Why is Batman able to bounce back from bad content better than other heroes?
There was one bad Green Lantern movie and it killed the character. Superman IV was bad and Superman didn’t get another movie for almost twenty years.
Batman has a couple bad movies, boom not even a decade later he’s back on top.
Batman V Superman sucked - Superman appeared in Justice League and nothing else after that besides incredibly minute cameos. Batman, the other half of the film, got a great reboot, two great reboots if you count Joker
Is it just pure popularity? He’s too big to fail? Bad movies, bad comics, bad cartoons, nothing sinks Batman
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
>Batman has a couple bad movies
Clearly you mean Catwoman because Batman has no bad movies.
You made this thread yesterday.
It's one guy, the same one who's been making all the Adam West Batman threads over the last few days. We're discussing it over on the other thread he made
Why are you all insisting I’m a bit or spammer or something? Check the archive
https://desuarchive.org/co/search/text/Why%20is%20Batman%20able%20to%20bounce%20back%20from%20bad%20content%20better%20than%20other%20heroes/
I literally wrote this thread just now, today, for the first time
This isn’t a repost
I’m mostly just salty we haven’t got another Superman movie, and that Green Lantern is so dead
Supposed to say “bot” not “bit,” sorry
Sorry, there's a lot of programmed autopost lately
Anyway is mostly money the real indicator, batman attract many kind of audience, superman less, green lantern even less etc
So there will be many more batman and spiderman movies
You hang out on Cinemaphile awhile, it gets really fricking easy to spot samegays, bots, shills, ect.
You might shuffle up the wording, but we know it's you.
Can you find me a post saying this but with different wording?
Cause I literally swear, I made this post just now. This isn’t spamming or anything
It obviously is you dumbass. You same image resolution and same thread starting opening with a dumb question.
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/131864498/
Based schizo
No I didn’t
>Why is Batman able to bounce back from bad content better than other heroes?
They will make that, is not "batman" doing this. even with "bad movies" the had good revenues and good receptions at the time, surely better than green lantern
still op is a bot
It's a chicken or egg thing. Batman is the only part of the DC brand that has been consistently profitable for Warner regardless of quality. So DC invests more in him than in other characters. Which allows him to bounce back better. Which leads him to invest more in him than other DC characters. repeat.
It also helps that Batman being a rich blue-state city boy makes him much easier to write for people from that bubble in a way that fits in more with their values of the world being a gross nihilistic place, as opposed to Superman a red-state farm boy who believes in yucky things like truth justice optimism and america being a good place.
>nothing sinks Batman
And this is why.
Literally me
Batman more consistently has good movies, both in critical and financial success. Even if one or two out of each series of films does badly, DC just has to look at the one or two big hits to justify trying again. I'm not aware of any big hits from green lantern and superman hasn't had a particularly successful movie in a while, so it's much harder to justify trying to bounce back.
I really hope Superman gets a good movie before I die
Didn’t mean to make that sound dramatic, I’m only 23 and I’m not dying anytime soon
I just hope it happens in my lifetime. I loved Superman so much as a kid. I hope when I have a kid, there will be some cool new Superman content we can watch together
We’ll always have George Reeves, of course. And Christopher Reeve. And collections of old comics. And the Fleischer cartoons. And STAS. I guess if my kid likes old movies…