My God I can't believe I just wasted 3 hours watching this
>emo DYEL Batman
>main villain is the nerd with a big dick from Girl Next Door, wearing a shitty mask made out of green garbage bags
>Police somehow couldnt infiltrate his Twitch/Discord channel even though 500 average Joes did
>batmobile is just a jacked up muscle car
>action scenes are average at best
I can't think of a single positive thing about this movie, besides that Catwoman was kinda cute, yet all Catwoman are cute. It is inferior to the Christian Bale movies in every possible ways
ur just angry the riddler is a chud like you, chud
>>emo DYEL Batman
Post body and post your Bench Press, Squat, DL and OHP numbers.
>Who asked for this?
Pretty sure redditors wanted a detective style Batman movie ala Se7en, although that said it was better than TDKR at the very least.
TDKR had an inexplicable plot but it also had fun moments. The Batman was both inexplicable and boring.
TDKR had a terrible script with terrible directing to boot. That movie is absolutely awful aside from some laughably bad moments. This movie likewise had a terrible script but at least there were some neat ideas and better directing/acting.
TDKR was ten times better than this. The movie is dumb and the stunt work is awful, but the characters had charisma, the scenes had suspense (something completely lacking in this "thriller), and there are plenty of inspired and soulful moments.
The Batman in comparison feels like the first three episodes of a Netflix show that tries to soullessly copy too hard famous movies, like Se7en and the past Nolan's movies.
TDKR is god awful I don't have any idea what you're talking about. Suspenseful moments? The only one I can think of is when Batman made the jump in the pit, and fricking hell I can't tell you a single 'inspired or soulful moment'. The Batman had a nice sort of atmosphere to it and had a fair number or suspenseful scenes. Characters in The Batman were also charismatic, Penguin, John Turturro. It was also far better paced despite being way too fricking long.
Filtered
Seething.
Dude, Nothing The Batman will ever come close to the crazy shit pulled at TDKR. They actually downed a real fricking plane. There's no Volume tech. It is all real. Some of the stunt work is fricking awful, but Nolan still knows how to build suspense and create incredible set pieces.
Character in The Batman were one dimensional and wet like a paperbag. Batman is a nothing character that just exists to look tortured and do the same look away from screen bullshit. the Penguin is a parody who's mask does 90% of the work, and John Turturo is John Turturo.
It doesn't matter how much crazy shit Nolan did if it's a shitty scene. The Batman may have done less crazy shit behind the scenes but it was far better executed which is what counts.
>The Batman may have done less crazy shit behind the scenes but it was far better executed which is what counts.
Nothing in the movie was well executed. From the script to the set pieces. Every scenes leaves you wondering what the frick you are watching.
At least the action was fricking directed in way that wasn't laugh inducing, and the script wasn't such a convoluted mess of ideas.
>and the script wasn't such a convoluted mess of ideas.
It was. The script is fricking awful. It is easily the worst thing about the movie. It is a Se7en for morons. It almost feel like a parody.
Yes I agree that the script sucks but to say it's more nonsensical than TDKR which makes absolutely no sense if you apply a modicum of logic to it is just fricking stupid.
It IS more nonsensical than TDKR, yes.
Reeves is an absolute utter pseud. He doesn't understand what made Se7en work. Better yet, hear his take on Chinatown.
>Because in Chinatown, I think the Evelyn Mulwray character [played by Faye Dunaway] is a classic femme fatale, but as you get deeper into the story, [Jack Nicholson] assumes that she is a certain kind of person and assumes certain things about her morally, assumes she might be connected with this murder. But as he gets deeper into it, he understands the larger story and starts to realize that her story’s quite tragic and that he’s completely misjudged her.
Yeah, dude the femme fatale in noir isn't what she initially appears to be. Great observation.
>Reeves is an absolute utter pseud
I’m conflicted. On one hand, I strongly dislike his tendency towards melodrama and sentimentality. But he put together the production design team, and the aesthetics is what carries The Batman.
None of its "realism" matters when it's a dogshit scene. There's a reason why it's constantly memed on Cinemaphile anon, and it's not because of some masterclass quality filmmaking.
Taking the piss m8. TDKR is one of the worst big films to ever come out. Everything about it is utter garbage? Suspense? What fricking suspense and oh yes, the oh so inspired acting of the French actress dying like it's a fricking casting show.
>terrible directing
Constant close ups with extreme shallow depth of field doesn't count as good direction either, neither are constant shots at twilight hour. The acting is good? The frick are you talking about? The only good acting in this movie was Falcone. Catwoman can't even emote beyond pouting and Pattinson's attempts to act with his "mouth" is far worse than Bale's rasp voice. In fact, the worst aspect of this movie are the performances. Reeves can't direct performances.
Let's compare. Show me a single scene in nu-Batman where the acting is better Oldman's performance here.
>JGL just responds with "no u"
>Bane's moronic voice spoiling the whole thing
Yeah nah, it's a wasted performance.
I asked you to show me a single performance that's as good as Oldman's performance there and that's not an answer.
> Bane's voice
This is the villain of The Batman.
The performance is wasted with JGL's shitty dialogue and Bane drowning out everything else with shitty sound design. There's nothing nuanced about it, and I specifically remember that scene for being so out of place with the rest of the scene due to the tonal inconsistencies. Acting like Oldman being good at his job is some revelation doesn't make the rest of the movie good, anon. Everyone knows Oldman is a good actor, do you live under a rock?
Should be
>I specifically remember that moment
>Bane drowning out everything else with shitty sound design
Bane doesn't do anything while Oldman's speaking. I can hear the scene just fine especially oldman. Maybe the issue is with your set up?
> Acting like Oldman being good at his job is some revelation doesn't make the rest of the movie good, anon.
I'm just comparing. Pound for Pound the performances in TDKR are better.
Oldman, Caine, and Freeman give good performances but everyone else's is absolutely terrible, besides Hathaway she was ok. Just compare Joseph Gordon Levitt's delivery in that scene to Oldman. Bane and Batman are so fricking bad in that movie you can barely even make out what they're saying.
Bane was the best. Everyone else was trash.
Hardy's Bane voice became so iconic it is now the default voice for the character. Hardy's Bane is so visually appealing, so interesting in the he moves and talks, that most of the marketing was based on the character.
Characters become iconic when they're the main antagonist in the sequel to one of the most critically acclaimed films of all time. Bale's Batman voice is also iconic and is seen as the definitive Batman voice by most but it's fricking terrible.
Bale's voice sucked. It sucked for three movies. Bane's voice was great. Shut the frick up, nerd.
Bane's voice was awful, it was so bad Hardy had to redub the entire film because people couldn't understand what he was saying. And Bane's voice is also widely mocked in media, it was stupid and borderline unintelligible.
Bane voice was awesome and you're a homosexual. That's final.
Bane's voice was great, it was Nolan who decided to record it live on a plane so it was almost inaudible. They released the opening scene as a sneak preview trailer in front of an MI movie, no one could understand what Bane was saying due to the terrible sound work, so then he re-dubbed it. Nolan is a top tier moron
It was only for that scene.
>it was so bad Hardy had to redub the entire film because people couldn't.
No? It was redubbed because it was inaudible in the plane scene due to environment noise.
>Mocked.
Where is it mocked? It's heavily imitated and parodied because it's memorable. Is the Matrix slo-mo or dollars trilogy score bad because parodies exist? The consensus has always been that the voice and performance was good but it was inaudible in certain scenes due to sound mixing.
Bale was good when he wasn't in costume which is the majority of the movie.
>Can't hear the voice.
Audio issues aren't an issue with performance. I could hear them just fine(and that was the case in the theaters too).
You think Hathaway's performance is okay, I can understand but if you're standards are that high then you must've absolutely loathed that nepotism hire Kravitz's performance right?
Could she do something as basic as give a completely different vibe by simply changing her posture like Hathaway does here? In fact, how often did she even change her expressions throughout the movie?
I don't mind people saying they don't TDKR. It's shlock and it's probably a bottom 3 Nolan movie but I can't for the life of me understand how people can think The Batman is better. The only thing is does better is that the extras aren't making goofy mistakes.
>>Can't hear the voice.
Not what I said moron.
>You think Hathaway's performance is okay, I can understand but if you're standards are that high then you must've absolutely loathed that nepotism hire Kravitz's performance right?
She's good in certain scenes like the one you posted but at other times she's not, I think that's mostly because she had a terrible script to work with. Kravitz sucked and Catwoman was the weakest part of the film for sure.
>Not what I said moron
>even make out what they're saying.
I'm gonna assume you couldn't hear them based on this. I didn't have that issue.
I haven't seen it but it sounds shallow and pedantic
Batman Begins is a far better movie, and it was made by that dumb moron Nolan and it was made 17 years ago.
Generally 3 hour capeshit movies will always be a miserable experience. I learned that from BvS and Endgame.
BB is actual kino. I’m mad at myself for not watching it sooner.
>Batman Begins was made 17 years ago
A millenial Batman being emo makes more sense than being a playboy.
It wasn't that bad actually. Black cat woman was the weakest part
OP here
I actually kinda liked the Penguin, the big club...and Bruce Wayne's place had a nice gothic look. Thats pretty much all. No idea why it's rated so high and there is no way anyone would rewatch this
I liked that that too. It hindsight it was weird that they had elements like that which were kinda of outdated due to being truthful to the comics and then you have blackwoman and Cinemaphile riddler. I also came in expecting sparkly twink to suck as batman but he was better than I expected.
frick off moron if batman werent emo, people like you would still complain like saying they copying marvel or something
>the new thor movie is flopping
>uhhh the batman is le bad?
Subtle as always mickey mouse
What is this bullshit about Bane sucking? Everyone loved Bane. His lines are quoted by normies to this day. The Batman even stole his lines for the opening monologue.
>Everyone loved Bane.
I swear Baneposting has unironically rotted people's brains into thinking this. There's a reason why it was even memed in the first place.
>normies
Way to out yourself as a newbie.
>There's a reason why it was even memed in the first place.
Baneposting is about how awkward the airplane scene is, it has nothing to do about the character sucking. The character was really entertaining.
Then you're obviously a newbie. The character was openly mocked for being a piss-poor depiction of the character who was pathetically killed by Catwoman paired with a Marvel quip, and that was after being made irrelevant by the plot twist with Marion Cotillard. His only saving grace was Hardy's memetic voice, and that has more to do with the bizarre dissonance it created not because he was actually a well-written character.
Dude, shut up. I've been here for ages. Browsing this place isn't a fricking badge. I was here when the movie came out. The opening montage with the plane was awkward as frick and that's what everyone made fun of, but Bane was great in the movie. He looks different and cool, his voice worked, and he was full of memorable lines. Everyone wanted a jacket like his. His mask is recognizable.
I don't even know what you're trying to do here. If your big defense of TBM is that Bane sucked, then you're not only wrong but also a homosexual because the Riddler on top of being a poor choice of trying copy Bane fricking blew.
>Dude, shut up.
Kek. Why do you sound like an insecure homosexual just because I'm criticizing your favorite comic book villain? Bane in the movie was rightfully mocked here on Cinemaphile for having moronic plan after moronic plan (the plane scene, the stock exchange "heist", giving a random citizen the detonator?). Like I said, his only saving grace was Hardy's voice/performance, otherwise he was constantly made fun of.
The Batman isn't even that amazing of a Batman film (it's only really comparable to Begins which isn't saying much) but to act like TDKR was anything amazing is pure fricking delusion.
I am telling you to shut up because your opinion is worthless.
It's capeshit. It's batman year 2 if I recall correctly, big deal.
It's a bit dumb but aesthetically pleasing, is it worth a watch? Not really.
I'm more puzzled by why Nolangays get so uppity about the movie, peddling some sort of moronic rivalry between the TDK trilogy and the new one, putting aside the fact that it they're comparing an entire trilogy of movies.
Nolan fans don't care about the new movie. The ones that keep bringing Nolan's movies every chance they got are Pattinson's fangirls, more so because Reeves unironically said that The Batman was going to dethrone TDK in the box office,
It's more gritty and realistic than any Batman that has come before. They're not afraid to take a risk on the Batman coming across as amateurish and imperfect. Makes for the perfect kino when you never know if the next stunt will be his last
>Makes for the perfect kino when you never know if the next stunt will be his last
It is is difficult to take that shit seriously when the movie is constantly threatening to "kill" Batman for cheap suspense before showing he's perfectly fine, because otherwise the movie would lack any semblance of suspense. Hackerish.
One of the worst scene ever in this movie is when the Riddler meets... someone, in jail
>a friend!
>haha! We're friends!
>friends!!! Hihi! Hoho! We're friends!"
Or something like that. That was the most pathetic setup for a part 2 I have ever seen in any movie
>all this revisionist history for TDKR
Lest we forget. Also Bane being thrown to the wayside after a poorly choreographed final battle is some of the worst things Nolan ever filmed.
?t=19
?t=86
>>main villain is the nerd with a big dick from Girl Next Door
classic paul dano
I was enjoying this movie very much until the scene of webm related. It is sad because it had a lot of potential, but the lenny cravitz girl ruined everything. Women ruined everything. They ruined my group of friends and now they ruined batman.
So I'm expected to believe there's a new anon every fricking day who watches this film for the first time, hates it, Makes a thread and makes the same exact points?
Get a fricking life you loser c**t
>there's a new anon every fricking da
>Get a fricking life you loser c**t
if you are here every day, YOU are the fricking loser
>So I'm expected to believe there's a new anon every fricking day who watches this film for the first time, hates it, Makes a thread and makes the same exact points?
Noticed this as well in the last week or so and they always add a "who asked for this?" in the OP like it's their first time watching it. Only thing I can't tell if it's a shitpost or if they're an unironic schizo that really hates the movie.
>take comic book
>Make movie as little comic book like as possible
>Normies eat it up
This and Nolan trilogy are for homosexual moron normie c**ts. Burton is king
This. Keaton and the Burton films are the only good Batman movies.
>Burton tards.
Jesus frick, stop embarrassing yourselves. Burton was a one trick pony who got exposed as a hack. His Batman is poorly written shlock saved by art direction.
>normies
The entire genre is for normies moron.
>Stop liking what I don't like!
>DYEL
Post body please
At least gotham looked a little sylized unlike the nolan garbage where it just looks like a regular city. The music is fricking lame though, the theme is globohomosexual soulless minimalism and I actually laughed out loud when nirvana came on
The Batman gets exponentially worse as it goes on, starts off semi-interesting and ends up ludicrously terrible
It looks stylised in Batman Begins.
Only in Begins, which was amazing with the sets. It's honestly why I still go back to that movie.
Honestly been a while, I'll go back and check it out.
It's because Begins' Gotham was mostly set in "The Narrows", basically where all the poor people lived. The sequels basically establish that the main city of Gotham just looks like Chicago by comparison.
>At least gotham looked a little sylized unlike the nolan garbage where it just looks like a regular city.
This. I don't care what anyone says, but Gotham hasn't looked as good in years.
This is so pathetic compared to
That's just the Darth Vader score.
Both the Vader score and The Batman score are a variation of the funeral march
. The only difference is Williams is far more talented than Giacchino and so he did something memorable with it. Seriously there's like only 2 to 4 minutes of memorable of music in the entire movie. Not at all comparable to Elfman's score or even Zimmer's score.
>or even Zimmer's score.
Bane score was pure fr.
The only reason I even bothered to see Begins is because this track was used in so many motivational videos.
To be fair, the Keaton Batman theme is fricking iconic (not unlike Reeves Superman). So much so that the animated series basically just used it as its theme song.
The reason Gotham is mostly shot during the daylight and the city looks like any modern one in TDK is because the mobsters were all afraid of Batman. The corruption plaguing the city was wining down and there wasn't any more crime for Batman to burst during night-time. Things seemed to be getting better. That's what the movie is trying to show us.
You can see that the moment the Joker start to terrorize the city the movie start to be mostly be during night-time again and you start to see the city becoming chaotic.
Filtered
Why did cat woman wear the shitty ski mask?
all those words to tell everyone what a stupid homosexual you are
OP was filtered hard. Sad!
DC fans who only care about Batman
filt´d