why did He do it??
Post that scene
>incels get off to this
Almost every romance novelist has written this scene for women to schlick to
i will save and protect her 🙂
Mommy! was a good film
For me it's the undisputable fact that she (as character) never in the whole movie gets shoes. JL 1st, MEW 2nd.
It’s a bean flicker bro
>kink shaming in 2023
Why do you care what trans women watch chud?
a girl I met online who I liked liked to come off as some shy 6/10 girl or whatever, but I ended up finding her Motherless account months after we stopped talking and it was full of rape and gangbang porn. Why are women like this?
All women love that. I dont know if you've learned this, but women are bigger coomers than men. Shy girls are just like shy incel males, all that time being introverted leads them to wild fap sessions
It's true. Everybody gets horny. But it's more difficult for women to get off.
anon WOMEN get off to this
only ones with a clue
what do you mean by that?
What the fuck is this?
Wait till you see the baby scene
Nice scream from JLaw
No, they skipped the microwaving part.
To shreds, they say
Why did he do it bros?
FOR BEST RESULTS: MICROWAVE
>The most productive American
I can't believe Ezra personally demanded this scene
what was this a reference to?
israelites don't sacrifice babies, retard
>meanwhile, in Palestine, the israelites are murdering babies by the hundreds to drench the foundations for their Third (final, diabolical) Temple
it's called CINEMA chump
She's Mother Nature
Caesar there is God
Extinction Rebellion porn
>Noooo, when you criticize my le huffe du farte movie you are beating my beautiful MUSE like the mangy dog!!!
Standard artfag director seethe that "YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!!".
Remember that scene in Lady in the Water where the film critic gets ripped the shred by the grasswolf? It's a whole movie of that scene, but where instead the critic beats the shit out of BDH.
Cos he's good
Shit I mean God
Forget "artistic license", this shit is just evil. An entire team of people pitched, wrote, and created a scene - in graphic detail - of a baby being torn apart. And they had to show it, of course they did. Very important. Have the baby pee to show how terrified it is. Excellent!
Imagine doing this with the life you have. The life and talents that God gave you. Evil fuckers. Only movie I've ever turned off in disgust.
You forgot the eating of Christ
Kek I never watched it
Seems my instinct are correct
I want my baby back, baby back, baby back, baby back, baby back, baby back, baby back, baby back riiiiibs
Chilliii baby back ribs
Hannibal would be embarrassed.
This ruined his career
Go clutch pearls somewhere else
>I ATE A BABY
The symbolism of a brown hoard mutilating a white baby in the home is palpable
it's just a movie homosexual
Meh. People do more fucked up things in real life.
zoomers taking shit they see in movies as real and thinking the people who do that actually do it in real life will never not be funny. Bro writers of old wrote about licking ass and eating shit and that shit probably happened unlike movies, yet people still worship them. Stick to Tom & Jerry
israelites are an evil, dark race.
Show the baby eating
It's on YouTube. It's not some live leak lost footage
>mixing mother earth crap into pseudo biblical narrative
>pseudo biblical narrative featuring the most surface level elements
>the house-burning is symbolic for climate change
>the house-burning is symbolic for climate change
What? No it isn't. Its symbolic for starting afresh. Flood the earth and do it again
>oil tank in the basement
>mother earth start the fire after being abused
cmon on now
>No true Christian could ever love nature
You people are psychotic at this point. I don't even think you know anything about what original Christians even were
it's just a bad movie with an incoherent message. It's the most surface level r/atheism take possible.
>bro religion causes war and humans destroy earth
it's convoluted in mixing the two too. Jesus was not the son of Gaia. The "eaters" of christ aren't the ones who killed him.
The allusion i don't get is God & mother nature's babby being jesus
And Mother Nature keeping Him away from the little babby Jesus?
I thought Jesus was Mary's child, God's child, but am I missing some more symbolism
don't feel dumb for not understanding a dumb movie.
Distilling the film down to just the biblical metaphors is pretty surface level itself.
its whats cringe about it , not a summary
The film is incredibly on the nose with its biblical metaphors thoughbeit
Right and most just stop right there and think that's all there is too it.
The film drags a lot if you don't realize it's a biblical allegory quickly. Subtlety would've made it a snorefest.
He didn't respect her. He loved her but treated everyone else better even if it broke her down and destroyed her from the inside out. He took her for granted and didn't care if his actions caused her pain. And for what? To please others? To get a fraction of the love she also gave but he was too blind to see? He's a fuckin cunt and deserves to get burned at the stake.
This. Who would want the worship of humanity? Have you SEEN what humanity is like?
Apparently God's super impressed with human potential. But we keep fucking up.
After 2000 years I would assume my hopelessly degenerating drug addict children were just never going to live up to their potential
And all this shit is tolerated and allowed to go on so every hundred years or so a handful of us achieve cool shit.
>Go to the moon
>peer out into the cosmos.
It's all insignificant compared to the majesty of the rest of creation. The inner workings of the sun, cosmic rays, singularities, everything
It's not insignificant if you value human endeavor. We do things independently, on our own. What we achieve by discipline and reason is our own. That makes humanity unique. It makes us interesting and unpredictable. I imagine it would be very entertaining to an omnipotent being.
He also laughs manically about being able to do it all over again with a new Mother Earth. I guess the takeaway is God is a dick and Mother Nature is his most mistreated creation? We are parasites on it
God and mother nature?
basically god fucks mother nature then gets bored and uninspired until the first of humanity cause a rustle that makes mother nature angry so god gets horny and has passionate creation sex with mother nature who then gets pregnant and this inspires god to create more and he finishes his masterpiece and humanity worships him and his work and invade the home which is earth which he welcomes and they then begin to destroy the earth and take it for granted as they party and destroy it and mother nature complains and creates natural disasters in pain but it does not matter and finally mother nature goes into labour and gives birth to christ and does not let god near him as she does not believe that god cares about her or the baby anymore but God just watches her and when she sleeps he takes the baby and gives it to the masses of humanity to share his love his creation and they share and pass him around against his will in worship and abuse him and abuse him until they've killed him then they weep in sorrow and partake in the eating of the body of christ and mother nature finds this abhorrent and despicable and in pain she unleashes her wrath against humanity until god tries to stop her and say we should forgive them but mother nature says no enough is enough and lights the flame to end it all and then mother nature burned and scarred but still somewhat living speaks to God and God says he needs her core to try it again and she gives it to him because she still loves him and wishes she was enough for him
ya'all going to hell
I'll be in good company
You have a lot of things wrong, I don't even know where to begin
well begin then please and forgive my ignorance
Start with the First Council of Nicaea
I ain't reading all that
It's more about Gaia vs Abrahamic religions. Think of fatherhood and motherhood as cosmic forces and the bible being one account on what happened from a monotheistic perspective.
>It's more about Gaia vs Abrahamic religions. Think of fatherhood and motherhood as cosmic forces and the bible being one account on what happened from a monotheistic perspective.
This makes more sense to me
So make sense of the Father/Artist just replacing the Mother with a new woman?
Metaphor for moving to a new planet?
Its a hodge podge of common beliefs + Aronofsky's mother complex, there's no Mother Earth in Christianity.
Mother! Is like doing an absolute asinine operation for an equation and getting the actual correct result. It's liek Aronofsky is best when he goes apeshit mode because thats the only way hos contrived torture shit works
So the whole movies basically about man treating mother earth like shit while god watches or some shit, right?
Came across to me more like God welcoming it and just knowing he can start anew with a new Mother every time shit doesn't work out. God is more obsessed with playing with his little children (us) than he is for the planet he puts them on
We only have one earth, and no planet out there is able to sustain life like this one does. So this whole things really about the destruction of "nature" and the constant disrespect and wear that we cause on this earth by living on it? So Jennifers character's "Mother earth", so, the beating webm makes sense.
The problem is that we're still animals who spent our entire existence as a species trying to survive off what meager resources Nature would provide. Now that we literally control all resources and basically own earth, we're in competition with our own nature.
>I establish my covenant with you: Never again will all life be cut off by the waters of a flood; never again will there be a flood to destroy the earth
big brain couldn't be bothered to read 9 chapters
But then that happens tho
its about climate change
It barely is about climate change just because of the oil part at the end
Its so on the nose of what its about i don't know how you can even try to make alternate interpretations about this film
Who is Aronofsky fucking now? It was Weisz with The Fountain, JL for Mother! Which whore is his next muse?
The funny thing about this and
is that he actually pushed his squeeze, jennifer lawrence, to breaking point during this film. She got a real injury or 2 apparently, which is interesting if you view Him in the film as an artist or director..
>Darren Aronofsky Found Jennifer Lawrence's Reality TV Obsession "Disappointing"
>Particularly, her choice of 'Keeping Up with the Kardashians.'
A much-deserved beating then.
Sophie sadie or whatever her name was
No way. Zoomer whores would be going batshit over the age gap and they'd cancel Sink.
Id close that gap if you know what i mean
>religion is... le BAD
anorofsky at it again with garbage can fire of a movie
The first half of this movie is genuinely hilarious
I watched this movie with my younger cousin who didn't pick up on any of the religious motif whatsoever,
not even some clockings on of a character called Mother who acts with no agency
not even the baby
not even the house
Just not a clue. Zoomers can't do it
Every child born after 2001 is doomed. They have no idea how little they know about the richness of world history and philosophy, and they think YouTube personalities are deep.
It really is sad. I'm 39 and I train a lot of young people at my job. I always ask them about what they're learning about in school and if they have any interest in furthering their education. They don't care. They just want to watch bullshit on their phones. Sometimes I try to teach them something about literature or history and they seldom show any interest. Feels bad man.
what classics and histories do you recommend
It depends on what you've read and how much education you have. Everybody's different.
So you honestly think it was any different when you were 20.
Also what job are you in. If you're working some minimum wage drop out magnet you're going to meet the types who don't give a shit about anything.
Man. Shut the fuck up. Nobody gives a shit about what kind of literature you're into, it comes across as try hard and desperate, I'm a Cinemaphilefag too but I only discuss my books with people are are perceptive to literature in the first place and love books themselves.
It's normal to not pickup on subtext on the first watch when you're that age anon. When I was 20 I would rewatch a movie because I know there were parts I missed due to the shock and awe on screen. I'm older now and pick it up on the first watch. Don't presume that he can't get it just because he didn't immediately see it from watching such an ugly movie. Hell you could have explained it.
Listen ill give (her) the benefit of the doubt if we were watching some auteur kino and she missed the subtext but come on lad you can't miss it here. Id barely call it subtext in the film
I mean sometimes a movie is so hamfisted with the "metaphor" thinking it's sooooo fucking clever when it's so low effort.
Times like that it's better to just see shit literally. A crowd knocked the fuck out of a lady and a baby got dismembered? Sounds crazy.
Also I have met girls who were retarded and couldn't understand the satire in American Psycho, getting upset at the parts when the men were talking about how useless women are. I get it, it's annoying listening to someone who's not using their brain
>not even some clockings on of a character called Mother who acts with no agency
>not even the baby
>not even the house
zoomer here, this doesn't ring any bells
you're either making shit up or you're some religious nutjob schizo who sees parallels in everything
Not him, but can you not see Old Testiment parallels inside the film?
I didn't watch the film
It's sometimes necessary to watch a film to understand it.
I don't think that's true
True if big
this is one of the worst danzig adaptations I've ever seen
This is the heart of a Christian message:
>a mother willingly brings her child to life in the world, knowing that one day her child will suffer and die, but through that suffering the world will be redeemed.
It is a message of hope, and affirmation of life and the worthiness of life in spite of suffering, and even the creation of meaning through suffering.
Anyone who is not a mental midget will see similar themes to this in this film, but it also strays in many respects. She never seems to be willingly giving her son up to his fate in this movie, so it lacks the redemptive meaning, and only amounts to tragedy, and ends with the Mother burning down the house.
There is also the allegory of the Man/Artist and his obsession with his work/the baby, which was only half his, half the Mother's. He is the one who seems to be willingly giving up his child to sacrifice, for the praise of others, not the Mother. And then after all the Mother's suffering, the Artist just replaces her with a new model. (plus Aronofsky was banging Lawrence, so it's even more potent).
Overall, my take is that it is a very dreadful message for Mothers and actually the inverse to the archetype of Madona and her child, Christ. Her child is taken from her unwillingly and she becomes vengeful, instead of accepting of inevitable death/suffering.
I haven't seen it in years though, so I might be misremembering. I remember thinking the opposite after the film, but over time to consider, I think my current take is correct.
That sounds about right. In terms of it being a terrible message for Mothers and Aronofsky, you can add Him laughs away happily at the end about being able to start afresh with a new model. I would have expected God to be more ambivalent
It all sounds like a shovelful of israeli filth to me.
I saw this movie with my dad. We always reference it to each other whenever we're in a large crowded place.
Harv made her to do it.
ok but the movie was pretty fucking kino simply because of its originality and uniqueness. I remember RLM shitting hard on it because they thought the metaphor was too obvious but i didn't mind. And she was great in it
Aronofsky is a coomer in denial.
why are you all such weird and disgusting incels?
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save name for the next time I post.