Why does everyone in the normalverse always brings up captain Kirk as a ham but never captain sisko
![]() CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
![]() |
![]() CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Why does everyone in the normalverse always brings up captain Kirk as a ham but never captain sisko
![]() CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
![]() |
![]() CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Normies know kirk and spock and wasn't there a bald guy? Take me to your leader.
Yeah Picard or whatever the next generation captain
Kirk is the guy who fights Dark Vader, right? And he has a robot named Chewing Tobacco.
Normies barely watched Star Trek and only know the original iconic crew from references mostly.
Because only spergs watched DS9. Hence your socially moronic question.
Ds9 rocks you nerd
>watch DS9
>call anyone else a nerd
Yes
So you understand the hypocrisy.
Yes, and I’m fine with it. I’m also trans btw
No
What was the bit you liked the most? The cuckening of Worf? The crippled looking homosexual with the facial paralysis who was the "Captain"? Shit, the only good thing about this entire shart-splatter was the Kardassians, and they are in it less than they they should be. Go on, big guy. Tell us why anytone would want to waste their time on a shit Cheers spinoff.
vee keeps making these fake ds9 vs. voy fandom war threads because it got bored of pretending to be a nutrek shill
Who is this vee?
Yes who is vee
Because
> It's another Jake and Sisko episode
you'll post this 27 more times I'm sure.
Yes.
> It's another Worf gets cucked episode.
Plz make it stop.
Why aren't you doing the In Trek News! bit every thread anymore
all of star trek is hammy as frick. especially teh captains. imho picard is the worst with his pretentiousness played off seriously. at least the sisko actor knew he was being an overly dramatic cartoon character. same with janeway, kirk, and jonathan archer. they all hammed it up on purpose. picard though, is just a homosexual being a homosexual pretending to be an intellectual who actually thought he gave a convincing, realistic portrayal. the rest of the captain actors all knew it was all a joke. but patrick stewart delusionally thinks he is one of the greatest actors of all time.
> Sisko is better than Picard and Janeway.
Look, it's bad enough you're black. Do you really need to embarrass yourself any further?
>> Sisko is better than Picard and Janeway.
where did i say sisko is better than janeway?
janeway, sisko, kirk, and archer all played their characters like cartoon characters. on purpose. because the shows were goofy. i didnt compare them at all except to say they were better actors than patrick stewart, who is the most cringe and horrible actor in all of star trek.
Instead of starting another a different start trek thread I'll hijack this one
How are black Vulcans a thing? Yellow, brown, red et cetrea Vulcans exist to?
I don't get it
Get back on the auction block.
I'm not at that episode yet, don't make me skip ahead to watch it
Sisko had an excuse for being a ham, he was partially an insane wormhole alien. Kirk was just a dude.
worf is a shitty character played by a shitty actor. the character is pathetic and immoral and deserves to get cucked again and again and see his house fall into ruin and his son turned into a homosexual and die without honor. anyone who thinks worf didnt get what he deserved is a homosexual who likes black men with huge foreheads.
Why is worf the only Klingon that wears his hair in a braid? Seem feminine
It's also canon that worf, and I guess all klingons, has a tiny penis
Hairy Vulcan girls
You know the answer.
Kirk was never as hammy as the pop culture image of Kirk you think you remember. Not until the movies, where it cyclically influenced itself.
Sisko being a constant rage ball was exciting and hilarious. Kirk chewing the scenery like a beaver is campy in its own right. Not sure what problem you're suffering from or why it's making you so unhappy today.
He wasn't just a ham, he was the whole pig
But enough about you
Sisko the kind of dude who inserts punctuation you can hear after every word
1
1
1