escalation of standards. it's like how after a while stories often cant resist to keep making bigger and more powerful, universe threats instead of more grounded local level stuff.
>anon brings up a phenomenon that's happening because of the shit we but in our bodies >you:RePuBLiCaNs
Being a /misc/tard should ban you from being on any board but /misc/
>Why has the objectification of women gotten worse over the years?
Her cleavage is covered up now, can your shitposts at least make a semblance of sense?
Because almost everyone likes breasts, even women nowadays. There's no sexist conspiracy here. That's it. Blame biology. We like to see and draw boobs.
There's no such thing as "objectification", it's a meme concept invented by feminists that means nothing. There's also fewer sexy women in comics now that there ever was before, so the premise behind your post is false.
That timeline is dishonest because multiple artists have drawn her in their own way in each year represented.
Bolland wasn't the only person who drew her in 1992. Hughes wasn't the only person who drew her in 2000 (ironically, they only worked on the covers).
So fricking moronic.
Women are not objects, but fictional characters are objects. Fictional characters have no rights of their own and you can exploit them narrative or promotionally as you see fit, without a need to apologize over it.
Characters are tools, if the artist and the writer feel the need or desire to kill them or use them to titillate or thrill the audience that's within their rights, as they are not real people.
Judging their examples used, there seems to be an extreme overlap in the increase of boob size and the increase of character size on covers in general.
Hmm, I wonder what that could mean...
Between this and the Young Justice thread, I have a feeling Marvel and DC comics are not worth reading because it's made by people too obsessed with seething or making people seethe than write anything worthwhile.
This. They actually won. It's all gone and scrubbed out from mainstream Hollywood friendly media, yet when you point this out, people like OP post stuff from FOREIGN or NICHE media as if the existence of those means it's the majority of Mainstream media.
Women are not objects. Women are antiques, treasures, and occasionally artifacts if you’re feeling up to it.
My wives are the most sought after artifacts in the universe
>Women are not objects. Women are objects.
what
Oh yeah you've made the insides of comics awful, might as well make the outsides match.
>Busts that consume more then triple the cover space
How much of that is just having the character closer to the reader do you think?
100%
escalation of standards. it's like how after a while stories often cant resist to keep making bigger and more powerful, universe threats instead of more grounded local level stuff.
Females get bigger boobs earlier and earlier these days. It’s because of beef filled with steroids and oestrogen from plastics in the water supply
Wonder Woman is a victim of mans world
Why are republicans so obsessed with children's breasts?
You know damn well why.
What the frick? Rent free?
>anon brings up a phenomenon that's happening because of the shit we but in our bodies
>you:RePuBLiCaNs
Being a /misc/tard should ban you from being on any board but /misc/
>republicans
I got my period at 9(1997), shit's fricked.
Write some real fricking news
I think it's also that things have gotten my stylized as well.
Master Miller better be writing articles for DT now.
>more cover space means bigger boobs
brainlets
Love me some breasts
>Why has the objectification of women gotten worse over the years?
Her cleavage is covered up now, can your shitposts at least make a semblance of sense?
2000's is clearly the peak.
Its ironic, how can they become woker yet more sexist? Or are they using wokeness as a distraction to make their females hotter?
>Or are they using wokeness as a distraction to make their females hotter?
It's the opposite.
Because almost everyone likes breasts, even women nowadays. There's no sexist conspiracy here. That's it. Blame biology. We like to see and draw boobs.
There's no such thing as "objectification", it's a meme concept invented by feminists that means nothing. There's also fewer sexy women in comics now that there ever was before, so the premise behind your post is false.
That timeline is dishonest because multiple artists have drawn her in their own way in each year represented.
Bolland wasn't the only person who drew her in 1992. Hughes wasn't the only person who drew her in 2000 (ironically, they only worked on the covers).
So fricking moronic.
The real question is who drew the most busty WW?
Me.
Post.
I don't see the problem. stop being an outraged gay, it usually helps
It's been 0 days since a soiboi numale cuck pissed and shitted himself over cartoon boobs
>Oh no woman drawn with huge boobs, it's so unrealistic!!
Lynda still got at frickin' 70 years old.
Because it's what the readers want.
>cover space
What a moronic way to measure that. By that reasoning I'm sure male characters breasts have also grown.
Women are not objects, but fictional characters are objects. Fictional characters have no rights of their own and you can exploit them narrative or promotionally as you see fit, without a need to apologize over it.
Characters are tools, if the artist and the writer feel the need or desire to kill them or use them to titillate or thrill the audience that's within their rights, as they are not real people.
Judging their examples used, there seems to be an extreme overlap in the increase of boob size and the increase of character size on covers in general.
Hmm, I wonder what that could mean...
Can you believe women in comics are wearing less clothes since the 40s? This is all comic artists' fault!
>meanwhile every time I hear something about nightwing it's in regards to his ass
women are objects until proven otherwise
Between this and the Young Justice thread, I have a feeling Marvel and DC comics are not worth reading because it's made by people too obsessed with seething or making people seethe than write anything worthwhile.
>women have le boobs
>sometimes they have big boots
>some women like to dress in sexy outfits
that is absolutely sexist and transphobic
But there’s no such a thing like "objectification of women" in modern media.
This. They actually won. It's all gone and scrubbed out from mainstream Hollywood friendly media, yet when you point this out, people like OP post stuff from FOREIGN or NICHE media as if the existence of those means it's the majority of Mainstream media.
Because women won't stop objecting