Why are writers so afraid of AI when it can't even do basic stuff like this?
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Why are writers so afraid of AI when it can't even do basic stuff like this?
Why are writers so afraid of AI when it can't even do basic stuff like this?
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
|
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
The AI negotiation is in preparation for the future. It's streaming revenue that triggered having a strike right now.
i've been using it for recommendations
video games
music
movies and tv
for frickin months, and it's really good for that
How fricking sad that you have to resort to a fricking robot in order to get good movie recommendations when that's what this board should be mostly about. I mean, I get it, Sydney Sweeney has big breasts, but rare is the occasion where there's a thread that actually discusses film and good recommendations.
And so I don't come off as a hypocrite, I suggest McCabe and Mrs. Miller. I feel like not enough people know about that movie. Fog of War is another good one. Oh and pic related, "Rectify" is a really really good show.
>How fricking sad that you have to resort to a fricking robot in order to get good movie recommendations when that's what this board should be mostly about. I mean, I get it, Sydney Sweeney has big breasts, but rare is the occasion where there's a thread that actually discusses film and good recommendations.
wtf are you talking about this board is for shitposting and saying "for you".
Bane memes have been dead for years
For you.
then show me his body
that's a big claim
elaborate on that
it's kind of sad. i can't ask a question anywhere without someone insulting me or asking me a question about why i want what i asked for, or just people derailing things. it's exhausting so i just don't bother anymore.
i don't think preferring Cinemaphile to be less "annoy the living frick out of everyone all the time" is "reddit" but a lot of these people do.
i've been here since fricking 07 though lol
It’s really not every board that’s like that though. I recently started painting miniatures and was surprised by /tg/ being so chill. You’ll still get some of the regular stuff but there’s also just… dudes who like a hobby.. and wanting to discuss that hobby with other people
>i've been here since fricking 07 though lol
Same friend, I miss when this site had less schizos. I learned so much and discovered so much great shit back then thanks to Cinemaphile, nowadays you have to sift through so much insane schizo babble it's not even worth it anymore.
lmao also where the frick is that webm from
Rectify
well that explains why he was so sad playing sonic the hedgehog
Rectify was pure kino.
I will rewatch Rectify tonight, thanks for reminding me it existed.
>How fricking sad that you have to resort to using an available tool for its intended purpose?
You also get mad at people for Googling recommendations based on what they like or other similar movies?
you dont?
You should have posted Sydney's breasts, would be more appreciated
>but rare is the occasion where there's a thread that actually discusses film and good recommendations.
Very true, and you're based for being the change you want to see and dropping some recs.
What do you ask exactly? Can you post an example?
yeah here's an example
>what is a game that has loot and leveling like borderlands, but is 2d action sidescroller like metal slug. also it must have pixel graphics. also it must be (whatever)
The only reason any of this is impressive is that google basically nuked their search engine and uses it entirely to push ads and bullshit. It's completely unusable. 90% of the things you can do with AI should be possible with a search engine but there is no money in it so search engines were purposely neutered. Mark my words ChatGPT will be too. Ones corpos get their grubby hands on it it will be used to sell you shit you don't need and tell you shit you don't need or want to hear. 5 years from now you'll type something in ChatGPT and you'l look at the answer and go "that's not even close to what I was asking you fricking homosexual"
Sure some of these AI engines are open source so anyone can just make a new AI chatbot, but the same goes for search engines, but the internet trends towards consolidation toward the lowest common denominator, and the AI technology will stagnate because techbros realize there is more money in milking it then in developing it. This is fine for me. I use it to draw fetish porn and it works really well if you feed it the right inputs.
Case and point. If you went back in time to 2004 and told someone this they'd be like "yeah Ive been using google to do this"
And yet it messes up basic info. I once asked chatgpt for the best albums of 1986 and it gave me a few albums from a completely different year
does it actually give obscure recs? i don't need an AI to tell me to play dark souls or something
It does if you ask
It wasn't that long ago that it'd have struggled to draw the bottle at all
In the space of perhaps less than 10 years we've got from AI being this nebulous 'maybe someday' idea, to having to genuinely consider preparing for a world where AI can and does do many things better than we can
AI while performing it's function isn't actually "real" though, it's just a sum of what human beings have already done, and kind of letting it autoplay with mixed results. At the end of the day it's still not its own thing.
Dude. You could say that for humans too. Have (you) ever came up with an idea that is 100% unique and not derived from any past inputs or experience?
probably
>this television stuff isn't even real imagination, it does the thinking for you, it will never catch on, what good are dreams transmitted by a mahcine?
>this printing press shit has killed the soul of writing, what good is a word carelessly copied by an unthinking machine?
>writing? taking the cadence and emotion out of the spoken word and turning it into a flat symbol on a surface? what good is a thought imprinted on a rock?
This
Every moron "duuur it still can't get this one thing right"
Like 6 months ago the art it made was just blobs of color
>everyone missing the point implicitly made by OP
cattle board
Maybe your point wasn't as strong as you thought. Nobody knows the sample used in the single study cited. It doesn't hold water at any angle.
I'm not OP. And Halpern 2012 isn't a study, it's a volume citing several studies.
>It doesn't hold water at any angle
Nice one.
>Maybe your point wasn't as strong as you thought
maybe anon is a college aged woman
haha gottem
>nooooooo you have to respond correctly
Hey, pot.
>woman hate thread disguised as AI hate thread gets derailed by chatGPT bots acting like women
It has more depth than any screenplay done nowdays tho
a fricking rock on the sidewalk has more depth than today's screenplays
I can't even figure out how to b prompt midjourney to create a tilted bottle. It flat out will not do it.
a year ago AI couldnt draw hands either.
>b-b-b-b-but muh fluid dyanmics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
is this final cope supposed to be your shield?
How is that fluid dynamics? I agree AI has come an incredibly long way in a short time though. It can probably do fluid dynamics i think.
it still can't lol
It definitely can, just not the shitty AI they make public
>AI is female
later virgins
Because writers can't get it right either.
there's no fricking way that 40% of college women get that wrong. this has to be chud circlejerk bait.
90% of divorces are initiated by college-educated women
have you never interacted with a women?
It's definitely fricking true. The only women who get this right spend tons of their time drawing.
After 30 years, my sister has forgotten how to properly use a propane grill multiple times.
I have no doubt in my mind that woman constantly forget how to function in life to make room for emotions and gossip.
I remember discussing history with a group of friends and only the guys could contribute, the girls just made comments like "I wish I could remember things like that" or "How do guys know all this stuff?"
I have noticed this my entire life but have never been brave enough to point it out
Women don't seem to retain information unless it is completely relevant to their lifestyle or interests
Whereas men seem to accumulate knowledge and apply it to other situations as they arrive
Last week a group of women asked how tall 6ft was in centimetres and I said "roughly 183cm" and they all looked at me in shock and asked how on earth I knew that
Men learn skills
Women learn men.
Writers can't do basic stuff like that either.
undercover woman-hating thread?
I am all for it
>40% of college women got it wrong
wut? am I also moronic or is this just American education?
You're supposed to write that A is incorrect because the meniscus is not represented.
That's the wrong answer moron
What's the right answer?
t. woman
I just realized that the question itself is bad.
The assumption is that the bottle is tilted and gravity is always straight down, but if this moronic question omits that what's turning isn't the bottle relative to the Earth but your view of the bottle relative to both, then you can make any answer correct.
Is that what's going on here?
It says THE BOTTLE has been tilted
You're correct, he's just baiting you
The bottle is tilted, but there's no explicit mention of gravity or the direction of gravity.
The explanation for why women are like this is usually 'bad spatial reasoning' but honestly I think it's deeper than that: women are bad at abstraction, so they don't automatically infer gravity like a man would. See picrel.
you're moronic
triggered roasties ITT
>autism
Let go dude, Jesus.
Are you moronic? Gravity is a fact of life. It's implied unless stated otherwise.
>there's no explicit mention of gravity or the direction of gravity.
the direction of gravity is demonstrated in the first diagram dipshit
that could just be planetary wobble or someone jumping up and down with the bottle
>Women are moronic because they don't make edgy racist jokes
Bold take.
It's like one of those Jim Crow era literacy tests, intentionally written to be able to pass or fail any answer you want to pass or fail.
>women are moronic
>no it's your fault the question is a trick
If the thread is alive when i finish taking a shit i'll post a picture with those test questions.
Here i am.
Anyone brave enough can fill out this test to show his galaxy brain.
they used parentheses earlier in the test. why couldn't they do that here, to resolve the ambiguity?
> Verb noun, adverb.
seems more correct than
> Verb adverb, noun.
so I will conclude that they really meant
>Spell "backwards" forwards.
which is just "backwards"
Some of these are needlessly ambigious.
Is 14 asking for the first after h in the alphabet, or the line? I know the correct answer, the problem is that you're just gonna make people nervous and then they make mistakes.
Some people really are just bad test takers, despite being relatively intelligent.
>t. dumbass but good test taker
>pic
Genuine self-perception problem
>I know the correct answer
doest mean you'll pass
>1. draw a line around
>4. draw a line around
>5. circle
Black person this test has already given me autism
For maximum autism see question #20. And think carefully.
backwards?
"b a c k w a r d s , f o r w a r d s"
wait if the line is
spell backwards, forwards wouldnt it be
either you have to spell backwards forwards which is
b a c k w a r d s
or spell backwards , (emphasize on the ,) forwards
so you need to spell forwards backwards
so
s d r a w r o f
wouldnt that be a correct interpretation also?
All answers are correct, but you don't get to decide which will make you pass the test.
what exactly is the purpose of these?
Making Black folk fail the test to prove they're too stupid to live free in society.
>what exactly is the purpose of these?
It’s a test full of “trick” questions, that determine a number of things.
To correctly answer the questions, a person needs to know the alphabet, basic geometric shapes, basic numbers and sequencing (which includes basic multiplication and addition), and the person needs to be able to follow short one sentence instructions, where the sequence of the task is not laid out first to last within the sentence.
Standardized tests routinely have questions like this, but laid out in longer paragraph form.
Some of my female grade school teachers would likely have answered some of the questions incorrectly.
A literacy test designed to stop Blacks from voting in Louisiana
Rate me.
3 wrong.
See me after class.
Really? Or do you simply want to see me after class?
>Or do you simply want to see me after class?
D-Do you want me to want to see you after class?
Sigh, as long as you are cute...
Cute? I am a man. Men shouldn't be cute.
I'm a fricking bear.
bears are cute
Not that kind of bear, 'nony.
wtf are you talking about, 3 is correct.
I think he means 3 in total, not the third question
how did I do
question 1 is moronic because it says "the" and not "a", 1 isn't a part of the sentence and there is no specific letter so what
>1 isn't a part of the sentence
but is *the number* of that sentence
like the sentence bellow is number two
Yeah but there's a period separating it from the actual sentence.
you are missing the point, the number is not part of the sentence but it is the number of the sentence
a. like this is sentence "a"
2. this is sentence "2"
III. and this is sentence "III"
pretty badly lol
9, 10, 11, what are you thinking?
>9
missed the "two," I thought the trick was that there is only one Z in there so you should only cross one even though it says "letters"
>10
missed the "last" when scanning for the first word starting with L
>11
this one is me being moronic, I read it as "(the number bellow) one million" instead of "the number (bellow one million)"
also I didn't see the second part but I already saw that other anon's answer so it's pointless to do it now
My application is late.
Do I get the job?
19. You forgot the black dot in the circle.
>The question was somehow written to trick women in particular
If there wasn’t gravity (or acceleration) the water wouldn’t settle like it has in figure A
The question literally says the bottle is tilted, not that your view in relation to it is tilted. It's not a trick question, it's really very simple, stop trying to invent holes to justify other people's stupidity.
Motion is relative. We've known this for thousands of years. Do you flip out whenever someone says the sun moves across the sky?
Good thing there's an A and B diagram clearly illustrating how much the bottle has moved from it's original position.
This kvetching about the wording of the question misses the point of the study anyhow. This is not just about who has a better grasp of water physics, but about general cognitive ability. If one gender can't comprehend a hypothetical scenario or set of instructions, that indicates a relative lack of cognitive ability.
>am I also moronic
>Am I just stupid
You both questioned yourselves but have it correct
>You both questioned yourselves
Because the question is such a no-brainer unless you're a woman that people assume there's some trick to it. It couldn't possibly be that easy, right?
Gravity is not mentioned anywhere, your answer is wrong.
G force can be infered by the first image since in 0 G the liquid wouldn't be at the "bottom" of the bottle.
Space itself is not mentioned, you have no idea where gravity in the second picture would act. You just assume things.
The existence of the bottle implies it inhabits a position in space.
There is no bottle. It's a rough sketch ofba bottle ona piece of paper, scanned and visualized on a computer or phone screen. With academics you have to get as anal as possible anon.
do you fail every exam question because you can't understand the question?
"What do you see written here?"
>10
"It's the number ten."
"No! It's in binary so it's the number 2!"
Shut up moron. You are not as smart as you think you are.
Eve yhough it's shitty and awful it's overhyped by morons. Ai gays will tell you with a straight face the right inages look good, infact better than anything a human could render. Everybody with a brain knows ai is a gimmick we are worried about the 50% of people with sub 100iq who eat this shit up
>Eve yhough it's shitty and awful it's overhyped by morons
Really? Why do writers want to use it to work for them then?
So the "I'm an ideas guy" will eventually be the only person working in TV and film. They just say their idea and the AI's do everything else.
wow thats a nice building I wonder how they can afford that
Dolores and Maeve will be angry.
Isn't the issue here that the images of tilting bottles that the AI is trained on typically involve bottles in motion where the fluid inside is also in motion?
Am I just stupid or would it not be like this?
You are correct but a large number of women and I am sure a few men think the water line will align with the bottle
I think it’s because they’re looking at the symbol of the bottle (ie the drawing) and not envisioning it as a real object. So they just view it as a simple rotation.
Then explain this, from the same chapter of Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.) :
>Kalichman (1989) investigated the possibility that the results refl ect some
idiosyncrasy of the test, rather than sex differences in either the knowledge that water remains horizontal or the ability to draw an approximately horizontal line. Kalichman devised a more “ecologically valid” (i.e., more like the real world) test in which the tilted glass was held in a human hand. An example of his stimuli is shown in Figure 3.13 .
>Kalichman found that signifi cantly fewer college women than college men
draw an approximately horizontal line to indicate the water level in both
the standard test format and in the human context format. He concluded that
“sex differences on the water-level task remain robust regardless of task
context” (p. 138).
If anything that is even more difficult as you don't actually look at the water in a cup when you drink it.
Are you a college woman by any chance?
Sis, she is literally sipping the waterline, how can you even get this wrong?
>glass half full
>tilted it way past 45 degrees
this dumb b***h splashing water everywhere
Yeah I hope she's wearing no bra
>in this image a woman is being waterboarded by her captors, estimate the time before she starts chocking
>they all suddenly know the answer
God I love The Prisoner
why does the water in the picture care about which way gravity goes though, it can stay whatever way it wants
calm down Picasso
proof that women can easily be replaced by AI
Writers can't do that either
AI is getting better. Though I do think it's more likely we'll be working alongside it, not watching helplessly as it takes over.
5 years ago it did creepy dog and cat faces in everything. People already forgot just how quickly generative ai came from nothing.
>me on the bottom right
Cup with steel ball is lighter because the ball isn't adding to the weight of the cup while the ping pong ball does. Assuming of course that the balls displays equal amounts of water.
negative
The second the steel ball starts displacing the water the weight is added despite where the ball is anchored.
Why? How?
ping pong lift beaker, steel ball push beaker down
That's doesn't explain why. Ball on left displaces the same amount?
The trick to the test is that the string on the ping pong ball
>displays
I read it in an asian voice
The scale won't tip, asuming that the balls have equal volume and that pong pong ball mass is negligible.
Can't believe I wasted time making this shit. I even verified it with a kitchen scale and a metal object. The ping pong ball does not matter since it really just lowers the average density on that side since it is attached to the beaker. The other ball could also be a ping pong ball and that side would still lower.
the ping pong ball does matter (or rather just need to be light than water) because of the bouyant force it exerts. The right side ball also couldnt be a ping pong ball otherwise it wouldnt remain submerged.
>The right side ball also couldnt be a ping pong ball otherwise it wouldnt remain submerged.
You can replace the string with a rod to hold it in place.
would it then not be just the exact same as the left side?
>the ping pong ball does matter (or rather just need to be light than water) because of the bouyant force it exerts.
newton's 3rd law
any buoyant force is counteracted by the downward force the ball exerts on the water
tl;dw steel ball side drops
>video explaining
>instantly think that it will be a 15 minute video talking pointlessly instead of instantly giving the answer
>it actually instantly gives the answer
C
cool i was right
im a literal moron for getting tihs wrong sigh.
yes
I also got it wrong and wasn't even close to the real answer, there is no instinctive way to tell the displacement of the water is what tilts the balance, either someone told you that or you discovered it through experimentation
both sides displace the same amount of water
that's not fair the steel is heavier
40% of women are mindless sex bots
>AI has advanced to the point it's as intelligent as women
I don't know whether I should laugh or cry.
>sick of job, of the world, of life
>get an opportunity to frick things up
>take it
the strike has little to do with AI
Literally impossible because it doesn't specify the shape of the bottle. There's no reason to assume it's cylindrical.
Pic related is you.
Whether it's cylindrical or square bottomed or whatever, the surface of the water settles parallel to the Earth's surface.
The instruction says "Draw a line to show how the water line would look." It doesn't say "Draw a line to show the angle of the water line." You need to calculate the height of the line.
It doesn't do bottles well because it hasn't been trained on bottles because nobody gives a frick about bottles.
Now ask it to make smut and see the results
That's because you guys type artists name and artstation to fish for art to steal.
>this dumb Black person still thinks ai art is cut and paste
>making shit up about things you dont know
fox and grapes situation, I'm guessing, AKA a poorgay without a good GPU
Yeah, we already know AI is solely used by braindead pajeet coomers.
virtuesignalling that you don't fap is peak midwit behavior
AI is literally garbage
those pics are quite good
Hmm
I'd love frick those dumb b***hes in the mouth
why are you not fricking your sister and her friend
The crucial failing of AI is that it will never figure out how to meme, and if it does it'll just be a bunch of words.
This is exactly the kind of stupid nonsensical shit that AI will eventually create as memes
AI can only do what they have been programmed to do.
And the programmers are moronic
AI proves at least 40% of women are moronic. Based robot overlords.
Tik tok tik tok. AI improves by the day. Let's see how those bottles look next year. Meanwhile the "writers" will be the same untalented leeches
Are people really surprised that foids are moronic.
Females are obviously fricking moronic, but how is it possible that 40% of females and LESS THAN 1% of males get this wrong...
I'm low IQ, I have the intelligence of a woman but the self awareness of a man
It's a cursed life
I spent about an hour the other day trying to get two AI to make a table with some information about foods. It kept fricking up, even when I corrected it, it was unable to fix the mistakes. At some point it made a multiplication error I have no idea how, the equation it used was correct yet the resulting calculation was completely wrong. AI development is extremely impressive but at the same time I feel it's a bit premature to call it AI.
Yup, I've had AI make basic math errors simply adding up 12 numbers
I wonder how many people fricked up their taxes with AI lmao
Not only that, after I pointed out the error, asked it to explain the error and correct it, it explained the error and made another error
It sometimes has trouble with basic instructions (use ONLY words on this list - then it makes up it's own words)
That said this is stuff that will be solved. It's a language model. Get it to understand how to use a calculator and it's fine.
Most likely the wording. "If you were to tip the bottle [in person, in the real world, in real life, etc], where would the water line be relative to the bottle's current position? (Draw below.)" That would almost guaranteed make that 40% drop far lower. Kind of ironic considering this is perfect man wording and many of us are terrible at taking social hints. I'd like to see a study on that one considering how odd it is.
if you did it fast enough then the water would still be flat on the bottom of the bottle so yeah it should be more clear
no, it wouldn't. it would be sloshing around but it certainly would never, under any circumstance, maintain a diagonal line.
yeah but where's the gravity?
i didn't use any
then its 100% correct
>They should've worded in such a way where it was assumed the test taker wasn't familiar with object permeance, it's not being fair to women otherwise
Anon I...
Because they fundamentally do not understand what the current hyped AI even is.
For me, it's the top left.
Captivating.
It says to me that that uncertainty is most certain, a dredicament mankind exists in.
The sheer determination of one's will cannot escape the inevitable. As perilous as it may seem, just simply step back and remember..."Aspice illos impares digitos.
They'll be striking if chimps learn to write out of fear that a fricking simian could replace them. They know they're fricking hacks, which is why it takes a room full of them to write ANYTHING, and why they can't do OC any more while they focus on sequels and remakes.
whats the problem here.
4 is okay I guess, 3 could maybe work if we headcannon that the glass is actively being sloshed around. So about 50% accurate… frick, is AI female?
Top right is obviously wrong. The rest might sort of work if we assume the glass is being tilted, so the water is moving. Looks like AI doesn’t understand how fluids work in a glass when under gravity, but that’s beyond current AI scope I guess. Humans have this knowledge through experience from handling water
it goes on..
globe head AI
the important skills matter.
Thanks, Doc
Holy shit women are moronic
>be educated w*man
>Can't even make basic predictions of the natural world.
I presume uneducated women are somehow worse.
Reminds me of the cope about Black folk not perceiving some angular optical illusions because something something society.
Anyone know what percentage of men got it wrong? Wild ass guess would be only like 10-15%.
All that's going to happen is what's always happened with advancements in technology. It will allow you to do more work for less effort ie make you more productive. Professional animators used to draw individual frames by hand but technology now allows literal children to make mini movies if they have access to a laptop that has more than 4GB of RAM. So you went from making 10 frames to 100 frames to possibly thousands of frames a day with the animator just touching up the problems and ensuring the AI creates the right images. Someone still has to sit down and perfect your work unless you're really considering publishing your AI TV show on a first draft.
They'll just free up time from menial activities to more of the creative side of things. This will just push the quality through the roof. In a decade or so you'll se 4k 144fps animations being the standard for most studios. You won't have to wait 2 years for a show because of production delays. A lot more anime is going to be produced and a lot more high quality games.
However studios will still frick up because of last minute creative changes forcing VFX artists and animators to throw out thousands of frames they've spent time perfecting.
So stop with the infantile fear mongering. It's as moronic as a farmer fearing the tractor or the plough might taking his job. They're just tools. Gosh some of you aren't even midwits, you're just moronic.
yesterday I watched 2 women unable to enter a dog park because the gate was closed. they stood there looking dumb for 10 minutes until a guy walked up and just opened the gate. I was dying laughing.
I once saw 30 college students waiting outside a door until I showed up, opened it, and walked in. Then my classmates joined me.
ayo we're back baby
Here's why.
eh, its no "bottomless"
Women are not deep.. they are not even shallow
>Draw a line to show how the water line would look
Should be "Draw a line to show what the water line would look like".
Do I pass the test?
shutup
>asking a portrait AI to draw you a bottle of water
obviously not going to work
it doesn't mean the AI cant easily be programmaed to do it