What's the ugliest movie ever made?

What's the ugliest movie ever made?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Tim Burton Alice in Wonderland

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This or the transformers movies.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >More greebles is heckin' GOOD!
          That's what the cg nerds "designing" this shit thought.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Raging

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Source?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Bumblebee 2018, be warned though that the this stuff is a very small part of the film.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I see. Thanx anon

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Raging

                went to see this with my gf and it was kino

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >watching BMWF propaganda
                have a nice day

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                if you are watching the bmwf shit and not the big cool robots there is something wrong with you

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                It didn't have to be in the movie at all homosexual, it adds nothing to the story and is clearly the director/writer's thinly veiled fetish

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Literally flawless shockwave design though

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Arcee's porcelain doll face is extremely frickable

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Bumblebee 2018, be warned though that the this stuff is a very small part of the film.

              Thanks for posting these.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Bumblebee 2018, be warned though that the this stuff is a very small part of the film.

              This looks like a fricking cartoon

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah it's awesome

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It's like 99% motion blur.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            That's what makes it kino.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              God I really need to rewatch the transformers franchise all the way through. I only saw up to dark of the moon.
              Need me some comfy late 2000s kino from the first few films and explosionmeme kino from the rest.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          transformers sound-design is kino tho

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >OH N-

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous
        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Optimus Warcrime

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I was thinking about what's so awful about these movies and it's the issue of over-emphasizing the character detail.

          Like your brain can't process the amount of detail and it's annoying to watch.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It's why high frame rate is a bad meme. Too much detail can be a bad thing unless you're watching sports.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >get shot through the torso in the back while laying prone
          >fly vertically into the air in the direction opposite to the force being applied

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Take that back about Transformers c**t

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Go back to fricking Reddit, I'm actually fricking pissed off Holy shit. Where the frick do you gays come from

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Frick you

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Cat in the Hat is gaudy but it actually commits to an aesthetic.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >entire film is just shit brown
      >every shot is an obvious greenscreen
      >obnoxious bloom everywhere

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What happened to you Burton? His 80s and 90s films were always beautiful

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The premise of these ones suck, I'd sooner a live action regular fricking retelling of Alice in wonderland but the "THERES A WAR AND WONDERLAND IS DYING" motif really fricking immediately fricks up the potential for aesthetics. That said he still could have had the colors and imagery and maybe made it a shattered world instead of WonderIraq

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          me on the left
          (and on the far left again)

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >entire film is just shit brown
          >every shot is an obvious greenscreen
          >obnoxious bloom everywhere

          >make Alice in Wonderland
          >make it brown and grey
          ?????????

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Season 3 of The Terror, Tuunbaq returns.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What happened to you Burton? His 80s and 90s films were always beautiful

        Intentional uncanny valley

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What happened to you Burton? His 80s and 90s films were always beautiful

        this looked really good quite frankly. the only thing i disliked was the shitty mad hatter breakdance scene after the last battle.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >every shot is a greenscreen
          >every scene has a brown filter over it

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Walt would be mad if he knew they casted this skeleton to play Alicia

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The sequel did actually remember to have colors
        Alice's actress aged bafflingly badly in only six years though.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Kino dress

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Quite possibly this. They raped the source material and it was as terrible as that phrase sounds.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Bingo

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Not even close.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Pic

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I liked Cats and I will never apologize for it

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      /thread

      >captcha: DSSNY

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >entire film is just shit brown
      >every shot is an obvious greenscreen
      >obnoxious bloom everywhere

      What happened to you Burton? His 80s and 90s films were always beautiful

      The premise of these ones suck, I'd sooner a live action regular fricking retelling of Alice in wonderland but the "THERES A WAR AND WONDERLAND IS DYING" motif really fricking immediately fricks up the potential for aesthetics. That said he still could have had the colors and imagery and maybe made it a shattered world instead of WonderIraq

      Bingo

      This film looks like absolutely dogshit. I don't care who made it, or when. The end result is horrible, and not in some ironic artistic way, it's just crap. Even the composition sucks in the film, usually a strong suit of his, never mind the greenscreen everything and brown filter.
      [...]
      [...]
      [...]

      I don't know why you think I'm "seething" at Tim Burton. I like Tim Burton, or at least his output up to the 2000s where it became hit or miss with more misses.

      I liked it as a kid

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >as a kid

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      first reply, best reply.

      What happened to you Burton? His 80s and 90s films were always beautiful

      this is just what happens when you do everything on a green screen and film everyone separately and try to piece it all together in a computer. It ends up looking like a high school project from a kid who just started learning how to use photoshop.

      The Harry Potter movies were pretty fricking ugly. The later films are so desaturated they're practically black and white and they have really weird lighting. It doesn't even really make sense thematically. Even light hearted scenes with friends in a cozy library look like a World War 2 documentary. This is from 2007 but it looks like a PS2 game. There's nothing realistic about this lighting.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yates has the most dull fricking vision of these films, I can't believe he wound up doing like seven films in that franchise

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >The later films are so desaturated they're practically black and white
        And you don’t think that’s an intentional reflection of the plot development?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      CGI killed Burton. If his modern films stuck with a majority of stop-motion effects it'd feel right at home

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Monster house is pretty offensive

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      A shame as it's actually a good film

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's ugly, dark, and gives you anxiety. The exact opposite of what a Christmas movie is supposed to be... and it doesn't even get the excuse of being a "parody" or quirky film.

        Im one of the morons that actually like this uncanny cg movies. They just tickle me the right way.

        >Im one of the morons that actually like this uncanny cg movies. They just tickle me the right way.
        >t. hates humanity, probably wishes he were israeli

        What happened to you Burton? His 80s and 90s films were always beautiful

        >What happened to you Burton?
        He became rich and started getting laid. Literally never have sex if you don't want Helena Bonham Carter to steal your soul.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Monster House isn't a Christmas movie it's a spooky kids movie.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              No, not really, since you replied to someone talking about Monster House.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I get that you're a zoomer and you think this is what trolling is, but it's not. It's just you being moronic on purpose and me feeding you (You)s because you thrive on negative attention.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Anon, you replied to a post about Monster House with chatter about Christmas movies. You made the error so I don't know why you're acting like others are in the wrong.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, no. I get it. You think if you're super subtle and coy and you can get this troll past my defenses. The thing is, you can't. And the reason you can't is because you're a zoomer and it's not a good troll. It's just you pretending to be moronic on purpose. So, take these (You)s and the advice and ponder what kind of anon you want to be going forward.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You're moronic.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Monster House isn't a Christmas movie...

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I don't agree, the movie has a lot of Christian parallels in its examination of belief. To me, it is definitely one of the most Christian Christmas films of the modern era.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >I don't agree, the movie has a lot of Christian parallels in its examination of belief.
            Because you're a cuck. If you have to think about it, you missed the point. Critiquing a Christmas movie and doing the whole "ackshully when you think about it" is pointless when the visuals are the problem. Film is a visual medium. The movie is visually ugly and uncomfy in its aesthetic. The exact opposite of what you want in a Christmas movie.

            > it is definitely one of the most Christian Christmas films of the modern era.
            Holidays are celebrated on a cultural level, not a universal one. Christianity is a universal religion. So, Christianity can (and should) inform a Christian film but that film should still represent a culture. What culture does this represent? Ugly israeli trans-humanist golem-puppet robots wearing human skin? It's vile and it most certainly isn't Christian.

            Everyone with any honesty looks at that film and rightly concludes "oh, they replaced the white girl in this situation with a white-acting black girl" because a black Christmas film would not be Polar Express. Black people have their own things, and that's perfectly ok. They don't even sing the same song for childrens birthdays. It's fine. But the number of white-acting black people who practice white culture and identify with it are so tiny that it makes this sort of "race blind" casting more a performative stunt than a virtue. It was probably done to satisfy diversity mandates and not spite but that doesn't change the fact that no one with a soul and a functioning immune system really wants to celebrate multicultural holidays.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              based

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              The cucked mind at work

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Checked and based
              >They don't even sing the same song for childrens birthdays
              qrd please. my sides are prepared.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Black folks think "Happy Birthday to You" is too corny and uptight. Can't dance and whoop to it. They sing the chorus to the Stevie Wonder song "Happy Birthday to Ya". Not even making that up.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nah I've jerk offd way too much to that girl

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Nice

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          He's talking about the house

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >the upskirt scene
          kino

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            post it

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          [...]
          [...]
          [...]
          It's fine for its era. There's far worse. And yeah, Jenny a cute!

          I vividly remember a dream I had when I was like 14, we were in a different monster house and spent half the dream making out and talking and the other half fighting little house goblins. No idea why I remember that, I didn't get obsessed with her character or the movie or anything. Never dreamed her again. I don't even remember the details of the dream. I just have this incredibly powerful gist that will never go away.

          Tl;Dr Jenny a cute

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The art direction is great, the CG has just aged like milk. Even the first Incredibles looks stone age by today's standards.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Bobs Burgers

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Im one of the morons that actually like this uncanny cg movies. They just tickle me the right way.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I enjoy it also. They have a sort of surreal feeling to them

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Seeing Red

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Some of the Narnia movies and the golden compass movie have some gnar shots in otherwise decent looking movies

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    toy story 1 had better cgi than crystal skull

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Seeing a Spielberg film go all Prequels greenscreen shit like Lucas's dreck was painful, if there was one thing to say about Spielberg's films it was that they were always technically superior compared to the average Hollywood film

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I just want to know why. He's one of the biggest names in the entire industry, he can budget whatever he wants, he has countless connections and worked with so many amazing set and effects artists. He could have made a real movie. So why did he blow out this travesty?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Given he's made great looking films since then, I just have to assume Lucas got in his ear about doing more computer shit like he did with the PT. There's still plenty of practical stuff in the film, but mostly in the first act, as soon as they go to the jungle it turns to absolute shit visually and never recovers.

          The over the topness of Crystal Skull in the second half feels more Pirates of the Caribbean than Indiana Jones. Indy was fanciful but not THAT cartoony.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Because the visual effects industry has become 99% digital and most digital shit gets outsourced to pajeets in Bangalore
          Next time you see a Marvel or big budget special effects heavy movie, look at how many Bishnu Shamalamams are there in the credits under VFX artists

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >tfw you will never spend hours rehearsing swordfight moves with Cate Blanchett while she gets all hot and exhausted

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      indiana jones and the crystal skull was the first movie i ever saw on bluray. i remember thinking it was so crazy that bluray videos had such high video quality that you could actual make out the special effects. big lol

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      How is that gun supposed to be operated?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        yes

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Turning Red

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It triggers a whole new cringe reflex

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    fyi the reason they all so ugly is because they did use motion capture to get the actors movements but they couldn't replicate the eyes so all the eyes were done from scratch which is why they look "off"

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The Hobbit 3
    What the hell happened? The first two parts had lots of bad effects and overdone lighting, but this third film had this smeared grey bloom filter over every scene and 90% of any shot seemed to be crappy CG

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Lotr
      >So they probably have to repeat the same guy 1000 times on screen but it still looks like a real army of guys, so crazy!
      >Hobbit
      >You literally spammed the same one guy 1000 times, so lazy!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I have no idea if you're attempting to complain or not

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I'm saying LOTR uses tricks that even when looked for can't be easily figured out, the Hobbit uses the same tricks so poorly that it looks cheap

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Actually, LotR looks way better because they usually had real scenery shots superimposed with subtle CGI, or even used "bigatures" which were real sets scaled down.
        It was at a time where CGI was still in its infancy so they knew they had to resort to more practical solutions, otherwise it would look like garbage like the SW prequels.
        Nowadays, producers just goes full CGI for some moronic reason, probably to reduce budget and effort

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >reduce budget
          CG is expensive

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            then why the frick do they do that when it's inferior?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Because it allows them to change details later on. I suspect that an efficient director that can work around studio meddling, like David Lean, would make cheaper movies without CGI than with.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It's much cheaper than practical, are you insane?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              No it isn't

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Oh okay. So it takes more money to render a CGI image of a castle than hire skilled artists to spend weeks or months creating a matte paintin? Damn I didn't know that I guess that fantasy movie me and my friends made for $200 with custom CGI effects would have been even cheaper if we had spent more time and money testing and making practical effects. Mind = blown

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Professional CGI is different from you using a couple of Movie Maker effects in your hobby project.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Not after you have a library of assets you can recycle ad infinitum.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Holy frick, I wish I didn't zoom in on the faces. How did this get approved?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Because they were pressed for time. The film was due in December and they had another 1000 VFX shots still needing to be done

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      ARR ROOK SAME

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      And the copypasted troops are not the most offensive thing to me here, it's that ugly grey bloom over everything, like they doused the lens in vaseline

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Like look at this shit, why is it so blown out?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Cause I started fricking it

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          And the copypasted troops are not the most offensive thing to me here, it's that ugly grey bloom over everything, like they doused the lens in vaseline

          Tim Burton Alice in Wonderland

          really pathetic how Peter Jackson, Burton and Spielberg just stopped caring about art direction over the years.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I cut jackson a bit of a break because he never even wanted to make the hobbit films to begin with and when he did agree to it it was meant to only be two movies. So by the end he was probably being rushed and just couldn't be fricked anymore. Its sad though I would have liked to seen what guillermo del toro's Hobbit would have been like.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Spielberg got his shit back together eventually after that 2000s period, at least. Jackson has pretty much retired from feature films, only doing documentaries, and Burton seems on autopilot.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Spielberg's problem is that he started working with Janusz "Soft Focus + More Mood Lighting = Gooder" Kaminski.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This is probably the winner. The third Hobbit movie feels like the first movie completely generated by a computer. Nothing looks real, nothing is composited well, none of the action makes sense, and every line of dialogue seems designed by a committee of robots. I saw it in the theater and it was an assault on the senses.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      /thread
      nearly impossible to beat this one, it takes every CGI stereotype and abuses it to absurd lenghts

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Wheres the black elves?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I'd be worried about finding a second elf among that lot.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >What the hell happened?
      zero preparation

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Your sex tape

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    hobbit movies are ugly as frick. Also, Last Jedi is very ugly and tasteless. Which is kinda funny considering how good Knives Out looks.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >how good Knives Out looks
      Wut. It looks like every other movie.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That's not even a shot from the film

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It's clearly from a deleted scene then because it looks exactly the same.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Spawn

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      90's kino

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        shitkino

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      DIPPÉ RULES

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Some bad cgi doesnt make the whole movie ugly, the practical stuff was decent atleast.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Polar Express, Shrek 2, Incredibles, Shark Tale
    none of the 2004 CG films were very visually appealing

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Shark Tale wasn't made by the folks behind Antz, Shrek and Madagascar tho. It was a different branch at another city

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        i love Shark Tale so much

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        better than the puerile, cynical, art destroying, postmodern crap that was Shrek 2 earlier that year

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Son of the Mask

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >being filtered this hard

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, that is a black and white filter

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    which one has the most Black folk in it

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >shitting on Zulu
      Look at this pleb trying to fit in

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Foodfight!

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This one.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you're fricking gay if you wouldn't

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    A Bug's Life

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That scene is moronic but it's just going for the unnecessary dutch angle shaky cam MTV "aesthetic". The CGI cats just doing normal cat stuff or the scenes where Catwoman herself is CGI are much worse. The dialogue scenes are set like a bad soap opera.
      And the worst thing is it's way less ugly than Vidocq, the director's previous movie, which should be a strong contender if it wasn't so irrelevant imo. Funnily enough it's the 1st movie shot entirely on digital.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Forgot pic

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Cool FMV game bro

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Hey, OP said ugliest movie not scene. The whole film looks like trash.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I'm just saying this scene gets all the hate and it's not very fair. And again not even the ugliest movie from that director.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I'm just saying this scene gets all the hate and it's not very fair. And again not even the ugliest movie from that director.

        Sweet Christmas

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It's like Zack Snyder trying to do Sam Raimi

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Cats

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    what the frick was Zach thinking with the shallow depth of field in this movie? is it really just to hide bad effects?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Turns out he can't DP for shit

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Without Larry there, the moron was unleashed

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Justice League 2017.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Made me laugh out loud

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      There's a good pick. Not one frame of that film looked real.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      the frick is he doing? was this filmed in reverse?

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >We were forced to become what you drove through today, a burnt-out coal field, and the biggest icebox graveyard east of the Ohio foundry belt.
    And that's why I NEVER let a Banker go!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      How about a financial publisher?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        When you're reeve you can run things the way you like.

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The version of A Christmas Carol with Jim Carrey is exceptionally heinous.

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Latest spiderman.

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Sky Captain

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Tekkonkinkreet is really ugly in an endearing way.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      In the same vein Triplets of Belleville.

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Martyrs

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Any overly green-screened movie like Bohemian Rhapsody. Always looks cheap and plastic.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      When did it all go wrong for Disney

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i can't fricking stand florence pugh. her head and torso are so stocky, it makes her face look too small. shockingly bad proportions for any woman who isn't from a pacific island.

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    That CGI abomination movie Delgeo (sp?) or whatever and Foodfight were pretty bad. It's hilarious that picrel was made by Disney and had a budget too. Oh no wait OP is Polar Express? I thought it was Mars Needs Moms

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    All CGI films will age badly going by this thread. Even Toy Story, Cars and Monster Inc look like shit

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Where the dead go to die:

    It's the most disturbing and ugliest piece of cinema i've ever witnessed

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's still oddly better than Foodfight even if it's literally Mr. Pickles made by a psycho (on purpose not for comedy)

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Wow you made me remember that movie. I forgot all about it for a long time.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        the dog-mom scene is forever burned into my mind

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The eye scene messed me up the most.

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Movies with all black casts

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Everyone in this thread citing Tim Burton's films is moronic. They're that way on purpose so shouldn't count. With the exception of maybe Batman '89, they're basically horror films with a light or comedic tone. OP should have specified UNIRONICALLY ugliest movies, but still.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Well that's a pile of utter horseshit, because Burton's films in the 80s and 90s were beautiful. Gothic and grim and all that, but beautiful.

      Alice in Wonderland is just hideous, a brown filter slapped over everything and ugly greenscreening in every scene, nothing looks convincing.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Never said they weren't beautiful so not sure who you're arguing with.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Well his many very beautiful films haven't been called ugly here so I can't say I know who you're arguing with either. No one said Ed Wood, or Sleepy Hollow or Batman Returns are ugly.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Again, you're mad at Tim Burton for doing bad Tim Burton. You don't actually think Alice is "ugly" because you love his brand of ugly. You just weren't visually entertained by that one.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      the only Burton film being cited is the Alice film from 2010, are you claiming that's a horror film or that being a horror film gives you license to make a shitty looking film?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I'm claiming you're mad at Tim Burton for doing Tim Burton badly and trying to slip that seethe into a thread about ugly films. Tim Burton is being moronic on purpose, good or bad. It doesn't count.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          This film looks like absolutely dogshit. I don't care who made it, or when. The end result is horrible, and not in some ironic artistic way, it's just crap. Even the composition sucks in the film, usually a strong suit of his, never mind the greenscreen everything and brown filter.

          >entire film is just shit brown
          >every shot is an obvious greenscreen
          >obnoxious bloom everywhere

          What happened to you Burton? His 80s and 90s films were always beautiful

          Bingo

          I don't know why you think I'm "seething" at Tim Burton. I like Tim Burton, or at least his output up to the 2000s where it became hit or miss with more misses.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >I don't know why you think I'm "seething" at Tim Burton.
            Because you clearly are. You went back to the holodeck but this time Minuette didn't quite have the charm and attraction. Something had changed. But instead of accepting that the Binars were shit to begin with and Minuette was always fake you go into holodeck simulation threads and seethe.

            If Tim Burton wasn't a hack weirdo to begin with then he'd still be making beautiful films because beauty is timeless. But he was a a product of his time who got old, got rich, had sex, and that's what you're mad about. You don't want to believe that your le quirky dark gothic aesthetic is more than just gay homosexualry. You want to believe it was real, damnit! It's not.

            So repent of your sodomy and learn to into actual beauty and stop shitting up threads about beauty with getting mad at ugly-merchants who stop selling your preferred brand of ugly.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Holy shit what the actual frick is this schizo going on about?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                looks like a shcizo /trek/ poster that got out of his containment thread. Apparently he's having difficulty reconciling Burton's steady decline starting with the Apes remake.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                No one cares about your seething over a general

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                frick them honestly kek, some of the worst posters on this board. especially the lower decks schizo

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Jesus fricking Christ you can't just keep using "unironically" for everything, get a damn vocabulary.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Jesus fricking Christ
        >get a damn vocabulary.
        check out this wordsmith.

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Mirrormask is up there. Which is a shame because it's inventive and I feel like if it had 50% more budget it might have been kino. As it stands it comprises of some terrible early 90s looking greenscreen/cgi despite being made in 2005.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      sounds kino

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      that reminds me of the Casshern and Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. Those early "all green screen" movies when the technology just wasn't there.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        This is at least as "real" as a marvel movie, but it looks better.

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I would love to know what makes some movies just look like shit. I rewatched the 2000s scooby doo ones recently, and despite the terrible CGI and generally cheap look of a lot of stuff both of them pop out visually and are really appealing to look at

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Alien vs Predator: Requiem

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Almost the entire film has this extremely dark look to it too, only the daytime scenes avoid it, and even those have a tendency to look too dark to feel like daytime, it isn't a problem with the rip or whatever it really is just this ugly.

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's too bad it's so ugly, because Polar Express is otherwise top Christmas kino.

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Final Fantasy Spirits Within is the ugliest thing I've ever seen

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Pretty ugly, right up there with galarians tbh but not the ugliest.

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the deathrace sequel. not the jason statham one

  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    .

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      what's this from?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        CGI remake of Yellow Submarine that was canned, in pre-production by robert zemeckis who made Polar Express, canned around 2010

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >canned
          Thank heavens

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          man zemeckis really shit the bed after who framed roger rabbit

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >pre-production
          So, basically nothing but some ideas and maybe concept art.

  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies

  45. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The Garbage Pail Kids Movie. And I don't care if it's meant to be ugly, because it's physically painful to watch and it doesn't help that it's one of the worst movies ever made.

  46. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    AOTC is up there

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This looks utterly impeccable though

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        No, it looks like Christopher Lee on a crappy greenscreen

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I remember when AotC came out I was like 21 and everybody I know goofed on it. All I remember about that movie is the jokes because it sucked. And this was before being angry at movies was a popular thing. We thought The Matrix was going to be our generation's Star Wars so we were pretty smug about it. In retrospect, I wish I'd have been more humble and kinder to George instead of putting my faith in literal trannies. But, it was the early 00's and I was young.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The film sucks dick

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah I suppose it does but if you put a gun to my head and said watch AotC until you die or Rise of Skywalker I'd probably go witn the prequels. Star wars is dead regardless

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Wow, two crap films. What a choice.

  47. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Digital killed movies

  48. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Lawnmower man

  49. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    dude, brown and grey, lol

  50. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Arcane

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That's not a movie, champ.

  51. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Disney Pixar movies recently

  52. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Stars Wars Prequels, TCW movie.

  53. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It suffers from a limited color palate and some bland designs, but it's definitely not "ugly".

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        this. it's one of the most beautifully shot sci fi movies. the aesthetics are on point, and the closest you'll ever get to a decent DUNE adaptation.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It is. It's an "epic" movie with NOTHING to look at.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Overhyped but not ugly

  54. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the comedian. tim heidecker. he obviously made this movie intentionally bad because he's 2deep4me. but i can't believe i watched this. it was as bad as a student film project. everything about it was just a bore and bland to look at. maybe it's not the ugliest. but i really felt disgusted after watching this.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Lol comedians are frauds and fricking losers

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That's kind of the point, isn't it.
      The banality of millennial nihilists.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        There is a very small gap, like a mini-generation, between the last of the Gen-Xers with their cool, detached, underachiever slacker ethos and the dawning of the SJW terminally-online bugperson that was ushered in by Obama. Probably less than a decade but it is definitely a distinct cohort of individuals completely caught between pre- and post- social media.

  55. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Any kubrick movie

  56. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You guys ever get car sick? That cold sweat, nausea, throbbing headache car sick? This is what this movie made me feel like.

  57. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Gummo

  58. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >using the term "pic related" in an infographic

  59. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Slapstick of Another Kind

  60. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What the frick happened with Straczynski after Babylon 5 ended? Did he remove his brain? Crusade fricking suuuuuuuucked.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The network pulled the plug before the first episode even aired. It never had a chance.

  61. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Actually sweaty, the Son of God was ugly!!!

    Kill them all

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      god only loves superficially beautiful things? i guess you're going to hell then lmao

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      that's racist

  62. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Traffic

  63. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I bet realistic fake live action could be pulled off better with deepfakes

  64. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Lightyear.
    The eyes on brown characters in nu-Pixar flicks look too revolting.

  65. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i love polar express so much

  66. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Alien 3

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *