Which on-screen Batman and Superman are the best, outfit-wise?

It's from one of the most iconic comics ever made.

Pattinson copers are so pathetic. This is not a bloated mess.

>"Murderspree" lol. He lets two guys die by their own grenade and kills just one guy.
And torches the main goon. And nukes everyone outside.

Outside he explodes the guys in the cars shooting at him, but inside the warehouse he only kills the Russian.

You called the warehouse scene, in which he kills one guy, a "murderspree." Besides, it's time to grow out of "Batman NEVER le kills." Snyder was right.

>The artist doesn't even know basic anatomy
As opposed to most comicbook artists.
> not that he's le accurate
The other anon claimed it's ripped straight from comics and they're right. Comicgays like you like to play fast and loose with what counts and doesn't count as comic accuracy to suit your narrative. You should've just said the art in the comic is shit in the first place instead of denying it. Let me jog your memory.
>>, visually he's straight off the page.
>Not really.

Here's a "better" drawn big Batman. Stop coping.

>Most of them exaggerate fetures, give character unrealistic heroic features.
That more often than not look ridiculous.
> You are trying to justify bad live action design comparing it to a badly drawn blob.
I gave you multiple panels where TDKR Batman looks less sleek than Batfleck. So it's not just one blob. Just admit it's comic accurate but the comic it's using as a source has bad art. Just say it, we'll end the discussion here.

>"Murderspree" lol. He lets two guys die by their own grenade and kills just one guy.
And torches the main goon. And nukes everyone outside.

Yeah, sure. I wouldn't call Batfleck ridiculous when Pattinson is like this.

>Alright bud. Sure.
Glad, we agree.
> You're gonna tell me there's no Batman specific threads?
Hello, ESL pajeet. That's not what that passage means. Read this again, especially the first sentence.
> People criticize anons copying insults all the time saying "You're just going n-no u". It's not even Batman specific threads newfag.
> No. I don't see their writing style here.
Thanks for confirming you're a schizo.

>Me too
Good. Take your meds now.
> I know. I said what it was about.
You didn't. I'll give you one more opportunity to read it again and tell me what it means. Hint: It isn't saying there are no Batman specific threads.
> Concession accepted, again.
Are you talk to your imaginary friends again?

>Damn. Talk about cliche.
But true nonetheless. You need to take your meds.
> I did.
Then why didn't you understand it pajeet? I said (and it's very clear) that anons accuse each other of committing "n-no u" retorts all the time and not just in Batman specific threads. Yet, in your ESL brain it got mangled into "no batman specific threads". HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Literal, pajeet tier reading comprehension. And btw, here's an example anons doing it. Took me less than a minute.
I did.
https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/185291581/#q185303841
> No. I'm talking to you.
Well, I never said anything about conceding. It's fair to assume you probably imagined it.

>Midwits confuse truth with lies.
You're a dimwit schizo who's out of touch with reality.
> So, I did in fact know what I was referring to. And that it wasn't about Batman threads.
Is English really that hard pajeet? The point is simple.
1) N-no u has being pointed out in multiple threads. It's common in Cinemaphile. Not just Batman specific threads.
2) You can look into those instances to see its actual definition.

Being the ESL pajeet you're, you failed at this simple task. That I was able to do im under a minute. Sad. All because you couldn't read one(1) sentence properly.
>Damn. Take some meds.
>Anyway, I know this kind of posting.
>You're mad. Ooh you're angry.
>Perturbed fingers desperate for a >"gotcha" typed those words.
>I'm in your head now.
>There isn't much in here though.
>Never said you did.
>Your arguments give it away.
>No one who believes they're winning >seethes as much as you.
>You're my monkey.
>You do as I say.
>Reply to me monkey.
>Reply again.
LMAO, Not only is this great spergout, you're so desperate to get the last word you're trying the "If you respond you lose" tactic that literal grade schoolers use. Holy, kek this is hilarious.

>Yes! My monkey obeys!
SEETHING
> A bit dull I'd say.
You're a bit more than dull. Everyone can see that, kek.
> I already acknowledged this. You struggle with reading.
You didn't. If you did, you wouldn't have responded with this.
> You're gonna tell me there's no Batman specific threads?
What I said was clear cut to anyone but pajeets.
> I come from a place with two.
Unless, that place is reddit. There's only one definition. I guess this confirms you're from reddit.
> Projecting now?
What's there to project? Checking the archives is an easy task, unlike those non-existent surveys.
>You don't lose.
But you do. That's why you sperg out whenever someone mocks the Batman. You always take Ls and you're desperate for a W. That's why you'll keep responding.

He looks like a drug addict cosplayer with bad teeth. I remember when the trailer came out and everyone was clowning on his teeth and stupid "angry" expression. The whole scene is just a shitty copy of the TDK scene.

Nah, they are pretty bad. But everyone was making fun of his unintelligible grunting. This movie is an unintentional comedy.

I've seen this before. Where is it from? I've seen multiple people say that the audience laughed at some parts of the movie. Riddler especially was so bad I couldn't believe it.

I like BvS, but even I can admit that Lex was subpar. You're just a shill who pretends this was a perfect movie. Riddler was beyond cringe. The fans of this movie were lulled into believing it is high art because it has some pretty pictures. The writing and acting are fucking terrible. But as long as there's a hecking cool pointless Batmobile chase, it's all good to brainlets.

Thanks.

Almost everyone who watched the film with me thought Dano was terrible. Especially his video messages.

The opening scene wasn't bad. It's when they allowed Dano to speak it went downhill.

Nah they're not.
Glad we settled that.
>Everyone was
Nah they weren't. I never saw it.
>unintentional comedy
Nah it has comedy on purpose.
So if you laughed during any scene in the film, you fed into the fact that it had comedic scenes, therefore confirming it set out to complete its mission.
I'm glad we settled this.

The problem with the fake pectorals Pattison's wearing is that it is too angular. It reminds me of those bras Madonna would wear.
Male pectorals should look more like two squares.

Pattison's armor genuinely look like what a female hero would wear. The fake pectorais have the shape of triangles. That's not how male pectorials are meant to look.

Dude, his armor is very feminine looking. It feels like i am constantly seeing the underside of his female tits. It should look blocky, but instead it looks like some torpedo tits.

Disagree, the fake pectorals from the Affleck's suit actually look like big squares, very akin to Roman suits.
The problem with Pattison's suit is that it is too pointy. You've an angular shape, with the center pointing outwards. That's why it looks like torpedo tits.

>Torpedo tits have nipples right in the center.
That's the impression Pattison's suit give because right at the center you've this pointy mass. That's why it looks like torpedo tits. I don't know why they decided to make the fake pectorals look like pyramids. Pyramids reminds me of giant tits.

The red dots circles look like female nipples on top of big torpedo tits. You can say that they're sagging a bit, but that's it.

>You're just describing male pecs.
Too pointy to be male pecs. Men don't have pointy as fuck nipples. That's the issue. The pecs are too angular. It ends up looking very feminine because of it.

Why would I be angry?
Torpedo tits have an equal angle that leads to a nip directly in the center.
Pattinson's nip is at the bottom, not the center.
It isn't sagging, because torpedo tits don't sag.
It's just the male chest.
Call it a male torpedo tit if you want, but it logically cannot be female.

Same for this.
Tits don't become angular triangles at the bottom, and female superhero costumes have rounded bottom for the breasts because breasts aren't geometric like pectorals.
Both look manly. Neither look feminine.

Boobs don't have flat slabs under them.

Squares are geometric, but so are pyramids and cones and bras have been made in that shape.

And yet pyramids and cones don't have sharp edges.

>Pattinson's nip is at the bottom, not the center.
The problem is that the "bottom" isn't low enough, it is almost close to the center and thus looks very feminine. Check my pic. The nip line should be at the showed with the blue color, but Pattison's nip line is way up high. It is also too angular where the nip line is very pointy. Like he has a permanent hard nipple.

Pattinson's nips are at the right level.

Sorry, they're not. And if he does have tits, so does Affleck's.
Where do we go from here?

I already did. I made two markups.

Fuck I meant cones don't have sharp edges.
Pyramids do. But there aren't pyramid bras.
Plus, Pattinson's pyramid is only on the nipple, like Affleck's.

Sorry dude.
They're on the right level, kek.

Nice try, but they're more aligned with the red than the blue.
Just admit it. He doesn't have tits.

>N-n-now I'm gonna make the new spots blue so I win!
Nice try.
If we're judging by closer, and if they're not perfectly aligned then we are, I obviously win.
Anyway, here's one clean of marking.
Even the bodies match, kek.

>Placing the nipples way too high
If they're way too high then why do the bodies match? Why does the arm fit perfectly to Pattinson? If the nipples were off, wouldn't the arm be off too?
Keep the cope comin'.
Pattinson doesn't have tits and I proved it.
Move on with your life man. This lolcow posting is getting sad.

I dismissed it outright a while ago.
I'll dismiss it again. They aren't.
But you must know I'm right deep down.
Or you wouldn't have kept replying.

>tits
what boobs look like this?
hunter Schafer tits maybe

bro added a line right in the midle to make it look like boobs, lol

Batfleck's pecs aren't shaped like pyramids. They're shaped like human pecs, fake as they are, and they're shaped as squares most importantly.

Pattison's pecs are shaped like pyramids. The center points outwards. Everything is too clean cut and angular for comfort. It ends up looking very "V" like and thus feminine.

they both have pyramids solely to the nipples, like ladies do, but it's the placement that defines men to women chests.

>gen x’ers leaked their cream into their club spandex for this hag

>snydroids still under massive delusions

I am so glad his shitty project is dead.

No he doesn't. I know what panel of the panel you are talking about and that has been debunked by Miller.

Isn't it stated that those are rubber bullets and concussion grenades? Also, if he does indeed kill, that automatically makes it the worst batman comic. Batman not killing is the one rule. If you want a batman that kills, go read Punisher.

>head looks swollen
Nah it doesn't.
>cowl is retard
Nah it's cool.
>water head indeed
Are you a Brit?

I dislike every live action joker performance.

Remember, The Batman is considered an overly serious and comically bad attempt at aping Fincher. This is either considered mid or terrible with the exception of a handful of Gen Z retards who pretend they know comics.

>everyone else loves it.
Everyone else forgot about it.

It is the most comic accurate interpretation. Accept in one department- aesthetics. Batman Returns feels like the comics.

>Aesthetics
> Burton
As I said. You're a zoomie who doesn't know anything. Burton's aesthetic wasn't comic accurate. He was just doing what he does in every other film i.e ape German expressionism and give it a more gothic aesthetic. It was such a success that it future comics and cartoons like BTAS copied them. Comics became Burton accurate not the other way around.

I can guarantee Gothic wasn't in the vocabulary of the average Batman nerd before Burton.

>Lemurman
Already disproven. Many bats have wings which connect at the feet.
And, Batman knew Spanish.

Still looks more like a lemur than a bat, kek.

A film can look like Chicago, LA, New York and still be great. Heat, Se7en, Chinatown, and so many other crime flicks take place in regular cities and still give a distinct atmosphere. It's all in the hands of the director. There's a reason anyone who has seen Heat can feel it in TDK and it's not due to the plot.

The dogmatic expectation that every filmmaker to stick to Burton aesthetics which while great is silly.

It is the most comic accurate interpretation. Accept in one department- aesthetics. Batman Returns feels like the comics.

> Still more detective.
Neither is Lemurman. A local beat cop could've solved the case in 2 days.

What do you have against this movie? Are you upset Ben Affleck got canned?

What do you have against this movie? Are you upset Ben Affleck got canned?

I'm not Snyder fan and while I don't care if you nerds shill your mediocre Batshit, I just want to remind you that you should keep Nolan and Burton's films out of your mouths.

Keep your console wars to Snydershit.

The only way Reeves will have 2 more good batman movies is if he stears clear of the Joker. Joker fatigue has set in. Even in the comics. It's cringey how everytime the joker appear in the comics, the writer feels the need to one-up the violence of his previous appearance.

>No he has one.
>You just miscounted
He has Zero(0). You have terrible taste. Not easy to recognize for midwits.

>Subjective
>Subjective
Congratulations on figuring out a basic element of cinema. Film is subjective which is why most people yawn or laugh at your mediocre flick, why /misc/ shits on it 24/7 while a handful of you desperately try to defend it.

>Find me 10,000 people who hate it.
Do they make surveys for this kind of thing?
>>that's why /misc/ hates it because /misc/ is the whole population.
Are you a pajeet? Seems like you can't comprehend basic English.

>You said everyone forgot about it.
I don't have to provide stats because they don't make stats for this. But I can look at the general discourse(which all but disappeared 1 month after release)and boxoffice performance to make a good guess 🙂

>My friends still talk about it.
>Guess people didn't forget.
Are these friends in the room with us right now?
> It made more for WB than BvS.
It made more profits* but that's due to budget. It had a less overall gross and much lower ticket sales. It's telling that BvS is considered a near universally reviled movie with terrible audience reception and yet was seen by more people.

>No they're at their respective homes/apartments.
Decent world building you got there in your mind.
> We were talking about the amount who hated The Batman.
Read jeet, Read.
> Film is subjective which is why most people yawn or laugh at your mediocre flick.
It means people either hated it or were bored by it. Your film is a non-factor.

>Midwits often confuse reality for fantasy.
You're so close to self-awareness, yet still coming up short. So sad.
> But you're assigning an opinion you can't prove.
I did. You just don't want to accept the evidence I'm showing you. The fact all you can do it bring up "me and muh friends discuss it" as a counter argument to its near disappearance from pop culture discourse is hilarious to say the least.

Tie Between TDK and Mask of The Phantasm.

The only Batman film to have a great romance.

>You're so close
And yet you grow further still
>I've provided proof
No, you haven't. Just words. I've got 10,000 people backing me.
>Your friends
And 10,000 people.
Did you forget about them?
The 10,000 people?
Unless you're going to argue they all forgot about it?
Kek. Good luck.

>No u is weak
Like saying my friends don't exist when I say they do?
Midwits don't know when they're being hypocritical, I don't blame you.
>World building is more elaborate
See

>minimum of 10,000 people forgot about this movie I'm talking about because...I don't like it!

>Did you have a seizure? An-
Blah, blah not an argument.
We done?

>You don't know what no u is!
I do actually.
It's when someone says something, and the response is merely an insult or a repeat of what they've said directed at them.
I say
>I have friends
And you say
>No you're delusional
Pretty weak.
>Yeah it's an insult.
Good. Not an argument. Glad we agree.
Why add it then?
No one seems to be laughing at your mocking.

>It's hilarious that something that simple-
Except I already said that.
I gave both definitions.
The simple repeat, and when insults include "no u" as a lead in.
You can't read?
>Because you deserve to be-
Insults fly when proof runs dry.
It was inevitable. You were just against too much.
Don't worry man. I'll put in a good word for you during your next argument.
I accept your concession.

There's no definitions where I come from.
>Why do you think-
I explained why. You really can't read?
>Check the archives!
Quid pro quo anon. I'm still waiting for your 10,000.
Anyway, I trust my past more than anonymous posts.
>You're being mocked-
Another angry rant. Oo wee you're a funny sap.
I forgot how fun it was to milk replies from lolcows.

>There's no definitions where I come from.
The mental asylum?
> Quid pro quo anon. I'm still waiting for your 10,000.
No surveys exist but you can check the archives. Unless, of course you're too dumb for that as well.
> I forgot how fun it was to milk replies from lolcows.
Oh definitively, you're totally enjoying this argument. Just like you enjoy arguing 24/7 trying to convince people here that the Batman isn't absolute utter crap in every thread to no avail, kek.

>Already fixed the mistake. Invalid response.
Don't care. Unless, the place you come from is reddit there's only one definition.
> I've been on many threads like this.
Tsk, Tsk, Lazy, Lazy. People criticize anons copying insults all the time saying "You're just going n-no u". It's not even Batman specific threads newfag.
> I know man. I said I was.
Oh I totally believe you, kek
> Believe me, I've convinced a few.
Are they in the room with us right now?

>court of owls
The more I hear about this the more retarded it sounds
I hate the retcon shit they do to add bullshit to already established origins. Like that Gotham show to make everyone know each other since the beginning even though a lot of villains traditionally have origins after Bruce Wayne becomes batman.

Ending the sequel with the Court's reveal and the third dealing with it would be cool.

>Reeves will have three
Is he going to make 4 films then? Because he doesn't even have 1 so far.

Zach Snyder's daughter wasn't laughing lmao