Who was in the wrong here?

Who was in the wrong here?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    after the Mike Postle cheating accusation shit, I am very suspicious of these live streamed rooms. It's just a set up to create a fixed environment

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      its like not possible to cheat here, she just kept going all in on a shit hand and got lucky.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        well it's very likely Mike Postle was cheating in a similar type room. (livestreamed, RFID chips)
        I guess the only difference is players were allowed their phones in that room

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          right but her play here is like being wreckless with an all in + nothing hand and him getting unlucky

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        She called all in, very different from going all in.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          ok

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >its like not possible
        >like
        have a nice day

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          have sex

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    > "Noooo, you can't call my bluff with a jack high that makes no sense"

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      His bluff was with all kinds of great draws and outs. He raise/call all-in was with very little.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >shaves eyebrows off so no one is able to call your bluff
    man's a poker genius

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      hah
      keen eye

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't that the same guy who literally got voted out 2nd on Tony's season?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, it is.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Calling that all in is completely fricking moronic and should be done precisely 0% of the time. She didn't deserve to win but hey that's poker.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    a woman goes in displaying breasts like that all the men should take off their shirts

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      homosexual

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah they should show us all their wiener and balls too to stick it to women

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        maybe even give us a little butthole wink too, to really show those women whose boss

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        or walk up and grab their breasts. let them know you see their bullshit. no unfair advantages here, witches.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Having a good weekend over there, incel?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >haha u no do sex
            You have to be 18 to post here

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ackshually all women who come in should have their breasts buzzsawed off

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      or start crying so they lactate

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      that would be funny

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Or just take turns raping her

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        There’s also nothing worse than getting the neck of your shirt stretched out from her struggling while being raped. So take the shirts off as well.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      this is why being an ass man > being a titty boy

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        gay white male privilege is an epidemic

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What happened? Steve Albini commented on it on Twitter, but I don't understand what happened.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      she went all-in with a shit hand that statistically had a high chance of losing, even if her opponent was bluffing.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >she went all-in with a shit hand that statistically had a high chance of losing, even if her opponent was bluffing.
        Calling with a shit hand, for some reason there's NOTHING that makes these professional poker players seethe harder than this. They absolutely hate it, whether they win the hand or not.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >opponent is a pro operating along some guidelines that work with the assumption their opponent is also a pro also operating within those guidelines
          >be a completely unpredictable moron
          they hate this one weird trick

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It's called never bluff a monkey.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        can someone explain why she refunded him?

        What happened? Steve Albini commented on it on Twitter, but I don't understand what happened.

        Is this the one where she cheated by having an accomplice send her signals using a vibrating butt plug?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          no that was in chess

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      based roast beef king

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >beat 800 other players
        >only win 196k

        kek

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That's like 1 million in my third world country monopoly money, enough for you to never work a day in your life again if you are smart with it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            you kinda need to grow up in a country like that to live like a king. you need to know the way of life there.

            probably best to get a visa to america, work for a few years then move back

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >probably best to get a visa to america
              Oh, living in the United States would be a dream come true for me, except I'd never move back here unless my stay in America was VERY shitty. It's the greatest civilization on Earth right now.

      • 1 year ago
        single white female

        what a shit pot

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why the frick are you following a pedophile on twitter?

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    can someone explain why she refunded him?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      because he was throwing a fit like a fricking baby
      sorry she didn't play by the weird ass unwritten rules

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      He threw a tantrum, she just wanted to play.
      To keep the peace, she gave the baby his candy back.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >refunded him
      oh frick that shit

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how is it possible to cheat? I don't understand the controversy outside of it being a dumb move that worked out for her in the end.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Her explanation is bizarre though she assumed he had Ace high and still called with only Jack high and not even a kicker on the board?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >she assumed he had Ace high
        I thought she said she thought he didn't have anything. High card is nothing, but it is when you think it beats your nothing lol. But is there any plausible explanation on how she could cheat? Even knowing his hand, he was still likely to catch the flush and he had an open ended straight. It was still a suicidal call to make knowing his hand.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        she went all-in with a shit hand that statistically had a high chance of losing, even if her opponent was bluffing.

        can someone explain why she refunded him?

        Calling that all in is completely fricking moronic and should be done precisely 0% of the time. She didn't deserve to win but hey that's poker.

        You guys are moronic.
        Poker is about bluffing.
        In fact, even if you lose the bluff, it is still a good move Becuase it makes them uncertain about future bluffs.
        I really fricking hate you people so god dam much and what you have turned “poker” into.
        Poker is and has never been purely a stats game.
        You are fricking moronic and have ruined a fun social game.
        I can’t stress how much you gays have ruined the game.
        I blame Texas Holden actully.
        It’s not a real poker game, it’s a casino game posing as a poker game.
        It’s not how poker should be played at all
        Please shut the frick up

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          she wasn't bluffing. she called his bluff with a hand that is shit

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            How did she got there with that shit hand? She should've folded but she was bluffing

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              that is fine until you call for over $100,000 with jack high

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You are dumb

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >It’s not a real poker game, it’s a casino game posing as a poker game.
          this is the dumbest shit I've read all day, well done anon

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Autistic af
          >Bluff all the time when playing poker with friends
          >They all hate me cus they cant read me.

          It's ez, just be autist and they won't know when to cave.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            there was a pretty good episode of 30 Rock like that

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Just finished watching that for the first time since it aired on TV. God tier show.

              But yeah pretty much that, don't know enough to know when you should fold, know enough to get inside everyone elses heads.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm a raging misogynist but 30 Rock is pretty kino. Kudos to that feminist twat Tina Fey
                >That was pretty good... for a girl.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                She seems like an old school feminist that pokes fun at the moronic points of nu wave feminism.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                She seems like a feminist who could take a joke, which is a rarity.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >It’s not a real poker game, it’s a casino game posing as a poker game.
          this is the dumbest shit I've read all day, well done anon

          He’s got a point. Poker night used to be dealers pick of 7 card no peek, baseball, 5 card draw, ect, now when you say poker everyone assumes you mean Texas Holdem all night.

      • 1 year ago
        single white female

        women are stupid and she got lucky

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >got lucky
          Yeah, you have to take risks in poker, fricking moron

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >got lucky
          >why do they call it “gambling”???

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >noooooo you can't make illogical hands that go against my maths

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't play poker. How much of poker is actual chance? Are the best players just lucky or is most of the game just a run of statistics with a bit of luck?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This version, Texas hold'em, is mostly skill based. There is obviously a large amount of chance involved in what cards you're dealt and which ones come after, but the old saying "know when to hold em and know when to fold em" is true and explains that smart card players come out on top most of the time.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There's chance with the last card but mostly poker is about playing your opponent

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Its 100% chance and casinos hire actors to play "pro players" for marketing.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      99% chance, 0.5% math (i.e knowing odds and calculating effective payouts), 0 5% "skills".

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Right, that's why the best players all carry four leaf clovers and rabbit's feet when they play you absolute fool

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          my gods are smiling at me imperial, can you say the same?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          obviously they do, they just dont wear them openly because then they wouldnt be lucky. go be an ignoramus somewhere else lucklet.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      the skill plateaus after 2-3 years of intensive play, after that it's a lottery with additional steps. the regulars live of the newcomers or degens who want to burn their money down, there's little of regular on regular violence. with pros it's mostly promotional deals, coaching, and stuff like backstage agreements, when people share a cut of the winnings to minimize the variance.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Texas holdem has essentially been ‘solved’ in regards to what to do in any given situation to maximize outcome so it became a game of skill but at the top level it’s become a game of luck again basically. If you were to play a top player, you would get fleeced though.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No I wouldn't. I'd choose random plays. That's literally what "pros" admit is the best when playing other pros, and is literally what Pluribus (poker AI) does to humiliate "pros".

        It's almost like it's a game of luck. Seethe harder you fricking brainlet.

        You want to play a game based on REAL statistical variance for REAL money? Get your bread up and learning options trading.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          good luck with that strategy

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How did she cheat?

    Seems like she just made a stupid play but got lucky.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >How did she cheat?
      Probably had someone watching the live stream who then communicated to her that she had the best hand. Some speculation that one of the rings on her hand received the signal. She’s seen fidgeting with it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Are we sure it isn't a vibrating dildo?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >she had the best hand
        she didn't have the best hand though, see

        >she assumed he had Ace high
        I thought she said she thought he didn't have anything. High card is nothing, but it is when you think it beats your nothing lol. But is there any plausible explanation on how she could cheat? Even knowing his hand, he was still likely to catch the flush and he had an open ended straight. It was still a suicidal call to make knowing his hand.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That makes no sense. Her hand was absolute shit. His hand had a bunch of outs via the river, the best she could hope for was a pair.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Something statistically unlikely happened in poker
          First time seeing poker being played or what?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I responding to the person saying that she had someone feeding her info and telling her she had the better hand. She went all in way before inside info would be helpful, so it was just an entirely luck based bluff. Her hand pre-flop was awful.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              It wasn't a bluff, she CALLED all in. She was calling his bluff. The issue is that even if she knew 100% that he was bluffing, the odds were still against her because of how awful her hand was. Either she's extraordinarily moronic, or was cheating.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                except there are some bad dudes who get off on bluffing with the worst hands like 7 high or 8 high
                so its not a pure stats play its also a play on thinking he's just bluffing on a very shitty hand

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's perfectly fine to assume that he's bluffing, and call his bluff. The issue was that he was statistically more likely to be bluffing with a hand that could beat hers than he was with a hand that would lose to hers. Like I said, even if she was 100% sure that he was bluffing, calling would be a mistake.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ok fine, isn't this evidence against cheating? Like if she was cheating and knew her cards and knew his too, she would be signalled to fold. She would also have to somehow also know which cards would be dealt (and they ran it twice so she would have to know all that ahead of time too)

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, I'm not really sure what happened. Either she somehow knew what the next two cards were, or she was just tremendously moronic and lucky.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yes i guess i'm just in the moronic and lucky camp and frick garrett he plays like every hand and preys on people making dumb decisions

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You are the only moron here.
                You continuously fail to ask why he went all in on a hand that could be beat with such a shitty hand

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Because he was bluffing. The whole idea of a bluff is that they don't call it. If they call it you lose.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                it doesn't matter what he had, because she shouldn't have know what he had. in the end she called $100,000 with jack high

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                And what did he bet 100,00 with less than jack high?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Because he was bluffing.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                A straight flush draw. It's a semi-bluff, meaning even in the event he gets called he still has good equity.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                because he was bluffing and she called with a hand that loses to nearly everything

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I don’t think you know what bluffing means

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                She called his bluff with a bluff. It was a double bluff, but his hand had outs hers didn't.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >She called his bluff with a bluff
                You cannot call all in with a bluff. The entire concept of a bluff is trying to trick your opponent into folding. There was no opportunity for him to fold, so there was no bluff.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                correct

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Your right, but how else do you describe going all in on a hand you know is going to lose? She even says in the video I have a shit hand.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                There are Bluetooth actuators you can put in your shoe, or a vibrating egg up her vegana or anus, which could be triggered using an app from an accomplices phone within view of the other players hands.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I haven't watched the clip since it dropped, but if I recall correctly they both went all in before the river. At that point her hand was the losing hand. Why would her accomplice tell her to go all in?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                not him, but they wouldn't, which is why I don't think she was cheating. Just moronic.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Women fidget with their rings all the time virgin

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't bluffing part of poker too?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it would be a normal bluff if she was the one betting first, but she called his bet with a J high. That's not a bluff that's stupidity.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So wasn't the guy stupid who didn't fold with an 8 high?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          no because he had a very high chance that any one card would make his hand really good while she had basically no chance that any cards would help her there. He got massively unlucky and she got massively lucky, basically.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You know what they say about luck. Its a skill.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Poker is all about taking chances and trusting your gut.

              Lol. Are you guys in here fricking moronic or something?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                where do you think we are?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, but she wasn't bluffing. She did the equivalent of "wall hacking".

        >it doesn't count as bluffing because the hand is unlikely to win
        Doesn't that make it exactly the right time to bluff?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It doesn't count as bluffing because there was no opportunity for him to fold. The idea of a bluff is to trick your opponent into folding.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            it isn't a bluff because she called the all in forcing the pot to go to whoever had the best hand. when you are bluffing you are assuming you do not have the best hand and you want them to fold.

            It's not bluffing because she did a minimum raise firstly, and then called an all-in afterwards. If there's no more action left, calling can't possibly be a bluff.

            >The idea of a bluff is to trick your opponent into folding
            Isn't the idea to win? (Which she did)

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              still doesn't make it a bluff

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Yes, but don't call what she did a bluff.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              No, the idea of a bluff is to trick your opponent into folding. This allows you to win. Just because the idea of a bluff is to win doesn't mean that the idea of winning = bluff. I get the money if I knock the other players to the ground and shoot them multiple times in the head, but that doesn't make it a bluff.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Sounds like a lot of cope. She is a moron who did a moronic thing and he was more moronic for actually believing it. It's a bluff.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          it isn't a bluff because she called the all in forcing the pot to go to whoever had the best hand. when you are bluffing you are assuming you do not have the best hand and you want them to fold.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's not bluffing because she did a minimum raise firstly, and then called an all-in afterwards. If there's no more action left, calling can't possibly be a bluff.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, but she wasn't bluffing. She did the equivalent of "wall hacking".

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >thot makes dumb play
    >in other words takes a gamble
    >in gambling
    WWOOOWW CHEATURRRRRR

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    any video?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yeah, there is

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yeah, there is

      I found a video, this is clearly cheating

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        how so
        shes bluffing and he fell for it like a dumb frick

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          she wasn't the one bluffing

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            By continuing calling/betting, she is bluffing that she has a decent hand that can compete.

            Him continuing to call her bluff like a fool,thinking she will back down, is his own stupidity and there is no cheating likely occuring.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    She was either cheating or she’s a massive fricking poker-tard who doesn’t understand how the game works

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Poker is all about taking chances and trusting your gut.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        there's a difference between taking chances and playing Russian roulette with 5 bullets in the gun. And this was even stupider than that.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Did she win the hand or not?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >chess is about closing your eyes and trusting your gut

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Pretending that Poker is the same thing as Chess is moron-tier.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                damn that's really what you got out of my post huh

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              sometimes you just gotta flip the entire board in a rage and hope that everything falls into place perfectly and it's a checkmate

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          lmfao you're the moron who fell for it, why are you so mad? Has it happened to you?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Game of chance
          >Hate chance
          morons like you ruin things far more than women

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >NOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T BET IN THIS RANDOM CHANCE GAME YOU MUST ADHERE TO MATHEMATICALLY CORRECT PLAYS

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Curious, why is everyone massively SIMPing here? Even if she's right, she's a woman, and therefore wrong.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    She didn't cheat tho. She bet on a real shit hand and still won

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >"other guy goes all in? he must have a good hand just give up"
    So this is what pokercels call skill? Being cowards?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Her hand loses to most of the bad hands he could be bluffing with

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        But she didnt. All the pokercels reeeeeeee because a dumb thot has more balls than them.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          really obvious you have no idea what you're talking about

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Poker is so lame

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it has it's moments

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >ALL IN 1.791.000
        >2%
        Kino.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >table shakes after the river
        kino

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >King_Crimson.webm

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >pokerstars irl

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Kek Garrett the Redditor seething, he’s always off his breasts on sometbint grinding his teeth constantly moving

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Gus for not going all in

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    bimbo did nothing wrong

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    can someone understand why this is a noteable/surprising poker move?

    are they even playing poker? or is this blackjack?

    i dont understand

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >doesnt even know what blackjack is
      jesus my man

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      she called his $100,000 bluff with a really shit hand

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        And what was the outcome? lol some people here are fricking cringe karen tier

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          People below 80IQ should be removed from this website
          A fricking child could understand his logic better than you you fricking moron

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Why did he bet 100K with a shit hand

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          he is bluffing, but she should have never called with that hand unless she is A) moronic or B) cheating

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            She was bluffing too

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >you can bluff while calling an all in
              Why the frick do you even enter a thread like this if you have no idea about poker

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                it is fine to bluff with shit hands, because you are hoping to scare them to not call. calling with shit hands is moronic, because then you have to have a stronger hand which is unlikely.

                Looks like he lost tho which makes sense since it's literally random

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >never call with that hand
            Why? She won. Reality proves you wrong, but you are so stuck in the mud you can’t even see it

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              you can make moronic plays and still win in poker. it is just the nature of the game.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It’s not moronic if it worked.
                As stated above, it’s actually better to do that sometimes, even if you lose the bluff, because you can’t be know as the person that never bluffs, Becuase then you are readable.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >It’s not moronic if it worked.
                Holy fricking shit how dumb are you? How do you even have the cognitive capabilities to type out your posts?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you do that when your hand has some value not with jack high for $100,000. it is such a moronic play that people are considering that she cheated, because literally no one who has any idea of how to play the game would call that unless they knew what the the person had.

                It is not moronic if it works. The law of averages does not apply to the extremes. Imagine coping and seething about something being a dumb move 98% of the time but then also getting mad about the 2% where it works. Unlikely doesn't mean impossible, you understand that right?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You are moronic. Imagine a game where the objective is to guess what number a six sided die will land on. You're given the choice of the winning numbers being 1 and 2, or the winning number being 5. It's objectively true that either 1 or 2 are more likely to be rolled than just 5. Even if the die lands on 5 it doesn't mean that 5 is more likely to be rolled than 2 other numbers. So it's still the wrong choice.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Choosing just 5 over 1&2 is not objectively wrong. If you are playing against someone who expects you to pick 1&2 because it is the "better" play on paper, that makes choosing 5 more advantageous.

                Everything wrong with modern poker stems from the fact that players like to pretend they are up against a computer rather than a human being, then throw a tantrum when the indomitable human spirit throws a wrench in their carefully calculated probabilities. Eat the bugs you soulless worm.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you do that when your hand has some value not with jack high for $100,000. it is such a moronic play that people are considering that she cheated, because literally no one who has any idea of how to play the game would call that unless they knew what the the person had.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I would play that because im not a fricking stats nerd and im not playing with real money moron. Make him and all the other nerds seethe.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                godspeed with your future poker career

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            So why is it such a smart move to go all-in with what he had?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              it is fine to bluff with shit hands, because you are hoping to scare them to not call. calling with shit hands is moronic, because then you have to have a stronger hand which is unlikely.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >because you are hoping to scare them to not call
                What an absolutely moronic unwritten rule which pros don't follow either.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ok sammy

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Who's sammy, schizo?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                it is not an unwritten rule it is just basic fricking poker strategy

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Get fricked then. Looks like it's not a perfect one, guess what? It's poker.
                >Oh no, you defeated my moron strategy, you must've cheated
                Stay mad.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                for your own financial security please never play poker

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Stay seething and keep losing. moron. It's not like you've ever played poker in real life. Keep playing with fake money on pokerstars with your infallible strategies.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                fuming

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I accept your concession.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Um yes, it’s called buying the pot, child.
                What do you think a bluff is?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What do you think calling a bluff is, moron? I also didn't post a soijak, schizo.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >calling the bluff
                You stupid fricking Black person. She had a fricking jack high. Not even a pair, a single fricking jack. If you're going to call the bluff you should at least have a card that could beat whatever he was bluffing with. The chances that a jack high could beat whatever he was bluffing with were minuscule. There's nothing wrong with calling his bluff, the issue was that she called it when she had a horrible hand that couldn't have even beaten him had he been bluffing.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                TL;DR
                have a nice day.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Lmao, homosexual. I'll simplify it for you. There were 150 ways for her to lose and 6 for her to win. Even if she knew he was bluffing the odds were against her.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                He still lost, doesn't mean shit now, huh?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                How are you able to solve the captcha?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                except she did beat him with that hand

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Because she got extremely lucky.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >poker fans stunned and upset after local gambler wins by being extremely lucky

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                She made the objectively wrong play and won. People are understandably upset.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >you have a moral obligation to play safe or else we all will be mad
                You let a literal moron into the game, and you're surprised she's making absurd calls? That fault is on you, adjust your play style.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                For the thousand time sometimes you need to play randomly to throw people off.
                It’s not a game of stats, it’s a social game.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                There were 6 situations where her "playing randomly" would have let her win, and 150 where she would have lost. You shouldn't always play based on statistics, but you shouldn't play with unfavorable odds that big.

                >People are understandably upset.
                It wasn't the wrong play if it won.

                Just because it worked doesn't mean that it was the best idea.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Just because it worked doesn't mean that it was the best idea.
                It actually does. That's literally, exactly what it means.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Being results-oriented in a game where chance plays a significant role
                ngmi

                Are you implying that her handlers knew the exact cards that were going to come out for the river, even the last card of the river that redrawn?

                that's one of the hypotheses, using an rfid hack and some kind of vibrating device to signal when to call.

                She did nothing wrong. You call some bluffs and you leave some bluffs alone. It's literally how you play poker. Dumbasses with view of both hands are going durrr what if he had flush or straight, exceot neither could see each other's hands so both are just trying to bullshit the other one, for all he knew she could have had a higher straight or flush.

                >You call some bluffs and you leave some bluffs alone
                You don't call a bluff with Jack-high unless you like to light your money on fire. Even with his worst bluff he's still the favorite to win.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                a vibrating device you say?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                hahahaha you're so mad

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                She refunded him and will probably never show her face on a poker stream again, why would I be mad?

                If you actually understand this picture and know whats going on, please get a fricking hobby, im begging you

                wheredoyouthinkyouare.png

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >People are understandably upset.
                It wasn't the wrong play if it won.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                this, poker gays who don't bet it all on luck are plebs

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That is why no one will remember your name.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            if she was cheating, she wouldn't have called
            if she knew the contents of his hand, she would have folded

            she made a bad play and won, because luck is a factor in the game. no reasonable person would think she cheated.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Obviously if she knew his exact hole cards then she would have folded (unless she's literally moronic) but people are arguing that she has a device which basically tells her if she's ahead in the hand as it stands, or not and nothing more.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                except before the river, she was not winning the hand
                after the flop, it was 70% for garret and 30% for robbi (she called)
                after the turn, it was 53% for garret and 47% for robbi (she called all in)
                if all she knew was the percentages, she would have folded instead of calling after the flop and especially after the all in

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm saying she just knew that her hand was beating his hand, not the EV percentages.

                So basically she knew that his current hand had nothing better than her hand which was jack high. This isn't taking into account his potential to improve the hand on the river. It's just his hand as it stands.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The only explanation is she misread her hand and thought she had a 3.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          he missed the straight and the flush and figured he might as well take a shot at it if she has a shit hand

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        “$100,000 bluff”
        That used to be called “buying the pot”.
        But at the amounts these people play at its not really that much money. They might be done $500,000 one week and up 750,000 the next. It’s not real money to them.
        Which is also why the can play so erratically, and make stupid gambles.
        Which is why poker is so much better with real people and using their own real money

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    kino

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Literally the worst hand in Texas Hold'em poker, what?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        beats 6-2 5-2 4-2 3-2, you clearly don't know what you're talking about

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          no, those hands are objectively better because they can get a flush
          2-7 cannot - it is the weakest hand in the game

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          no, those hands are objectively better because they can get a flush
          2-7 cannot - it is the weakest hand in the game

          You mean make a straight, not a flush.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            correct, my mistake
            those hands are capable of a straight, but 2-7 is not

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You ever piss off a bunch of poker players by not observing the unwritten rules cause I have. It was pretty funny.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The best is walking away after you make a big win, instead of staying at the table to lose it.
      They fricking hate that.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Pissing off blackjack players is funnier, because they think it's only about them
      All old farts pretending that they can count cards.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Seethe more homosexual. Blackjack is based and counting cards is fun.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    vibrating butt plug sounds more plausible than going all in on jack high

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    if it hasn't been brought up yet here's the video
    https://streamable.com/8liwa6

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    if you guys think garrett shouldn't have gone all in with 8 high and get very upset to lose, you don't know anything about poker

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >gets out bluffed
    >screams cheater

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >calling all in
      >bluffing
      Anon, you're embarrassing yourself. It's ok to admit you don't know how poker works, just please don't pretend like you do.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I read somewhere that she said she misread her four. What the actually frick. Ban women from the table.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      She was clearly lying there since she checked her hand 3 times before calling. She also said her hand before flipping it over.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    He's literally me

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Fricking someone's shit up with a shit hand is the best feeling in the world. I say this playing for little money. If I was playing hundred and thousands of dollars I would cum in my pants.

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >poker night with family while on holiday
    >get sister to play as well
    >insists on calling all bluffs despite having frick all

    It's simply because the woman in the OP is shit at the game, every single new player does this, they don't think about the three cards, the straight, the flush you might have, they just think "he doesn't have what he says he has", which makes them think calling = they win the hand

    You have to play somewhat honestly against morons, because they simply don't have the brain power required to figure out what you need them to figure out for a good bluff to work
    So basically the guy on the OP was in the wrong, he knew he was playing a moron and tried to play smart

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >So basically the guy on the OP was in the wrong, he knew he was playing a moron and tried to play smart
      This anon gets it. His bluff would have worked fine against a halfway decent poker player. He just forgot that he was playing against a moron.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'm also going with this

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'm also going with this

      >So basically the guy on the OP was in the wrong, he knew he was playing a moron and tried to play smart
      This anon gets it. His bluff would have worked fine against a halfway decent poker player. He just forgot that he was playing against a moron.

      I'm a decent enough player to beat almost any of my friends who know how to play. But I have one friend who's a smart guy but just doesn't really know how to play poker. He constantly does the "wrong" thing and he always beats me because he's playing the game on a different level like this where stuff like bluffing just goes over his head.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    israelites and bimbos
    all of them are fricking degenerates

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >poker "professional" plays against a moron (woman)
    >tries to bluff against her based on statistics
    >get assmad when the femoid ignores all statistics and plays with her guy

    The fault unequivocally lies with the male. His plan was ill-suited for the opponent. He cannot get mad at the b***h for his own strategic error.

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This boils down to the bimbo lucking her way into a winning hand just like she lucked her way into this high stakes poker game by sleeping with the right men.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I thought in the thumbnail she was pushing her breasts together and using the breasts to go all in

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    poker unironically is for tryhards and losers

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      this. Blackjack is the superior game.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I got screamed at by a random dude at my local casino for playing black jack wrong.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I would've just laughed in his face. They hate that.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Well maybe you should have played it correctly you homosexual. Every time I see morons splitting tens I want to hurt them.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The way other players play their hand has absolutely no effect whatsoever on your odds of winning.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Yes, but it's infuriating when they play wrong and it works out for them.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              incorrect

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Once again we see alll poker players are losers.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Well maybe you should have played it correctly you homosexual. Every time I see morons splitting tens I want to hurt them.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The funny part is I split queens. It was my last hand of the night and just wanted to finish in a funny way.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              top panel is that guy's face when

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How could she cheat tho? I think she just got lucky

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    She's most likely cheating. Jake Paul's manager is staking her (the guy with cowboy hat in the video). She had 0 experience in high stakes cash games before appearing on this stream. She keeps changing her story. She's the one that offered to refund Garrett. Why would she give back 100k if she thought she won fair and square?

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The gay who cried he lost

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >OMG YOU GAMBLED IN A GAMBLING GAME? MUST BE CHEATING!

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Poker morons in this thread

    Scenario 1
    >He already raised her to test her out
    >She called
    >He should have raised her again by double instead of going all in
    Dude is a poker moron for making such an obvious power play with nothing

    Scenario 2
    >He went all in
    >She should have folded unless she had something
    >To go all in with nothing when it is your decision to do so is moronic
    She is cheating

    There is no game on earth where such a play would happen unless the person was new at a local game for $10 a hand, not six figures with supposed pros.

    It is written all over his face as he replays it in his mind after losing, he did all the expected things but she knew what he had from the start, her and her handler got greedy and risked blowing their scam, fitting it comes weeks after the chess thing where such a cheating method was talked about.

    She was cheating.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >he doesn't think women would make a genuinely moronic decision just to frick with you
      kek

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Are you implying that her handlers knew the exact cards that were going to come out for the river, even the last card of the river that redrawn?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      absolute moron
      she played him like a fiddle and you homosexuals can keep crying about it

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The guy
    She won fair and square, by just being cheeky and then the stupid butthole starts crying about it
    Pathetic little man-baby who got btfo by a pair of breasts

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So to sum it up, some dumb b***h made a 'poor' play and everyone is calling it cheating?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yes

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      she knew was he was doing, the guy was bluffing and everyone could see it
      She did not cheat

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I thought you had ace high so I knew my Jack high wasn’t good, but I decided to call you anyway
        uh-huh, not cheating

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          She just saw through his bullshit, how is that cheating
          literally the point of the game

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            the only thing that 'poker literate' homosexuals are going to point to is probability and in a game of chance that sometimes does not matter but they can't cope

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >She just saw through his bullshit
            not sure how you can say that. if she’s making the claim that she thought he had ace high and thus was behind in the hand, then she’s not really seeing through his bullshit

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              She could be playing games after still
              you people need to have sex

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you got me and have defended her honor admirably throughout this thread. hope she sees this one day

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                im gay but nice try

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                She's not gonna frick you homosexual.

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    She did nothing wrong. You call some bluffs and you leave some bluffs alone. It's literally how you play poker. Dumbasses with view of both hands are going durrr what if he had flush or straight, exceot neither could see each other's hands so both are just trying to bullshit the other one, for all he knew she could have had a higher straight or flush.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      She tried to call his bluff with a hand that wouldn't have worked for calling his bluff

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >wouldn't have worked
        Except it did work, which should make it clear your line of logic is flawed somewhere.

        >Being results-oriented in a game where chance plays a significant role
        ngmi
        [...]
        that's one of the hypotheses, using an rfid hack and some kind of vibrating device to signal when to call.
        [...]
        >You call some bluffs and you leave some bluffs alone
        You don't call a bluff with Jack-high unless you like to light your money on fire. Even with his worst bluff he's still the favorite to win.

        Jack isn't even that low of a card, basically what you're saying is no one ever bluffs with their highest card lower than a jack, except that's EXACTLY what he did. People do it all the time. It's not about the cards, it's about thinking if the opponent is faking it or not, that's why you read the person. That's exactly what she did and exactly the explanation she gave.
        Again, "favourite to win" is bullshit because it relies on having knowledge of both hands. Neither of them know what the other has.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >basically what you're saying is no one ever bluffs with their highest card lower than a jack
          No, what I'm saying is even the lowest holdings in his bluffing range (ie a suited connector like 78) has a decent chance of beating her bluff catcher.
          >That's exactly what she did and exactly the explanation she gave.
          She changed her "explanation" about 50 times which is another reason why people find her actions suspicious.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >No, what I'm saying is even the lowest holdings in his bluffing range (ie a suited connector like 78) has a decent chance of beating her bluff catcher.
            Knowledge only he has. Irrelevant to her since she doesn't see his cards. Furthermore it's still a gamble because he doesn't see her cards either.
            >She changed her "explanation" about 50 times which is another reason why people find her actions suspicious.
            I watched the entire video and she only ever gave the explanation of "he always bluffs like this and she didn't think he actually had a hand that backed up his bliff this time".

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not gonna argue poker strategy with you because you obviously don't know what you're talking about. She changed her story many times in the video itself and since the video came out. She refunded the guy his 100k which is an admission of guilt in itself.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                If you can't explain it succinctly then you don't know shit and would have been eaten alive like he was.
                Also you're free to post all her other explanations with links and screenshots I'll believe it when I see it I'm calling your bluff right now.
                The only mistake she made was refunding his money, but as people in the original pair of videos said (the one shot after with the angry man in the hat saying she shouldn't have refunded him) they were business partners and she didn't want to sour their relationship.

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If you actually understand this picture and know whats going on, please get a fricking hobby, im begging you

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    WHEN I SAY BAD
    YOU SAY BEAT

    BAD

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Pokercels be like THE CORRECT PLAY WAS TO LOSE lmao just sit and repeat to yourselves how cucked you are by math

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      BUT YOU DON'T GET IT
      YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO PLAY THAT WAY BECAUSE.... YOU JUST ARE OK?!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        the amount of butthurt this is causing pokergays is more entertaining than any TV show or movie in the last decade

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          BUT YOU DON'T GET IT
          YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO PLAY THAT WAY BECAUSE.... YOU JUST ARE OK?!

          As a pokergay, I just find it hilarious because this has almost went mainstream and you see all these people who know absolutely fricking nothing about poker weighing in with their moronic opinions. People genuinely seem to think poker is like straight up gambling and nothing more: no strategy or skill. Just basically another form of blackjack or something, or bingo.

          I've lost count of how many times I've heard: "He's just mad cause he got beat fair and square by a girl." or "At the end of the day, they both took a gamble and he lost." or "I don't understand why her play was bad but him going all-in with a weaker hand is good."

          It's all so tiresome. How can people be so stupid?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            YOU CAN'T CALL A BLUFF THAT YOU'RE UNLIKELY TO WIN BECAUSE.... YOU JUST CAN'T, OKAY????

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Might as well play russian roulette if you are going to make moronic plays like that

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No thanks, the easy marks are clearly the pokercels.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >he took a gamble and lost
            he literally did, and trying to focus on why he SHOULDN'T have is inherently more moronic in a game of chance
            Most action I've seen in the poker community in years besides gay ass phil helmuth blowups

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >People genuinely seem to think poker is like straight up gambling and nothing more: no strategy or skill. Just basically another form of blackjack or something, or bingo.
            it is, you homosexual

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            luck is a major factor in poker
            each decision has a certain percentage chance to win - you can make the wrong play and still win because of luck
            morons like the guy in the video believe that she has to be cheating when the simple truth is she made a bad play and won anyways - she got lucky

            there is a reason "i'd rather be lucky than good" is a popular saying

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Of course luck is a factor. You can lose with pocket aces repeatedly even though pocket aces is the best hand in the game.

              That doesn't mean it is the correct decision to fold pocket aces preflop to a large bet because "I might get unlucky and lose this time"

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is this the new moronic offtopic thing that there's going to be daily threads about?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      poker is broadcast 365 days a year, frick off queer

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Wasn't this livestreamed to an online platform? What's next, you wanna talk about twitch drama on here?

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Climate change -> resource depletion -> justification for gentile holocaust

    Bill Gates
    Donald Trump
    Joe Biden

    All blackmailed by Israeli Epstein program

    We are all Amalekite survivors of an attempted israeli induced holocaust against our people

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >going all in with nothing
    >OMG HE'S SO BASED AND BIG BRAIN OMG WHAT AN INSANE MOVE
    >calling all in with nothing
    >OMG WHAT A STUPID MOVE NONONONONONONONONO YOU CANT DO THAT NOOOOOOO

    poker tards are something else

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it almost like bluffing and calling are two different things

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >all in with nothing

      He had a straight flush draw, you fricking moron. It was a semi-bluff, not a full on bluff with air because his hand had a chance to improve dramatically on the river.

      Also, going all-in with nothing is not the same as calling with nothing because you're not trying to get your opponent to call, you're trying to get them to fold because you want to win the pot but know that your hand has no showdown value, so the only way to win the pot is to scare your opponent into thinking that you have a much better hand than them.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        All I see when I read posts like these is a seething wojak typing through tears.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        and at that point he still had a near equivalent win probability as the chick with a jack high

        >NO BRO YOU DONT UNDERSTAND HE DIDN'T HAVE ~~*NOTHING*~~ HE HAD A MAYBE SOMETHING BRO DUDE PLEASE BELIEVE ME IT'S NOT LUCK PLEASE

        highest IQ pokercels

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          wow poker is easy when you can see everybody's cards

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          My God, this is like trying to explain quantum physics to a 5-year old.

          It doesn't matter that they had equal win probabilities because he is representing a variety of potential hands which her jack high, 4 kicker garbage doesn't beat. He could have queen, jack or king, queen, or and ace high flush draw, or a made hand already. Her hand beats almost none of his potential bluffing hands. Sure she could say to herself that he might have a hand like 8, 7 or 7, 6 but he is very unlikely to bluffing with much lower than that such as something crazy like 4, 3. So although she feels like he is bluffing, and she wants to hero call him, she simply is fricking crazy to call with a hand as bad as jack high.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            see

            YOU CAN'T CALL A BLUFF THAT YOU'RE UNLIKELY TO WIN BECAUSE.... YOU JUST CAN'T, OKAY????

            and

            BUT YOU DON'T GET IT
            YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO PLAY THAT WAY BECAUSE.... YOU JUST ARE OK?!

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              she won one hand

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                doesn't matter if you win by an inch or a mile

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >all of this text to justify pokercel cope

            Please start trading options so you can truly get fleeced

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Her hand beats almost none of his potential bluffing hands.
            >hand beats almost none
            >beats almost none
            >almost
            What's the issue, anon?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              It's really not worth the risk of losing your entire hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of chips just to gamble on that possibility.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            If your explanation relies on both of them having knowledge of opponent's cards it doesn't work. His potential bluff means nothing. For all he knew she had a potential bluff.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          He was bluffing you moron.

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I call

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How the frick does a J and a 4 win over that guys' 8 and 7?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      pair of tens, jack being the highest card

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the amount of whiteknights defending her just makes me think you Black folk are trolling

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *