fpbp
The only one that was close to acceptable was TLW and that was really only on a conceptual level. The legal fallout of the events of the first movie and corporations/poachers trying to get their hands on the remaining dinosaurs is a neat idea and a T-rex roaming around a city at least makes for a fun schlocky blockbuster sequence, but that's where the positive ended, the movie still shouldn't have been made. Everything after that has just been throwbacks and rehashing the high points of the original over and over again but with somehow increasingly worse special effects.
lost world had good action and the raptors in the fields is kino but spinosaurus was better and whoever decided to remove the spino from the JP3 logo and covers can forever burn in hell eating dicks every day
Aw shit I forgot about the raptors in the field. I remember seeing that in the theater and getting Goosebumps because I was so freaked out. Fricking gold.
lost world had good action and the raptors in the fields is kino but spinosaurus was better and whoever decided to remove the spino from the JP3 logo and covers can forever burn in hell eating dicks every day
Shit, I also forgot >people hiding from t-rex in a cave behind a waterfall >snake slithers onto guy's shoulder >guy freaks out and runs out of the waterfall >waterfall just turns red
Maybe I need to rewarch that movie
Lost World is just a bunch of “wouldn’t this be epic?” moments, but there is no attention given to the characters or story to make any of those epic moments make sense.
Yes and no. Nick Van Owen's character is motivated through his ties to GreenPeace to disrupt any human interference with the islands animals and ecosystems. Sarah Harding is there because she out of everyone Hammond sends is the most qualified to bring back information that he wants to know about, InGen is there as antagonists to the heroes and threat to the dinosaurs showcasing the worst of human presence with the animals, and this is all before we even get to Rolan Tembo and why he's there and he's arguably probably the best part of that movie.
Malcolm was there as a tie-in to the previous film, even more so than the cameo of Ellie and Tim. He was out of place with his girlfriend being there sure, but his adopted daughter who is black and does gymnastics shows up to. It threw off the needed family dynamic.
fpbp
The only one that was close to acceptable was TLW and that was really only on a conceptual level. The legal fallout of the events of the first movie and corporations/poachers trying to get their hands on the remaining dinosaurs is a neat idea and a T-rex roaming around a city at least makes for a fun schlocky blockbuster sequence, but that's where the positive ended, the movie still shouldn't have been made. Everything after that has just been throwbacks and rehashing the high points of the original over and over again but with somehow increasingly worse special effects.
Everything would've been fine if they just followed Crichton's sequel story. He basically wrote a screenplay in novel form. It was all island-based, too. Lush jungle shit, extremely adventerous, unhinged, and a bunch of the shit sequels still stole unused setpieces from it.
I hate Spielberg to the bone for what he did to TLW. The OG outline would have easily rivaled the first movie, and like with Alien/Aliens could've been a near-perfect duology.
>Everything would've been fine if they just followed Crichton's sequel story
they could never have done that, in the original both ian malcolm and dr hammond died.
I mean not really, the only real retcon was Malcom not dying and even his death had only been a small bit at the end of the first novel so that wasn't huge, the big thing was that it just felt like Crichton wasn't really trying as hard as he normally did, which to be fair he probably wasn't since he only did it because the studio begged him too and he mostly used it to shore up plot holes in the first book
I'm not talking about the consistencies with the first novel or even with the film, I'm explicitly stating that The Lost World novel itself was made (forced) with the first film in mind.
Hammond's role was irrelevant whether dead or alive and Ian Malcolm survived and was the lead. Crichton did a 'slight' retcon with him; he was on the brink of death, but didn't die.
The Lost World movie is no masterpiece, but the novel is trash, and I say that as the biggest Crichton mark on the planet. It's far and away the worst thing he ever wrote.
I'm absolutely no fan of a generic adventure novel that feels like something written solely out of a contractual obligation. It's an extremely lazy rehash, and the evolutionary theory/triggers of extinction events stuff that takes the place of the ethics of genetic engineering and chaos theory of the first novel is very hollow in comparison. Clearly Crichton recognising he can't JUST write about dinosaurs chasing motorbikes and scrambling for something that sort of looks like the meatier content of the first novel if you really squint at it. I quite like a few individual scenes, the stuff in the rex nest is absolute gold, but a few great standalone moments don't make for a great novel.
I don't care if he was a moneybawd, because without fail, all the best scenes come straight out of the novel, and all the shit parts are Spielberg's own bullshit.
The hunter, the two T-rexes, the trailer on the cliff, raptors in tall grass (and a motorcycle setpiece chase therein that makes sense, but unfilmed), NO ballerina bullshit, NO king kong-trash, just the leads vs in-gen corporates on a jungle island with dinos running in the wild. It would've been great for a movie.
I'd say there are enough good ideas in The Lost World to consider it a good book but it for sure was a shadow of Jurassic Park and definitely felt like the contractual obligation it was. It pretty much read like a screenplay in novel form.
Over reliance on cgi and weaponising raptors. JP 3 is pretty crap but its short and the spino was cool.
Oh yeah all the characters after the first are boring cardboard cutouts
Thematically and tonally the whole series is a mess. Paradoxically the new ones are more consistent in that regard and actually deliver the idea of messing with nature in a bad way much better because everything happens because of genetic monsters they cook up from zero. Sure they also consistently suck, but thematically are what the series should have gone towards after the first one.
I dunno, in hindsight it's a really weird series when you think about it. The first one is a milestone in cinema, but isn't perfect either (mainly the kids, they are fundamental for Alan's character but are incredibly obnoxious).
>mainly the kids, they are fundamental for Alan's character >he warms up to children by the end >every subsequent movie shows Alan and Dr. Sadler separated and childless
I think it's a bad case of the mindset that plagues modern Hollywood >make movie >characters go through a clear character arc and come out changed >movie is a success >producers/investors: "Nice! Now do the exact same thing again!"
At this point Dr. Grant has been struggling with the possibility of having kids for 30 fricking years. They don't care about growth, they care about repeating the successful formula over and over again until it stops turning a profit.
This.
The idea of raptors being intelligent or at least more intelligent than primates was established in 3 and training or at least measuring that level of intellect with them is a neat idea on paper, but to then have Chris frickin' Pratt show up with his StarLord tier acting playing with CG actors and geeks flopping around in bluescreen outfits in front of him and the smartest raptor is color coded, its like...
I feel like I'm the only one that likes the concept of "trained" raptors and raptor handlers. World dropped the ball making it all about action but in a better movie I think the concept could have been very well handled. Imagine a whole area of the park where you get to see raptors run obstacle courses as an attraction and an educational display of their intellect.
Yeah, I mean they're not dinosaurs, they're theme park monsters. And so, its not uncommon to think of the idea of getting them to do stuff like seeing if say a triceratops can do what we can train an elephant to do, instead of just letting them go eat and shit in the safari paddock with the rest of the moronic pachyosaurs and duckbills.
I personally liked the idea of the second one and exploring ruins of other installations Hammond had set up. 2 was fun for the thrill of seeing a dinosaur in a city, but there were five islands he purchased with Isla Sorna and Nublar being the major ones. I'm curious what else could be happening and what other junk was left behind on the other three islands. Moving into more populated areas for the films is a mistake. Keeping it in that jungle environment is what made those movies special cause it added to the idea we were back in the time of dinosaurs on a deeper psychological level.
I'd have liked trained raptors if it had been the sole focus of the movie as the theme park attraction. Think of orcas and their trainers. Or actual birds of prey and their handlers. I thought the nu trilogy's progression should have been >train in park >attempt at training military if you absolutely had to >seeing training hold up once they've gone back into the wild
Maybe even film it in the style of a documentary District 9 style.
Since dinosaurs can't talk, the kino potential was always very low. Compare it to the Planet of the Apes movies which have some similarities, but since the monkeys can actually talk and engage with the human characters there's a lot more potential. Jurassic Park could only ever be a boring version of zombies.
>Since dinosaurs can't talk
JP3 was all about how the raptors could communicate with each other and it was how their pack attack tactics worked
alan fricking 3d printed the bone that made it work
Reminder that the original concept for JP3 was supposed to revolve around dinosaur-human hybrids that were supersoldiers firing laser guns or some shit, and was dropped because they realized that was just way too stupid.
Also reminder that the original Planet of the Apes had like 10 sequels that all fricking sucked ass wayyyy beyond even the worst JP sequel. The whole appeal of Jurassic Park is humans surviving against a form of nature that we've simply never encountered before. Not zombies or aliens or mutants, but simple-minded apex predators from far beyond our time.
>Also reminder that the original Planet of the Apes had like 10 sequels that all fricking sucked ass wayyyy beyond even the worst JP sequel.
Conquest is better than any JP film.
The new Apes trilogy was legitimately good, wdym? Precisely because they could do more with the monkeys than just "grr monkey mad monkey wanna kill". The new Jurassic world movies are fricking garbage because there isn't much you can do with angry lizards.
it wasn't meant to advance the overarching plot, it was always a b movie side adventure starring dr grant
I actually enjoy the first two of the nu-trilogy as decent popcorn flicks but the third is a badly made film. Completely unwatchable garbage. Reboots that bring back original cast members are invariably cringe
god no. jurassic world is one of the worst fricking films i've ever seen, it's just a step below the star wars sequels. didn't even bother with fallen kingdom or dominion.
You like 3 but hate World? Frick JWFK and JWD but World was good, 3 is about as good as JWFK/D
Dr. Grant goes to the other island and survives a bunch of new dinosaurs. It's not that hard to understand.
It embraces the whack scenario and is just an adventure flick. Much better than all of the other sequels being exactly that but still trying to pose as some deep reflection on humans and nature.
JPIII is the RE3 to TLW's RE2.
Jurassic Park 3 is a film about cuckolding. Remember the themes of the former films? Life finds a way, survival, hubris of man, etc. Well now... >entire premise of the movie is about a cuck (William H. Macey) saving his kid from his wife's frickbuddy >Grant is a cuck, his entire arc from the previous films retconned, he even has to have dinner with Ellie's new boyfriend and their kid and then desperately has to call Ellie for her military boyfriend to come save him >mercenaries jobbed and cucked, don't do anything but cry and get eaten >t-rex the franchise mascot cucked >raptors are all cucks with a female alpha >ceratosaurus mogged and cucked by piles of feces >even spino gets cucked, no climactic end sequence, just gets scared off by another cuck William H. Macey with a flare gun...
And the audience are the biggest cucks for having to sit through all this only for the movie to abruptly stop without a climax or conclusion and the army just shows up and everyone bails. Was the final 40 minutes of film left on the cutting room floor for budget reasons or what? JW2gays are less cucked.
But anyway, yeah. JP3 is one big pile of shit.
Oh it's dogshit man, I'm not arguing with you. I just really like the design of the Spinosaurus. Also, as an isolated scene on it's own the pterodactyl cage scene was pretty dope. honestly too good for that movie.
I liked the spinosaurus and all the toys/merch/games I just couldnt sit through the movie, after the spino/rex battle nothing else happens
Idk why people circlejerk over the pteranodon scene, it was alright but ultimately kind of stupid, like Billy gets killed who gives a frick about him or any of these people I hope they all die, Udesky was probably the best character
>Grant is a cuck, his entire arc from the previous films retconned
Grant and Ellie weren't romantically involved.
1 year ago
Anonymous
TLDR homie
And Grant wasn't in a relationship with that b***h, ever. Them getting together in the last movie was the writers finally giving in on all the gays shipping them together for the past thirty years.
>Grant and Ellie weren't in talks about having children and taking it to the next level but Grant was afraid of commitment until he went on the harrowing journey with the children and realized the importance of life
You troons are complete fricking schitzos.
>Idk why people circlejerk over the pteranodon scene, it was alright but ultimately kind of stupid
It's actually a really good scene, as far as tension and mood goes but I'm with you on the Billy thing. I couldn't have cared less about him and his safety.
when he leapt with the parachute and it was playing this intense opera music I was like "......." that guy did not earn that at all, and Idek why he did that in the first place
1 year ago
Anonymous
and Ellie weren't in talks about having children and taking it to the next level but Grant was afraid of commitment until he went on the harrowing journey with the children and realized the importance of life
Post a link to when this is actually stated or stfu
1 year ago
Anonymous
Grant and Ellie weren't romantically involved, you can clearly tell in the first movie. They're close colleagues.
Everything you just wrote is actually headcanon.
WTF they were literally talking about whether they wanted to have kids together or not and Ellie refers to Grant with pet names like "honey" etc.
Are you baiting me?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Trying to find the dialogue but it seems YouTube doesn't have that exact skit afaik. But honestly I think you are seeing too much into it. They were completely asexual towards eachother, if they were together they'd have kissed at least fricking once.
1 year ago
Anonymous
No, you're not being baited. You simply put too much importance and read way too deep into Alan and Ellie's relationship like some shippergay.
And no, they weren't talking about having kids together. This is also the same conversation where she addresses him as Dr. Grant.
They were in the first movie. JPIII made the ex-couple which kind of ruins the development in the first movie and Dominion made them a couple again. Pandering that I can't be angry about.
No, they were not.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Let me guess, you believe Rugratz was all Angelica's fever dream while she was being raped by Stu or some shit?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Grant and Ellie weren't romantically involved, you can clearly tell in the first movie. They're close colleagues.
Everything you just wrote is actually headcanon.
1 year ago
Anonymous
They were in the first movie. JPIII made the ex-couple which kind of ruins the development in the first movie and Dominion made them a couple again. Pandering that I can't be angry about.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Dominion made them a couple again. Pandering that I can't be angry about.
That was the worst part. If they turned Grant into a cuck for no reason in 3 the least they could do is make him a bitter old man who doesn't care about Ellie and is just obsessed with his work, but instead they rewrote him as living a miserable life of daydreaming about the life he never had with ellie and they make fun of him for never having children the whole movie
No, you're not being baited. You simply put too much importance and read way too deep into Alan and Ellie's relationship like some shippergay.
And no, they weren't talking about having kids together. This is also the same conversation where she addresses him as Dr. Grant.
[...]
No, they were not.
Men aren't women, you will never be a woman, etc. Grant even makes a joke about their sex life to Malcom. Fricking have a nice day, please.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Grant makes a joke about their sex life
No, he fricking doesn't. All he does is say they're together when Malcolm asks, and even then Grant says it in a fashion that's protective of Ellie because he knows Malcolm is a sleazeball looking to pump and dump her.
Let me guess, you believe Rugratz was all Angelica's fever dream while she was being raped by Stu or some shit?
Is that the cartoon equivalent of thinking Alan and Ellie were an item?
https://youtu.be/jsoQzBLkA1g?t=117
clearly engaged
>Ellie throwing in a quip to clearly tease Alan about his aversion to kids means they have the hots for each other
1 year ago
Anonymous
lots of mental gymnastics for this schitzo headcannon you have
1 year ago
Anonymous
Very few words for this non rebuttal you have.
1 year ago
Anonymous
there is no rebuttal, you're a schitzo and you're handwaving everything that has to do with their relationship because... (???) you're a schitzo just trying to shitpost? Idk
1 year ago
Anonymous
You ok?
1 year ago
Anonymous
I'm not handwaving anything. I'm going off exactly what the movie presented me. I'm not the one who put unwarranted importance on their relationship in the first place (for whatever reason, when the movie didn't even do this) only to go into JPIII with some shipgay mentality and get butthurt because Alan-kun didn't confess his undying love to Ellie-chan.
Unlike you I understand the nuances of a friendly but professional relationship between a man and a woman.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>shipgay mentality
YWNBAW
1 year ago
Anonymous
Good, because only a woman would get upset that their OTP didn't happen.
1 year ago
Anonymous
no one knows what you're talking about, dilate, men aren't women, the holocaust didn't happen, Christ is King, etc.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Christ is King and you're a moron.
1 year ago
Anonymous
?t=117
clearly engaged
1 year ago
Anonymous
>gets close and makes a sex joke
If you actually believe that that constitutes as rock solid evidence of them being an item even though they don't even accidentally kiss even once throughout the whole movie, I compel you to leave your house asap and seek sexual intercourse with a femal of your species. Now.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Grant makes a joke about their sex life
No, he fricking doesn't. All he does is say they're together when Malcolm asks, and even then Grant says it in a fashion that's protective of Ellie because he knows Malcolm is a sleazeball looking to pump and dump her.
[...]
Is that the cartoon equivalent of thinking Alan and Ellie were an item?
[...] >Ellie throwing in a quip to clearly tease Alan about his aversion to kids means they have the hots for each other
It more she called him honey
1 year ago
Anonymous
And? There are more times she addresses him formally.
You think someone snarkily calling you sweetie means they're flirting with you?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Nowadays a literal chatbot has a better understanding of language and its usage than you.
TLDR homie
And Grant wasn't in a relationship with that b***h, ever. Them getting together in the last movie was the writers finally giving in on all the gays shipping them together for the past thirty years.
>Idk why people circlejerk over the pteranodon scene, it was alright but ultimately kind of stupid
It's actually a really good scene, as far as tension and mood goes but I'm with you on the Billy thing. I couldn't have cared less about him and his safety.
It embraces the whack scenario and is just an adventure flick. Much better than all of the other sequels being exactly that but still trying to pose as some deep reflection on humans and nature.
Oh it's dogshit man, I'm not arguing with you. I just really like the design of the Spinosaurus. Also, as an isolated scene on it's own the pterodactyl cage scene was pretty dope. honestly too good for that movie.
I actually enjoy the first two of the nu-trilogy as decent popcorn flicks but the third is a badly made film. Completely unwatchable garbage. Reboots that bring back original cast members are invariably cringe
I honestly think FK got a lot of undeserved shit. It was a lot more refreshing than JW with what they did with the story and setting. People focused too much on its worst parts which are indeed bad but for what it is, I think it was fine. The third one was pure nostalgia wanking. A couple cool ideas but its a travesty that the final boss of this franchise are fricking grasshoppers.
Looking at them all lined up, those emblems are kind of a good indication of their movies. >Fleshed out original >Rough copy >oh shit, what are you doing >The first one again with less effort >even less effort and it's falling apart >frick it, burn the thing down, nobody cares
no, it begged for a sequel and TLW was it, it just could have been better
IMO JW was the most logical example of a third movie, finally see the park up and running but it all comes crashing down
What dinosaur could they have done after Spino?
Personally, I would have liked a film where the main dino stalking the group would be two Carnotaurus that can camouflage.
All said and done, the rex destroying the cars was kind of a weak scene. I've seen webms of rhinos obliterating a jeep in seconds, a rex would shatter a car to tiny bits with a nudge.
I like to drive my Mercedes-Benz while listening to my Sony Walkman on my Beats By Dre headphones to the dinosaur park. When I get there I am very thirsty so enjoy a nice cold can of Coca Cola while calling my friend from my Sony Phone. I then head to the raptor enclosure but a big burly man wearing Timberland Boots rides past me on his Triumph Motorcycle which makes me drop my $20 Ben and Jerry's. An annoying zoomer is playing music from his Bose speaker while I wait in queue for the raptors, my feet hurt I wish I had a pair of timberlands. After the raptors I get hungry so check my Samsung smart watch and sure enough it's lunch time, I walk over to Yoshinoya and enjoy some over priced japanese food while watching movie trailers on the big Imax screen in the street. After all those carbs I start to feel sleepy so grab a Starbucks Iced Latte and do a little shopping at Pandora before heading back to my Hilton Hotel King-sized Suite. Phew what a day
I mean, dinosaurs are always going to be cool to kids and they are always going to sell. Always. The problem with JP is that every other movie featuring dinosaurs that came before it was now obsolete and every other dinosaur movie that came after it had to live up to the standards that movie set. It was THAT big and it had within its production the literal best of the best the movie industry had. Editing, production, computer effects and animatronics; it was ALL there. And most importantly, it was all grounded in a very believable and realistic story. The second one came out and it built upon the previous film. The third one was good because it had the barebones of the previous two crews, giving props to Joe Johnston on his first director attempt, but by then the budget wasn't as big, the competition in theatres was huge and even though they had Sam Neill and Tea Leoni, she didn't have the right haircut. Regardless, that first run of those movies ensured that whatever dinosaur product you saw on the toy shelves had the Jurassic Park logo on it and every toy they had were real dinosaurs species with the distinct JP artstyle. Kids will always find dinosaurs to be cool, so you will always have toys sold.
I didn't see the last two but I did see the reboot in theatres. Nothing against Bryce cause she is absolutely gorgeous and its great Vincent D'onofrio got a role as a bad guy he played flawlessly, but shooting it on digital ruined the feel of the environments and overusing CG where it was a treat for the original is a place to start. I saw it in 3D and when that scene of the sick dinosaur showed up for that callback to the first movie, I could see the edge of the digital element composite sticking out like sore thumb from the rest of the scene and background. Amateurish things like that would have never flown in the first, never mind other two movies. It had drifted so far from the original premise the novel set for the first movie while aping that film throughout,.
Your erection and penis in general is in no way conducive to whether Tea Leoni's hairstyle in JPIII was suitable and fitting for her. The pixie cut could have firt for any other role but stood out like a sore thumb in Jurassic Park.
Tea Leoni was only there because she sucked off Steven Spielberg for her role in Deep Impact. He gave her a role in JP3 to return the favor and to keep her mouth shut (while not around his wiener)
Eeeeewww.....
Imagine looking up to see googly eyed bespectacled Steven Spielberg rolling his head around and signing because his shrivelled cheesy smelling mutilated vinegar tasting schlong is in your mouth all for the privelege of sharing the screen with William H. Macy.
I don't think I've ever cringed harder at anything than when the clone girl jumped forward with no buildup to do the hand thing like it was some heroic passing the torch thing.
>only one guy ever was eaten trying the same thing the point being he didn't have a bond >it just werks on every single other dino for anyone in the protag role no matter what
Fricking How to Train Your Dragon did the same thing and I hated it.
The Spinosaurus was probably attracted to large amounts of it, not a small vial-full he probably sprinkled around the perimeter of his tanker to keep other prying dinosaurs away at the faintest scent of an apex.
I used to visit lost-world.com on my old Pentium II machine. I was really bummed when the website finally went down in 2020. I need to get around to downloading it off the waybackmachine and host it locally.
Boomer risk aversion = IP churn unto death. With 3 they had something to play with. >oh god, rapid evolution what the frick is going on: dino zombies? oh god oh frick we have to kill them all before they become sentient >eco-terrorist bleeding hearts and nihilistic end times cultists working against this >Militaries want to control and use it against their better judgement, or initiate premptive MAD contingency plans because it's all going off the rails >weather modification technology has to go public to freeze out the lizard c**ts >sorry folks, but everyone's going to get hairier, especially women
Incapability to read the fear in the air and the trajectory of current trends in the public's mind, or how that would play juggling archetypes. Dinos will never be not cool, and it's a testament to their lack of imagination and storycraft that they've driven the franchise into such mid depths.
Jurassic Park felt like we were seeing the demise of the greatest iteration of DisneyLand to never exist, the greatest theme park that COULD ever exist. 'Live real dinosaurs' is a tagline for a product you can sell to the entire human race. Its very idea would become something of a cultural milestone in someones life whether or not they went to Jurassic Park at some point. Literally on the cusp of opening and world wide acclaim, we just so happened to took the pre-opening tour with the other visitors and watched it all go to hell.
I really dig all the fan art that's come out since conceptualizing what the park could have been like.
I don't know the name of it off by heart, but a fan made game covering just that is on its way. It looks like a chill stroll through the setting and adds a few places we didn't see. It will be on Steam soon.
They decided to make movies after the first one
this but the third
also spielberg forced crichton to write a sequel novel to adapt rather than simply have him write a screenplay
Basica b***h casual conventinal wisdom wrong opinion homie
fpbp
The only one that was close to acceptable was TLW and that was really only on a conceptual level. The legal fallout of the events of the first movie and corporations/poachers trying to get their hands on the remaining dinosaurs is a neat idea and a T-rex roaming around a city at least makes for a fun schlocky blockbuster sequence, but that's where the positive ended, the movie still shouldn't have been made. Everything after that has just been throwbacks and rehashing the high points of the original over and over again but with somehow increasingly worse special effects.
>with somehow increasingly worse special effects.
Maybe once World came around, but TLW and JPIII has some of the best special effects in the series.
lost world had good action and the raptors in the fields is kino but spinosaurus was better and whoever decided to remove the spino from the JP3 logo and covers can forever burn in hell eating dicks every day
Aw shit I forgot about the raptors in the field. I remember seeing that in the theater and getting Goosebumps because I was so freaked out. Fricking gold.
Shit, I also forgot
>people hiding from t-rex in a cave behind a waterfall
>snake slithers onto guy's shoulder
>guy freaks out and runs out of the waterfall
>waterfall just turns red
Maybe I need to rewarch that movie
That was a cool effect, still laughably moronic how it happens, though.
I think you hear a crunchy sound too.
Anon I think you watched it on tv. Get it on dvd because you actually see him get eaten which has been cut out A LOT
Lost World is just a bunch of “wouldn’t this be epic?” moments, but there is no attention given to the characters or story to make any of those epic moments make sense.
Yes and no. Nick Van Owen's character is motivated through his ties to GreenPeace to disrupt any human interference with the islands animals and ecosystems. Sarah Harding is there because she out of everyone Hammond sends is the most qualified to bring back information that he wants to know about, InGen is there as antagonists to the heroes and threat to the dinosaurs showcasing the worst of human presence with the animals, and this is all before we even get to Rolan Tembo and why he's there and he's arguably probably the best part of that movie.
Malcolm was there as a tie-in to the previous film, even more so than the cameo of Ellie and Tim. He was out of place with his girlfriend being there sure, but his adopted daughter who is black and does gymnastics shows up to. It threw off the needed family dynamic.
>that pic
WTF Jurassic Park is real??????
Always was.
Everything would've been fine if they just followed Crichton's sequel story. He basically wrote a screenplay in novel form. It was all island-based, too. Lush jungle shit, extremely adventerous, unhinged, and a bunch of the shit sequels still stole unused setpieces from it.
I hate Spielberg to the bone for what he did to TLW. The OG outline would have easily rivaled the first movie, and like with Alien/Aliens could've been a near-perfect duology.
>Everything would've been fine if they just followed Crichton's sequel story
they could never have done that, in the original both ian malcolm and dr hammond died.
You don't understand, The Lost World's novel was basically written as a sequel to the film, not the novel.
I mean not really, the only real retcon was Malcom not dying and even his death had only been a small bit at the end of the first novel so that wasn't huge, the big thing was that it just felt like Crichton wasn't really trying as hard as he normally did, which to be fair he probably wasn't since he only did it because the studio begged him too and he mostly used it to shore up plot holes in the first book
I'm not talking about the consistencies with the first novel or even with the film, I'm explicitly stating that The Lost World novel itself was made (forced) with the first film in mind.
t. hasn't read the story
Hammond's role was irrelevant whether dead or alive and Ian Malcolm survived and was the lead. Crichton did a 'slight' retcon with him; he was on the brink of death, but didn't die.
The Lost World movie is no masterpiece, but the novel is trash, and I say that as the biggest Crichton mark on the planet. It's far and away the worst thing he ever wrote.
Get fricked, you're no fan.
I'm absolutely no fan of a generic adventure novel that feels like something written solely out of a contractual obligation. It's an extremely lazy rehash, and the evolutionary theory/triggers of extinction events stuff that takes the place of the ethics of genetic engineering and chaos theory of the first novel is very hollow in comparison. Clearly Crichton recognising he can't JUST write about dinosaurs chasing motorbikes and scrambling for something that sort of looks like the meatier content of the first novel if you really squint at it. I quite like a few individual scenes, the stuff in the rex nest is absolute gold, but a few great standalone moments don't make for a great novel.
I don't care if he was a moneybawd, because without fail, all the best scenes come straight out of the novel, and all the shit parts are Spielberg's own bullshit.
The hunter, the two T-rexes, the trailer on the cliff, raptors in tall grass (and a motorcycle setpiece chase therein that makes sense, but unfilmed), NO ballerina bullshit, NO king kong-trash, just the leads vs in-gen corporates on a jungle island with dinos running in the wild. It would've been great for a movie.
I'd say there are enough good ideas in The Lost World to consider it a good book but it for sure was a shadow of Jurassic Park and definitely felt like the contractual obligation it was. It pretty much read like a screenplay in novel form.
>"Oh no the dinosaurs have escaped..... again!"
They became family movies
First two were cool.
Third one was trash kino.
World trilogy is goyslop.
Over reliance on cgi and weaponising raptors. JP 3 is pretty crap but its short and the spino was cool.
Oh yeah all the characters after the first are boring cardboard cutouts
wtf is memoral day
Remembering all the good goy soldiers.
I didn't even watch Dominion, Fallen Kingdom was so godawful.
First 2 were big and fun for the whole familly
3 was a cheap action flick.
4,5 and 6 are for children and horny parents.
Thematically and tonally the whole series is a mess. Paradoxically the new ones are more consistent in that regard and actually deliver the idea of messing with nature in a bad way much better because everything happens because of genetic monsters they cook up from zero. Sure they also consistently suck, but thematically are what the series should have gone towards after the first one.
I dunno, in hindsight it's a really weird series when you think about it. The first one is a milestone in cinema, but isn't perfect either (mainly the kids, they are fundamental for Alan's character but are incredibly obnoxious).
>mainly the kids, they are fundamental for Alan's character
>he warms up to children by the end
>every subsequent movie shows Alan and Dr. Sadler separated and childless
Why did they do this?
I think it's a bad case of the mindset that plagues modern Hollywood
>make movie
>characters go through a clear character arc and come out changed
>movie is a success
>producers/investors: "Nice! Now do the exact same thing again!"
At this point Dr. Grant has been struggling with the possibility of having kids for 30 fricking years. They don't care about growth, they care about repeating the successful formula over and over again until it stops turning a profit.
Any idea, no matter how clever or creative gets something lost each time it is reused
SUPA DINOSAUUUURS *AIR HORN*
THE GOOD DINOSAURS VS THE BAD DINOSAURS!!!
GO RAPTOR-CHU!!! USE BITE ATTACK!!!
This.
The idea of raptors being intelligent or at least more intelligent than primates was established in 3 and training or at least measuring that level of intellect with them is a neat idea on paper, but to then have Chris frickin' Pratt show up with his StarLord tier acting playing with CG actors and geeks flopping around in bluescreen outfits in front of him and the smartest raptor is color coded, its like...
Its Chris Pratt.
I feel like I'm the only one that likes the concept of "trained" raptors and raptor handlers. World dropped the ball making it all about action but in a better movie I think the concept could have been very well handled. Imagine a whole area of the park where you get to see raptors run obstacle courses as an attraction and an educational display of their intellect.
Yeah, I mean they're not dinosaurs, they're theme park monsters. And so, its not uncommon to think of the idea of getting them to do stuff like seeing if say a triceratops can do what we can train an elephant to do, instead of just letting them go eat and shit in the safari paddock with the rest of the moronic pachyosaurs and duckbills.
I personally liked the idea of the second one and exploring ruins of other installations Hammond had set up. 2 was fun for the thrill of seeing a dinosaur in a city, but there were five islands he purchased with Isla Sorna and Nublar being the major ones. I'm curious what else could be happening and what other junk was left behind on the other three islands. Moving into more populated areas for the films is a mistake. Keeping it in that jungle environment is what made those movies special cause it added to the idea we were back in the time of dinosaurs on a deeper psychological level.
I'd have liked trained raptors if it had been the sole focus of the movie as the theme park attraction. Think of orcas and their trainers. Or actual birds of prey and their handlers. I thought the nu trilogy's progression should have been
>train in park
>attempt at training military if you absolutely had to
>seeing training hold up once they've gone back into the wild
Maybe even film it in the style of a documentary District 9 style.
The color red I think
SOUL SOULLESS SOULLESS
SOULLESS SOULLESS SOULLESS
Since dinosaurs can't talk, the kino potential was always very low. Compare it to the Planet of the Apes movies which have some similarities, but since the monkeys can actually talk and engage with the human characters there's a lot more potential. Jurassic Park could only ever be a boring version of zombies.
What kind of room temp IQ take is this?
He's right though. It's why every JP movie plays out exactly the same.
Please, expand on that.
You can't do a lot with dinosaurs which is why every JP movie is a rehash of the first one.
You probably couldn't, I could though.
It's ironic that he/you used zombies as positive comparison, the most overabused and ran to the ground horror trope ever.
Mammal hands typed this. Next you're going to meme about us actually being feathered, I bet.
>Since dinosaurs can't talk
Excuse you!
This. The Reeve's monkey movies were good. The new Jurassic shart movies were embarrassing.
>Since dinosaurs can't talk
JP3 was all about how the raptors could communicate with each other and it was how their pack attack tactics worked
alan fricking 3d printed the bone that made it work
What a moronic movie.
Reminder that the original concept for JP3 was supposed to revolve around dinosaur-human hybrids that were supersoldiers firing laser guns or some shit, and was dropped because they realized that was just way too stupid.
Also reminder that the original Planet of the Apes had like 10 sequels that all fricking sucked ass wayyyy beyond even the worst JP sequel. The whole appeal of Jurassic Park is humans surviving against a form of nature that we've simply never encountered before. Not zombies or aliens or mutants, but simple-minded apex predators from far beyond our time.
No, it wasn't, that was JP4.
The original concept for JPIII was Grant living on Sorna.
>Also reminder that the original Planet of the Apes had like 10 sequels that all fricking sucked ass wayyyy beyond even the worst JP sequel.
Conquest is better than any JP film.
The new Apes trilogy was legitimately good, wdym? Precisely because they could do more with the monkeys than just "grr monkey mad monkey wanna kill". The new Jurassic world movies are fricking garbage because there isn't much you can do with angry lizards.
pota3 was fricking kino, they time traveled to the 70s and set it all up.
t. doesn't understand animals are actually smarter than most people think and are capable of communication through mainly non-verbal means
>kino
>kino
>comedy
>cashgrab
>crime against humanity
>kys
>What went wrong?
based. although, for guilty fun entertainment i do enjoy 3 a lot but in all sincerity there should've only been one movie.
How could anyone enjoy 3? Literally nothing fricking happens.
Dr. Grant goes to the other island and survives a bunch of new dinosaurs. It's not that hard to understand.
it wasn't meant to advance the overarching plot, it was always a b movie side adventure starring dr grant
god no. jurassic world is one of the worst fricking films i've ever seen, it's just a step below the star wars sequels. didn't even bother with fallen kingdom or dominion.
You like 3 but hate World? Frick JWFK and JWD but World was good, 3 is about as good as JWFK/D
Jurassic Park 3 is a film about cuckolding. Remember the themes of the former films? Life finds a way, survival, hubris of man, etc. Well now...
>entire premise of the movie is about a cuck (William H. Macey) saving his kid from his wife's frickbuddy
>Grant is a cuck, his entire arc from the previous films retconned, he even has to have dinner with Ellie's new boyfriend and their kid and then desperately has to call Ellie for her military boyfriend to come save him
>mercenaries jobbed and cucked, don't do anything but cry and get eaten
>t-rex the franchise mascot cucked
>raptors are all cucks with a female alpha
>ceratosaurus mogged and cucked by piles of feces
>even spino gets cucked, no climactic end sequence, just gets scared off by another cuck William H. Macey with a flare gun...
And the audience are the biggest cucks for having to sit through all this only for the movie to abruptly stop without a climax or conclusion and the army just shows up and everyone bails. Was the final 40 minutes of film left on the cutting room floor for budget reasons or what? JW2gays are less cucked.
But anyway, yeah. JP3 is one big pile of shit.
I liked the spinosaurus and all the toys/merch/games I just couldnt sit through the movie, after the spino/rex battle nothing else happens
Idk why people circlejerk over the pteranodon scene, it was alright but ultimately kind of stupid, like Billy gets killed who gives a frick about him or any of these people I hope they all die, Udesky was probably the best character
>Grant is a cuck, his entire arc from the previous films retconned
Grant and Ellie weren't romantically involved.
>Grant and Ellie weren't in talks about having children and taking it to the next level but Grant was afraid of commitment until he went on the harrowing journey with the children and realized the importance of life
You troons are complete fricking schitzos.
when he leapt with the parachute and it was playing this intense opera music I was like "......." that guy did not earn that at all, and Idek why he did that in the first place
and Ellie weren't in talks about having children and taking it to the next level but Grant was afraid of commitment until he went on the harrowing journey with the children and realized the importance of life
Post a link to when this is actually stated or stfu
WTF they were literally talking about whether they wanted to have kids together or not and Ellie refers to Grant with pet names like "honey" etc.
Are you baiting me?
Trying to find the dialogue but it seems YouTube doesn't have that exact skit afaik. But honestly I think you are seeing too much into it. They were completely asexual towards eachother, if they were together they'd have kissed at least fricking once.
No, you're not being baited. You simply put too much importance and read way too deep into Alan and Ellie's relationship like some shippergay.
And no, they weren't talking about having kids together. This is also the same conversation where she addresses him as Dr. Grant.
No, they were not.
Let me guess, you believe Rugratz was all Angelica's fever dream while she was being raped by Stu or some shit?
Grant and Ellie weren't romantically involved, you can clearly tell in the first movie. They're close colleagues.
Everything you just wrote is actually headcanon.
They were in the first movie. JPIII made the ex-couple which kind of ruins the development in the first movie and Dominion made them a couple again. Pandering that I can't be angry about.
>Dominion made them a couple again. Pandering that I can't be angry about.
That was the worst part. If they turned Grant into a cuck for no reason in 3 the least they could do is make him a bitter old man who doesn't care about Ellie and is just obsessed with his work, but instead they rewrote him as living a miserable life of daydreaming about the life he never had with ellie and they make fun of him for never having children the whole movie
Men aren't women, you will never be a woman, etc. Grant even makes a joke about their sex life to Malcom. Fricking have a nice day, please.
>Grant makes a joke about their sex life
No, he fricking doesn't. All he does is say they're together when Malcolm asks, and even then Grant says it in a fashion that's protective of Ellie because he knows Malcolm is a sleazeball looking to pump and dump her.
Is that the cartoon equivalent of thinking Alan and Ellie were an item?
>Ellie throwing in a quip to clearly tease Alan about his aversion to kids means they have the hots for each other
lots of mental gymnastics for this schitzo headcannon you have
Very few words for this non rebuttal you have.
there is no rebuttal, you're a schitzo and you're handwaving everything that has to do with their relationship because... (???) you're a schitzo just trying to shitpost? Idk
You ok?
I'm not handwaving anything. I'm going off exactly what the movie presented me. I'm not the one who put unwarranted importance on their relationship in the first place (for whatever reason, when the movie didn't even do this) only to go into JPIII with some shipgay mentality and get butthurt because Alan-kun didn't confess his undying love to Ellie-chan.
Unlike you I understand the nuances of a friendly but professional relationship between a man and a woman.
>shipgay mentality
YWNBAW
Good, because only a woman would get upset that their OTP didn't happen.
no one knows what you're talking about, dilate, men aren't women, the holocaust didn't happen, Christ is King, etc.
Christ is King and you're a moron.
?t=117
clearly engaged
>gets close and makes a sex joke
If you actually believe that that constitutes as rock solid evidence of them being an item even though they don't even accidentally kiss even once throughout the whole movie, I compel you to leave your house asap and seek sexual intercourse with a femal of your species. Now.
It more she called him honey
And? There are more times she addresses him formally.
You think someone snarkily calling you sweetie means they're flirting with you?
Nowadays a literal chatbot has a better understanding of language and its usage than you.
TLDR homie
And Grant wasn't in a relationship with that b***h, ever. Them getting together in the last movie was the writers finally giving in on all the gays shipping them together for the past thirty years.
>Idk why people circlejerk over the pteranodon scene, it was alright but ultimately kind of stupid
It's actually a really good scene, as far as tension and mood goes but I'm with you on the Billy thing. I couldn't have cared less about him and his safety.
There was a pteranodon scene in the first Jurassic Park book, it was nice to see it adapted
It embraces the whack scenario and is just an adventure flick. Much better than all of the other sequels being exactly that but still trying to pose as some deep reflection on humans and nature.
JPIII is the RE3 to TLW's RE2.
Oh it's dogshit man, I'm not arguing with you. I just really like the design of the Spinosaurus. Also, as an isolated scene on it's own the pterodactyl cage scene was pretty dope. honestly too good for that movie.
meant this image. goddamn, i need to stop drinking an hour before work...
>What went wrong?
they turned the dinos into characters instead of keeping them acting like unpredictable wild animals.
Apologize.
I didnt realize people hated the sequel so much
>Apologize
Uhh sorry for image related
You can see from the change in the logos and the taglines the gradual decline of the series. Interesting.
I actually enjoy the first two of the nu-trilogy as decent popcorn flicks but the third is a badly made film. Completely unwatchable garbage. Reboots that bring back original cast members are invariably cringe
I honestly think FK got a lot of undeserved shit. It was a lot more refreshing than JW with what they did with the story and setting. People focused too much on its worst parts which are indeed bad but for what it is, I think it was fine. The third one was pure nostalgia wanking. A couple cool ideas but its a travesty that the final boss of this franchise are fricking grasshoppers.
Should have been a Dino Crisis movie.
FK got the right amount of deserved shit.
Looking at them all lined up, those emblems are kind of a good indication of their movies.
>Fleshed out original
>Rough copy
>oh shit, what are you doing
>The first one again with less effort
>even less effort and it's falling apart
>frick it, burn the thing down, nobody cares
Jurassic Park, much like Jaws, was a one and done, not everything has to be a franchise
no, it begged for a sequel and TLW was it, it just could have been better
IMO JW was the most logical example of a third movie, finally see the park up and running but it all comes crashing down
The Lost World was the worst one. Dunno why people think so highly of it. Spielberg himself admits it's shit.
worst of the trilogy, third best of the saga.
power rankings are JP>JP3>TLW>goyslop
Piece of shit go frick off and die with your moronic tier lists.
you can get mad all you want you know i'm right
JP > TLW > JW >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JP3/JWFK/JWD
Stop lying you worm.
>dede de de dede de de dede de de de
Alan and Ellie weren't even together in the book, you frickheads.
They didn't make JP4 even shorter runtime with an even more cool an crazy dinosaur
What dinosaur could they have done after Spino?
Personally, I would have liked a film where the main dino stalking the group would be two Carnotaurus that can camouflage.
they should have never done spino and just left t-rex as the big bad and have other medium dinos and had rex show up only once and awhile
>they should have never done spino
Wrong.
>have other medium dinos and had rex show up only once and awhile
Correct.
1, 2 and 4 were great.
>Villain becomes the good guy
All said and done, the rex destroying the cars was kind of a weak scene. I've seen webms of rhinos obliterating a jeep in seconds, a rex would shatter a car to tiny bits with a nudge.
I like to drive my Mercedes-Benz while listening to my Sony Walkman on my Beats By Dre headphones to the dinosaur park. When I get there I am very thirsty so enjoy a nice cold can of Coca Cola while calling my friend from my Sony Phone. I then head to the raptor enclosure but a big burly man wearing Timberland Boots rides past me on his Triumph Motorcycle which makes me drop my $20 Ben and Jerry's. An annoying zoomer is playing music from his Bose speaker while I wait in queue for the raptors, my feet hurt I wish I had a pair of timberlands. After the raptors I get hungry so check my Samsung smart watch and sure enough it's lunch time, I walk over to Yoshinoya and enjoy some over priced japanese food while watching movie trailers on the big Imax screen in the street. After all those carbs I start to feel sleepy so grab a Starbucks Iced Latte and do a little shopping at Pandora before heading back to my Hilton Hotel King-sized Suite. Phew what a day
https://www.ranker.com/list/jurassic-world-product-placement/jtdesaulnier
I mean, dinosaurs are always going to be cool to kids and they are always going to sell. Always. The problem with JP is that every other movie featuring dinosaurs that came before it was now obsolete and every other dinosaur movie that came after it had to live up to the standards that movie set. It was THAT big and it had within its production the literal best of the best the movie industry had. Editing, production, computer effects and animatronics; it was ALL there. And most importantly, it was all grounded in a very believable and realistic story. The second one came out and it built upon the previous film. The third one was good because it had the barebones of the previous two crews, giving props to Joe Johnston on his first director attempt, but by then the budget wasn't as big, the competition in theatres was huge and even though they had Sam Neill and Tea Leoni, she didn't have the right haircut. Regardless, that first run of those movies ensured that whatever dinosaur product you saw on the toy shelves had the Jurassic Park logo on it and every toy they had were real dinosaurs species with the distinct JP artstyle. Kids will always find dinosaurs to be cool, so you will always have toys sold.
I didn't see the last two but I did see the reboot in theatres. Nothing against Bryce cause she is absolutely gorgeous and its great Vincent D'onofrio got a role as a bad guy he played flawlessly, but shooting it on digital ruined the feel of the environments and overusing CG where it was a treat for the original is a place to start. I saw it in 3D and when that scene of the sick dinosaur showed up for that callback to the first movie, I could see the edge of the digital element composite sticking out like sore thumb from the rest of the scene and background. Amateurish things like that would have never flown in the first, never mind other two movies. It had drifted so far from the original premise the novel set for the first movie while aping that film throughout,.
>she didn't have the right haircut
You take that back. Pixie cut Leoni was sex.
My god, man....come ON....
Take it up with my erection, I don't make the rules.
Your erection and penis in general is in no way conducive to whether Tea Leoni's hairstyle in JPIII was suitable and fitting for her. The pixie cut could have firt for any other role but stood out like a sore thumb in Jurassic Park.
Have you considered that Tea Leoni is hot in all forms?
Indubitably.
....just not in Jurassic Park III.
If not hot, then very cute.
Tea Leoni was only there because she sucked off Steven Spielberg for her role in Deep Impact. He gave her a role in JP3 to return the favor and to keep her mouth shut (while not around his wiener)
Eeeeewww.....
Imagine looking up to see googly eyed bespectacled Steven Spielberg rolling his head around and signing because his shrivelled cheesy smelling mutilated vinegar tasting schlong is in your mouth all for the privelege of sharing the screen with William H. Macy.
Wow, Tori Spelling is looking GOOD.
Should have just went all the way in on the mutant dinosaurs as weapons instead of suddenly dropping it in dominion.
I don't even remember anything from the first three movies, other then one being really good, one being meh, and one of them being really boring.
I don't think I've ever cringed harder at anything than when the clone girl jumped forward with no buildup to do the hand thing like it was some heroic passing the torch thing.
that hand shit is so goddamn stupid. in dominion he uses it on two huge untrained dinos and it works
I wonder how many morons are going to go to a national park and try doing that to the wild life.
>only one guy ever was eaten trying the same thing the point being he didn't have a bond
>it just werks on every single other dino for anyone in the protag role no matter what
Fricking How to Train Your Dragon did the same thing and I hated it.
Turning the dinos into pokemon was the worst thing about these stupid movies.
they completely dropped the horror element
>What went wrong?
There was nothing wrong with this.
why was this in the film
To reinforce how Eric managed to survive on a dinosaur island for 2 whole months.
they said the piss attracted the spinosaur
why the frick would he keep that piss around
The Spinosaurus was probably attracted to large amounts of it, not a small vial-full he probably sprinkled around the perimeter of his tanker to keep other prying dinosaurs away at the faintest scent of an apex.
I used to visit lost-world.com on my old Pentium II machine. I was really bummed when the website finally went down in 2020. I need to get around to downloading it off the waybackmachine and host it locally.
Irks my autism that they couldn't be assed to make proper variations of the raptors from each film.
The first was written by a medical doctor passionate about the subject matter
The rest were written by studios
Michael Crichton also wrote the Lost World, but like the Jurassic Park it was a very different book from the movie.
Also, tfw you will never see a movie adaptation of Muldoon fighting a t-rex with an rpg-7.
First movie: Thriller with tech-dystopia-horror elements
Everything else: Action-Adventure dinoshit
They completely missed the point. The first movie had a sense of dread and terror.
>What went wrong?
Not enough 'Push to Close'.
1>2>3>4>5>6
Are there any other series where no film ever manages to be better than its predecessor?
Boomer risk aversion = IP churn unto death. With 3 they had something to play with.
>oh god, rapid evolution what the frick is going on: dino zombies? oh god oh frick we have to kill them all before they become sentient
>eco-terrorist bleeding hearts and nihilistic end times cultists working against this
>Militaries want to control and use it against their better judgement, or initiate premptive MAD contingency plans because it's all going off the rails
>weather modification technology has to go public to freeze out the lizard c**ts
>sorry folks, but everyone's going to get hairier, especially women
Incapability to read the fear in the air and the trajectory of current trends in the public's mind, or how that would play juggling archetypes. Dinos will never be not cool, and it's a testament to their lack of imagination and storycraft that they've driven the franchise into such mid depths.
>*click!* *click!*
>FLIP! FLIP!
No Spino
The third one is just as good as the first one and I'm tired of hearing people say it's not.
Jurassic Park felt like we were seeing the demise of the greatest iteration of DisneyLand to never exist, the greatest theme park that COULD ever exist. 'Live real dinosaurs' is a tagline for a product you can sell to the entire human race. Its very idea would become something of a cultural milestone in someones life whether or not they went to Jurassic Park at some point. Literally on the cusp of opening and world wide acclaim, we just so happened to took the pre-opening tour with the other visitors and watched it all go to hell.
I really dig all the fan art that's come out since conceptualizing what the park could have been like.
I am so mad that we don't have a video game or something similar that lets you explore the islands. Parks, abandoned architecture, all of it.
I don't know the name of it off by heart, but a fan made game covering just that is on its way. It looks like a chill stroll through the setting and adds a few places we didn't see. It will be on Steam soon.
You mean that game coming out on Dreams? You gotta have a PS4/5, unfortunately.
Really excited for it, though.
Yeah, that looks like it.
1>3
>>>new trilogy
shit>>>lost world
probably women or something