Sub Saharan Africans have literally no connection whatsoever, either genetic or cultural or geographic, to Stonehenge.
>Britain has a long standing cultural connection to the legend of King Arthur
>Cultural tradition
So, nothing.
>as well as an obvious geographic one
Camelot isn't even a real place, you dolt.
>Sub Saharan Africans have literally no connection whatsoever, either genetic or cultural or geographic, to Stonehenge.
The fact that they are currently in England gives them a equally strong connecting to Stonehenge as any modern British person has to King Arthur.
Weird how you can spot dishonesty from a person’s arguing style before you even know what side of the argument the person is on.
/leftypol/ trannies pass around "how to argue" documentation, so they all follow the same script.
it's more or less based on communist propaganda techniques and results in either avoiding the topic completely or picking on one tiny detail until everything else is forgotten.
other than that, it's outright lying, demanding absolute proof for something otherwise incredibly obvious, or deluging the discussion with links to irrelevant information so as to waste time and exhaust.
none of it is based on logic truth, or reasoning.
They are forced to, their mudhutter ancestors were enslaved and sold off by actual black kingdoms. Now they need to claim britain/america/europe/west were always black. It's to justify their existence here/make a place for them.
Anon, the fact they were enslaved is enough of a reason to justify their existence and place here. By all rights they should be demanding you kneel and prostrate before them at all times.
It is rather interesting that all the other continents somewhat individually developed their own cultures, societies, accomplishments etc. Yet, while all of this was going on, Africa really didnt do much. Fast forward a few 1000 years, and Africans claim they were part of and invented everything.
>Yet, while all of this was going on, Africa really didnt do much.
It did. You are just extremely ignorant and comparing the most isolated parts of Africa where nobody lived to the rest of the world. It's like comparing Egypt with Eskimos living in North Finnand and concluding "Clearly, all Europeans are ignorant and backwards".
Begorrah, don't ye denay oor achievements laddie.
*if he happened to be one
disingenuous kikery at play again
it continues:
> - but did have dozens of other genes related to pale skin which I'll conveniently ignore. also lived in a place where there had been ice ages for hundreds of thousands of years, and is directly related to remains found in Europe from 350,000 years ago. I don't know how evolution works, don't know about genetics but if I repeat alleles enough times someone will believe me and that's all the jdf want from me. mission accomplished
Most of what you wrote is just a fantasy. You don't know much about prehistory.
The first West Eurasians (not even closely related to WHG) showed up in Europe after 40,000 BP (Aurignacians). First WHG show up in our record around 17,000 BP in Italy.
No one lived in Britain during the Last Glacial Maximum. This region was repopulated from the South, originally apparently by people related to the Fournol cluster (Aurignacians/Magdalenians/Solutreans), but they got later replaced by the Oberkassel cluster (Cheddar man - WHG).
>350,000 years ago
Most likely unrelated to any later Homo sapiens. It doesn't matter because we will probably never get its DNA.
The two Tudor era servants mentioned in the song weren't black either. They were Spanish Moors serving Catherine of Aragon. They're promoting the lie that North Africans were the same as Sub Saharan Bantus.
the first LIE is the only thing people remember.
this was disproven by the scientists who analysed the genetic material in the first place within days of the pair of israelite in the netherlands releasing their propaganda piece.
note that the ones making the sculpture had nothing to do with the genetic research, and simply linked their thing with it based on LIES.
doesnt matter how many times it is refuted though, because morons only believe the first lie they hear.
the kikey shits repeat it endlessly, and the sensationalist rubbish is passed around by fools and idiots.
I think we can all agree that journalists should all be hung in the public square, after a fair and unbiased trial of their (non-journalist) peers.
let's do it.
how many need to hang before everyone else joins in
>Septimius Severus
>He was born in Leptis Magna (present-day Al-Khums, Libya)
so obviously he was a sub-saharan west african black..
also funny how conquest and colonialism are good things when romans did it
>also funny how conquest and colonialism are good things when romans did it
British had no civilization. So, yes.
>British had no civilization
>Gauls and Celts didn't count as civilizations
>Gauls and Celts didn't count as civilization
1: Gauls were Celts. 2: Gauls were just Celts that lived in France. 3: No.
>When a White mother and White father can create a full blooded Bantu child
There is no such thing as a full blooded bantu child because there are no bantu genes or even Bantu genetic patterns.
>There is no such thing as a full blooded bantu child
And yet they won't even make a partial Bantu child, because they aren't Bantu themselves.
But congratulations on dodging the point, I accept your concession.
The Gauls came first seeing how they had to cross the ocean to get to the British Isles.
Again, Gauls are literally just Celts living in what is now known as France.
>There arent that many people left who are truly of a pure bloodline.
Let me correct that for you:
There are zero.
It's the other way around. Celts came to Britain from France.
Correct. But they stopped being Gauls the moment they moved into Britain.
Im from Missouri, if I move to Texas do I stop being from Missouri?
Yes.
You have done nothing but show your complete insanity.
There you go again. Good luck in life bud, you're going to need it
I would say the same. But, no, you are beyond help.
Useful? to be sure. Rooted in reality? possibly. Reflective of material reality? No.
>Rooted in reality? possibly. Reflective of material reality? No.
What's the difference between reality and "material reality".
NTA but xir will need a few minutes to get an appropriate answer from xir's discord server
>crossed ocean
>English Channel
>full blooded
There arent that many people left who are truly of a pure bloodline. Most people are some percentage mixed, and as time goes on more and more mixed.
How does this change my point? Why are you being autistic?
Race and ethnicity aren't accidents, they're products of sex between people (not like you'd know what that's like).
there's no such thing as species.
a tree is just the same as a jellyfish.
wolves and ants go hand in hand.
subsaharan negroids separated by half a million years of evolution are the same as thoroughbred northern European demigods.
you can't tell a great dane from a scottish terrier just by looking.
Ethiopians are the true inheritors of israel and should all be given passports immediately.
>only one of these statements is true
>there's no such thing as species.
Sure there is. Not race though.
no, define species. where exactly does one end and the next begin?
it's a made up term for a non existent concept
He was half Roman half Phoenician, not black in the slightest but of course because he was born in Africa he's full Bantu. like Elon Musk
>Septimius Severus
BBC show affirms that yes he was an African emperor and "black man"
?si=jj-TiEz9Z5p76q_i&t=140
not my horrible histories
>the viking song
Get with the times Chud
do you think anyone feels embarrassed to be a part of this, or are they all true believers/doing it for the cause?
israelites running it, and then art students fresh out of university doing the rest, with 50% of them being third world diversity quota filling elements, and a large part being trannies, dykes and feminists that have been taught to 'rebel'.
any with the slightest doubts flashing across their eyes while doing it will either have a sudden fear that they'll be called a "ray-ziz" and lose their job, or that they are committing a sin by questioning it.
it's the emperor's new clothes behaviour control technique; people are more afraid of being labelled a non-believer than stating a simple truth
Where I live, Czech Republic, one would e.g. say "on the place TODAY called Britain, a thousand of years ago Stonehenge was built"
I have noticed that it is common to say Brits are people living in Britain and Britain is simply a piece of land disconnected from history. So the Island is "Britain" today, during Romans and a tens of thousands years before, and the people living there are Brits today, during Romans and tens of thousands years before. I find that very strange way and when framed like this, indeed anyone is a migrants. The framing itself is stupid.
Here, nobody would ever say the Neolitic cultures that are being uncovered are the Czechs, simply because they are being uncovered within the borders of what is TODAY Czech Republic. Those were entirely different people.
Sure, we even have their ancient DNA.
Yes, but even "respective" newspapers, would frame it as if Cheddar Man being black, somehow means the blacks of today "have always been here", even though. I have seen children of first gen immigrants saying "we have always been part of Britain".
Blame centuries of propaganda trying to create a unified British identity.
if you want another word to find strange, realise that "migrant" is newspeak that was pushed in 2015 by all the media simultaneously to remove the distinction of immigrant or emigrant, so there is no claim to a direction of travel or homeland.
it spread on here just as fast because the vast majority of people have no clue what they are saying, and can't remember anything beyond six months ago.
"migrate" is something birds do every winter/summer as they go back and forth.
"immigrants" despite being a factual term for someone entering your country, quickly gained a negative connotation as the word was most often seen in news articles about crime - tape, murder, robbery and so on.
Stonehenge was built by Atlanteans. As for the colour of their skin, unknown but probably white.
I dont agree with everything that Graham Hancock claims...but the general idea that "Atlanteans" did exist is pretty reasonable. Stonehenge, Pyramids, etc are from this older more advanced group that disappeared...aka Atlanteans.
Why are they like this?
Because they want to believe. Everything, EVERYTHING, is better than being British.
birds fly, ants crawl, snakes slither and israelite kike
There was a dream that was Rome
Whites are hated for being popular or beautiful and rich basically.
If you are poor and ugly they don't care so ultimately I think this is just about power hunger which is sad for the soul
>Rich white people like to be clean
???
>being clean is racist
What?
If only you knew...
what's this shit? looks like a falseflag done by /misc/
it's real
https://www.newsweek.com/smithsonian-race-guidelines-rational-thinking-hard-work-are-white-values-1518333
How do you uncuck yourself Brits? i need a plan of action
How do we all?
There is no "fixing" England. The problem with England is that there is no release. They want, no, need the harsh hand of judgement to utterly destroy their country. But, it won't happen. They continue to walk along, waiting for a end that never comes. For justice that will never be felt. In a way, it is far worse.
this poster lives in an even more kiked country and has never been to england
>WE WUZ DRUIDS N SHEIT
Reminder that euros conquered half the world and forced an end to chattel slavery that had been practiced there since prehistory. Had it not been for european colonization, those people would have never stopped enslaving each other. Somehow this has been twisted into "wypipol are responsible for slavery and must pay forever".
if they'd used that money to kill every last yid, it would have been better spent
We can joke about wewuzing, but 50 years from now they will teach this drivel.
Correct.
You've lost the culture war. You are allowed to exist because it's more satisfying for you to suffer than it is to kill you.
>50 years from now
They're teaching it now
And they will continue to do so. You have lost.
There are verified historical instances of Black people throughout British history, such as in the film Belle, starring Gugu Mbatha-Raw and Sarah Gadon.
we wuz brish rowy'alltea n shiet
Sarah Gadon is gorgeous!!
we wuh errytang
Based, (his)tory is a whitewash and it's time to set the record straight!
>black British history
Where do you think this communist revision of history will ultimately end when entitled 80 iq spawn of the brown imports look at ancient European statues and see nothing but white?
They'll just bulldoze it all.
Fucking idiots.
>They'll just bulldoze it all.
No. The British people want that. They won't have it.
That's already happening now
>when entitled 80 iq spawn of the brown imports look at ancient European statues and see nothing but white?
Did you forget the george floyd riots?
Did you know they were global?
Did you know destruction of statues was global too?
I remember hearing about a famous one in England, apparently a very rich man basically built one of their cities and he fought against slavery. Got his statue pulled down anyway.
oldfags will remember when "WE WUZ KANGZ" was a joke based on a tiny frothing at the mouth gorilla cult in the US.
that is evil must be completely destroyed the moment it pops its head up, not left to fester.
>that is evil must be completely destroyed the moment it pops its head up, not left to fester.
Agree.
Second Nuremberg asap. Death through slow torture as the only verdict.
Innocent men were tortured there.
the only bergs being executed will have precious materials at the start of their names
Imagine being Egyptian and having retarded subsaharan africans in America trying to claim your ancient leaders.
It's insane how dishonest libtards are
They have to lie because their views don't hold up to a simple check of reality. Liberals are literally going to end the human race
Britain needs to be destroyed. It's too far gone. Can only hope they get dragged so far into the Ukraine conflict that they get obliterated by nuclear strikes.
I don't know why you're arguing with someone who denies racial/special reality. DNA can, and has in the past, been able to show someone's racial makeup and can even right now approximate an image of the person through DNA.
And I do think the error people are having here is that they're accepting a position of words being material when they aren't. We could call "race" apples right now, but it wouldn't alter the reality. I also think people are afraid to concede that humans aren't exempt from physiological genetic manifestations, as though we're so special.
tl;dr stop even arguing with someone so far gone because all you'll get is tennis between metaphysical and material remarks
Race is not real. You argue because you know this and can't win.
>DNA can, and has in the past, been able to show someone's racial makeu
It cannot.
>And I do think the error people are having here is that they're accepting a position of words being material when they aren't.
Incorrect. This is not a matter of words. There is no such thing as race. It's a total fantasy. You could call a apple a orange and it would still be a apple. You could call race a spade and it still wouldn't be real.
>no, define species.
a set of animals or plants in which the members have similar characteristics to each other and can breed with each other:
>Race is not real
And neither are not breeds, right?
>a set of animals or plants in which the members have similar characteristics to each other and can breed with each other:
And thats an imperfect taxonomic classification, as there are distinct species which can produce fertile hybrid offspring like zonkeys and ligers
>look sinilar
not a definition, it is completely subjective of whether something looks similar to another.
there is no such thing as species. animals are a spectrum, and there are no clear distinctions between them.
prove a cat isn't a dog. go ahead, I'll wait
Why can't a definition be subjective?
What is "flat"? Is it flat if it's a little bumpy? Is it flat if it's curved but perfectly smooth? Since perfect flatness is impossible does that mean nothing is flat?
so you agree, species don't exist and it is entirely subjective like whether someone likes a song or not.
glad that's settled now
No, I don't agree. Species do exist even if it's somewhat subjective. A grey area existing doesn't mean the black and White don't exist.
>No, I don't agree. Species do exist even if it's somewhat subjective. A grey area existing doesn't mean the black and White don't exist
so what you are saying is that whites and blacks are different species.
glad that's settled.
>so what you are saying is that whites and blacks are different species.
Yes.
I'm not the original guy you were arguing with, I started with
>Why can't a definition be subjective?
that wasn't very useful then.
delete your last post so all future readers for generations to come read it as being the same poster
> DNA can't show racial makeup.
You're honestly a stupid person.
> Orange != Apple because an apple is an apple.
> Race doesn't exists because its just a 'fantasy' system humans have used to show quantifiable differences between each other.
By your same logic, the difference between an apple and an orange is a fantasy, because they're both fruits.
> You can't show someone's racial makeup by DNA
So dumb.
I think he's just israeli and doing his typical multi-culturalism subversion.
Funny how trannies are so invested in denying certain biological realities
We wuzz Excalihood n shieet
I believe it. White Brits are weak breeding stock for men if Allah.
Doesn't this mean that blacks should apologize for colonialism?
Education prior to 2016:
> Black people invented peanut butter.
> Chinamen invented fireworks.
> White people invented everything else.
Post-2016:
> Black women put a white man on the moon.
> Black people ruled Egypt
> Black people were members of the European aristocracy.
> Black people built Stonehenge.
> Black people invented video games.
> The US was founded when the first black people landed.
What happened?
it's because they found out that peanut butter had been around for tens of thousands of years in south america, which is where peanuts came from in the first place.
then they chimped out and started laying claim to everything else.
i prefer it in the 60s when they were still having tea parties in zoos for public amusement, and nothing else.
Pendulum swung back and broke the clock.
>You seriously want me to believe they thought that black guy was just like them
Discrimination happened, but it was not racial or ethnic because neither existed yet.
>What's a scientist?
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/scientist
>It can and has.
it can accurately predict self-reported race, according to this article. Which does not mean that race is real for the same reason that, say, if somebody claims they were a fairy they were not actually a fairy.
You literally don't even understand what a self learning AI is.
Or are you going to claim somebody self reporting as a woman is actually a woman now?
>You haven't edited his genes, so no.
There are no bantu genes. There are no genetic patterns tied to being a Bantu. Therefore, nothing has to be edited. It is purely memetic.
>That isn't the process needed to turn someone into a bantu.
It is. Because there is zero genetic link tied to the purely memetic idea of being a bantu.
>They do.
They do not. It is a purely western idea that has been mostly discredited and was never accepted by most of the world.
>but they will never be their race let alone their ethnic group.
They have no concept of race. Therefore it's a non issue.
>Pendulum swung back
this implies that there is more than one truth. Even if history is lies agreed upon, reality doesn't change.
>this implies that there is more than one truth.
You are forgetting the other possibility: Both are wrong.
>How did they know who to discriminate against?
Language, religion, just not being as rich and strong as them, legal status. Plenty of ways.
>they're defined in a dictionary
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/fairy
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/god
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/demon
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/elf
>If it doesn't exist yet is accurately predicted, does it just read the patients mind?
You literally don't understand what a predictive AI actually does, right?
>How can it tell what race the patient is if the race doesn't exist?
Because people feed it information and it uses that information to make decisions.
>the other person is also predicting their own race and funnily enough they both come to the same conclusion about 90% of the time
Which means nothing because it's based on a idea that is not real.
>I can guarantee I know more than you do on the subject.
Clearly you do not. You literally don't even understand the fundamental means by which it works.
>He would be identified as a man.
The AI would identify them as a women if it was input the right information.
>Of course there are.
No, there aren't. Which I know because you will, without fail, not mention any of them.
>Why do you keep lying so blatantly?
I am not, you are just mentally ill.
>Then why did you say you had to take physical steps to turn your cat into transportation equipment?
Because that is not memetic, therefore it requires actual physical steps.
>Language, religion, just not being as rich and strong as them, legal status. Plenty of ways.
Yeah, no.
>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/fairy
>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/god
>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/demon
>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/elf
So you admit that if something meets those definitions they are those things?
Thanks for admitting race and ethnicity is real.
>You literally don't understand what a predictive AI actually does, right?
I do, you however don't.
>Because people feed it information and it uses that information to make decisions.
During training, sure. There's clearly a correlation if it's that accurate after training.
>Which means nothing because it's based on a idea that is not real.
And yet it can predict it with >90% accuracy.
>The AI would identify them as a women if it was input the right information.
The mentally ill input wrong information, he would be detected as a man.
>I am not, you are just mentally ill.
t. mentally ill man who won't stop lying.
>Because that is not memetic, therefore it requires actual physical steps.
Of course it's memetic. It's an arbitrary characterization, just like race and ethnicity. But that characterization references something real.
>Discrimination happened, but it was not racial or ethnic
How did they know who to discriminate against?
>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/scientist
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/ethnicity
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/race (scroll down a bit).
They're defined in a dictionary, yet you say they don't exist.
>it can accurately predict self-reported race, according to this article. Which does not mean that race is real for the same reason that, say, if somebody claims they were a fairy they were not actually a fairy.
If it doesn't exist yet is accurately predicted, does it just read the patients mind? How can it tell what race the patient is if the race doesn't exist? It predicts it by observing small differences, the other person is also predicting their own race and funnily enough they both come to the same conclusion about 90% of the time - even when clinical experts aren't able to.
>You literally don't even understand what a self learning AI is.
I can guarantee I know more than you do on the subject.
>Or are you going to claim somebody self reporting as a woman is actually a woman now?
He would be identified as a man.
>There are no bantu genes. There are no genetic patterns tied to being a Bantu.
Of course there are.
>They do not. It is a purely western idea that has been mostly discredited and was never accepted by most of the world.
Why do you keep lying so blatantly?
>Correct. They are all the same.
Then why did you say you had to take physical steps to turn your cat into transportation equipment? If it was all memetic then you would've said "My cat is now a transportation equipment because I say so". But you didn't say that. You admitted that a transportation equipment has certain qualities that need to be met, despite "transportation equipment" being a made up concept.
reminder that there is no such thing as species and it is a cultural concept.
most languages don't have words for different species, and some don't even have words at all.
some have the same word for dog as rabbit, because they are the same species.
Lies.