Which on-screen Batman and Superman are the best, outfit-wise?

Which on-screen Batman and Superman are the best, outfit-wise?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous
  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Batman
    Keaton and Batfleck take it. They're the least janky looking and actually feel like comic book characters brought to life. They look the most like "Batman". That said, I do like the tacticool shit on Bale.

    >Superman
    Christopher Reeve far and away. The best version of the classic suit. As Gunn said, no frills. He wears it with the most confidence too.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Batmin should not look like a pitbull

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Everything here is correct except you through in Batfleck for some godforsaken reason.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        As much as I don't like the actual take on the character, visually he's straight off the page. Which is what the thread is about.

        >Batman
        Batfleck played a great Bruce Wayne, took the character seriously despite the scripts being no so helpful. His suits were also pretty great and the most varied while still staying true to the comics.

        >Superman

        Reeves Superman is quite possibly the best portrayal of a comic book her on film. He was a medicore actor but all his talents were perfect for both playing Kent and Superman perfectly. He did minimal steroids and its the only suit thats totally unforgiving but as a viewer you believe he is Superman despite being just a normie linebacker instead of a wacked out bodybuilder. Its just works and still does, Hollywood should take note.

        As far as I'm concerned West, Bale and Keaton are the only live action Batmans who matter. The rest were in shitty movies. Batfleck probably could've worked under better direction and with a better story. His own Batman would've been probably a lot better than the Pattinson shit. I appreciate the 3 for different reasons. My Batman is Bale, but I think Keaton is probably the best. West kind of owns it like Connery owns Bond.

        Christopher Reeve as Superman remains untouched. As much as people will always want to dethrone him, they only prove it by returning to him for a point of comparison. He's the definitive Superman.

        But also this thread was about the costumes.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >, visually he's straight off the page.
          Not really. He's too bloated. Only good thing about him is the costume texture. That's it

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Not really. He's too bloated.
            He actually looks sleeker than the comic that it's based off.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              That's a grotesque caricature and Affleck looks like an overweight dude inside a muscle suit too small for him. In the overrated warehouse murderspree he looks like a gorilla

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's from one of the most iconic comics ever made.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, I've read it, like most people. The artist doesn't even know basic anatomy therefore when you compare to a person yo uare actually saying that that person is a bloated mess, not that he's le accurate.
                Also please don't compare snydershit to Miller

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Pattinson copers are so pathetic. This is not a bloated mess.

                >"Murderspree" lol. He lets two guys die by their own grenade and kills just one guy.
                And torches the main goon. And nukes everyone outside.

                Outside he explodes the guys in the cars shooting at him, but inside the warehouse he only kills the Russian.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Not a fan of Patterson, sorry to disappoint
                >he only kills half the guys when hes' not killing all the other guys
                Ok

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                You called the warehouse scene, in which he kills one guy, a "murderspree." Besides, it's time to grow out of "Batman NEVER le kills." Snyder was right.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                Hey ma look!
                Magic abs!
                They appear on close ups and disappear in wide shots!

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The artist doesn't even know basic anatomy
                As opposed to most comicbook artists.
                > not that he's le accurate
                The other anon claimed it's ripped straight from comics and they're right. Comichomosexuals like you like to play fast and loose with what counts and doesn't count as comic accuracy to suit your narrative. You should've just said the art in the comic is shit in the first place instead of denying it. Let me jog your memory.
                >>, visually he's straight off the page.
                >Not really.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >>The artist doesn't even know basic anatomy
                >As opposed to most comicbook artists.
                Yes. Most of them exaggerate fetures, give character unrealistic heroic features. Their style have structure.
                >> not that he's le accurate
                >The other a...
                >>>, visually he's straight off the page.
                >>Not really.
                Becasue he's not stright form the comics. You are trying to justify bad live action design comparing it to a badly drawn blob.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Here's a "better" drawn big Batman. Stop coping.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                You posted a great Batman image, and he looks nothing like the gorilla in the movie.
                Thanks for agreeing at last

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Most of them exaggerate fetures, give character unrealistic heroic features.
                That more often than not look ridiculous.
                > You are trying to justify bad live action design comparing it to a badly drawn blob.
                I gave you multiple panels where TDKR Batman looks less sleek than Batfleck. So it's not just one blob. Just admit it's comic accurate but the comic it's using as a source has bad art. Just say it, we'll end the discussion here.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                "Murderspree" lol. He lets two guys die by their own grenade and kills just one guy.

                >Clooney 2.0 mogs
                OK

                How is he like Clooney at all? Clooney was actually a decent Bruce Wayne, but nowhere near as good as fleck.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >"Murderspree" lol. He lets two guys die by their own grenade and kills just one guy.
                And torches the main goon. And nukes everyone outside.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >How is he like Clooney at all?
                Becasue he's ridiculous. At least Clooney was in a comedy movie

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, sure. I wouldn't call Batfleck ridiculous when Pattinson is like this.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                Damn he looks cool.

                >Already fixed the mistake. Invalid response.
                Don't care. Unless, the place you come from is reddit there's only one definition.
                > I've been on many threads like this.
                Tsk, Tsk, Lazy, Lazy. People criticize anons copying insults all the time saying "You're just going n-no u". It's not even Batman specific threads newbie.
                > I know man. I said I was.
                Oh I totally believe you, kek
                > Believe me, I've convinced a few.
                Are they in the room with us right now?

                >There's only one definition!
                Alright bud. Sure.
                >It's not even Batman specific-
                You're gonna tell me there's no Batman specific threads?
                Or do I think I was referring to "no u" still?
                Oh. You did.
                Poor reading comprehension friend.
                >I totally believe you
                Good. See, you know I'm right. Look how much we've agreed on!
                >Are they in the room?
                No. I don't see their writing style here.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Alright bud. Sure.
                Glad, we agree.
                > You're gonna tell me there's no Batman specific threads?
                Hello, ESL pajeet. That's not what that passage means. Read this again, especially the first sentence.
                > People criticize anons copying insults all the time saying "You're just going n-no u". It's not even Batman specific threads newbie.
                > No. I don't see their writing style here.
                Thanks for confirming you're a schizo.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                >Glad we agree
                Me too.
                >That's not what the passage was-
                I know. I said what it was about.
                Now I'm concerned. No more jokes.
                Can you actually not read?
                >Thanks for confirming you're a schizo-
                Concession accepted, again.
                Are we done?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Me too
                Good. Take your meds now.
                > I know. I said what it was about.
                You didn't. I'll give you one more opportunity to read it again and tell me what it means. Hint: It isn't saying there are no Batman specific threads.
                > Concession accepted, again.
                Are you talk to your imaginary friends again?

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                >Take your meds
                Damn. Talk about cliche.
                >You didn't.
                I did.
                In fact, I REALLY did.
                And since you can't find it, I'm now convinced you cannot in fact read.
                >Talking to imaginary-
                No. I'm talking to you.
                moron.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Damn. Talk about cliche.
                But true nonetheless. You need to take your meds.
                > I did.
                Then why didn't you understand it pajeet? I said (and it's very clear) that anons accuse each other of committing "n-no u" retorts all the time and not just in Batman specific threads. Yet, in your ESL brain it got mangled into "no batman specific threads". HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Literal, pajeet tier reading comprehension. And btw, here's an example anons doing it. Took me less than a minute.
                I did.
                https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/185291581/#q185303841
                > No. I'm talking to you.
                Well, I never said anything about conceding. It's fair to assume you probably imagined it.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                >But true
                Midwits confuse truth with lies.
                I'll help you get back on track.
                It luckily is not true.
                >Then why didn't you-

                Damn he looks cool.
                [...]
                >There's only one definition!
                Alright bud. Sure.
                >It's not even Batman specific-
                You're gonna tell me there's no Batman specific threads?
                Or do I think I was referring to "no u" still?
                Oh. You did.
                Poor reading comprehension friend.
                >I totally believe you
                Good. See, you know I'm right. Look how much we've agreed on!
                >Are they in the room?
                No. I don't see their writing style here.

                Look I say
                >Did you think I was still referring to "no u"
                So, I did in fact know what I was referring to. And that it wasn't about Batman threads.
                Your moronation didn't allow you to see this.
                >HAHAHAHAHA
                Damn. Take some meds.
                Anyway, I know this kind of posting.
                You're mad. Ooh you're angry.
                Perturbed fingers desperate for a "gotcha" typed those words.
                I'm in your head now.
                There isn't much in here though.
                >Well I never said anything about-
                Never said you did.
                Your arguments give it away.
                No one who believes they're winning seethes as much as you.
                You're my monkey.
                You do as I say.
                Reply to me monkey.
                Reply again.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Midwits confuse truth with lies.
                You're a dimwit schizo who's out of touch with reality.
                > So, I did in fact know what I was referring to. And that it wasn't about Batman threads.
                Is English really that hard pajeet? The point is simple.
                1) N-no u has being pointed out in multiple threads. It's common in Cinemaphile. Not just Batman specific threads.
                2) You can look into those instances to see its actual definition.

                Being the ESL pajeet you're, you failed at this simple task. That I was able to do im under a minute. Sad. All because you couldn't read one(1) sentence properly.
                >Damn. Take some meds.
                >Anyway, I know this kind of posting.
                >You're mad. Ooh you're angry.
                >Perturbed fingers desperate for a >"gotcha" typed those words.
                >I'm in your head now.
                >There isn't much in here though.
                >Never said you did.
                >Your arguments give it away.
                >No one who believes they're winning >seethes as much as you.
                >You're my monkey.
                >You do as I say.
                >Reply to me monkey.
                >Reply again.
                LMAO, Not only is this great spergout, you're so desperate to get the last word you're trying the "If you respond you lose" tactic that literal grade schoolers use. Holy, kek this is hilarious.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                Yes! My monkey obeys!
                >you're a dimwit-
                A bit dull I'd say.
                >No u has been pointed out-
                I already acknowledged this. You struggle with reading. We know.
                >You can look into those to find a definition-
                I come from a place with two. Already acknowledged it. If you can't believe it, tough luck.
                >you failed a simple task-
                Projecting now?
                I'm still waiting on the 10,000 AND for you to find out I already touched on everything you've wasted three replies on.
                >if you respond you lose tactic
                You don't lose.
                Monkeys don't lose.
                I want you to finally give me what you said you could deliver. That's why you're my monkey.
                Someone as smart as you would know that giving up now without ever showing any proof would be embarrassing.
                To waste all that anger.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Yes! My monkey obeys!
                SEETHING
                > A bit dull I'd say.
                You're a bit more than dull. Everyone can see that, kek.
                > I already acknowledged this. You struggle with reading.
                You didn't. If you did, you wouldn't have responded with this.
                > You're gonna tell me there's no Batman specific threads?
                What I said was clear cut to anyone but pajeets.
                > I come from a place with two.
                Unless, that place is reddit. There's only one definition. I guess this confirms you're from reddit.
                > Projecting now?
                What's there to project? Checking the archives is an easy task, unlike those non-existent surveys.
                >You don't lose.
                But you do. That's why you sperg out whenever someone mocks the Batman. You always take Ls and you're desperate for a W. That's why you'll keep responding.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                >SEETHING
                Oh you have trouble with social cues as well?
                You see, I was happy to know that my monkey was obeying. I wasn't furious.
                Are things clearer now?
                >You're a bit more than dull-
                No that was in reference to your insult.
                Is that another thing you don't get?
                >you wouldn't have responded with this if you did the thing!
                And you're critical of the "you reply you lose" trick?
                >What I said was clear cut-
                I know. I understood it the first time. Even replied in kind about it.
                It'll be archived forever. Anyone who wants to read you being blatantly wrong can read it.
                >unless it's reddit there's only one which confirms you're from reddit!
                Didn't you say you were against third grade argumentative tactics?
                >non-existent surveys
                You brought up surveys. I never did.
                >But you do
                Haven't yet.
                >You always take L's
                If you find truth to be a losing hand, you have no idea what winning is.
                >That's why you'll keep responding
                Again, weren't you against the "reply and you lose" tactic?
                Or is this meant to say, "you lose every time you reply" which leads back into that, or is it "you reply and always lose" which also ties back into that.
                I knew you were moronic, but for someone who prides themselves on saying the right thing, I didn't think you'd be so obviously hypocritical.
                >you sperg out!
                And it procures good results. You're the best lolcow I've had in a while.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                He looks like a drug addict cosplayer with bad teeth. I remember when the trailer came out and everyone was clowning on his teeth and stupid "angry" expression. The whole scene is just a shitty copy of the TDK scene.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                He has fine teeth.
                This movie was so good people literally have to lie to find complaints, kek.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Nah, they are pretty bad. But everyone was making fun of his unintelligible grunting. This movie is an unintentional comedy.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're not alone. From a review
                > Sure, let’s shove a joker in there in a way that basically grinds the ending to a halt and shows us why we typically have this kind of stuff post-credits scenes (even though I basically am exhausted by them). But the second the audience realized who was talking? They snickered. Yup. This Batman loving audience actually snickered. We’ve had so so so much Joker and yet, they couldn’t help but go back to the well again, could they? You could feel the air leave the room

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I've seen this before. Where is it from? I've seen multiple people say that the audience laughed at some parts of the movie. Riddler especially was so bad I couldn't believe it.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                Riddler was great man.
                Over 10,000 people agreed and so did critics.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I like BvS, but even I can admit that Lex was subpar. You're just a shill who pretends this was a perfect movie. Riddler was beyond cringe. The fans of this movie were lulled into believing it is high art because it has some pretty pictures. The writing and acting are fricking terrible. But as long as there's a hecking cool pointless Batmobile chase, it's all good to brainlets.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Filmcrithulk essay.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Thanks.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Audible groans for the Riddler where I'm from.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Almost everyone who watched the film with me thought Dano was terrible. Especially his video messages.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                i saw it opening night and some women screamed during riddler's opening scene
                women are funny

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The opening scene wasn't bad. It's when they allowed Dano to speak it went downhill.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                Damn, couldn't even find a review shitting on what he was criticizing, kek.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                Nah they're not.
                Glad we settled that.
                >Everyone was
                Nah they weren't. I never saw it.
                >unintentional comedy
                Nah it has comedy on purpose.
                So if you laughed during any scene in the film, you fed into the fact that it had comedic scenes, therefore confirming it set out to complete its mission.
                I'm glad we settled this.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Two things can be both ridiculous.
                >Besides, it's time to grow out of "Batman NEVER le kills." Snyder was right.
                lmao no. Create your Punisher wannabe if you hate Batman

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Batman
      Batfleck played a great Bruce Wayne, took the character seriously despite the scripts being no so helpful. His suits were also pretty great and the most varied while still staying true to the comics.

      >Superman

      Reeves Superman is quite possibly the best portrayal of a comic book her on film. He was a medicore actor but all his talents were perfect for both playing Kent and Superman perfectly. He did minimal steroids and its the only suit thats totally unforgiving but as a viewer you believe he is Superman despite being just a normie linebacker instead of a wacked out bodybuilder. Its just works and still does, Hollywood should take note.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Keaton and Reeve. Affleck could have been good but he was never given the right movie.

      Keaton and Reeve.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I miss that nigha Reeves like you wouldn't believe. No other Superman has even come close, Tom welling was alright but there's something lacking I can't describe

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I just realized George Reeves was in Gone with the Wind

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Bale wearing Keaton style costume
    >Cavill wearing a Reeves style costume
    >both team up in one movie to fight a supervillain, perhaps Brainiac
    Would be high kino

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hell yeah dude

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I think Cavil could have come close to rivaling Reeves if he had better writing. Man Of Steel definitely had some great moments.

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    look at those DSL's, Kilmer is GOATed with the sauce

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      zoomer homosexual go back to tiktok

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        go drink some prune juice old man

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    kreaton get two Bartmand?.

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Uh why is Superman white in all these? Fricking chuds. Why cant there be a black woman?

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Adam West

    Brandon Routh

    Come at me

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm with you on Routh. The ending of Returns with him getting stabbed genuinely shook me when I saw it originally.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Returns is underrated and Routh was good.
        >I'M STILL SUPERMAN!

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Routh was good and the movie had its moment (particularly the airplane scen which is the best Superman moment to ever leave the pages) but the movie was shit.
          Granted, I'd rewatch it on repeat over whatever followed, but....

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nice spoiler gay

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like Keaton's and Pattinson's.
    Rest are goofy muscle suits and Affleck's is duct tape.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why does it need breasts? Is a female costume?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        At least it's armor and not actual breasts.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          That's fake muscle. Pattinson suit actually have torpedo breasts.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            I don't think so man, you might just need to rub one out.
            Seems like armor meant to fit a muscular male chest.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              No. It look like two pointed breasts.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                If you see breasts there anon you've got some sexual issues you need to work out.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The problem with the fake pectorals Pattison's wearing is that it is too angular. It reminds me of those bras Madonna would wear.
                Male pectorals should look more like two squares.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Except a male chest rounds at the bottom and is majority flat at the middle, like the pieces of armor, which slope a small amount at the bottom and take up most of the space as a muscled flat surface.
                For Pattinson's armor to look like actual breasts, the woman's nipple would be the tip of a triangle with a large slope up and a tiny slope inward.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Pattison's armor genuinely look like what a female hero would wear. The fake pectorais have the shape of triangles. That's not how male pectorials are meant to look.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Except the placement of the points, i.e. the nipples, are where male nipples are. Closer to the side at the bottom than the middle in the center for breasts.
                So your drawing is incorrect to how his suit is shaped, which more closely resembles the male pectorals with an angular design to accentuate the masculine form.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Dude, his armor is very feminine looking. It feels like i am constantly seeing the underside of his female breasts. It should look blocky, but instead it looks like some torpedo breasts.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                And yet

                BvS Batman mogs all

                has the same angular slope where the nipple is, just like Pattinson's, as well as the broad chest.
                If you genuinely believe male nipples are directly in the center of the chest, like your drawing, you are five years old.
                It isn't feminine looking.
                It's how the male chest is.
                >underside of breasts
                breasts have long rectangular slopes that stretch across the chest?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Disagree, the fake pectorals from the Affleck's suit actually look like big squares, very akin to Roman suits.
                The problem with Pattison's suit is that it is too pointy. You've an angular shape, with the center pointing outwards. That's why it looks like torpedo breasts.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I guess we'll just have to disagree then.
                Torpedo breasts have nipples right in the center.
                Both Pattinson and Affleck have angular slopes downward and upward with square blocks to represent the chest, and points at the bottom right to represent the nipples.
                If the nips aren't in the center, and the slopes aren't equal in size, it's not a torpedo tit.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Torpedo breasts have nipples right in the center.
                That's the impression Pattison's suit give because right at the center you've this pointy mass. That's why it looks like torpedo breasts. I don't know why they decided to make the fake pectorals look like pyramids. Pyramids reminds me of giant breasts.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Except it isn't at the center. It's bottom right. Where male nipples are. breasts have nips dead center. Pecs don't. Basic biology.
                >pyramids
                Except they're not. You can see in the images I posted.
                The expansive chest part, the two square shaped plates, don't angle forward, but are flat.
                So it's flat plates that angle downward. Not two plates that angle upward like a pyramid.
                The point the two make on the side, with the slope plate being smaller, is the male nipple, whereas torpedo breasts would meet directly in the center head on.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The red dots circles look like female nipples on top of big torpedo breasts. You can say that they're sagging a bit, but that's it.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Well if they're sagging then they're not torpedo breasts because torpedo breasts stick straight out and don't fricking sag.
                You're just describing male pecs.
                Look, I know you want to win this.
                But biology and logic aren't on your side.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >You're just describing male pecs.
                Too pointy to be male pecs. Men don't have pointy as frick nipples. That's the issue. The pecs are too angular. It ends up looking very feminine because of it.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                And yet Afflecks suit has lines which make the points at the nipples.
                So we've got two near-squares on each, angles on each, proper nipple placement on each, and points where the nipples protrude on each.
                >B-b-but one looks like a torpedo tit!
                Sagging torpedo breasts? Yeah.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                If it was shaped like in my pic, it would have looked better and more manlier.
                The problem is that the elevation is almost in the middle of the chest, way too high, and too pointy, and that's why it looks like female breasts.

                Except they are. Cope all you want, but they both share the same shape, only Pattinson's is more geometric.
                You find breasts geometric?
                The center points outward on Affleck's too.
                >V
                Well, since they're both pyramids, they'd look V outward.
                But shape wise? Pattinson's chest isn't a V.

                You sound angry. Chill out.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why would I be angry?
                Torpedo breasts have an equal angle that leads to a nip directly in the center.
                Pattinson's nip is at the bottom, not the center.
                It isn't sagging, because torpedo breasts don't sag.
                It's just the male chest.
                Call it a male torpedo tit if you want, but it logically cannot be female.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Pattinson's nip is at the bottom, not the center.
                The problem is that the "bottom" isn't low enough, it is almost close to the center and thus looks very feminine. Check my pic. The nip line should be at the showed with the blue color, but Pattison's nip line is way up high. It is also too angular where the nip line is very pointy. Like he has a permanent hard nipple.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Same for this.
                breasts don't become angular triangles at the bottom, and female superhero costumes have rounded bottom for the breasts because breasts aren't geometric like pectorals.
                Both look manly. Neither look feminine.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                See this pic. This is why it looks like breasts. Why the bottom is so prominent? It end up looking like the underside of boobs.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Boobs don't have flat slabs under them.

                Squares are geometric, but so are pyramids and cones and bras have been made in that shape.

                And yet pyramids and cones don't have sharp edges.

                >Pattinson's nip is at the bottom, not the center.
                The problem is that the "bottom" isn't low enough, it is almost close to the center and thus looks very feminine. Check my pic. The nip line should be at the showed with the blue color, but Pattison's nip line is way up high. It is also too angular where the nip line is very pointy. Like he has a permanent hard nipple.

                Pattinson's nips are at the right level.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The nipples there are way down, not in the middle of the chest like in Pattinson's suit.

                Give up, dude. Pattison's suit have breasts.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Sorry, they're not. And if he does have breasts, so does Affleck's.
                Where do we go from here?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Post a pic of the two. I dare you.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I already did. I made two markups.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Y'know Affleck's tactical suit is shaped exactly the same right? On the chest. Same exact sloping and pointage.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Frick I meant cones don't have sharp edges.
                Pyramids do. But there aren't pyramid bras.
                Plus, Pattinson's pyramid is only on the nipple, like Affleck's.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Pattinson's nipples are way too high.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Sorry dude.
                They're on the right level, kek.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The nipples in your picture are placed lower than the pointy area of the suit. Nice try.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Nice try, but they're more aligned with the red than the blue.
                Just admit it. He doesn't have breasts.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The pointy areas of the suit are way too fricking high. Don't even try to pretend.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >N-n-now I'm gonna make the new spots blue so I win!
                Nice try.
                If we're judging by closer, and if they're not perfectly aligned then we are, I obviously win.
                Anyway, here's one clean of marking.
                Even the bodies match, kek.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're redoing the image and placing the guys nipples way too high just so it will fit the suit. KEK. What a dishonest frick.

                Dude, Pattison's suit have breasts. Just accept it and move on with your life.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Placing the nipples way too high
                If they're way too high then why do the bodies match? Why does the arm fit perfectly to Pattinson? If the nipples were off, wouldn't the arm be off too?
                Keep the cope comin'.
                Pattinson doesn't have breasts and I proved it.
                Move on with your life man. This lolcow posting is getting sad.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                It look like breasts. You know this deep down. That's why you wasted all this effort to argue instead of just dismissing outright. You know there's merit to it.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I dismissed it outright a while ago.
                I'll dismiss it again. They aren't.
                But you must know I'm right deep down.
                Or you wouldn't have kept replying.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                looks like the nips match man
                he's right about the arm i think
                Batfleck is cooler tho

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >breasts
                what boobs look like this?
                hunter Schafer breasts maybe

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Frick the arm does match well.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                bro added a line right in the midle to make it look like boobs, lol

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Squares are geometric, but so are pyramids and cones and bras have been made in that shape.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Batfleck's pecs aren't shaped like pyramids. They're shaped like human pecs, fake as they are, and they're shaped as squares most importantly.

                Pattison's pecs are shaped like pyramids. The center points outwards. Everything is too clean cut and angular for comfort. It ends up looking very "V" like and thus feminine.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Except they are. Cope all you want, but they both share the same shape, only Pattinson's is more geometric.
                You find breasts geometric?
                The center points outward on Affleck's too.
                >V
                Well, since they're both pyramids, they'd look V outward.
                But shape wise? Pattinson's chest isn't a V.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                they both have pyramids solely to the nipples, like ladies do, but it's the placement that defines men to women chests.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                If you see breasts there anon you've got some sexual issues you need to work out.

                one has more space on top while the other is equal top and bottom like perky boobs.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >gen x’ers leaked their cream into their club spandex for this hag

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                He looks like he's in a Halloween costume.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Big cope. Pattinson's was almost Gotham level bad. Affleck is by far the most comic accurate and best.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I watched the dark knight part two on HBO last night and thought it was pretty cool how the lifted the exact suit from here to BvS final fight

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's close. Heavily inspired from the comic/flick. Dare I say it Snyder is based. I really enjoyed his BvS and justice league cut after hating the frick out of the theatrical version that meme quip homosexual joss whedon desecrated

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >meme quip homosexual joss whedon desecrated

            99% of Whedon version was Snydershit's material including the cringe jokes, so cope about it homosexual.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >995

              BWA-HA-HA, You failed in math didn't you?

              -- more than 3 minutes total if awful mystache CGI scenes (kids phone, do yiu bleed, and smallville farm scenes.
              -- about 1 minute of unnecessary movie intro store, cops, homeless guy.
              -- 15 minutes of Batman roiftop scene,
              -- 7 minutes of re-shot Bruce Wayne/Alfred airplane scene
              -- 2 minutes + of re-shot Amazon fight scenes
              -- more than 5 minutes of unecessary russian family acenes.
              -- more than 1 minue of re-shot Aquaman scenes being an ahole to Bruce, then, Victor and also Barry ... plus a douche line for Diana.
              --almist 10 minutes of re-shot final fight
              -- and more scenes re-shot just for quips, bat jokes, and or boob jokes.

              all in 2-hour Whedon theatrical cut.

              And you calculte that as 99%.?

              See, how we jnow you're a moron who doesn't oay attentio and likes to pull ideas out if his ass?

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Why in the frick was the BvS snyder cut I just watched completely different than the slop whedon cut? You don't even make sense. Whedon cut out CHUNKS of the story and exposition and added in meme quips left and right. The tone of synder is atleast hallway serious, the theatrical version that whedon contaminated is a dead pool marvel flick. The doomsday sub plot just kind of happens in the whedon cut with no lead up or reason

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >snydroids still under massive delusions

                I am so glad his shitty project is dead.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Batfleck was really close to the Frank Miller/Jim Lee suit.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            I appreciated the older and more seasoned Batman well beyond the point of giving a shit about murdering or whatever homosexual younger Batman always copes with. Fricking Batman beyond WHEN

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              That's the Frank Miller version. A lot of people cope about it but Batman kills in Dark Knight Returns. Snyder based his Batman on that.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                No he doesn't. I know what panel of the panel you are talking about and that has been debunked by Miller.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, he does. He also kills in the prequel.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Isn't it stated that those are rubber bullets and concussion grenades? Also, if he does indeed kill, that automatically makes it the worst batman comic. Batman not killing is the one rule. If you want a batman that kills, go read Punisher.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                He shoots rubber bullets in subsequent pages. No mention of concussion grenades. Realistically those dudes are dead. Even the animated movie has him shooting missiles that blow up thugs.

                >You're right
                So...Affleck did look goofy?
                Glad we agree.
                >H-h-h-he looked like a water head while Affleck would only look bad in a compromised position!
                Kek you lolcows are rich.

                The cowl looks moronic. His cranium is swollen, like a waterhead indeed.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                >head looks swollen
                Nah it doesn't.
                >cowl is moron
                Nah it's cool.
                >water head indeed
                Are you a Brit?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                If that's the case it really deflates the death of the joker.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      i like Patterson's too
      reminds me of wolverine
      (guess he's a torpedo titter now)

  10. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like both Keaton suits a lot. They're my favorite.

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Best Joker

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The two Keaton suits are the best, followed by Val Kilmer's "Panther suit" which is basically an updating of the Keaton suit. The Kilmer "Sonar suit" and both Clooney suits are trash, Bale's Batman Begins suit is serviceable, the Dark Knight & Dark Knight Rises suits are shit, all the Affleck suits are shit.The Pattinson cowl and cape are good but the body is bland tacticool shit that feels like the Nolan movies.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      You, sir, are the only correct person itt.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      The Panther suit is fricking great. Yes, nipples, but ignore that and it's a perfect organic looking costume that makes him look like a creature of the night.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      The Panther suit is fricking great. Yes, nipples, but ignore that and it's a perfect organic looking costume that makes him look like a creature of the night.

      great suit

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Bats
      Keaton Batsuits are still my favorite because of the almost all-black color save for the utility belt and emblem, fitting for the "Dark Knight". My preference goes to 89 because of the natural looking pecs compared to returns flat ones, but returns also has the correct emblem, so the perfect one would be 89 suit with Returns emblem.
      As and

      The Panther suit is fricking great. Yes, nipples, but ignore that and it's a perfect organic looking costume that makes him look like a creature of the night.

      said, Kilmer's panther suit is fricking great, a kind of upgrade of the Burton suits, though I'd have kept the belt yellow.
      I thought I'd hate Affleck suit, but I ended up really liking it, despite the way too big bat imo and the tiny ears, it's a nice balance of grey and black.
      I'm not a huge fan of Bale Batsuits, they're too tactical, save for the Begins one, which is the one from the movie where Nolan's "muh realism" autism wasn't too cringeworthy, except for the awful look of the Scarecrow, since at least Gotham looks like Gotham and not NYC/Chicago.
      TAS/JL cartoon suits also make Batman look good with a black/dark blue cape and cowl.

      >Supes
      Nostalgia says Reeve for purely classic, but the fact is that Routh's suit could have been the best save for those awful dark red/maroon parts.
      Cavill suit is good despite the darker colors, but it definitely needed to have a red belt like in the New 52 comics to "separate" the suit, like with Batman's yellow belt.

  13. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Keaton and Reeve. Affleck could have been good but he was never given the right movie.

  14. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    it proves batman will always look stupid in live action regardless of how they try to make it look or with whom

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not true though.

      Look at how they lit Keaton in 89 versus the ones that came after. They did it right there. German expressionist is the style that works for him the most.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not true though.

      Look at how they lit Keaton in 89 versus the ones that came after. They did it right there. German expressionist is the style that works for him the most.

      This

  15. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Routh and Bale, no doubt.

  16. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I never understood comparing these suits in isolation. Keaton's suit as good as they're would look shit in Nolan's films and the overall aesthetic they go far. The suits are designed with the films overall aesthetic in mind. Batfleck looks great in BvS but looks dogshit in any promo pic to give another example.

  17. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    BvS Batman mogs all

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      What a fricking beast.
      How sad people have to cope by calling this fat.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Shit car, funny head. Looks like a hamster, not a bat.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        No batman looks like a bat
        Except for stan lee's

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Funny head
        Ohnononono

        • 10 months ago
          TheBatmanFan

          Remember when that guy posted that image in a thread and said Batfleck never looked goofy, and he got BTFO'd?
          I hope you're that guy.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's right, Affleck never looked that goofy. You can dig up some obscure image of Batfleck in a compromised position, but Pattinson looks like a waterhead in every shot.

            • 10 months ago
              TheBatmanFan

              >You're right
              So...Affleck did look goofy?
              Glad we agree.
              >H-h-h-he looked like a water head while Affleck would only look bad in a compromised position!
              Kek you lolcows are rich.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Suit looks like plastic incapable of being bullet proof and his bat ears are way too short

  18. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    We're back to Michael Keaton though.

  19. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Best Batman

  20. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Affleck and Cavill

  21. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Lol at autist arguing whether Pattinson's suit has breasts. It was shit either way like the rest of the movie.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because the Batman is quintessential slop. There's nothing worthwhile in discussing it. Matt Reeves is JJ Abrams with a darker aesthetic.

  22. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Batman Returns batsuit is the best in my opinion. It's similar to the first movie's batsuit, but with some good improvements.

  23. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    C.Reeves and Keaton

  24. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Good god why do Batman threads always devolve into the most autistic arguments?
    homies ITT arguing about Batman's breasts

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's pattinson fans. They are super defensive and insecure for some reason. They have to call Affleck fat or duct taped to prop up Pattinson, and have a meltdown when he is criticized.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because that what nerds do and should be doing instead of being demoralised with D.I.E. horseshit.

  25. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not fair, christian bale had 3 different suits. He was bulky as frick looking and then they really slimmed it down. Did not care for the neck area around the cowl after begins

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I honestly think The dark knight batsuits are some of the worst. I hated how the movies were so obsessed with realism. It was comical how serious and up its own as it was. Also, Heath Ledger's Joker is overrated.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I hated how the movies were so obsessed with realism
        They weren't
        > It was comical how serious and up its own as it was.
        I assume you hate BvS and The Batman as well based on this.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          You are not gonna try and say a movie with a performance like Colin Farrell's Penguin is taking itself seriously.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Colin Farrell's Penguin
            > The Batman was good.
            Of course, it's The Batman shills trying to disparage the trilogy. Jej, Your terrible attempts at aping Se7en and Zodiac made the film so uber serious that TDK feels light hearted in comparison.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              I dislike every live action joker performance.

            • 10 months ago
              TheBatmanFan

              >Waaah I think it must be good if it's old and nostalgic!!
              kek. seethers are great.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I dislike every live action joker performance.

                Remember, The Batman is considered an overly serious and comically bad attempt at aping Fincher. This is either considered mid or terrible with the exception of a handful of Gen Z morons who pretend they know comics.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >considered
                Meaning Cinemaphile hates it and everyone else loves it.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >everyone else loves it.
                Everyone else forgot about it.

                It is the most comic accurate interpretation. Accept in one department- aesthetics. Batman Returns feels like the comics.

                >Aesthetics
                > Burton
                As I said. You're a zoomie who doesn't know anything. Burton's aesthetic wasn't comic accurate. He was just doing what he does in every other film i.e ape German expressionism and give it a more gothic aesthetic. It was such a success that it future comics and cartoons like BTAS copied them. Comics became Burton accurate not the other way around.

                I can guarantee Gothic wasn't in the vocabulary of the average Batman nerd before Burton.

                >Lemurman
                Already disproven. Many bats have wings which connect at the feet.
                And, Batman knew Spanish.

                Still looks more like a lemur than a bat, kek.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                What Burton did was an Improvement. I guess you want gotham to look like Chicago.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                A film can look like Chicago, LA, New York and still be great. Heat, Se7en, Chinatown, and so many other crime flicks take place in regular cities and still give a distinct atmosphere. It's all in the hands of the director. There's a reason anyone who has seen Heat can feel it in TDK and it's not due to the plot.

                The dogmatic expectation that every filmmaker to stick to Burton aesthetics which while great is silly.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >minimum of 10,000 people forgot about this movie I'm talking about because...I don't like it!

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                It is the most comic accurate interpretation. Accept in one department- aesthetics. Batman Returns feels like the comics.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Nope. The Batman was good. Batman v. Superman was a cgi shit show. Batman is a detective above all else.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            But The Batman had Batman being a moron that can't solve any clue or save anyone.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Still more detective than any other batman movie.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                > Still more detective.
                Neither is Lemurman. A local beat cop could've solved the case in 2 days.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                >Lemurman
                Already disproven. Many bats have wings which connect at the feet.
                And, Batman knew Spanish.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                What do you have against this movie? Are you upset Ben Affleck got canned?

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                He is Affleck.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                What do you have against this movie? Are you upset Ben Affleck got canned?

                I'm not Snyder fan and while I don't care if you nerds shill your mediocre Batshit, I just want to remind you that you should keep Nolan and Burton's films out of your mouths.

                Keep your console wars to Snydershit.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                Nolan had one good movie.
                Burton had one good movie.
                Reeves will have three.
                Oh shit, I forgot to keep it out of my mouth.
                What was I supposed to not say?
                Burton and Nolan?
                Or Nolan and Burton?
                Just Burton?
                Or just Nolan?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The only way Reeves will have 2 more good batman movies is if he stears clear of the Joker. Joker fatigue has set in. Even in the comics. It's cringey how everytime the joker appear in the comics, the writer feels the need to one-up the violence of his previous appearance.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                He won't have Joker in the sequel.
                But he might be in the third.

                >Reeves will have three
                Is he going to make 4 films then? Because he doesn't even have 1 so far.

                No he has one.
                You just miscounted. Easy mistake.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >No he has one.
                >You just miscounted
                He has Zero(0). You have terrible taste. Not easy to recognize for midwits.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                >terrible taste
                Subjective
                >0
                Subjective
                >Not easy to recognize for midwits
                I know. You think you have good taste.
                See? I'm being subjective.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Subjective
                >Subjective
                Congratulations on figuring out a basic element of cinema. Film is subjective which is why most people yawn or laugh at your mediocre flick, why Cinemaphile shits on it 24/7 while a handful of you desperately try to defend it.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                Find me 10,000 people who hate it.
                Go on, kek.
                If it's so widespread, pull it up.
                >that's why Cinemaphile hates it because Cinemaphile is the whole population
                Massive seething.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Find me 10,000 people who hate it.
                Do they make surveys for this kind of thing?
                >>that's why Cinemaphile hates it because Cinemaphile is the whole population.
                Are you a pajeet? Seems like you can't comprehend basic English.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                You said everyone forgot about it.
                So if 10,000 people, minimum, loved it, and yet everyone forgot about it, then the only people left would be the people who remember it to hate it.
                i.e. the rest of the population alongside folks who never saw it.
                Are you a pajeet?
                >Do they make surveys?
                Who knows. But 10,000 people loved it. Go find your own numbers. Ya gotta beat 10,000.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >You said everyone forgot about it.
                I don't have to provide stats because they don't make stats for this. But I can look at the general discourse(which all but disappeared 1 month after release)and boxoffice performance to make a good guess 🙂

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                >General discourse
                My friends still talk about it.
                Guess people didn't forget.
                >Box office
                It made more for WB than BvS.
                Did people forget about BvS?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >My friends still talk about it.
                >Guess people didn't forget.
                Are these friends in the room with us right now?
                > It made more for WB than BvS.
                It made more profits* but that's due to budget. It had a less overall gross and much lower ticket sales. It's telling that BvS is considered a near universally reviled movie with terrible audience reception and yet was seen by more people.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                >In the room with us
                No they're at their respective homes/apartments.
                >BvS is hated but more people saw it!
                So now we're arguing amount of people who saw it?
                We were talking about the amount who hated The Batman. Now you're saying everyone hated BvS and The Batman?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >No they're at their respective homes/apartments.
                Decent world building you got there in your mind.
                > We were talking about the amount who hated The Batman.
                Read jeet, Read.
                > Film is subjective which is why most people yawn or laugh at your mediocre flick.
                It means people either hated it or were bored by it. Your film is a non-factor.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                >Decent world building in your head
                Midwits often confuse reality for fantasy. You're not alone, many have the condition.
                >film is subjective which is why most yawn or laugh
                But you're assigning an opinion you can't prove, which is subjective.
                I've got proof 10,000 people loved it. You've got words insisting they yawned, and ya back it up by insisting anonymous Cinemaphile posts are enough proof.
                See the difference? I wrote it so even midwits could get it.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Midwits often confuse reality for fantasy.
                You're so close to self-awareness, yet still coming up short. So sad.
                > But you're assigning an opinion you can't prove.
                I did. You just don't want to accept the evidence I'm showing you. The fact all you can do it bring up "me and muh friends discuss it" as a counter argument to its near disappearance from pop culture discourse is hilarious to say the least.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                So what is your favorite batman movie? If you say batman v superman, I am going to laugh at you

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Tie Between TDK and Mask of The Phantasm.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                My brotha. Mask of Phantasm is pure kino.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The only Batman film to have a great romance.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                That's true. At this point I wonder why they keep trying to shoehorn in a romance. It never works, it is usually dropped in the next movie and it takes away from batman doing batman stuff.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                >You're so close
                And yet you grow further still
                >I've provided proof
                No, you haven't. Just words. I've got 10,000 people backing me.
                >Your friends
                And 10,000 people.
                Did you forget about them?
                The 10,000 people?
                Unless you're going to argue they all forgot about it?
                Kek. Good luck.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >And yet you grow further still
                "N-no u" is that the best you could come up with? Looks like you're already at your wits end, kek.
                > I've got 10,000 people backing me.
                Oh wow, the world building becomes even more elaborate.
                >Kek. Good luck.
                Did you have an aneurysm there? Or maybe it was just your sperg nature resurfacing. Sad little creature, at least shills get paid. You do this for free 24/7.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                >No u is weak
                Like saying my friends don't exist when I say they do?
                Midwits don't know when they're being hypocritical, I don't blame you.
                >World building is more elaborate
                See

                >minimum of 10,000 people forgot about this movie I'm talking about because...I don't like it!

                >Did you have a seizure? An-
                Blah, blah not an argument.
                We done?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Like saying my friends don't exist when I say they do?
                You don't even understand what "n-no u" means do you? Pffft...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
                > Blah, blah not an argument.
                Yes, it's an insult. Meant to mock you.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                >You don't know what no u is!
                I do actually.
                It's when someone says something, and the response is merely an insult or a repeat of what they've said directed at them.
                I say
                >I have friends
                And you say
                >No you're delusional
                Pretty weak.
                >Yeah it's an insult.
                Good. Not an argument. Glad we agree.
                Why add it then?
                No one seems to be laughing at your mocking.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It's when someone says something, and the response is merely an insult or a repeat of what they've said directed at them.
                No you don't. It's when you repeat the exact same insult. I call you dumb, and then you say I'm the dumb. That's what it means. When you say I you have friends but I argue they're imaginary, what exactly am I repeating here?

                It's hilarious that something that simple needs to explain. You're a genuine cretin, kek.
                > Why add it then?
                Because you deserve to be mocked. Hope that's clear.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                >It's hilarious that something that simple-
                Except I already said that.
                I gave both definitions.
                The simple repeat, and when insults include "no u" as a lead in.
                You can't read?
                >Because you deserve to be-
                Insults fly when proof runs dry.
                It was inevitable. You were just against too much.
                Don't worry man. I'll put in a good word for you during your next argument.
                I accept your concession.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Except I already said that.
                >I gave both definitions.
                There's no "two definitions". There's only one. Why do you think "N-no u" is the phrase being used?

                In fact, Since you like proofs. Check the Cinemaphile archives and give me 1 example of it being used to denote that.

                > Insults fly when proof runs dry.
                That's a nice nursery rhyme, kek. You're being mocked as a cretin because your arguments are cretinous. You're called a homosexual because you're one.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                There's no definitions where I come from.
                >Why do you think-
                I explained why. You really can't read?
                >Check the archives!
                Quid pro quo anon. I'm still waiting for your 10,000.
                Anyway, I trust my past more than anonymous posts.
                >You're being mocked-
                Another angry rant. Oo wee you're a funny sap.
                I forgot how fun it was to milk replies from lolcows.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                *two
                Not no.
                I'm no deconstructionist. There are definitions, kek.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >There's no definitions where I come from.
                The mental asylum?
                > Quid pro quo anon. I'm still waiting for your 10,000.
                No surveys exist but you can check the archives. Unless, of course you're too dumb for that as well.
                > I forgot how fun it was to milk replies from lolcows.
                Oh definitively, you're totally enjoying this argument. Just like you enjoy arguing 24/7 trying to convince people here that the Batman isn't absolute utter crap in every thread to no avail, kek.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                >The mental-
                Already fixed the mistake. Invalid response.
                >Check the archives
                I've been on many threads like this. It's always the same folks shitting on The Batman.
                Their writing styles are unique.
                >You're totally enjoying this
                I know man. I said I was.
                >To no avail
                Believe me, I've convinced a few.
                If I had no influence, you wouldn't be oh so mad.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Already fixed the mistake. Invalid response.
                Don't care. Unless, the place you come from is reddit there's only one definition.
                > I've been on many threads like this.
                Tsk, Tsk, Lazy, Lazy. People criticize anons copying insults all the time saying "You're just going n-no u". It's not even Batman specific threads newbie.
                > I know man. I said I was.
                Oh I totally believe you, kek
                > Believe me, I've convinced a few.
                Are they in the room with us right now?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Personally I hope the reeves sequels stick to the idea of exploring Gothams dark and corrupt history. I think the court of owls would be the perfect way to end the trilogy.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >court of owls
                The more I hear about this the more moronic it sounds
                I hate the retcon shit they do to add bullshit to already established origins. Like that Gotham show to make everyone know each other since the beginning even though a lot of villains traditionally have origins after Bruce Wayne becomes batman.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah the Gotham show was bad. I do think the Court of Owls could be done well with some creative liberties. I like the idea of them having "nests" on the blocked off 13th floor of old skyscrapers. Also, I would ditch the character of Lane March and make the Talon more grounded so that they aren't ninja sleeper agents.

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                Ending the sequel with the Court's reveal and the third dealing with it would be cool.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                They don't even need to reveal it in the sequel. I would prefer they hint at its existence through owl imagery in Gothams older buildings and even Wayne manor.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Reeves will have three
                Is he going to make 4 films then? Because he doesn't even have 1 so far.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Peoople laughed at your Batman in theaters.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Zach Snyder's daughter wasn't laughing lmao

              • 10 months ago
                TheBatmanFan

                Frick.
                I wouldn't go that far.
                It's just a movie.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bale only had two suits; the two you posted.

  26. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >we will never get a good Hal Jordan movie
    It hurts so much bros.

  27. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like it because how Warhammer 40K-esq it looks.

  28. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that if you say that:
    >TDK is bad
    >The Burton movies are bad
    >Batman Forever is bad

    Then you are either a troll, an idiot, or just have bad taste. With the exception of thinking Batman Forever is bad, it's a pretty decisive movie and I understand why people don't like it.

  29. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Keaton, hands down. Look at the fricking ears, homosexuals, LOOK AT THEM.
    Fricking tiny Batfleck head nipples, frick off with that shit.

  30. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    outfit-wise? ben affleck. don't care about superman though he looks goofy in any outfit

  31. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    you motherfrickers, now I can't unsee armored breasts on pattison

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's just a lazy and unimaginative design altogether.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        the mask is kino thoughever

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          The mask isn't bad but I think they alter the nose.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I don't get this
      they genuinely don't look like breasts

  32. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's not even a contest for Superman. Christopher Reeves.

    Batman is either Bale or West.

  33. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Keaton and Reeve. It's the popular opinion but it's popular for a good reason.

    The rest of the Batmans all sucked for one reason or another but Welling, Routh, and Cavill were decent Supermans even if the writing for the latter 2 was dogshit.

  34. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    this one could've been kino but these weird hand pieces ruin the whole look
    also the wingsuit, wtf were they thinking?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah the wing suit was dumb. I would have preferred that he used his cape to glide like the Arkham games. Would have looked less awkward.

  35. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    This entire thread needs to touch grass and have sex

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I WILL NEVER TOUCH GRASS I WILL NEVER HAVE SEX. NOTHING, NOT EVEN YOUR DISPARAGING POST CAN MAKE ME. HOW DOES THAT MAKE YOU FEEL, TOUGH GUY????

  36. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    holy shit why does Zack Snyder make bitter autists go off the rails, seethe and stamp around like a woman throwing a tantrum and shit their diapers?
    Unironically take your meds

  37. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Kevin Porter is the best looking Batman and the only one who doesn't look like an autist

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous
        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Kevin Porter is the best looking Batman and the only one who doesn't look like an autist

          Cool cosplay but every live action batman looks better
          Except patterson

          • 10 months ago
            TheBatmanFan

            Nah Pattinson is about as good as Porter.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >every live action batman looks better
            No live action batman looks better

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not watching your shitty fanfilm

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              It looks like a slightly high budget cosplay. Why do comicbook gays have such shitty aesthetic sense?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Chadfleck mogs.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Clooney 2.0 mogs
        OK

  38. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Keaton followed by Bale
    Reeves followed by Routh

  39. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bale and Reeve

  40. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bale > Affleck > West

    All the Supemans are pretty gay.

  41. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    For me it's Tom Welling's. Smallville holds up amazingly good to be honest. I watched the first 2 seasons recently and they were absolute units. Made me feel like I was 14 again and Lana Lang was such a fricking hottie. So much fan service of her too, no wonder I had a crush on her,

  42. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Keaton and Reeve
    Honorable mention to the Nolan 'fit.

  43. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    HOLY SHIT FRICK OFF CARD NO ONE LOVES YOU. STOP SHILLING YOUR homosexualY CHANNEL. YOU'RE A PSEUD homosexual WHO WEARS DRESSES TO BE HIP WITH LGBT FREAKS AND PRETENDS TO BELIEVE IN GOD SO YOUR MORMON CHURCH WONT DISOWN YOU. EVERYTHING YOU DO IS FAKE AND GAY AND FOR ATTENTION AND YOU EVEN ADMIT TO THIS YOURSELF. YOUR BANAL RAMBLINGS IN FRONT OF A CHALKBOARD DON'T MAKE YOU ANYMORE AN INTELLECTUAL THAN WRITING IN METRE MAKES YOU A POET OR DESCRIBING A LITTLE GIRL PISSING HERSELF MAKES YOU AVANT GARDE. YOUR LITERARY PERSONA WAS SO MUCH OF AN ACT THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO GET VIEWERS FROM THE Cinemaphile BOARD NOW. BUT IT'S NOT LIKE YOU HAVE ANY VIEWERS, YOU LITERALLY PAYED FOR ALL YOUR SUBSCRIBERS YET YOU STILL TRY TO BOAST ABOUT BEING A 'SOMEONE'.

  44. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    what da when was ben affleck batman?

  45. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    grow up

  46. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Batfleck wins everything every bat suit he had was the best Batman suit had the best Batmobile too Keaton suit and Batmobile are overrated. Favorite Superman suit? I guess I like the black suit from the Snyder cut even if it’s unconventional idk kind of neat to see something different

  47. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Batman
    Michael Keaton.
    >Superman
    Brandon Routh.

  48. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is it weird that I legit think both suits look better from right to left?

  49. 10 months ago
    TheBatmanFan

    [...]

    You all get so mad.
    Cinemaphile has the best lolcows.
    Anyway, you got proof that everyone feels this way?
    If you do, I'll never reply here again.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not him, but I hate shameless shills and deeply insecure people who act grandiose to compensate.
      Both of these apply to you.

      • 10 months ago
        TheBatmanFan

        If you hate me, you hate who I'm arguing with too.
        I don't think he's a shill though, I'll give him that.
        But I'll shill for The Batman any day of the week.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yep, he seems like a homosexual too.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Batfleck board

      • 10 months ago
        TheBatmanFan

        I'm well aware.
        Cinemaphile has poor taste.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Lmao. no. There are maybe 3 butthurt snydertards.
        And one delusional patterson shill.
        Board belongs to people who dislike both becasue they are both shit. And it reflects the general opinion

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      > Cinemaphile has the best lolcows.
      It must take a lot of copium to think you aren't the laughing stock here.

      • 10 months ago
        TheBatmanFan

        If you wanna go that direction, I'd be one of two.
        It would take a shitload of copium to think I was the only one.

  50. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    > Oh you have trouble with social cues as well?
    Oh you're absolutely seething. Your responses getting angrier by the minute. Kek

    > No that was in reference to your insult.

    And mine was a reference to your intellect. Hope that's clear.

    > And you're critical of the "you reply you lose" trick?

    Well at least, you're admitting you did in fact try that trick. Let's be honest. You desperately want the last word and you were hoping that the third grade tactic would relieve you of that misery.
    > I know. I understood it the first time.

    You still don't seem to be understanding it, kek. No anon is on your side and everyone sees you for the dumb sperg thar you

    [...]

    > Didn't you say you were against third grade argumentative tactics?

    It's not an argument. It's a statement of fact redditor. Instead of admitting you got the definition wrong you just keep digging yourself further

    > You brought up surveys. I never did.

    So they don't exist, good on you for admitting that.

    > Haven't yet.
    Check the thread.
    > If you find truth to be a losing hand

    What truth? The only truth you need to accept is that The Batman is mediocre and people here will laugh at it.

    >Again, weren't you against the "reply and you lose" tactic?

    Yes and calling you out for your desperation isn't it. Because that's the underlying reason for your ape out.

    > You're the best lolcow I've had in a while.

    You can keep telling yourself that you aren't the subject of mockery but it won't change ground realities.

    • 10 months ago
      TheBatmanFan

      I was gonna go play by play again to prove you wrong more, but you've lost here.
      You specifically erased my number to get out of "replying to me".
      That has to be the saddest thing I've ever seen.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        You're in the thread moron. You can see the response. The number erasure is obviosly accidental. I'm sure you'll run away regardless even if I post it again with your number, kek.

        • 10 months ago
          TheBatmanFan

          Yes, the only way to signify you're speaking to me being erased after I called you out for the "reply and lose" trick is ACCIDENTAL.
          I'm not running away.
          If this thread decides we're spergs, then I will sperg out until the last star explodes.
          Give me every intentional misinterpretation, exaggeration, and ad hominem you can.
          I will always reply.
          Because you're wrong. And I can prove it.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Yes, the only way to signify you're speaking to me being erased after I called you out for the "reply and lose" trick is ACCIDENTAL.
            Here. Let me post this to you directly then. Kek

            > Oh you have trouble with social cues as well?
            Oh you're absolutely seething. Your responses getting angrier by the minute. Kek

            > No that was in reference to your insult.

            And mine was a reference to your intellect. Hope that's clear.

            > And you're critical of the "you reply you lose" trick?

            Well at least, you're admitting you did in fact try that trick. Let's be honest. You desperately want the last word and you were hoping that the third grade tactic would relieve you of that misery.
            > I know. I understood it the first time.

            You still don't seem to be understanding it, kek. No anon is on your side and everyone sees you for the dumb sperg thar you

            [...]

            #
            > Didn't you say you were against third grade argumentative tactics?

            It's not an argument. It's a statement of fact redditor. Instead of admitting you got the definition wrong you just keep digging yourself further

            > You brought up surveys. I never did.

            So they don't exist, good on you for admitting that.

            > Haven't yet.
            Check the thread.
            > If you find truth to be a losing hand

            What truth? The only truth you need to accept is that The Batman is mediocre and people here will laugh at it.

            >Again, weren't you against the "reply and you lose" tactic?

            Yes and calling you out for your desperation isn't it. Because that's the underlying reason for your ape out.

            > You're the best lolcow I've had in a while.

            You can keep telling yourself that you aren't the subject of mockery but it won't change ground realities.

            • 10 months ago
              TheBatmanFan

              >getting angrier
              I'm quite content.
              >hope it's clear
              Never said it wasn't.
              >at least you're admitting you tried it
              No, I replied to your use of the term, not in a way which stated I was "admitting" anything.
              But this is common. You intentionally misrepresent shit.
              >you want the last word
              It has nothing to do with the last word. It has everything to do with proving you wrong.
              If you said I was right in the next reply, I wouldn't reply.
              You'd have the last word. Your perception of me is infantile.
              >would relieve you
              Again, the misery comes from you thinking you're right.
              I'm not going anywhere.
              >no one is on your side
              Plenty of people in this thread like The Batman.
              Plus, that guy called you a homosexual,
              >admitting you got the definition wrong
              My hometown isn't wrong.
              >surveys don't exist
              I never said they did. You brought them up as the means of getting your proof. I never did.
              You shot yourself in the foot and are happy when I said it was stupid.
              >The Batman is mediocre
              Everyone not on here disagrees.
              >People here will laugh at it
              People here laugh at dead people. Laughing doesn't bother me. Being factually incorrect does.
              >for you to ape out
              I'm still here.
              >you can keep telling yourself you aren't the subject of mockery
              We both are.

              That's not me schizo. Proof. Just goes to show, others can see your cowardice.

              There aren't two posts so I have no way of knowing who the frick you are. There's no (you) to compare it alongside.
              I can take a screenshot and say
              >look it isn't me!
              and claim it's a gotcha.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        > number to get out of "replying to me".
        There aren't any rules preventing you from responding to posts that aren't quoting you. I'm with that anon on this. It looks like you want to give yourself an out using a non-existent technicality.

        • 10 months ago
          TheBatmanFan

          If this isn't a samegay I don't know what is.
          This is the exact same kind of intentional misunderstanding of one of my posts only he could accomplish.
          Only he would be so literal as to think I was saying it was a rule and that it had nothing to do with our conversation.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's not me schizo. Proof. Just goes to show, others can see your cowardice.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Different anon here. Imo yiu lost this argument several responses ago and I now think less of The Batman than I did previously. Hope you're happy shill 🙂

            • 10 months ago
              TheBatmanFan

              Opinions aren't factually incorrect.
              I can't do shit about whether or not you like it.
              But me losing is factually incorrect.

  51. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Smallville guy actually wore the suit?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      In the finale I think.

  52. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like that everyone in this thread is talking about Batman because the Superman suits are all the same boring shit

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      We all agree on which is the best

  53. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like the Batmobile from the Batman I never liked the super long Keaton car or the armored vehicle bale car I prefer more of a turbo charged modified regular car

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I watch Batman to se a regular car

      We all agree on which is the best

      Pic not related, obviously

  54. 10 months ago
    TheBatmanFan

    I'm trans btw

    • 10 months ago
      TheBatmanFan

      Very funny.

  55. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think I've been psyopped by the arkham games but the Arkham Knight inspired suit by Pattinson looked the best in my opinion.

  56. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Aesthetically Burton is the coolest. Realistically the Pattinson suit is the most viable. The Affleck suit is a decent middle ground on the spectrum.

Leave a Reply to TheBatmanFan Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *