I can tell you what it shouldn't look like >No Nolan shit >No High Fantasy crap >No Tarantino >No Meme Club >No Forrest Dump
Any argument for Schindler's List would be an appeal to emotion. Both Godfathers belong somewhere in the top 50, not sure about the top 20 though. And Shawshank is far from #1 by 100 miles
Have sex you fricking losers.
There are like 100 billion movies in existence. Picking "the best" is literally fricking impossible and completely subjective. It's all dependent on personal taste, but what I think should be agreed on is that there is no reason to exclude certain genres as being lesser and so not deserving of the best just because you don't like it.
I hate this board and it should have been deleted like qa
How the frick is a fricking comic book movie number one on IMDB? Is capeshit really THAT popular with normalhomosexuals? Do normalBlack folk really talk about capeshit at work with their peers?
>Is capeshit really THAT popular with normalhomosexuals? Do normalBlack folk really talk about capeshit at work with their peers?
Yes and yes. Zoomers don't watch anything made before 2000. The zoomers who work with me only talk about Spider-Man and shit like that. Older Normalgays don't watch anything made before the 1970's unless they're women who like The Wizard of Oz or The Sound of Music.
Nolan Batman have to be the most overrated movies in existence.
Barely any artistic value, poor choregraphy, awkward dialogs and an overall sense of blandness.
It was good shitposting material and that's about it.
This list is shit, but so is the Sight and Sound director and critics poll that is mostly black-and-white movies, and even some silent movies. Not saying those movies are bad, but there should be three different considerations for the greatest movies of all time. It's unfair to judge a silent movie or a black-and-white movie next to a movie with sound and color. The earlier movies are, of course, more influential, but they are objectively inferior. In fact, the two most influential silent and black-and-white movies never even make the list. Directors and critics are afraid to cite The Birth of a Nation from 1915 and King Kong from 1933 among the greatest films, despite the fact that they are largely responsible for modern cinema as we know it.
>It's unfair to judge a silent movie or a black-and-white movie next to a movie with sound and color. The earlier movies are, of course, more influential, but they are objectively inferior.
You can look up the Sight and Sound rankings right now and find shitposty movies like Man with a Movie Camera and Un Chien Andalou among the "greatest films of all time." The Birth of a Nation, Nosferatu, and Nanook of the North are nowhere to be found. It's very subjective and silly.
I have looked up the Sight and Sound rankings, and I've seen most of the films on it. Man with a Movie Camera and Un Chien Andalou are both better films than Nanook of the North at the very least. Birth of a Nation is definitely better, though not Griffith's best, and Nosferatu can be argued. Berlin: Symphony of a Great City is the better version of Man With a Movie Camera btw (webm related)
Nanook of the North has traditionally been elementary school students' first exposure to booba, so it's automatically better. And I would say it's influential since it created the documentary genre, even if it's not a very good movie on a technical level. Triumph of the Will is also absent from Sight and Sound's list for obvious reasons, despite being influential/significant.
>And I would say it's influential since it created the documentary genre, even if it's not a very good movie on a technical level.
Just because it's the earliest documentary you've seen, doesn't mean it created the documentary genre. The Battle of the Somme (1916), South (1918), Anniversary of the Revolution (1918) are other documentaries that released prior to Nanook of the North, and I'm sure there are plenty others. >Triumph of the Will is also absent from Sight and Sound's list for obvious reasons, despite being influential/significant.
Not everything is for political reasons. Triumph of the Will is a fine documentary, but I wouldn't list it as one of the greatest films ever made. Granted, I wouldn't included a lot of the films that actually made the list either. Everyone's taste is subjective. I just take the Sigh and Sound list as a list full of good movies. I don't see it as a definitive best of all time list
You can look up the Sight and Sound rankings right now and find shitposty movies like Man with a Movie Camera and Un Chien Andalou among the "greatest films of all time." The Birth of a Nation, Nosferatu, and Nanook of the North are nowhere to be found. It's very subjective and silly.
They're probably going by the movies that influenced the medium the most, which is 100x better than "ooow Semi truck defy gravity. 10/10."
if you've unironically rated anything on imdb in the past year, you are part of the problem and are a pathetic little moron
What should the top 13 look like instead?
I can tell you what it shouldn't look like
>No Nolan shit
>No High Fantasy crap
>No Tarantino
>No Meme Club
>No Forrest Dump
Any argument for Schindler's List would be an appeal to emotion. Both Godfathers belong somewhere in the top 50, not sure about the top 20 though. And Shawshank is far from #1 by 100 miles
>I can tell you what it shouldn't look like
cope
t. voted The Dark Knight a 10
No, you need to say what your top movies are.
>what it shouldn't look like
you just did a double negative with your green text
Have sex you fricking losers.
There are like 100 billion movies in existence. Picking "the best" is literally fricking impossible and completely subjective. It's all dependent on personal taste, but what I think should be agreed on is that there is no reason to exclude certain genres as being lesser and so not deserving of the best just because you don't like it.
I hate this board and it should have been deleted like qa
>t. capeshitter
So nothing, gaylord?
How the frick is a fricking comic book movie number one on IMDB? Is capeshit really THAT popular with normalhomosexuals? Do normalBlack folk really talk about capeshit at work with their peers?
You know you dont have to be that much of a contrarian to fit in here right?
>How the frick is a fricking comic book movie number one on IMDB?
It isn't. Look carefully at the picture.
>Is capeshit really THAT popular with normalhomosexuals? Do normalBlack folk really talk about capeshit at work with their peers?
Yes and yes. Zoomers don't watch anything made before 2000. The zoomers who work with me only talk about Spider-Man and shit like that. Older Normalgays don't watch anything made before the 1970's unless they're women who like The Wizard of Oz or The Sound of Music.
Because most people just go, "that was a pretty good movie, 10/10"
The only one out of place is schindlers list. Boring fiction that was melodramatic
Even without looking it up I know that shawshank's redemption is in the top three. Now that's a true overrated piece of shit.
What should be the top 5?
Pluto Nash
Big Momma's House
Daddy DayCare
Good Burger
Half Baked
DERSU UZALA by AKIRA KUROSAWA
Indians have ruined imdb. All the shitty Indian movies are going to the top of the list
See any popular, flavor of the month movie on Letterboxd. I would say 80% of the rankings are posted by teenagers.
Because movie ratings shouldn't be compared to each other as a sign of which movie is superior especially in these fractional increments.
Nolan Batman have to be the most overrated movies in existence.
Barely any artistic value, poor choregraphy, awkward dialogs and an overall sense of blandness.
It was good shitposting material and that's about it.
Yep
This list is shit, but so is the Sight and Sound director and critics poll that is mostly black-and-white movies, and even some silent movies. Not saying those movies are bad, but there should be three different considerations for the greatest movies of all time. It's unfair to judge a silent movie or a black-and-white movie next to a movie with sound and color. The earlier movies are, of course, more influential, but they are objectively inferior. In fact, the two most influential silent and black-and-white movies never even make the list. Directors and critics are afraid to cite The Birth of a Nation from 1915 and King Kong from 1933 among the greatest films, despite the fact that they are largely responsible for modern cinema as we know it.
>It's unfair to judge a silent movie or a black-and-white movie next to a movie with sound and color. The earlier movies are, of course, more influential, but they are objectively inferior.
You can look up the Sight and Sound rankings right now and find shitposty movies like Man with a Movie Camera and Un Chien Andalou among the "greatest films of all time." The Birth of a Nation, Nosferatu, and Nanook of the North are nowhere to be found. It's very subjective and silly.
I have looked up the Sight and Sound rankings, and I've seen most of the films on it. Man with a Movie Camera and Un Chien Andalou are both better films than Nanook of the North at the very least. Birth of a Nation is definitely better, though not Griffith's best, and Nosferatu can be argued. Berlin: Symphony of a Great City is the better version of Man With a Movie Camera btw (webm related)
Nanook of the North has traditionally been elementary school students' first exposure to booba, so it's automatically better. And I would say it's influential since it created the documentary genre, even if it's not a very good movie on a technical level. Triumph of the Will is also absent from Sight and Sound's list for obvious reasons, despite being influential/significant.
>And I would say it's influential since it created the documentary genre, even if it's not a very good movie on a technical level.
Just because it's the earliest documentary you've seen, doesn't mean it created the documentary genre. The Battle of the Somme (1916), South (1918), Anniversary of the Revolution (1918) are other documentaries that released prior to Nanook of the North, and I'm sure there are plenty others.
>Triumph of the Will is also absent from Sight and Sound's list for obvious reasons, despite being influential/significant.
Not everything is for political reasons. Triumph of the Will is a fine documentary, but I wouldn't list it as one of the greatest films ever made. Granted, I wouldn't included a lot of the films that actually made the list either. Everyone's taste is subjective. I just take the Sigh and Sound list as a list full of good movies. I don't see it as a definitive best of all time list
They're probably going by the movies that influenced the medium the most, which is 100x better than "ooow Semi truck defy gravity. 10/10."
Normies rate movies based on whether they recognize the title or not.