Why don't cartoon animals have genitals or buttholes? We don't cover real animals so why censor cartoon ones? Even the Lion King remake, which was advertised as live action didn't have any.
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Why don't cartoon animals have genitals or buttholes? We don't cover real animals so why censor cartoon ones? Even the Lion King remake, which was advertised as live action didn't have any.
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
because it comes across as weird when you’re intentionally modelling these things rather than just recording them. a baby with genitals isn’t weird. making a doll for kids with a vegana and uterus is fricking odd
I bought a toy of a cat version of a character from Gundam and when it arrived I discovered they gave it a butthole.
proof?
that looks like peepoodo
Because no one besides absolute weirdos wants to see that. I'm guessing you're one of them.
Multiple reasons.
#1 is that people don't really WANT to see those things. Scooby Doo would be a lot weirder with his balls swinging around.
#2 is that everyone now knows that there are people out there very into this, called furries, who ruin animal characters for every normal person.
For the record though I think it's funny when they give animal characters a little x for their butthole, that's endearing.
>I think it's funny when they give animal characters a little x for their butthole, that's endearing.
Tuna Sandwich (the cat) in Kid Cosmic is a great example of this. It wasn't gratuitous or weird. It was just funny.
>For the record though I think it's funny when they give animal characters a little x for their butthole, that's endearing.
Yeah, you can usually get away with that, since it's always intended to be a joke, at least for Japan.
Because in cartoons there's limits & it's looks disgusting
Female animal genitalia is disgusting.
animal genitalia is disgusting and ruins porn
If you don't like the canine wiener, you don't understand what you're dealing with. It is the perfect organism. Its structural perfection is matched only by its hostility.
And what about the a female canine pussy then? What's good about that organism?
Nothing.
homosexual
Find god
God is just dog backwards.
Most sane Cinemaphile poster.
donut holes are great
Same reason cartoons don’t have arm or leg hair on any characters they aren’t trying to present as extra masculine. Even though everybody has it, it’s a minor detail that sticks out as aggressively intentional whenever you’re the exception that goes out of the way to put it in. And the implied intention behind drawing genitals when you don’t have to, is that you’re trying to sexualize something.
Marmalade is Missing:
that curvy stockinged lady looks like a snack
meanwhile in powerpuff girls
Felidae showed genitals. And the comic: https://files.catbox.moe/lcayqs.jpg
This movie tho was also very gruesome, had gore, and had one sex scene.
ITT: the intended audience for pic related
That butthole is gross.
I can see why they don't, but it weirds me a bit in certain other situations. Like for example, I find it's very common to see something where there's literal sex and human nudity and such for titillation or just casual nudity for realism but then for some reason animals and monsters that are fully naked and mammalian have got nothing at all even just casually and not in the sense of sex, in the same thing that had a bunch of human nudity and sex.
Because you ARE the dick/butthole.