Why didn't Harry use the Resurrection stone to revive the students and teachers who died just the previous day in the hands of Voldemort's army instead of just throwing It away?
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Why didn't Harry use the Resurrection stone to revive the students and teachers who died just the previous day in the hands of Voldemort's a...
women can't write
It doesn't fricking work you idiot.
Why didn't Hermoine use the time turner to prevent Harry from touching the portkey in Goblet of Fire?
Or just use the time turner to kill Tom Riddle as a baby.
To travel back one hour in time you have to turn the time turner once. If he was to kill Voldemort (71) at birth you'd have to turn the time turner approximately 622.372 times
In SSS-Class Suicide Hunter the main character goes back 24 hours each time he dies. At the start of the story he stabs himself 4050 times to return to when he can permanently kill the guy he wants to take revenge on. Fictional characters can do anything.
I came up with a concept similar to this once, but as a horror story. The power is activated with every death and the guy just uses suicide to undo stuff, redo stuff, or cheat consequences, etc. Eventually he gets knocked out while committing a crime that he had already re-done a few times. By the time he comes to, he's been arrested and either put in jail or wakes up handcuffed to a hospital bed. Enough time has passed that by the time he gets around to killing himself, it puts him back in the same position he was in anyway. So he decides "ok, guess I'm going to jail. At least if I get raped or something I can just kill myself and avoid that situation, and I have infinite chances to escape jail if the opportunity comes up."
Long story short, while he's in jail he starts to notice that the power isn't giving him a full 24 hours reset anymore. It goes to 22 hours, 20 hours, 18 hours, 16 hours, etc. He's become reckless by having the power to reset his life and he still takes it for granted at first, so he keeps using it. He eventually gets to a day where he gets stabbed every single time. No matter how he tries to avoid what happens, taking different routes, trying to find an ally before it happens, saying or doing different things, he ends up stabbed every single time. He starts losing his mind because he can tell that he's in some kind of inescapable fate. The story ends with his power is so worn down that the reset times are 0.6 seconds, 0.3 seconds, 0.1 seconds, 0.05 seconds, and he keeps resetting to fewer and fewer picoseconds before the moment he got stabbed over and over and over again.
I never wrote the story because I'm bad at dialogue but I think it'd be a good short horror story.
there was a batman: the brave and the bold episode like that, and a futurama episode like that
Frick. I thought I was just ripping off Edge of Tomorrow and throwing in the criminal setting and degrading power twist. Guess I'm a midwit.
Thanks for that, Anon. I'm going to put it into ChatGPT and publish it on Kindle now.
That little paragraph you jotted down kept me engrossed. it's a cool idea. But I have some notes:
What if instead of the power degrading, he just gets locked in a mental institution and physically can't kill himself? I'm thinking he gets sent to prison, then tries to kill himself but fails (because of the guards) so he is sent to a secure mental hospital.
Then you wouldn't need to introduce all kinds of extra rules half way through the story. It can just end with a nice logical snap.
You lose the infinite stabbing end, but I'm not sure it's worth all the extra work to get there.
I dreamed this exact dream a few months ago. Please get out of my head Satan
Wasn't that a reicky morty episode?
Lay off the weed bro dude
hmm, sounds interesting. Is this better than re:zero?
That would take over 10 minutes at 1 turn a second, get Ron to do it, I'm busy.
yeah I could do it 623 point 2 times. It isn't like an ESL is implying that the decimal denotes a comma, right haha?!
I play runescape
Time turners form a closed loop timeline, so that fact that nobody already has killed baby Riddle means that nobody can use a time turner to do it.
Ignoring the retcons in form of The Cursed Child and other bullshit, time-turner makes complete sense.
When they use it they don't actually change anything. Even before they travel back in time Harry gets his head hit with a rock and other stuff. They don't change the timeline, instead they fulfill their roles in the pre-determined world. They think they changed something but they did not. Which means that the "universe" would not let them change the other stuff. It's simply determined that they won't get that idea in their heads and that the time turners will eventually be destroyed.
Basically free will does not exist in HP universe. Weird, but that is literally how it was written.
Honestly, I don't think it would have been as noticeable if they had just not talked about it again.
>free will does not exist in HP universe
should we tell him boys?
I'll tell him. Free will doesn't exist here either. Its either biological determinism or some kind of religious determinism. Take your pick.
>Take your pick.
My pick would be a choice, of which I have none though right?
Correct.
>Correct.
This also implies a right and wrong answer, of which there is neither due to choice being an illusion though.
>illusion
Only for you. I know the truth.
>I know the truth.
As do I anon, just pointing out the absurdity of deterministic belief systems. What always gets me is when they attempt to get others to make a choice to believe them...
The way I think about it is to consider the two different things we mean when we say "world". First there's the cosmic world, the universe and everything beyond it, everything in existence which is bound by physical laws. Determinism rules this world, in which our human brains - and therefore our thoughts, decisions, and actions - are decided by the principle of cause and effect. Given the physical state and direction of the world - including our brain - at any given moment, there is only one possible state the world could take in the next moment, i.e. there is no way we could decide anything differently from how we will. I don't know the first thing about quantum physics so there might be some physicists out there who think differently, but this is what seems intuitive to me.
And secondly there's our world, the human world, the illusory world that we immediately observe and interact with, which exists within the human experience. This is the kind of world you are referring to when you say to someone "welcome to my world". The one where art, friendships, and laws exist, abstract concepts that have no physical manifestation in the cosmic world. In this world we see in terms of colors and shapes, we recognize faces, we recognize music, we categorize things like organisms and minerals, all things we experience through our human biases to create this world we live in which doesn't directly represent the physical cosmic world but is real nonetheless. And this is the world in which free will exists, just as music does, because we can conceive of it, we can see it, we can experience it and we react to it.
So if we're discussing physics or philosophy, go ahead and consider that free will may not exist in the literal sense. But if we're discussing or making decisions regarding our subjective human world, e.g. whether or not to punish a criminal, we should stay within the confines of the world we're discussing and accept free will.
seems like a cop out for not wanting to live what you believe.
Hylic be gone
t. midwit
>t. biologically hardwired to be a christcuck
>Basically free will does not exist in HP universe. Weird, but that is literally how it was written.
free will doesn't exist in the real world either
>Ignoring the retcons in form of The Cursed Child and other bullshit,
Elaborate please, I never read The Cursed Child.
It's a tumblr-tier fanfic about using time turners to change the past in a manner wholly inconsistent with how they work in Prisoner of Azkaban
not defending cursed child but they used an experimental time turner that was designed to go back years and not hours
that's not the issue, the issue is that the time travel itself works differently
already stated several times in the thread, time in HP is pre-determined, because the things that were "changed" weren't actually changes, but simply characters fulfilling their roles in the pre-determined timeline
in The Cursed Child it's like Back to the Future, they go back in time, change shit, go back and the universe is completely different
this is not how time travel, or the time itself worked in HP universe before
hermione states that if they ran into their other selves they would go mad and that would frick things up, so really it's just a matter of keeping a low profile. the story itself is dull, best part was the trolley witch fight, b***h went full freddy kreuger.
In the Prisoner of Azkaban the things that Harry and Hermione did after they went back in time with the Time-Turner already happened before they went back in time.
In The Cursed Child time travel works like Back to the Future but totally moronic.
Think I gotta read this now.
The hell is this?
When you're reading please remember that Hermione is black now.
lmao not bloody likely
Well her daughter is black at the very least. Take that as you will.
I refuse to believe this.
No u
Not up to you chud. Your time is over.
Imagine being 100% African but still ending up with British teeth
WHITE Emma will not be replaced.
well with the way woke media is going your time is almost over too.
kek have fun losing money on franchises that were once powerhouses in society until you fricking morons rekt them
Isn't it racist of them both to acknowledge and make such a big deal about how different they are because if their races?
Racist
Draco Jr. looks AI generated
It genuinely resembles this https://youtu.be/iE39q-IKOzA
Imagine the worst writing possible in the Harry Potter universe. It is to HP what the sequel trilogy was to Star Wars. Harry is a terrible deadbeat dad who openly despises his youngest son for/or who happens to end up in Slytherin. Harry fricking Potter, the neglected kid who lived in the cupboard under the stairs tells his own fricking son he wishes he was never born. So, depressed with (and possibly gay for) Harry's son Albus Severus (what a horrible fricking name) goes back in time with Draco Malfoy's son Scoripus because Amos "THAT'S MY BOY" Diggory is all sad about losing his son 20 years ago and asks for them to go back and fix it. Even though it was stated by JRK somewhere that Time Turners can only safely be used to travel back so far, they somehow go back 20 years. They try to save Cedric's life by getting him disqualified from the tournament. This has the unintentional effect of humiliating Cedric publicly. So much so he becomes resentful, hateful and evil and joins the fricking Death Eaters. He ends up killing Neville Longbottom so Neville can never kill Voldemort's pet snake Horcrux, Nagini. Thus, Voldemort wins. So not only do we have Harry Potter himself massively out of character, we have Cedric Diggory, held up in the series as a paragon of virtue, posessing good and innocence that even surpasses Harry, becoming a fricking bad guy for some cheap wacky plot twist. Oh also Voldemort, the guy obsessed with becoming immortal, of rejecting humanity and human things, has a daughter with Bellatrix. Not only would Voldemort, intent on never dying, not need a child for his legacy to be upheld, not only would he not want his own progeny potentially becoming his rival, but he wouldn't be interested in sex anyway. Also the timeline makes no sense as Bellatrix would have been 9 months pregnant with Voldemort's child during the whole Malfoy Manor thing.
>during the whole Malfoy Manor
Wasn't she meant to be pregnant between 6 and 7?
No, and I think JKR publicly admitted to fricking it up as well with her usual "I'm not good at math quote"
Which she used for other problems like claiming Hogwarts was founded around 1000 years prior to 1992 yet Merlin, a legend from Arthurian England, somehow attended. Or how when she did the Black/Malfoy family tree the date of births for various members would require 6 year olds to be having children and shit like that. Dumb b***h.
to be fair, thats also what a good editor is for.
Well the editor supposedly carried hard during the actual books but it's when she runs her mouth after the books were over that gaping holes start to show. Like the whole
>lol wizards shit where they stood and used Evanesco, the Vanishing spell to get rid of the waste until plumbing was invented
>Until plumbing was invented
First of all, plumbing had been around since fricking Rome. Second of all, the entire plot of the second fricking book revolves around a guy hiding the big bad final boss WITHIN THE PLUMBING SYSTEM
JKR said plumbing was later installed in the castle. So what, did the people renovating the fricking castle just shrug when they found the apparently not hidden entrance to the Chamber of not so Secrets and build pipes down to it without telling anyone?
I get it's a kids series but shit like that really grinds my gears.
>Second of all, the entire plot of the second fricking book revolves around a guy hiding the big bad final boss WITHIN THE PLUMBING SYSTEM
Glad I'm not the only one this pisses off. I think she went back however and made it so some Gaunt ancestor added thr pipes later to something
And nobody noticed this demented wizard hillbilly adding frickoff huge pipes all around the school?
Who knows. The books do have some shockingly clever writing at times, which makes me wonder if the theory it was ghostwritten is true.
They all worked exactly as claimed though
Harry's cloak was literally infallible. The only items in the series that countered it were Dumbledore's glasses and Moody's eye, both of which were potentially because they were enchanted by the Elder Wand
They were hired to add the pipes, plumbing postdates the founding of the school
>Dumbledore's glasses
u wot?
It's alluded to in several "scenes" in the book Dumbledore can see Harry under the cloak. Also he brags he doesn't need the Cloak to become fully invisible. He can cast a disillusionment charm so powerful he becomes actually invisible, while when anybody else uses the charm they merely become transparent.
So you're just making that bit up about his glasses being special, right?
Always happens with lore threads, some anon will try and mash their headcanon into normal discussion.
If only it wasn't so.
It's not the glasses, though, it's just Dumbledore wordlessly casting the human presence revealing charm. Can't see, but know someone's there.
How did you get from that to "it is his glasses and also it's because of the Elder Wand"? He can see through the Cloak because he's Dumbledore, he has his ways.
Why else would he be able to
Yea, the only item that countered it was another one of the Deathly Hallows.
Death was moronic or something idk
No I thought it was written somewhere. It's stated usual invisibility cloaks aren't perfectly invisible, they fade and lose their potency over the years, etc. Plus Harry's wasn't able to be magically removed from him in book 7.
>Why else would he be able to
>"Magic leaves traces"
So what makes more sense to you
Dumbledore gave himself magical glasses with the most powerful wand ever made
Or he just somehow randomly has special unique superman vision?
Cmon anon
he wears a buttplug that vibrates whenever a student comes close to him
This has been explained Rowling
https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Corvinus_Gaunt
>literally infallible. The only items in the series that countered it were
>And nobody noticed this demented wizard hillbilly adding frickoff huge pipes all around the school?
it's magic lol, literally pipus creatus and the work is done
>potentially because they were enchanted by the Elder Wand
The wand Death made could make things see through the cloak he made but couldnt see through himself?
>both of which were potentially because they were enchanted by the Elder Wand
You just fricking pulled this out of your ass.
>it was literally infallible
>except for the things that saw through it
>potentially because they were enchanted by the Elder Wand
They did not work as claimed. The Stone did not resurrect the dead, the Wand was not unbeatable, and the Cloak was not infallible. They were very powerful, but they were not the unstoppable items of Death itself the myth claimed, just powerful magical items created by some talented wizard brothers.
funny how the marauder's map was more powerful and useful than any of the deathly hallows and it was made by a bunch of school kids
>marauder's map
It worked only in Hogwars and its nearby territory though. The other Three worked everywhere
With the right wizard they could summon flammel and get the sorcerer's stone recipe. And become immortal
jfc, didnt know it was that bad. Now the whole Dumbledore is actually a homosexual and Hermione being a Black person makes more sense. There comes a point you have to save creations from their creator is seems.
I have no idea why so many creators do this to their own creations, it's insane. Not so much Star Wars as say what you want about the prequels, they were nowhere near as bad as the sequels and George was barely involved, but from Harry Potter to the Legend of Korra to James Cameron and Ridley Scott and Hideaki Anno it just seems creators are intent to murder their own creation as they hate what it's become
>>lol wizards shit where they stood and used Evanesco, the Vanishing spell to get rid of the waste until plumbing was invented
That was literally her telling people to stop asking her stupid questions on twitter by giving them a stupid answer back, though. It's a "Who pumps the tires on the batmobile" response.
It's pottermore canon
>it's non-canon canon
ogey
>non-canon
You wish
Anything written after book seven is non-canon
>pottermore
No longer exists.
Didn't Wizarding World just do the same thing?
I see, thanks
How do you not know those families aren't into pedophila?
>They try to save Cedric's life by getting him disqualified from the tournament. This has the unintentional effect of humiliating Cedric publicly. So much so he becomes resentful, hateful and evil and joins the fricking Death Eaters. He ends up killing Neville Longbottom
Kino
>Free will doesnt exist in the HP universe
Makes sense when you have literal prophecy in your universe, there is even that classic prophecy-trap where voldys efforts in preventing a chosen one rising to challenge him creates a chosen one to challenge him, bit cliche but it works, guess rowling wasn't a hack that day
>they didn’t change anything therefore free will doesn’t exist
Except they DID change things…they just had already done it. That’s like arguing free will doesn’t exist because I can’t change what I had for breakfast yesterday. I still chose at the time.
They didn't change anything. They did what they were destined to do because they have already done it in-universe. Hermione already threw a rock at Harry, that bird thing wasn't actually dead, but they did not see that which compelled them to travel back in time to ensure that the things that already happened happen.
Free will does not exist because they can't actually change things. They can't go back in time and save Voldemort because Voldemort exists in their timeline. They can only do things that have already happened, and nothing else.
She was already at two places at once before she used the Time Turner.
Basically she goes into one class, finishes it, goes back in time and goes to another class.
If, before using the Time Turner, she went to the second class, she would already see herself there.
Hermione literally uses it to go back in time to take multiple classes. How is her being in 2 places at the same time not changing anything?
She's only being observed as being at one place at the same time. Nobody sees two Hermiones, only one at a time.
She sees herself during Prisoner of Azkaban by the trees and Harry sees himself casting the patronus to save himself so.. erm..
Why do you think that is changing anything?
How the frick does it not change something? She was in one class and then goes back in time to go to another that she wasnt previously in. Are you honestly saying that her presence wouldn't alter a thing? The brainy know it all never jumped to answer a question that no one else would have, or that someone would have if they had a few more seconds of silence? She was no one's lab partner? she didn't even sit in a seat that someone else would have chosen to sit in?
>goes back in time to go to another that she wasnt previously in
She was always in that class though.
It's your bog standard time loop. It's as much a part of the structure of the universe as a crack is part of a glass vase.
Kinda interesting what chain of events would lead a potential time traveler from stopping Voldie before he became powerful.
He's actually a good guy when you get to know him?
time travel
That is actually pretty cool and the only way time travel could ever make sense in fiction.
12 Monkeys.
It does do something brainlet, it's just a closed time loop. You can't be moronic enough to see that there are literally two harry's existing at the same time and still say that it didnt do anything.
>They don't change the timeline, instead they fulfill their roles in the pre-determined world.
OR
You just watched the changed timeline, but not the original timeline.
Because once they change the events, a new timeline is created and the old one ceases to exist.
You could make a movie where in the first 30 minutes all the bad things happen, and once they get to the infirmary, just play the regular movie from the start.
Fricking pseud.
What?
We're literally shown Harry getting kicked in the head with a stone at the first half of the film.
I'm not sure what is your point. Like in some meta way they showed the "changed" timeline where Harry gets hit in the head and then when they travel in time it's actually a cut to a timeline where Harry did not get hit in the head? This is a really fricking convoluted meta interpretation. There's also no signifier that a timeline where Harry did not get in the head exists.
Is this bait?
It didn't actually revive people, it brought them back in the form of ghosts.
Well maybe Snape wanted to be a comfy Hogwarts ghost terrorising students forever.
Okay now that's got me wondering why all the hogwarts ghosts get to stick around without the resurrection stone
Because they are actual ghosts, that is, an imprint of their soul left behind when they died, it's a conscious decision, and one that very few wizards make because you're just leaving an empty shell behind forever. The Resurrection Stone doesn't bring a ghost, it brings their actual spirit back from death, but only as a shade that disappears once you stop using it. It's a myth that it actually resurrects the dead. Like the other two Deathly Hallows, it's merely a powerful artifact, not the tools of Death itself, the cloak is strong and doesn't wear out, but it's far from impenetrable, and the Elder Wand is very powerful, but it is not unbeatable.
So how come harry didnt turn into a ghost?
He wasn't revived with the resurrection stone
cause he didn't die, he ended up in a Limbo from which he had a choice to come back to life
SURE OKAY moron
>HE'S TOTALLY DEAD BUT... NOT HE ACTUALLY HAS.... A CHOICE IF HE WANTS TO COME BACK.. EVDN THOUGH HE'S NOT DEAD
Fricking morons and hack writing if true
homie he was in the place that's between life and death
death is when you fricking die and can't come back
if you can come back you're not dead
it was basically a coma
Then everything he saw could be fake. Coma dreams are not cannon. Voldamort could still be alive
You're dumb, anon, it's okay, it happens to some people.
The killing curse fricked up the piece of Voldemort's soul in Harry. Harry wasn't killed because of this.
So your saying love can also create a horcrux now? How are they even dark magic then?
Something sure as shit did. The piece of Voldemort's soul was there wasn't it?
He didn't die I guess, it's an asspull like equivalent exchange. The afterlife took the piece of Voldemort's soul attached to his, thereby destroying the last horcrux
He didn't die, the part of Voldemorts soul that attached itself to his did. Also, the people ressurected by the stone didn't get brought back as actual ghosts, the book makes a distinction between the ghosts we meet throughout the series as having rejected moving on when they died, whereas people brought back by stones are brought back forcefully and so don't belong in the world and they feel that.
>He didn't die, the part of Voldemorts soul that attached itself to his did. Also, the people ressurected by the stone didn't get brought back as actual ghosts, the book makes a distinction between the ghosts we meet throughout the series as having rejected moving on when they died, whereas people brought back by stones are brought back forcefully and so don't belong in the world and they feel that.
one correction here, voldemort cannot kill harry while he lives, he killed the soul piece because it does not have the protection, only harry and voldemort's living body do. The reason that they're not ghosts is because ghosts have to want to come back, the stone forces it.
Because you have to choose to remain as a ghost after death. Most do not.
The horcrux on his forehead acted as a warding spell.If you watched or read the source, you would know this.
>The most powerful artifact in the world does the same this as a newspaper
It only brings them back as far as I can tell for the user of the stone. They're an appartiion. The stone is a trick/trap by death to lure the user to suicide, that's why Dumbledore left it to Harry in the snitch. So he'd be able to kill himself when the time was right to get rid of the Horcrux inside him. The stone would "bring back" all his dead loved ones, who were apparitions and not actually representative of his actual loved ones. Notice how they all told him how easy, painless and nice dying is as they encouraged him to take his own life.
that makes sense, is this actually what Rowling intended?
The whole point of the Deathly Hallows is the famous story about them is bullshit, and while powerful they do not work as claimed.
While I can see it, I think it's reading into it a little too much.
It definitely works though.
you're giving her too much credit but this is now my head cannon regardless
That sounds amazing and for that reason alone is not true because rowling is a moron and a hack
Then what's the stone actually then. This is some BS that Sirius and Remus actually died the FOREVER kind
are you and idiot mate? didn't you watch the movie? the stone don't bring physical bodies back.
He saw pet semetery.
Sometimes dead is better.
Why didn't he just use a defibrillator and CPR?
yeah I don't trust that rock for some reason...
This looks familiar. Hellraiser?
Sounds thrilling. *eyes roll out of skull*
>This looks familiar. Hellraiser?
Yes
Wicked.
>OH MY LORD HIGH LEVIATHAN, MASTER OF THE LABYRINTH, ARCHDUKE OF CHAOS, I BESEECH THEE...
who talks like that?
the further boundaries of pleasure and pain
Why didn't Voldemort just make a homeless guy rape and murder Harry? Or just murder him or whatever.
Harry was a Horcrux meaning he literally could not have been killed by anything other that specific stuff like the Gryffindor sword or the Elder Wand or Basilisk Tooth
not only that, even doing that would only kill the Voldemort's soul shard inside him, so he had to be killed twice
>he literally could not have been killed by anything other that specific stuff like the Gryffindor sword or the Elder Wand or Basilisk Tooth
so all the tension in the films about him being in danger is completely retconned away by an incompetent author? Shocker
dumby knew. thats why its okay that he kept sending harry into danger
>Harry was a Horcrux meaning he literally could not have been killed by anything other that specific stuff like the Gryffindor sword or the Elder Wand or Basilisk Tooth
That's not true. He can still die normally through a killing curse, which is why living horcruxes were so risky
>which is why living horcruxes were so risky
they had to kill the snake with Griffendors blade though.
They DID kill the snake with Gryffindor's sword, but that doesn't mean they had to. Nagini was no doubt protected by a bunch of additional magical crap that Voldy would have added to keep her safe, which the sword conveniently cuts through
but zero magic worked against it, like the other horcruxs. And if you can just make things invincible with magic why wouldn't you do that for yourself?
Powerful Dark wizards do make themselves practically invincible, which is why the unblockable killing curse is so broken
That's obviously not true of Harry, who got hit by curses all the time
Voldemort Avada Kedavra'd him and he came back. Because he didn't kill Harry, he expelled his part of the soul from him.
But only because Voldemort also had Harry's blood in his veins in a way that left them doubly linked. And Harry had to willingly let Voldemort kill him. It was a very specific one-time bit of magic
Killing curse targets the soul, which means it would have hit Voldermort's soul fragment first. The question is if he could die through non-soul damage methods: iirc, the diary was stupidly resistant to Ginny's attempts to destroy it, but we see Harry get damaged all the time, so that might just be something Voldermort charmed the diary with.
Harry isn't really even a Horcrux in the traditional sense. There's a whole ritual involved with making a Horcrux that Voldemort didn't do. Lily's ancient mommy magic killed him so hard that it blasted a piece of his soul off that got stuck to Harry's soul. It's not really the same thing
>Lily's ancient mommy magic
This was also because Voldemort's soul was already fractured to an insane degree, no one had made so many Horcruxes before.
>no one had made so many Horcruxes before.
That we know of.
in the books, ravenclaws diadem was destroyed by the fiendfyre curse from crabbe
Yes, he included that under "specific stuff"
kind of weak that they had all this trouble with destroying the horcruxes, when you could just nuke it with a spell
It's an extremely destructive spell that's impossible to control, and most people don't bother to learn it for that reason
>open room or requirement
>use it as a nuke room
fixed it. Now send some snipers into the towers at the final battle, works better than shooting lighting bolbs out of your wand
Because they were standing next to the Room of Requirement the entire book right
>when you could just nuke it with a spell
The one that immediately goes out of control and destroys both the caster AND the entire Room of Requirement?
was the room of requirement destroyed, or just that version of it?
Completely destroyed, it's filled with fiendfyre now
What would happen if you shot him in the head
Litterally nothing would happen. He's litterally wolverine and has immortality ever since the horcrux and after it was half severed due to him seeing voldamort still alive
'Cause JK Rowling wanted to write a children's story.
Why did Voldy try and kill the potters to begin with?
Prophecy nonsense. He heard that he'd be killed by a boy born in July (which happened to be both Harry and Neville) and he chose to kill Harry first which obviously backfired
So he believes in prophesy? AND that he can avoid it? lol the more I hear about this story the worse it gets.
He went to kill Harry because Harry is half-blood like him so Voldemort felt for threatened by him.
Accio bum
RON STOOOOPP
RONALD WEASLEY
Aaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
It's levioSUUUUUUUUUUH
I remember Oney describing how the original version of the cartoon was really uncomfortable because it was basically just raping Hermione, so he just changed it so that she liked it and that made it funny again.
I think that was in a Sleepycast, don't remember which one. That was one of the funniest BTS thing to come out of that podcast to me.
>Why did Voldy try and kill the potters to begin with?
His parents were the only ones in the dark side club who decided not to kill for fun.
WHY DIDN’T GOD SO US ALL A FAVOR AND KILL OP IN HIS SLEEP THIS MORNING? HUH? I ASK MYSELF THAT ALOT HERE.
The stone just created some holograms is dead people. There's no guarantee they actually were real ghosts
Wrong they are litterally dead pepole
He was in limbo
Brainlet. Pay attention to what you read/watch
Why did he throw it away? Could've been pretty useful when he becomes a wizard cop. I probably would've at least put it somewhere I remembered rather than dropping it in the middle of the forest
Right, I get that Lily's love spell stopped Voldemort from killing Harry as as baby and the first book/film but how long does that shit last? Did Harry survive at the end because of the love spell again or was it because he was a horcrux? If it was the latter then Nigini should've come back at some point right? If it was the former then there's never been any danger when Harry is in Voldomorts presence right?
kinda obvious anon, Harry is a spoiled little POS
So we saw Harry break his arm in the dumb sports game he plays, so we know his physical body can be broken. What if you rolled over him with a steamroller? Crushing all of his body and destroying his brain
because its a movie for small children
I always wondered - do you think Voldemort fricked the snake? She was the right size.
He wanted to stick it up his pee pee hole.
should've brought hedwig back to life
Why didn't Harry utilize more muggle technology after being raised as one?
>Using a quill and inkwell when ballpoint pens exist
>Mix shit from potions class with grenades or shotgun shells
Hell even shit from the Weasley gag store is easily weaponizable but they didn't do shit with it.
Worst wizards in all of fiction. All that magic and ZERO imagination. Wasted Potential: The Series
It is canonical that wizards are objectively moronic and have gotten so used to the convenience of magic that they lack ingenuity and innovation when confronted with something they can't just wave a wand at. Muggleborn are initially spared this, however they also grow duller as they grow accustomed to the ease of magic.
Explain to me why wizards didn't take over the world when they invented the wand. There's no reason the world of harry potter should be ours but with wizards sometimes.
>be lily potter
>that guy who was obsessed with you in highschool is now obsessed with your son
Turbocomfy movies
i hate fake boobs bros
t. flaming homosexual
same
kys
no u
Why didn't Harry make a sniper rifle bullet using Basilisk tusk and snipe Voldemort from a mile away?