Why don't cartoon animals have genitals or buttholes? We don't cover real animals so why censor cartoon ones?

Why don't cartoon animals have genitals or buttholes? We don't cover real animals so why censor cartoon ones? Even the Lion King remake, which was advertised as live action didn't have any.

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    because it comes across as weird when you’re intentionally modelling these things rather than just recording them. a baby with genitals isn’t weird. making a doll for kids with a vegana and uterus is fricking odd

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I bought a toy of a cat version of a character from Gundam and when it arrived I discovered they gave it a butthole.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      proof?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that looks like peepoodo

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because no one besides absolute weirdos wants to see that. I'm guessing you're one of them.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Multiple reasons.
    #1 is that people don't really WANT to see those things. Scooby Doo would be a lot weirder with his balls swinging around.
    #2 is that everyone now knows that there are people out there very into this, called furries, who ruin animal characters for every normal person.
    For the record though I think it's funny when they give animal characters a little x for their butthole, that's endearing.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I think it's funny when they give animal characters a little x for their butthole, that's endearing.
      Tuna Sandwich (the cat) in Kid Cosmic is a great example of this. It wasn't gratuitous or weird. It was just funny.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >For the record though I think it's funny when they give animal characters a little x for their butthole, that's endearing.
      Yeah, you can usually get away with that, since it's always intended to be a joke, at least for Japan.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because in cartoons there's limits & it's looks disgusting

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Female animal genitalia is disgusting.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      animal genitalia is disgusting and ruins porn

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If you don't like the canine wiener, you don't understand what you're dealing with. It is the perfect organism. Its structural perfection is matched only by its hostility.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          And what about the a female canine pussy then? What's good about that organism?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nothing.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              homosexual

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Find god

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            God is just dog backwards.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Most sane Cinemaphile poster.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        donut holes are great

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Same reason cartoons don’t have arm or leg hair on any characters they aren’t trying to present as extra masculine. Even though everybody has it, it’s a minor detail that sticks out as aggressively intentional whenever you’re the exception that goes out of the way to put it in. And the implied intention behind drawing genitals when you don’t have to, is that you’re trying to sexualize something.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Marmalade is Missing:

    [...]

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that curvy stockinged lady looks like a snack

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    meanwhile in powerpuff girls

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Felidae showed genitals. And the comic: https://files.catbox.moe/lcayqs.jpg

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This movie tho was also very gruesome, had gore, and had one sex scene.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ITT: the intended audience for pic related

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That butthole is gross.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can see why they don't, but it weirds me a bit in certain other situations. Like for example, I find it's very common to see something where there's literal sex and human nudity and such for titillation or just casual nudity for realism but then for some reason animals and monsters that are fully naked and mammalian have got nothing at all even just casually and not in the sense of sex, in the same thing that had a bunch of human nudity and sex.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because you ARE the dick/butthole.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *