Which is more likely?
>In the film, Oppenheimer is shown as a brilliant scientist who is able to harness the power of the atom. However, in a twist of events, it is revealed that he is also a traitor who has been working with the Soviets.
>In Christopher Nolan's film "Oppenheimer", the plot twist is that the scientist Robert Oppenheimer is actually a German spy. This is revealed when he is arrested by the FBI and interrogated.
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
both are unlikely, but considering Oppenheimer was a israelite, spying for germany makes even less sense
>see ad for this in theatre
>some normie homosexual says that oppenheimer's a "rapist"
their entire morality is based around sex
He was not a soviet spy. He had an extra marital affair with a commie girl and I expect Nolan will probably portray her as Yuri from Command&Conquer.
Is this a real film? If so, it's confirmation of Nolan's glow-nig/freemason status: promoting fakes nukes just as awareness that they are fake is growing online. Now the younger gen will see a modern film about them and their minds will be lost to the nuke-psyop forever because they are dumb and easily manipulated.
You should probably just have a nice day
yeah, nukes are fake. Nato should defend ukraine NOW
Can I get a qrd on nukes being fake?
Start here:
part 1 of a six part series.
Then find that book I linked, it's on libgen.
Nuke bombs don't function as nuclear explosions. They way we know that they aare supposed to work, they would just melt in a big nuclear mess. Nuclear energy is real but it doesn't go boom. All Nuclear test explosions on films are fake and gay, propaganda films. That series of videos demonstrates this. You'll kick yourself when you see it, some of them were hilariously bad. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by Napalm and mustard gas over a period of days rather than by a nuke, and then a dirty bomb was detonated to give the effect of radiation, but it was nowhere near enough and too fleeting. There is a book about how all the victims have napalm and mustard gas injuries, not nuclear radiation burns. It's called "hiroshima revisited".
So basically every major power decided to not call each other's lie out? What about the Cuban Missile Crisis? Was it just a cover up for something else?
Only nine countries have purported to have nukes (not including Israel, though they've let the world know inadvertently that they are in on it) including North Korea and South Africa , bizarrely - and when you consider that most of the countries that have them are in NATO (Only Russia is not) it's not hard to see how they collaborate over this. Conflict between East and West has always been fake and gay. Orwell tried to tell us with 1984. People think it's fiction though.
South Africa was/is not a part of NATO and their weapon program was designed as an "insurance policy" tool for blackmail against both the West and USSR in case they lost control of black nationalist armed movements
>The DPRK is part of NATO
Juchebros... I don't feel so good
don't listen to the other anon upthread. He's quoting the popular psyop traps designed to catch the nukepilled. Nukes were invented in 1957 and if they were ever used, they would detonate the atmosphere and eradicate humanity. We only have them as part of a mutually-assured destruction deal with the aliens who got here in 55, after fleeing a destroyed homeworld. Try to find Mitchell Henderson's "Heros" series, but unless you have access to deepdark webs you probably can't find it.
>We only have them as part of a mutually-assured destruction deal with the aliens who got here in 55, after fleeing a destroyed homeworld.
I'm not moronic enough to believe in ayys, anon.
Yeah, I guess you've got a good point with the east/west tension being a false dialectic.
I know about Wall St. funding both the German NatSocs and Soviets. Honestly, it doesn't seem too far fetched that nukes aren't real. But some questions need to be answered like the Cuban Missile Crisis or all of the supposed test sites in the US or the sea.
What questions exactly?
Over 2000 nuclear tests have occurred in the world, surely we could find the devastated test sites. You'd think with all the nuclear physicists in the world, they would have explained they don't explode. The US government claims to have spent $44 billion on nukes, I guess they spent it on something else entirely? These are just random questions that popped into my head, but I'm sure if I thought long enough there would be major inconsistencies with your theory.
Like I said, it's not my theory and I'm not particularly interested in defending it, my own opinion is somewhere between yes and no.
for the sake of discussion, if you're saying "dude they spent $44 billions on nuke developments, do you really think they'd lie about spending taxpayer's money???" that seems pretty naive about how state run their affairs. the 2000 test sites are all beyond public reach. nuclear physicists are all compartmentalized and massively vetted beforehand, not the kind of people that would whistleblow about such an issue if it were indeed real.
The naive question would have some follow ups like the military getting audited or however finance works after 44 billion goes missing. There's test sites available to visit. Nuclear physicists are all in on the conspiracy is kind of a stretch, but i guess it's possible. I'm sure there's lots of models explaining and simulating nuclear explosions. But again, I don't know shit about this subject.
>The naive question would have some follow ups like the military getting audited or however finance works after 44 billion goes missing.
On September 10th, 2001, then Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld announced the Pentagon had lost $2,300,000,000,000. Tragically, just a day later, the wing of the Pentagon containing the accounting records would be destroyed in a terrorist attack.
the military getting financially audited, goddamn you're cute.
and again the physicists wouldn't need to be all in on the conspiracy if they each only have access to a tiny part of the picture. only a few at the very top would know the whole story and how it all fits together. and the NYTimes and Washington Post sure as shit wouldn't the publish the story on page 1 about nukes being fake if a whistleblower came forward to them.
like you I don't know much about the subject to talk about it in depth though, this is just playing conspiratorial devil's advocate and shitposting in passing.
by the way I'm not particularly interested in defending te nukes aren't real theory, I just wanted to answer the question as to why US or USSR wouldn't call each other's bullshit (because they benefit internally from it). I think the b***hute video that was posted is dumb but there's been some good questions raised about the concrete structures remaining standing near ground zero in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
not the person you were asking, but superpowers benefit from hyping up enemy state threats by controlling and keeping in line their own populations. wall street money propped up nazi germany and soviet union industries. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnoXDhbE6C8
not sure how the cuban missile crisis played into this exactly. both jfk and rfk were assassinated in the ensuing years anyways
And Khrushchev was couped and placed under house arrest for the rest of his life.
Makes you think.
Anon I’m gonna be honest with you, this is completely moronic
don't know why you would need a confirmation for this in 2022 considering his inorganic rise to prestige film director and the opportunities that were given to him.
>they are dumb and easily manipulated.
bro you don't think nukes are real
they're not real. It's a psyop invented in the 40's long before you were born. look at the footage - it's all an elaborate Hollywood style propaganda production. It's ridiculous. you'd never get away with it now, it's too obviously fake.
meds now
Nukes are not only real now, they have been real since the times of Mesopotamia
We´ve come a long way, dropping them from airplanes instead of using giant men.
Awww poor israelites had to bomb Japs instead of the Germans they really wanted to exterminate, they must've been seething.
>the Rosenbergs are painted as misunderstood heroes
Pass
>written for the screen
Calm the frick down, Nolan.