Why did they care if the yogurt was "non-fat" anyway? Didn't they realize that weight gain vs weight loss is all about calorie intake vs calorie burn? Not whether a food has "fat" in it or not? Were all people in the 90s so retarded?
Why did they care if the yogurt was "non-fat" anyway?
there are fatties on this very board who think calories from cookies affect bodyweight more than calories from salad.
Even if they do, literally just eat less calories, and if you're still not losing weight, eat less calories than that!
What is glycemic index of carbohydrates?
What’s the difference between good and bad fat?
I agree with what you’re saying but the statement is false.
No-one on this board is getting fat from eating salad unless they're putting a gallon of dressing on it.
You'd be vomiting up salad before you consumed enough to match the calories from a cookie.
you're a retarded fucking homosexual. Even a big salad, with light dressing can easily equate the same calories as a goddamn cookie you fat fucking homosexual
>even a big
So you admit it would be big enough to make you puke if you tried to eat it all in one sitting.
>DUDE JUST STARVE TO DEATH LMAO
Great advice! Retard
>2 plates of leafy greens
>200 calories
Meanwhile you can get that from 2 oreos. You feel more full after the salads. It's literally all just calories in calories out pit the fork down Hammy.
I drink at least 2 1.5-liter bottles of Coke each day and Google says that's 1,260 calories. I decided to not google how many calories is in the half-gallon of ice cream that I eat every day.
90s advertising and food products was full of "non-fat"/"Lo-fat" nonsense, all designed to keep fatties slurping down garbage while having them feel good about themselves.
This. It was when all the low fat and non-fat marketing started. Adhering to this type of diet throws your hormones out of whack and we're seeing the adverse effects it's had on people today.
Fat was the carbohydrates of the 90s
Non-fat is less calorie dense so you can eat more of it.
not always
Yes always if the only difference is the fat content
And this is precisely the reason there are so many fat people. They eat low- or non-fat, and assume that means they can stuff themselves.
I once ordered diet coke for myself but ordered the large size and ordered two both for myself. The girl taking my order laughed.
That's not what I said you absolute fucking mongoloid. Go neck yourself
>nonfat yogurt
>always plenty of nut toppings to pick from
It's 12am and the pizza place closes in 2 hours.
I am thinking of getting some XL pizzas.
y/n
some things to consider:
- if I get pizza now, I won't have to leave the house for the next few days
Dubs says you get 4 extra large pizzas with double pineapple and double capers
Almost trips kek
Now check these dubs
>2 off from double dubs
Roll for dubs
Looks like it's an empty tummy
I didn't go and now I regret it.
Shame because I just got dubs
If I get dubs, FUCK YOU
The sugary industry conned everyone into blaming saturated fat for health issues, nutrition science history is rich in nonsense.
In American grocery stores the vast majority of yogurt brands will lower the fat, and yet add sugar. Which yes is completely retarded and has been discredited for a long time. The dairy industry might benefit from this too, like they do with skim milk (they split whole milk into two different products which can be sold for more money). Take out the fat, sell it somewhere else, sell inferior reduce fat products to misinformed consumers just operating on habit. Skim milk is less healthy and less tasty, tons of people still buy it.
First time I tried fatty yogurt I was shocked at how much better it tasted than the low fat shit.
>there are fatties on this very board who think calories from cookies affect bodyweight more than calories from salad.
Calories are literally calculated by incinerating food in a calorimeter. Do you think this is how humans digest food? Different foods with different macronutrient and micronutrient profiles are metabolized differently and have different hormonal effects, such as those which affect satiety. If two people are trying to lose weight, both eat the same number of calories, but one feels calm and satiated while the other is having a sugar crash and feels like they are starving, who do you think will be more successful at losing weight? Why is this so hard for you fat retards to understand?
That doesn't change the fact from the other anon that calories are calories, pure and simple.
>a tautology
wow, thanks a lot retard!
Just wait until you learn about the Thighmaster.
most normies practice "intuitive eating" ie if something satiates them they're done with it.
non-fat messes with that perception since their stomach can perceive reaching satiation faster but their mind says they should be able to eat more.
this becomes more and more of a problem with processed foods that under-report their calories/fats.
it's a legit discussion you can't have anymore coz the "let people enjoy themselves!" schizos pour out of the cracks in the walls everytime you say anything about it.
So CICO is the way to go.
>Were all people in the 90s so retarded?
Yes. Despite how it seems when browsing this place, the internet has made the average person vastly more knowledgeable.
Before widespread Internet, there was no way to look up the health information for restaurant chains and such. You basically had to rely on the information that the chain provided. And of course they all lied and said their shit was healthy and low-calorie. E
Every stupid zoomer question about the past can usually be answered with "There was no fucking Internet." I know you fucking zygotes can't conceive of a time before smart phones and Google, but it existed.
>Before widespread Internet, there was no way to look up the health information for restaurant chains and such. You basically had to rely on the information that the chain provided. And of course they all lied and said their shit was healthy and low-calorie.
This. In high school all the chads drank Miller Lite. I thought it was weak, but there was no alcohol content on the can or packaging. With no Internet, I had to literally call the 1-800 number on the twelver box and talk to customer service. It took like 20 minutes and being transferred to several different people before a lady begrudgingly admitted that the alcohol content was 3.5%. Which probably means it was 3.0%. Literal piss water. No wonder we could drink 20 of them in a few hours.
>Lite
why’d you waste your time when the answer is in the name
Man Seinfeld sucked.
in the 90's fat was bad, but it was really sugar that was the culprit. Remember Snackwells?
In the 90s there was legitimate fear-mongering over fat. I guess similar to how carbs then sugar were subsequently vilified despite people consuming all three in the past without becoming landwhales.
There was no internet. Less people were fat back then anyway. It’s just your generation that’s obese,autistic and are huge homosexuals .
that boy is icsh
Salads taste best when you mix in pineapple cubes.