Why doesn't Hollywood make a movie about actual black history? What were black people doing before slavery? Huh?

Why doesn't Hollywood make a movie about actual black history? What were black people doing before slavery? Huh? Huh? Huh?

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >What were black people doing before slavery?
    enslaving each other

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ghezo my homie

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >African tribe called da homie
      you can't make this shit up

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Shaka Zulu is a great miniseries.
      Could probably do something pretty cool about the history of Ethiopia.
      If they felt really brave, maybe something about the Sudanese fighting off the first Caliphate.

      This is something that makes "The Woman King" even funnier. They made a movie about the most brutal slaver state of the region/era, and portrayed them as reluctant participants and aspiring abolitionists. Genuinely hilarious revisionism. I recall hearing it described as a bit like making a movie about Robert E. Lee, where at the end he kills all the plantation owners and frees the slaves.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I've heard some Southerners coping about how Robert E. Lee would have eventually pushed the Confederate States (who only seceded for State's rights) to abandon Slavery since he found it distasteful

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          now break it down by race

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous
            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              west virginia must be fricking disgusting

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It is
                >t. west virginian

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's like a whole different world. the land is beautiful but most of the people are every stereotype of hillbilly and trailer trash combined.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I didn't think it was that much different from Ohio or Pennsylvania

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Pennsylvania and Ohio are shit holes. I’ve never been to West Virginia but from what I gather it’s more green, mountainous and not overdeveloped to shit like the other two. I assume the weather is better too. The cold turns everything to shit in PA and OH.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I’ve never been to West Virginia but from what I gather it’s more green, mountainous and not overdeveloped

                ?feature=shared

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It is
                >t. west virginian

                It's like a whole different world. the land is beautiful but most of the people are every stereotype of hillbilly and trailer trash combined.

                t.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >if you don't like fat trailer trash blob women you are a israeli troony communist

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous
            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              CaliCHADS win again. Seethe, cope and eat more fatties lmao

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              what makes beaners in tennessee especially fat?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                eating

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              They really are dragging us to such an ugly boring hell, would probably ready the rope if it weren’t for the silver lining of cute asian girls. Also always very funny to me how it’s only black women that get shit for being fat while homies are tiptoed around.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >no sufficient sample
              makes me want to move to montana

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Here's the real mindfrick

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Fricking image didn't upload

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I wonder why this is the case. Is it because they have to walk up steeper terrain more often, or is it because of lower oxygen concentrations? Or something else?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                More hilly = smaller towns. And certain type of people

                tend to stay away from smaller towns and migrate towards larger cities.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Is it because they have to walk up steeper terrain more often
                Yes, I often visit a very hilly city for months at a time and when I'm there my TDEE is markedly higher, I can eat 2500 Kcals a day and lose some weight whereas when I stay in the flat city it's more around 2000

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Fricking image didn't upload

                It's because contaminants in the water supply that frick with human metabolism all concentrate into the water in the flattest, most low elevation areas, which is also where all the water from the Midwest eventually flows into the Gulf

                In the Western US, the red spots are almost all huge Indian reservation land, and they just have higher obesity rates because their genes don't mix well with a modern diet. plus the sheer amount of poverty in those places.

                But yeah as other anons pointed out, people in states with a lot of mountains tend to just be more active in general. So you couple a sedentary lifestyle with all the goyslop industrial HRt chemicals getting into the water supply and you got states like Louisiana where every other frick is wheeling around on a mobility scooter.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's the air and more specifically the higher CO2 concentration. High CO2 speeds up the metabolic rate and makes cellular respiration more efficient.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's not really coping, he did detest the institution of slavery. The Founding Fathers did as well. Thomas Jefferson spent his life trying to figure out how to end slavery without fricking the country up. He died before he came to a good solution and then Lincoln ended it in the most reckless way possible, basically the opposite of what Jefferson was trying to think through.
          >I can say with conscious truth that there is not a man on earth who would sacrifice more than I would, to relieve us from this heavy reproach, in any practicable way. the cession of that kind of property, for so it is misnamed, is a bagatelle which would not cost me in a second thought, if, in that way, a general emancipation and expatriation could be effected: and, gradually, and with due sacrifices, I think it might be. but, as it is, we have the wolf by the ear, and we can neither hold him, nor safely let him go. justice is in one scale, and self-preservation in the other.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Lincoln ended it in the most reckless way possible
            By the time Lincoln ended slavery almost every slave state was in open rebellion anyway. He had pretty much nothing to lose from it other than pissing off a few copperheads, and everything to gain (such as potentially triggering slave uprisings in the South, and getting European powers firmly on the Union's side).

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >By the time Lincoln ended slavery almost every slave state was in open rebellion anyway.
              And he was in a war to reclaim them and admit them back into the Union. He wasn't oblivious to the issues this would cause but he was overly hopeful that they would resolve on their own with no plan in place to prevent the obvious problems that would result.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Thomas Jefferson spent his life trying to figure out how to end slavery without fricking the country up
            The frick do you mean by this? How could ending slavery possible "frick the country up", the only thing that would have been fricked is the wealth of the upper society and the other founding fathers. Society would have been fine, better even if slavery wasn't around.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              > How could ending slavery possible "frick the country up"
              You can't just let loose millions of unassimilable, alien people into the territory and expect everything to work out. The prevailing view among abolitionists was freeing the slaves gradually and also repatriating them to their own separate country. The American Colonization Society was founded by George Washington's nephew to create a homeland for freed blacks. They established the colony of Liberia in West Africa, which was essentially the same as America but meant for black people to return to, populated by blacks with an Americanized culture and lead by black leaders who were educated in the US. This would have spared Americans over a century of racial turmoil.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Liberia
                the place that's in a continuous state war and turmoil, where cannibalism is a way of life?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's what it turned into, yeah. It started out no worse off than the American colonies did.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No you’re thinking of Chicago. Easy mistake to make

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Liberia in the 1700s.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Horseshit, there were plenty of jobs to be had so "letting them lose" would have worked itself out. With no slavery around there would also be a lot more solidarity between races as white and blacks are now on the same level when it comes to finding jobs.
                >This would have spared Americans over a century of racial turmoil.
                So would not having slavery

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >would have worked itself out
                >With no slavery around there would also be a lot more solidarity between races as white and blacks are now on the same level when it comes to finding jobs.
                this wishy washy thinking is what gave the EU the migrant disaster. Even the architect of that shit, Merkel admitted she fricked up, that's why they hide her from the public eye now.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Horseshit, there were plenty of jobs to be had so "letting them lose" would have worked itself out.
                Letting them loose is what happened and clearly that didn't work out. The problems still exist today, perhaps worse than ever. It caused disunion, a splintering of the American identity, and countless social problems that persist no matter how much of our time and resources we dedicate to it.
                Another Jefferson quote:
                >Why not retain and incorporate the blacks into the state, and thus save the expence of supplying, by importation of white settlers, the vacancies they will leave? Deep rooted prejudices entertained by the whites; ten thousand recollections, by the blacks, of the injuries they have sustained; new provocations; the real distinctions which nature has made; and many other circumstances, will divide us into parties, and produce convulsions which will probably never end but in the extermination of the one or the other race.
                He said this in 1785.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The problems still exist today
                Because you frickers had racism, because you still have racism.
                >He said this in 1785.
                Sure he did, he also said
                >The Germans are a filthy lot and should we wiped out before they ever reach our glorious Nation.

                show me which sub saharan nation invented writing

                >Ethiopia
                >Aksum
                >Mali
                >Benin

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >>Mali

                non of these countries invented writing before the white people showed up. post examples of writing from any of those nations from before european contact. fricking benin of all places lived in fricking neolithic walled cities that the yuros thought north africans built because stone age tech was seen as too advanced for the africans

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The frick you mean by "post examples"?

                >Because you frickers had racism, because you still have racism

                News flash: every society on the face of the earth “has racism”, stupid ESL

                Not institutional, you made it a core part of your society

                >Because you frickers had racism, because you still have racism.
                There doesn't seem to be any successful way of dealing with race and racism. It is a natural dividing factor in humans. Whoever you want to put the blame on, the fact is that it's a major problem with no solution.
                >he also said >The Germans are a filthy lot and should we wiped out before they ever reach our glorious Nation.
                No he didn't. You're acting childish now.

                >There doesn't seem to be any successful way of dealing with race and racism
                Defeatism

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Defeatism
                Maybe, but if the top brains for hundreds of years couldn't figure it out, and even today's politicians are ripping their hair out over it as the problem seems to get worse each year, what other conclusion is there? You have to work within the framework of human nature

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Here's the only conclusion to draw: They didn't try, the top brains didn't try to solve it. In fact they saw to exploit it and benefit from it
                >today's politicians are ripping their hair out over it as the problem seems to get worse each year,
                Because the other side is actively working against them, the ones who are racist and in power. The people who look at a statue of traitor and say "this is my history and heritage"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Here's the only conclusion to draw: They didn't try,
                What, nobody, ever? It was a major issue with the power to destroy the nation. Of course they tried to prevent that. They tried segregating people, they tried integrating people, they passed anti-discrimination laws, they even passed pro-discrimination laws in blacks' favor. It's the main platform of the progressive party today and still nobody can keep us from having regular race riots, civil rights protests, demands for "equity" and reparations, fundamental cultural clashes that can't find compromise, etc

                From the angle of
                >Dont' post a quote without a source
                [...]
                Everyone

                >From the angle of >Dont' post a quote without a source
                Is that the only problem? Okay, have the source
                https://www.nps.gov/liho/learn/historyculture/peoriaspeech.htm
                >Before proceeding, let me say I think I have no prejudice against the Southern people. They are just what we would be in their situation. If slavery did not now exist amongst them, they would not introduce it. If it did now exist amongst us, we should not instantly give it up. This I believe of the masses north and south.
                >When southern people tell us they are no more responsible for the origin of slavery, than we; I acknowledge the fact. When it is said that the institution exists; and that it is very difficult to get rid of it, in any satisfactory way, I can understand and appreciate the saying. I surely will not blame them for not doing what I should not know how to do myself. If all earthly power were given me, I should not know what to do, as to the existing institution.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >they even passed pro-discrimination laws in blacks' favor. It's the main platform of the progressive party today and still nobody
                No they didn't and the fact that you think that means you're too far gone already.

                >This is an image of the Ethiopia Healing scrolls, they are about 2000 years old.
                that book was made in 1750 you hotep ass moron
                https://blogs.bl.uk/asian-and-african/2017/12/a-handbook-of-ethiopian-magic-incantations-and-talisman-art-.html
                https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/ethiopian-magical-recipe-book/UgFAT5BfomYrrA?hl=en
                Portuagal had a fricking embassy in ethiopia 250 years before that book was written you lying dickless moron

                https://library.princeton.edu/special-collections/sites/default/files/Ethiopic_Combined.pdf

                Notice all the works from the 17th century, and the writings on the image I post bears no resemblance to any writing system found in Europe. So why then do you think Europeans thought Etophia how to write? But fine, I made a mistake because I read a source wrong so here's an stone monument from the 4th century.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >But fine, I made a mistake because I read a source wrong
                because you can't read
                >so here's an stone monument from the 4th century.
                >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ezana_Stone
                > These liturgical epigraphs were written in various ancient languages, including the Ethiopian Semitic Ge'ez, the South Arabian Sabaean, and Greek.
                the stone has fricking Greek written on it you fricking moron. Not only does it have fricking greek on it, but it talks about the fricking Christian God in a writing system derived from israeli
                you are a literal moron, which does make you the world's smartest black man

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No because I read this article
                https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/heal/hd_heal.htm

                And this part
                >Healing scrolls are written in Ge’ez, a 2,000-year-old indigenous Semitic language
                And my brain rewrote that to "these scrolls are 2000 years old".

                But you are just moving the goalpost, I gave you a stone 4th century and that still isn't enough for you. You claim that never had writing yet when presented with writing you push back. Yes it has Greek on it, it also has Geʽez and Sabaean on it. Shit if we're looking at that things that way then I guess Europeans never figured out writing either until the superior middle eastern civilizations thought those savage Europeans how to act civilized. While Germans and Italians fricked wolves in the ass the glorious Babylonian built towers to the heavens

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What did you think Semitic meant?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I said pre european contact. if there is greek on the stone it can't be preyuropean
                plus the language on the stone is literally derived from israeli. I want to see a black language invented by blacks without any whites or israelites

                wrong, phonecians were black, intermediate phenotypes are a products of misgenation that was spearheaded by romans and came to head when the white slave trade occured for almost 1000 years, the women were used in systematc harems and their wombs were put to work

                >more reddit spacing
                they weren't. they were from arabia, not subsaharan africa. you are just doing moronic kangs shit

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                as i said, arab isnt a race, you are referring to an amalgamation that doesnt reflect the ancient world

                you might as well be showing me a mexican

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                mexicans are literally just indians. the phonecians weren't black, they knew how to read

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                modern mexicans are triracial, same as modern arabs, a fractured idenitty through the exchnage of of blood

                phonecians are black

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >reddit spacing
                they literally weren't. they were not subsarharan. you are just >we waz kangsing because blacks have no history

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                if "sub sharaha" had a white slave trade that lasted a 1000 years than it would resemble north africa

                youre referring to another mans nut

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it's time to stop posting

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >>here's an stone monument from the 4th century.

                >The Ezana Stone is an ancient stele still standing in modern-day Axum in Ethiopia, the centre of the ancient Kingdom of Aksum.
                >From AD 330 to 356, King Ezana ruled the ancient Kingdom of Aksum centred in the Horn of Africa. He fought against the Nubians, and commemorated his victories on stone tablets in praise of God. These liturgical epigraphs were written in various ancient languages, including the Ethiopian Semitic Ge'ez, the South Arabian Sabaean, and Greek.
                lol

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                no bro, you don't understand, the black etheopians invented greek

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Not institutional, you made it a core part of your society

                As opposed to who else?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The frick you mean by "post examples"?
                you said those countries had writing before yuropean contact. post examples of the writings you moron. like how gilgamesh is an example of Mesopotamia writing or the The oracle bone inscriptions are early chinaman writings. what written works or stories were made by those countries before the yuros got there? none, because no black nation ever invented writing before yuro contact

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                This is an image of the Ethiopia Healing scrolls, they are about 2000 years old.

                >Everyone

                Right. America is famously the only country in the world to have practiced slavery.

                You can't even follow the conversation, I said that America are unique in the sense that they made institutional racism. In all other societies racism was not written into law, you wrote racism into your laws. You wrote it into how your society is run and manages

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >This is an image of the Ethiopia Healing scrolls, they are about 2000 years old.
                that book was made in 1750 you hotep ass moron
                https://blogs.bl.uk/asian-and-african/2017/12/a-handbook-of-ethiopian-magic-incantations-and-talisman-art-.html
                https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/ethiopian-magical-recipe-book/UgFAT5BfomYrrA?hl=en
                Portuagal had a fricking embassy in ethiopia 250 years before that book was written you lying dickless moron

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >In all other societies racism was not written into law, you wrote racism into your laws

                Ok then genius, give me some examples of countries that haven’t done this.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >China
                >England
                >Ottomans

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                China
                >who are the Uyghurs
                England
                >what is the Royal African Company
                Ottomans
                >what is the Armenian Genocide

                Ah, yes, who could forget the paragons of racial and ethnic hegemony that were / are the Chinese, English and Ottomans?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                But none of that was written into law, they had discrimination but the English parliament never wrote into law
                >Blacks are not allowed to near white people, if a black man touches a white person he must die

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Blacks weren't even part of England. They didn't have to make laws regarding race like the US did because they didn't have millions of people of a different race in their country.
                Segregation laws were there for the safety and satisfaction of both groups. Segregation ended and now we have riots whenever a white police officer arrests the wrong colored criminal.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Segregation laws were there for the safety and satisfaction of both groups.
                Segregation laws was there to keep one group down and elevate the other.
                >Segregation ended and now we have riots whenever a white police officer arrests the wrong colored criminal.
                Because your police has shown time and time again to be horribly corrupt and incompetent, pic related.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                squirrels are neat

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Cops are terrified of them

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Segregation laws was there to keep one group down and elevate the other.
                By definition it's equal to both groups. If it's good for one, it's good for the other.
                >Because your police has shown time and time again to be horribly corrupt and incompetent
                Okay, so you'd want your own segregated police force made up of your people, right? So that only black officers would interact with black suspects. Police racism instantly solved, right?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >By definition it's equal to both groups
                So why then has it always been used to push down one group and elevating another? Blacks in America didn't benefit from segregation laws
                >so you'd want your own segregated police force made up of your people
                I want them to clean up their act, to increase training, to learn how to engage with people, to learn that violence is a last resort.

                Could be argued that police shouldn't even be armed, because an armed police is going to violate the fifth amendment.

                I’m not even going to engage anymore if you think Africa is the US’s fault and not England, Germany, Belgium, France or Portugal’s. Whatever shithole you or your parents are from that the US either bombed or funded the bombing for, I will lose no sleep tonight knowing that country deserved it in full.

                Never said it was, only South Africa.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >So why then has it always been used to push down one group and elevating another? Blacks in America didn't benefit from segregation laws
                It hasn't been. The two peoples were segregated and black people, in their own communities, did not thrive the way white people did. This is not a fault of segregation but of the efforts and abilities of the black community. When integrated, black people are still below white people on the socioeconomic ladder, so would you say integration is a means to keep them down?
                >I want them to clean up their act, to increase training, to learn how to engage with people, to learn that violence is a last resort.
                You'd be at odds with BLM's "defund the police" movement then, and all this would do is take a police force that already works fine for white and asian people and make them generally less effective and sacrifice their own safety in order to make them more compatible with the black community.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >did not thrive the way white people did
                Because they were segregated and not given the same rights or opportunist as white people
                >You'd be at odds with BLM's "defund the police" movement then,
                No I am perfectly in line with movement. The point I ask is the same points that BLM makes, defend the police. Why do they need military gear? Why are police driving around in heavily armoured vehicles meant for war zones, why are they given military weapons and gear. Why are they playing military when they don't get the same training or rule of engagement as military?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Because they were segregated
                If one group is segregated, so is the other. It's not something you "do" to one group. Again, when segregated they didn't thrive as whites did, and when integrated they don't thrive as whites do. So which is the oppressive act? Hell, there are whole countries with virtually all black populations. They aren't renowned for their high standards of living, so would it be better for them to have a bunch of whites move in and incorporate themselves into their society and government?
                >No I am perfectly in line with movement. The point I ask is the same points that BLM makes, [defund] the police.
                Well, you can't increase training and job performance and also spend less money. You can't make the job more dangerous and more frustrating and specialized while paying them less. There's already a recruiting crisis even with extra financial incentives being offered.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If groups are segregated then they aren't equals, if they aren't equal then they aren't given the same chance to advance in society. Again looking at America, how can groups be equal if the white government that ruled the nations if they are telling all the non-whites "you aren't allowed to be a full part of this nation". How can groups be equals if black didn't even have the freedom to choose where to sit in the bus?
                >all black populations. They aren't renowned for their high standards of living
                Same with white nations, why are the Balkans such shit holes? Why is Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, Russia, Latvia, Portugal such shit holes

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >If groups are segregated then they aren't equals
                What sense does that make? It's essentially leaving both groups alone to do their own thing. The outcomes between groups might differ, but that's the same as between any two individuals not legally tethered to each other. With integration, we still have unrest over civil rights, and equity policies are deemed necessary to balance the natural inequalities between groups in an integrated society.
                The simplest example is of public water fountains. If you have a whites-only water fountain and a blacks-only water fountain, and the blacks let their water fountain get grimy and dirty while the whites keep theirs in good working condition, can you really point to that and say whites doomed blacks to having filthy water fountains? It's not much different than an integrated city with a black majority. Things fall into disrepair, opportunities are not created, corruption is high, people aren't safe. It's not the system that matters then.
                >Same with white nations, why are the Balkans such shit holes? Why is Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, Russia, Latvia, Portugal such shit holes
                I won't argue with that, but that wasn't my point. If you believe blacks living separately from whites is bad for them and can be considered a malicious act by whites, does that mean you favor colonization? There's a strong case to be made for it opening up opportunities, bringing industry and development, etc. Of course just as American integrated society does, this removes some autonomy, but is colonization worse than segregation?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Fine, good for England. We’ll ignore them colonizing 3/4ths of the planet since that apparently doesn’t register for you. What do you call Apartheid in South Africa? The Pass Laws? How about the Chinese Exclusion Act in Canada? How about the Identity Card system in Rwanda? Or all the land restriction laws in half of fricking Africa during the 19th and 20th centuries? Do I need to go on or are you going to continue to say the US is the ONLY society that codified racism?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >We’ll ignore them colonizing 3/4ths of the planet since that apparently doesn’t register for you
                It does but that's a separate matter
                >What do you call Apartheid in South Africa? The Pass Laws? How about the Chinese Exclusion Act in Canada? How about the Identity Card system in Rwanda?
                All inspired by the USA and things I forgot. They saw you write racism into law so they followed your example. So I was in the wrong, the USA are not the only one who wrote racism into law. But you are the first ones to do it, so they all drew inspiration from you. Lets also not forget the Nazis, also inspired by the USA

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I’m not even going to engage anymore if you think Africa is the US’s fault and not England, Germany, Belgium, France or Portugal’s. Whatever shithole you or your parents are from that the US either bombed or funded the bombing for, I will lose no sleep tonight knowing that country deserved it in full.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the entire foundarion of our contemporary writing system is founded off the phonecians whom were black

                euro culture is just a exportation bestowed unto swine people

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Phonecians were semites bro

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                phnecicians were black

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                phnecicians were black

                >reddit spacing
                the phonecians were semities/north africans/arabs, not blacks. wrong side of the sahara, moron

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                phonecians were black

                they started the white slave trade that obfuscated the phenotype of the region

                "arab" isnt a race, they are mutts, largely a product of the modern era

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >reddit spacing
                >more moronation
                they look like modern day lebanese. they have like 90% the same SNPs as lebanese, they weren't black

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                wrong, phonecians were black, intermediate phenotypes are a products of misgenation that was spearheaded by romans and came to head when the white slave trade occured for almost 1000 years, the women were used in systematc harems and their wombs were put to work

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Ethiopia
                >Aksum
                >Mali
                >Benin

                Opulent

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                post the real pics next time

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Because you frickers had racism, because you still have racism

                News flash: every society on the face of the earth “has racism”, stupid ESL

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Because you frickers had racism, because you still have racism.
                There doesn't seem to be any successful way of dealing with race and racism. It is a natural dividing factor in humans. Whoever you want to put the blame on, the fact is that it's a major problem with no solution.
                >he also said >The Germans are a filthy lot and should we wiped out before they ever reach our glorious Nation.
                No he didn't. You're acting childish now.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Because you frickers had racism, because you still have racism.
                There doesn't seem to be any successful way of dealing with race and racism. It is a natural dividing factor in humans. Whoever you want to put the blame on, the fact is that it's a major problem with no solution.
                >he also said >The Germans are a filthy lot and should we wiped out before they ever reach our glorious Nation.
                No he didn't. You're acting childish now.

                Another Lincoln quote

                > My first impulse would be to free all the slaves, and send them to Liberia,---to their own native land. But a moment's reflection would convince me, that whatever of high hope, (as I think there is) there may be in this, in the long run, its sudden execution is impossible. If they were all landed there in a day, they would all perish in the next ten days; and there are not surplus shipping and surplus money enough in the world to carry them there in many times ten days. What then? Free them all, and keep them among us as underlings? Is it quite certain that this betters their condition? I think I would not hold one in slavery, at any rate; yet the point is not clear enough for me to denounce people upon. What next? Free them, and make them politically and socially, our equals? My own feelings will not admit of this; and if mine would, we well know that those of the great mass of white people will not. Whether this feeling accords with justice and sound judgment, is not the sole question, if indeed, it is any part of it. A universal feeling, whether well or ill-founded, can not be safely disregarded. We can not, then, make them equals. It does seem to me that systems of gradual emancipation might be adopted; but for their tardiness in this, I will not undertake to judge our brethren of the south.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Another Lincoln quote
                >My greatest mistake was telling Sherman to stop and not hanging all the confederate leader on the highest tree, the traitors deserve death and nothing more.

                I owe you nothing.

                If you're too stupid to read your own REAL history to begin with and take responsibility for being of that race that INVENTED SLAVERY TO BEGIN WITH.

                Then why place the burden on me or any other purchaser of black slaves back then?

                You sound like a prostitute that cries about the patriarchy, after taking some guy's money to begin with.

                >take responsibility for being of that race that INVENTED SLAVERY TO BEGIN WITH
                I'm not Greek

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm trying to level with you. Where are you coming from?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                From the angle of
                >Dont' post a quote without a source

                >Not institutional, you made it a core part of your society

                As opposed to who else?

                Everyone

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Everyone

                Right. America is famously the only country in the world to have practiced slavery.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The more I learn about Thomas Jefferson the more I learn about how much foresight and open-mindedness he had. My favorite thing I've learned about him is that he wanted a remapping of the constitution every 2 decades to compensate for new shaping in political/social landscapes. No one took him seriously on that specific point apparently. If we followed that to its conclusion today we wouldn't be seeing the kind of corruption we've grown used to.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >This would have spared Americans over a century of racial turmoil.
                More than a century considering the turmoil continues til this very day and for the foreseeable future.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Genuinely hilarious revisionism.

        First time watching a historical Hollywood movie?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There is some historical basis for it. Not to the degree the movie goes to, but even then it’s largely one person advocating it personally, and it involves her daughter being kidnapped and almost sold to the west.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The government of Benin officially protested against Woman King and its revisionist portrayal of Dahomey.

        But nobody cares what Africans have to say.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Ghezo, King of Dahomey
      >Dahomey

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Reminder Woman Kang was about these guys and took the position of "Slavery and Human sacrifice good if whitey say it bad"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lmfao why the hell that homie wearing that gay ass hat, is he gay? lmfao.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The fake black history thing is a tool of the israelites to trash white history, not to represent actual black history.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this is what they look like to me, its uncanny and unsettling, makes it impossible to relax

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this is a homosexual erectus that predates our species, let alone the modern Sub Saharan African races

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they have 20% homosexual erectus DNA, its an open secret

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ...so? Do you not understand genetics, phenotypes, or genotypes? You're taught what this is in elementary school.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No Ivan you aren't. No Ivan seeing some bullshit pol info graphic doesn't mean you understand.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You know all humans have 100% homosexual erectus ancestry right

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What's the difference with a Black?

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    an older pre woke documentary i saw about homosexual erectus presented evidence that homosexual erectus continued until long after it was previously thought to have died out, the evidence was the 20% admixture found in modern sub saharan africans, which proves homosexual erectus lived alongside modern humans rather than becoming extinct prior to their emergence, they won't specify the DNA source in more recent productions other than calling the 20% 'ghost DNA', implying they don't know where it came from, but they do know, it came from homosexual erectus, it's how they know how long homosexual erectus existed for before extinction

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the true world already ended, they just casted a massive genjustu spell to encompass the kali yuga where they manage bipedal pigs (npcs) to trample human affairs and terraform the current dark age

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      clown world started a long time ago and this divine comedy...the writers purveyors of honk

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      is this something to be accelerated or prevented with all one's might

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Pucci family
      Heh

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        heheheh

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      bucci family

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not everyone played Age of Empires II like us OP.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >a few of its central roles were inspired by actual accounts of Agojie women;
    >Mbedu's adolescent character Nawi was known as one of the last of the Agojie warriors, who passed away in 1979 at over 100 years in age

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >inspired by actual accounts

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Whoopie Goldberg finally got her statue? Good for her - she is a queen

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because they didn't how to read or write? The only history they have is spoken word from past generations.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    every russian man's fantasy

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Africa was like Wakanda until the Europeans showed up with their muskets and sabers and conquered them, somehow.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      das rite!
      we wuz superpowers conqueered by da primitive whitey!

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    black history be like
    >1500 AD: members of the mumbuti mumbuti tribe armed with spears and bows go to war with the watombo tribe and cannibalize the defeated warriors along with small children in a ritual for good fortune in the next war, the rest are enslaved
    >2024 AD: members of the mumbuti mumbuti tribe armed with spears and ak47 rifles go to war with the watombo tribe and cannibalize the defeated warriors along with small children in a ritual for good fortune in the next war, the rest are enslaved

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >What were black people doing before slavery? Huh? Huh? Huh?
    Crashing the Egyptian economy
    With some survivors

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Whenever they do you still throw a temper tantrum because someone made a movie that doesn't pander to you specifically.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >What were black people doing before slavery?
    no one knows
    >be black
    >never invent writing
    >don't record any of your fricking history at all as oral tradition
    >white people show up
    >teach you to write
    >still don't fricking record any of your history and we need to rely on accounts of white people even though blacks learned to write
    seriously, african and australian history was so fricking boring even africans and austrlians don't care

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Be black
      >Have a writing system
      >Have written history older then anything found in Europe

      >Whites still think you can't write

      >Liberia
      the place that's in a continuous state war and turmoil, where cannibalism is a way of life?

      Yes it's amazing what the CIA can do to destabilize a nation

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        show me which sub saharan nation invented writing

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Queen Kandake of Ethiopia. The only ruler that made Alexander the Great second guess his strategy when she met him on top of a war elephant and met her armies against his. Rumor is he would rather march in to Egypt than face Kushite armies and be decimated facing a humiliating a defeat at the hands of a woman.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >and be decimated facing a humiliating a defeat at the hands of a woman
      this is a history thread not a fan fiction thread

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dishonest southern lardass, cutting off the quote
      >My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or destroy Slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that
      Lincoln wanted to end slavery through legal, constitutional means, but this goal was entirely secondary to saving the union. That's why the emancipation declaration came so late in the war, and the legal justification for that was that the Confederates had seceded and so the constitution didn't apply to them. The union states which had slavery were unaffected. Plus, Lincoln actually did end slavery and was the POTUS, Lee just said some sentimental jibber jabber that amounted to nothing.

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    > What were black people doing before slavery?
    they were getting mowed down

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The Zulu war happened after the abolition of slavery in most of the world though

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Zulu Dawn
      That's the one where the bongs get slaughtered like the gammons they are, chud. You're supposed to post ZULU to feel superior on the merits of people with decently lighter skin than yours

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >black hands typed this shitpost

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Whiter than you, Skibidiah Muttington III

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No money in it, same reason why they don't make movie showing the confederate state for being the traitors that they are.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >what were black people doing before slavery
    look at rwanda genocide, what mugabe did to his "allies" after taking over rhodesia and the real dahomey empire
    hollywood would never want to air those things

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Cinemaphile
      >Doesn't know about the movie hotel Rwanda

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        they didnt show the genocide from either side of it, they showed an independant party

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >What were black people doing before slavery?
    Living the life instead of being wageslaves to the israelites

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >What were black people doing before slavery? Huh? Huh? Huh?

    Slaving their own kind.

    Most black people tend to ignore that piece of history, when warring tribes would enslave another tribe and sell them as slaves to whoever would barter with them... Arabs, European, British,...

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Meanwhile here you are ignoring the role that white people played in that trade, like how you created a much higher demand for slaves which leads to more conflict between groups in Africa to acquire more slaves so they could sell them to you.

      >would have worked itself out
      >With no slavery around there would also be a lot more solidarity between races as white and blacks are now on the same level when it comes to finding jobs.
      this wishy washy thinking is what gave the EU the migrant disaster. Even the architect of that shit, Merkel admitted she fricked up, that's why they hide her from the public eye now.

      >Migrant disaster
      Yes it was a mistake to allow the people of the Balkans to leave Yugoslavia, we should have forced them all back in. Same thing with the former USSR nations

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Meanwhile here you are ignoring the role that white people played in that trade, like how you created a much higher demand for slaves which leads to more conflict between groups in Africa to acquire more slaves so they could sell them to you.

        Who said I was ignoring anything?

        Every race practiced slavery in some form or another at one point during their own country's history. It's almost redundant to even gaslight on about who did what because those who actually can read history in proper context know it's a 'dog eat dog' world... Look at what St. Floyd did to a pregnant woman, high on crack? Did white people make him do that? Or his natural inclination to be a marauder attacking or exploiting his own kind?

        That said, you only have yourselves to blame no matter what. Maybe if your ancestors fought harder, then maybe your great-grandmother wouldn't have been my great-grandfather's personal frick toy in the cotton fields.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Who said I was ignoring anything?
          You did by how you were writing your earlier post

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I owe you nothing.

            If you're too stupid to read your own REAL history to begin with and take responsibility for being of that race that INVENTED SLAVERY TO BEGIN WITH.

            Then why place the burden on me or any other purchaser of black slaves back then?

            You sound like a prostitute that cries about the patriarchy, after taking some guy's money to begin with.

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    there will never be a historical kino about africa that doesn’t include “yt bad, noble tribesman good” anymore

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They were being Black folk.

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    most sub saharian african languages don't have a future tense
    sub saharian africa never invented the chair

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I’d watch a show pre-dynastic Egypt that led into the old kingdom. It’d have Nubians n shiet and it’d be great

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why doesn't Hollywood make a movie about actual black reality like Don't Be a Menace to South Central

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah African history is kino, they should make a movie about their mighty kingdoms like pic related.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Just breathtaking architecture, a true feat of human ingenuity.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine living in these times, just the majesty of the skyline of one of Africa's mightiest empires.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that's mos eisley

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      birmingham is a shit hole because of street shitters not spear chuckers though

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    when the rich white dude saw them picking bugs outta each other's hair he brought some back to his plantation and that's how picking cotton became the only thing they could do right

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *