"why cant I have Marvels that are male? why an all-black Black Panther?

>March 22 (Reuters) - Walt Disney Co(DIS.N), opens new tabon Friday said that remarks by activist investor Nelson Peltz criticizing the company for making movies dominated by female and Black actors is evidence that he shouldn't be on Disney's board.

>Peltz, whose fight to join Disney as a director has become one of the year's most bitter and closely watched board battles, in an interview with the Financial Times said Disney's films have become too focused on delivering a message, and not enough on quality storytelling. He specifically took issue with "The Marvels" and "Black Panther."

>"Why do I have to have a Marvel that’s all women? Not that I have anything against women, but why do I have to do that?" Peltz said in the interview, published on Friday. "Why can’t I have Marvels that are both? Why do I need an all-Black cast?”

>Asked about Peltz's remarks, a Disney spokesperson responded: "This is exactly why Nelson Peltz shouldn't be anywhere near a creatively driven company."

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >man uses common sense
    >this is why he can't have power
    Wow

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's amazing, isn't it? How just flat-out sensible he sounds. Yet Disney recoils from it like a vampire fleeing sunlight.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's amazing, isn't it? How just flat-out sensible he sounds. Yet Disney recoils from it like a vampire fleeing sunlight.

      well? Did they answer his questions?

      very legitimate questions

      No, he is not talking "common sense", he is not sensible, and they are not legitimate questions. You fail to appreciate the intersectional power and oppression hierarchy at play. We don't have all male casts, all white, straight-CIS male movies BECAUSE THAT IS LITERALLY WHAT WE HAVE HAD FOREVER! And this group does not need to be lifted up, you are not oppressed. Women, POC, people of diverse backgrounds, LGB and TRANS have rights and humanity that have been trampled on for centuries and millenia, all to the BENEFIT of white, straight, CIS males. So forgive me if I don't feel any sympathy just yet. Shut people out of media and movies (except to play the villians, which is historically accurate!!) for 30 years and it still won't even start to redress the frickton of injustice that has been metered out by people who look like you and talk your language. Decolonise our literary and cultural spaces! No white people is a good start.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I know this is a meme copypasta but it's not a coincidence shortly after pushing them out everything starts bombing

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >NOBODY, regardless of race, wants to see an action movie with a female lead.
          They have in the past. Aliens, Terminator 2, Tomb Raider, Kill Bill, Alita: Battle Angel, even the first Wonder Woman. They just have to appeal to men. The problem with garbage with Birds of Prey and The Marvels and Madame Web is that they're trying to make action films starring women specifically for women and hardly anyone wants to see those. They don't appeal to anyone except a handful of urban libs. The masses of women want to see stuff like Barbie, not capes.

          It's not pasta, I write it myself. I'm disappointed you can so easily detect it's a troll, I thought for sure I would get some bites from raging conservatives, and some agreement from moron leftists. It usually doesn't take much less than this but I turned it up a notch too far. Btw frick everyone. Frick all the sides! And frick you too. People are such pussies, cry more. About everything.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You can't pretend to be an ultra-lefty here. Ultra-lefties like echo chambers like Reddit and Tumblr.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I wonder how many posts on social media would unironically agree with this if posted on Reddit or X? Would they praise it for being brave, or would they dismiss this as an obvious troll?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it's more than just a different opinion of sense:
      he's questioning the agenda in a way that asks "WHY IS THIS NECESSARY"

      except the people he's asking this question to don't want people to ask questions about anything. ESPECIALLY not any questions that require them to provide evidence towards why such things "would be necessary"... no, they only want a blind and unquestioning obedience to their agenda.
      so he has to be sent away.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >he's questioning the agenda in a way that asks "WHY IS THIS NECESSARY"
        It's not : "is this necessary" it's really "this obviously doesn't make money, so why?"
        and that's the truth of the matter, the only people that spend money when they're pandered to are white people, so why not pander to people who actually give you money? Anything else is leadership failing their fiduciary duty to the company, so if that's the case, why are they in charge?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I disagree. Black people will absolutely spend money. Premium basketball shoes are proof. But the shit they want is not necessarily what Disney says they want. They don't necessaraily want random black people in shit. And the supply is WAY larger than demand.

          I mean look at this mindset:

          >black ppl are overrepresented in disney
          you can literally name all the black male disney characters on two fricking hands. you're trying to rationalize maintaining a woefully inequitable status quo that you've been indoctrinated to reinforce your entire existence. even minorities can feel this urge as we're inundated with the same media as you are, but we at least have the exp of knowing what it feels like to be excluded instead of constantly being pandered to.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >I disagree. Black people will absolutely spend money. Premium basketball shoes are proof. But the shit they want is not necessarily what Disney says they want. They don't necessaraily want random black people in shit. And the supply is WAY larger than demand.
            yes because they buy and enjoy stupid useless shit that they see as an increase in status. That's what they spend their money on.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >yes because they buy and enjoy stupid useless shit
              They buy Funkos? Strange, most of the people I see posting Funkos or $30 popcorn vessels are white Anons.
              >Sure, white people do dumb shit, but it's INFURIATING when black people do it!

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If you can't keep it to Cinemaphile, and jump at the dumbest bait, you belong in fricking pol.

                The key is, if people spend money on it, you get more of it. The aren't buying the new disney shit.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Disney has been pandering to white people for generations. Of course, there's going to be some bumps in the road when trying to broaden their appeal. And they've succeeded greatly in that regard but you consider it a failure because their strategies aren't always as successful as doing the basic rehashed bullshit that whites continue to eat up no matter how often they receive it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      he based. frick diversity of any kind. make shit that is fun and sells, let the blue hair freaks reeeee

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    lmao is this your king?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >did you just agree with someone? heh, worship him much? wanna suck his wiener or something? worship his wiener maybe? I think about wieners a lot

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Unironically you bc other anon never mentioned wieners, a rare self BTFO

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        True

        Unironically you bc other anon never mentioned wieners, a rare self BTFO

        Cope

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >See it isn't activism when we do it.
      The amount of projection here is through the roof.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [...]

      What? That particular angle just makes him look like Douglas's Hank Pym with slightly less hair, where are you getting Nazi from?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Pym's a frickin' commie.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [...]

      >omg based blackrock! Based soros! I love it when capital is used to force agendas on the 99%!
      >NOOOOOOOOO NOT LIKE THAT
      Lol, the only standard the left holds are double ones

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        i know,right?
        we should worship anti left billionaires
        oh wait that's all of them

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >all billionaires are anti left
          >Fidel Castro is anti left
          >Xi Jiping is anti left
          >Kim Jong un is anti left
          >Chavez is anti left
          huh? Even Bernie Sanders is a millionaire.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yes they are all anti left

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Two of those are long dead.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Depends what left means.
          If it means woke DEI gender/race obsessions then almost all billionaires are woke.
          If it means class consciousness and worker solidarity then none of them are.
          Now why is it that all leftist activists ever talk about is the former and not the latter? Pretty weird that the left has all the same beliefs and talking points as the billionaire class.. Unless..

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            anon liberals aren't leftists
            only libcucks talk about wokeshit and DEI shit

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              This is false. I see communists posting on Twitter all the time (hammer and sickle and everything) and the majority of the time they are talking about some intersectional identity politics issue. There seem to be some less woke tendencies but they are margibalized by other leftists.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I see communists posting on Twitter all the time
                thanks for proving me right

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >(hammer and sickle and everything)
                You cannot possibly be this easy to Troll, amiright?

                NTA, but I see it often that I thought it was normal. Some even having accounts on other places. I mean, if Nazis on socmedia are all real, why are commies harder to believe?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >if Nazis on socmedia are all real
                Its all mostly angry Larping lonely homosexuals. Nazis and Communists both. Just thirsty for (You)s or their equivalent for Heckin' Validation.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >(hammer and sickle and everything)
                You cannot possibly be this easy to Troll, amiright?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Where's the anime avatar Tweet? The one that says you're allowed to disagree about economics and still be a leftist, but you're no longer a leftist if you disagree with identity politics? Therefore identity politics is the core tenant of leftism.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You might as well claim that the core identity of the Right is fawning over a clearly delusional real-estate grifter.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not really. Unless you work for him, you can trash talk the orange man with little issue and still be transparently right-wing. If you go against idpol nonsense, you face a horde trying to make you unemployable.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Confound those known far-right conservative Christian billionaires, George Soros and Larry Fink!

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's like 2 out of a few thousand. Might as well throw Gates in there too for completion.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Larry Fink
            Environmental Conservation was a bedrock principle of Republicans from Teddy Roosevelt onward through Nixon, the GOP only became solely about distracting morons while they gave their earnings to billionaire shareholders relatively recently.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I hope he stuffs the woke Disney billionaires in a locker

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He better do it while they still have lunch money to steal.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      third post best post, election tourists need to stop sucking billionaire dick

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Samegay

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Guess Im woke now

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    well? Did they answer his questions?

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    very legitimate questions

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Even without any like moral judgement isn’t it just better planning to have stuff appealing to as many different demographics as possible? I know you’ll say the movies are bad and/or bombed but that’s a risk you take with any movie

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >isn’t it just better planning to have stuff appealing to as many different demographics as possible?
      yes but on the scale of the overall Disney IP things like Marvel are a "Boy Brand" that is meant to generate content for boys which was a demographic that Disney struggled to attract in the 2000s outside of franchises like Pirates of the Caribbean, Disney already had lots of "Girl Brands" at the time and needed to diversify away by getting IPs like Marvel and Star Wars.
      so it is more of a question of
      > "Why money is being wasted on this IP that doesn't get more traction from this brand's primary demographic?"
      don't really get he's hang-ups around Black Panther though

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >isn’t it just better planning to have stuff appealing to as many different demographics as possible?
      It's a reasonable approach, but it's not automatically better. More importantly, I challenge whether Disney's approach actually is appealing to many different demographics, as opposed to just a narrow number of leftist urbanites. Also, you can appeal to different demographics without having all black casts. Anime for example is overwhemingly made for the Japanese audience, and has relatively few black people, but actually does well with black americans.

      Black people are about 15 percent of the US population. They're actually significantly overrepresented. And that's not accounting for the fact that not all demographics are worth the same dollar value.

      Finally, there's the concept of "brand", which trying to appeal to everyone doesn't do. Disney absolutely has a brand, which it's been running full steam away from.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Anime for example is overwhemingly made for the Japanese audience, and has relatively few black people, but actually does well with black americans.
        So you mean specifically mainstream shounen shit?
        Which is known for appealing to as many different demographics as possible

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Um, anon, do you know what the word "shonen" means? Shonen anime is made for japanese children to young adolecents. It also gets criticized all the time for a lack of racial diversity in it's characters. So, where are you going with this?

          Has anyone mentioned that Nelson Peltz has a daughter, Nicola Peltz, who is a nepo baby actress?
          You know, the chick that that got cast as Katara in Shyamalan's The Last Airbender?

          I think you're the first. You should go with cheesecake pics of her if you have them.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >where are you going with this?
            It appealing to as many different demographics as possible, not just japanese teenagers
            it's even been proven to try to appeal to the west with it's inclusion of non japanese characters and non japanese looking characters

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              This is absolutely fricking wrong. The literal concept of shonen isn't to fricking appeal to as many different demographics as possible. You know the other demographics? Shojo? Seinen? Otome? Josei?

              Black people don't need anime to have black people they just need it to not have white people.

              I think you're nuts, but that doesn't mean you're wrong. I'm going to thing about this. Possibly while drinking something over 100 proof.

              Wtf are you even referencing you absolute schizoid

              20 words or less

              I'm pretty sure it's not Cinemaphile whatever the frick it is.

              >There's no world for people who don't hate themselves.
              All that's being asked by Liberals is "stop hating other poors/races".
              It's purely a distraction tactic by the Friends of Billionaires in our government, in collusion with Big Corp. You bark at Black folks/gays/liberated/women/mexicans/queermos, they contentedly keep gaming the system and filling their pockets.
              You fellate your 2nd Amendment Rights, they keep unravelling all the Rights the 2nd was meant to protect. Your livelihood is being sabotaged while you bark at minorities.

              This has been done for AGES. And it always seems to work.

              Watch the latest anti racist CN promos.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Racism is a stupid hoodwink; always has been.
                It's basic Divide and Conquer, and transparently so.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >This is absolutely fricking wrong. The literal concept of shonen isn't to fricking appeal to as many different demographics as possible
                it wasn't meant to originally, but they are making it appeal to as many different people as possible
                it's literally like capeshit

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They are willing to sell shonen to other people, but that's not the metrics they're using when they decide what stays and what gets a TV series. They aren't going around asking black americans what they want when they do a character poll or art contest or comicet survey.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I think you're nuts, but that doesn't mean you're wrong. I'm going to thing about this. Possibly while drinking something over 100 proof.
                I was being reductive but essentially the reason that black people like shonen battle anime is because it's the spiritual successor to Chinese Kung Fu movies.

                Now, what you need to remember is that back in the 1970s, so it was the height if the civil rights era and non-white audiences were probably starving for movies that weren't showing how great Ronald Reagan types were.
                Lo and behold, Kung Fu movies start getting imported straight from Hong Kong and largely relegated to inner city theaters frequented by immigrants and poor blacks.
                So they're introduced to this genre with non-white heroes going on revenge quests at a time when it speaks to them culturally.
                Combined with the fact that some of them were casting black celebrities (Kareem Abdul Jabar and Jim Kelly were in Bruce Lee movies), this ended up creating a secondary demographic. This gets paid forward and martial arts stuff gets incorporated into Blaxpolitation movies and the cultura as a whole. It's why Wu Tang Clan has that name, why you see parody characters like Black Dynamite practicing Chinese martial arts, or movies like The Last Dragon.

                There's a lot more to it but the tl;dr is that enough white people didn't want all that flippy dippy chinese shit in their theaters in the 70s that blacks got it instead, and ended up embracing it. 20-30 years later they see a cartoon that's like that and it gets added to the zeitgeist.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Keep in mind that a major theme of the Olde Kung Fu movies were an oppressed underclass fighting a rebellion against the rulers.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >tl;dr is that enough white people didn't want all that flippy dippy chinese shit in their theaters in the 70s that blacks got it instead, and ended up embracing it. 20-30 years later they see a cartoon that's like that and it gets added to the zeitgeist.
                But then why do white people like anime? I think it's just because it's good.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >black ppl only like [insert thing] bc white ppl aren't in it
                Never has this been the case. Stop projecting your supremacist dogmas onto nonwhite ppl especially blacks. Martial arts appeals to all people including black people who wouldn't forgo that expose or experience as the typical white supremacist would and all those unwittingly practicing white supremacy or supremacy ideas.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Anime has few white people too though.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          ...and yet does quite well with white people. I'm not seeing the point you're going for here.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Black people don't need anime to have black people they just need it to not have white people.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >black ppl are overrepresented in disney
        you can literally name all the black male disney characters on two fricking hands. you're trying to rationalize maintaining a woefully inequitable status quo that you've been indoctrinated to reinforce your entire existence. even minorities can feel this urge as we're inundated with the same media as you are, but we at least have the exp of knowing what it feels like to be excluded instead of constantly being pandered to.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          There's way more black women than black men in Disney media, like 2 to 1.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >There's way more black women than black men in Disney media, like 2 to 1.
            Wow, so much more; instead of two hands just to count the black male characters, now you need 6 hands to include black females. I wonder how many hands you would need to count all the white characters.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If it wasn't for Marvel's induction into Disney, then Disney's black male characters would be less than a handful half of which would be villains. Disney aggressively excludes black men.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The first academy award presented to a black male actor was for a Disney film, but you're not allowed to even see it anymore because white lefty-homosexuals decided he was the wrong sort of black.

          Go frick yourself you disingenuous communist c**t.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            There’s plenty of bootlegs and clips of it readily available online. Disney just doesn’t want to release it officially because they know it’s bad PR and hurts their bottom line. It’s pure capitalism but like always reactionary fricktards like can’t do anything except screech about how the blame is communism

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Go frick yourself you disingenuous communist c**t.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >but that’s a risk you take with any movie
      False, horror movies are always profitable.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Director wants to have an all-black cast for their film, or an all-female-led film
    >Disney respects the creatives' vision
    >Cinemaphile will pretend this is terrible

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm not investing in your guaranteed loss, 'creative'. Enjoy funding your wokeshit independently.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      These movies are garbage and there is no creative vision for them. they're slop made for the masses to slop up.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >"Director wants"
      >"Disney respects creative vision"
      >at Marvel Studios

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        LOL, think of the directors who dropped off a project because Kevin homosexual is more concerned for making commercials for the next movie and not letting creatives tell their stories.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      wants

      what director? this slop is made by committee

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Disney's on record for turning down family sitcoms because everyone involved is white. They only respect a "creative's vision" when it agrees with their own. It's genuinely hard to believe the horde of brown/blackwashing they've done over the last few years came organically rather than being by corporate request.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Disney's on record for turning down family sitcoms because everyone involved is white

        truly the end of the world. won't someone think of the sitcoms!

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Except it isn't just sitcoms. You have a Snow White who is not exactly pale. You have a Percy Jackson show where the leads, all visualized as being white in the source material, now include a black girl and an Indian boy. You have an Ariel so unrecognizable most would probably think it was cosplay. Disney does not behave like this when it comes to all of their properties. That live-action Lilo & Stitch movie had casting calls requiring people auditioning be AAPI.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Except it isn't just sitcoms. You have a Snow White who is not exactly pale.
            This is like the 5th or 6th Snow White adaptation, even Hemsworth has been in one.
            They should make one with CGI animals next.
            They are letting black actors/actresses helm stale old franchises for easy points.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >This is like the 5th or 6th Snow White adaptation, even Hemsworth has been in one

              This is Disney's first proper live-action Snow White adaptation (OUAT is its own weird thing). The root fairy tale is public domain, so anyone could make their own version (like, the Daily Wire). However, no other movie could not draw direct inspiration from Disney's. Same situation with The Little Mermaid.

              A better response would be that it's likely not going to do well and will get memory holed like most of their live-action remakes as merch based on the original continue unabated.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >That live-action Lilo & Stitch movie had casting calls requiring people auditioning be AAPI.
            >casting calls for a movie set in Hawaii requires cast and extras be Hawaiian

            What's the outrage here, exactly?

            >You have a Percy Jackson show where the leads, all visualized as being white in the source material, now include a black girl and an Indian boy.

            And the author of the books made that call. Take it up with him.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Riordan was pressured

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What's your source?

                >you made it the frick up

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nah Riordan went fricking insanely hard left early into the Roman books and it really fricking shows, especially by the time of the Norse/Apollo books. His writing quality tanked around the same time. I honestly think he might have gotten brain damage somehow, his plots go from decently well paced and focused enough to make use of it and give everything enough pages, mostly, to being a meandering mess full of plot holes ["Percy and Poseidon could have solved this plot in 1 Father-Son road trip" being a big one for the Roman set] where you end up with shit like the Big Bad of a series appearing after 7 fricking books and being defeated inside of 2 pages by the nonsense mindcontrol power of one of the secondary characters that suddenly is on steroids. Or the entire mess with Calypso.

                Then you got into shit like the Loki kid and the muslim valkyrie and homosexualry like that in the Norse set or "Poor Woobie gay ass babies Apollo. It's so charming and sad. By the way forget that he once cursed one of his children to be bait for a murderous child eating monster pit and be forced to watch as people were killed and eaten because he used his powers to help people."

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Disney wants all the extras to be Hawaiian? That kind of goes against both reality and the commentary in Lilo & Stitch. Lilo gets treated more like an attraction than a person by tourists because there are so few native Hawaiians remaining in Hawaii. It's now a lower-upper class paradise plus a bunch of homeless.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >that's not what our audience wants

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That line sure aged badly

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So what comedies does ABC have right now?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Brought to you by the people who unironically confirmed the existence of a gay agenda.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Not that I have anything against

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >white goyim worship israelite to spite other inferior beings
    Every time.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Gotta have plenty of white boys to die in their war with Iran. They're even trying to pull Sweden into it by doing falseflag shit where some Iranians were arrested for planning terror attacks on behalf of Iran.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [...]

      >GO DIE FOR ISRAEL AND I'LL GIVE YOU NON-WOKE CARTOONS
      Genius.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why the frick do these boomers care what disney does? are they just bored with their money?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're genetically unable to enjoy anything else than Disney.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >You can see her actively stop herself from twerking when she does the turn around
      >Her and Brie are actually pretty hot and even cute when allowed to be
      >You'd never know it from looking at their Marvel movies

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        these people are working, they won't twerk unless it's in the script.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Would.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      because he thinks that disney is wasting capital on relatively low potential woke shit, and could make an ASSLOAD more money with their previous, more restrained model, and thinks he can convince other investors that is the case.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You mean when they failed on the John Carter movie?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >a franchise no one cares about, to a point where they didn't even bother advertising it, failed to make money
          Wow. Who could possibly have seen that coming.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That movie just needed for Sola to be less clothed, and sexually aggressive towards John to the point of the competing with the somehow normal-caucasian-looking Thoris chick for John, and show off more of her haunches. She was looking kinda bangable, for a bug-woman.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          John Carter is really NOT what comes to mind when we say classic disney.

          Since when is a fricking Oppenheimer biopic a fricking tentpole?

          It is when Christopher Nolan directs it.

          I don't know TV shit, but the studio said it was in it's investor meetings, and I suspect the budget was tentpole class.

          [...]
          >especially with the whole Candance Owens daring to speak out.
          Context?

          Stupid pol bullshit, something something war in israel

          British, ergo Anglo, ergo Germanic, ergo basically black when you get down to it. They're the Congolese of Europe.

          >They're the Congolese of Europe.
          Hmmm. Who's the Bushmen of Europe?

          >women see it because it’s objectively a women’s movie
          >men see it because they dangle Ryan Goosling in front of them like jingling keys
          It couldn’t fail tbh

          They did more than just jingle keys. You had fricking MRAs supporting ken there. Like WTF.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Probably the southern latins/italians.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They more or less deliberately sabotaged that movie because they managed to get the Star Wars rights, didn't advertise it, and deliberately didn't use the more recognizable name, that's not really a fair comparison

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Almost like he wants more money

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Basically there are investors who are very aggressive with hostile takeovers when they see something strong but failing and use it to throw debt at them to pay off, fix it up to resell later, or to restore the company to be profitable and to focus on shareholders first.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        they also pay publications to write hit pieces to make the company they want to take over look weak to the investors.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's very aggressive, since they need to win over some people in the public, but most importantly the common investor who doesn't own a lot of stock, but is willing to give the aggressor power so bigger investors eventually do so as well.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They should do a Nextwave TV show.
      Use that to introduce Blue Marvel and lead into an Ultimates movie.
      Replace Black Panther with Reed Richards or someone.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >They should do a Nextwave TV show.
        This could have been fun, but I don't trust the MCU to do anything properly.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because they're like dragons with a hoard. It doesn't matter that he has more money than thousands of people will make in their lives. It doesn't matter that he lives in absolute, indolent luxury and never needs to do anything he absolutely doesnt want to again, nor do his descendants. It will never be enough. If he's not making more money than ever on every investment it's a bad investment and if his insane fortune isn't doubling every 7 (ideally 6 or less) years he's being screwed over. There's no interest in creativity or artistic expression or even just a desire for actually enjoyable media. Just a fricking dragon sitting on a hoard they'll never use and scheming about how to make it larger.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This post is a dragon's hoard of words.
        .

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          gottem

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Queen

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I try to be as objective as possible when watching these films especially on its creative vision w/o b***hing abt culture war bs. Just as a compelling work w/interesting visuals and characters, The Marvels is a good movie. Action sequences were well done, good story, etc, but the worst part that's becoming abundantly apparent are the budget cuts to the superhero outfits. Those things look like shit you could easily find online. There's a huge drop in quality and that's painful because I love that aspect of superhero films. Monica looks so cute in that image too, but damn, that suit looks like skin-tight, cosplay garbage. Damn.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I try to be as objective as possible when watching these films
        >Just as a compelling work w/interesting visuals and characters, The Marvels is a good movie.
        Delusional

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I'm convinced that people who hate The Marvels never bothered to give Ms Marvel tv series a chance, so they never completed it or never watched it entirely while expecting to enjoy a movie with that character so intricately woven into the story.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            A blockbuster movie shouldn't rely on people having watched a separate TV series that's paywalled behind a streaming service subscription for context

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >you shouldn't have to pay for content to enjoy content that you need to pay for

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If a movie isn't enjoyable in and of itself, then it's a failure. Sounds like they took one of the worst aspects of long-running comics and made it applicable to a blockbuster movie which is an utterly stupid thing to do given the difference in costs between the two. Limiting the audience to a $270 million movie is financial suicide.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                But the movie is enjoyable. The problem you say exists for The Marvels exists for all Marvel films after the release of over 30-something movies all linked in continuity with an overarching narrative, not to mention the tv series. I admit that it's likely a huge problem now and into the future for ppl simply wanting to watch and be entertained by a movie without knowing all backstories. But you must also understand that the experience will never be as fulfilling as those who have kept up with all the characters and storylines since the beginning.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I watched both the Ms Marvel and Vision and Scarlet Witch. The Marvels is bad because:
            1. The villain is a female retread of an incredibly boring villain who was reduced to being clowned on.
            2. They drag the entire cast of Ms Marvel into the movie, and KEEP them there, with nothing new to add to the story, til their schtick becomes super-tiresome.
            3. The whole CM's war on the Kree is reduced to a lame 1 minute flashback.
            4. The villain rationale and plot are incredibly stupid. Carol assassinates their AI Overlord (no backups?) so they Civil War and somehow wreck their own Sun. What? And that is Carol's fault? And opening gates to "suck" away the atmosphere/water/sun(!?!) of other planets is the stupid plot of Spaceballs, and scientifically Full moron.
            5. The forces arrayed against Carol are so weak she shouldn't even need help from the others, even with the inconsistent power crippling. She's just some b***h with a hammer in a space ship. Just fly through her ship (which is basically Carol's signature move) and she's finished.
            6. Instead everyone is fighting no-name Kree soldiers in desperate battles like they are superguys, except they never do anything remotely superhuman and even normal humans take them out.
            7. Absolutely no character's story is advanced in any interesting way, Monica, Carol, Kamala, they all just hang out, the first two get over themselves.
            8. The plot lines of the larger MCU are not affected or advanced in any way, I guess Nick Fury loses a space station.
            9. The Flerkin bit was funny the first few times, but was getting wore out in the original Captain Marvel, and they flog the hell out of it in the climax.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              wow, everything about this is wrong. I know because I watched the damn movie.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, I'm absolutely correct, I saw the movie opening weekend. Amuse me by citing anything I misrepresented.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      gross

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Peltz used to be friends with some of the people running Disney (like Iger), and he owns a frickload of stock. Unlike the anti-Disney autists in this thread, he has a steak in the grill

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why should a movie about an african country in Africa have a cast full of africans? Why not include a few token white characters?
    >Why yes, it was better when Frozen had an all white cast. It takes place in a white country, so it wouldn't make sense for black characters to appear there.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If you've ever actually been to modern Africa, anon, you'll find it doesn't survive without whites all over. Chinese, in some regions.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Fine, go there and become a king. Loser.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >virtue signal
          >doesn't go there xirself
          Mmhmm

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If you've ever been to modern Scandinavia you'll find people of non-white races everywhere - what the FRICK point do you think you're making?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why was Asgard full of non-whites?

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wasn't the Black Panther movies successful

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      first one since it was part of the avengers run. Second Once was a collapse.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        not the second one.
        and now their future is closed because they didn't prepare anything other than blackshit.

        >$250M budget
        >$860M box office
        >Not a success

        Cinemaphile keeps getting more and more delusional.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's Disney that sets the Success margin. Doesn't hit a billon then its a failure to them.

          other than that its longevity traction has been a flatline.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >>$250M budget
            And that's with all the "advertising" and "special effects budget" hollywood accounting they do.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >he thinks the marvel movies aren't hollywood accounted to hell and back with their inflated CGI budgets
              lol
              lmao

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >>$250M budget
          And that's with all the "advertising" and "special effects budget" hollywood accounting they do.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >What is advertising and reshoots.
          Do you at least get paid for all this shilling?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      not the second one.
      and now their future is closed because they didn't prepare anything other than blackshit.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        that and the magical Mexicans

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      shhh!

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So much so, that chuds pretended that it was all about how great ethnostates are, even though it was all about the opposite

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    but Black Panther isn't an all black cast, we have this guy as the friendly CIA glowie.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      British, ergo Anglo, ergo Germanic, ergo basically black when you get down to it. They're the Congolese of Europe.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He has a point, when the movie is actually good you can put all the leftist message you wantr and nobody minds.

    In the 90s if you told me a gay israelite made a movie about a scrawny white dude being a little b***h for half an hour before learning Nazis are gay morons and getting killed by a black man, a feminist told the extremely homoerotic story of a guy joining the surfer subchlture in Florida, some other gay dude made a film about incel terrorism, or two trannies made one about women and minorities fighting capitalism in a giant metaphor for transitioning I'd have rushed to see that shit. Now I'd just stay home and watch some guy on YouTube make fun of it because it's clearly not worth a movie ticket.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >and watch some guy on YouTube make fun of it
      you should consider suicide

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This.
        I don't need to watch some right wing pundit insult movies for a hour for being woke, it's the right wing version of left wing video essays about baby shows and their secret messages, the only litmus test I need to know a movie sucks is if the cast has a single woman or black man.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe in the past.

      I don't even watch movies where non-Whites have anything beyond a bit part. The moment I see one getting too much screen time in the trailer my mind instantly loses interest. There were movies I used to like which had non-Whites with significant parts and I can't enjoy them anymore.

      Same thing with a ton of stuff I used to tolerate. I'm proud of this and view it as form of self-improvement and spiritual enlightenment. Stuff like the OP is too little too late.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You've been conditioned into a head-case by social media. Now, I'll be the first to admit that Hollywood is absolutely pushing inclusivity too far; but that doesn't excuse you turning into a sociopathic moron: that's on you.
        >I'm seeking self-improvement and enlightenment--On Cinemaphile!

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What do you expect when there's no real alternatives? Every part of government would ratger he kll himself or lobotomise himself to become the perfect citizen that they deem worthy. There's no world for people who don't hate themselves.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >There's no world for people who don't hate themselves.
            All that's being asked by Liberals is "stop hating other poors/races".
            It's purely a distraction tactic by the Friends of Billionaires in our government, in collusion with Big Corp. You bark at Black folks/gays/liberated/women/mexicans/queermos, they contentedly keep gaming the system and filling their pockets.
            You fellate your 2nd Amendment Rights, they keep unravelling all the Rights the 2nd was meant to protect. Your livelihood is being sabotaged while you bark at minorities.

            This has been done for AGES. And it always seems to work.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Oh yes, and look how well companies like Sweet Baby Inc do such a good job at that.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Damn you a beta male now. Another sheep.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You remind me of the protagonist of Stephen King's Apt Pupil who finds it harder and harder to get it up for his israeli girlfriend the more of a nazi he becomes.
        He struggles to have a hard on when she's sucking him.
        You can't enjoy innocuous stuff anymore and you call that enlightment...

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >You remind me of the protagonist of Stephen King's Apt Pupil
          i pity you for remembering this awful slog and applying it to real life
          what's the next work of art you'll use, Berenstein Bears?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          NTA but it's pretty clearly not "innocuous" anymore is the thing and the problem, it's poisoned the well and now the trust and good faith is all gone.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wtf are you even referencing you absolute schizoid

      20 words or less

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        1. Falling Down (the image), 2. Point Break, 3. I don't know (incel terrorism?), 4. presumably The Matrix

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          1. Is American History X 3. Is falling down by reducing D-Fens down to a chud meme rather than a general everyman revolt in a world that doesn't care about anyone, to the point they literally have a scene where he finds a Black Man just like him who is ironically arrested for simply being a public disturbance while they can't seem to find him at all despite his rampage.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          1. Is American History X 3. Is falling down by reducing D-Fens down to a chud meme rather than a general everyman revolt in a world that doesn't care about anyone, to the point they literally have a scene where he finds a Black Man just like him who is ironically arrested for simply being a public disturbance while they can't seem to find him at all despite his rampage.

          Falling Down shits itself by making it so that the guy had a history of being crazy, rather than just snapping one day.

          They Live is a much better criticism. And kinda redpilled...

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The first one ("a scrawny white dude being a little b***h for half an hour before learning Nazis are gay morons and getting killed by a black man") is Falling Down and it's such a fricking good movie that Iron Maiden made a song about it. I whole heartedly recommend watching it.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Falling down is a really good movie about the death of the American Dream. It was made at a time when the soviets died, and it caused a bit stagnation in society where the average person started feeling the effects of it, as most people had nowhere else to blame for problems than where they lived.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >He has a point, when the movie is actually good you can put all the leftist message you wantr and nobody minds.
      Problem is cultists only care about the message, at the expense of the quality of the product. Woke shit is shit for the same reason Christian movies and cartoons are shit. Message is more important than entertainment.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >He specifically took issue with "The Marvels" and "Black Panther."
    Criticizing The Marvels is one thing. But Black Panther made Disney $1.2 billion, not counting spinoff merch, so they must have done something right. So either Peltz doesn't know what he's talking about or he's got an agenda other than profitability in mind.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >he's got an agenda
      Naaaah.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      moron

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >But Black Panther made Disney $1.2 billion, not counting spinoff merch
      >DURRRRRRRRRR
      >DAT MEANT MARBEL GOT TO KEEPS 100% OF DA BOX OFFICE TAKE DURRRRRRRR
      Imagine claiming someone else doesn't know what they're talking about when YOU don't know what you're talking about! Fricking moron. You dumb children just grab whatever number you can find and act like you're a fricking expert. Hey dipshit, there was also the scandals of Disney buying out tickets and shows for both Captain Marvel and Black Panther, and we see how BOTH flopped hard on their sequels. I'd go with Peltz over a moron like you any day you dumb frick.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        so why wouldn't they just buy the tickets for the sequels if that's true?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They hate you because you tell the truth

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Well he's israeli, but that never stopped the Nazis before considering all the cryptos in the higher ups.

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dammit people, make up your minds.
    Is this an anti-woke thread, or an anti-israelite thread?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's always been the same thing, anon.

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Iger is an evil, evil man. Ruined Eisner's reputation, set his hand-picked successor up for failure when he realized that the memedemic and his own terrible business decisions plus post-Endgame MCU dropoff was about to tank things, now trying to smear a guy who basically seems to going "make shit people actually want to see you dumb fricks" because he's desperate to maintain power even if it means sinking Disney. He'd rather be the king of Shit Mountain than have any kind of a real legacy because he's mostly convinced he can turn it around.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Ruined Eisner's reputation

      Eisner recently backed Iger similar to George Lucas as far as I see it. Both Eisner and Lucas are shit and hope they die off soon. That is the best thing both of them can do for the United States, die.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Iger does not want to turn anything around. Iger sold his Disney stock and is getting his extra bribes from investment firms like Blackrock, State Streets, and Vanguard. Iger is sacrificing all of Disney for the sake of Leftist Agenda or The Message.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He should have left by 2017, by that point TFA and Rouge One made bank AND people were ignorant of TLJ's devastating consequences to the Star Wars brand.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          But some homies gotta ice skate uphill.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He should have left by 2017, by that point TFA and Rouge One made bank AND people were ignorant of TLJ's devastating consequences to the Star Wars brand.

        all they care is 2030

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      he is also trying for a political career to add to his soullessness

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm almost sure we had some reasons to hate Eisner before having any idea how bad things would really be.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Eisner made his mistakes like anyone else but he's the guy responsible for revitalizing the animation industry in the 80s through the early 00s giving us that renaissance, so he's allowed to make them.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Wasn't he the one trying to get rid of 2D?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Ruined Eisner's reputation

      Eisner ruined his own reputation to the point where Walt's nephew lead a boardroom revolt to fire him.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    This is going to surprise you but despite what /misc/ says israelites aren't actually a monolithic hivemind.

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Frick off, grandpa.

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Peltz is no savior.

    That said I don't understand his motivation he is so old that legit he looks like he's going to die quite soon of old age. Even if he becomes the ruler of Disney won't be long until Death gets him. And Disney is doomed because they have ruined their reputation.

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    its starting to unravel with this whole war shit they played their hand and it turned to be a very bad hand

  23. 4 weeks ago
    DoctorGreen

    >Why can’t I have Marvels that are both?
    that's a good question. why is Marvel against Diversity?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because they just went through Captain America, Thor, Ant-Man, Iron Man, Dr Strange with full white leads??????

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No, you don’t understand. It’s diversity when you do black, blonde and red haired white people movies.

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He is pretty much spot on with the message vs quality story notion. I get that modern writers want to subvert the whole white hetero man being the hero but do they have to do it with such shit stories? Surely it is possible to write a good story with a diverse cast. All they have to do is stop trying to pass the mere instance of representation as sufficiently good storytelling by itself. All disney movies lately have either been "basic story but muh diversity" or "white hetero man needs to learn that he sucks and minorities rule".

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      which is ironic since its the minority's that suck

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Who the frick cares? Marvel(and DC) is GARBAGE, literally 100% of their awful universe is copied ideas from other creators, Hydra, Captain America, Avengers, X-men, Thanos, every single comic, team or character is just a cheap rip off of an actually good character or story from a respected author 99.99% of every writer they ever hired is a literal who hack. It does not matter if it was woke or conservative it would still be garbage and you would still be a garbage eater for reading it.

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Watch the trailer
    >the vague narration with brapping sound effects
    >See generic hollywood "strong woman" doing "strong woman thing"
    >Black person who sticks out as sore thumb with generic Killmonger haircut
    >trailer focuses on showing the cast of characters instead of shaping the idea of what movie is going to be about
    >hamfisted lines about good versus evil or of "making the difference"
    >based on some franchise that exists solely in name alone nowadays
    Yep, it's going to be shit. Not gonna watch it.

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >you cant have both because... BECAUSE YOU CANT, OK!?

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why do I have to have a Marvel that's all women?
    Mar-Vell is literally only known for dying of cancer and his main antagonist being Thanos. The MCU should have used the Infinity Saga to tell a complete story about Mar-Vell, and then have Carol ascend to the role of captain after he dies of cancer, which also leaves the Ms. Marvel position open to Kamala. It's that fricking simple.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's literally the original Marvel Graphic Novel. What a colossal fail.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not sure if I said it here before, but they could have done that in a single Captain Marvel movie, perfect Oscar bait. So brave and stunning.

      AND people would have gotten a more proper Captain Marvel movie out of it.

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Peltz

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >why an all-black Black Panther?
    there were plenty of whites and non blacks in the black panther movies
    wtf is this moron talking about?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He didn't see it. He read a PR release that was sucking itself off for having so many Africans on cast and he took that as an opportunity to say "Make male power fantasies for white men again." I mean, he's right. White straight single males of all ages are the most likely to seek superheroes and pay for the privilege.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Make male power fantasies for white men again
        why do people keep assuming these aren't still getting made today?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Because Catwoman was woke in the Batman.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Catwoman is absolutely the least of that shitty movie's problems.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Because they are doing bad re-makes of tawdry nostalgia-bait with extra-added Black folks, and Cinemaphile is mostly mid-IQ chuds (who think they are high intelligence) nostalgia-babbies.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          X told him that was the case.

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Has anyone mentioned that Nelson Peltz has a daughter, Nicola Peltz, who is a nepo baby actress?
    You know, the chick that that got cast as Katara in Shyamalan's The Last Airbender?

  32. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Did no one tell this jackass that the main cast of Black Panther were natives of a hidden city in the heart of Africa? And that there were white (and other races) in both Black Panther movies? He's being just as stupid as the clowns who made half of Asgard Black.

    And Ms. Marvel, Captain Marvel AND Spectrum have always been chicks, the mistake of that move was a super-dull villain, dumb stakes, and way, way too many television actors in the cast.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >And Ms. Marvel, Captain Marvel AND Spectrum have always been chicks

      Was there a law requiring Disney make a teamup movie featuring these characters? Modern Disney wouldn't make an all-male superhero team (pretty gay anyway), so it begs the question why they needed an all-female one.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Modern Disney wouldn't make an all-male superhero team
        Literally Spider-Man No Way Home.
        One supposes they were trying to capture some of that with "All the Captain Marvels", but it was a pretty weak effort with poor choices errywhere.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          NWH is a Sony movie, not a Disney one.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I agree but point of order, T'Challa literally has a white brother who's a die-hard Wakandan Nationalist. T'Chaka had him act as their lead diplomat and head the Wakandan Secret Police. Him and T'Challa's relationship is actually pretty important to the character.

      Him and T'Challa finally made up after a few fights and these days he backs rebel movements in other countries for the lolz in between slaying mountains of Wakandan chocolate pussy.

      What I'm saying is Black Panther actually has a really good reason to have specifically one white dude in it.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        White Wolf and Jakarra were not used in the film so that Killmonger’s role is more hyped up as a villain with familial ties to BP.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Be kinda based if Hunter just kinda fricking showed up one day like "Shuri my darling baby sister I was trapped in Subterranea foiling a plot by the mole people to infiltrate Wakanda. Half of them turned to dust and then reappeared. How are father and our brother-wait the frick you mean they're dead?"

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            In this scenario doesn't Hunter become king almost literally by default?

  33. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Except OG Black Panther did incredibly well, it's just that NOBODY, regardless of race, wants to see an action movie with a female lead.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >NOBODY, regardless of race, wants to see an action movie with a female lead.
      They have in the past. Aliens, Terminator 2, Tomb Raider, Kill Bill, Alita: Battle Angel, even the first Wonder Woman. They just have to appeal to men. The problem with garbage with Birds of Prey and The Marvels and Madame Web is that they're trying to make action films starring women specifically for women and hardly anyone wants to see those. They don't appeal to anyone except a handful of urban libs. The masses of women want to see stuff like Barbie, not capes.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Or, you know, sometimes movies just fail. Male projects flop all the time but weirdly you never see anyone say “nobody wants to watch movies about men anymore!” but the second the lead is a woman or non-white lead the failure is always put on the fact that it wasn’t a white male lead.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The only action film starring a woman for women that succeeded was Captain Marvel and that's because they deliberately sandwiched it between those two big Avengers films and said it was required viewing. Everything else has been a money loser. Men and women have their preferences and this attempt at social engineering is a failure.
          Peltz fuming about the Black Panther films is just outright prejudice though. I didn't care for the first one, but both of those made lots of money, so there's a market for it.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Black Widow did well considering the circumstances. And they had refused to do Black Widow movie for years until she was already shown to die in an Avengers movie, which you can argue helped to make her solo film less interesting to people.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            if buying your own tickets can be called success

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >They just have to appeal to men
        Winner winner, chicken dinner. Men and women's taste have not changed in decades. Men still want hyper violence and sex while women love drama and romance. Japan's media has that shit down pat.

  34. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >homie said that shonen tries to appeal to as many demographics as possible

    No lmao
    It tries to appeal to japanese kids and teenage boys, but plenty of people can take interest on it.

    There is even a manga explaining how Jump does it, with they sitting with mangakas and going "don't forget that our main goal is reaching young men, and if some girl along the way like what we are doing why would we change that?"

    Japan's commitment to appealing to different demographics is much better than western race to the botton.

    The people who like your property like it for what it is, trying to change it into something else to "widen appeal" isn't going to suddenly attract a giant swath of the audience that's not watching, it's just going to alienate the audience that IS.

    Imagine if a gacha game like that weird Twisted Wonderland Disney game suddenly stopped pushing male villain characters and instead only focused on Disney princesses, it'd die off overnight.
    Know your fricking audience, they're your audience for a reason.Disney bought Lucasfilm to appeal to the masculine audience and they immediatly changed everything about it to try to appeal to women.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it's so popular because it tries to appeal to as many people as possible to the point of publishing manga with a female protag

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >it's so popular because it tries to appeal to as many people as possible
        Incorrect, it's meant to appeal to japanese boys and other demographics just happen to like it as well. Just like how Marvel and Star Wars used to appeal to young boys and just happened to have female and adult audiences that also appreciated it.

        >to the point of publishing manga with a female protag
        There aren't a lot of shonen with female protagonists. Even shonen created by women still star young men (Demon Slayer, Fullmetal Alchemist, Reborn, Inuyasha, etc)

  35. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dragonball was made for young japanese boys. Its broad international appeal was not intentional.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And recent dragonball chapters have more blacks in it with afros and dread locks
      Japs aren't immune to this shit

  36. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    What the frick are you talking about, he looks like a typical big buisness israelite.

  37. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    swear to god If israelites started supporting Russia, Americans would be lining up to donate shit to Ukraine

  38. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Black Panther was really successful though. Shang Chi used a similar formula and was also really successful (if anything the criticisms in that movie surrounded Awkwafina who played the role of the Americanized 2'nd gen Chinese character). Imo the issue with The Marvels is Carol Danvers because she's literally a soldier/space cop character in an era where neither of those things are popular. I don't think replacing Carol with one of the more obscure male Captain Marvels would help at all.
    That dude is just a culture war boomer who doesn't actually understand these characters or the movies. Anyone who thinks Peltz actually reads comics is delusional.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Shang Chi used a similar formula and was also really successful

      No, it really wasn't. Go look up its numbers versus its budget. Realize that budget doesn't include the cost of advertising and Disney has to share that boxoffice gross with the theatres. There's a reason why they've been dragging their feet on doing a sequel. They know the MCU's ability to uplift Z-listers is over, capeshit sequels are in decline, while budgets continue to grow. Those aren't ripe conditions for a hit.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >No, it really wasn't.
        For a movie released during Covid it kind of was though. It obviously didn't come close to Black Panther's success, but it was released in 2021 and you have to take the circumstances of the time into account.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Venom 2 came out a few weeks later and grossed more on a lower budget and with worse reviews.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah nah that all seems like horseshit. Peltz is aware of the rapidly diminishing returns especially in a sense that we don't know since he's an actual insider. Also Carol is neither a soldier or a cop since her entire first movie which people apparently saw is her rebelling against being a cop and soldier to do the right thing to help refugees. It's all a cope.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Anyone who thinks Peltz actually reads comics is delusional.
      Maybe, but neither do the people currently making the movies.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      She’s just bland, they should’ve made CM secret invasion and made it a big crossover or paired her up with the Guardians.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The Marvels is Carol Danvers because she's literally a soldier/space cop character in an era where neither of those things are popular
      :I

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        :O

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Eww what's wrong with his eyes?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            WB's dogged pursuit of "realism".

  39. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Marvels makes sense. They made the original one female. The Black Panther comment is dumb unless he means Black Panther in FF.

  40. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Neither Black Panther nor The Marvels are 100% black or female. It's almost like he's seen neither movie. One predominately black movie and one predominately female movie do not outweigh the rest of Marvels catalogue that are predominately white and male. Nothing but absurdities exit these racists' mouths when they only whine abt a tiny fraction of movies that predominately minority or female but never the overwhelming majority of movies that are both white and male. It's obvious that ppl like Peltz hate any and all movies that don't prioritize his particular demographic even when that so seldomly occurs.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Isn't the intention is to phase out straight white men from anything in the long run?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No, that's a right wing conspiracy theory.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No. You'd have to be a completely brainwashed to even suppose that was ever the goal. I suppose that's simply projection from racist, misogynistic straight white men as phasing out other groups from mainstream media has been their goal in perpetuity.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It just seems like it to that demographic because that's what they did and try to do whenever possible.

          You have to be victims, because even in your wildest fantasies you could never succeed.
          Ungrateful monkeys.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Being monstrous, genocidal beings with the greatest weapons does not imply an inherent ability towards art or creation no matter how many ppl you kill, gatekeep, or force out of industries.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >implying implications
              Sure, when the brown horde takes over there will be peace and harmony.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It just seems like it to that demographic because that's what they did and try to do whenever possible.

  41. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why do I need an all Black cast?
    Black Panther takes place in the interior of Africa.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That rationale hasn't helped Thor.
      Black Panther shouldn't have included african american influence in Wakanda, or from the rest of Africa either, btw.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Black Panther had Everett Ross and Klaw.
        The sequel had Everett Ross, all of Atlantis and Contessa.
        It was never all black cast.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The CIA glowie was absolutely unnecessary. Klaw would have been essential, too bad he got done dirty.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ross is straight from Black Panther comics. He was used as the outside looking in. Which worked for the film.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Well my bad, there, then. I remembered some glowies discussing Wakanda in Who Is The Black Panther, but none that looked friendly enough, or in the rest of that run, neither in BP v2 or as far as I got in Jungle Fantasy.

              White Wolf and Jakarra were not used in the film so that Killmonger’s role is more hyped up as a villain with familial ties to BP.

              Would be better if they played Killmonger straight rather than do whatever the frick they decided to do.

  42. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >"Why do I have to have a Marvel that’s all women? Not that I have anything against women, but why do I have to do that?
    I've been begging for Nova to show up in the MCU for years now.

  43. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  44. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder how prior leadership decided instead of investment that increases capacity potential in their park or retain other entertainment and upkeep decided to funnel the hundreds of millions to alter their marquee attraction just to remove an IP that they can't even fully remove because Japan is keeping it, and only because 6,000 whites complained on a twitter-backed petitions for 2 days how offensive it is?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The real reason is they wanted to replace it with a newer IP that can sell more toys and the BLM witch hunts gave them the perfect excuse so that anybody who protested their favorite ride getting destroyed would get called a racist and silenced.

  45. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This motherfricker just ruined his chances with the dumbest quote of the year.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He's right but he said the quiet part out loud and you aren't supposed to do that

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, usually you have to be more subtle with these types of criticism like "diversity blah blah woke blah blah" instead of point-blank complaining that movies have too many women and/or blacks for your liking.

  46. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what the frick is this thread even about anymore? this homosexual is just another privileged dunce who thinks he knows better than people whose job is to make the stuff he uses to get money, he's David Zaslav.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >thinks he knows better than people whose job is to make the stuff he uses to get money,
      Disney went from dominating the box office to releasing multiple bombs, big budget movies that were supposed to be tent-poles. There's an obvious problem, he's just not articulate enough to explain it.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        sure, it's disney fault and not the dumbing down of the audiences, the absolutely demented push for a culture war or the fact a virus stopped the world for a few months
        it's because a gay character had 5 minutes of screentime in a disney movie.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          As if it wasn't Disney's fault for being part of the issue of culture being dumbed down in the first place.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            how did disney made people watch cinemasins?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >the dumbing down of the audiences
          Mass groups of people have always been dumb
          >absolutely demented push for a culture war
          The culture war existed before you were born and will exist after you die
          >the fact a virus stopped the world for a few months
          Covid and lockdowns and social distancing have not been a factor for years.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            you are not disproving anything. theatres have not recovered and the MCU is still a success. as with the Avengers movies all the stuff that has promoted itself as a giant crossover (NWH, MoM) is still making bank just like anything during the follow up to Infinity War except Ant-Man which did mid business as usual and disproving that Captain Marvel would've been a flop without the endgame hype, and I promise you that Deadpool vs Wolverine, the next big crossover event movie that people now only flock to, will do better than fine.

            >Minimal marketting for a Marvel Movie
            >No really big name actors
            >Rudd was in Civil War

            Of course it was boosted by the main movies. It was far better than the crap that got boosted up but it still got a leg up from the brand.

            and yet Captain Marvel did way better despite being an unknown newcomer, it can't be because it was the better movie, it's because disney bought the tickets or he critics or something...

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Why are you being disingenuous?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Captain Marvel did better than Ant-Man 2 despite both being sandwiched between the biggest Avengers movies
                >big event crossovers performing better than solo movies
                >Deadpool vs Wolverine is going to be stupidly successful
                where's the lie?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Deadpool vs Wolverine is going to be stupidly successful
                As long as you catch all the obscure references, of course.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >theatres have not recovered
              Top Gun, Avatar, Barbie, Mario, and Oppenheimer made tons of money. Get a new excuse.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                tentpoles make money, anything else?
                use the fricking godzilla movie if you want to debate.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                And yet Disney has had a lot of tentpoles flops these past two years.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm sure disney hates all the money spider-man & avatar sequels made for them.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >spider-man
                Who they share with Sony
                >avatar
                They inherited this from Fox.
                Their own films have been pretty bad this past year.
                >“Wish” joins a long list of its underperforming 2023 tentpoles, such as “The Marvels,” “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny,” “The Haunted Mansion,” and “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania.” This summer’s “The Little Mermaid” didn’t completely flounder with $569 million worldwide, but it’s nowhere near the billion-dollar threshold that Disney’s prior live-action adaptations (like “The Lion King” or “Beauty and the Beast”) surpassed with ease. And although “Elemental” finished with $495 million globally, much stronger than its disappointing opening weekend would have suggested, Pixar hasn’t restored its former glory after audiences were trained to watch on Disney+. (Disney is hoping that “Wish” has similar staying power during the busy holiday season.)

                >Disney’s only unmitigated success in 2023 has been “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3,” which opened in May and generated a healthy $845 million globally. And even then, analysts expected the epic conclusion to James Gunn’s trilogy about intergalactic misfits to get closer to $1 billion, or at least end the series on a high. (2017’s “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2” remains the highest-grossing entry with $863 million.) Without a runaway blockbuster in the bunch, it’s the first time since 2014 (except for the pandemic-stricken years of 2020 and 2021) that Disney hasn’t launched a billion-dollar release.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Since when is a fricking Oppenheimer biopic a fricking tentpole?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It is when Christopher Nolan directs it.

  47. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Captain Marvel was boosted by Endgame hype
    just like Ant-Man and the Wasp, right?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Minimal marketting for a Marvel Movie
      >No really big name actors
      >Rudd was in Civil War

      Of course it was boosted by the main movies. It was far better than the crap that got boosted up but it still got a leg up from the brand.

  48. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >thinks himself superior
    >is too fat and incompetent to do anything about that "problem"
    Some Caucasian you are, anon.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Scandinavia
      >Caucasus
      I don't live in either region and they're not my problem, dipshit.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >pls commit massmurder and terrorism
      Frick off glowBlack person.

  49. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    movies with women don't make money, said some moronic boomer

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This movie's entire concept was made to appeal to women. Action films don't appeal to women unless there's hot beefcake to look at. Women don't want to look at other women being badass.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >trust me bro, I know everything about women

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >women see it because it’s objectively a women’s movie
      >men see it because they dangle Ryan Goosling in front of them like jingling keys
      It couldn’t fail tbh

  50. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Disney has never made an "All Black" movie, but he should be happy to know they have made plenty of movies with nothing but white people.

  51. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's not a story unless Disney has more disappointments than an already disappointing company.

  52. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    "Why an all-black Black Panther?"*
    [*Editor's note: Black Panther was not an all-black movie.]

  53. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >man says perfectly reasonable normal things
    >KEEP HIM OUT
    Disney needs to die.

  54. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >especially with the whole Candance Owens daring to speak out.
    Context?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Black woman got fired from her job for criticizing Israel or some shit. Proving that blacks and women still haven't won the oppression olympics.

  55. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    While I’m sure a lot of us agree with his basic message, dude sounds like an out of touch moron echoing what his 13 year old grandsons are telling him. Black Panther is mostly African and Black- oh, shocker, but its cast was absolutely not 100% that and I think it shows how dumb this guy is. Black Panther had the fricking Hobbit AND Gollum in it!

  56. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]
    This is going to surprise you but despite what /misc/ says israelites aren't actually a monolithic hivemind.

    Goes to basically 100% if you include people married to israeli people.
    Sus as frick if 99%+ of your entire government is tied to a foreign nation in one way or another.

    https://i.imgur.com/KsGFjPA.jpg

    >March 22 (Reuters) - Walt Disney Co(DIS.N), opens new tabon Friday said that remarks by activist investor Nelson Peltz criticizing the company for making movies dominated by female and Black actors is evidence that he shouldn't be on Disney's board.

    >Peltz, whose fight to join Disney as a director has become one of the year's most bitter and closely watched board battles, in an interview with the Financial Times said Disney's films have become too focused on delivering a message, and not enough on quality storytelling. He specifically took issue with "The Marvels" and "Black Panther."

    >"Why do I have to have a Marvel that’s all women? Not that I have anything against women, but why do I have to do that?" Peltz said in the interview, published on Friday. "Why can’t I have Marvels that are both? Why do I need an all-Black cast?”

    >Asked about Peltz's remarks, a Disney spokesperson responded: "This is exactly why Nelson Peltz shouldn't be anywhere near a creatively driven company."

    >in an interview with the Financial Times said Disney's films have become too focused on delivering a message, and not enough on quality storytelling
    Love this line. Don't know anything about this guy, but it's a great line.
    Seems like over half the movies that come out these days sacrifice their writing a bit by trying to push some ideal or trying to "correct some wrong", it really does feel like they literally do not care about the movie itself when they do this, happens a lot in games, too.
    >hiring shit-tier D-list actors with a rap sheet solely because they're not white
    >making female characters never get truly injured in the movie while the men get blown to bits or beheaded
    >not firing shit-tier actors when they perform badly or when they abuse their spouse, solely because they're not white, while blacklisting bigger stars like Brendan Fraiser and Johnny Depp on thin accusations
    >including an LGBT kiss/sex scene despite knowing that's gonna get the movie banned in several major markets, then complaining about sales when it does
    >shitting out something like Cuties or those other dodgy Netflix movies and defending them tooth and nail for some reason
    >making "main character voiced/played by white dude gets one-upped/embarrassed and replaced by diverse, spunky female" sequels to most long-standing franchises every other year. Still mad about Cars 3

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >spoiler
      Oh yeah that was a thing?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah. Even worse was that she replaced Lightning mid-race. How the frick was that allowed?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yep.
        Cars 1:
        >never give up
        >even if you're down, you can always recover
        >never judge a book by its cover
        >sometimes the "old dog" still has some tricks left in him
        >learn from and respect your elders
        >PIT STOP

        Cars 2:
        ...a fun global romp spy thriller starring Mater for no reason?
        The movie's entertaining at least, though I never personally got into it.

        Cars 3:
        >give up
        >you can't be on top forever
        >pass the torch
        >step aside

        Didn't the Cars 3 thing also happen with Wreck-it Ralph and Toy Story around the same time too?
        I'm blanking on a few other movies, but I know it happened more than that.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yup, this Cars 3 plotline sounds like a LOT of Pixar/Disney/movies in general for a while.
          Went to a funeral early this week. Weird how many people seem to be taking this to heart.

  57. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    After Disney wasted an entire Doctor Strange sequel on "women who want babies are dangerous and evil" and opened their Secret Invasion show by fridging Maria Hill, and generally has a three year track record of treating their women characters like shit, I have trouble believing excessive wokeness is the problem.

    Especially since Black Panther, which is their preachiest franchise, is one of the few that hasn't blown itself to smithereens yet despite maybe having the worst luck in the entire company.

    There are some bad decisions that overlap a bit with wokeness, like deciding to give Sam his own Captain America movie before waiting to see if anyone liked him that way, but you can't really fit disasters like Thor 4 and Ant-Man 3 into Peltz's framework.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Black Panther, which is their preachiest franchise, is one of the few that hasn't blown itself to smithereens yet

      Anon...you're stretching

  58. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The giant nose, beedy eyes, and sloping forehead are major nazi identifiers
    Don't trust anyone with those ohysical characteristics

  59. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'll take a decade of movies only written by and starring black women if it means we can force israelites out of the media and into hard labor.

  60. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There's so much investment and application of power poured into making everything as wretched and disgusting to look at as possible.
    I just wish I could express my will upon existence and just command everyone to drop over dead. I'm done with all of this, I just want everyone gone so none of this happens again.

  61. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is a pretty moronic notion if the story being told revolves around those identities. You can't take the black out of Black Panther and call it Black Panther.
    >but he didn't mean ALL-
    This board always has the b***hing and moaning raised to the max if there's a shade of black seen for more than 5 seconds. Go ahead and say that anything above 0 is too much, but don't try to pretend you're being reasonable.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nice try, homosexual.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They can never be honest about their intentions, they always have to pretend they're being reasonable while sieg heiling every five seconds. And they do it out of compulsion, they enjoy lying to your face.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >words words words but no argument

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >you have no argument if I don't read it

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >not even trying to not sound like a moron

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >more inane babbling

  62. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I am the ultimate authority in what's good
    go back to your trashcast

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ironic.

  63. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    funny how boomer want to separate quality storytelling from delivering a message as if that's not what telling stories is about.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Boomers wrote the best stories, Gen Xers and Millennials are a definite downgrade.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This, the media is still trying to half-heartedly bank on the 80s' greatest hits.

  64. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >"Why do I have to have a Marvel that’s all women? Not that I have anything against women, but why do I have to do that?" Peltz said in the interview, published on Friday. "Why can’t I have Marvels that are both? Why do I need an all-Black cast?”

  65. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Disney has never made a movie with an all women cast or an all-Black cast so he has nothing to worry about

  66. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Another thing worth mentioning about old movies starring women being successful is most men had yet to be BURNED by Feminism Shit in their lives.
    The movie would be so different that it be unrecognizable. Ridley likely wouldn't get her shit pushed in as much.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well the chick in Prometheus got screwed over horribly in every way, but that was like a decade ago.

  67. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He has a good point.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *