The Tasmanian aboriginal was seen as completely different to mainland aboriginals and lots of them were vivisected in the name of science. The very last full blooded Tasmanian Aboriginals last words on her death bed were "Don't let them cut me up." You can probably guess what they did next.
This is the type of sexy-sounding story that sets off one's bullshit alarm, and it's the type of thing where Wikipedia can actually be used as a starting point to get closer to the truth:
"For much of the 20th century, the Tasmanian Aboriginal people were widely, and erroneously, thought of as being an extinct cultural and ethnic group that had been intentionally exterminated by white settlers."
It was always a very small group, but disease seems to have been the main thing.
>She died in May 1876 and was buried at the former Female Factory at Cascades, a suburb of Hobart. Before her death, Truganini had pleaded to colonial authorities for a respectful burial, and requested that her ashes be scattered in the D'Entrecasteaux Channel. She feared that her body would be mutilated for perverse scientific purposes as William Lanne's had been.[11]
>Despite her wishes, within two years, her skeleton was exhumed by the Royal Society of Tasmania.[12] It was placed on public display in the Tasmanian Museum in 1904 where it remained until 1947.[13] Only in April 1976, approaching the centenary of her death, were Truganini's remains finally cremated and scattered according to her wishes.[14][15] In 2002, some of her hair and skin were found in the collection of the Royal College of Surgeons of England and returned to Tasmania for burial.[16]
2) As a consequence of 1), you have confounded a specific individual with a certain fantastical account of that individual. You have also posted the link as if to "win the argument", blithely ignoring that the details of the earlier claim are similar to, but do not line up with, what is actually reported (in Wikipedia, at least, for whatever that's worth). This is how misrepresentations spread: it sounds similar, but it's not the same thing. Like an urban legend. Uncritical minds conflate them.
3) The original claim speaks of VIVISECTION, literally cutting an animal/person up WHILE THEY ARE ALIVE. This is the most sensationalistic aspect of the original claim, and it is the one which is apparently false per Wiki. You have to be a real salty dog to do that to any human, more than most murderers. Most don't have what it takes, happily, and that's what makes the claim not credible.
4) It is true per the main article that they (the people) were objects/subjects of anthropological interest, and there was a certain market for skulls, body parts and so on. But vivisection is quite different from post-mortem dismemberment.
2) whoops vivisected was the wrong word, I just remember hearing in school how they would shoot some Tasmanians specifically dissect them. I used the wrong word. My bad.
3) I was never arguing or trying to win an argument, it was just from your post I was guessing you didn't see anything about the specific person I was referring to. You should give it a read its pretty interesting.
4) See 1) again. I don't know why you're so fricking hung up and argumentative over shit that, as you say, you can easily google and find out more, find out for sure or get clearer details of. I feel embarrassed writing out this much on my phone at night as you don't rightfully deserve a response for being such a cringe dumb c**t dripping at the tip for le internet arguments like you're used to on reddit comments.
It was the 1800s.
Saying the Abos were mistreated and “scientifically studied”, seems to imply this was some sort of racist discrimination.
The “scientific mistreatment” was hardly confined to Abos.
Anybody suffering from some weird disease might have been hauled off and confined during the time period.
Anybody who died with a weird disease might have found their human remains used for scientific study, with skeletons or other sections preserved or displayed in museums.
The United States Representative, and sone of President William Henry Harrison, John Scott Harrison’s body was actually stolen after death by grave robbers, and found at a medical college waiting for dissection.
That happened in the late 1870s.
During the US Civil War, people actually removed teeth from the bodies, so that the teeth could be used to make dentures.
There were multiple different ethnic aboriginal groups in Australia,
including a group of Pygmy sized individuals that lived in one of the Forested areas.
It seems to be easier to mention the widely different ethnic groups in Africa nowadays, than it does to mention widely different ethnic groups in Australia.
Can you give me sauce? I'm Aussoid and I've always wondered about this. Am skeptical about the claim that Abos have been chilling here for 60,000 years - I'm sure there were separate waves of migration from New Guinea and Indonesia over the Millenia.
NTA but
https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/history-wars/2002/06/the-extinction-of-the-australian-pygmies/
There is also Mungo Man, the oldest human remains found who clustered separately from aboriginals which was immediately criticised by the media for implying the aboriginals weren't harmonious natives but curiously wasn't allowed retesting until decades of politicisation later, where we've been told no he was actually aboriginal nothing to see here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_wars >"The Black Armband view of history might well represent the swing of the pendulum from a position that had been too favourable, too self-congratulatory, to an opposite extreme that is even more unreal and decidedly jaundiced."
You have to be especially stringent when reading about Colonial-Aboriginal history as it's been utterly israelited by people like ~~*pic*~~.
neat film. I think I watched it for free on Youtube several years back at a point in my life when I was a NEET. Looking back, I think that was the happiest I'd ever been.
I would like to think that neanderthals would be a nice people considering they were less social and agressive than homosexual sapiens but considering that abbos are the closest thing we have I am doubting it.
Aboriginals are practically completely unrelated to Neanderthals. They've been so isolated in terms of genetics they're totally unique. A Polynesian new Zealander is more closely related to Scandanavians than aboriginals are to any other race.
That's why I said the closest we have. It was hypothesised that they derive their archaic features from Denisovans which are the cousins of Neanderthals. Now it's disputet but it's clear they have some archaic admixture.
Aboriginals are practically completely unrelated to Neanderthals. They've been so isolated in terms of genetics they're totally unique. A Polynesian new Zealander is more closely related to Scandanavians than aboriginals are to any other race.
the matrix
What would a caveman do with a trans allegory?
We don't appreciate your condescending attitude. When the Geico rep tried to make it up to me, I just refused to eat and stared him down.
The Tasmanian aboriginal was seen as completely different to mainland aboriginals and lots of them were vivisected in the name of science. The very last full blooded Tasmanian Aboriginals last words on her death bed were "Don't let them cut me up." You can probably guess what they did next.
Did they cut her up?
They said it's just a prank bro and threw bucket of confetti all over her?
This is the type of sexy-sounding story that sets off one's bullshit alarm, and it's the type of thing where Wikipedia can actually be used as a starting point to get closer to the truth:
"For much of the 20th century, the Tasmanian Aboriginal people were widely, and erroneously, thought of as being an extinct cultural and ethnic group that had been intentionally exterminated by white settlers."
It was always a very small group, but disease seems to have been the main thing.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truganini
>She died in May 1876 and was buried at the former Female Factory at Cascades, a suburb of Hobart. Before her death, Truganini had pleaded to colonial authorities for a respectful burial, and requested that her ashes be scattered in the D'Entrecasteaux Channel. She feared that her body would be mutilated for perverse scientific purposes as William Lanne's had been.[11]
>Despite her wishes, within two years, her skeleton was exhumed by the Royal Society of Tasmania.[12] It was placed on public display in the Tasmanian Museum in 1904 where it remained until 1947.[13] Only in April 1976, approaching the centenary of her death, were Truganini's remains finally cremated and scattered according to her wishes.[14][15] In 2002, some of her hair and skin were found in the collection of the Royal College of Surgeons of England and returned to Tasmania for burial.[16]
1) You are a stupid phoneposter.
2) As a consequence of 1), you have confounded a specific individual with a certain fantastical account of that individual. You have also posted the link as if to "win the argument", blithely ignoring that the details of the earlier claim are similar to, but do not line up with, what is actually reported (in Wikipedia, at least, for whatever that's worth). This is how misrepresentations spread: it sounds similar, but it's not the same thing. Like an urban legend. Uncritical minds conflate them.
3) The original claim speaks of VIVISECTION, literally cutting an animal/person up WHILE THEY ARE ALIVE. This is the most sensationalistic aspect of the original claim, and it is the one which is apparently false per Wiki. You have to be a real salty dog to do that to any human, more than most murderers. Most don't have what it takes, happily, and that's what makes the claim not credible.
4) It is true per the main article that they (the people) were objects/subjects of anthropological interest, and there was a certain market for skulls, body parts and so on. But vivisection is quite different from post-mortem dismemberment.
1) calm down moron
2) whoops vivisected was the wrong word, I just remember hearing in school how they would shoot some Tasmanians specifically dissect them. I used the wrong word. My bad.
3) I was never arguing or trying to win an argument, it was just from your post I was guessing you didn't see anything about the specific person I was referring to. You should give it a read its pretty interesting.
4) See 1) again. I don't know why you're so fricking hung up and argumentative over shit that, as you say, you can easily google and find out more, find out for sure or get clearer details of. I feel embarrassed writing out this much on my phone at night as you don't rightfully deserve a response for being such a cringe dumb c**t dripping at the tip for le internet arguments like you're used to on reddit comments.
It was the 1800s.
Saying the Abos were mistreated and “scientifically studied”, seems to imply this was some sort of racist discrimination.
The “scientific mistreatment” was hardly confined to Abos.
Anybody suffering from some weird disease might have been hauled off and confined during the time period.
Anybody who died with a weird disease might have found their human remains used for scientific study, with skeletons or other sections preserved or displayed in museums.
The United States Representative, and sone of President William Henry Harrison, John Scott Harrison’s body was actually stolen after death by grave robbers, and found at a medical college waiting for dissection.
That happened in the late 1870s.
During the US Civil War, people actually removed teeth from the bodies, so that the teeth could be used to make dentures.
Even in the US in the 1940s and 50s they were stealing bodies of people who died to radiation or nuclear accidents
>at the former Female Factory
glad they shut that place down
There were multiple different ethnic aboriginal groups in Australia,
including a group of Pygmy sized individuals that lived in one of the Forested areas.
It seems to be easier to mention the widely different ethnic groups in Africa nowadays, than it does to mention widely different ethnic groups in Australia.
Can you give me sauce? I'm Aussoid and I've always wondered about this. Am skeptical about the claim that Abos have been chilling here for 60,000 years - I'm sure there were separate waves of migration from New Guinea and Indonesia over the Millenia.
Don't google the Mungo man
NTA but
https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/history-wars/2002/06/the-extinction-of-the-australian-pygmies/
There is also Mungo Man, the oldest human remains found who clustered separately from aboriginals which was immediately criticised by the media for implying the aboriginals weren't harmonious natives but curiously wasn't allowed retesting until decades of politicisation later, where we've been told no he was actually aboriginal nothing to see here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_wars
>"The Black Armband view of history might well represent the swing of the pendulum from a position that had been too favourable, too self-congratulatory, to an opposite extreme that is even more unreal and decidedly jaundiced."
You have to be especially stringent when reading about Colonial-Aboriginal history as it's been utterly israelited by people like ~~*pic*~~.
This is why I support wh*te genocide.
if you hate whites then stop using all white inventions (that includes your computer, electricity, your clothes, car, cooker, etc)
none of those thing were invented by nordics whites
lmfo neither did the shit people.
lmfao, whites invented NONE of that
We're going to cut you up Black person
vivisected or dissected? pretty big difference
Basically as a reminder to never yearn for civilization
neat film. I think I watched it for free on Youtube several years back at a point in my life when I was a NEET. Looking back, I think that was the happiest I'd ever been.
Zardoz
The gods must be crazy.
I think he'll relate.
he monke
Rvturn
Abboham Missing Linkoln
Encinitas Man of course
*Encino Man
That’s what I get for being a phonegay
Enchiladas, man
>what am i wearing
>whats that thing they're pointing at me
>where am i
Abbos are their own race, one of the main 5.
I would like to think that neanderthals would be a nice people considering they were less social and agressive than homosexual sapiens but considering that abbos are the closest thing we have I am doubting it.
Just give them alcohol and they will leave you alone
>Australian aboriginals are the closest thing to a subspecies that developper and existed only in europe.
Bruh
I thought everyone had DNA from neanderthals aside from Subsaharan Africans
That's why I said the closest we have. It was hypothesised that they derive their archaic features from Denisovans which are the cousins of Neanderthals. Now it's disputet but it's clear they have some archaic admixture.
Aboriginals are practically completely unrelated to Neanderthals. They've been so isolated in terms of genetics they're totally unique. A Polynesian new Zealander is more closely related to Scandanavians than aboriginals are to any other race.
Sausage Party
Taxi Driver
These guys apparently lost the ability to make fire at one point.
He looks like a great guy no cap
Boku no pico.