>Make fantasy movie >People who don't like fantasy should go see this movie! >Make sci fi movie >People who don't like sci-fi should go see this movie!
New guy at work is literally what you just said, they are like propaganda cartoons in real life. It's mind blowing and not surprising they have been vilified for so long
when aids vectors feel comfortable and start talking, they can really be stomach turning and not realise it.
the stuff they do stays within their circles and they are so surrounded by it that they begin to think it is completely normal.
normal people don't realise the depths of foulness involved or they'd probably start burning them at the stake again.
>I cheered, I shouted, I fisted my bro, I cried, I stood and cheered, it's absolutely everything that you'd hoped it was gonna be. I'm so proud to be in him, and I can't wait for you to see it
I mean it's possible if he snuck into the gayest theater in the gayest part of San Francisco. I think his big problem is that he is so fist-deep in his gay bubble in Hollywood that he forgot the rest of the world isn't like that.
I could believe a theater full of Commiefornians would piss and shit their pants with laughter at this movie. Even with a theater sold out with sodomites it could still fail everywhere else.
>and while I was trying to sneak back out a little boy noticed me on the way out and shouted "YOU'RE BILLY EICHNER THE WRITER AND STAR OF THIS KINO!" >at that moment everyone in the theater went silent as they turned towards me to let their eyes adjust to the dark back of the theater, I was frozen >all of a sudden one person started clapping, then another and another until everyone in the theater was clapping and cheering, I tried to compose myself but I was just wrecked by joy and couldn't stop crying, everything was for this moment >they lifted me above their heads and cheered my name >then I looked back at the little boy who was giving me a thumbs up and asked him who he was >he just looked at me and smiled "me? my name is Albert Einstein", then he winked at me before he departed. it was truly a magical night
>all those lgtbi groups >twitter literally full of homosexuals >pozzed products still bomb
Shits like these convince the dead internet theory is real and twitter is full of bots and people on streets at most pretend to like homosexuals
Zero fricking chance. Even if the entire screening was gays and drag queens, I doubt this shit is funny because Billy Eichner is NOT funny. His character in Parks and Rec is fricking insufferable and completely out of place with everyone else.
The regular lives of gays is hilarious drama, why would they need to see it on a movie. BP gave Africans and African Americans the fantasy of a powerful, advanced and wealthy superstate.
Because homosexualry is repulsive and we are beginning to figure out that being open minded and tolerant isn't working and that you sick child grooming fricks will never leave us alone, and we are beginning to learn to hate and despise you disease-spreading scat fetishist boyfrickers all over again.
Correctly! Shit, this isn't even the first one this century. There's been I Love You Phillip Morris, The Broken Hearts Club, even But I'm a Cheerleader had at least one prominent male couple.
Went to see this with my sister-in-law who’s a fan of Billy in The Street. Was ok, some parts made me laugh but I don’t think it’s something I’d ever see again.
Also, according to this movie, all gay men are polyamorous..?
>THE FIRST EVER GAY ROM-COM BY A MAJOR STUDIO IN CALIFORNIA >THE FIRST, EVER GAY SUPERHERO MOVIE WITH A RED AND ORANGE COSTUME THAT HAS NO CAPE >THE VERY FIRST EVER GAY HORROR-SCIFI MOVIE THAT ISN'T SET IN A SPACESHIP IN A NON-ALTERANTE UNIVERSE WITHOUT HOLOGRAPHIC CONTROL PANELS
Gays should just be grateful we don't lock them up anymore. Congratulations, you're free to pack all the fudge you want and piss in each other's mouths and get married. Go ham. Why do you even NEED a gay blockbuster? I've never had a blockbuster about me and it's not killing me inside. There's no right to Hollywood hits about your particular lifestyle.
Straight, Gay whatever it's probably an ok movie but nothing revolutionary or game-changing. Besides it's October and everyone wants horror kino. This movie might have done better coming out in November but probably only by a few million.
>>but nothing revolutionary or game-changing >top 21st century comedy by rolling stones >91% critic 92% audience score on RT >"""not revolutionary"""
ok polchud
Everyone think it's hot shit when they are hot shit.
Wait a month untill you cool off and see if somebody remembers it or cares, that's how you know it's good or not.
🙁 I know you're just trolling, but really how does anyone think RT should be taken even semi-seriously? What I mean is that good movies are often polarizing. One critic thinks it's an A+, the other thinks it's an F. That sounds like a movie I want to see! But it averages out to a C. Which not only turns me off the movie for being mediocre, but it literally represents no one's opinion! Someone thought it was great and someone thought it was reprehensible shit, but C says everyone thought it was meh!
I know you guys on Cinemaphile are bright and don't actually take these ratings seriously, but I know a lot of people who also "don't take them seriously" yet still think it's a valuable bellweather as to whether a movie is generally worth seeing or not. It's not! It's a stupid metric and you'd be better served by finding a few critics whose tastes are similar to yours and watching what they like!
>>but nothing revolutionary or game-changing >top 21st century comedy by rolling stones >91% critic 92% audience score on RT >"""not revolutionary"""
ok polchud
reviews dont mean absolute fricking squat when there is an inkling of politics to the movie/show/game/whatever
back in 96, gay stuff was kinda new
The Birdcage benefited from its gayness because normies thought it was interesting
the problem is that everything is gay now
this new movie is not shocking because it's gay
it is boring because it's gay
normies didn't reject it. they ignored it. they didn't notice it.
and that was a remake of a french film which was even a bigger commercial hit >The film was released in Italy on October 20, 1978 and in France on October 25. It was a considerable commercial success, becoming one of the highest-grossing foreign-language films released in the United States of all time. It won the Golden Globe Award for Best Foreign Language Film and was nominated for three Oscars: Best Director (Molinaro), Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Costume Design
I love this movie. Gene Hackman is the best, though his wife has some pretty funny lines too. Ally Mcbeal and robin Williams son are both insufferable props. Hank Azaria is also fantastic.
> people who saw this movie enjoyed it
That's nice. I'm not going to see it because it doesn't look like it would appeal to me. If you saw it and enjoyed it, that's your right, I certainly won't pretend I somehow know more about it than you.
Cute, appealing characters.
They could have gotten the fujoshi audience to see this if any of the guys were remotely attractive instead of aggressively mediocre dime-a-dozen American gays with no style and disgusting facial hair.
>destroying your anus to the point of needing a diaper >"just" a taboo
It's ludicrous. And modern.
Historically, gays did intercrural (thigh) sex; or at least alternated so they didn't completely blow out their butthole
This. See also all the recent surveys that have found anal sex on the rise among female-male couples, and shockingly to absolutely no one, it's the males who are the enthusiastic proponents and are whinging and sometimes forcing the females to do it.
Not that the /misc/ sewage leaking into this board will hear it.
This. See also all the recent surveys that have found anal sex on the rise among female-male couples, and shockingly to absolutely no one, it's the males who are the enthusiastic proponents and are whinging and sometimes forcing the females to do it.
Not that the /misc/ sewage leaking into this board will hear it.
>Actually we aren't some degenerate frick hungry homosexuals
>A wide study in the US from a few years ago showed 70% of gay men dont actually have anal sex.
homie, I don't think that study understands what the words "gay men" mean!
Honestly, I don't even know who "billy eichner" is
never heard of him, if I did, it was in passing
is his name supposed to be a selling point?
who? what?
I don't give a shit.
he was pretty funny as a sassy gay dude who asked npcs random questions on the street, ive seen a couple clips of him
still had zero desire to see open gay romance
I actively avoid spending money on movies. Who did they expect to see this movie though?
Billy Eichner is an unlikeable b***h with a lazy eye that's occasionally funny in short bits. No one is seeing a movie for him.
And all these articles read like a gofundme for down on their luck gays instead of a movie. Just shut up and send it to streaming
>you only have a 1 in 100 chance of gettin hiv, stop scaremongering about gay people! >majority of gays on body count videos break 100, NUMEROUS times they broke 1000
Who did they think this premise would appeal to? Women like romcoms because they can self-insert as the girl and straight men don't want gay shit shoved in their face
That only works when characters are actually characters. Supernatural brothers were shipped. I'm sure they shipped other guys in Harry Potter too
What they don't like is HE IS GAY BTW DID I MENTION HE IS GAY GAY GAY? characters. Maybe actually write a story, women do love shipping straight characters together or normal stories featuring 2 hot guys
Again, vocal minority (besides the rape thing). Most women don't use fanfic sites. That would be like saying most men are nazis because there's a lot of them on /misc/.
Again, vocal minority (besides the rape thing). Most women don't use fanfic sites. That would be like saying most men are nazis because there's a lot of them on /misc/.
You'd be surprised by how many women (who regularly consume media beyond what "everyone's watching") actually have that kind of fantasy.
That's something I notice too. They don't want gay characters, they want straight characters they can ship because apparently they can only live vicariously through guys they'd wanna frick fricking each other.
There was some sort of study which theorized women like watching attractive males engaged in romantic relationships, but are uncomfortable comparing themselves to their female partners and feel a sense of abstract jealousy.
Pairing them with another attractive male solves both these issues, while giving them 2x as much hotness to look at.
Another study posited yaoi manga offers women a way to explore sexuality and pornography that is completely devoid of male presence. Since men are repulsed by male homosexuality, it makes this kind of environment a "safe haven" of sorts; although it features men only, it is made *by women* for *women*, in a similar vein to how most pornography is made *by men* for *men*.
Nobody wants to see two dudes kissing. Like sure, every dude should kiss his homies goodnight, but that's different. We say 'no homo' before our tongues intertwine. Anyone who just flaunts their sexuality has the appeal of a frat boy. >yeah, dude, i was totally porking this chick with my dick!
Is equivalent to >actually, I'm a bisexualy polyamorous blah blah i like penis
That shit is whack
Reminder you WILL pay to watch the movie or you will be labeled a BIGOT! Women will now quiz you on the content of the movie and if they find out you didn't see it they will NOT frick you.
guys who pretend to be super cool with gay stuff and like "im queer" because they like tomboy chicks or whatever are so fricking pathetic
be gay whatever, noone cares, except for the "omg im soo stoked that ur gay man thats so based" guys
I can watch women licking each other’s pussies all day but the second two dudes’ lips touch each other I feel physically sick. This is because I’m normal.
As a straight man, gay "romance" disgusts me. I can stomach all kinds of stuff but the second two men start kissing i feel like throwing up. I have a theory that if men kissing doesn't make you sick to your stomach, you're at least bisexual. There is no in between.
Why do they not understand that there is nothing appealing about this to straight men? Gay sex is at the top of my list of revolting sexual acts just below necrophilia.
>Make fantasy movie
>People who don't like fantasy should go see this movie!
>Make sci fi movie
>People who don't like sci-fi should go see this movie!
>make movie
>people who don’t like movies should go see this movie!
the world wasnt ready
is that what you want me to tell ya?
cuz I'll do it again
R E T V R N
Did this really happen?
No he was getting fricked in the ass in a piss orgy like most gays do regularly
the old piss monkeypox special
New guy at work is literally what you just said, they are like propaganda cartoons in real life. It's mind blowing and not surprising they have been vilified for so long
He was getting fricked in the ass in a piss orgy at your workplace?
when aids vectors feel comfortable and start talking, they can really be stomach turning and not realise it.
the stuff they do stays within their circles and they are so surrounded by it that they begin to think it is completely normal.
normal people don't realise the depths of foulness involved or they'd probably start burning them at the stake again.
moronic chud nugger projection
nasty homosexual
I first I call bullshit but its litterally a gay movie made for gays, so this shit is completely plausible for them
just own it, its a niche movie so at least he's owning it and likes the work he did
lmfao. They're just straight up lying now. Fricking disgusting.
>I cheered, I shouted, I fisted my bro, I cried, I stood and cheered, it's absolutely everything that you'd hoped it was gonna be. I'm so proud to be in him, and I can't wait for you to see it
>“The audience howled with laughter start to finish, burst into applause at the end, and some were wiping away tears as they walked out. Really.
posted wrong image
I mean it's possible if he snuck into the gayest theater in the gayest part of San Francisco. I think his big problem is that he is so fist-deep in his gay bubble in Hollywood that he forgot the rest of the world isn't like that.
I could believe a theater full of Commiefornians would piss and shit their pants with laughter at this movie. Even with a theater sold out with sodomites it could still fail everywhere else.
Those weren't tears
This drama queen cloying weirdo hyperbole is one of the reasons why straight people avoided his movie.
>and while I was trying to sneak back out a little boy noticed me on the way out and shouted "YOU'RE BILLY EICHNER THE WRITER AND STAR OF THIS KINO!"
>at that moment everyone in the theater went silent as they turned towards me to let their eyes adjust to the dark back of the theater, I was frozen
>all of a sudden one person started clapping, then another and another until everyone in the theater was clapping and cheering, I tried to compose myself but I was just wrecked by joy and couldn't stop crying, everything was for this moment
>they lifted me above their heads and cheered my name
>then I looked back at the little boy who was giving me a thumbs up and asked him who he was
>he just looked at me and smiled "me? my name is Albert Einstein", then he winked at me before he departed. it was truly a magical night
>and they the whole theater had a standard frick party because we are gays and that is what gays do every chance they get
The whole theater was straight people which was the crazy part, he did find the little by outside the theater later and raped him though.
>didn't molest the little boy before leaving
At least make it believable
>Really.
>and then the entire room clapped
>all those lgtbi groups
>twitter literally full of homosexuals
>pozzed products still bomb
Shits like these convince the dead internet theory is real and twitter is full of bots and people on streets at most pretend to like homosexuals
>Getting results
>Underperforming
Which one is it!
Are those two guys assfricking behind that man?
Zero fricking chance. Even if the entire screening was gays and drag queens, I doubt this shit is funny because Billy Eichner is NOT funny. His character in Parks and Rec is fricking insufferable and completely out of place with everyone else.
>sold-out theatre
frick no
I was busy eating cold spaghetti alfredo
I didn't feel represented.
Why do women love gay stories from asia though
Because these aren't about real gays, it is about female fantasy gays.
so why isn't this the Billion dollar Black Panther for gays?
Because Disney isn’t openly buying their own tickets for this one.
The regular lives of gays is hilarious drama, why would they need to see it on a movie. BP gave Africans and African Americans the fantasy of a powerful, advanced and wealthy superstate.
We're like 4% of men at best. And men, even gay men, don't actually like romcoms lmao
they should have been black
Because homosexualry is repulsive and we are beginning to figure out that being open minded and tolerant isn't working and that you sick child grooming fricks will never leave us alone, and we are beginning to learn to hate and despise you disease-spreading scat fetishist boyfrickers all over again.
>first gay rom com
I honestly doubt that.
Correctly! Shit, this isn't even the first one this century. There's been I Love You Phillip Morris, The Broken Hearts Club, even But I'm a Cheerleader had at least one prominent male couple.
Ridiculous and untrue.
Who's the top in a 69?
There are two other threads right now with the same topic, and you made this one like some (you) starving loser. Be original.
Went to see this with my sister-in-law who’s a fan of Billy in The Street. Was ok, some parts made me laugh but I don’t think it’s something I’d ever see again.
Also, according to this movie, all gay men are polyamorous..?
>according to this movie
Minimum of 10 partners a year
>THE FIRST EVER GAY ROM-COM BY A MAJOR STUDIO IN CALIFORNIA
>THE FIRST, EVER GAY SUPERHERO MOVIE WITH A RED AND ORANGE COSTUME THAT HAS NO CAPE
>THE VERY FIRST EVER GAY HORROR-SCIFI MOVIE THAT ISN'T SET IN A SPACESHIP IN A NON-ALTERANTE UNIVERSE WITHOUT HOLOGRAPHIC CONTROL PANELS
It's getting kind of silly. There are a lot of gay movies now, so it's really hard to came up with new firsts to advertise it.
Gays should just be grateful we don't lock them up anymore. Congratulations, you're free to pack all the fudge you want and piss in each other's mouths and get married. Go ham. Why do you even NEED a gay blockbuster? I've never had a blockbuster about me and it's not killing me inside. There's no right to Hollywood hits about your particular lifestyle.
the musical was better
Willies, willies, I like willies
It's "I love willies"
does the movie have a monkeypox joke
Straight, Gay whatever it's probably an ok movie but nothing revolutionary or game-changing. Besides it's October and everyone wants horror kino. This movie might have done better coming out in November but probably only by a few million.
>>but nothing revolutionary or game-changing
>top 21st century comedy by rolling stones
>91% critic 92% audience score on RT
>"""not revolutionary"""
ok polchud
You’re not going to win the election, Beto.
Everyone think it's hot shit when they are hot shit.
Wait a month untill you cool off and see if somebody remembers it or cares, that's how you know it's good or not.
>Box office: $185.3 million
>in 1996
>82% critic 81% audience on RT
lol try again
people actually enjoy or remember the bird cage. no one will remember bros
You can jerk off with your percentage as much as you want, but the market and people have voted with their wallet already.
>...and that's a good thing
🙁 I know you're just trolling, but really how does anyone think RT should be taken even semi-seriously? What I mean is that good movies are often polarizing. One critic thinks it's an A+, the other thinks it's an F. That sounds like a movie I want to see! But it averages out to a C. Which not only turns me off the movie for being mediocre, but it literally represents no one's opinion! Someone thought it was great and someone thought it was reprehensible shit, but C says everyone thought it was meh!
I know you guys on Cinemaphile are bright and don't actually take these ratings seriously, but I know a lot of people who also "don't take them seriously" yet still think it's a valuable bellweather as to whether a movie is generally worth seeing or not. It's not! It's a stupid metric and you'd be better served by finding a few critics whose tastes are similar to yours and watching what they like!
reviews dont mean absolute fricking squat when there is an inkling of politics to the movie/show/game/whatever
back in 96, gay stuff was kinda new
The Birdcage benefited from its gayness because normies thought it was interesting
the problem is that everything is gay now
this new movie is not shocking because it's gay
it is boring because it's gay
normies didn't reject it. they ignored it. they didn't notice it.
>back in 96
>gay stuff was new
homie, you are underage b&
birdcage is also you know good. like funny. well acted and directed.
that might be something as well.
and that was a remake of a french film which was even a bigger commercial hit
>The film was released in Italy on October 20, 1978 and in France on October 25. It was a considerable commercial success, becoming one of the highest-grossing foreign-language films released in the United States of all time. It won the Golden Globe Award for Best Foreign Language Film and was nominated for three Oscars: Best Director (Molinaro), Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Costume Design
I love this movie. Gene Hackman is the best, though his wife has some pretty funny lines too. Ally Mcbeal and robin Williams son are both insufferable props. Hank Azaria is also fantastic.
Gene hackman was best in everything he was in.
Even gay movies back in the day use to have class and it wasn't some deranged subversive in-your-face type of shit
> people who saw this movie enjoyed it
That's nice. I'm not going to see it because it doesn't look like it would appeal to me. If you saw it and enjoyed it, that's your right, I certainly won't pretend I somehow know more about it than you.
My neighbor is nice guy but total gayget. He saw this and said it was ok. Said it was stupid for theater and should of been on netflix.
BECAUSE GAS IS ALMOST SEVEN FRICKING DOLLARS A GALLON.
fake news
I am not the target audience.
Now is the time for the lgbtqap crowd to put their money if they like this kind of thing.
Ok, how did a tranime lesbian show do it?
Cute, appealing characters.
They could have gotten the fujoshi audience to see this if any of the guys were remotely attractive instead of aggressively mediocre dime-a-dozen American gays with no style and disgusting facial hair.
hello, how does anime get money? thanks in advance
Merch sales
well, if they'd made "sistahs" with a quirky pair of sexy lesbians I imagine the box office results would be very different
ASS TE ASS
>expecting normal people to pay money to watch some homosexual movie
Sorry, sweaty, but if I can't identify with the characters in the film, I won't see it.
REPRESENTATION MATTERS!
what a waste of a beautiful font the New Yorker has
I'm liberal but gays kissing and shit is gross so not going to see it
>watch sex education
>gays subplot
>change channel
>going to hurt gay protag is having gay sex
how many gays do we have again? 0.1%? With inflation make that 1%?
I would have unironically gone to see this if everything was exactly the same but the title was "gays"
why would you appeal so hard to the opposite audience? seems desperate
homosexuals get on my nerves IRL, why would I pay to see more of them?
Because homosexuality is repugnant, and even if people are willing to tolerate it they don't want to see it or take part in it.
This. Gay men can only have sex via anal and the majority of straight couples find that to be “taboo”
>destroying your anus to the point of needing a diaper
>"just" a taboo
It's ludicrous. And modern.
Historically, gays did intercrural (thigh) sex; or at least alternated so they didn't completely blow out their butthole
>Gay men can only have sex via anal
A wide study in the US from a few years ago showed 70% of gay men dont actually have anal sex.
someone has to be the top
This. See also all the recent surveys that have found anal sex on the rise among female-male couples, and shockingly to absolutely no one, it's the males who are the enthusiastic proponents and are whinging and sometimes forcing the females to do it.
Not that the /misc/ sewage leaking into this board will hear it.
Oh no you posted the truth be careful you might make a poltard rage
Are they also the ones fricking kids?
Those are trannies anon
The lengths whites go to to avoid having kids.
>Actually we aren't some degenerate frick hungry homosexuals
>A wide study in the US from a few years ago showed 70% of gay men dont actually have anal sex.
homie, I don't think that study understands what the words "gay men" mean!
wasn't love simon a romcom?
Im not a gay. Never was.
>Hollywood actually thought that normal Americans want to see gay degenerate shit.
If it was about lesbians I might have gone or at least torrented it. But men fricking is just gay.
Honestly, I don't even know who "billy eichner" is
never heard of him, if I did, it was in passing
is his name supposed to be a selling point?
who? what?
I don't give a shit.
this
fricking cern pushing all these nobodies in the limelight, pretending that they're a thing
he was pretty funny as a sassy gay dude who asked npcs random questions on the street, ive seen a couple clips of him
still had zero desire to see open gay romance
>a movie about a subject that over 50% of the population finds completely disgusting
why indeed
I don't spend money on porn I actually like. Why would I spend it on stuff that doesn't appeal to me?
Who is this person?
I actively avoid spending money on movies. Who did they expect to see this movie though?
Billy Eichner is an unlikeable b***h with a lazy eye that's occasionally funny in short bits. No one is seeing a movie for him.
And all these articles read like a gofundme for down on their luck gays instead of a movie. Just shut up and send it to streaming
I'm gay as frick and I'm not seeing this.
There are better comedies out there
>big scary bargraph
>literally has to stretch out 1% to make it look like it's scary.
guess that epidemic didn't happen then
>you only have a 1 in 100 chance of gettin hiv, stop scaremongering about gay people!
>majority of gays on body count videos break 100, NUMEROUS times they broke 1000
And as the chance is per sex with that body count the overall quickly reaches 100%.
My body count is 2. I'm 26
It's pretty fricking gay.
because I'm poor
Who did they think this premise would appeal to? Women like romcoms because they can self-insert as the girl and straight men don't want gay shit shoved in their face
Probably hoping women and girls would see it the way guys would see a movie about hot lesbians.
That only works when characters are actually characters. Supernatural brothers were shipped. I'm sure they shipped other guys in Harry Potter too
What they don't like is HE IS GAY BTW DID I MENTION HE IS GAY GAY GAY? characters. Maybe actually write a story, women do love shipping straight characters together or normal stories featuring 2 hot guys
Thats a vocal minority. Women in general don't do that.
Women lie a lot. Go check any fic website and majority are women with rape/yaoi fetish
Again, vocal minority (besides the rape thing). Most women don't use fanfic sites. That would be like saying most men are nazis because there's a lot of them on /misc/.
You'd be surprised by how many women (who regularly consume media beyond what "everyone's watching") actually have that kind of fantasy.
That's something I notice too. They don't want gay characters, they want straight characters they can ship because apparently they can only live vicariously through guys they'd wanna frick fricking each other.
There was some sort of study which theorized women like watching attractive males engaged in romantic relationships, but are uncomfortable comparing themselves to their female partners and feel a sense of abstract jealousy.
Pairing them with another attractive male solves both these issues, while giving them 2x as much hotness to look at.
Another study posited yaoi manga offers women a way to explore sexuality and pornography that is completely devoid of male presence. Since men are repulsed by male homosexuality, it makes this kind of environment a "safe haven" of sorts; although it features men only, it is made *by women* for *women*, in a similar vein to how most pornography is made *by men* for *men*.
This used to be true as BL was very woman focused, as an offshoot of shoujo manga. It was very distinct from geicomi flby and for gay men too.
Since 2010 there's been a shift though, with bl becoming less shoujo in its art, plus more overlap between bl and geicomi
Armond told me not to
Watching a homosexual movie,are you moronic
Nobody wants to see two dudes kissing. Like sure, every dude should kiss his homies goodnight, but that's different. We say 'no homo' before our tongues intertwine. Anyone who just flaunts their sexuality has the appeal of a frat boy.
>yeah, dude, i was totally porking this chick with my dick!
Is equivalent to
>actually, I'm a bisexualy polyamorous blah blah i like penis
That shit is whack
>make movie aimed at best to 4% of the population
>wonder why people might not go to see it
huh
Will normal people* go see bros?
Reminder you WILL pay to watch the movie or you will be labeled a BIGOT! Women will now quiz you on the content of the movie and if they find out you didn't see it they will NOT frick you.
So, why aren't women watching this movie?
Women only pretend to like homosexuals. Its gross for them too.
Frick, I'm a homophobic normie, I guess I should go see it now...
MANY straight people feel disgusted in a literal, visceral way about homosexuality.
guys who pretend to be super cool with gay stuff and like "im queer" because they like tomboy chicks or whatever are so fricking pathetic
be gay whatever, noone cares, except for the "omg im soo stoked that ur gay man thats so based" guys
I can watch women licking each other’s pussies all day but the second two dudes’ lips touch each other I feel physically sick. This is because I’m normal.
As a straight man, gay "romance" disgusts me. I can stomach all kinds of stuff but the second two men start kissing i feel like throwing up. I have a theory that if men kissing doesn't make you sick to your stomach, you're at least bisexual. There is no in between.
Why do they not understand that there is nothing appealing about this to straight men? Gay sex is at the top of my list of revolting sexual acts just below necrophilia.
We will look back on this age of LGBT acceptance with disdain and disgust.
LOL straight men don't even watch straight romantic comedies why would they watch a gay romantic comedy