Where's my Dunc 2: Denis Cut?

Where's my Dunc 2: Denis Cut?

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Thufir and?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Possibly Baron Fenring

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Count Fenring*

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Count Fenring*
          Turns out he didn't count. At all.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Tim Blake Nelson (Count Fenring)

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i hate this stupid french homosexual
    >NOOO YOU CAN'T JUST RE-EDIT A MOVIE AND RE-RELEASE IT THAT'S ABSURD
    most director's cuts are better, only a few directors decide to botch it

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why would re-edit a movie if you the one you have works? Just to add more bloat? Extended editions homosexuals aren't interested in art, just "more content".
      No wonder they all came from the nerd/geek sphere.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        are you fricking stupid? the reason they're meant to be edited down in the first place is at the request of the studio, moron
        if a scene doesn't fit into the movie it isn't added in as "bloat", it remains separate
        in this case, yes, cutting out the guild, cutting out thurfit hawat, cutting out fenrig, cutting out 50% of the fricking book, is kind of a problem
        then again i shouldn't assume that moronic dennis would have put in anything useful rather than actual garbage like another pointless scene with zendaya scowling at chalamet

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Extended editions homosexuals aren't interested in art
        speak for yourself, moron
        the directors cut of kingdom of heaven is literally different (and much better) movie

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Usually they re-edit the movie so they can release it again and have the same fans buy the movie twice. It makes sure the cut scenes don't go to waste and you didn't spend months of your life filming things that end up on the cutting room floor.
        I guess this doesn't really matter for Dune because there are no Dune fans and no one will want to see more of the same shitty movie. Dune is more of a quick pump and dump and not a classic masterpiece like Lord of the Rings where everyone watches the extended cut.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >most director's cuts are better, only a few directors decide to botch it
      Please list examples. Movies are not just a collection of scenes in chronological order, it has to work as a whole.
      Dune 2 is already very long, wriggle room of maybe 10-15 minutes, using that time on thufir and count fenring scenes wouldn't accomplish shit, it would hurt the movie and make it feel bloated with useless characters. If they really had to add stuff they should probably just extend some already present scenes, like the water of life scene

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the shining, kingdom of heaven, batman v superman, just off the top of my head

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >the shining
          there is no extended, US version is the original
          >kingdom of heaven
          agreed
          >batman v superman
          agreed but still bad and snyder is a hack

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >there is no extended
            there literally is, are you stupid?
            >Contrary to popular belief, Kubrick regarded both the 144 minute 'US version' and the 119 minute 'European version' as director's cuts. Nevertheless, the longer version is the one now most commonly available.
            from google
            i hope your argument isn't that it's not an extended or director's cut because it was released simultaneously, because you can eat shit if you're here to argue semantics
            >agreed but still bad and snyder is a hack
            irrelevant, it's better than the theatrical release, that's all that matters

            What do you expect from an extended cut?
            Another villain in The Dark Knight and another layer of dream in Inception?

            t. mouthdrooling moron

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >the 144 minute 'US version'
              that's the standard version you fricking moron, Kubrick editing a version for tv after the fact doesn't retroactively make the original an extended cut you dumb mongoloid mutt

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Kubrick editing a version for tv after the fact
                it wasn't edited after the fact
                imagine calling someone a mongoloid when you can't even read the text in what you replied to lmao
                also
                >after the fact doesn't retroactively make the original an extended cut
                you're a moronic person, anon, to a degree that's quite sad to see
                if you knew anything about the movie business (i know, you don't, you're a subhuman Black person who talks out of his ass), you'd be well aware that most director's cuts/extended cuts literally came before the theatrical cut that got released
                directors don't find footage on a hdd somewhere years after the fact and think
                >you know what, best add this into my movie
                no, moron, studios demand that movies are cut down to size to be under a certain runtime, or to get rid of extremely gruesome/disturbing scenes that might offend audiences/endanger the age rating they're going for
                you and pretty much every moron in this godforsaken thread implying that extended cuts are somehow "the original vision + pointless scenes" are actual imbeciles who don't understand that the so-called extended cuts/director's cut ARE the original fricking cut, you stupid bastards, they're the cuts the director came up with before the studio meddled
                even with a moron like snyder who sets out to make his director's cut in advance and just does the theatrical for the studio, it's not like he watches the theatrical and then decides to go back and fix it, the director's cut always precedes the theatrical release in 99% of cases
                and the few times where this doesn't happen, the times when director's go back to frick with the movie years or decades later (see, george and star wars) it's always a disaster
                extended cut is just a marketing way of saying there's more footage than what people saw in the cinemas, it doesn't mean some outsider willy-nilly added scenes that were purposefully ommitted

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it wasn't edited after the fact
                It was, the 144 version was edited first and released first. Read a wiki lmao

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i did and you didn't, which is why you're talking about some tv version that has nothing to do with anything
                there's only two versions, american and european, and both versions are approved by kubrick directly

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >and both versions are approved by kubrick directly
                Irrelevant to the question of which was edited and released first, go back and read the wiki or imdb again b***h boy lmao
                > After meeting with poor reviews and erratic box office, Kubrick decided to further edit the film for its theatrical release outside the US by cutting appr. 31 minutes of footage, reducing the length to 113 minutes
                Keyword AFTER, now go look at the dates and do some math boy

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i like how your source is so moronic and terrible that it doesn't even give the right amount of time that was cut away from the movie
                it's not 31 minutes, it's 23 minutes, maybe you should look at the runtime and do some math yourself, boy
                alternatively, you can rely on something that wasn't written by moronic pajeets or ai next time
                and the rest of that sentence is pure speculation, there's exactly 0 evidence that kubrick edited the film as a response to box office failure in the us, if you have any direct quotes, let's see them

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >WIKI AND IMDB ARE WRONG THEY WERE EDITED BY PAJEEEEEETTSS REEEEEEEEE
                I accept your concession
                >The film was released in the United States on May 23, 1980, and in the United Kingdom on October 2 by Warner Bros.
                was this made up by pajeets?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i mean, it is wrong, literally, go look at the runtimes
                i have no interest in discussing with a dumb Black person who can't get basic information right and then thinks the other person citing the right information is the one who is in the wrong

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >i mean, it is wrong, literally, go look at the runtimes
                The US version 144 and was released first, EU is 119 and was released after
                No amount of crying can change these facts, change your jammies and go to bed little boy

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the shining, kingdom of heaven, batman v superman, just off the top of my head

        >Dune 2 is already very long
        oh, and forgot to answer that
        that's because villeneuve is a Black person iq frenchman (likely a mutt) who decided to spend over 50% of the movie on netflix tier slop romance that was still unconvincing
        we needed a scene or two with chani at best, she's a completely marginal character in the original dune and certainly not more important than the fricking guild
        but sadly, villeneuve can only make slop, whether it's this, enemy, incendes, or whatever the frick else he's done, all slop

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          There are 2 shots of Paul and Chani together in the film.
          >enemy, incendes, or whatever the frick else he's done, all slop
          Ah I see, just moronic then.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They should have removed the three movie original action scenes, and the entire subplot about traveling south.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The first Blade Runner easily and it only takes one viewing of the original ending to see why.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The first Blade Runner easily and it only takes one viewing of the original ending to see why.

        I forgot Lord of The Rings being the easiest choice of them all but it’s so obvious that I forget

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Thufir's story in the book is one of my favourites. The thing is, Villeneuve already butchered the Yue storyline. The traitor plot is what drives it. It's probably why he cut smuggler and Thufir storylines.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Same thing with Chani: He basically cut Liet Kynes from part 1, and in part 2 Chani gets to be an "independent girl boss" for the sake of it.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The inverse would be a shorter list

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What do you expect from an extended cut?
      Another villain in The Dark Knight and another layer of dream in Inception?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sick of him and pseuds like Nolan who never releases cut scenes or bloopers. You're just making movies, not high art. Get off your high horse.

      A directors cut is only a thing if the Directors version was reduced and edited down by the studio.
      In Denis's case, he has full absolute control over Dune and what he released is his cut, not that of the studio.

      You morons really need to learn what a director cut is.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're such a fricking dumbshit moron. I'm surprised your mom let a turd like you suck on her breasts for as long as she did

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      T. Ridley Scott
      Most theatrical cuts are better

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sick of him and pseuds like Nolan who never releases cut scenes or bloopers. You're just making movies, not high art. Get off your high horse.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This. Nothing makes me appreciate fine music more than the fart blooper tracks

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Agreed. Even the memes from LOTR were great. PJ became a hack with the hobbit but he never took himself too seriously like Nolan and Denis.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dunc seethers being low iq extended cut fans makes a lot of sense.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dune: Christ when?

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They must have talked too much. The director is autistic and too much dialog hurts his brain

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The new dune movies is the literal definition of style over substance.

    Literal garbage that zoomers love just because of the style of the movie, just like the AI generated "balenziaga" bullshit that was pushed a few months ago.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    THANK YOU DENIS FOR DEDICATING 15 MINUTES OF THIS SLOP TO ZENDAYA AND TIMMY MAKING OUT INSTEAD OF THE STORY
    I LOVE RACEMIXING

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >*scowls at you in dysgenic mutt face for 20 minutes*
      AAAA ZENDAYA YOU ARE SIMPLY TOO GREAT AN ACTRESS MY DEAR

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If only morons cared about physical media again they would still get all kinds of extras, deleted scenes, interviews, behind the scenes, bloopers, etc.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The actors still got paid for their work regardless, but I understand their disappointment.
    What matters to me more than a directors cut is general access to the cut scenes.
    Less and less movies are being released on physical media with bonus content like cut scenes, and this worries me even more. One thing is not getting an extension cut of a movie, another is saying there exists a considerable amount of cut content and keeping that in a vault somewhere never for the public to see ever.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not only that but most of the BTS stuff is just shitty EPK (Electronic press kit) shite. Even though I don't like capeshit the first Iron Man (2008) documentary was actually pretty good.

      They hardly ever put out quality BTS stuff anymore. It's kinda depressing. Give credit to the actual crew who put up with the stars (who get treated the best on set).

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      imagine walking tens of miles doing this moronic crap

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        if you walk without rhythm, you won't attract the worm

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't know why Denis is so anti-Director's Cut. He did the same for Blade Runner 2049. On one hand, I respect his strict adherence vision. But movies are a collaborative effort, and tossing all the extra content away is a waste of effort and disappointing to the people whose work never made it to the screen.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Denis is a fricking frog.

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The film is tracking for $600M. It plus DUNC 1 together may not clear 1B. Its not getting an extended cut. Those are reserved for actual blockbusters.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    fricking pretentious gay.
    but if it's any consolation, extra footage rarely improves a movie. Even the Spicediver edit is a mess.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *