What went wrong?

What went wrong?

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Leo isn't cute anymore

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Twinks age like milk into weird androgynous features.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      In this film and in that recent Adam McKay dogshit they still have moments that imply he's handsome even though his shit looks fucked up, it's slightly embarrassing.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >white men bad for 200 minutes
    quite the mystery

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They were bad

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It says a lot that you identify with the group of people killing innocent people for their wealth, just based on their complexion

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Stop being a fag

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You would actually be one of those psychos killing Osage Indians

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Jesse Plemons is practically the hero of the story and he's white. Fuck off already you perpetually angry culture war homosexual.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Threadly reminder that this fag hasn’t seen the movie and has been ranting non-stop about muh white man bad.
      For what it’s worth, in the movie:
      >they call out the bad guys (Leo his bro and his uncle) for being literal greedy israelites more than once
      >indians are called savages by the whites several times
      >its a good movie that doesn’t seem to take sides. It’s a true story.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Gamergate was almost a decade ago. People need to move on.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It came too late. 2012-2019 was Peak Woke. "Whitey Bad" was a novelty of the Obama/Trump years. Now people are sick of it. They wouldn't have minded a procedural thriller about the Osage killings, but Scorsese and Roth recontextualized it for modern racial messaging and undermined any artistic merit it might have had otherwise.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >They wouldn't have minded a procedural thriller about the Osage killings, but Scorsese and Roth recontextualized it for modern racial messaging and undermined any artistic merit it might have had otherwise.
      I would've preferred if he had pushed the limits a little bit and used the Osage murders in a broader context, showing the history of the Osage and how brutal and land-grabbing they were towards other tribes, and then how they got the same treatment from the whites who came later.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >implying
      this movie sucks ass
      people would be clowning this shit ending years ago

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It’s too long

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Plemons was meant to play Leo's character and vice versa. watching Leo frown for 3 hours wasn't really engaging enough, he can't carry that kind of unsympathetic protagonist role.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nothing we haven’t see before, washed up actors, poor score/pacing and run time far too long. I’ll forget this film by tomorrow.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wish i was rich off of oil

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >based off the book with the subtitle “the birth of the FBI”
    >the movie has hardly anything to do with the FBI
    pretty disappointing. was expecting some government stuff about the department getting formed, how they recruit and how they solve cases. jesse plemons character is an FBI agent in name only. he could have easily been sent by the state or a good cop.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It WAS supposed to be about that, but Scorsese realized he was making the movie about a "bunch of white guys", given the subject matter.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >DiCaprio sucked
      he was initially set to play the FBI agent
      I wonder if Jesse Plemons was supposed to play DiCaprio's midwit character. He would be a better fit.

      I was thinking about how the film probably would’ve focused more on the FBI perspective had Leo played Tom White.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Deniro and Gladstone were great, DiCaprio sucked

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >DiCaprio sucked
      he was initially set to play the FBI agent
      I wonder if Jesse Plemons was supposed to play DiCaprio's midwit character. He would be a better fit.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    As someone who read the book ahead and thought it put the facts in a pretty intriguing way, Marty completely fucked up and let the movie meander all over the place. The movie just felt sanitary as all fuck and I'm mad I didn't get my emotional thriller or my FBIkino.
    3 and a half hours and the old fuck has to run on screen and do a quick summary to get it out the door.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      lol the 2 you haven't seen are his worst
      new york, new york is especially bad
      t. someone who watched scorsese's entire filmography chronologically in 2022

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Based Casino enjoyer. Plus yeah I liked KOTFM but being besides Gangs of new york is pretty reasonable.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This poster is really offputting. DiCaprio's little frowny mouth upsets me, it looks like that of a child trying to act tough. I should know

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    An hour too long. The "who dunnit" is predictable pretty quickly. Leonardo is playing a dumb character but he plays it as some sort of weird performance, "i'm le bad guy but um i'm crying inside because i think i'm good".
    The indian girl being the "silent judge" for the whole film is a weak and easy trick.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >What went wrong?
    Everyone was a credulous retard.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    nobody outside USA cares about american natives enough to sit through this long ass movie

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I even enjoyed it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      white european left wingers, especially women, love to feel bad about white people bullying natives but nobody knew about the movie until after it came out and reviewers said it was good. Also Leo seems to be box office poison after the revenant around here. It's the type of movie that everyone would watch and praise if it was on netflix but nobody will buy a ticket to see

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Women don't care for historical slogfests with old men. They prefer horror, fantasy, and female protagonists. The only audience for this film is old, white, college lefties.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    cynical anti american slop #4360

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >anti american
      aren't Indians the only true Americans ?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        America is literally the name of a white man anon

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The true Americans were the colonizers. America didn't exist when the natives were still murdering each others.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >America didn't exist when the natives were still murdering each others.
          so it started existing when colonizers started murdering them.

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I loved it. A masterwork of how it doesn't matter how long a movie is long as you're invested.

    I felt so much for Lilly Gladstone's character. She was phenomenal. The movie is fun, intriguing, involving, horrific, revolting, emotional, spiritual, invites reflection and ends on a very topical note. I thought it was superb. Better than Oppenheimer. Nolan is Nolan. All of his movies have characters that feel like robots. He doesn't know how to portray humans. Scorsese does. The characters in this movie, their relationships, the scenes, even the exposition all feels natural and human. No cringy "i have become death" sex scene. Instead we have actual intimacy and feel the love, growing hate, evil and moral dilemmas of the people involved.

    I had never heard of Lilly Gladstone before but holy shit, she was simply incredible. DiCaprio delivers one of the best perfomances of his career as well. This movie was fucking great and I feel terrible for that woman, those people and the horrible things that still happen to this day with systemic genocide ny dehumanizing people and protecting those who slaughter them. Scorsese's respect for the Osage was tangible and the movie made me want to learn more about them. This has been a good year for movies, even better considering Marvel and DC are both taking it up the ass now at the box office.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is either a bot or was written by an AI. Either way, I hope you got paid shilling this slop on this god forsaken site

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    He hasn't made a good movie since GoodFellas

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Scorsese has always been a hack.

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >you like em red?

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I want to see it but I literally cannot sit in a theater for 3.5hrs without having to get up and pee at least once unless I water fast all day

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is this movie entertaining, or is it pretentious?

    Example of pretentious: Oppenheimer.
    I like Scorsese's Goodfellas and The Wolf of Wall Street because they're entertaining, so that's why I'm considering see it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      it's not horrible but it's just ridiculously long, it's legitimately AT LEAST an hour too long. I'd just wait until it's out on Apple+ in a month or two

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Oh so just like The Irishman

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Scorsese legend is only what it is because the video essay neckbeards of YouTube are aping each others praise as a status symbol. He no longer understands direction, pacing, editing, music, character or story…just tropes about the least interesting forms of human interaction…manipulation. The movie is lazy and stupid.

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >DeNiro in current year-20

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I never even saw it advertised. Did they not pay to inject it into people's algorithm?

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    nothing. you're just contrarians

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It was an easy 10/10

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Literally only older white people watch serious dramas. If you want to shit on crackers for 3 hours you need a lot more CGI to keep the brownoids entertained that long.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *