>be miserable, jaded fuck >still got off his ass to see the new Alexander Payne Paul Giamatti drama
damn it feels good being a multitasker. The movie was nice too with excellent acting. This looks like pretty generic sci-fi from the guy who fumbled Godzilla.
That's really unfortunate because he is a much better director than Neil Blomkamp ever was. He actually has good films under his belt. This also is not anywhere near as bad as Chappie or Elysium
>a much better director than Neil Blomkamp ever was
low bar. remember how many hipsters thought District 9 was better than Avatar? not heard much from those retards lately.
avatar and district 9 are entirely different movies. they're just both scifi. weird comparison.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
The movie does have elements from both movies (and also from Elysium), particularly the bad ones: simpleton political onesidedness, condescendingly idealizing the poor, falling for the good savage myth, cardboard villains etc
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
district 9 is pretty morally grey. i haven't seen the movie in years but there were gangs and the alien never comes back and saves the protag. he just fucks off.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
It's anything but. The "prawns" are a transparent, allegory for le oppressed black people, apartheid etc, and the main character becoming one of them is an attempt to punish him by turning him into one of them and making him cloyingly empathetic in the process by having him make metal flowers etc etc
He was the director so yes, ultimately it's his fault and a terrible mistake as he's become blacklisted in Hollywood and his projects require big budgets.
Check out the writer's shady bio though:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Weitz
Yes chang, because that's how shitty leftists and ~~*you*~~ types attempt to wage culture wars: by exaggerating le ebil from one side and the oh so peaceful, agrarian Buddhists from "New Asia"
No social credits again, try harder next time
visually it's cool enough but the scifi is just a backdrop to a predictable boring ass story and zen azn monk robots that actually sleep while charging are laughable at best
it was enjoyable and its sci Fi and that's all that really matters to me. Ya it could have been better, and ya there were some obvious plot holes but it was original and took itself seriously which is a pleasant change. The visuals and setting were great too. Nice to see a scifi movie shot outside/on location and using high quality vfx/cgi as an accessory as opposed to the whole movie being a green screen CGI slop fest
They won't allow themselves to make a good movie with such an inspirational figure as the one you describe. They gotta spend another decade making bad movies all around and casting by skin color novelty points until the heuristic forms and they can finally blame systematic racism of their own making.
It was tge same shit as elysium. They portray the class war as working class westerners and all their ideas are oppressive and the 3rd worlders are these divinely good do gooders. No nuance. No challenging ideas. Would have been a way better film if there was an actual threat coming from the AIs. Which in real life there will be and there might be a very righteous reason why humanity might try to snuff it out. Tired of allegorical woke trash.
Most movie buffs are just jaded now. They hate every that's new solely because it's new. Meanwhile, they'll complain that there's "no original movies"
They aren't just new though, they are also bad
Or maybe you don't like movies, but rather the nostalgia you had for them.
>be miserable, jaded fuck
>still got off his ass to see the new Alexander Payne Paul Giamatti drama
damn it feels good being a multitasker. The movie was nice too with excellent acting. This looks like pretty generic sci-fi from the guy who fumbled Godzilla.
the writing was unbelievably trite. edwards should stick to directing, his writing is utter shit.
Blame the other guy who wrote it (a shady, foaming at the mouth leftist) at least as much as Edwards
i blame edwards for not realizing how utterly garbage the writing was then. his career is probably done for a while after this. this is his chappie.
That's really unfortunate because he is a much better director than Neil Blomkamp ever was. He actually has good films under his belt. This also is not anywhere near as bad as Chappie or Elysium
district 9 absolutely mogs edward's filmography so far.
>a much better director than Neil Blomkamp ever was
low bar. remember how many hipsters thought District 9 was better than Avatar? not heard much from those retards lately.
avatar and district 9 are entirely different movies. they're just both scifi. weird comparison.
The movie does have elements from both movies (and also from Elysium), particularly the bad ones: simpleton political onesidedness, condescendingly idealizing the poor, falling for the good savage myth, cardboard villains etc
district 9 is pretty morally grey. i haven't seen the movie in years but there were gangs and the alien never comes back and saves the protag. he just fucks off.
It's anything but. The "prawns" are a transparent, allegory for le oppressed black people, apartheid etc, and the main character becoming one of them is an attempt to punish him by turning him into one of them and making him cloyingly empathetic in the process by having him make metal flowers etc etc
>District 9 was better than Avatar
It is.
He was the director so yes, ultimately it's his fault and a terrible mistake as he's become blacklisted in Hollywood and his projects require big budgets.
Check out the writer's shady bio though:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Weitz
is it exciting movie?
its blade runner but worse and says less with a bigger budget.
yeah, and by the budget of 80 mill they created a more interesting world than all the blockbusters combined
this is the main point of the story, when you realize that is not a robot anymore but more
>it's not just a robot, it's a special robot!
no, it's just not visceral in the same way if its not an actual child.
>lone wolf and cub
>only the kid is a robot
ruins the premise
>BMAF
not watching it
it didnt engage with the topic of is ai alive or not or were they malevolent or not
apart from short throw away lines
It wasn't terribly hated outside of chuds on Cinemaphile seething about the race of the protagonist.
its less his race and more his total inability to act whatsoever. literal talentless charisma vacuum nepo baby.
my gf cried when he died
i'm sure she showed more emotion than he did in the entirety of his career.
cause it was a cheap tug at instinctual heart strings, the jump scare equivalent in dramas
Horrible, amateurish script with ludicrous plotholes with a pathetic America le bad heavyhandedness
>Horrible, amateurish script with ludicrous plotholes with a pathetic America le bad heavyhandedness
You look like that you resent that
No social credits to you
>seething about america bad in an alt-history flick set decades in the future
Yes chang, because that's how shitty leftists and ~~*you*~~ types attempt to wage culture wars: by exaggerating le ebil from one side and the oh so peaceful, agrarian Buddhists from "New Asia"
No social credits again, try harder next time
Yes, I would rather side with buddhists than pic related. How did you know?
Because you're a dysgenic waste of oxygen who's only alive because the agricultural and farmaceutical revolutions allowed you to exist
>Because you're a dysgenic waste of oxygen who's only alive because the agricultural and farmaceutical revolutions allowed you to exist
Your brown skin gave it away
>a pathetic America le bad heavyhandedness
So it shows a realistic story? Ok, I am sold thanks.
If you're a loser, perhaps it'll fool you. Don't pay to watch it though-- it flopped massively at the theater
>ITT seething americans for being portrayed as the bad guys
visually it's cool enough but the scifi is just a backdrop to a predictable boring ass story and zen azn monk robots that actually sleep while charging are laughable at best
The movie is just boring. I can compare this movie with "The Fifth Element", but "The Fifth Element" has SOVL. "The Creator" has no SOVL.
it was enjoyable and its sci Fi and that's all that really matters to me. Ya it could have been better, and ya there were some obvious plot holes but it was original and took itself seriously which is a pleasant change. The visuals and setting were great too. Nice to see a scifi movie shot outside/on location and using high quality vfx/cgi as an accessory as opposed to the whole movie being a green screen CGI slop fest
I don't watch movies where the protagonist isn't a hetero white male.
They won't allow themselves to make a good movie with such an inspirational figure as the one you describe. They gotta spend another decade making bad movies all around and casting by skin color novelty points until the heuristic forms and they can finally blame systematic racism of their own making.
if the protag in this was white he'd still be boring as fuck because the writing was trash.
It was tge same shit as elysium. They portray the class war as working class westerners and all their ideas are oppressive and the 3rd worlders are these divinely good do gooders. No nuance. No challenging ideas. Would have been a way better film if there was an actual threat coming from the AIs. Which in real life there will be and there might be a very righteous reason why humanity might try to snuff it out. Tired of allegorical woke trash.
Its worth is for the Kid A scene and the suicide bots but most of the rest is pretty dull. Nice to look at I guess